On 11/20/2016 7:48 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>
>>
>
> Bingo. They are mostly compulsive posters who had an excuse to tap out a
> few words without having to use their brains.


Yes, that's YOU alright, bully boy!

It was never enough to spend a career hassling truckers, you had to go
after a woman too!

You exterminable SCUM!

On 11/20/2016 7:56 AM, wrote:
>> That is the shameful work of
>> passive aggressive personalities at play.
> Don't know how you come up with that Dave, but then you are keeping
> good company!


Good HATEFUL company, you worthless rich bitch shrew!

On 11/20/2016 8:10 AM, Ophelia wrote:

>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Bingo. They are mostly compulsive posters who had an excuse to tap out a
>> few words without having to use their brains. Every once in a while they
>> try to stir things up but it hasn't worked. There is a certain irony to
>> their past history of protecting Julie from abuse and then trying to
>> incite negative comments about her. That is the shameful work of
>> passive aggressive personalities at play.
>
> Don't know how you come up with that Dave, but then you are keeping
> good company!
>
> ===
>
> Perfect match)
>
>
>
+1!

On 11/20/2016 8:30 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> We had someone here who had a compulsion to post stuff that annoyed a
> number of people who called her on her bullshit, and there was a small
> group who felt compelled to defend her from what they thought was abuse,


Yes, YOU are an abuser, the same or worse as Sqwerty!

You vermin.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:30:48 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-11-20 9:56 AM, wrote:
>> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 09:48:42 -0500, Dave Smith
>
>>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Bingo. They are mostly compulsive posters who had an excuse to tap out a
>>> few words without having to use their brains. Every once in a while they
>>> try to stir things up but it hasn't worked. There is a certain irony to
>>> their past history of protecting Julie from abuse and then trying to
>>> incite negative comments about her. That is the shameful work of
>>> passive aggressive personalities at play.
>>
>> Don't know how you come up with that Dave, but then you are keeping
>> good company!
>
>
>I didn't think it was that hard to see. We had someone here who had a
>compulsion to post stuff that annoyed a number of people who called her
>on her bullshit, and there was a small group who felt compelled to
>defend her from what they thought was abuse, and they claimed that we
>would attack her even if she wasn't here. That didn't happen. She left
>the group. Since she was no longer posting so people stopped attacking
>her on the content of her posts. He little fan club had no one to
>protect anymore, so nothing much to satisfy their own compulsion to post.
>
>On several occasions these same people have posted about her, which I
>think is a blatant attempt to get people talking about her, basically
>inviting people to make negative comments about her. They aren't going
>to make negative comments about her themselves. Instead, they set bait
>for other people to do that. Perhaps they miss having someone here is
>is more pathetic than themselves.

You are going on at length about her, even though she is no longer
here. I never understood why you, and some others, felt they had to
respond to her every post! Why couldn't you just ignore them? I did
with one exception when she incorrectly blahed on about the Canadian
healthcare system failing her friend in NB. It was all inaccurate and
reflected badly on our health care, so I did correct her on that,
probably not nicely but still. If you would have done that the number
of posts would have dropped dramatically.

On 11/20/2016 9:36 AM, wrote:
> I never understood why you, and some others, felt they had to
> respond to her every post! Why couldn't you just ignore them? I did
> with one exception


STFU you rancid Cancuk SHREW!

You spent plenty of time vilifying her 3rd person and still do, you
hypocritical tramp.

On 2016-11-20 11:36 AM, wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 10:30:48 -0500, Dave Smith

>> I didn't think it was that hard to see. We had someone here who had a
>> compulsion to post stuff that annoyed a number of people who called her
>> on her bullshit, and there was a small group who felt compelled to
>> defend her from what they thought was abuse, and they claimed that we
>> would attack her even if she wasn't here. That didn't happen. She left
>> the group. Since she was no longer posting so people stopped attacking
>> her on the content of her posts. He little fan club had no one to
>> protect anymore, so nothing much to satisfy their own compulsion to post.
>>
>> On several occasions these same people have posted about her, which I
>> think is a blatant attempt to get people talking about her, basically
>> inviting people to make negative comments about her. They aren't going
>> to make negative comments about her themselves. Instead, they set bait
>> for other people to do that. Perhaps they miss having someone here is
>> is more pathetic than themselves.
>
> You are going on at length about her, even though she is no longer
> here.

Nope. I am going on about the people who always tried to encourage her
to make a fool of herself so they could come to her rescue and who are
now baiting people to start talking about her again.



> Why couldn't you just ignore them? I did
> with one exception when she incorrectly blahed on about the Canadian
> healthcare system failing her friend in NB. It was all inaccurate and
> reflected badly on our health care, so I did correct her on that,

Since you insist on talking about her, I would say that sort of thing
was typical of her. She would post and her little sisterhood of
stupidity would cheer her on so they could feel good about themselves.
Now they keep bringing her up again and now suggesting that she would
return, which would just set her up for more chastisement.

On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 9:09:04 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/20/2016 6:12 AM, Janet wrote:
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> The hungry wolves are drooling just thinking about her return or someone of similar ilk.
> >
> > You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
> > "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
> >
> > Janet UK
> >
>
> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.

Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
=====

On 11/20/2016 10:39 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> She would post and her little sisterhood of stupidity would cheer her on
> so they could feel good about themselves. Now they keep bringing her up
> again and now suggesting that she would return, which would just set her
> up for more chastisement.


Wow, you're evil to your very core.

Nothing like shunning a person away FOREVER!

You terrible terrible man.

On 11/20/2016 10:50 AM, Roy wrote:
> On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 9:09:04 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/20/2016 6:12 AM, Janet wrote:
>>> In article >,
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> The hungry wolves are drooling just thinking about her return or someone of similar ilk.
>>>
>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>>
>>> Janet UK
>>>
>>
>> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.
>
> Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
> =====
>

Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!

Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> "cshenk" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > >
> >>"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> > > news > >>> On 11/19/2016 8:48 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:46:06 -0600, Rec Food Cooking
> > wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Come back to rec.food.cooking Julie !!! We all miss you and
> >>> > > hope this message finds you and that you are well. We all wish
> >>> > > you'd come back. The group isn't the same without you. We've
> >>> > > learned our lesson.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Please reconsider participating in rec.food.cooking again. You
> >>> > > won't be sorry. Thank you for listening !!!!
> >>> >
> >>> > Yeah, everyone will be nice. Sure they will
> >>> >
> > > >
> >>> She had a kind heart and is missed.
> > >
> > > Especially by those with not so kind hearts.
> > >
> > > Cheri
> >
> > I like Julie even if she drives me a little batty sometimes. Once i
> > learned to not put too much effort into answering her questons, I
> > stopped getting upset. She does spark some good threads for all of
> > us where the rest of us validly exchange information.
>
> Exactly, and if she doesn't take your advice YOU don't keep coming
> back at her calling her names like Bovine etc., and that's one of the
> nicer names she's called. You just let it go. You have been kind to
> Julie.
>
> Cheri

I hope she feels so. I've never gone out of my way to be mean to anyone.

--

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:02:45 -0700, Sqwertz >
wrote:

> On 11/20/2016 10:50 AM, Roy wrote:
> > On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 9:09:04 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On 11/20/2016 6:12 AM, Janet wrote:
> >>> In article >,
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The hungry wolves are drooling just thinking about her return or someone of similar ilk.
> >>>
> >>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
> >>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
> >>>
> >>> Janet UK
> >>>
> >>
> >> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.
> >
> > Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
> > =====
> >
>
> Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!

Take your meds.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
news
> On 11/20/2016 10:39 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> She would post and her little sisterhood of stupidity would cheer her on
>> so they could feel good about themselves. Now they keep bringing her up
>> again and now suggesting that she would return, which would just set her
>> up for more chastisement.
>
>
> Wow, you're evil to your very core.
>
> Nothing like shunning a person away FOREVER!
>
> You terrible terrible man.

He's the head cheese of "The Bully Boys" no doubt a frustrated wannabe cop
or something, surely someone who NEVER feels good about himself unless he's
reporting people in handicapped parking spaces or reporting someone for
something.

Cheri

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>>
>> "cshenk" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> > >
>> >>"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> > > news >> >>> On 11/19/2016 8:48 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> >>> > On Thu, 17 Nov 2016 11:46:06 -0600, Rec Food Cooking
>> > wrote:
>> >>> >
>> >>> > > Come back to rec.food.cooking Julie !!! We all miss you and
>> >>> > > hope this message finds you and that you are well. We all wish
>> >>> > > you'd come back. The group isn't the same without you. We've
>> >>> > > learned our lesson.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Please reconsider participating in rec.food.cooking again. You
>> >>> > > won't be sorry. Thank you for listening !!!!
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Yeah, everyone will be nice. Sure they will
>> >>> >
>> > > >
>> >>> She had a kind heart and is missed.
>> > >
>> > > Especially by those with not so kind hearts.
>> > >
>> > > Cheri
>> >
>> > I like Julie even if she drives me a little batty sometimes. Once i
>> > learned to not put too much effort into answering her questons, I
>> > stopped getting upset. She does spark some good threads for all of
>> > us where the rest of us validly exchange information.
>>
>> Exactly, and if she doesn't take your advice YOU don't keep coming
>> back at her calling her names like Bovine etc., and that's one of the
>> nicer names she's called. You just let it go. You have been kind to
>> Julie.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I hope she feels so. I've never gone out of my way to be mean to anyone.

Julie and I have butted heads occasionally, but never with hostility and
hate going on. We have disagreed, and then moved on.

Cheri

"Cheri" wrote in message news

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
news
> On 11/20/2016 10:39 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> She would post and her little sisterhood of stupidity would cheer her on
>> so they could feel good about themselves. Now they keep bringing her up
>> again and now suggesting that she would return, which would just set her
>> up for more chastisement.
>
>
> Wow, you're evil to your very core.
>
> Nothing like shunning a person away FOREVER!
>
> You terrible terrible man.

He's the head cheese of "The Bully Boys" no doubt a frustrated wannabe cop
or something, surely someone who NEVER feels good about himself unless he's
reporting people in handicapped parking spaces or reporting someone for
something.

Cheri

===

Yes, he is one of the biggest bullies here. Although he does have his
'perfect match' !

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 1:17:54 PM UTC-7, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:02:45 -0700, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
> > On 11/20/2016 10:50 AM, Roy wrote:
> > > On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 9:09:04 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
> > >> On 11/20/2016 6:12 AM, Janet wrote:
> > >>> In article >,
> > >>> says...
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The hungry wolves are drooling just thinking about her return or someone of similar ilk.
> > >>>
> > >>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
> > >>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
> > >>>
> > >>> Janet UK
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.
> > >
> > > Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
> > > =====
> > >
> >
> > Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!
>
> Take your meds.
>
I see your best TROLL is back...that should make you happy.
Troll on you two...you're good at it.
=====

On 11/20/2016 1:17 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 11:02:45 -0700, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/20/2016 10:50 AM, Roy wrote:
>>> On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 9:09:04 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On 11/20/2016 6:12 AM, Janet wrote:
>>>>> In article >,
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The hungry wolves are drooling just thinking about her return or someone of similar ilk.
>>>>>
>>>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>>>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>>>>
>>>>> Janet UK
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.
>>>
>>> Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
>>> =====
>>>
>>
>> Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!
>
> Take your meds.
>
>
Buy our Uranium back!

http://thefederalist.com/2015/04/23/...-uranium-deal/

On 11/20/2016 1:54 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> news
>> On 11/20/2016 10:39 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> She would post and her little sisterhood of stupidity would cheer her on
>>> so they could feel good about themselves. Now they keep bringing her up
>>> again and now suggesting that she would return, which would just set her
>>> up for more chastisement.
>>
>>
>> Wow, you're evil to your very core.
>>
>> Nothing like shunning a person away FOREVER!
>>
>> You terrible terrible man.
>
> He's the head cheese of "The Bully Boys" no doubt a frustrated wannabe
> cop or something, surely someone who NEVER feels good about himself
> unless he's reporting people in handicapped parking spaces or reporting
> someone for something.
>
> Cheri


He hassled truckers for a living, seriously.

He's a nasty piece of work and the kind of gutless coward that thrives
on denigrating innocent women.

On 11/20/2016 2:42 PM, Ophelia wrote:

>> Wow, you're evil to your very core.
>>
>> Nothing like shunning a person away FOREVER!
>>
>> You terrible terrible man.
>
> He's the head cheese of "The Bully Boys" no doubt a frustrated wannabe cop
> or something, surely someone who NEVER feels good about himself unless he's
> reporting people in handicapped parking spaces or reporting someone for
> something.
>
> Cheri
>
> ===
>
> Yes, he is one of the biggest bullies here. Although he does have his
> 'perfect match' !
>

For lesser values of 'perfect'...yes....

On 11/20/2016 2:53 PM, Roy wrote:

>>>>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
>>>>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Janet UK
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.
>>>>
>>>> Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
>>>> =====
>>>>
>>>
>>> Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!
>>
>> Take your meds.
>>
> I see your best TROLL is back...that should make you happy.
> Troll on you two...you're good at it.
> =====
>

You add virtually NOTHING here, tundra-hopper.

On Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 3:14:44 PM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/20/2016 2:53 PM, Roy wrote:
>
> >>>>>> You might note that the droolers are the sado-masochists who
> >>>>>> "befriended" Julie to have her gratify their own appetites.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Janet UK
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You might DIE and this world would be brighter for it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Come back "SHANE, COME BACK"...memorable quote.
> >>>> =====
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!
> >>
> >> Take your meds.
> >>
> > I see your best TROLL is back...that should make you happy.
> > Troll on you two...you're good at it.
> > =====
> >
>
> You add virtually NOTHING here, tundra-hopper.

Your snide remarks every second posting add NOTHING but that is okay because
you are SPECIAL. I still believe you are OMELET but you won't admit it.
====

On 11/20/2016 8:11 PM, Roy wrote:

>>>>> Get lost Roy boy, get ****ing lost!
>>>>
>>>> Take your meds.
>>>>
>>> I see your best TROLL is back...that should make you happy.
>>> Troll on you two...you're good at it.
>>> =====
>>>
>>
>> You add virtually NOTHING here, tundra-hopper.
>
> Your snide remarks every second posting add NOTHING but that is okay because
> you are SPECIAL. I still believe you are OMELET but you won't admit it.
> ====
>

You should see the view from here. Roy Boy!