Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk
first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social -- Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/22/2016 1:12 PM, sf wrote:
> I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk > first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If > you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have > measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. > > http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social > > > I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that table about how to fill the cup. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-11-22, graham > wrote:
> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup......... How does one "lightly" spoon anything? What? I somehow magically reduce the weight of the ingredient as I spoon? WTF!? nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/22/2016 1:37 PM, notbob wrote:
> On 2016-11-22, graham > wrote: > >> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup......... > > How does one "lightly" spoon anything? What? I somehow magically > reduce the weight of the ingredient as I spoon? WTF!? > > nb > No, you aerate it! And the term "lightly spoon" comes from that book. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"graham" wrote in message news
![]() On 11/22/2016 1:12 PM, sf wrote: > I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk > first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If > you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have > measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. > > http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social > > > I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that table about how to fill the cup. ============ LOL using a scale is simple compared to all that ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:38:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
> On 11/22/2016 1:37 PM, notbob wrote: > > On 2016-11-22, graham > wrote: > > > >> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup......... > > > > How does one "lightly" spoon anything? What? I somehow magically > > reduce the weight of the ingredient as I spoon? WTF!? > > > > nb > > > No, you aerate it! And the term "lightly spoon" comes from that book. Oh, for heaven's sake. Did it not ring any bells when I said to stir it with a whisk first? -- Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:33:59 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
> On 11/22/2016 1:12 PM, sf wrote: > > I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk > > first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If > > you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have > > measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. > > > > http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social > > > > > > > I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the > ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. > Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that > table about how to fill the cup. I can't be bothered with all that stuff. I scoop it out of the canister with the measuring cup and level it off. Then again, I don't bake fussy stuff. Chocolate-chip cookies is about the extent of it. For pizza crust, I weigh the flour, because that's how the recipe came to me. Cindy Hamlton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 9:42 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "graham" wrote in message news ![]() > On 11/22/2016 1:12 PM, sf wrote: >> I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk >> first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If >> you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have >> measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. >> >> http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social >> >> >> >> > I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the > ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. > Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that > table about how to fill the cup. > ============ > > LOL using a scale is simple compared to all that ![]() > Oh, yes!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:42:57 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote: >"graham" wrote in message news ![]() >On 11/22/2016 1:12 PM, sf wrote: >> I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk >> first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If >> you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have >> measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. >> >> http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social >> >> >> >I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the >ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. >Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that >table about how to fill the cup. >============ > >LOL using a scale is simple compared to all that ![]() 'Zactly... 5 ozs = 1 cup. Real bakers never measure flour by volume... precision in baking is highly over rated, it's really not very important or there'd be no such thing as bench flour. Somehow I ended up with 2 sets of volume cup measures, I've never used them for other than nesting toys for very young children, rings of measuring spoons are the best baby rattles. I've never used a shot glass for measuring booze either, same as I've never seen a bartender measure anything other than by eye/feel... and yet an experienced bartender can empty the shaker and pour a 2ni right to the brim every time. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-11-23 6:24 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:33:59 PM UTC-5, graham wrote: >> I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the >> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. >> Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that >> table about how to fill the cup. > > I can't be bothered with all that stuff. I scoop it out of the > canister with the measuring cup and level it off. > > Then again, I don't bake fussy stuff. Chocolate-chip cookies is > about the extent of it. > > For pizza crust, I weigh the flour, because that's how the recipe > came to me. I think of them as conveniently measured amounts. I mean..... a cup dipped into a bin and then leveled off.... vs. a cup that was spoon filled and leveled of.... vs. a given weight that corresponds to a cup???? Then add 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or 1 tsp salt, or baking powder or soda. They are all set amounts that may or not be the exact perfect proportion to get the chemical reaction that is baking. When making things like bread or dough there is usually some bench flour used. I use the same measures and same process when making pie pastry, but it does not always turn out exactly the same. When I roll it out I throw some flour on the pastry cloth and more my rolling pin and on top of the disk of dough. I don't measure that, and not all of it gets incorporated into the rolled dough. I have baked enough cookies over the years to know that it is important to measure ingredients, but there are limits to the degree of accuracy required. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 02:03:50 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:38:13 -0700, graham > wrote: > >> On 11/22/2016 1:37 PM, notbob wrote: >> > On 2016-11-22, graham > wrote: >> > >> >> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup......... >> > >> > How does one "lightly" spoon anything? What? I somehow magically >> > reduce the weight of the ingredient as I spoon? WTF!? >> > >> > nb >> > >> No, you aerate it! And the term "lightly spoon" comes from that book. > >Oh, for heaven's sake. Did it not ring any bells when I said to stir >it with a whisk first? All those are old wives tales now, born from the days before modern flour mills... there's absolutely no reason to sift flour anymore, it all comes presifted. The only reason flour was ever sifted was to remove weevils and other foreign matter... same as there's no longer any reason to shake the milk container, it's all homogenized. I can still remember the days when flour was sold in cloth sacks, paper packaging had not yet come into use... people purchased a fifty pound sack or the grocery clerk weighed out how many pounds one asked for... cheese, butter, and many groceries likewise, there was no presliced in sealed plastic packaging, even tube steaks were individually tied and hung from a hook, no packaged chicken either, if you wanted parts the butcher would do it, however most all poultry was sold live on the hoof. I hated going to the live chicken market with my mother, the stench was morbid. A lot changed with the advent of refrigeration. In the very begining only the wealthiest could afford refrigeration, most everyone still used an ice-a-box, even groceries and butcher shops had ice cooled walk-ins. Young folks cannot imagine how the food industry has changed with the advent of refrigeration, even where people chose to live, most chose the northern states as for about half the year they didn't need to worry when the iceman cometh. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 9:33 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > I have baked enough cookies over the years to know that it is important > to measure ingredients, but there are limits to the degree of accuracy > required. > I've read many times how critical it is to measure when baking. Not always. If you want to duplicate a recipe and have it come out the same every time, yes, measure, weigh, be consistent. If, however, you change the measures you may get something you like better. It will be similar, but not exactly the same. Not worth getting stressed out over a 1/4 tsp of sugar or cinnamon. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:33:59 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2016-11-23 6:24 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:33:59 PM UTC-5, graham wrote: > >>> I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the >>> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. >>> Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that >>> table about how to fill the cup. >> >> I can't be bothered with all that stuff. I scoop it out of the >> canister with the measuring cup and level it off. >> >> Then again, I don't bake fussy stuff. Chocolate-chip cookies is >> about the extent of it. >> >> For pizza crust, I weigh the flour, because that's how the recipe >> came to me. > > >I think of them as conveniently measured amounts. I mean..... a cup >dipped into a bin and then leveled off.... vs. a cup that was spoon >filled and leveled of.... vs. a given weight that corresponds to a >cup???? Then add 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or 1 tsp salt, or baking powder or >soda. They are all set amounts that may or not be the exact perfect >proportion to get the chemical reaction that is baking. > >When making things like bread or dough there is usually some bench flour >used. I use the same measures and same process when making pie pastry, >but it does not always turn out exactly the same. When I roll it out I >throw some flour on the pastry cloth and more my rolling pin and on top >of the disk of dough. I don't measure that, and not all of it gets >incorporated into the rolled dough. > >I have baked enough cookies over the years to know that it is important >to measure ingredients, but there are limits to the degree of accuracy >required. depends what kind of bread baker you are. There are those who have dough ready to go and only need a tablespoon or so of flour on the bench (to prevent sticking to bench and hands) while rounding up. Then there are those who use bench flour to knead into the dough until it is no longer sticky or tacky. In the latter case the amount of flour added at the bench does significantly change the amount in the dough. The first method adds virtually no additional flour. Most people fall into the latter category as they tame the dough with a lot more flour. Light bread vs. stodge. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:10:23 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote: > there's absolutely no reason to sift flour anymore, it > all comes presifted. It settles down, numbskull, that's why anyone who cares about weight should give it a good stir with a whisk before they measure by volume. It's a concept that isn't hard to understand. You don't care about weight and you never use recipes written in miniscule weights, so don't do it. -- Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote: > Real bakers never measure flour by volume. You and Ophelia are real assholes. -- Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:22:15 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> If you want to duplicate a recipe and have it come out the same every > time, yes, measure, weigh, be consistent. If, however, you change the > measures you may get something you like better. It will be similar, but > not exactly the same. Not worth getting stressed out over a 1/4 tsp of > sugar or cinnamon. Agree. How do you propose approaching recipes written in weights when you don't have a scale and only have ways to measure by volume? -- Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > wrote: > >> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. > > You and Ophelia are real assholes. > > TSssk! What's with the anger sf? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:25:03 -0700, Sqwerts
> wrote: > On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > > wrote: > > > >> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. > > > > You and Ophelia are real assholes. > > > > > TSssk! > > What's with the anger sf? I'm tired of their crap. -- Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 10:10 AM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:25:03 -0700, Sqwerts > > wrote: > >> On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. >>> >>> You and Ophelia are real assholes. >>> >>> >> TSssk! >> >> What's with the anger sf? > > I'm tired of their crap. > > Shelly is always like that and O simply tells it like she sees it. The real refuse is in Canaduh. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sqwerts" wrote in message news
![]() On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > wrote: > >> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. > > You and Ophelia are real assholes. > > TSssk! What's with the anger sf? ==================== We are 'assholes' (such educated opinion) because we weigh flour??? LOLOLOL Perhaps she has to say that because she is too dim to use a scale <g> I can see who the 'asshole' is ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 10:23 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "Sqwerts" wrote in message news ![]() >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 >> > wrote: >> >>> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. >> >> You and Ophelia are real assholes. >> >> > TSssk! > > What's with the anger sf? > > ==================== > > We are 'assholes' (such educated opinion) because we weigh flour??? LOLOLOL A reach by any measure, weighed or estimated ;-) > Perhaps she has to say that because she is too dim to use a scale <g> > > I can see who the 'asshole' is ![]() Yowie! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Weighing is definitely easier faster and uses fewer utensils. Keep adding things to the same bowl as you go. If you are nervous about doing that use one container to weigh each dry item before adding to the larger bowl.
I use several online conversion tools: http://www.aqua-calc.com/calculate/f...lume-to-weight http://www.convert-me.com/en/convert/cooking/ This one is a little confusing but absolutely essential if one uses yeast: http://www.traditionaloven.com/conve...converter.html On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:12:48 PM UTC-5, sf wrote: > I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk > first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If > you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have > measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. > > http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social > > > > -- > Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-11-23 10:22 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 9:33 AM, Dave Smith wrote: > >> >> I have baked enough cookies over the years to know that it is important >> to measure ingredients, but there are limits to the degree of accuracy >> required. >> > > I've read many times how critical it is to measure when baking. Not > always. > > If you want to duplicate a recipe and have it come out the same every > time, yes, measure, weigh, be consistent. If, however, you change the > measures you may get something you like better. It will be similar, but > not exactly the same. Not worth getting stressed out over a 1/4 tsp of > sugar or cinnamon. They tell us that method is important too. I had taught my son how to make chocolaate chip cookies when he was a kid. I came home from work on day and he was making a batch of them but had put all the ingredients into the mixing bowl together. I was upset and figured that he had just wasted all the ingredients and the cookies would not turn out. I was wring. They turned out great. I don't recommend screwing with method on all recipes, but that incident taught me that what we are told is essential isn't always. My mother used to experiment with cake recipes all the time. She had noted that cake recipes vary a lot on most of the main ingredients, like fat, sugar, eggs.. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 11:05 AM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:10:23 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > wrote: > >> there's absolutely no reason to sift flour anymore, it >> all comes presifted. > > It settles down, numbskull, that's why anyone who cares about weight > should give it a good stir with a whisk before they measure by volume. > It's a concept that isn't hard to understand. You don't care about > weight and you never use recipes written in miniscule weights, so > don't do it. > > Flour does indeed "settle". That's why I have one of those *old-fangled* flour sifters. ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 8:57 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:33:59 -0500, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2016-11-23 6:24 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:33:59 PM UTC-5, graham wrote: >> >>>> I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the >>>> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. >>>> Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that >>>> table about how to fill the cup. >>> >>> I can't be bothered with all that stuff. I scoop it out of the >>> canister with the measuring cup and level it off. >>> >>> Then again, I don't bake fussy stuff. Chocolate-chip cookies is >>> about the extent of it. >>> >>> For pizza crust, I weigh the flour, because that's how the recipe >>> came to me. >> >> >> I think of them as conveniently measured amounts. I mean..... a cup >> dipped into a bin and then leveled off.... vs. a cup that was spoon >> filled and leveled of.... vs. a given weight that corresponds to a >> cup???? Then add 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or 1 tsp salt, or baking powder or >> soda. They are all set amounts that may or not be the exact perfect >> proportion to get the chemical reaction that is baking. >> >> When making things like bread or dough there is usually some bench flour >> used. I use the same measures and same process when making pie pastry, >> but it does not always turn out exactly the same. When I roll it out I >> throw some flour on the pastry cloth and more my rolling pin and on top >> of the disk of dough. I don't measure that, and not all of it gets >> incorporated into the rolled dough. >> >> I have baked enough cookies over the years to know that it is important >> to measure ingredients, but there are limits to the degree of accuracy >> required. > > depends what kind of bread baker you are. There are those who have > dough ready to go and only need a tablespoon or so of flour on the > bench (to prevent sticking to bench and hands) while rounding up. Then > there are those who use bench flour to knead into the dough until it > is no longer sticky or tacky. In the latter case the amount of flour > added at the bench does significantly change the amount in the dough. > The first method adds virtually no additional flour. Most people fall > into the latter category as they tame the dough with a lot more flour. > Light bread vs. stodge. > Janet US > I made 3x800g sourdough boules yesterday with a 75% hydration. The dough was really sticky to handle but wetting one's hands helps. They look good but I won't know what the crumb is like until later today when friends visit. When in doubt, err on the side of a sticky dough! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-11-23 11:09 AM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:22:15 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote: > >> If you want to duplicate a recipe and have it come out the same every >> time, yes, measure, weigh, be consistent. If, however, you change the >> measures you may get something you like better. It will be similar, but >> not exactly the same. Not worth getting stressed out over a 1/4 tsp of >> sugar or cinnamon. > > Agree. How do you propose approaching recipes written in weights when > you don't have a scale and only have ways to measure by volume? > > Many of the ingredients we use in small amounts use convenient measures, like 1/8, 1/4, 1/2 or 1 tsp. It may be 1 tsp when the absolutely perfect amount would be 15/16 tsp. I fake a lot of dishes and use a smidgen of this, a dash of that and a pinch of something else. If I were to tell someone the recipe i would have to translate those into teaspoons or fraction thereof. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote: >On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:42:57 -0000, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >>"graham" wrote in message news ![]() >>On 11/22/2016 1:12 PM, sf wrote: >>> I use mainly all-purpose flour and know that if I stir it with a whisk >>> first, the weight is spot on, but it's still a useful chart. If >>> you're using a recipe that is written in weighs and you only have >>> measures - it will save you from Googling every item individually. >>> >>> http://www.kingarthurflour.com/learn..._medium=social >>> >>> >>> >>I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the >>ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. >>Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that >>table about how to fill the cup. >>============ >> >>LOL using a scale is simple compared to all that ![]() > >'Zactly... 5 ozs = 1 cup. >Real bakers never measure flour by volume... precision in baking is >highly over rated, it's really not very important or there'd be no >such thing as bench flour. >Somehow I ended up with 2 sets of volume cup measures, I've never used >them for other than nesting toys for very young children, rings of >measuring spoons are the best baby rattles. I've never used a shot >glass for measuring booze either, same as I've never seen a bartender >measure anything other than by eye/feel... and yet an experienced >bartender can empty the shaker and pour a 2ni right to the brim every >time. Wrong. "Generally" and cup of flour weighs 4.5 ounces. Depending upon the type of flour, to be precise, the weight can go from 4.25 ounces to 4.75 ounces. If you have a recipe for bread that calls for 6 cups of white flour, you should use 27 ounces of white flour. If, on the other hand, you think that a cup of flour should weigh 5 ounces, you have over added flour by 3 ounces -- almost 3/4 of a cup more. Then you add a generous amount of bench flour and you could be up over a cup of flour. That flour sucks up liquid and makes your bread dry as a finished product and stales more quickly. A lot of people think that home made bread should be that way because that is the way home made bread is -- "hearty." Another way many make bread is by feel, adding flour as they go along until it seems right. You want to add all the flour at once so that all the flour becomes hydrated at the same time. Adding as you go along means that you run the risk of the dough being too dry as the last flour sucks up more liquid than you had planned on. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> > On 11/23/2016 11:05 AM, sf wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 10:10:23 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > > wrote: > > > >> there's absolutely no reason to sift flour anymore, it > >> all comes presifted. > > > > It settles down, numbskull, that's why anyone who cares about weight > > should give it a good stir with a whisk before they measure by volume. > > It's a concept that isn't hard to understand. You don't care about > > weight and you never use recipes written in miniscule weights, so > > don't do it. > > > > > Flour does indeed "settle". That's why I have one of those > *old-fangled* flour sifters. ![]() Not that I do a lot of baking either but I have never sifted flour and I've never weighed it. If a recipe calls for one cup of flour (or 2 or whatever), I just scoop it out with a measuring cup. I've never had a flour fail. Not ever. Seems like nit-picky stuff to me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:23:07 AM UTC-7, Sqwerts wrote:
> On 11/23/2016 10:10 AM, sf wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:25:03 -0700, Sqwerts > > > wrote: > > > >> On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: > >>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 > >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. > >>> > >>> You and Ophelia are real assholes. > >>> > >>> > >> TSssk! > >> > >> What's with the anger sf? > > > > I'm tired of their crap. > > > > > Shelly is always like that and O simply tells it like she sees it. > > The real refuse is in Canaduh. Now why would you say that? We have ALWAYS been good neighbors and at one time we were one country more or less when Great Britain 'CONTROLLED" us. My folks were "Americans" who came north for homestead land much the same as the Americans went west for new adventures and way of life. We speak English for the most part except for a few easterners from Quebec and New Brunswick. Also we are ALL far smarter than you ever thought of being. Thank the good Lard for that. ==== |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 12:53 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:23:07 AM UTC-7, Sqwerts wrote: >> On 11/23/2016 10:10 AM, sf wrote: >>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:25:03 -0700, Sqwerts >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. >>>>> >>>>> You and Ophelia are real assholes. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> TSssk! >>>> >>>> What's with the anger sf? >>> >>> I'm tired of their crap. >>> >>> >> Shelly is always like that and O simply tells it like she sees it. >> >> The real refuse is in Canaduh. > > Now why would you say that? Factual statement. > We have ALWAYS been good neighbors "Good neighbors" don't butt into the politics of another nation. > and at one time we were one country more or less when Great Britain 'CONTROLLED" us. Thankfully no more. > My folks were "Americans" who came north for homestead land much the same as the Americans went west for new adventures > and way of life. wow, they over-corrected WAY to far north! > We speak English for the most part except for a few easterners from Quebec and New Brunswick. WTF? Le Quebequois? Rene Levesque? Your Frenchies are militant ****ing separatists. > Also we are ALL far smarter than you ever thought of being. Smart enough to live with the next ice age? Enjoy. > Thank the good Lard for that. > ==== Canucklheads don't believe in God, ftmp. Heathen nation of drunkards and poutine heads. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-11-23 2:29 PM, Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: > Not that I do a lot of baking either but I have never sifted flour and > I've never weighed it. If a recipe calls for one cup of flour (or 2 or > whatever), I just scoop it out with a measuring cup. I've never had a > flour fail. Not ever. Seems like nit-picky stuff to me. > I have followed instructions and sifted dry ingredients together and ended up with a bunch of the salt left behind because the grains were too coarse fit through the mesh. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 2:20:53 PM UTC-5, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> Wrong. "Generally" and cup of flour weighs 4.5 ounces. Depending > upon the type of flour, to be precise, the weight can go from 4.25 > ounces to 4.75 ounces. If you have a recipe for bread that calls for > 6 cups of white flour, you should use 27 ounces of white flour. If, > on the other hand, you think that a cup of flour should weigh 5 > ounces, you have over added flour by 3 ounces -- almost 3/4 of a cup > more. Then you add a generous amount of bench flour and you could > be up over a cup of flour. That flour sucks up liquid and makes your > bread dry as a finished product and stales more quickly. A lot of > people think that home made bread should be that way because that is > the way home made bread is -- "hearty." > Another way many make bread is by feel, adding flour as they go along > until it seems right. You want to add all the flour at once so that > all the flour becomes hydrated at the same time. Adding as you go > along means that you run the risk of the dough being too dry as the > last flour sucks up more liquid than you had planned on. > Janet US I don't make bread, but I do occasionally make pizza crust. The person who taught me (and gave me the recipe that I more-or-less follow) said, "For this recipe, don't use any bench flour. When it's been kneaded enough, it'll hold together and come up off the board with just a little encouragement from a bench scraper". He's right. It make a very soft dough (overnight rise) that's a little tricky to stretch into a pizza crust, but it's absolutely delicious. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:12:54 -0700, graham > wrote:
>On 11/23/2016 8:57 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:33:59 -0500, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2016-11-23 6:24 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 3:33:59 PM UTC-5, graham wrote: >>> >>>>> I checked the Amendola "The Baker's Manual", and he specifies that the >>>>> ingredient should be lightly spooned in to the cup before levelling off. >>>>> Some of his weights match KA, others don't. KA doesn't specify on that >>>>> table about how to fill the cup. >>>> >>>> I can't be bothered with all that stuff. I scoop it out of the >>>> canister with the measuring cup and level it off. >>>> >>>> Then again, I don't bake fussy stuff. Chocolate-chip cookies is >>>> about the extent of it. >>>> >>>> For pizza crust, I weigh the flour, because that's how the recipe >>>> came to me. >>> >>> >>> I think of them as conveniently measured amounts. I mean..... a cup >>> dipped into a bin and then leveled off.... vs. a cup that was spoon >>> filled and leveled of.... vs. a given weight that corresponds to a >>> cup???? Then add 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 or 1 tsp salt, or baking powder or >>> soda. They are all set amounts that may or not be the exact perfect >>> proportion to get the chemical reaction that is baking. >>> >>> When making things like bread or dough there is usually some bench flour >>> used. I use the same measures and same process when making pie pastry, >>> but it does not always turn out exactly the same. When I roll it out I >>> throw some flour on the pastry cloth and more my rolling pin and on top >>> of the disk of dough. I don't measure that, and not all of it gets >>> incorporated into the rolled dough. >>> >>> I have baked enough cookies over the years to know that it is important >>> to measure ingredients, but there are limits to the degree of accuracy >>> required. >> >> depends what kind of bread baker you are. There are those who have >> dough ready to go and only need a tablespoon or so of flour on the >> bench (to prevent sticking to bench and hands) while rounding up. Then >> there are those who use bench flour to knead into the dough until it >> is no longer sticky or tacky. In the latter case the amount of flour >> added at the bench does significantly change the amount in the dough. >> The first method adds virtually no additional flour. Most people fall >> into the latter category as they tame the dough with a lot more flour. >> Light bread vs. stodge. >> Janet US >> >I made 3x800g sourdough boules yesterday with a 75% hydration. The dough >was really sticky to handle but wetting one's hands helps. They look >good but I won't know what the crumb is like until later today when >friends visit. When in doubt, err on the side of a sticky dough! I always want to see the crumb to see how I did! It's a real challenge to wait until the loaf is fully cool and cooked. I admire your fortitude ![]() Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 2:53:45 PM UTC-5, Roy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:23:07 AM UTC-7, XXXXXX wrote: > > On 11/23/2016 10:10 AM, sf wrote: > > > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:25:03 -0700, XXXXXXX > > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: > > >>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. > > >>> > > >>> You and Ophelia are real assholes. > > >>> > > >>> > > >> TSssk! > > >> > > >> What's with the anger sf? > > > > > > I'm tired of their crap. > > > > > > > > Shelly is always like that and O simply tells it like she sees it. > > > > The real refuse is in Canaduh. > > Now why would you say that? We have ALWAYS been good neighbors and at one time we were one country more or less when Great Britain 'CONTROLLED" us. > My folks were "Americans" who came north for homestead land much the same as the Americans went west for new adventures and way of life. > We speak English for the most part except for a few easterners from Quebec and New Brunswick. > Also we are ALL far smarter than you ever thought of being. Thank the good Lard for that. Don't worry about Casa Boner (aka Sqwerts). Most of us have nothing but friendship for Canadians. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message
... On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 2:20:53 PM UTC-5, U.S. Janet B. wrote: > Wrong. "Generally" and cup of flour weighs 4.5 ounces. Depending > upon the type of flour, to be precise, the weight can go from 4.25 > ounces to 4.75 ounces. If you have a recipe for bread that calls for > 6 cups of white flour, you should use 27 ounces of white flour. If, > on the other hand, you think that a cup of flour should weigh 5 > ounces, you have over added flour by 3 ounces -- almost 3/4 of a cup > more. Then you add a generous amount of bench flour and you could > be up over a cup of flour. That flour sucks up liquid and makes your > bread dry as a finished product and stales more quickly. A lot of > people think that home made bread should be that way because that is > the way home made bread is -- "hearty." > Another way many make bread is by feel, adding flour as they go along > until it seems right. You want to add all the flour at once so that > all the flour becomes hydrated at the same time. Adding as you go > along means that you run the risk of the dough being too dry as the > last flour sucks up more liquid than you had planned on. > Janet US I don't make bread, but I do occasionally make pizza crust. The person who taught me (and gave me the recipe that I more-or-less follow) said, "For this recipe, don't use any bench flour. When it's been kneaded enough, it'll hold together and come up off the board with just a little encouragement from a bench scraper". He's right. It make a very soft dough (overnight rise) that's a little tricky to stretch into a pizza crust, but it's absolutely delicious. Cindy Hamilton ========================= Well done ![]() else making their own ![]() Just a matter of taste I suppose. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 1:14 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> "Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message > > I don't make bread, but I do occasionally make pizza crust. The > person who taught me (and gave me the recipe that I more-or-less > follow) said, "For this recipe, don't use any bench flour. When > it's been kneaded enough, it'll hold together and come up off > the board with just a little encouragement from a bench scraper". > > He's right. It make a very soft dough (overnight rise) that's > a little tricky to stretch into a pizza crust, but it's absolutely > delicious. > > Cindy Hamilton > > ========================= > > Well done ![]() > anyone else making their own ![]() > > Just a matter of taste I suppose. > I ought to make a batch for my VERY busy d-i-l and family. Because I make a relatively wet dough, the bases are much lighter than "bought" ones and they love them. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 > > wrote: > > > Real bakers never measure flour by volume. > > You and Ophelia are real assholes. > > -- > Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them. Did you actually just say that or was it the troll pretending to be you? Shame on you. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/23/2016 1:10 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 2:53:45 PM UTC-5, Roy wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 23, 2016 at 10:23:07 AM UTC-7, XXXXXX wrote: >>> On 11/23/2016 10:10 AM, sf wrote: >>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:25:03 -0700, XXXXXXX >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 11/23/2016 9:06 AM, sf wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 09:27:34 -0500, Brooklyn1 >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Real bakers never measure flour by volume. >>>>>> >>>>>> You and Ophelia are real assholes. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> TSssk! >>>>> >>>>> What's with the anger sf? >>>> >>>> I'm tired of their crap. >>>> >>>> >>> Shelly is always like that and O simply tells it like she sees it. >>> >>> The real refuse is in Canaduh. >> >> Now why would you say that? We have ALWAYS been good neighbors and at one time we were one country more or less when Great Britain 'CONTROLLED" us. >> My folks were "Americans" who came north for homestead land much the same as the Americans went west for new adventures and way of life. >> We speak English for the most part except for a few easterners from Quebec and New Brunswick. >> Also we are ALL far smarter than you ever thought of being. Thank the good Lard for that. > > Don't worry about Casa Boner (aka Sqwerts). Most of us have nothing > but friendship for Canadians. > > Cindy Hamilton > Tundra-hipping alkys who whine about OUR President while their new PM loots them and destroys their oil companies. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> > Well done ![]() > else making their own ![]() > > Just a matter of taste I suppose. Hey, I make my own all the time. Just an often thing for me so I never mention it here but rarely. Just a few days ago, I made a killer mushroom and onion pizza. I plan to make another next week with a few minor changes. And yes, I always make the crust from scratch (not weighing the flour either heheh). It's so easy to make and much better than any premade crust you can buy, imo. Anyway, I always make a big one (16") every month or two. I change ingredients a bit each time. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary" wrote in message ...
Ophelia wrote: > > Well done ![]() > else making their own ![]() > > Just a matter of taste I suppose. Hey, I make my own all the time. Just an often thing for me so I never mention it here but rarely. Just a few days ago, I made a killer mushroom and onion pizza. I plan to make another next week with a few minor changes. And yes, I always make the crust from scratch (not weighing the flour either heheh). It's so easy to make and much better than any premade crust you can buy, imo. Anyway, I always make a big one (16") every month or two. I change ingredients a bit each time. =================== Hey good for you ![]() Unfortunately, DH only likes ham and pineapple. I could do it blindfold now! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
King arthur Flour | General Cooking | |||
King Arthur Flour | General Cooking | |||
king arthur flour | General Cooking | |||
Translation of Royter's rye ingredient chart. | Sourdough | |||
King Arthur, Part II | Baking |