From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs

Pretty funny

Jill

On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:33:47 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
>
> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
>
> Pretty funny
>
> Jill
>
>
Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
like a cheap stick blender.

" > wrote in
:

> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:33:47 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
>>
>> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
>>
>> Pretty funny
>>
>> Jill
>>
>>
> Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
> to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
> potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
> like a cheap stick blender.
>
>

But I mean WOW, he's really, WOW, kinda WOW entertaining, ya know? WOW.

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs

Pretty funny

Jill
=================

It was and I enjoyed it) I looked at a few more sites listed there too. I
like gadgets <g> Some I have ie large spiraliser - peeler corer etc and
some I wouldn't touch, but I liked seeing them) Ohhh something I really
ought not to mention ... a scale!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It was a folded one! It
opened up into 3 which pulled open and when folded, it just lives in the
drawer next to the knives ...

I think I had better stop now ...

)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

In article 0>, Alan
Holbrook says...
>
> " > wrote in
> :
>
> > On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:33:47 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
> >>
> >> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
> >>
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
> >>
> >> Pretty funny
> >>
> >> Jill
> >>
> >>
> > Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
> > to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
> > potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
> > like a cheap stick blender.
> >
> >
>
> But I mean WOW, he's really, WOW, kinda WOW entertaining, ya know? WOW.

Yabut what did Russians eat and drink before the Americas were
discovered?

On 11/30/2016 4:58 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >
> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
>
> Pretty funny
>
> Jill
> =================
>
> It was and I enjoyed it) I looked at a few more sites listed there
> too. I
> like gadgets <g> Some I have ie large spiraliser - peeler corer etc and
> some I wouldn't touch, but I liked seeing them) Ohhh something I
> really ought not to mention ... a scale!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It was a folded
> one! It opened up into 3 which pulled open and when folded, it just
> lives in the drawer next to the knives ...
>
> I think I had better stop now ...
>
> )
>
Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.

Jill

On 11/30/2016 3:27 AM, Alan Holbrook wrote:
> " > wrote in
> :
>
>> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:33:47 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
>>>
>>> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
>>>
>>> Pretty funny
>>>
>>> Jill
>>>
>>>
>> Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
>> to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
>> potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
>> like a cheap stick blender.
>>
>>
>
> But I mean WOW, he's really, WOW, kinda WOW entertaining, ya know? WOW.
>
WOW! What can I say? I was bored. The guy sounds a bit like Arnold
Schwarzenegger (I know he's not Russian). WOW!

Jill

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 11/30/2016 4:58 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >
> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
>
> Pretty funny
>
> Jill
> =================
>
> It was and I enjoyed it) I looked at a few more sites listed there
> too. I
> like gadgets <g> Some I have ie large spiraliser - peeler corer etc and
> some I wouldn't touch, but I liked seeing them) Ohhh something I
> really ought not to mention ... a scale!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It was a folded
> one! It opened up into 3 which pulled open and when folded, it just
> lives in the drawer next to the knives ...
>
> I think I had better stop now ...
>
> )
>
Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.

Jill

=============

LOL

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 11/30/2016 3:25 AM, Bruce wrote:
> Yabut what did Russians eat and drink before the Americas were
> discovered?

Cold pressed Auztards, of course!

On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
>
> Jill

To match your small minded bullying nature of course, bitch.

On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.

It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?

On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>
> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?

I could bully *you*...

Jill

On 11/30/2016 8:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>
>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>
> I could bully *you*...
>
> Jill


You could certainly *TRY*, you thin-haired old bag, but I think we both
know it won't require much more effort on my part to deconstruct you
completely here.

enjoy!

On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>
>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>
> I could bully *you*...
>
> Jill

My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
to incite some dialogue about Julie.

On 11/30/2016 8:17 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>>
>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>>
>> I could bully *you*...
>>
>> Jill
>
> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
>


You filthy Canuckleheaded bully, it was never enough for you to spend a
career hassling truckers, oh no...

You had to get out here and GRIND on poor Julie until she left.

You're no kind of a man, you're a gutless woman-stalker and a real
scumsucking jerk.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:25:33 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article 0>, Alan
>Holbrook says...
>>
>> " > wrote in
>> :
>>
>> > On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:33:47 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
>> >>
>> >> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
>> >>
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
>> >>
>> >> Pretty funny
>> >>
>> >> Jill
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
>> > to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
>> > potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
>> > like a cheap stick blender.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> But I mean WOW, he's really, WOW, kinda WOW entertaining, ya know? WOW.
>
>Yabut what did Russians eat and drink before the Americas were
>discovered?

Borscht, Vodka


William

On 11/30/2016 9:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
>>
>> Jill
>
> To match your small minded (snip crap)

Seems to me it was a kitchen scale *you* recommended, or at least
seconded, in a thread a couple of years ago. I didn't own a kitchen
scale. Discussion, and this is the scale I bought:

https://s22.postimg.org/on09jejr5/scale.jpg

Doesn't fold up, doesn't fit neatly next to the cookbooks. But it
really does not take up much space. I rarely use my scale. But it is
kinda nifty looking.

Jill

On 11/30/2016 9:13 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 9:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> To match your small minded (snip crap)
>
> Seems to me it was a kitchen scale *you* recommended,

No creamy tits, you thin-haired old hag bully, I never said a word about
scales.

Why did you bully Julie out of here?

Why are you such a hater?

On 11/30/2016 11:13 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 9:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> To match your small minded (snip crap)
>
> Seems to me it was a kitchen scale *you* recommended,

Probably not his evil twin.

> or at least
> seconded, in a thread a couple of years ago. I didn't own a kitchen
> scale. Discussion, and this is the scale I bought:
>
> https://s22.postimg.org/on09jejr5/scale.jpg
>
> Doesn't fold up, doesn't fit neatly next to the cookbooks. But it
> really does not take up much space. I rarely use my scale. But it is
> kinda nifty looking.

I got myself a nice flat scale that would fit in a bookshelf no
problem. Escali, I think.

nancy

In article >, Dave Smith says...
>
> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> > On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> >>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
> >>
> >> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
> >
> > I could bully *you*...
> >
> > Jill
>
> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
> to incite some dialogue about Julie.

Why do you keep bringing her up?

In article >, jmcquown says...
>
> On 11/30/2016 3:27 AM, Alan Holbrook wrote:
> > " > wrote in
> > :
> >
> >> On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 6:33:47 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
> >>>
> >>> From some Russian guy I found on Youtube.
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoTZkfUbqNs
> >>>
> >>> Pretty funny
> >>>
> >>> Jill
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
> >> to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
> >> potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
> >> like a cheap stick blender.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > But I mean WOW, he's really, WOW, kinda WOW entertaining, ya know? WOW.
> >
> WOW! What can I say? I was bored. The guy sounds a bit like Arnold
> Schwarzenegger (I know he's not Russian). WOW!

He doesn't sound German/Austrian. I wouldn't be surprised if he's really
Russian.

In article >, William says...
>
> On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 21:25:33 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article 0>, Alan
> >Holbrook says...
> >>
> >> " > wrote in
> >> :
> >>
> >> > Most of them look like failure gadgets and something to have
> >> > to wash. But I have seen the black plate looking thing to make
> >> > potato chips. One gizmo was just a ricer and the other one looked
> >> > like a cheap stick blender.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >> But I mean WOW, he's really, WOW, kinda WOW entertaining, ya know? WOW.
> >
> >Yabut what did Russians eat and drink before the Americas were
> >discovered?
>
> Borscht, Vodka

If they had beetroot instead of carbs, they were ahead of their time.
Maybe they also added chia seeds.

On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 9:22:40 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/30/2016 9:13 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> > On 11/30/2016 9:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> >>> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
> >>>
> >>> Jill
> >>
> >> To match your small minded (snip crap)
> >
> > Seems to me it was a kitchen scale *you* recommended,
>
> No creamy tits, you thin-haired old hag bully, I never said a word about
> scales.
>
> Why did you bully Julie out of here?
>
> Why are you such a hater?

Nobody bullied Julie. She just didn't like being taken to task for her outrageous tall tales so she withdrew "for a while". She had her detractors and friends like everyone on this forum has/had.
I'm sure she is quite happy or sad as the case may be and is carrying on as usual on different forums around the Internet.
=====

I have 2 very old french fry cutters that work fine.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 12:20:44 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 10:01:26 -0500, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>>
>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>>
>> I could bully *you*...
>
>Killfile the netfront.net domain and you won't see the forging troll.

Yep. And Steve at mixmin might have blocked rfc again for some strange
reason too.

On 2016-11-30 1:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>
>> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>>>
>>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>>>
>>> I could bully *you*...
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
>> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
>> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
>
> Why do you keep bringing her up?
>

I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic nymshifters who
has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.

In article >, Dave Smith says...
>
> On 2016-11-30 1:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >, Dave Smith says...
> >>
> >> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> >>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> >>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
> >>>
> >>> I could bully *you*...
> >>>
> >>> Jill
> >>
> >> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
> >> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
> >> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
> >
> > Why do you keep bringing her up?
> >
>
> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic nymshifters who
> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.

I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>
>> On 2016-11-30 1:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> > In article >, Dave Smith says...
>> >>
>> >> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> >>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> >>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> >>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>> >>>
>> >>> I could bully *you*...
>> >>>
>> >>> Jill
>> >>
>> >> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
>> >> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
>> >> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
>> >
>> > Why do you keep bringing her up?
>> >
>>
>> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic nymshifters who
>> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>
>I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.

She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.

In article >, Jeßus says...
>
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >, Dave Smith says...
> >>
> >> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
> >> nymshifters who
> >> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
> >
> >I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
> >long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>
> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.

The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:29:29 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >, Jeßus says...
>>
>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article >, Dave Smith says...
>> >>
>> >> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
>> >> nymshifters who
>> >> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>> >
>> >I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>> >long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>>
>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
>
>The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
>by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.

Sorry, I still don't see any bullying towards Julie. She gets the
responses she deserves just like everyone else here. Anyway, that's
all I have to say about it for now.

On 11/30/2016 1:40 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 9:22:40 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 9:13 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2016 9:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> To match your small minded (snip crap)
>>>
>>> Seems to me it was a kitchen scale *you* recommended,
>>
>> No creamy tits, you thin-haired old hag bully, I never said a word about
>> scales.
>>
>> Why did you bully Julie out of here?
>>
>> Why are you such a hater?
>
> Nobody bullied Julie. She just didn't like being taken to task for her outrageous tall tales so she withdrew "for a while". She had her detractors and friends like everyone on this forum has/had.
> I'm sure she is quite happy or sad as the case may be and is carrying on as usual on different forums around the Internet.
> =====
>
Really, I'm a creamy tits (WTF does that mean?!) thin-haired old hag
bully? I posted a funny link about potato gadgets. FWIW, Julie is
older than I am. I'm not the one dredging her name into any
conversations on this ng.

Jill

On 11/30/2016 2:55 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:29:29 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
>> In article >, Jeßus says...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>>>>
>>>>> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
>>>>> nymshifters who
>>>>> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>>>>
>>>> I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>>>> long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>>>
>>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
>>
>> The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
>> by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.
>
> Sorry, I still don't see any bullying towards Julie.

1. She's not here any more, the bullies won.

2. You were one of the bullies.

3. I shit on trash like you.

On 11/30/2016 2:29 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
> The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
> by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.

You forgot poor Omelet.

Wertz took her out.

On 11/30/2016 2:11 PM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>
>> On 2016-11-30 1:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>>>>>
>>>>> I could bully *you*...
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
>>>> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
>>>> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
>>>
>>> Why do you keep bringing her up?
>>>
>>
>> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic nymshifters who
>> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>
> I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
> long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>

So why DID you?

On 11/30/2016 11:21 AM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>
>> On 2016-11-30 10:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2016 9:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On 11/30/2016 7:14 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> WOW! What can I say? I was bored.
>>>>
>>>> It's hard on you since you chased Julie off, no one left to bully, huh?
>>>
>>> I could bully *you*...
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> My filter has been working overtime these days because someone is off
>> their meds. It is interesting to see some of these people still trying
>> to incite some dialogue about Julie.
>
> Why do you keep bringing her up?
>

He's a lonely old bully of a man-pusssy.

On 11/30/2016 11:40 AM, Roy wrote:
> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 9:22:40 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/30/2016 9:13 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 11/30/2016 9:55 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On 11/30/2016 6:29 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> Shhhhh... My kitchen scale is also very small.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> To match your small minded (snip crap)
>>>
>>> Seems to me it was a kitchen scale *you* recommended,
>>
>> No creamy tits, you thin-haired old hag bully, I never said a word about
>> scales.
>>
>> Why did you bully Julie out of here?
>>
>> Why are you such a hater?
>
> Nobody bullied Julie.

L_I_A_R!!!

> She just didn't like being taken to task for her outrageous tall tales so she withdrew "for a while".

Bully apologism.

> She had her detractors and friends like everyone on this forum has/had.
> I'm sure she is quite happy or sad as the case may be and is carrying on as usual on different forums around the
> Internet.
> =====

You Goddamned old tundra-hopping bully apologist!

**** YOUR EVIL SOUL TO HELL!

On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:55:39 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:29:29 +1100, Bruce >
>wrote:
>
>>In article >, Jeßus says...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> >In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>> >>
>>> >> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
>>> >> nymshifters who
>>> >> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>>> >
>>> >I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>>> >long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>>>
>>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
>>
>>The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
>>by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.
>
>Sorry, I still don't see any bullying towards Julie. She gets the
>responses she deserves just like everyone else here.

But then at some point it's time to totally ignore her, same as with
any troll... ignoring her was the response she deserved. I don't
believe she was driven from RFC because people were harranguing her
(although a few did), she left when she finally realized that most
people were ignoring her.

On 11/30/2016 5:24 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:55:39 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:29:29 +1100, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> In article >, Jeßus says...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
>>>>>> nymshifters who
>>>>>> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>>>>> long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>>>>
>>>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>>>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>>>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
>>>
>>> The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
>>> by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.
>>
>> Sorry, I still don't see any bullying towards Julie. She gets the
>> responses she deserves just like everyone else here.
>
> But then at some point it's time to totally ignore her, same as with
> any troll... ignoring her was the response she deserved. I don't
> believe she was driven from RFC because people were harranguing her
> (although a few did), she left when she finally realized that most
> people were ignoring her.
>

That's a ****ing LIE.

And you went after her too, little man.

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:41:09 -0700, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On 11/30/2016 5:24 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:55:39 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:29:29 +1100, Bruce >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> In article >, Jeßus says...
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
>>>>>>> nymshifters who
>>>>>>> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>>>>>> long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>>>>>
>>>>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>>>>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>>>>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
>>>>
>>>> The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
>>>> by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.
>>>
>>> Sorry, I still don't see any bullying towards Julie. She gets the
>>> responses she deserves just like everyone else here.
>>
>> But then at some point it's time to totally ignore her, same as with
>> any troll... ignoring her was the response she deserved. I don't
>> believe she was driven from RFC because people were harranguing her
>> (although a few did), she left when she finally realized that most
>> people were ignoring her.
>>
>
>That's a ****ing LIE.
>
>And you went after her too, little man.

As someone who only once corrected her when she spoke about what she
didn't know (the Canadian health care system) it amazes me. Must be
months since she posted and you people are still cranking on about
her! I think you should all get a life!

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 19:24:55 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Thu, 01 Dec 2016 08:55:39 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:29:29 +1100, Bruce >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>In article >, Jeßus says...
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, 1 Dec 2016 08:11:28 +1100, Bruce >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >In article >, Dave Smith says...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I didn't I was responding to someone about the psychotic
>>>> >> nymshifters who
>>>> >> has mentioned her and talked about her being bullied out of the group.
>>>> >
>>>> >I think she's quite resistant to bullying or she wouldn't have lasted so
>>>> >long. That's not a reason to bully her, of course.
>>>>
>>>> She wasn't ever bullied. Why are you so selective about who is and
>>>> isn't 'bullied' here on rfc? If I or anyone else posted half the stuff
>>>> she did, I'd be taken to task for it, and rightly so.
>>>
>>>The people who I've ever seen consistently being bullied here, are Julie
>>>by a group, and the victims of the troll just by the troll.
>>
>>Sorry, I still don't see any bullying towards Julie. She gets the
>>responses she deserves just like everyone else here.
>
>But then at some point it's time to totally ignore her, same as with
>any troll... ignoring her was the response she deserved. I don't
>believe she was driven from RFC because people were harranguing her
>(although a few did), she left when she finally realized that most
>people were ignoring her.

I ignored her for extended periods of time. Other times I chose not
to.

Anyway, why not reply to my response to your drunken rant yesterday?
Why is it you always somehow manage to stop replying to a thread after
you've made a fool of yourself?

In future, switch off your modem before reaching for the bottle.