| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce >
wrote: >In article >, says... >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >> >In article >, The >> >Greatest! says... >> >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >> >> > >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >> > >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! > >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put out for all to see on usenet??? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 23:13:59 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> "cshenk" wrote in message >> ... >> >> Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >> > Brooklyn1 wrote: >> > > >> >> On my chest I have the >> >> entire sixth fleet composed of tall sailing ships, with a light >> >> house, water, birds, clouds, and writing. >> > >> > Do you really have that? >> > Did you do a Navy career or just a short time enlistment? >> >> He did one tour, possibly a second. Probably got out as a junior E5 >> or could have been a pretty sharp E4. Ignoring all the exagguration, >> he was a MS (now called CS) meaning cook. He lacks knowledge (but can >> fancifully make it up) on the more senior aspects of the rate but >> that's fine, they aren't expected of a PO2 and in fact only start >> accuring as a senior PO2 up for PO1. Honorably served I am sure. No >> everyone stays the full 20 and he obviously did well for himself >> later. >> >> ============= >> >> Carol >> >> Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >> >> I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would >> you. > >Fact is his version can be so twisted, it makes him look like he never >served. He did and that is my point. > >Note he validated my post. He's an honorable US Navy veteran with 6 >years service. No one can take tht away from him and if any question >his service, I will reply that it is valid. > >end trans I don't think you get the message! |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
Bruce wrote:
>lucretia writes >>Bruce wrote: >> >U.S. Janet B. writes: >> >>Bruce writes: >> >> >The Greatest! writes: >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >> >> >> >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >> >> > >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. >> >> >> >> not at all. Too bad you can't tell the difference. >> >> Janet US >> > >> >I think you all secretely like sexist talk. >> >> Well then you are worse than him! > >How? That's just what I observed. Unfortunately the pinheads don't know the difference between sexist/sexism and sexuality. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
"cshenk" wrote in message
... Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking: > "cshenk" wrote in message > ... > > Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > Brooklyn1 wrote: > > > > >> On my chest I have the > >> entire sixth fleet composed of tall sailing ships, with a light > >> house, water, birds, clouds, and writing. > > > > Do you really have that? > > Did you do a Navy career or just a short time enlistment? > > He did one tour, possibly a second. Probably got out as a junior E5 > or could have been a pretty sharp E4. Ignoring all the exagguration, > he was a MS (now called CS) meaning cook. He lacks knowledge (but can > fancifully make it up) on the more senior aspects of the rate but > that's fine, they aren't expected of a PO2 and in fact only start > accuring as a senior PO2 up for PO1. Honorably served I am sure. No > everyone stays the full 20 and he obviously did well for himself > later. > > ============= > > Carol > > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would > you. Fact is his version can be so twisted, it makes him look like he never served. He did and that is my point. Note he validated my post. He's an honorable US Navy veteran with 6 years service. No one can take tht away from him and if any question his service, I will reply that it is valid. end trans === "He lacks knowledge (but can fancifully make it up)" -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On 2016-12-24 2:38 PM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >>> In article >, >>> says... >>>> >>>> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In article >, The >>>>> Greatest! says... >>>>>> >>>>>> Ophelia wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >>>>> >>>>> All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >>>>> women voting for President P. Grabber. >>>> >>>> I wasn't defending him!!! >>> >>> "putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." >> >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put >> out for all to see on usenet??? > > I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it > himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male > chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. > It may be a variation of the Stockholm syndrome. Look at the number of women who voted for the Trumpster. Never the less, it should be clear why some people don't post details of their occupations. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
In article >, Dave Smith says...
> > On 2016-12-24 2:38 PM, Bruce wrote: > > In article >, > > says... > >> > >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> In article >, > >>> says... > >>>> > >>>> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> In article >, The > >>>>> Greatest! says... > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Ophelia wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Well said, Ms. O...!!! > >>>>> > >>>>> All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those > >>>>> women voting for President P. Grabber. > >>>> > >>>> I wasn't defending him!!! > >>> > >>> "putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." > >> > >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is > >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put > >> out for all to see on usenet??? > > > > I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it > > himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male > > chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. > > > > It may be a variation of the Stockholm syndrome. That's what I was thinking of too. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce >
wrote: >In article >, says... >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >> >In article >, >> says... >> >> >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article >, The >> >> >Greatest! says... >> >> >> >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >> >> > >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. >> >> >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! >> > >> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." >> >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put >> out for all to see on usenet??? > >I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it >himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male >chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. It has nothing to do with Sheldon. It was simply inappropriate behavior on Carol's part. Service personnel of whatever war do not need their rank and duties picked over and validated by another. It was dismissive and condescending. As to your behavior. You and your pals have been ragging on females for the last week or so without provocation or retaliation. You have been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will not engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other topic. Jack off all by yourself. Janet US |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
In article >, U.S. Janet B.
says... > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce > > wrote: > > >In article >, > says... > >> > >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >In article >, > >> says... > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >In article >, The > >> >> >Greatest! says... > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! > >> >> > > >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those > >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. > >> >> > >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! > >> > > >> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." > >> > >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is > >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put > >> out for all to see on usenet??? > > > >I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it > >himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male > >chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. > > It has nothing to do with Sheldon. It was simply inappropriate > behavior on Carol's part. Service personnel of whatever war do not > need their rank and duties picked over and validated by another. It > was dismissive and condescending. > As to your behavior. You and your pals have been ragging on females > for the last week or so without provocation or retaliation. Which pals? Which women? What are you on about? Time to take your pills. > You have > been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will not > engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other topic. Snooty drama queen. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce >
wrote: >In article >, says... >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >> >In article >, >> says... >> >> >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article >, The >> >> >Greatest! says... >> >> >> >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >> >> > >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. >> >> >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! >> > >> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." >> >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put >> out for all to see on usenet??? > >I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it >himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male >chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. I was attacking the concept that it was okay to put other posters details on usenet like that - far be it from me to defend an individual with an 8 year old boys potty mouth! |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 13:12:35 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote: >On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce > >wrote: > >>In article >, says... >>> >>> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > >>> wrote: >>> >>> >In article >, >>> says... >>> >> >>> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > >>> >> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >In article >, The >>> >> >Greatest! says... >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Ophelia wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >>> >> > >>> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >>> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. >>> >> >>> >> I wasn't defending him!!! >>> > >>> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." >>> >>> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is >>> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put >>> out for all to see on usenet??? >> >>I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it >>himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male >>chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. > >It has nothing to do with Sheldon. It was simply inappropriate >behavior on Carol's part. Service personnel of whatever war do not >need their rank and duties picked over and validated by another. It >was dismissive and condescending. >As to your behavior. You and your pals have been ragging on females >for the last week or so without provocation or retaliation. You have >been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will not >engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other topic. >Jack off all by yourself. >Janet US You GO girl  Have a great Xmas and all the best in 2017. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 07:18:06 +1100, Bruce >
wrote: >In article >, U.S. Janet B. >says... >> >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >> >In article >, >> says... >> >> >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >In article >, >> >> says... >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >In article >, The >> >> >> >Greatest! says... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither would you. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! >> >> >> > >> >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all those >> >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. >> >> >> >> >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! >> >> > >> >> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." >> >> >> >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is >> >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history put >> >> out for all to see on usenet??? >> > >> >I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it >> >himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this male >> >chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. >> >> It has nothing to do with Sheldon. It was simply inappropriate >> behavior on Carol's part. Service personnel of whatever war do not >> need their rank and duties picked over and validated by another. It >> was dismissive and condescending. >> As to your behavior. You and your pals have been ragging on females >> for the last week or so without provocation or retaliation. > >Which pals? Which women? What are you on about? Time to take your pills. > >> You have >> been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will not >> engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other topic. > >Snooty drama queen. No she wasn't - quit crying baby - you know she means you and Dave. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> In article >, U.S. Janet > B. says... > > > > On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce > > > wrote: > > > > > In article >, > > > says... > > >> > > >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> >In article >, > > >> says... > > >> >> > > >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > > > >> >> wrote: > > >> >> > > >> >> >In article > > >, The >> >> > > >Greatest! says... >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > > >> >> >> > > > >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, > > neither would you. >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! > > >> >> > > > >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like > > all those >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. > > >> >> > > >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! > > >> > > > >> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." > > >> > > >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it > > is >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work > > history put >> out for all to see on usenet??? > > > > > > I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it > > > himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this > > > male chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. > > > > It has nothing to do with Sheldon. It was simply inappropriate > > behavior on Carol's part. Service personnel of whatever war do not > > need their rank and duties picked over and validated by another. > > It was dismissive and condescending. > > As to your behavior. You and your pals have been ragging on females > > for the last week or so without provocation or retaliation. > > Which pals? Which women? What are you on about? Time to take your > pills. What you see is an uneven treatment by some women at men, then not recognizing it for what it is. They get OUTRAGED when it is directed at women, but fail to see it when directed at men. Sheldon's service has been dismissed by most. I object to that. As a result, you see some of the *women* upset at me because they want me to castigate his every word. That is their problem. They want me to ignore his service when it comes into question instead of recognizing it and the time period being 50 years or so ago. I don't approve of much Sheldon says, but i largely ignore him or if replying, trim the stupid parts. > > You have > > been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will > > not engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other > > topic. > > Snooty drama queen. (grin) Fact is for *some* of the women here, if I don't follow them like a lemming, they go on attack and always have. I suspect some are upset that I don't act very lemming-like. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 06:38:20 +1100, Bruce > > wrote: > > > In article >, > > says... > >> > >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 14:46:18 +1100, Bruce > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >In article >, > >> says... > >> >> > >> >> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >In article > >, The >> >> > >Greatest! says... >> >> >> > >> >> >> Ophelia wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, > neither would you. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Well said, Ms. O...!!! > >> >> > > >> >> >All these women defending the biggest sexist is a bit like all > those >> >> >women voting for President P. Grabber. > >> >> > >> >> I wasn't defending him!!! > >> > > >> >"putting stuff about him on usenet is not good." > >> > >> I don't see that as defending him personally, just suggesting it is > >> not good to do that to anyone - would you like your work history > put >> out for all to see on usenet??? > > > > I have no strong opinion about that since he often talks about it > > himself. I was just surprised to see women eager to defend this > > male chauvinist pig and it reminded me of who won the US election. > > I was attacking the concept that it was okay to put other posters > details on usenet like that - far be it from me to defend an > individual with an 8 year old boys potty mouth! It was merely a repeat of what he's said and others for the past 20 years and if you wrre not a noob, you'd have recognized a recap. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
In article >, cshenk
says... > > What you see is an uneven treatment by some women at men, then not > recognizing it for what it is. They get OUTRAGED when it is directed at > women, but fail to see it when directed at men. > > Sheldon's service has been dismissed by most. I object to that. As a > result, you see some of the *women* upset at me because they want me to > castigate his every word. > > That is their problem. They want me to ignore his service when it > comes into question instead of recognizing it and the time period being > 50 years or so ago. > > I don't approve of much Sheldon says, but i largely ignore him or if > replying, trim the stupid parts. > > In article >, U.S. Janet > > B. says... > > > You have > > > been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I will > > > not engage further with you or your buddies on this or any other > > > topic. > On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > > >> >> wrote: > > Snooty drama queen. > > (grin) Fact is for *some* of the women here, if I don't follow them > like a lemming, they go on attack and always have. I suspect some are > upset that I don't act very lemming-like. I think that the U.S. Janet B. (sounds like the name of a battleship) has her nose so high in the air that she can't read all Usenet messages properly. So sometimes the poor thing comes out with whoppers. Even during Christmas! |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
In article >, cshenk
says... > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > I was attacking the concept that it was okay to put other posters > > details on usenet like that - far be it from me to defend an > > individual with an 8 year old boys potty mouth! > > It was merely a repeat of what he's said and others for the past 20 > years and if you wrre not a noob, you'd have recognized a recap. And he can speak up if he disagrees. It's not like you're talking behind his back. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 07:59:19 -0400, wrote: > > >On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 23:13:59 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote: > > > > > Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > >>> "cshenk" wrote in message > >>> ... > >>> > >>> Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >>> > >>> > Brooklyn1 wrote: > >>> > > > >>> >> On my chest I have the > >>> >> entire sixth fleet composed of tall sailing ships, with a light > >>> >> house, water, birds, clouds, and writing. > >>> > > >>> > Do you really have that? > >>> > Did you do a Navy career or just a short time enlistment? > >>> > >>> He did one tour, possibly a second. Probably got out as a junior > E5 >>> or could have been a pretty sharp E4. Ignoring all the > exagguration, >>> he was a MS (now called CS) meaning cook. He lacks > knowledge (but can >>> fancifully make it up) on the more senior > aspects of the rate but >>> that's fine, they aren't expected of a > PO2 and in fact only start >>> accuring as a senior PO2 up for PO1. > Honorably served I am sure. No >>> everyone stays the full 20 and he > obviously did well for himself >>> later. > >>> > >>> ============= > >>> > >>> Carol > >>> > >>> Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > >>> > >>> I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither > would >>> you. > > > > > > Fact is his version can be so twisted, it makes him look like he > > > never served. He did and that is my point. > > > > > > Note he validated my post. He's an honorable US Navy veteran > > > with 6 years service. No one can take tht away from him and if > > > any question his service, I will reply that it is valid. > > > > > > end trans > > > > I don't think you get the message! > > Carol can't, she's incapable, she's affected by too much hate and > envy... here the slug makes a feeble attempt at slithering away from > her callous remarks but everyone can plainly see her slime trail as a > witness mark. > I can assure everyone that Carol never served in the US Navy, at best > she learned a modicum of naval nomenclature from her brief stint with > the sea cadets (the nautical version of the Brownies/Girl Scouts). > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United...ea_Cadet_Corps > But much more likely Carol spent her youth living in close proximity > to a naval base and learned by injection from screwing sailors she > picked up at the local gedunk. As I said, Carol never served in the > US Navy... Carol served the US Navy. Love you too Sheldon. Also laughing my way to the bank with Tricare Prime and a decent retirement check for 26 years service. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> In article >, cshenk > says... > > > > What you see is an uneven treatment by some women at men, then not > > recognizing it for what it is. They get OUTRAGED when it is > > directed at women, but fail to see it when directed at men. > > > > Sheldon's service has been dismissed by most. I object to that. > > As a result, you see some of the women upset at me because they > > want me to castigate his every word. > > > > That is their problem. They want me to ignore his service when it > > comes into question instead of recognizing it and the time period > > being 50 years or so ago. > > > > I don't approve of much Sheldon says, but i largely ignore him or if > > replying, trim the stupid parts. > > > > In article >, U.S. > > > Janet B. says... > > > > > You have > > > > been hoping to start something. I'm telling you right now, I > > > > will not engage further with you or your buddies on this or any > > > > other topic. > > > On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 10:52:55 +1100, Bruce > > > >> >> wrote: > > > > Snooty drama queen. > > > > (grin) Fact is for some of the women here, if I don't follow them > > like a lemming, they go on attack and always have. I suspect some > > are upset that I don't act very lemming-like. > > I think that the U.S. Janet B. (sounds like the name of a battleship) > has her nose so high in the air that she can't read all Usenet > messages properly. So sometimes the poor thing comes out with > whoppers. Even during Christmas! I don't really know. She seems decent people overall. I really don't track who uses the killfile that much but maybe she gets spotty traffic over one? Hard to say. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> In article >, cshenk > says... > > > > wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > I was attacking the concept that it was okay to put other posters > > > details on usenet like that - far be it from me to defend an > > > individual with an 8 year old boys potty mouth! > > > > It was merely a repeat of what he's said and others for the past 20 > > years and if you wrre not a noob, you'd have recognized a recap. > > And he can speak up if he disagrees. It's not like you're talking > behind his back. Nor was I talking behind his back. It was all in public and he validated it. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> "cshenk" wrote in message > ... > > Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > "cshenk" wrote in message > > ... > > > > Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > >> Brooklyn1 wrote: > >> > > >>> On my chest I have the > >>> entire sixth fleet composed of tall sailing ships, with a light > >>> house, water, birds, clouds, and writing. > > > > >> Do you really have that? > >> Did you do a Navy career or just a short time enlistment? > > > > He did one tour, possibly a second. Probably got out as a junior E5 > > or could have been a pretty sharp E4. Ignoring all the > > exagguration, he was a MS (now called CS) meaning cook. He lacks > > knowledge (but can fancifully make it up) on the more senior > > aspects of the rate but that's fine, they aren't expected of a PO2 > > and in fact only start accuring as a senior PO2 up for PO1. > > Honorably served I am sure. No everyone stays the full 20 and he > > obviously did well for himself later. > > > > ============= > > > > Carol > > > > Might I suggest you just leave him to speak for himself. > > > > I wouldn't like anyone doing that to me, and I suspect, neither > > would you. > > Fact is his version can be so twisted, it makes him look like he never > served. He did and that is my point. > > Note he validated my post. He's an honorable US Navy veteran with 6 > years service. No one can take tht away from him and if any question > his service, I will reply that it is valid. > > end trans > > === > > "He lacks knowledge (but can fancifully make it up)" Read for context, that is on senior levels of 12 years and up service as said above, in his rate. E6 and above. He lacks that nor has he claimed to have it. There is nothing wrong in him having done 6 years honorable service to the nation. It is more than most here have done for theirs. -- |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Some USIANs opinion of England and the English <g>
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 17:08:59 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:
wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> > >> > Note he validated my post. He's an honorable US Navy veteran with 6 >> > years service. No one can take tht away from him and if any >> > question his service, I will reply that it is valid. >> > >> > end trans >> >> I don't think you get the message! > >No I do. You didn't get the message that it's not about what Sheldon is/or isn't but rather that it is inappropriate to put other peoples personal detail up online. You clearly did that. You do NOT. You want me to diss him just because you do not >like him. I am hardly 'dissing' him I too find him objectionable many times (and I curb him >better than you do by far if he upsets me) but you want to pretend >there is no honorable service time on his end. I don't often find his posts objectionable, I gave up reading them. I have no desire to 'curb' him ! > >You may not 'like' him or that he's a signature of an earlier male >oriented culture, but that is no reason to deny he served in the USN at >all. As to a signature of an earlier male oriented culture, that's just babble talk. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New scam alert! Non-English-speaking illegals as foster parentsof monolingual English U.S. kids! | General Cooking | |||
| CONVERT RECIPE MEASUREMENTS : ENGLISH-METRIC, METRIC-ENGLISH | Baking | |||
| CONVERT RECIPE MEASUREMENTS : ENGLISH-METRIC, METRIC-ENGLISH | General Cooking | |||
| Woo Hoo! (ping Southern USians) | General Cooking | |||
| Any non-USians do TG dinner? | General Cooking | |||
Linear Mode
