On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:59:33 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>>On 1/2/2017 8:55 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If women can be "bitches," what is the equivalent term for men?
>>>
>>> "arrogant assholes" and sadly there seem to be many of them.
>>>
>>> You would be horrified to hear some of the 'man-talk' I
>>> often hear at work. This is what I get for being a blue-collar
>>> worker and dealing with the low-life of America.
>>>
>>> Racist, sexist... you name it. I hear it all the time.
>>>
>>
>>It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
>>walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
>>For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
>>there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
>
>that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
>women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
>Janet US

Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
imaginable.

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 10:48:54 AM UTC-6, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>
> >I hoped nor expected anything from the Democratic party. But
> >there certainly will be change from the Republicans. However,
> >they need to remember who brought them to the dance and not have
> >amnesia once in power.
>
> I think your dance date is leaving with another partner
> Janet US
>
>
Naw, the dance hasn't even started yet.

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 11:25:20 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> Women today are a lot more free
> spirited than they were in the 80s and they were very willing to try
> anything back then. When they said they didn't want to go out on a
> date alone and wanted to bring their girlfriend with her date the
> double date wasn't for protection, it was for participation.
>
>
Sheldon, Sheldon, Sheldon. You have an out of control, vivid, and
wishful thinking imagination. Is sex so hard to come by for the
women of NYC?

"U.S. Janet B." wrote in message
...

On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:44:54 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:

>On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:37:09 PM UTC-6, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:20:32 -0800 (PST), "
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >People were also fed up with the "Hope and Change" brought
>> >to us by a Democratic community organizer.
>>
>> Just remember what it was you hoped for with Trump and the Republicans
>> and see if you get what you thought you were voting for
>>
>>
>I hoped nor expected anything from the Democratic party. But
>there certainly will be change from the Republicans. However,
>they need to remember who brought them to the dance and not have
>amnesia once in power.

I think your dance date is leaving with another partner
Janet US

===

lol

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:40:23 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-01-02 11:59 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>
>>> It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
>>> walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
>>> For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
>>> there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
>>
>> that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
>> women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
>
>
>It's curious that you can dismiss someone with the label of "hater" and
>then specify which groups will be subject of their prejudices. I have
>always been interesting that some supposedly open minded people have no
>problems dismissing members of various groups, institutions or
>occupations as being racist.
>
I said 'whoever' to include all that makes haters feel their
inadequacy. I said nothing about being racist, nor did I mention
groups. Obviously you immediately thought of something. The fact
that many of these haters group together is not the issue. Normal,
nice people, who like others just don't talk that way.
Janet US

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 06:45:20 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:40:23 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2017-01-02 11:59 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
>>>> walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
>>>> For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
>>>> there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
>>>
>>> that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
>>> women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
>>
>>
>>It's curious that you can dismiss someone with the label of "hater" and
>>then specify which groups will be subject of their prejudices.
>
>A classic partisan lefty democrat way of thinking. The irony of their
>own bigotry would never occur to them. This is an example why I have
>no time for either side of the political fence, they are both
>unbalanced in their outlook and are really just two sides of the same
>coin.
>
>> I have
>>always been interesting that some supposedly open minded people have no
>>problems dismissing members of various groups, institutions or
>>occupations as being racist.
>
>Yep. You see it all the time.
I mentioned no political party, gender, group or object of hate. I
meant what I said. People who talk like that about women hate in
general. They feel put upon and insignificant and try to bolster
themselves by putting someone else down.
Janet US

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 15:13:28 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:59:33 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>>On 1/2/2017 8:55 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If women can be "bitches," what is the equivalent term for men?
>>>>
>>>> "arrogant assholes" and sadly there seem to be many of them.
>>>>
>>>> You would be horrified to hear some of the 'man-talk' I
>>>> often hear at work. This is what I get for being a blue-collar
>>>> worker and dealing with the low-life of America.
>>>>
>>>> Racist, sexist... you name it. I hear it all the time.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
>>>walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
>>>For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
>>>there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
>>
>>that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
>>women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
>>Janet US
>
>Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>imaginable.

Foul language is not the issue, putting women or people down by
calling them names or objectifying them is the issue. People who do
that have no respect or liking for others. They make those remarks to
make themselves feel superior.
Janet US

"U.S. Janet B." wrote in message
...

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 06:45:20 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:40:23 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2017-01-02 11:59 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
>>>> walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
>>>> For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
>>>> there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
>>>
>>> that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
>>> women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
>>
>>
>>It's curious that you can dismiss someone with the label of "hater" and
>>then specify which groups will be subject of their prejudices.
>
>A classic partisan lefty democrat way of thinking. The irony of their
>own bigotry would never occur to them. This is an example why I have
>no time for either side of the political fence, they are both
>unbalanced in their outlook and are really just two sides of the same
>coin.
>
>> I have
>>always been interesting that some supposedly open minded people have no
>>problems dismissing members of various groups, institutions or
>>occupations as being racist.
>
>Yep. You see it all the time.
I mentioned no political party, gender, group or object of hate. I
meant what I said. People who talk like that about women hate in
general. They feel put upon and insignificant and try to bolster
themselves by putting someone else down.
Janet US

========

They are trying to twist what you actually said.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"U.S. Janet B." wrote in message
...

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 15:13:28 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:59:33 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>>On 1/2/2017 8:55 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>> Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If women can be "bitches," what is the equivalent term for men?
>>>>
>>>> "arrogant assholes" and sadly there seem to be many of them.
>>>>
>>>> You would be horrified to hear some of the 'man-talk' I
>>>> often hear at work. This is what I get for being a blue-collar
>>>> worker and dealing with the low-life of America.
>>>>
>>>> Racist, sexist... you name it. I hear it all the time.
>>>>
>>>
>>>It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
>>>walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
>>>For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
>>>there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
>>
>>that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
>>women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
>>Janet US
>
>Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>imaginable.

Foul language is not the issue, putting women or people down by
calling them names or objectifying them is the issue. People who do
that have no respect or liking for others. They make those remarks to
make themselves feel superior.
Janet US
===========

Yes.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 1/2/2017 3:04 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 06:34:36 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 9:22:05 AM UTC-5, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2017-01-02 6:48 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>> On Sunday, January 1, 2017 at 6:13:45 PM UTC-5, Jill McQuown wrote:
>>>>> On 1/1/2017 2:48 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 13:28:30 -0500, jmcquown >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/31/2016 12:20 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hence my surprise that so many women voted for
>>>>>>>>>>>> President P. Grabber, which tells us that more American women than we
>>>>>>>>>>>> thought like to be grabbed by the pussy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you got out more you'd realize how many women consider it a
>>>>>>>> compliment *for the man they're with+ to fondle their genitals... beats
>>>>>>>> the heck out of lonely Saturday nights with their dildo and case of
>>>>>>>> Energizer Bunnies.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Excuse me?! Don't talk as if you know or have known all women. We do
>>>>>>> not necessarily need a man or a dildo to be happy.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I cite a situation (I've mentioned it before) in which a former Dallas
>>>>>>> Cowboy football player (Charlie Waters) wandered into the Memphis area.
>>>>>>> (I think he had become an orthodontist or some such thing living in
>>>>>>> Mississippi at the time.) He encountered me in my neighborhood pub in
>>>>>>> Tennessee while I was having an after work drink with some girlfriends.
>>>>>>> He had a superbowl ring and thought he was hot shit. He walked up,
>>>>>>> turned my chair around and pulled me towards his crotch. Excuse me?!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry, that's NOT the way to approach a woman and who gives a **** if
>>>>>>> you played football? A male friend of mine walked over, tapped him on
>>>>>>> the shoulder and said, "You're messing with the wrong woman." He
>>>>>>> certainly was.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Women do NOT enjoy being groped in public by strange men or even rich
>>>>>>> men. Not unless they are hookers. Most women are not hookers.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You miss the point and twist the facts, I didn't say by strange men, I
>>>>>> said by "the man they are with".
>>>>>
>>>>> And you said "you'd realize how many women consider it a
>>>>> >>> compliment *for the man they're with+ to fondle their genitals".
>>>>> Sorry, even if you're on a date with someone most women do NOT expect
>>>>> the guy to fondle their genitals nor do they consider it a "compliment".
>>>>> It's rude and crude.
>>>>
>>>> Even my husband doesn't just grab me. He makes eye contact to see if
>>>> I want to be grabbed.
>>>>
>>>
>>> How can he make eye contact when he comes up behind you to grab? If I
>>> had a wife who didn't enjoy or even tolerate walk by grabs I probably
>>> would not still be married.
>>
>> Ah. There's something about my wiring. I'm very easily startled,
>> and I scream at the top of my lungs. Probably trying to warn the
>> rest of the tribe about the saber-toothed tiger before I die.
>>
>> He doesn't come up behind me to grab.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> I didn't think so... I haven't met a women yet who enjoyed a surprise
> grab. Men don't enjoy an unannounced grab either, at least this one
> doesn't.
>
Yet you seem to think women who agree to go on a date expect to be
fondled, as if it's the norm? Flip flop. Make up your mind.

Jill

On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
> imaginable.
>
Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.

Jill

On 2017-01-02 4:22 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:

> I mentioned no political party, gender, group or object of hate. I
> meant what I said. People who talk like that about women hate in
> general. They feel put upon and insignificant and try to bolster
> themselves by putting someone else down.

Really? You honestly believe that?

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:24:51 -0800, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>> If women can be "bitches," what is the equivalent term for men?
>>
>> N.
>
>
>Actually men are called little bitches, or whiny little bitches a lot these
>days, along with bitch boy.

"Bitch boy"... that sounds so ***. Are you sure you're not a *** guy?
It would make sense.

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:48:47 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:44:54 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:
>
>>On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:37:09 PM UTC-6, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:20:32 -0800 (PST), "
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >People were also fed up with the "Hope and Change" brought
>>> >to us by a Democratic community organizer.
>>>
>>> Just remember what it was you hoped for with Trump and the Republicans
>>> and see if you get what you thought you were voting for
>>>
>>>
>>I hoped nor expected anything from the Democratic party. But
>>there certainly will be change from the Republicans. However,
>>they need to remember who brought them to the dance and not have
>>amnesia once in power.
>
>I think your dance date is leaving with another partner

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1Kn8DSWQAAOtGs.jpg

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 4:32:53 PM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
>
> On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> > Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
> > their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
> > imaginable.
> >
> Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
> needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
> date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.
>
> Jill
>
>
BWAHAHAHAHAAAAAA, I think you nailed it, Jill!

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:08:22 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:48:47 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:44:54 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:37:09 PM UTC-6, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:20:32 -0800 (PST), "
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >People were also fed up with the "Hope and Change" brought
>>>> >to us by a Democratic community organizer.
>>>>
>>>> Just remember what it was you hoped for with Trump and the Republicans
>>>> and see if you get what you thought you were voting for
>>>>
>>>>
>>>I hoped nor expected anything from the Democratic party. But
>>>there certainly will be change from the Republicans. However,
>>>they need to remember who brought them to the dance and not have
>>>amnesia once in power.
>>
>>I think your dance date is leaving with another partner
>
>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1Kn8DSWQAAOtGs.jpg


That doesn't even deserve to be called an analogy.

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:14:52 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:08:22 +1100, Bruce >
>wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:48:47 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:44:54 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:37:09 PM UTC-6, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:20:32 -0800 (PST), "
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >People were also fed up with the "Hope and Change" brought
>>>>> >to us by a Democratic community organizer.
>>>>>
>>>>> Just remember what it was you hoped for with Trump and the Republicans
>>>>> and see if you get what you thought you were voting for
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>I hoped nor expected anything from the Democratic party. But
>>>>there certainly will be change from the Republicans. However,
>>>>they need to remember who brought them to the dance and not have
>>>>amnesia once in power.
>>>
>>>I think your dance date is leaving with another partner
>>
>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1Kn8DSWQAAOtGs.jpg
>
>
>That doesn't even deserve to be called an analogy.

Don't you think they're going to crash in the picture? Isn't that
strong enough?

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
> imaginable.
>
Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.

Jill

====================

+1 and I never use foul language either.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 3:13:37 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:59:33 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:19:52 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> >
> >>On 1/2/2017 8:55 AM, Gary wrote:
> >>> Nancy2 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> If women can be "bitches," what is the equivalent term for men?
> >>>
> >>> "arrogant assholes" and sadly there seem to be many of them.
> >>>
> >>> You would be horrified to hear some of the 'man-talk' I
> >>> often hear at work. This is what I get for being a blue-collar
> >>> worker and dealing with the low-life of America.
> >>>
> >>> Racist, sexist... you name it. I hear it all the time.
> >>>
> >>
> >>It is not just blue collar, it is all over. You won't hear it when you
> >>walk into the bank as a customer, but take a listen in the breakroom.
> >>For that matter, at the Home & School meeting at the church. Anywhere
> >>there is a group, there will be a couple of guys like that.
> >
> >that kind of person is a hater and I'll bet the talk isn't limited to
> >women but covers blacks, Mexicans, whoever.
> >Janet US
>
> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
> imaginable.

If I want to swear, I swear.

All women, or some women "powder their noses" together? ("Women" isn't
very specific.) If I need to take a ****, I just go by myself. I hate
it when someone talks to me in the bathroom.

Cindy Hamilton

On 1/3/2017 4:50 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news > On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>> imaginable.
>>
> Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
> needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
> date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.
>
> Jill
>
> ====================
>
> +1 and I never use foul language either.
>
I will use foul language if I get angry enough.

Jill

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 1/3/2017 4:50 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news > On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>> imaginable.
>>
> Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
> needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
> date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.
>
> Jill
>
> ====================
>
> +1 and I never use foul language either.
>
I will use foul language if I get angry enough.

Jill

=======================

Hey whatever you need to do) I must admit to one rude word but it is very
very rare )



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 1/3/2017 12:45 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >
> On 1/3/2017 4:50 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >> On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>>> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>>> imaginable.
>>>
>> Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
>> needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
>> date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.
>>
>> Jill
>>
>> ====================
>>
>> +1 and I never use foul language either.
>>
> I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> Jill
>
> =======================
>
> Hey whatever you need to do) I must admit to one rude word but it is
> very very rare )
>
>
>
Well... there was one time several years ago when I came out of a drug
store and found someone had driven into the side of my parked car.
Crumpled in the rear quarter panel and part of the door on the drivers
side. I was so shocked, without thinking I yelled, "WHO THE F*** HIT MY
CAR?!"

This little old lady was walking towards the entrance. She came walking
back saying, "It wasn't ME!" She pointed to a big old car, might have
been a Cadillac, parked a couple of spaces past mine. I'm quite sure it
*was* her. Really, if you didn't do something would you react like
that? A normal reaction would have been, "Oh dear, did someone hit your
car?"

I went back inside and asked if they have outside security cameras.
Nope. The good news is when I called my insurance company they told me
I could get an unwitnessed accident report form from the local Sheriff's
office. When I emailed them the completed form my insurance company
reduced my deductible by half for this incident. That worked out better
financially. But I never should have had to file a claim in the first
place.

Jill

On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:26:25 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:14:52 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:08:22 +1100, Bruce >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:48:47 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:44:54 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Saturday, December 31, 2016 at 8:37:09 PM UTC-6, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 16:20:32 -0800 (PST), "
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >People were also fed up with the "Hope and Change" brought
>>>>>> >to us by a Democratic community organizer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just remember what it was you hoped for with Trump and the Republicans
>>>>>> and see if you get what you thought you were voting for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>I hoped nor expected anything from the Democratic party. But
>>>>>there certainly will be change from the Republicans. However,
>>>>>they need to remember who brought them to the dance and not have
>>>>>amnesia once in power.
>>>>
>>>>I think your dance date is leaving with another partner
>>>
>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1Kn8DSWQAAOtGs.jpg
>>
>>
>>That doesn't even deserve to be called an analogy.
>
>Don't you think they're going to crash in the picture? Isn't that
>strong enough?

I get it, I just think it's a stupid analogy.

On Wed, 04 Jan 2017 07:17:37 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:26:25 +1100, Bruce >
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:14:52 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 03 Jan 2017 14:08:22 +1100, Bruce >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 09:48:47 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think your dance date is leaving with another partner
>>>>
>>>>https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C1Kn8DSWQAAOtGs.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>>That doesn't even deserve to be called an analogy.
>>
>>Don't you think they're going to crash in the picture? Isn't that
>>strong enough?
>
>I get it, I just think it's a stupid analogy.

You put your case so convincingly that I almost have to agree with
you.

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 1/3/2017 12:45 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >
> On 1/3/2017 4:50 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >> On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>>> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>>> imaginable.
>>>
>> Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you? I, for one, have never
>> needed to go "powder my nose" with another female in order to discuss my
>> date. You talk as if all women are still giddy teenagers.
>>
>> Jill
>>
>> ====================
>>
>> +1 and I never use foul language either.
>>
> I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> Jill
>
> =======================
>
> Hey whatever you need to do) I must admit to one rude word but it is
> very very rare )
>
>
>
Well... there was one time several years ago when I came out of a drug
store and found someone had driven into the side of my parked car.
Crumpled in the rear quarter panel and part of the door on the drivers
side. I was so shocked, without thinking I yelled, "WHO THE F*** HIT MY
CAR?!"

This little old lady was walking towards the entrance. She came walking
back saying, "It wasn't ME!" She pointed to a big old car, might have
been a Cadillac, parked a couple of spaces past mine. I'm quite sure it
*was* her. Really, if you didn't do something would you react like
that? A normal reaction would have been, "Oh dear, did someone hit your
car?"

I went back inside and asked if they have outside security cameras.
Nope. The good news is when I called my insurance company they told me
I could get an unwitnessed accident report form from the local Sheriff's
office. When I emailed them the completed form my insurance company
reduced my deductible by half for this incident. That worked out better
financially. But I never should have had to file a claim in the first
place.

Jill
============

That's the word ...

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>> On 1/2/2017 3:13 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> Women use much more foul language than men, that's why they go powder
>>> their noses together, to describe their date in the foulest terms
>>> imaginable.
>>>
>> Hang out in a lot of women's bathrooms, do you?

There were a few clubs I frequented in Brooklyn's Bensonhurst section,
that had their bathrooms wired for sound, the conversations were
monitored and when the conversation became raunchy the sound was piped
to the club's PA system... the mens room was typically quiet, men
don't converse while peeing, however the sounds from the ladies room
were outrageous and definitely not lady like. I'm positive there were
men in the audiance who were very embarrassed by the descriptives of
their um, equipment and its functionality or should I say non
functionality. I related this previously... I've no idea if these
clubs still exist... back then the legal drinking age in NY was 18.
There were several of these clubs all over NYC. People didn't go for
the food, the food was mostly chips, pretzels, and peanuts, at most
you could order a dawg or a burger and fries but hardly anyone did.
People went to drink booze and smoke, ashtrays were sardine and tuna
cans. Very little drugs then, hardly anyone smoked weed. They were
mostly hook-up clubs, they rarely checked IDs. A lot of the gals were
14, 15, and 16, they got in because they either had boobs or had
stuffed bras. The guys got in with a driver's license and back then
it didn't have a picture, could be your older brothers'. The bar's
decor was bras and panties found discarded in the ladies room that
were hung from the ceiling. These clubs featured raunch, nothing
sophisticated, but were always packed.

On 2017-01-03 7:24 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news

> I've no idea if these
> clubs still exist... back then the legal drinking age in NY was 18.
> There were several of these clubs all over NYC. People didn't go for
> the food, the food was mostly chips, pretzels, and peanuts, at most
> you could order a dawg or a burger and fries but hardly anyone did.
> People went to drink booze and smoke, ashtrays were sardine and tuna
> cans. Very little drugs then, hardly anyone smoked weed. They were
> mostly hook-up clubs, they rarely checked IDs. A lot of the gals were
> 14, 15, and 16, they got in because they either had boobs or had
> stuffed bras. The guys got in with a driver's license and back then
> it didn't have a picture, could be your older brothers'.



They actually checked IDs? When I was a teen the drinking age in NY
was 18 and it was 21 here in Ontario. All the teens from the Niagara
area used to head "over the river" on weekends. I started going over
when I was 15. A bunch of us went one Saturday night when three of us
were celebrating our birthdays. Two of us were turning 18 and one of
the girls with us was 15. Wally and I got ID'ed but she wasn't. It was
the first time for me to get IDed over there.

It was about 2 1/2 years later than the drinking age in Ontario dropped
to 18. My brother turned 18 two weeks later.

In article >, Ophelia
> wrote:

> "jmcquown" wrote in message news

> > I will use foul language if I get angry enough.

<F word with asterisks>

> That's the word ...

Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
wherever it went.

leo

On 2017-01-04 6:26 PM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> In article >, Ophelia
> > wrote:
>

> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
> wherever it went.
>
When I was a teen my parents agreed to take in a dog that had belonged
to the deceased aunt of a friend. He was a beautiful looking English
Spaniel who had a five point star on his head. He was named for a
comical Shakespeare character.... Puck. We had fun with that one.

On 2017-01-04 4:26 PM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> In article >, Ophelia
> > wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>
>>> I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> <F word with asterisks>
>
>> That's the word ...
>
> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
> dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
> That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
> word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
> there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
> I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
> works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
> nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
> wherever it went.
>
> leo
>
If my grandfather hit his thumb or did something that merited a swear
word, he'd say: "*********, and double and thripple it!"

"Leonard Blaisdell" > wrote in message
news:040120171526392706%

> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
> dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
> That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
> word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
> there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
> I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
> works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
> nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
> wherever it went.
>
> leo

LOL, so true.

Cheri

"Leonard Blaisdell" wrote in message
...

In article >, Ophelia
> wrote:

> "jmcquown" wrote in message news

> > I will use foul language if I get angry enough.

<F word with asterisks>

> That's the word ...

Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
wherever it went.

leo

=============================

It is very very rare for me to swear like that. It has to be an explosive
anger that triggers it.

I can't remember that last time.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"graham" wrote in message news
On 2017-01-04 4:26 PM, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> In article >, Ophelia
> > wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>
>>> I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> <F word with asterisks>
>
>> That's the word ...
>
> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
> dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
> That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
> word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
> there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
> I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
> works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
> nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
> wherever it went.
>
> leo
>
If my grandfather hit his thumb or did something that merited a swear
word, he'd say: "*********, and double and thripple it!"

===

lol

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 at 6:26:44 PM UTC-5, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> In article >, Ophelia
> > wrote:
>
> > "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>
> > > I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> <F word with asterisks>
>
> > That's the word ...
>
> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father.

The first time I came home from college, my mother used the
word in front of me. Color me surprised.

I use it like a comma. When something is badly broken, I
use it as every word in a complete sentence.

Cindy Hamilton

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> > Someone said: <F word with asterisks>


> The first time I came home from college, my mother used the
> word in front of me. Color me surprised.

I've never ever heard either of my parents say a bad word.
I'm not that pure though. heheh

>
> I use it like a comma. When something is badly broken, I
> use it as every word in a complete sentence.

LOL! If I heard someone use the F word as every word
in a sentence, I'd back off and leave them alone. lol

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Leonard Blaisdell" wrote in message
> ...
>
> In article >, Ophelia
> > wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>
>> > I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> <F word with asterisks>
>
>> That's the word ...
>
> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
> dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
> That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
> word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
> there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
> I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
> works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
> nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
> wherever it went.
>
> leo
>
> =============================
>
> It is very very rare for me to swear like that. It has to be an explosive
> anger that triggers it.
>
> I can't remember that last time.

I tend to swear when I'm by myself and things go wrong. I actually shock
myself sometimes. LOL

Cheri

On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 07:07:28 -0800, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>> "Leonard Blaisdell" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> In article >, Ophelia
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>>
>>> > I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>>
>> <F word with asterisks>
>>
>>> That's the word ...
>>
>> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
>> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
>> dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
>> That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
>> word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
>> there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
>> I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
>> works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
>> nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
>> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
>> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
>> wherever it went.
>>
>> leo
>>
>> =============================
>>
>> It is very very rare for me to swear like that. It has to be an explosive
>> anger that triggers it.
>>
>> I can't remember that last time.
>
> I tend to swear when I'm by myself and things go wrong. I actually shock
>myself sometimes. LOL
>
>Cheri

I'll bet yoose ladies use the F word in the bedroom, along with Me and
Harder!

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Leonard Blaisdell" wrote in message
> ...
>
> In article >, Ophelia
> > wrote:
>
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news
>
>> > I will use foul language if I get angry enough.
>
> <F word with asterisks>
>
>> That's the word ...
>
> Ladies! Ladies! I admit to knowing the bad word since I hit the
> playground, but I only used it once talking to my father. The only
> dirty phrase he ever used when furious was "son of a bitching *******".
> That's it. He never even broke the phrase apart. But knowing the big
> word, I used it once within his earshot at about fourteen. As I stood
> there dumbfounded and mortified, he suggested I increase my vocabulary.
> I did that, but there are special circumstances where only one word
> works. I see all the components of his worst phrase on commercial TV
> nowadays. I have to go to cable to hear most of mine.
> Since the word slides so easily off the tongue, I'm surprised people
> don't name their dog with it. That mutt would think it was popular
> wherever it went.
>
> leo
>
> =============================
>
> It is very very rare for me to swear like that. It has to be an explosive
> anger that triggers it.
>
> I can't remember that last time.

I tend to swear when I'm by myself and things go wrong. I actually shock
myself sometimes. LOL

Cheri

================

I guess if you are alone you are not shocking anyone else ... lol



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 2017-01-05 11:15 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 07:07:28 -0800, "Cheri" >
> I can't remember that last time.
>>
>> I tend to swear when I'm by myself and things go wrong. I actually shock
>> myself sometimes. LOL
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I'll bet yoose ladies use the F word in the bedroom, along with Me and
> Harder!
>


You are probably more used to"**** off. I'm tired."

On 2017-01-05, Dave Smith > wrote:

> On 2017-01-05 11:15 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

>> Harder!

> You are probably more used to"**** off. I'm tired."

I'm sorry, but I'm still having difficulty with the image of Shelley
and and his bedroom companion, "Harder". (shudder)

nb