TOAST CAUSES CANCER

but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day

http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html

"tert in seattle" wrote in message
...

TOAST CAUSES CANCER

but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day

http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html

===

<g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
... oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Ophelia wrote:
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>
> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>
> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
>===
>
><g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)

codswallop, that's the word I was looking for

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>
> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>
> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html

We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo restaurant famous.

http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>
> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>
> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> ===
>
> <g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)

For sure!

Cheri

"tert in seattle" > wrote in message
...
> Ophelia wrote:
>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>
>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>
>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>>===
>>
>><g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>
> codswallop, that's the word I was looking for


It's a great word!

Cheri

"tert in seattle" wrote in message
...

Ophelia wrote:
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>
> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>
> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
>===
>
><g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)

codswallop, that's the word I was looking for
==

Pleased to be of service <g>

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"tert in seattle" > wrote in message
...
> Ophelia wrote:
>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>
>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>
>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>>===
>>
>><g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>
> codswallop, that's the word I was looking for


It's a great word!

Cheri

===============

Then I give it to you freely and hope to see it used frequently ;-)



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>
> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>
> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html

We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
restaurant famous.

http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png


====

That's toast???


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>
> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>
> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> ===
>
> <g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)

For sure!

Cheri

====

It is often 'old codswallop' too ;-)



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:13:02 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
> > TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> >
> > but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> >
> > http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
> restaurant famous.
>
> http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png
>
>
> ====
>
> That's toast???

Well... It's toasted.

I've never been able to figure out why the diabetes rate in Hawaii
is only 8.5%. Everything they eat appears to be simple carbs.

Cindy Hamilton

"Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message
...

On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:13:02 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
> > TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> >
> > but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> >
> > http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
> restaurant famous.
>
> http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png
>
>
> ====
>
> That's toast???

Well... It's toasted.

I've never been able to figure out why the diabetes rate in Hawaii
is only 8.5%. Everything they eat appears to be simple carbs.

Cindy Hamilton

=================

I suppose there might be another reason for diabetes in that case?


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 14:06:22 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message
...
>
>On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:13:02 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
>> > TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>> >
>> > but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>> >
>> > http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
>> restaurant famous.
>>
>> http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png
>>
>> ====
>>
>> That's toast???
>
>Well... It's toasted.
>
>I've never been able to figure out why the diabetes rate in Hawaii
>is only 8.5%. Everything they eat appears to be simple carbs.
>
>Cindy Hamilton
>
>=================
>
>I suppose there might be another reason for diabetes in that case?

I'd much rather a Champagne Toast!

On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:13:02 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
> > TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> >
> > but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> >
> > http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
> restaurant famous.
>
> http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png
>
>
> ====
>
> That's toast???
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Indeed it is. The young folks think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread. It is big slices of Japanese bread that's been brushed with butter and toasted in the oven or fried on a griddle. It is then drizzled with honey and served with sliced banana, chocolate syrup, fruits, nuts, and practically anything. I've had it. It's pretty much toast. If you eat too much of the stuff, it'll probably kill you.

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 05:36:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:13:02 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
>> > TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>> >
>> > but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>> >
>> > http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
>> restaurant famous.
>>
>> http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png
>>
>>
>> ====
>>
>> That's toast???
>
>Well... It's toasted.
>
>I've never been able to figure out why the diabetes rate in Hawaii
>is only 8.5%. Everything they eat appears to be simple carbs.

"Here in Hawaii, nearly 600,000 people are living with prediabetes or
diabetes, affecting 1 in 3 individuals: over 154,000 people with
diabetes and an additional 442,000 with prediabetes. Diabetes is the
7th leading cause of death in Hawaii and nationwide.
<http://www.diabetes.org/in-my-community/local-offices/honolulu-hawaii/>

On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 09:35:47 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:13:02 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Monday, January 23, 2017 at 11:00:05 AM UTC-10, tert in seattle wrote:
>> > TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>> >
>> > but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>> >
>> > http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> We have real killer toast over here. It's the toast that made Shokudo
>> restaurant famous.
>>
>> http://www.honolulumagazine.com/Hono...sh_shokudo.png
>>
>>
>> ====
>>
>> That's toast???
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>Indeed it is. The young folks think it's the greatest thing since sliced bread.

It IS sliced bread.

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>
>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>
>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>
>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
>
> -sw

I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)

Ophelia wrote:
> "Cheri" wrote in message news >
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>
>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>
>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> ===
>>
>> <g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes and
>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>
> For sure!
>
> Cheri
>
>====
>
> It is often 'old codswallop' too ;-)


I've seen this old warmed-over codswallop before!

"tert in seattle" wrote in message
...

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>
>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>
>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>
>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>
> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
>
> -sw

I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)

=====

Ackkkkkkkkkk you are just so brave ...



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"tert in seattle" wrote in message
...

Ophelia wrote:
> "Cheri" wrote in message news >
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>
>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>
>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> ===
>>
>> <g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes
>> and
>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>
> For sure!
>
> Cheri
>
>====
>
> It is often 'old codswallop' too ;-)


I've seen this old warmed-over codswallop before!

=============

Can't say I have <g>



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:21:09 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>>
>>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>>
>>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>>
>>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>>
>>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
>>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
>>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
>>
>> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
>> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
>
> You can pretty much type in any food + "cancer" into google and find
> out that it causes cancer.
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...ut-butter.html
>
> -sw

Joe Jackson knew that way back in the '80s

Ophelia wrote:
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> Ophelia wrote:
>> "Cheri" wrote in message news >>
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>
>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>
>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> <g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes
>>> and
>>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>>
>> For sure!
>>
>> Cheri
>>
>>====
>>
>> It is often 'old codswallop' too ;-)
>
>
> I've seen this old warmed-over codswallop before!
>
>=============
>
> Can't say I have <g>

I swear I heard about the KILLER TOAST before, in the last year or two
(or three or four, I'm getting old)

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote in message news >
> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Ophelia wrote:
>>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>
>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>
>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>>
>>>===
>>>
>>><g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes
>>>and
>>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>>
>> codswallop, that's the word I was looking for
>
>
> It's a great word!
>
> Cheri
>
> ===============
>
> Then I give it to you freely and hope to see it used frequently ;-)

It's much better than *bullshit.* ;-)

Cheri

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>
>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>
>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>
>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
>>
>> -sw
>
> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
>
> =====
>
> Ackkkkkkkkkk you are just so brave ...

Much like me with burnt toast on occasion, I love it.

Cheri

"tert in seattle" wrote in message
...

Ophelia wrote:
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> Ophelia wrote:
>> "Cheri" wrote in message news >>
>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>
>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>
>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> <g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes
>>> and
>>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>>
>> For sure!
>>
>> Cheri
>>
>>====
>>
>> It is often 'old codswallop' too ;-)
>
>
> I've seen this old warmed-over codswallop before!
>
>=============
>
> Can't say I have <g>

I swear I heard about the KILLER TOAST before, in the last year or two
(or three or four, I'm getting old)

=====

I know the feeling <g>



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote in message news >
> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Ophelia wrote:
>>> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>
>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>
>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>>
>>>===
>>>
>>><g> We have been getting these warnings today. Toast, roast potatoes
>>>and
>>> .. oh I can't remember! Load of codswallop anyway)
>>
>> codswallop, that's the word I was looking for
>
>
> It's a great word!
>
> Cheri
>
> ===============
>
> Then I give it to you freely and hope to see it used frequently ;-)

It's much better than *bullshit.* ;-)

Cheri

====

LOL I can't argue with that))



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "tert in seattle" wrote in message
> ...
>
> Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
>>
>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
>>>
>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
>>>
>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
>>
>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
>>
>> -sw
>
> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
>
> =====
>
> Ackkkkkkkkkk you are just so brave ...

Much like me with burnt toast on occasion, I love it.

Cheri

=======================

Fortunately for me I don't like it burnt



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:20:06 PM UTC-8, tert in seattle wrote:
> Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:21:09 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> >
> >> Sqwertz wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> >>>>
> >>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> >>>>
> >>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
> >>>
> >>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
> >>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
> >>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
> >>
> >> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
> >> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
> >
> > You can pretty much type in any food + "cancer" into google and find
> > out that it causes cancer.
> >
> > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...ut-butter.html
> >
> > -sw
>
> Joe Jackson knew that way back in the '80s

LOL today in the NY Times Cooking section is a recipe for burned toast soup.

http://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1... nlid=23430587

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 6:20:27 AM UTC-10, ImStillMags wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:20:06 PM UTC-8, tert in seattle wrote:
> > Sqwertz wrote:
> > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:21:09 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sqwertz wrote:
> > >>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> > >>>>
> > >>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> > >>>>
> > >>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
> > >>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
> > >>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
> > >>
> > >> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
> > >> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
> > >
> > > You can pretty much type in any food + "cancer" into google and find
> > > out that it causes cancer.
> > >
> > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...ut-butter.html
> > >
> > > -sw
> >
> > Joe Jackson knew that way back in the '80s
>
> LOL today in the NY Times Cooking section is a recipe for burned toast soup.
>
> http://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1... nlid=23430587

That's just crazy enough to work. I'll have to make that one. Thanks. Bitter is the world's most dangerous flavor. OTOH, here's a dish that's popular over here.

http://dailycookingquest.com/by-cate...ack-bean-sauce

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:34:52 AM UTC-8, dsi1 wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 6:20:27 AM UTC-10, ImStillMags wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:20:06 PM UTC-8, tert in seattle wrote:
> > > Sqwertz wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:21:09 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Sqwertz wrote:
> > > >>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
> > > >>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
> > > >>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
> > > >>
> > > >> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
> > > >> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
> > > >
> > > > You can pretty much type in any food + "cancer" into google and find
> > > > out that it causes cancer.
> > > >
> > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...ut-butter.html
> > > >
> > > > -sw
> > >
> > > Joe Jackson knew that way back in the '80s
> >
> > LOL today in the NY Times Cooking section is a recipe for burned toast soup.
> >
> > http://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1... nlid=23430587
>
> That's just crazy enough to work. I'll have to make that one. Thanks. Bitter is the world's most dangerous flavor. OTOH, here's a dish that's popular over here.
>
> http://dailycookingquest.com/by-cate...ack-bean-sauce

There is a companion article about charred foods. Looks yummy to me.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/d...yt-region&_r=0

I make whole wheat toast pizza every other weekend, 2 slices for lunch and supper on sat and for lunch on sun, 6 slices total.

On 1/25/2017 2:07 PM, wrote:
> I make whole wheat toast pizza every other weekend, 2 slices for lunch and supper on sat and for lunch on sun, 6 slices total.
>

Why the **** do you think anyone here gives a flying ****, chief?

On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 7:36:09 AM UTC-10, ImStillMags wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 8:34:52 AM UTC-8, dsi1 wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 25, 2017 at 6:20:27 AM UTC-10, ImStillMags wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 4:20:06 PM UTC-8, tert in seattle wrote:
> > > > Sqwertz wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2017 20:21:09 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Sqwertz wrote:
> > > > >>> On Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:49 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> TOAST CAUSES CANCER
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> but only if you eat 320 slices of burnt toast a day
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> http://en.mogaznews.com/Health/345621.html
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I don't think a statistician is qualified to tell us how many pieces
> > > > >>> of toast we can eat a day without getting cancer. And does it really
> > > > >>> take a statistician to do 5th grade math?
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I am defiantly taunting fate right now by eating a piece of toast that
> > > > >> has peanut butter on it (made from roasted peanuts)
> > > > >
> > > > > You can pretty much type in any food + "cancer" into google and find
> > > > > out that it causes cancer.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/ar...ut-butter.html
> > > > >
> > > > > -sw
> > > >
> > > > Joe Jackson knew that way back in the '80s
> > >
> > > LOL today in the NY Times Cooking section is a recipe for burned toast soup.
> > >
> > > http://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1... nlid=23430587
> >
> > That's just crazy enough to work. I'll have to make that one. Thanks. Bitter is the world's most dangerous flavor. OTOH, here's a dish that's popular over here.
> >
> > http://dailycookingquest.com/by-cate...ack-bean-sauce
>
> There is a companion article about charred foods. Looks yummy to me.
>
> https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/24/d...yt-region&_r=0

It's an interesting idea. We are able to control heat to a fine degree and our vessels are so well crafted that burning, scorching. and charring, is seen as the sign of a junior cook. That's the breaks.

The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan. The old folks would eat that crusty stuff by pouring tea over it to soften. These days the old folks don't get any of that stuff and the young folks have never heard of it. The Korean mart that we went to on the weekend had bags of scorched, crispy, rice. I suppose you eat it like a potato chip. Interesting.

Tonight I had stuffed bitter melon. It was OK but not quite bitter enough for me. Perhaps I cooked to too long.

https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...OHAQ6QEl1JFw13

dsi1 wrote:
>
> The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan.

Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with lid and
timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the brown that
takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o

On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:11:36 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>dsi1 wrote:
>>
>> The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan.
>
>Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with lid and
>timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the brown that
>takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o

Nope, I have never messed up rice in the saucepan either. Dead easy.

On 1/26/2017 3:11 PM, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
>>
>> The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan.
>
> Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with lid and
> timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the brown that
> takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o
>
You and me both.

Jill

On 2017-01-26 5:45 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:11:36 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>
>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>> The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan.
>>
>> Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with lid and
>> timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the brown that
>> takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o
>
> Nope, I have never messed up rice in the saucepan either. Dead easy.
>
I just finished supper and had rice cooked the way I always do. I use
one part rice and two parts water and a good pinch of salt. I bring it
to a boil, put the top one and set the timer for 15 minutes. Then I take
it off the heat, fluff it up with a fork and put the top back on to keep
it warm until serving. It always works.

On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan.
>
> Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with lid and
> timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the brown that
> takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o

You must be lucky in the extreme. I used to scorch the rice all the time before our family got an automatic rice cooker. My recommendation is you try out your luck in Vegas.

Asian cultures will be quite familiar with this stuff. Perhaps white folks are incapable of burning rice. That's OK, I can't make mashed potatoes so I'd call it a fair trade.

http://www.bonappetit.com/test-kitch...cle/burnt-rice

>http://www.halifax.ca/transit/On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 10:58:18 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 15:52:38 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>wrote:
>
>>On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>> >
>>> > The advent of the automatic rice cooker meant that we no longer got the scorched rice on the bottom of the pan.
>>>
>>> Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with lid and
>>> timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the brown that
>>> takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o
>>
>>You must be lucky in the extreme. I used to scorch the rice all the time before our family got an automatic rice cooker. My recommendation is you try out your luck in Vegas.
>>
>>Asian cultures will be quite familiar with this stuff. Perhaps white folks are incapable of burning rice. That's OK, I can't make mashed potatoes so I'd call it a fair trade.
>
>Racial stereotyping!

Or something. I cook my rice the way a Chinese cook taught me and the
way most of my Chinese friends do, a couple have rice cookers but the
rest use the saucepan method.

On 2017-01-26 6:52 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, January 26, 2017 at 10:13:17 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
>
>> Interesting. I've always cooked my rice in a small saucepan with
>> lid and timed. I have never scorched rice...ever. Not white or the
>> brown that takes longer to cook. Guess I'm just lucky, eh? :-o
>
> You must be lucky in the extreme. I used to scorch the rice all the
> time before our family got an automatic rice cooker. My
> recommendation is you try out your luck in Vegas.
>


There is no luck involved. Use high heat to get it boiling, then turn
it down to low. You don't need the burner to be any hotter than what it
takes to keep it at a low boil.






> Asian cultures will be quite familiar with this stuff. Perhaps white
> folks are incapable of burning rice. That's OK, I can't make mashed
> potatoes so I'd call it a fair trade.
>
> http://www.bonappetit.com/test-kitch...cle/burnt-rice
>