"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 11:28:26 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "Brooklyn1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:31:50 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi1ahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 10:27:15 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> >> dsi1 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 9:50:18 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> >> > > dsi1 wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > What I won't go over again is the subject of animal fats. As far
> >> > > > as
> >> > > > olive oil goes, I pretty much said all I'm going to say about
> >> > > > that.
> >> > > > The only thing left to discuss is toilets.
> >> > >
> >> > > Discussions about pooping are always interesting, imo. :-D
> >> >
> >> > Especially it it's ferret poop?
> >>
> >> Boy o boy could I tell some stories about ferret poopies. heheh
> >
> >I'm more interested in plumbing than poop.
> >Unfortunately, sometimes they go hand in hand.
>
> Yoose down under peeps do the same as moozlums, yoose poop in your
> hands to save on TP.
>
> =====
>
> Hawaii is 'down under'???
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

My guess is that he means the Southern hemisphere. That would be wrong. I'm
glad we don't live in the South Pacific so we don't have to have our maps
upside down. That would just be confusing. Those guys down under rotate in a
clockwise direction which explains a lot. They also travel in the opposite
direction around the sun from us Americans. Most unfortunate!

====

Oh dear <g>

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but would like to try it.

Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?

N.

"Nancy2" wrote in message
...

Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?

N.

=====

Yes, that too

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "Nancy2" wrote in message
> ...
>
> Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?
>
> N.
>
> =====
>
> Yes, that too
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Don't they also call it "room 100?"

In article >,
Thomas > wrote:

> 200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but would
> like to try it.

<http://people.howstuffworks.com/prison-toilet-wine.htm>. There was
some mention of hush puppies upthread. And yes, I'm trolling.

leo

On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:09:29 PM UTC-6, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>
> <http://people.howstuffworks.com/prison-toilet-wine.htm>. There was
> some mention of hush puppies upthread. And yes, I'm trolling.
>
> leo
>
>
When you get that new toilet installed let us know how you like it
after you've had it about a week, please.

In article >,
"> wrote:

> When you get that new toilet installed let us know how you like it
> after you've had it about a week, please

I expect them to pull out the old toilet and condemn the house, but
we'll see. I'm a cynic. I'll let you know a week from Monday. I was
encouraged by Ed's response.

leo

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "Nancy2" wrote in message
> ...
>
> Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?
>
> N.
>
> =====
>
> Yes, that too
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk


Don't they also call it "room 100?"

=====

That one is new to me)


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>
> In article >,
> "> wrote:
>
> > When you get that new toilet installed let us know how you like it
> > after you've had it about a week, please
>
> I expect them to pull out the old toilet and condemn the house, but
> we'll see.

lol (eh-oh)

I've got one of the original low flush toilets. It's a long way
down to sit on that short one.

In article >,
says...
>
> On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?
> >
> > N.
> >
> > =====
> >
> > Yes, that too
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> Don't they also call it "room 100?"

No, never heard it.

Janet UK

On 2/3/2017 4:55 PM, Thomas wrote:
> 200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but would like to try it.
>
You can find a ton of them online. (I avoid the ones that say add
sugar.) This is the basis for most of them:

1 cup yellow cornmeal
1/4 cup all-purpose flour
1-1/2 teaspoons baking powder
1/2 teaspoon salt
1 egg, lightly beaten
3/4 cup milk
1 small onion, finely chopped
Oil for deep-fat frying

Combine the dry ingredients. Add the egg, milk and onion and stir it
all together until you have a fairly thick batter. Drop by teaspoonfuls
into hot fat (oil, lard, whatever) and cook until nicely browned. Drain
well.

They're usually served with fried fish.

Jill

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 2/3/2017 4:55 PM, Thomas wrote:
> 200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but
> would like to try it.
>
You can find a ton of them online. (I avoid the ones that say add
sugar.) This is the basis for most of them:

1 cup yellow cornmeal
1/4 cup all-purpose flour
1-1/2 teaspoons baking powder
1/2 teaspoon salt
1 egg, lightly beaten
3/4 cup milk
1 small onion, finely chopped
Oil for deep-fat frying

Combine the dry ingredients. Add the egg, milk and onion and stir it
all together until you have a fairly thick batter. Drop by teaspoonfuls
into hot fat (oil, lard, whatever) and cook until nicely browned. Drain
well.

They're usually served with fried fish.

Jill

===

I used exactly that recipe and it has now become a favourite



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 2/5/2017 9:29 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >
> On 2/3/2017 4:55 PM, Thomas wrote:
>> 200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but
>> would like to try it.
>>
> You can find a ton of them online. (I avoid the ones that say add
> sugar.) This is the basis for most of them:
>
> 1 cup yellow cornmeal
> 1/4 cup all-purpose flour
> 1-1/2 teaspoons baking powder
> 1/2 teaspoon salt
> 1 egg, lightly beaten
> 3/4 cup milk
> 1 small onion, finely chopped
> Oil for deep-fat frying
>
> Combine the dry ingredients. Add the egg, milk and onion and stir it
> all together until you have a fairly thick batter. Drop by teaspoonfuls
> into hot fat (oil, lard, whatever) and cook until nicely browned. Drain
> well.
>
> They're usually served with fried fish.
>
> Jill
>
> ===
>
> I used exactly that recipe and it has now become a favourite
>
>
>
Hopefully Thomas will come back and read this. The thread did drift
into weird areas having to do with toilets. LOL

Jill

Gary wrote:
>Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>> <itsjoannotjoann wrote:
>>
>> > When you get that new toilet installed let us know how you like it
>> > after you've had it about a week, please
>>
>> I expect them to pull out the old toilet and condemn the house, but
>> we'll see.
>
>lol (eh-oh)
>
>I've got one of the original low flush toilets. It's a long way
>down to sit on that short one.

Something here might help:
https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_s...d=7M6REM1UZK57
https://www.walmart.com/ip/Medline-R...t-Seat/7983656

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 2/5/2017 9:29 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >
> On 2/3/2017 4:55 PM, Thomas wrote:
>> 200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but
>> would like to try it.
>>
> You can find a ton of them online. (I avoid the ones that say add
> sugar.) This is the basis for most of them:
>
> 1 cup yellow cornmeal
> 1/4 cup all-purpose flour
> 1-1/2 teaspoons baking powder
> 1/2 teaspoon salt
> 1 egg, lightly beaten
> 3/4 cup milk
> 1 small onion, finely chopped
> Oil for deep-fat frying
>
> Combine the dry ingredients. Add the egg, milk and onion and stir it
> all together until you have a fairly thick batter. Drop by teaspoonfuls
> into hot fat (oil, lard, whatever) and cook until nicely browned. Drain
> well.
>
> They're usually served with fried fish.
>
> Jill
>
> ===
>
> I used exactly that recipe and it has now become a favourite
>
>
>
Hopefully Thomas will come back and read this. The thread did drift
into weird areas having to do with toilets. LOL

Jill

====

Thread drift is a given, especially when it runs for a while

We will see if he comes back for the recipe ... or .... someone who just
wants to complain about the thread drift

Anyway if he does return, you have provided it and I have praised it!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 10:12:33 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 2/5/2017 9:29 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>> "jmcquown" wrote in message news >>
>> On 2/3/2017 4:55 PM, Thomas wrote:
>>> 200 posts. Can a recipe be pointed to? I do not think i missed it but
>>> would like to try it.
>>>
>> You can find a ton of them online. (I avoid the ones that say add
>> sugar.) This is the basis for most of them:
>>
>> 1 cup yellow cornmeal
>> 1/4 cup all-purpose flour
>> 1-1/2 teaspoons baking powder
>> 1/2 teaspoon salt
>> 1 egg, lightly beaten
>> 3/4 cup milk
>> 1 small onion, finely chopped
>> Oil for deep-fat frying
>>
>> Combine the dry ingredients. Add the egg, milk and onion and stir it
>> all together until you have a fairly thick batter. Drop by teaspoonfuls
>> into hot fat (oil, lard, whatever) and cook until nicely browned. Drain
>> well.
>>
>> They're usually served with fried fish.
>>
>> Jill
>>
>> ===
>>
>> I used exactly that recipe and it has now become a favourite
>>
>>
>>
>Hopefully Thomas will come back and read this. The thread did drift
>into weird areas having to do with toilets. LOL
>
>Jill

After hushpuppies toilets are mandatory, laxatives and plungers too!
LOL

Ophelia wrote:
>
> "jmcquown" wrote:
> Hopefully Thomas will come back and read this. The thread did drift
> into weird areas having to do with toilets. LOL
>
> Jill
>
> ====
>
> Thread drift is a given, especially when it runs for a while
>
> We will see if he comes back for the recipe ... or .... someone who just
> wants to complain about the thread drift
>
> Anyway if he does return, you have provided it and I have praised it!

Yeah like we really give a crap about "Thomas." LOL
He found 200 posts in the thread, he could have started at the
beginning and found the recipe quicker than asking about it here.

Screw him! ;-D (ps - just joking you here, Tommy-boy)

Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 11:28:26 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "Brooklyn1" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 12:31:50 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <dsi1ahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 10:27:15 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
>> >> dsi1 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Thursday, February 2, 2017 at 9:50:18 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
>> >> > > dsi1 wrote:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > What I won't go over again is the subject of animal fats. As far
>> >> > > > as
>> >> > > > olive oil goes, I pretty much said all I'm going to say about
>> >> > > > that.
>> >> > > > The only thing left to discuss is toilets.
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Discussions about pooping are always interesting, imo. :-D
>> >> >
>> >> > Especially it it's ferret poop?
>> >>
>> >> Boy o boy could I tell some stories about ferret poopies. heheh
>> >
>> >I'm more interested in plumbing than poop.
>> >Unfortunately, sometimes they go hand in hand.
>>
>> Yoose down under peeps do the same as moozlums, yoose poop in your
>> hands to save on TP.
>>
>> =====
>>
>> Hawaii is 'down under'???
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> My guess is that he means the Southern hemisphere. That would be wrong. I'm
> glad we don't live in the South Pacific so we don't have to have our maps
> upside down. That would just be confusing. Those guys down under rotate in a
> clockwise direction which explains a lot. They also travel in the opposite
> direction around the sun from us Americans. Most unfortunate!
>
>====
>
> Oh dear <g>

it's a topsy turvy world!

Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> Gary wrote:
> >Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> >> <itsjoannotjoann wrote:
> >>
> >> > When you get that new toilet installed let us know how you like it
> >> > after you've had it about a week, please
> >>
> >> I expect them to pull out the old toilet and condemn the house, but
> >> we'll see.
> >
> >lol (eh-oh)
> >
> >I've got one of the original low flush toilets. It's a long way
> >down to sit on that short one.
>
> Something here might help:
> https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_s...d=7M6REM1UZK57
> https://www.walmart.com/ip/Medline-R...t-Seat/7983656

Thanks Sheldon but I don't have any problem now with the very low
toilet.
It was just something that I've noticed. It a poc, imo.

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 1:00:28 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?
> >
> > N.
> >
> > =====
> >
> > Yes, that too
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>
> Don't they also call it "room 100?"
>
> =====
>
> That one is new to me)
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

That's too bad. It means one can't have a 99 in room 100.

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 3:21:59 AM UTC-10, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> dsi10yahoo.com says...
> >
> > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water closet?
> > >
> > > N.
> > >
> > > =====
> > >
> > > Yes, that too
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> >
> > Don't they also call it "room 100?"
>
> No, never heard it.
>
> Janet UK

I must have heard that one in a dream. :|

On 2/5/2017 11:33 AM, Gary wrote:
> Yeah like we really give a crap about "Thomas." LOL
> He found 200 posts in the thread, he could have started at the
> beginning and found the recipe quicker than asking about it here.
>
Google groups isn't so great about that. Yet another reason not to use
it. (dsi1 seems to think we will ALL be ruled by Google. Wrong, hawaii
boy!)

I gave Thomas credit for at least not responding to a 20 year old post. Heh.

Jill

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 1:00:28 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water
> > closet?
> >
> > N.
> >
> > =====
> >
> > Yes, that too
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>
> Don't they also call it "room 100?"
>
> =====
>
> That one is new to me)
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

That's too bad. It means one can't have a 99 in room 100.

====

Dunno about you but I can't say I would be thrilled with 99 rooms ...



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-5, Jill McQuown wrote:
> > >
> Hopefully Thomas will come back and read this. The thread did drift
> into weird areas having to do with toilets. LOL
>
> Jill

I appreciate it. I did not want just any looked up recipe.

"Thomas" wrote in message
...

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 10:12:37 AM UTC-5, Jill McQuown wrote:
> > >
> Hopefully Thomas will come back and read this. The thread did drift
> into weird areas having to do with toilets. LOL
>
> Jill

I appreciate it. I did not want just any looked up recipe.

====

I hope you try it. It was completely new to me and we love it

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 9:21:09 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 1:00:28 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water
> > > closet?
> > >
> > > N.
> > >
> > > =====
> > >
> > > Yes, that too
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> >
> >
> > Don't they also call it "room 100?"
> >
> > =====
> >
> > That one is new to me)
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> That's too bad. It means one can't have a 99 in room 100.
>
> ====
>
> Dunno about you but I can't say I would be thrilled with 99 rooms ...
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

I'm thinking that a "99" is a soft serve ice cream cone with a wafer stuck in it. OTOH, I might be that I dreamed that one up too. I may need professional help.

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 9:21:09 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 1:00:28 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water
> > > closet?
> > >
> > > N.
> > >
> > > =====
> > >
> > > Yes, that too
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> >
> >
> > Don't they also call it "room 100?"
> >
> > =====
> >
> > That one is new to me)
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> That's too bad. It means one can't have a 99 in room 100.
>
> ====
>
> Dunno about you but I can't say I would be thrilled with 99 rooms ...
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

I'm thinking that a "99" is a soft serve ice cream cone with a wafer stuck
in it. OTOH, I might be that I dreamed that one up too. I may need
professional help.

====

No, you are quite correct, although it is not a wafer it is a chocolate
flake)


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Flake

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:01:58 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"dsi1" wrote in message
...
>
>I'm thinking that a "99" is a soft serve ice cream cone with a wafer stuck
>in it. OTOH, I might be that I dreamed that one up too. I may need
>professional help.
>
>====
>
>No, you are quite correct, although it is not a wafer it is a chocolate
>flake)

That's very diplomatic. First you say he's correct and then you
correct him

=====

He was correct about the main point ie 'soft serve ice cream cone' the wafer
was not really important.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 12:02:14 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 9:21:09 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 1:00:28 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water
> > > > closet?
> > > >
> > > > N.
> > > >
> > > > =====
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that too
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> > >
> > >
> > > Don't they also call it "room 100?"
> > >
> > > =====
> > >
> > > That one is new to me)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> >
> > That's too bad. It means one can't have a 99 in room 100.
> >
> > ====
> >
> > Dunno about you but I can't say I would be thrilled with 99 rooms ...
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> I'm thinking that a "99" is a soft serve ice cream cone with a wafer stuck
> in it. OTOH, I might be that I dreamed that one up too. I may need
> professional help.
>
> ====
>
> No, you are quite correct, although it is not a wafer it is a chocolate
> flake)
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Flake
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

I have had the Flake bar. It is interesting. The crumbly chocolate reminds me of old chocolate. The Aero bar is similar. The don't typically sell these products around here. I could probably simulate a 99 by sticking a Flake in a McDonald's soft serve cone. First I have to find a Flake bar.

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Wednesday, February 8, 2017 at 12:02:14 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 9:21:09 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > On Sunday, February 5, 2017 at 1:00:28 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > > On Saturday, February 4, 2017 at 11:53:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > > > "Nancy2" wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Back in the day, didn't the Brits call them "the W.C.," for water
> > > > closet?
> > > >
> > > > N.
> > > >
> > > > =====
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that too
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> > >
> > >
> > > Don't they also call it "room 100?"
> > >
> > > =====
> > >
> > > That one is new to me)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> >
> > That's too bad. It means one can't have a 99 in room 100.
> >
> > ====
> >
> > Dunno about you but I can't say I would be thrilled with 99 rooms ...
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> I'm thinking that a "99" is a soft serve ice cream cone with a wafer stuck
> in it. OTOH, I might be that I dreamed that one up too. I may need
> professional help.
>
> ====
>
> No, you are quite correct, although it is not a wafer it is a chocolate
> flake)
>
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/99_Flake
>

I have had the Flake bar. It is interesting. The crumbly chocolate reminds
me of old chocolate. The Aero bar is similar. The don't typically sell these
products around here. I could probably simulate a 99 by sticking a Flake in
a McDonald's soft serve cone. First I have to find a Flake bar.
===

Good luck)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 13:03:19 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Wed, 8 Feb 2017 10:01:58 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>"dsi1" wrote in message
...
>>
>>I'm thinking that a "99" is a soft serve ice cream cone with a wafer stuck
>>in it. OTOH, I might be that I dreamed that one up too. I may need
>>professional help.
>>
>>====
>>
>>No, you are quite correct, although it is not a wafer it is a chocolate
>>flake)
>
>That's very diplomatic. First you say he's correct and then you
>correct him
>
>=====
>
>He was correct about the main point ie 'soft serve ice cream cone' the wafer
>was not really important.