 |
|
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 12:34:22 PM UTC-4, sf wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:28:58 +1000, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >> > There are more ways to control pollution. Even the Chinese have begin >> > to realise that. Unfortunately you have a president who doesn't. >> >> What the naysayers can't get through their thick skulls is sure, >> climate change might be inevitable, but humans were speeding up the >> process. >> http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/health...layer-healing/ >> >> https://www.nasa.gov/feature/Goddard...-moderate-size > >No matter which side of the AGW debate a person accepts, it seems >prudent to cut back on the burning, chopping down, babymaking, >et flaming cetera. Despite my skepticism about alternative >fuels, we should get cranking on them before the last drop >of oil disappears into somebody's limousine. > >Cindy Hamilton Users don't want their ability to use curtailed. Me, me, me, me, etc., Janet US |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:42:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 12:34:22 PM UTC-4, sf wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:28:58 +1000, Bruce > >> wrote: >> >> > There are more ways to control pollution. Even the Chinese have begin >> > to realise that. Unfortunately you have a president who doesn't. >> >> What the naysayers can't get through their thick skulls is sure, >> climate change might be inevitable, but humans were speeding up the >> process. >> http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/01/health...layer-healing/ >> >> https://www.nasa.gov/feature/Goddard...-moderate-size > >No matter which side of the AGW debate a person accepts, it seems >prudent to cut back on the burning, chopping down, babymaking, >et flaming cetera. Despite my skepticism about alternative >fuels, we should get cranking on them before the last drop >of oil disappears into somebody's limousine. Whole countries are in the process of switching to alternative fuels. The US will be one of the last in the western world, but even they will do it. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:31:08 -0600, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote: >On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > wrote: > >>On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:26:05 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote: >snip >>> >>> >>> Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high. >>> >>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >> >>Hooray! I beat the odds. It was a tough gig being an unwed >>mother in 1957, and I've always admired mine. >> >>Cindy Hamilton > >I want to reply but I can't think of anything pungent enough to cover >what I think of these hidebound, cement-brained, better-than-thou, >sainted Pharisees. "Don't have children if you can't look after them" sounds very reasonable to me. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-18 4:05 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 12:10:12 -0400, wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:28:10 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> There have always been masses who chose >> to believe some fercocktah concept to explain that which they don't >> know. that's how the concepts of different god(s) and religion(s) >> ocurred, and in every part of this planet among peoples who had no >> interaction with or knowledge of each other, and of course out of fear >> and to control. >> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nebula > > Top scientists, like who? In what fields? How old were they? What > industry were they representing? The same can be asked about the claims of the number of scientists who are convinced that climate change caused by humans.Sure they are scientists, but most of them are in other fields. Most biologists, chemists, physicists and geneticists have no more expertise in the field of climatology that you or I. The last time I checked, not all climatologists were convinced. Political correctness has reared it's ugly head in the issue. Some people dare not speak out on climate change for fear of being ostracized from the academic community. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" > > wrote: >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old > fart Reagan Republican, aren't you?  You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay to support those others. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-18 4:31 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:28:10 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2017-04-18 6:20 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: >>>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 22:55:00 -0400, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:55:53 +1000, Bruce > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:08:09 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, yes! Old style freon. That would be F-11, F-12 and the rest of the >>>>>>> chlorofluorocarbons. I lost my aerosol chemist career in 1977 because >>>>>>> of government promoted fears that they caused global --cooling--! >>>>>>> It was quite the fright. Time Magazine had it on the cover! Look it up. >>>>>>> Now purely government funded research promotes global warming for us to >>>>>>> froth over. I'm cynical. Ninety eight percent of climatologists agree >>>>>>> with the current hysteria. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hmmm... 98% of scientists versus Leonard Blaisdell. Who to believe? >>>>>> Decisions, decisions. >>>>> >>>>> We have miniscule control over our climate considering climate is >>>>> dependant on solar activity... to date no one has come up with a >>>>> method to control solar activity, which is a good thing or some nut >>>>> would destroy everything. The best we can do is heat our homes on >>>>> cold days and cool our homes on hot days... outdoors we can dress more >>>>> warmly in winter, or find a shady spot in summer. The only climatic >>>>> control we can enforce is the level of polution, and that is totally >>>>> dependant on population... >>>> >>>> There are more ways to control pollution. Even the Chinese have begin >>>> to realise that. Unfortunately you have a president who doesn't. >>> >>> The President has relatively little control over what happens in this >>> country, by design. >>> >>> Place your blame on Americans (like me) who want bigass SUVs, >>> air-conditioning, and beef. (Although I don't actually eat very >>> much beef.) Let's also include the corn industry, who have >>> managed to introduce their products into the food supply at >>> every level. >>> >> I wonder what kind of SUVs that had that caused the the reversal of the >> last Ice Age. About 15,000 years ago the glaciers extended almost to my >> back yard. Just a mile north of me is a kame, a pile of sand and gravel >> that was deposited there by the glacier. > > Just because natural climate changes occur, doesn't mean the current > one isn't caused by man. That may be true, but one of the things they are pointing out is the receding polar ice cap. It has been receding for 15,000 years. There have been several ice ages, and they happened without the intervention of man. Or.... maybe former societies causes climate change that let to the receding ice caps which then recovered. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >> > wrote: > >>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >> >> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? > >You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >to support those others. Asshole |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:51:42 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote: >On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith > wrote: > >>On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >>> > wrote: >> >>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>> >>> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >>> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? >> >>You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >>leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >>who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >>queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >>out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >>is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >>to support those others. > > >Asshole shrug |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:51:42 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote: >On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith > wrote: > >>On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >>> > wrote: >> >>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>> >>> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >>> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? >> >>You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >>leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >>who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >>queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >>out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >>is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >>to support those others. > > >Asshole He's right. Don't have children if you can't afford them. Don't have four children if you can't even afford one. Improve your situation first. This applies equally to men and women. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 4/18/2017 4:31 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> Place your blame on Americans (like me) who want bigass SUVs, >>> air-conditioning, and beef. (Although I don't actually eat very >>> much beef.) Let's also include the corn industry, who have >>> managed to introduce their products into the food supply at >>> every level. >>> >> I wonder what kind of SUVs that had that caused the the reversal of the >> last Ice Age. About 15,000 years ago the glaciers extended almost to my >> back yard. Just a mile north of me is a kame, a pile of sand and gravel >> that was deposited there by the glacier. > > Just because natural climate changes occur, doesn't mean the current > one isn't caused by man. > Of course that has been climate change and in both directions. I just cannot believe we can burn all the fuels we do every day and not expect at least minimal change. We also have a lot of people, plowed fields, cow farts, industry, decaying garbage, blacktop, black roofs, that did not exist a short time ago. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-18 6:51 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >>> > wrote: >> >>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>> >>> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >>> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? >> >> You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >> leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >> who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >> queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >> out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >> is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >> to support those others. > > > Asshole Idiot. > |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-18 7:04 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:51:42 -0400, Boron Elgar > > wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >>>> > wrote: >>> >>>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>>> >>>> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >>>> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? >>> >>> You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >>> leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >>> who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >>> queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >>> out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >>> is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >>> to support those others. >> >> >> Asshole > > He's right. Don't have children if you can't afford them. Don't have > four children if you can't even afford one. Improve your situation > first. This applies equally to men and women. She probably knows that and could not deny it, so she resorted to name calling. > |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:11:09 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2017-04-18 7:04 PM, Bruce wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:51:42 -0400, Boron Elgar >> > wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >>>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >>>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>>>> >>>>> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >>>>> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? >>>> >>>> You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >>>> leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >>>> who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >>>> queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >>>> out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >>>> is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >>>> to support those others. >>> >>> >>> Asshole >> >> He's right. Don't have children if you can't afford them. Don't have >> four children if you can't even afford one. Improve your situation >> first. This applies equally to men and women. > >She probably knows that and could not deny it, so she resorted to name >calling. I don't understand how anyone could disagree. The need for name calling escapes me even more. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-18 8:12 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:11:09 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2017-04-18 7:04 PM, Bruce wrote: >>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 18:51:42 -0400, Boron Elgar >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:41:04 -0400, Dave Smith >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2017-04-18 4:09 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: >>>>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>>>>> >>>>>> Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" You're an old >>>>>> fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? >>>>> >>>>> You must think there is some truth to the notion or you would not have >>>>> leapt to that conclusion. I am all for helping people in our society >>>>> who need help, but I am sadly aware of the fact that there are welfare >>>>> queens, the sort of people who have no greater aspirations that to pop >>>>> out a few kids, often by different fathers, and to live off welfare. It >>>>> is grossly unfair to the working people of our society who have to pay >>>>> to support those others. >>>> >>>> >>>> Asshole >>> >>> He's right. Don't have children if you can't afford them. Don't have >>> four children if you can't even afford one. Improve your situation >>> first. This applies equally to men and women. >> >> She probably knows that and could not deny it, so she resorted to name >> calling. > > I don't understand how anyone could disagree. The need for name > calling escapes me even more. Willful ignorance. > |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 12:10:17 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:28:10 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > > >On 2017-04-18 6:20 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: > >>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 22:55:00 -0400, wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:55:53 +1000, Bruce > > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:08:09 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell > >>>>> > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Ah, yes! Old style freon. That would be F-11, F-12 and the rest of the > >>>>>> chlorofluorocarbons. I lost my aerosol chemist career in 1977 because > >>>>>> of government promoted fears that they caused global --cooling--! > >>>>>> It was quite the fright. Time Magazine had it on the cover! Look it up. > >>>>>> Now purely government funded research promotes global warming for us to > >>>>>> froth over. I'm cynical. Ninety eight percent of climatologists agree > >>>>>> with the current hysteria. > >>>>> > >>>>> Hmmm... 98% of scientists versus Leonard Blaisdell. Who to believe? > >>>>> Decisions, decisions. > >>>> > >>>> We have miniscule control over our climate considering climate is > >>>> dependant on solar activity... to date no one has come up with a > >>>> method to control solar activity, which is a good thing or some nut > >>>> would destroy everything. The best we can do is heat our homes on > >>>> cold days and cool our homes on hot days... outdoors we can dress more > >>>> warmly in winter, or find a shady spot in summer. The only climatic > >>>> control we can enforce is the level of polution, and that is totally > >>>> dependant on population... > >>> > >>> There are more ways to control pollution. Even the Chinese have begin > >>> to realise that. Unfortunately you have a president who doesn't. > >> > >> The President has relatively little control over what happens in this > >> country, by design. > >> > >> Place your blame on Americans (like me) who want bigass SUVs, > >> air-conditioning, and beef. (Although I don't actually eat very > >> much beef.) Let's also include the corn industry, who have > >> managed to introduce their products into the food supply at > >> every level. > >> > >I wonder what kind of SUVs that had that caused the the reversal of the > >last Ice Age. About 15,000 years ago the glaciers extended almost to my > >back yard. Just a mile north of me is a kame, a pile of sand and gravel > >that was deposited there by the glacier. > > Probably some nebula in orbit partially shading this planet from the > sun long enough to produce the ice age. I spent 25 years working at a > National Laboratory with many of the world's top scientists, most > don't believe we have control over climate. Most will say events > occur in the universe that control climate. Those pushing the global > warming theory are about as sophisticated in their thinking as those > who not all that long ago believed Earth was the center of the > universe and Earth was flat. There have always been masses who chose > to believe some fercocktah concept to explain that which they don't > know. that's how the concepts of different god(s) and religion(s) > ocurred, and in every part of this planet among peoples who had no > interaction with or knowledge of each other, and of course out of fear > and to control. > https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nebula Nebulas occur between stars, not between a star and its planets. You're full of shit. Cindy Hamilton |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 03:22:13 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 12:10:17 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote: >> Probably some nebula in orbit partially shading this planet from the >> sun long enough to produce the ice age. I spent 25 years working at a >> National Laboratory with many of the world's top scientists, most >> don't believe we have control over climate. Most will say events >> occur in the universe that control climate. Those pushing the global >> warming theory are about as sophisticated in their thinking as those >> who not all that long ago believed Earth was the center of the >> universe and Earth was flat. There have always been masses who chose >> to believe some fercocktah concept to explain that which they don't >> know. that's how the concepts of different god(s) and religion(s) >> ocurred, and in every part of this planet among peoples who had no >> interaction with or knowledge of each other, and of course out of fear >> and to control. >> https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nebula > >Nebulas occur between stars, not between a star and its planets. >You're full of shit. Lol, and that was him sober. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
Janet B. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 10:25:59 -0700 (PDT), "The Greatest!" > > wrote: > > >Sheldon wrote: > > > >> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 03:20:22 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > >> > wrote: > >> > >> >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:29:07 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: > >> >> On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 22:55:00 -0400, wrote: > >> >> > >> >> >On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:55:53 +1000, Bruce > > >> >> >wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >>On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 18:08:09 -0700, Leonard Blaisdell > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > >> >> >>>Ah, yes! Old style freon. That would be F-11, F-12 and the rest of the > >> >> >>>chlorofluorocarbons. I lost my aerosol chemist career in 1977 because > >> >> >>>of government promoted fears that they caused global --cooling--! > >> >> >>>It was quite the fright. Time Magazine had it on the cover! Look it up. > >> >> >>>Now purely government funded research promotes global warming for us to > >> >> >>>froth over. I'm cynical. Ninety eight percent of climatologists agree > >> >> >>>with the current hysteria. > >> >> >> > >> >> >>Hmmm... 98% of scientists versus Leonard Blaisdell. Who to believe? > >> >> >>Decisions, decisions. > >> >> > > >> >> >We have miniscule control over our climate considering climate is > >> >> >dependant on solar activity... to date no one has come up with a > >> >> >method to control solar activity, which is a good thing or some nut > >> >> >would destroy everything. The best we can do is heat our homes on > >> >> >cold days and cool our homes on hot days... outdoors we can dress more > >> >> >warmly in winter, or find a shady spot in summer. The only climatic > >> >> >control we can enforce is the level of polution, and that is totally > >> >> >dependant on population... > >> >> > >> >> There are more ways to control pollution. Even the Chinese have begin > >> >> to realise that. Unfortunately you have a president who doesn't. > >> > > >> >The President has relatively little control over what happens in this > >> >country, by design. > >> > >> Very true. > >> > >> >Place your blame on Americans (like me) who want bigass SUVs, > >> >air-conditioning, and beef. (Although I don't actually eat very > >> >much beef.) Let's also include the corn industry, who have > >> >managed to introduce their products into the food supply at > >> >every level. > >> > > >> >Cindy Hamilton > >> > >> All true, then add over population to the equation. I often see moms > >> shopping with three rug rats in tow and one probably in the oven... > >> paying with food stamps... people are multiplying like rabbits and > >> those least able to afford it places a terrible drain on this planet. > > > > > >Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high. > > > >Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > Don't you also want to use the term "Welfare Queen?" I'd only use the term "Welfare Queen" to describe Steve Sqwertz - he who steals from his local food pantry, thus snatching vittles out of the mouths of poor innocent babes... You're an old > fart Reagan Republican, aren't you? I've no party affiliation, and yes, Reagan was one of our Presidential greats... ;-) -- Best Greg |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
Janet B. wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > > >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:26:05 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote: > snip > >> > >> > >> Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high. > >> > >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > > >Hooray! I beat the odds. It was a tough gig being an unwed > >mother in 1957, and I've always admired mine. > > > >Cindy Hamilton > > I want to reply but I can't think of anything pungent enough to cover > what I think of these hidebound, cement-brained, better-than-thou, > sainted Pharisees. > > Cindy, go girl! I made no reference to Cindy's mon c. 1957, her mother obviously did a good job raising her...that is because from what I see Cindy is a good contributor to this group. I'm no Pharisee, I hold myself no higher than anyone else. But my behavior is better than some, and some's behavior is better than mine... The problem as I see is that whole generations -- primarily as a result of originally well - intentioned Democratic social welfare programs -- have been raised sans any sense of responsibility or obligation, these programs are not "empowering", but they are mightily "enabling". These people (and I am not pointing to any specific group, this behavior is somewhat endemic amongst native - born USAin's) do not aspire "up", they aspire down, to the lowest common denominator, they are so dependent on hand - outs, "programs", and such like that they are crippled, they have never been around normal people doing normal things, like getting up in the morning and going to a job, studying hard in school, setting life goals, and on and on and on... I see penniless immigrants and refugees, newly - arrived from very alien places, but they get out, get working, and do not feel sorry for themselves. They soon gain stability, and their offspring are going to be - or are already - your future doctors, attorneys, engineers, and successful business owners. How many times have we all heard the mantra "The American Dream is DEAD"...NOT true at all, you simply have to go out and work and seize it for yourself. This is not just for foreign - borns, a goodly number of peeps I know wasted their earlier lives on crime, prison, drugs, the whole shebang. In their forties and fifties when they "set the re-set button" on their lives, they are now highly respected and successful... -- Best Greg Much more I could say, there are more pieces to this puzzle, but y'all get my drift... -- Best Greg |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
"The Greatest!" > wrote in message
news:4c0dc29f-7f34-4534-ac94- Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... -- Best Greg ======== I don't believe I've heard Judge Judy use that expression, she usually says people who want to "play house" without the benefit of marriage and then want the courts to divvy up the pots and pans are pretty much out of luck. Cheri |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 7:51:45 AM UTC-10, The Greatest! wrote:
> Janet B. wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > > wrote: > > > > >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:26:05 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote: > > snip > > >> > > >> > > >> Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high. > > >> > > >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > > > > >Hooray! I beat the odds. It was a tough gig being an unwed > > >mother in 1957, and I've always admired mine. > > > > > >Cindy Hamilton > > > > I want to reply but I can't think of anything pungent enough to cover > > what I think of these hidebound, cement-brained, better-than-thou, > > sainted Pharisees. > > > > Cindy, go girl! > > > I made no reference to Cindy's mon c. 1957, her mother obviously did a good job raising her...that is because from what I see Cindy is a good contributor to this group. > > I'm no Pharisee, I hold myself no higher than anyone else. But my behavior is better than some, and some's behavior is better than mine... > > The problem as I see is that whole generations -- primarily as a result of originally well - intentioned Democratic social welfare programs -- have been raised sans any sense of responsibility or obligation, these programs are not "empowering", but they are mightily "enabling". These people (and I am not pointing to any specific group, this behavior is somewhat endemic amongst native - born USAin's) do not aspire "up", they aspire down, to the lowest common denominator, they are so dependent on hand - outs, "programs", and such like that they are crippled, they have never been around normal people doing normal things, like getting up in the morning and going to a job, studying hard in school, setting life goals, and on and on and on... > > I see penniless immigrants and refugees, newly - arrived from very alien places, but they get out, get working, and do not feel sorry for themselves.. They soon gain stability, and their offspring are going to be - or are already - your future doctors, attorneys, engineers, and successful business owners. How many times have we all heard the mantra "The American Dream is DEAD"...NOT true at all, you simply have to go out and work and seize it for yourself. This is not just for foreign - borns, a goodly number of peeps I know wasted their earlier lives on crime, prison, drugs, the whole shebang. In their forties and fifties when they "set the re-set button" on their lives, they are now highly respected and successful... > > > -- > Best > Greg > > Much more I could say, there are more pieces to this puzzle, but y'all get my drift... > > > -- > Best > Greg If you're not a liberal when you're young, you got no heart. If you're not a conservative when you're old, you got no brains. Well, that's what they say anyway. You might be heartened to know the kids these days then to be more conservative. It will be interesting to see how they'll care for this planet they now own. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:58:31 UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "The Greatest!" > wrote in message > news:4c0dc29f-7f34-4534-ac94- > > Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or > both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially > better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" > situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > I don't believe I've heard Judge Judy use that expression, she usually says > people who want to "play house" without the benefit of marriage and then > want the courts to divvy up the pots and pans are pretty much out of luck. Ah, you are correct I believe. It was Dr. Laura - 'memba her!? - who used to use the term "shack - up honey". But Dr. Laura WAS exposed as a "shack - up honey" earlier in life, so thus ended her career... ;-D -- Best Greg |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote: >On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 7:51:45 AM UTC-10, The Greatest! wrote: >> I made no reference to Cindy's mon c. 1957, her mother obviously did a good job raising her...that is because from what I see Cindy is a good contributor to this group. >> >> I'm no Pharisee, I hold myself no higher than anyone else. But my behavior is better than some, and some's behavior is better than mine... >> >> The problem as I see is that whole generations -- primarily as a result of originally well - intentioned Democratic social welfare programs -- have been raised sans any sense of responsibility or obligation, these programs are not "empowering", but they are mightily "enabling". These people (and I am not pointing to any specific group, this behavior is somewhat endemic amongst native - born USAin's) do not aspire "up", they aspire down, to the lowest common denominator, they are so dependent on hand - outs, "programs", and such like that they are crippled, they have never been around normal people doing normal things, like getting up in the morning and going to a job, studying hard in school, setting life goals, and on and on and on... >> >> I see penniless immigrants and refugees, newly - arrived from very alien places, but they get out, get working, and do not feel sorry for themselves. They soon gain stability, and their offspring are going to be - or are already - your future doctors, attorneys, engineers, and successful business owners. How many times have we all heard the mantra "The American Dream is DEAD"...NOT true at all, you simply have to go out and work and seize it for yourself. This is not just for foreign - borns, a goodly number of peeps I know wasted their earlier lives on crime, prison, drugs, the whole shebang. In their forties and fifties when they "set the re-set button" on their lives, they are now highly respected and successful... >> >> Much more I could say, there are more pieces to this puzzle, but y'all get my drift... > >If you're not a liberal when you're young, you got no heart. If you're not a conservative when you're old, you got no brains. Well, that's what they say anyway. > >You might be heartened to know the kids these days then to be more conservative. It will be interesting to see how they'll care for this planet they now own. Conservatives don't care for the planet. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-19 1:27 PM, The Greatest! wrote:
> On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:58:31 UTC-5, Cheri wrote: >> "The Greatest!" > wrote in message >> news:4c0dc29f-7f34-4534-ac94- >> >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or >> both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially >> better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" >> situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >> >> I don't believe I've heard Judge Judy use that expression, she usually says >> people who want to "play house" without the benefit of marriage and then >> want the courts to divvy up the pots and pans are pretty much out of luck. > > > Ah, you are correct I believe. It was Dr. Laura - 'memba her!? - who used to use the term "shack - up honey". But Dr. Laura WAS exposed as a "shack - up honey" earlier in life, so thus ended her career... > She's still spewing forth on XM Satellite radio, AIUI. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-19 2:10 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 7:51:45 AM UTC-10, The Greatest! wrote: > >>> I made no reference to Cindy's mon c. 1957, her mother obviously did a good job raising her...that is because from what I see Cindy is a good contributor to this group. >>> >>> I'm no Pharisee, I hold myself no higher than anyone else. But my behavior is better than some, and some's behavior is better than mine... >>> >>> The problem as I see is that whole generations -- primarily as a result of originally well - intentioned Democratic social welfare programs -- have been raised sans any sense of responsibility or obligation, these programs are not "empowering", but they are mightily "enabling". These people (and I am not pointing to any specific group, this behavior is somewhat endemic amongst native - born USAin's) do not aspire "up", they aspire down, to the lowest common denominator, they are so dependent on hand - outs, "programs", and such like that they are crippled, they have never been around normal people doing normal things, like getting up in the morning and going to a job, studying hard in school, setting life goals, and on and on and on... >>> >>> I see penniless immigrants and refugees, newly - arrived from very alien places, but they get out, get working, and do not feel sorry for themselves. They soon gain stability, and their offspring are going to be - or are already - your future doctors, attorneys, engineers, and successful business owners. How many times have we all heard the mantra "The American Dream is DEAD"...NOT true at all, you simply have to go out and work and seize it for yourself. This is not just for foreign - borns, a goodly number of peeps I know wasted their earlier lives on crime, prison, drugs, the whole shebang. In their forties and fifties when they "set the re-set button" on their lives, they are now highly respected and successful... >>> > >>> Much more I could say, there are more pieces to this puzzle, but y'all get my drift... >> >> If you're not a liberal when you're young, you got no heart. If you're not a conservative when you're old, you got no brains. Well, that's what they say anyway. >> >> You might be heartened to know the kids these days then to be more conservative. It will be interesting to see how they'll care for this planet they now own. > > Conservatives don't care for the planet. > Even though it's in their very name:-( |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:51:45 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote:
> Janet B. wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > > wrote: > > > > >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:26:05 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote: > > snip > > >> > > >> > > >> Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high. > > >> > > >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > > > > >Hooray! I beat the odds. It was a tough gig being an unwed > > >mother in 1957, and I've always admired mine. > > > > > >Cindy Hamilton > > > > I want to reply but I can't think of anything pungent enough to cover > > what I think of these hidebound, cement-brained, better-than-thou, > > sainted Pharisees. > > > > Cindy, go girl! > > > I made no reference to Cindy's mon c. 1957, her mother obviously did a good job raising her...that is because from what I see Cindy is a good contributor to this group. > > I'm no Pharisee, I hold myself no higher than anyone else. But my behavior is better than some, and some's behavior is better than mine... > > The problem as I see is that whole generations -- primarily as a result of originally well - intentioned Democratic social welfare programs -- have been raised sans any sense of responsibility or obligation, these programs are not "empowering", but they are mightily "enabling". These people (and I am not pointing to any specific group, this behavior is somewhat endemic amongst native - born USAin's) do not aspire "up", they aspire down, to the lowest common denominator, they are so dependent on hand - outs, "programs", and such like that they are crippled, they have never been around normal people doing normal things, like getting up in the morning and going to a job, studying hard in school, setting life goals, and on and on and on... You're not wrong. My mother worked all her adult life. She tells me that when I was about two, one morning I begged her not to go to work, to stay home with me. She said, "You work, you come home, you go to sleep, and do it all again the next day." She made it clear that my job was to excel in school (once I was in school) while hers was to keep us fed, clothed, and housed. Cindy Hamilton |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:51:45 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote: > > Janet B. wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > > > wrote: > > > > > > >On Tuesday, April 18, 2017 at 1:26:05 PM UTC-4, The Greatest! wrote: > > > snip > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> Too many young women open their legs for shiftless unemployed young guys, and the result is not very pretty. A huge drain on social services, which we working folk pay for via taxes, and of course the due bills for keeping prisoners in prison are very high. > > > >> > > > >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one or both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an exponentially better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... > > > > > > > >Hooray! I beat the odds. It was a tough gig being an unwed > > > >mother in 1957, and I've always admired mine. > > > > > > > >Cindy Hamilton > > > > > > I want to reply but I can't think of anything pungent enough to cover > > > what I think of these hidebound, cement-brained, better-than-thou, > > > sainted Pharisees. > > > > > > Cindy, go girl! > > > > > > I made no reference to Cindy's mon c. 1957, her mother obviously did a good job raising her...that is because from what I see Cindy is a good contributor to this group. > > > > I'm no Pharisee, I hold myself no higher than anyone else. But my behavior is better than some, and some's behavior is better than mine... > > > > The problem as I see is that whole generations -- primarily as a result of originally well - intentioned Democratic social welfare programs -- have been raised sans any sense of responsibility or obligation, these programs are not "empowering", but they are mightily "enabling". These people (and I am not pointing to any specific group, this behavior is somewhat endemic amongst native - born USAin's) do not aspire "up", they aspire down, to the lowest common denominator, they are so dependent on hand - outs, "programs", and such like that they are crippled, they have never been around normal people doing normal things, like getting up in the morning and going to a job, studying hard in school, setting life goals, and on and on and on... > > You're not wrong. My mother worked all her adult life. She tells > me that when I was about two, one morning I begged her not to go > to work, to stay home with me. She said, "You work, you come home, > you go to sleep, and do it all again the next day." She made it clear > that my job was to excel in school (once I was in school) while hers > was to keep us fed, clothed, and housed. There ya go...most excellent...!!! -- Best Greg |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-19 4:10 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > > wrote: >> You might be heartened to know the kids these days then to be more >> conservative. It will be interesting to see how they'll care for >> this planet they now own. > > Conservatives don't care for the planet. > I would not want to paint them all with the same brush. Some are smart enough to realize that destroying our environment can cost us a lot more on the long run. We had a Conservative government provincially for several decades and during that time we saw a lot of regulations come into effect that cleaned up lakes and rivers and got rid of a lot of air pollution. Meanwhile we have the champagne socialists buying gas guzzling SUVs to head out hundreds of miles into the woods on weekends and patting themselves on the back for respecting nature. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:21:27 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2017-04-19 4:10 PM, Bruce wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >> wrote: > >>> You might be heartened to know the kids these days then to be more >>> conservative. It will be interesting to see how they'll care for >>> this planet they now own. >> >> Conservatives don't care for the planet. >> > >I would not want to paint them all with the same brush. Some are smart >enough to realize that destroying our environment can cost us a lot more >on the long run. We had a Conservative government provincially for >several decades and during that time we saw a lot of regulations come >into effect that cleaned up lakes and rivers and got rid of a lot of air >pollution. Meanwhile we have the champagne socialists buying gas >guzzling SUVs to head out hundreds of miles into the woods on weekends >and patting themselves on the back for respecting nature. I sense a certain biased je ne sais quoi in your post. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-19 5:31 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:21:27 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2017-04-19 4:10 PM, Bruce wrote: >>> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 11:02:55 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > >>> wrote: >> >>>> You might be heartened to know the kids these days then to be more >>>> conservative. It will be interesting to see how they'll care for >>>> this planet they now own. >>> >>> Conservatives don't care for the planet. >>> >> >> I would not want to paint them all with the same brush. Some are smart >> enough to realize that destroying our environment can cost us a lot more >> on the long run. We had a Conservative government provincially for >> several decades and during that time we saw a lot of regulations come >> into effect that cleaned up lakes and rivers and got rid of a lot of air >> pollution. Meanwhile we have the champagne socialists buying gas >> guzzling SUVs to head out hundreds of miles into the woods on weekends >> and patting themselves on the back for respecting nature. > > I sense a certain biased je ne sais quoi in your post. > You don't know? As I pointed out, we had 40 years of Conservatives running our province, and during that time they passed a lot of laws to protect the environment. During that same period about half our federal governments were conservative. Yet, they too enacted environmental protection laws. Meanwhile, we have all those tree hugging hypocrites. Right at the top of the list is Dr. David Suzuki, who spends his time flying around the world to speak out about reducing our carbon footprint, while his is way larger than most of the rest of us. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:43:28 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2017-04-19 5:31 PM, Bruce wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 17:21:27 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2017-04-19 4:10 PM, Bruce wrote: >>>> >>>> Conservatives don't care for the planet. >>>> >>> I would not want to paint them all with the same brush. Some are smart >>> enough to realize that destroying our environment can cost us a lot more >>> on the long run. We had a Conservative government provincially for >>> several decades and during that time we saw a lot of regulations come >>> into effect that cleaned up lakes and rivers and got rid of a lot of air >>> pollution. Meanwhile we have the champagne socialists buying gas >>> guzzling SUVs to head out hundreds of miles into the woods on weekends >>> and patting themselves on the back for respecting nature. >> >> I sense a certain biased je ne sais quoi in your post. >> >You don't know? As I pointed out, we had 40 years of Conservatives >running our province, and during that time they passed a lot of laws to >protect the environment. During that same period about half our federal >governments were conservative. Yet, they too enacted environmental >protection laws. Meanwhile, we have all those tree hugging hypocrites. >Right at the top of the list is Dr. David Suzuki, who spends his time >flying around the world to speak out about reducing our carbon >footprint, while his is way larger than most of the rest of us. Maybe he buys plane tickets with a carbon surcharge that they use to plant trees?  |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
"The Greatest!" > wrote in message
... > On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:58:31 UTC-5, Cheri wrote: >> "The Greatest!" > wrote in message >> news:4c0dc29f-7f34-4534-ac94- >> >> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with one >> or >> both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an >> exponentially >> better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" >> situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >> >> I don't believe I've heard Judge Judy use that expression, she usually >> says >> people who want to "play house" without the benefit of marriage and then >> want the courts to divvy up the pots and pans are pretty much out of >> luck. > > > Ah, you are correct I believe. It was Dr. Laura - 'memba her!? - who used > to use the term "shack - up honey". But Dr. Laura WAS exposed as a > "shack - up honey" earlier in life, so thus ended her career... > > ;-D > > > -- > Best > Greg Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. Cheri |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:01:13 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
> > > Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. > > Cheri I used to listen to her. She gave some pretty solid advice on conducting a conservative, upright, lifestyle. In the end, it was the do as I say and not as I do kind of advice. OTOH, that's mostly the kind of advice most people who have learned from their mistakes in their lives tend to give and it's still solid advice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySga...F9DA7550E38518 |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote: >On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:01:13 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: >> >> >> Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. >> >> Cheri > >I used to listen to her. eir mistakes in their lives tend to give and it's still solid advice. > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySga...F9DA7550E38518 That's not the RFC Laura, the RFC Laura is super HOT, she's gorgeous. It's been many years since she last posted here, I miss her. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
"dsi1" > wrote in message
... On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:01:13 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > > > Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. > > Cheri I used to listen to her. She gave some pretty solid advice on conducting a conservative, upright, lifestyle. In the end, it was the do as I say and not as I do kind of advice. OTOH, that's mostly the kind of advice most people who have learned from their mistakes in their lives tend to give and it's still solid advice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySga...F9DA7550E38518 ======= I've never been big on advice givers when it comes to lifestyle. Cheri |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 4:13:53 PM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 18:06:41 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi1yahoo.com> > wrote: > > >On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:01:13 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > >> > >> > >> Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. > >> > >> Cheri > > > >I used to listen to her. eir mistakes in their lives tend to give and it's still solid advice. > > > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySga...F9DA7550E38518 > > That's not the RFC Laura, the RFC Laura is super HOT, she's gorgeous. > It's been many years since she last posted here, I miss her. I'm betting she split to get away from the RFC horndog. What say you? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 5:21:30 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" <dsi10yahoo.com> wrote in message > ... > On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:01:13 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > > > > > > Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. > > > > Cheri > > I used to listen to her. She gave some pretty solid advice on conducting a > conservative, upright, lifestyle. In the end, it was the do as I say and not > as I do kind of advice. OTOH, that's mostly the kind of advice most people > who have learned from their mistakes in their lives tend to give and it's > still solid advice. > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySga...F9DA7550E38518 > > ======= > > I've never been big on advice givers when it comes to lifestyle. > > Cheri Mostly we listen to advice givers when it jives with our own general view of things. I plead "guilty." |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
On 2017-04-19 5:00 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "The Greatest!" > wrote in message > ... >> On Wednesday, 19 April 2017 12:58:31 UTC-5, Cheri wrote: >>> "The Greatest!" > wrote in message >>> news:4c0dc29f-7f34-4534-ac94- >>> >>> Show me a child who is a product of a MARRIED husband and wife, with >>> one or >>> both parents gainfully employed, and that child will have an >>> exponentially >>> better chance of success in the world. Having a kid in a "shack up" >>> situation (a term I believe Judge Judy uses) should be a crime... >>> >>> I don't believe I've heard Judge Judy use that expression, she >>> usually says >>> people who want to "play house" without the benefit of marriage and then >>> want the courts to divvy up the pots and pans are pretty much out of >>> luck. >> >> >> Ah, you are correct I believe. It was Dr. Laura - 'memba her!? - who >> used to use the term "shack - up honey". But Dr. Laura WAS exposed as >> a "shack - up honey" earlier in life, so thus ended her career... >> >> ;-D >> >> >> -- >> Best >> Greg > > > Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. > > Cheri Years ago, when she first appeared, I used to listen to her while I was working. I heard her give some very good and sensitive advice on occasion. However, she spoiled everything with her religious, right wing viewpoints. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
Spring weather (sigh)
"Cheri" wrote in message news
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 at 1:01:13 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > > > Yes, I do remember Dr. Laura, she always seemed a bit uptight to me. > > Cheri I used to listen to her. She gave some pretty solid advice on conducting a conservative, upright, lifestyle. In the end, it was the do as I say and not as I do kind of advice. OTOH, that's mostly the kind of advice most people who have learned from their mistakes in their lives tend to give and it's still solid advice. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySga...F9DA7550E38518 ======= I've never been big on advice givers when it comes to lifestyle. Cheri ==== Live and let live!! So long as they don't impinge on me and mine .... Best way )-- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| when I sigh | General Cooking | |||
| Premox....sigh | Wine | |||
| Oh God...(sigh)-It Never Ends | General Cooking | |||
| *Sigh* | General Cooking | |||
![Bruce[_28_] is offline](https://www.foodbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
