On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 19:22:58 -0300, lucretia
> wrote:

>On Sun, 02 Jul 2017 06:04:54 +1000, Bruce >
>wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 10:19:10 -0300, lucretia
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 22:22:36 +1000, Bruce >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>You said sending children to sports clubs was very expensive. I said
>>>>that, when I was a child, I didn't need a sports club. I just played
>>>>football on the street. You said my age was showing, because these
>>>>days it's way too dangerous for children to play on the street. They
>>>>always have to be under supervision.
>>>>
>>>>It went something like that.
>>>
>>>I know you cannot produce that post because it goes against everything
>>>I believe. Yes, I would have said sports for kids are very expensive
>>>these days, David introduced soccer for kids here in 1968 when we were
>>>horrified that locally the sports group wanted to raise $3,000 to put
>>>together a baseball team. David said 'send me your kids, I'll bring
>>>a ball and I will send you home tired kids' - they played shirts and
>>>skins and within two years over a thousand kids were playing.
>>>
>>>Sadly I was recently horrified to see how expensive soccer for kids
>>>is, not the original, inclusive idea.
>>
>>I'll see if I can find it later. There are no unique keywords to
>>search for, which makes it hard. I already tried.
>>
>>By the way, it's not that I want to dig up that discussion. I'm just
>>trying to make clear that I wasn't lying.
>
>Knowing very well how I feel, I know I would never have said anything
>of the sort. I am willing to bet if you can find it that it was
>someone else in a thread, just goes completely against everything I
>believe in very strongly on the raising of kids.

I'll try to find it later. I'm not sure if my posts were being
archived back then, but yours probably were.