Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dsi1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:52:22 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: > > "dsi1" wrote in message > > ... > > > > On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:33:14 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: > > > "Bruce" wrote in message > > > ... > > > > > > On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: > > > >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > > > > >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's > > > just >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of > > > beef. Usually >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be > > > prepared sous vide. I'm >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't > > > see any reason to cook something >>> in a plastic bag in a water > > > bath for 48 hours. I'm sure it was >>> tender and tasty. Just > > > not something I'd be interested in when I can >>> cook it and get > > > the same result in just a few hours. <shrug> > > > > > > > > > >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a > > > method of >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in > > > some areas as a cut of >> meat. The idea is it lends well to > > > 'London broil' technique. It's a >> low marble meat that is > > > superb for making dydrated beef in a home unit >> among other > > > things. > > > > > > > > > Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit > > > > means." > > > > > > Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non > > > professional) dehydrator unit. > > > > > > What did I win? > > > > > > == > > > > > > Mine is an Excalibur: > > > > > > http://www.ukjuicers.com/dehydrators...=CP2M4bHX-9QCF > > > Y0V0wodWBoPQQ > > > > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk > > > > That's some serious hardware! ![]() > > > > == > > > > It's a good piece of kit ![]() > > for dealing with excess fruit from the garden. > > > > Oh it makes great yoghurt ![]() > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk > > I used to have one of those plastic, stackable, dehydrators. I guess > it worked okay. Mostly, I made beef jerky. I'm drying some apples. Mucho apples from the trees here! -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Sat 08 Jul 2017 05:02:42p, jmcquown told us... > > > On 7/8/2017 2:41 PM, cshenk wrote: > >> wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > >>> ImStillMags wrote: > >>>> Sheldon wrote: > >>>>> Your word wrap stinks on ice so I'm top posting. > >>>>> I cook London Broil very often, I use top round, and either > >>>>> pan > >>> fry or >> grill... a 1 1/4" thick slab cooks up to a perfet > >>> medium rare in 7-8 >> minutes per side and with no schtinkin' > >>> special equipment.>> Um, London broil is a cooking method, not a > >>> cut... can be chuck, round, sirloin, and others. > > > > > > > >> Sheldon, you've been told multiple times it is sold as the name > >> of a cut in many markets. It DOESNT MATTER that you dont like > >> that. > > > > >> She even says it can be different cuts but it's in the end, a > >> type of meat that speaks to lean. > > > > A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just > > marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually > > involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. > > I'm with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook > > something in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm sure > > it was tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be interested in > > when I can cook it and get the same result in just a few hours. > > <shrug> > > > > Jill > > > > I was told once by a chef that London Broil was a method of cooking, > and that they meat used most often was flank steak. He was correct in that it is a method, not a specific cut. Flank Steak is a possible rename as well but due to that being a higher priced item if named Flank Steak here, (large asian community looking for stir fry), not all that likely locally. The main difference I see locally is the Flank Steak is pre-cut to small thin portions that lead well to stir-fry right away with minimal work on the person from purchase to wok. -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:52:22 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message > ... > > On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:33:14 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: > > "Bruce" wrote in message > > ... > > > > On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > > > wrote: > > > > >On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: > > >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > >> > > >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just > > >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually > > >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. I'm > > >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook something > > >>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm sure it was > > >>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be interested in when I can > > >>> cook it and get the same result in just a few hours. <shrug> > > >>> > > >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of > > >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a cut of > > >> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' technique. It's a > > >> low marble meat that is superb for making dydrated beef in a home unit > > >> among other things. > > >> > > >Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." > > > > Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non > > professional) dehydrator unit. > > > > What did I win? > > > > == > > > > Mine is an Excalibur: > > > > http://www.ukjuicers.com/dehydrators...FY0V0wodWBoPQQ > > > > > > -- > > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk > > That's some serious hardware! ![]() > > == > > It's a good piece of kit ![]() > dealing with excess fruit from the garden. > > Oh it makes great yoghurt ![]() > > > > > > -- > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk We had one over 30 years ago. It was a cheap one with stackable plastic trays. I don't recall what happened with that one. I haven't thought of drying stuff but these days, I'd just use my oven. I enjoyed making yogurt in thermos bottles. That was fun. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"dsi1" wrote in message
... On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 6:45:25 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote: > Wayne Boatwright wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > On Sat 08 Jul 2017 05:02:42p, jmcquown told us... > > > > > On 7/8/2017 2:41 PM, cshenk wrote: > > >> wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > > >>> ImStillMags wrote: > > >>>> Sheldon wrote: > > >>>>> Your word wrap stinks on ice so I'm top posting. > > >>>>> I cook London Broil very often, I use top round, and either > > >>>>> pan > > >>> fry or >> grill... a 1 1/4" thick slab cooks up to a perfet > > >>> medium rare in 7-8 >> minutes per side and with no schtinkin' > > >>> special equipment.>> Um, London broil is a cooking method, not a > > >>> cut... can be chuck, round, sirloin, and others. > > > > > > > > > > >> Sheldon, you've been told multiple times it is sold as the name > > >> of a cut in many markets. It DOESNT MATTER that you dont like > > >> that. > > > > > > >> She even says it can be different cuts but it's in the end, a > > >> type of meat that speaks to lean. > > > > > > A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just > > > marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually > > > involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. > > > I'm with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook > > > something in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm sure > > > it was tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be interested in > > > when I can cook it and get the same result in just a few hours. > > > <shrug> > > > > > > Jill > > > > > > > I was told once by a chef that London Broil was a method of cooking, > > and that they meat used most often was flank steak. > > He was correct in that it is a method, not a specific cut. Flank Steak > is a possible rename as well but due to that being a higher priced item > if named Flank Steak here, (large asian community looking for stir > fry), not all that likely locally. The main difference I see locally > is the Flank Steak is pre-cut to small thin portions that lead well to > stir-fry right away with minimal work on the person from purchase to > wok. > > -- On this rock, a London broil is a thick cut of sirloin. I used to buy those things a lot for stir-fry or just as cooked as a steak. Sometimes it would even be broiled but that always came out poorly. They should have called it a sirloin steak instead of London broil. I don't buy mis-named meats anymore. ![]() == Sirloin is my favourite steak, preferably with a large salad ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 7:45:41 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message > ... > > On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 6:45:25 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote: > > Wayne Boatwright wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > On Sat 08 Jul 2017 05:02:42p, jmcquown told us... > > > > > > > On 7/8/2017 2:41 PM, cshenk wrote: > > > >> wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > > > > > > >>> ImStillMags wrote: > > > >>>> Sheldon wrote: > > > >>>>> Your word wrap stinks on ice so I'm top posting. > > > >>>>> I cook London Broil very often, I use top round, and either > > > >>>>> pan > > > >>> fry or >> grill... a 1 1/4" thick slab cooks up to a perfet > > > >>> medium rare in 7-8 >> minutes per side and with no schtinkin' > > > >>> special equipment.>> Um, London broil is a cooking method, not a > > > >>> cut... can be chuck, round, sirloin, and others. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Sheldon, you've been told multiple times it is sold as the name > > > >> of a cut in many markets. It DOESNT MATTER that you dont like > > > >> that. > > > > > > > > >> She even says it can be different cuts but it's in the end, a > > > >> type of meat that speaks to lean. > > > > > > > > A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just > > > > marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually > > > > involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. > > > > I'm with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook > > > > something in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm sure > > > > it was tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be interested in > > > > when I can cook it and get the same result in just a few hours. > > > > <shrug> > > > > > > > > Jill > > > > > > > > > > I was told once by a chef that London Broil was a method of cooking, > > > and that they meat used most often was flank steak. > > > > He was correct in that it is a method, not a specific cut. Flank Steak > > is a possible rename as well but due to that being a higher priced item > > if named Flank Steak here, (large asian community looking for stir > > fry), not all that likely locally. The main difference I see locally > > is the Flank Steak is pre-cut to small thin portions that lead well to > > stir-fry right away with minimal work on the person from purchase to > > wok. > > > > -- > > On this rock, a London broil is a thick cut of sirloin. I used to buy those > things a lot for stir-fry or just as cooked as a steak. Sometimes it would > even be broiled but that always came out poorly. They should have called it > a sirloin steak instead of London broil. I don't buy mis-named meats > anymore. ![]() > > == > > Sirloin is my favourite steak, preferably with a large salad ![]() > > -- > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk My guess is that a London broil is not called "London" nor is it broiled in London. Over there, it's just called a steak. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
.44... On Sun 09 Jul 2017 10:45:32a, Ophelia told us... > "dsi1" wrote in message > ... > > On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 6:45:25 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote: >> Wayne Boatwright wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >> > On Sat 08 Jul 2017 05:02:42p, jmcquown told us... >> > >> > > On 7/8/2017 2:41 PM, cshenk wrote: >> > >> wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > > > >> > >>> ImStillMags wrote: >> > >>>> Sheldon wrote: >> > >>>>> Your word wrap stinks on ice so I'm top posting. >> > >>>>> I cook London Broil very often, I use top round, and >> > >>>>> either pan >> > >>> fry or >> grill... a 1 1/4" thick slab cooks up to a perfet >> > >>> medium rare in 7-8 >> minutes per side and with no >> > >>> schtinkin' special equipment.>> Um, London broil is a >> > >>> cooking method, not a cut... can be chuck, round, sirloin, >> > >>> and others. >> > > > >> > > > >> > >> Sheldon, you've been told multiple times it is sold as the >> > >> name of a cut in many markets. It DOESNT MATTER that you >> > >> dont like that. >> > > > >> > >> She even says it can be different cuts but it's in the end, >> > >> a type of meat that speaks to lean. >> > > >> > > A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's >> > > just marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of >> > > beef. Usually involves marinade. It does not have to be >> > > prepared sous vide. I'm with Sheldon on this one. I can't >> > > see any reason to cook something in a plastic bag in a water >> > > bath for 48 hours. I'm sure it was tender and tasty. Just >> > > not something I'd be interested in when I can cook it and get >> > > the same result in just a few hours. <shrug> >> > > >> > > Jill >> > > >> > >> > I was told once by a chef that London Broil was a method of >> > cooking, and that they meat used most often was flank steak. >> >> He was correct in that it is a method, not a specific cut. Flank >> Steak is a possible rename as well but due to that being a higher >> priced item if named Flank Steak here, (large asian community >> looking for stir fry), not all that likely locally. The main >> difference I see locally is the Flank Steak is pre-cut to small >> thin portions that lead well to stir-fry right away with minimal >> work on the person from purchase to wok. >> >> -- > > On this rock, a London broil is a thick cut of sirloin. I used to > buy those things a lot for stir-fry or just as cooked as a steak. > Sometimes it would even be broiled but that always came out > poorly. They should have called it a sirloin steak instead of > London broil. I don't buy mis-named meats anymore. ![]() > > == > > Sirloin is my favourite steak, preferably with a large salad ![]() > My dad used to buy sirloin steak to cook on the grill. I always thought they were tough. After I was living on my own I bought sirloin steaks a few times, even using a marinade a couple of times. I still thought they were tough. For many years now I have always bought either bone-in or boneless ribeye steaks. They cut like butter and are very tender to eat. The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. Wayne Boatwright == Odd. I season mine and let it rest, then I fry it very quickly on each side and it is always tender! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
> My dad used to buy sirloin steak to cook on the grill. I always > thought they were tough. After I was living on my own I bought > sirloin steaks a few times, even using a marinade a couple of times. > I still thought they were tough. For many years now I have always > bought either bone-in or boneless ribeye steaks. They cut like > butter and are very tender to eat. > > The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. I'e never been a huge fan of sirloin either, my favorites are ribeye and chuck eye steaks. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 14:05:43 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message news ![]() >On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 13:12:31 +0100, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >>"Ophelia" wrote in message ... >> >>"dsi1" wrote in message ... >> >>On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:52:22 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >>> "dsi1" wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>> On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:33:14 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >>> > Mine is an Excalibur: >>> > >>> > http://www.ukjuicers.com/dehydrators...FY0V0wodWBoPQQ >>> > >>> That's some serious hardware! ![]() >>> >>> == >>> >>> It's a good piece of kit ![]() >>> dealing with excess fruit from the garden. >>> >>> Oh it makes great yoghurt ![]() >>> >>I used to have one of those plastic, stackable, dehydrators. I guess it >>worked okay. Mostly, I made beef jerky. >> >>== >> >>I have the 4 drawer unit black unit you can see on that site. I can get a >>lot into that. >> >>As for jerky, I don't like it but D does ![]() >>I have a glut. >> >>--- >> >>Ooops that should be 5 drawer ... ![]() > >Do you leave it on overnight? I always hate the idea that's stuff is >on when we're off. > >== > >Not usually, but I've never had a problem if I have forgotten it and it has >run all night. And if I start early enough, I have 16 hours. Should be enough. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 10:45:45 -0500, Terry Coombs >
wrote: >On 7/9/2017 7:27 AM, Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 07:16:07 -0500, Terry Coombs > >> wrote: >> >>> On 7/9/2017 2:52 AM, Bruce wrote: >>>> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 08:32:42 +0100, "Ophelia" > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Bruce" wrote in message ... >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >>>>>>> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >>>>>>>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >>>>>>>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. I'm >>>>>>>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook something >>>>>>>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm sure it was >>>>>>>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be interested in when I can >>>>>>>> cook it and get the same result in just a few hours. <shrug> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >>>>>>> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a cut of >>>>>>> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' technique. It's a >>>>>>> low marble meat that is superb for making dydrated beef in a home unit >>>>>>> among other things. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >>>>> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >>>>> professional) dehydrator unit. >>>>> >>>>> What did I win? >>>>> >>>>> == >>>>> >>>>> Mine is an Excalibur: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ukjuicers.com/dehydrators...FY0V0wodWBoPQQ >>>> Yes, we have that one too. It's not good for what we bought it for, >>>> and we haven't found a use for dehydrating yet. But I'm sure I'll find >>>> something. Didn't you suggest dehydrating banana? >>> We have one (Nesco brand , heat and fan) , and I've used it to make >>> deer jerky , dried tomatoes (sliced 1/4" thick) , basil from the garden >>> , and celery from the grocery store . I use celery in several dishes , >>> but we can't use it all before it gets yucky so I dry part of it . Just >>> about any fruit that's firm enough to slice can be dehydrated . Some , >>> like apples , bananas , and apricots are good straight out of the bag , >>> some are best used in a recipe . >> We bought ours to make tempeh, which needs to be between 30C and 32C >> IIRC, but the temperature isn't precise enough. It has no thermostat. >> >> I'll try some fruits and vegetables. I wonder if frying and then >> drying chopped onion would work. > > Won't know unless you try ... but I'm guessing yeah , it should work >. I'd slice the onions rather than chop/dice . Maybe we need to start a >new thread about dehydrators . I'll do that. Try the onions I mean. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 11:30:10 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >> > On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >> >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > > >> >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >> >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >> >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. >> I'm >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook >> something >>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm >> sure it was >>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be >> interested in when I can >>> cook it and get the same result in just >> a few hours. <shrug> >> > > > >> >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >> >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a >> cut of >> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' >> technique. It's a >> low marble meat that is superb for making >> dydrated beef in a home unit >> among other things. >> > > >> > Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >> >> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >> professional) dehydrator unit. >> >> What did I win? > >Snicker, a recipe for doing it if you wish? Yay, but I'll try onions and fruit. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cheri" wrote in message news
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message > My dad used to buy sirloin steak to cook on the grill. I always > thought they were tough. After I was living on my own I bought > sirloin steaks a few times, even using a marinade a couple of times. > I still thought they were tough. For many years now I have always > bought either bone-in or boneless ribeye steaks. They cut like > butter and are very tender to eat. > > The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. I'e never been a huge fan of sirloin either, my favorites are ribeye and chuck eye steaks. Cheri === I do like ribeye but I will take a sirloin first. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am Sonntag, 9. Juli 2017 21:59:53 UTC+2 schrieb Ophelia:
> "Cheri" wrote in message news ![]() > "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message > > > My dad used to buy sirloin steak to cook on the grill. I always > > thought they were tough. After I was living on my own I bought > > sirloin steaks a few times, even using a marinade a couple of times. > > I still thought they were tough. For many years now I have always > > bought either bone-in or boneless ribeye steaks. They cut like > > butter and are very tender to eat. > > > > The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. > > I'e never been a huge fan of sirloin either, my favorites are ribeye and > chuck eye steaks. > > Cheri > > === > > I do like ribeye but I will take a sirloin first. Skirt steak, anyone? (Medium) rare. Bye, Sanne. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message news
![]() On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 14:05:43 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message >news ![]() >On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 13:12:31 +0100, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >>"Ophelia" wrote in message ... >> >>"dsi1" wrote in message ... >> >>On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 10:52:22 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >>> "dsi1" wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>> On Saturday, July 8, 2017 at 9:33:14 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >>> > Mine is an Excalibur: >>> > >>> > http://www.ukjuicers.com/dehydrators...FY0V0wodWBoPQQ >>> > >>> That's some serious hardware! ![]() >>> >>> == >>> >>> It's a good piece of kit ![]() >>> dealing with excess fruit from the garden. >>> >>> Oh it makes great yoghurt ![]() >>> >>I used to have one of those plastic, stackable, dehydrators. I guess it >>worked okay. Mostly, I made beef jerky. >> >>== >> >>I have the 4 drawer unit black unit you can see on that site. I can get a >>lot into that. >> >>As for jerky, I don't like it but D does ![]() >>when >>I have a glut. >> >>--- >> >>Ooops that should be 5 drawer ... ![]() > >Do you leave it on overnight? I always hate the idea that's stuff is >on when we're off. > >== > >Not usually, but I've never had a problem if I have forgotten it and it has >run all night. And if I start early enough, I have 16 hours. Should be enough. ==== If it isn't and you don't want to leave it running, turn it off and back on again when you come back. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 10:45:45 -0500, Terry Coombs > wrote: >On 7/9/2017 7:27 AM, Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 07:16:07 -0500, Terry Coombs > >> wrote: >> >>> On 7/9/2017 2:52 AM, Bruce wrote: >>>> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 08:32:42 +0100, "Ophelia" > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Bruce" wrote in message >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >>>>>>> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >>>>>>>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >>>>>>>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. I'm >>>>>>>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook something >>>>>>>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm sure it was >>>>>>>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be interested in when I >>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>> cook it and get the same result in just a few hours. <shrug> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >>>>>>> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a cut >>>>>>> of >>>>>>> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' technique. It's a >>>>>>> low marble meat that is superb for making dydrated beef in a home >>>>>>> unit >>>>>>> among other things. >>>>>>> >>>>>> Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >>>>> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >>>>> professional) dehydrator unit. >>>>> >>>>> What did I win? >>>>> >>>>> == >>>>> >>>>> Mine is an Excalibur: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.ukjuicers.com/dehydrators...FY0V0wodWBoPQQ >>>> Yes, we have that one too. It's not good for what we bought it for, >>>> and we haven't found a use for dehydrating yet. But I'm sure I'll find >>>> something. Didn't you suggest dehydrating banana? >>> We have one (Nesco brand , heat and fan) , and I've used it to make >>> deer jerky , dried tomatoes (sliced 1/4" thick) , basil from the garden >>> , and celery from the grocery store . I use celery in several dishes , >>> but we can't use it all before it gets yucky so I dry part of it . Just >>> about any fruit that's firm enough to slice can be dehydrated . Some , >>> like apples , bananas , and apricots are good straight out of the bag , >>> some are best used in a recipe . >> We bought ours to make tempeh, which needs to be between 30C and 32C >> IIRC, but the temperature isn't precise enough. It has no thermostat. >> >> I'll try some fruits and vegetables. I wonder if frying and then >> drying chopped onion would work. > > Won't know unless you try ... but I'm guessing yeah , it should work >. I'd slice the onions rather than chop/dice . Maybe we need to start a >new thread about dehydrators . I'll do that. Try the onions I mean. == I dehy both ... fried onion and sliced raw. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 11:30:10 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >> > On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >> >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > > >> >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >> >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >> >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. >> I'm >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook >> something >>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm >> sure it was >>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be >> interested in when I can >>> cook it and get the same result in just >> a few hours. <shrug> >> > > > >> >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >> >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a >> cut of >> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' >> technique. It's a >> low marble meat that is superb for making >> dydrated beef in a home unit >> among other things. >> > > >> > Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >> >> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >> professional) dehydrator unit. >> >> What did I win? > >Snicker, a recipe for doing it if you wish? Yay, but I'll try onions and fruit. == Apple rings are very good ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:07:59 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message ... > >>> We bought ours to make tempeh, which needs to be between 30C and 32C >>> IIRC, but the temperature isn't precise enough. It has no thermostat. >>> >>> I'll try some fruits and vegetables. I wonder if frying and then >>> drying chopped onion would work. >> >>Won't know unless you try ... but I'm guessing yeah , it should work. >>I'd slice the onions rather than chop/dice . Maybe we need to start a >>new thread about dehydrators . > >I'll do that. Try the onions I mean. > >== > >I dehy both ... fried onion and sliced raw. Do the fried onions end up crispy? I'd hope to achieve something like this: <https://www.orientalwebshop.nl/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/x700/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/3/9/39939.jpg> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:07:02 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message news ![]() >On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 14:05:43 +0100, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >>"Bruce" wrote in message >>news ![]() >>On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 13:12:31 +0100, "Ophelia" > >>wrote: >> >>>I have the 4 drawer unit black unit you can see on that site. I can get a >>>lot into that. >>> >>>As for jerky, I don't like it but D does ![]() >>>when >>>I have a glut. >>> >>>--- >>> >>>Ooops that should be 5 drawer ... ![]() >> >>Do you leave it on overnight? I always hate the idea that's stuff is >>on when we're off. >> >>== >> >>Not usually, but I've never had a problem if I have forgotten it and it has >>run all night. > >And if I start early enough, I have 16 hours. Should be enough. > >==== > >If it isn't and you don't want to leave it running, turn it off and back on >again when you come back. Yes, I guess the interruption doesn't cause a problem. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:08:52 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message ... > >On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 11:30:10 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >>> >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> > > >>> >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >>> >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >>> >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. >>> I'm >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook >>> something >>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm >>> sure it was >>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be >>> interested in when I can >>> cook it and get the same result in just >>> a few hours. <shrug> >>> > > > >>> >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >>> >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a >>> cut of >> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' >>> technique. It's a >> low marble meat that is superb for making >>> dydrated beef in a home unit >> among other things. >>> > > >>> > Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >>> >>> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >>> professional) dehydrator unit. >>> >>> What did I win? >> >>Snicker, a recipe for doing it if you wish? > >Yay, but I'll try onions and fruit. > >== > >Apple rings are very good ![]() Apple rings, banana and fried onions. I'm going to do it this time. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:07:59 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message .. . > >>> We bought ours to make tempeh, which needs to be between 30C and 32C >>> IIRC, but the temperature isn't precise enough. It has no thermostat. >>> >>> I'll try some fruits and vegetables. I wonder if frying and then >>> drying chopped onion would work. >> >>Won't know unless you try ... but I'm guessing yeah , it should work. >>I'd slice the onions rather than chop/dice . Maybe we need to start a >>new thread about dehydrators . > >I'll do that. Try the onions I mean. > >== > >I dehy both ... fried onion and sliced raw. Do the fried onions end up crispy? I'd hope to achieve something like this: <https://www.orientalwebshop.nl/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/x700/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/3/9/39939.jpg> == Well, yes but it depends how long you leave them to dehy ![]() Crispy ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:07:02 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message >news ![]() >On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 14:05:43 +0100, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >>"Bruce" wrote in message >>news ![]() >>On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 13:12:31 +0100, "Ophelia" > >>wrote: >> >>>I have the 4 drawer unit black unit you can see on that site. I can get >>>a >>>lot into that. >>> >>>As for jerky, I don't like it but D does ![]() >>>when >>>I have a glut. >>> >>>--- >>> >>>Ooops that should be 5 drawer ... ![]() >> >>Do you leave it on overnight? I always hate the idea that's stuff is >>on when we're off. >> >>== >> >>Not usually, but I've never had a problem if I have forgotten it and it >>has >>run all night. > >And if I start early enough, I have 16 hours. Should be enough. > >==== > >If it isn't and you don't want to leave it running, turn it off and back on >again when you come back. Yes, I guess the interruption doesn't cause a problem. ==== All I can say is, I didn't have any problems with mine. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message ...
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:08:52 +0100, "Ophelia" > wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message .. . > >On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 11:30:10 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >>> wrote: >>> >>> > On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >>> >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> > > >>> >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >>> >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >>> >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. >>> I'm >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook >>> something >>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm >>> sure it was >>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be >>> interested in when I can >>> cook it and get the same result in just >>> a few hours. <shrug> >>> > > > >>> >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >>> >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a >>> cut of >> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' >>> technique. It's a >> low marble meat that is superb for making >>> dydrated beef in a home unit >> among other things. >>> > > >>> > Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >>> >>> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >>> professional) dehydrator unit. >>> >>> What did I win? >> >>Snicker, a recipe for doing it if you wish? > >Yay, but I'll try onions and fruit. > >== > >Apple rings are very good ![]() Apple rings, banana and fried onions. I'm going to do it this time. == Report back? ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 22:01:56 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote: >"Bruce" wrote in message ... > >On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:08:52 +0100, "Ophelia" > >wrote: > >>"Bruce" wrote in message . .. >> >>On Sun, 09 Jul 2017 11:30:10 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >>>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> >>>> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017 21:26:38 -0400, jmcquown > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > On 7/8/2017 8:31 PM, cshenk wrote: >>>> >> jmcquown wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>> > > >>>> >>> A butcher may call a cut of beef "london broil" but that's just >>>> >>> marketing. It's a method of preparing lean cuts of beef. Usually >>>> >>> involves marinade. It does not have to be prepared sous vide. >>>> I'm >>> with Sheldon on this one. I can't see any reason to cook >>>> something >>> in a plastic bag in a water bath for 48 hours. I'm >>>> sure it was >>> tender and tasty. Just not something I'd be >>>> interested in when I can >>> cook it and get the same result in just >>>> a few hours. <shrug> >>>> > > > >>>> >> Hi Jill, I do understand in pure form 'London Broil' is a method of >>>> >> cooking, but the fact remains, it is marketed in some areas as a >>>> cut of >> meat. The idea is it lends well to 'London broil' >>>> technique. It's a >> low marble meat that is superb for making >>>> dydrated beef in a home unit >> among other things. >>>> > > >>>> > Oh dear. I wish I knew what "drydrated beef in a home unit means." >>>> >>>> Let me help: it's beef that has been dehydrated in a home (ie non >>>> professional) dehydrator unit. >>>> >>>> What did I win? >>> >>>Snicker, a recipe for doing it if you wish? >> >>Yay, but I'll try onions and fruit. >> >>== >> >>Apple rings are very good ![]() > >Apple rings, banana and fried onions. I'm going to do it this time. > >== > >Report back? ![]() I will ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Sun, 9 Jul 2017 21:07:59 +0100, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > > > "Bruce" wrote in message > > ... > > > >>> We bought ours to make tempeh, which needs to be between 30C and > 32C >>> IIRC, but the temperature isn't precise enough. It has no > thermostat. > > > > > >>> I'll try some fruits and vegetables. I wonder if frying and then > >>> drying chopped onion would work. > > > > > > Won't know unless you try ... but I'm guessing yeah , it should > > > work. I'd slice the onions rather than chop/dice . Maybe we need > > > to start a new thread about dehydrators . > > > > I'll do that. Try the onions I mean. > > > > == > > > > I dehy both ... fried onion and sliced raw. > > Do the fried onions end up crispy? I'd hope to achieve something like > this: > <https://www.orientalwebshop.nl/media...che/1/image/x7 > 00/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/3/9/39939.jpg> I havent tried that but I bet they would! -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message
9.45... > The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. > > > Wayne Boatwright > > == > > Odd. I season mine and let it rest, then I fry it very quickly on > each side and it is always tender! > Then your sirloin is not our sirloin. :-) Wayne Boatwright ==== That seems to be true of a lot of things ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 9:26:21 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message > 9.45... > > > The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. > > > > > > Wayne Boatwright > > > > == > > > > Odd. I season mine and let it rest, then I fry it very quickly on > > each side and it is always tender! > > > > Then your sirloin is not our sirloin. :-) > > > Wayne Boatwright > ==== > > That seems to be true of a lot of things ![]() > > -- > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk Near as I can tell, the cut in question is called a New York steak in the US. Oddly enough, I had one of those for lunch. I'm getting awfully good at cooking steaks. I fried up some onions and a can of corn too. The onions were fried at high temperature because I wanted to char them. The canned corn was fried in ghee. My goal was to remove the excess moisture in the corn. They turned out quite chewy. That was a wonderful can of corn! https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...YKP5uuafnfZ9k6 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"dsi1" wrote in message
... On Sunday, July 9, 2017 at 9:26:21 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: > "Wayne Boatwright" wrote in message > 9.45... > > > The only way I used sirloin now is if I grind or mince it. > > > > > > Wayne Boatwright > > > > == > > > > Odd. I season mine and let it rest, then I fry it very quickly on > > each side and it is always tender! > > > > Then your sirloin is not our sirloin. :-) > > > Wayne Boatwright > ==== > > That seems to be true of a lot of things ![]() > > -- > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk Near as I can tell, the cut in question is called a New York steak in the US. Oddly enough, I had one of those for lunch. I'm getting awfully good at cooking steaks. I fried up some onions and a can of corn too. The onions were fried at high temperature because I wanted to char them. The canned corn was fried in ghee. My goal was to remove the excess moisture in the corn. They turned out quite chewy. That was a wonderful can of corn! https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...YKP5uuafnfZ9k6 == That sounds like a jolly yummie dinner ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sous Vide Circulators (Was: Sous- Vid(e) cooking) | General Cooking | |||
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide) | General Cooking | |||
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide) | General Cooking | |||
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker for Sous Vide) | General Cooking | |||
My Sous Vide Experiences. (WAS: Hacking your slow cooker forSous Vide) | General Cooking |