On 2017-07-19 3:21 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> If you think you're fooling ANYBODY on RFC with your silly fake
> personas, you are very sadly mistakn. You're nothing if not a joke and
> no one thinks you are in the last bit funny. Personally, I think
> you're sad, pitiful, and childish, especially if you have nothing else
> to do with your time.
>
> And please be assured that none of this siliness bothers me in the
> least. When I happen to come across it, nothing makes me laugh more,
> thinking what an effing idiot you are.

I have said it before and will say it again. Sometimes people screw up
and change names and attitudes. To be constantly nymshifting to get
around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
to yourself that you are a complete loser.

>

On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-07-19 3:21 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>> If you think you're fooling ANYBODY on RFC with your silly fake
>> personas, you are very sadly mistakn. You're nothing if not a joke and
>> no one thinks you are in the last bit funny. Personally, I think
>> you're sad, pitiful, and childish, especially if you have nothing else
>> to do with your time.
>>
>> And please be assured that none of this siliness bothers me in the
>> least. When I happen to come across it, nothing makes me laugh more,
>> thinking what an effing idiot you are.
>
> I have said it before and will say it again. Sometimes people screw up
> and change names and attitudes. To be constantly nymshifting to get
> around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
> to yourself that you are a complete loser.

Wrong, Dave.
Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
you.

On 7/19/2017 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2017-07-19 3:21 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
>>> If you think you're fooling ANYBODY on RFC with your silly fake
>>> personas, you are very sadly mistakn. You're nothing if not a joke and
>>> no one thinks you are in the last bit funny. Personally, I think
>>> you're sad, pitiful, and childish, especially if you have nothing else
>>> to do with your time.
>>>
>>> And please be assured that none of this siliness bothers me in the
>>> least. When I happen to come across it, nothing makes me laugh more,
>>> thinking what an effing idiot you are.
>>
>> I have said it before and will say it again. Sometimes people screw up
>> and change names and attitudes. To be constantly nymshifting to get
>> around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
>> to yourself that you are a complete loser.
>
> Wrong, Dave.
> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
> you.
>
>
>
>
I was hoping for a group hug today. Looks like it may not happen.

On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:

>> I have said it before and will say it again. Sometimes people screw up
>> and change names and attitudes. To be constantly nymshifting to get
>> around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
>> to yourself that you are a complete loser.
>
> Wrong, Dave.
> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
> you.


Wow. Talk about going off an a strange tangent.

On 2017-07-19 3:21 AM, Wayne peter eater Boatwright wrote:> If you think
you're fooling ANYBODY on RFC with your silly fake> personas, you are
very sadly mistakn. You're nothing if not a joke and> no one thinks you
are in the last bit funny. Personally, I think> you're sad, pitiful,
and childish, especially if you have nothing else> to do with your
time.>> And please be assured that none of this siliness bothers me in
the> least. When I happen to come across it, nothing makes me laugh
more,> thinking what an effing idiot you are.>

Hit him with your purse, you flaming sissy!

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...


> I was hoping for a group hug today. Looks like it may not happen.


((((((((((((((((((((((((hug))))))))))))))))))))))) )))

Cheri

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...


> I was hoping for a group hug today. Looks like it may not happen.


((((((((((((((((((((((((hug))))))))))))))))))))))) )))

Cheri

==

Yayyyyyyyyy

((((((((((((((((((((((((hug))))))))))))))))))))))) )))

)


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 7/19/2017 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> > On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > > On 2017-07-19 3:21 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > > > If you think you're fooling ANYBODY on RFC with your silly fake
> > > > personas, you are very sadly mistakn. You're nothing if not a
> > > > joke and no one thinks you are in the last bit funny.
> > > > Personally, I think you're sad, pitiful, and childish,
> > > > especially if you have nothing else to do with your time.
> > > >
> > > > And please be assured that none of this siliness bothers me in
> > > > the least. When I happen to come across it, nothing makes me
> > > > laugh more, thinking what an effing idiot you are.
> > >
> > > I have said it before and will say it again. Sometimes people
> > > screw up and change names and attitudes. To be constantly
> > > nymshifting to get around filters is throwing in the towel and
> > > admitting to the world and to yourself that you are a complete
> > > loser.
> >
> > Wrong, Dave.
> > Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get
> > rid of you.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I was hoping for a group hug today. Looks like it may not happen.

Sorry Ed! Huggs!

--

On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>
> Wrong, Dave.
> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
> you.
>

Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.
>

On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:47:19 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>
>> Wrong, Dave.
>> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
>> you.
>>
>
>Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
>able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
>to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
>included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
>so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
>likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.

Flaunting your money. Only North-Americans.

On 7/19/2017 9:13 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:47:19 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>> Wrong, Dave.
>>> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
>>> you.
>>>
>>
>> Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
>> able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
>> to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
>> included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
>> so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
>> likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.
>
> Flaunting your money. Only North-Americans.
>

To be fair, I threw Dave a cheapshot so I fully expected him to fire
back at me.

I had to look up what he said that made me say that to him.

------------------------------------------------------------------
> To be constantly nymshifting to get
> around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
> to yourself that you are a complete loser.

Wrong, Dave.
Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
you.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

So that was it. He was calling others losers.
I have no problem with Dave but I'll call him on some things that he says.

He can't hurt me with his, "I have more toys than you" comments. We both
took different career directions and I'm fine with my decisions. I
raised my daughter for 13 years by myself with no child support. I made
business decisions to make that work well for her sake. It worked and I
don't regret what I did even though I did sacrifice a nicer career.

We (Dave and me) are both happy now so evidently I don't need as many
toys as Dave does. :-D

On 2017-07-19 9:13 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:47:19 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>
>>> Wrong, Dave.
>>> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
>>> you.
>>>
>>
>> Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
>> able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
>> to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
>> included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
>> so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
>> likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.
>
> Flaunting your money. Only North-Americans.
>
Oh? He had suggested that my employer dumped me. I had a good job and
retired at 53 with a decent pension.

On 2017-07-20 7:07 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 7/19/2017 9:13 PM, Bruce wrote:

> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To be constantly nymshifting to get
> > around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
> > to yourself that you are a complete loser.
>
> Wrong, Dave.
> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
> you.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> So that was it. He was calling others losers.
> I have no problem with Dave but I'll call him on some things that he says.


You should try reading that again. I said that when people are
constantly name shifting to get past filters they are admitting to
themselves and to the world that they are losers. They know that they
are in a lot of filters so they have to come up with new names to try to
slip past them. The constant changes are the sign that they know they
are being ignored.

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:38:14 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:

> On 2017-07-20 7:07 AM, Gary wrote:
>> On 7/19/2017 9:13 PM, Bruce wrote:
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To be constantly nymshifting to get
>> > around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the world and
>> > to yourself that you are a complete loser.
>>
>> Wrong, Dave.
>> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
>> you.
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> So that was it. He was calling others losers.
>> I have no problem with Dave but I'll call him on some things that he says.
>
> You should try reading that again. I said that when people are
> constantly name shifting to get past filters they are admitting to
> themselves and to the world that they are losers. They know that they
> are in a lot of filters so they have to come up with new names to try to
> slip past them. The constant changes are the sign that they know they
> are being ignored.

Perhaps these people with me in their killfile shouldn't be talking
about and PINGing those people, then. That says you want to dish it
out, but you're too much of a pussy chicken-shit to deal with the
reactions. You're the expert at this, Davey. Whine has taken that
lesson from you. You two are so much alike in your hypocrisy and
overly-verbose worthlessness here.

ObFood: I really like the Safeway/Randalls bagels. Jalapeno
cheddar for me. Great texture and perfect chew. Better than anything
from New Yawk.

-sw

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 14:53:35 GMT, Wayne Boatwright
> wrote:

>On Thu 20 Jul 2017 07:38:14a, Dave Smith told us...
>
>> On 2017-07-20 7:07 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> On 7/19/2017 9:13 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > To be constantly nymshifting to get
>>> > around filters is throwing in the towel and admitting to the
>>> > world and to yourself that you are a complete loser.
>>>
>>> Wrong, Dave.
>>> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get
>>> rid of you.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>>
>>> So that was it. He was calling others losers.
>>> I have no problem with Dave but I'll call him on some things that
>>> he says.
>>
>>
>> You should try reading that again. I said that when people are
>> constantly name shifting to get past filters they are admitting to
>> themselves and to the world that they are losers. They know that
>> they are in a lot of filters so they have to come up with new
>> names to try to slip past them. The constant changes are the sign
>> that they know they are being ignored.
>>
>>
>>
>
>Well said, Dave, and AFAIC, accurate.

I couldn't agree more, Wayne. You said that very well. Thank you for
your post! A wonderful contribution to rfc. Did I thank you yet? If
not, thanks!

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:31:26 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-07-19 9:13 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:47:19 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> Wrong, Dave.
>>>> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
>>> able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
>>> to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
>>> included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
>>> so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
>>> likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.
>>
>> Flaunting your money. Only North-Americans.
>>
>Oh? He had suggested that my employer dumped me. I had a good job and
>retired at 53 with a decent pension.

You got have just said that.

On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:13:41 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:47:19 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
> >On 2017-07-19 9:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> >> On 7/19/2017 8:57 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> >>>
> >> Wrong, Dave.
> >> Seems to me that they offered you an early retirement just to get rid of
> >> you.
> >>
> >
> >Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
> >able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
> >to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
> >included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
> >so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
> >likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.
>
> Flaunting your money. Only North-Americans.

At least WE have some money to flaunt whereas you poor scrapple-land
owners are still scratching to feed your families.
I received over 1100 times from the sale of my land over what I paid for it.
I'm happy.

On Thu, 20 Jul 2017 17:36:45 -0700 (PDT), Roy >
wrote:

>On Wednesday, July 19, 2017 at 7:13:41 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 20:47:19 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Says he man who is marginally employed long past the age where I was
>> >able to retire with a full pension. The government I worked for wanted
>> >to reduce the size of the public service, so they worked out a deal that
>> >included dropping our retirement qualification from a 90 factor to 80,
>> >so I was able to retire at the age of 53, and with a pension that is
>> >likely more than you could dream of earning on a record year.
>>
>> Flaunting your money. Only North-Americans.
>
>At least WE have some money to flaunt whereas you poor scrapple-land
>owners are still scratching to feed your families.
>I received over 1100 times from the sale of my land over what I paid for it.
>I'm happy.

Flaunting your money is extremely plebby, you nouveau riche!