Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:02:25 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2017-08-23 9:11 AM, Gary wrote: >> >> If all those ingredients make the good fries, I have no problem >> with it. I don't eat them often but when I do I totally enjoy >> them. > >I have never understood the attraction to McDonald's fries. There are >edible, but real potatoes make better fries. Even frozen fries are >better than McDonalds fries. > >> I also often make home french fries with potato, oil, s&p. Those >> are good too but I'm not selling them commercially and worrying >> about customers suing me for bad fries. > >Why would they do that? McDonalds has been selling bad fries for years, >but they have an advertising budget that helps to convince people they >are good. Yes, the only thing special about them is the ingredient list and probably their cheapness. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 09:12:49 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Bruce wrote: >> >> All those chains use this kind of chicken: >> >> <http://images0.tcdn.nl/feed/article21882861.ece/BINARY/original/plofkip> > >Nonsense. That's militant vegetarians promoting that. >I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971 and for those 2 months, >my main job was to cut up the chickens every few days into >9 parts. > >Whole chickens arrived at the store every 2-3 days >and I'm the one that cut them up. These were fresh >killed chickens, all the same size and whole. >They were perfect chicken bodies, not some >birth-defect chickens that you believe. > >I can understand you not eating meat in order to >save the animals but don't spread myths like that. 2017 - 1971... let me see that's 46 years ago. Have you seen footage of chicken factories in the past 10 years or so? I saw English chef Hugh Fearnley go into one. He came out crying. And that was the UK. The US has lower standards, if any. Have you seen the footage of the American turkey factory workers who were kicking live turkeys around like footballs? People are awful. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? > Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' is a new variety type of potato. ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 18:54:30 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> >> Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? >> >Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' is a new >variety type of potato. ![]() Could be that special type from Mount Arat. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 11:02 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 07:42:17a, Cheri told us... > >> "jmcquown" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >>> On 8/22/2017 10:03 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >>>>> On 2017-08-22 9:35 AM, Gary wrote: >>>>>> My daughter and I rode with my parents one day to check on >>>>>> their new house that was being built. It was about 300 miles >>>>>> away. Well, about half way, Dad stopped at a McDonalds for >>>>>> bathroom and a quick lunch. >>>>>> >>> >>> Eating and driving is about stupid as [these days] as talking or >>> texting on a cell phone while driving. >>> >>>>>> So in this one McDonalds, I ordered 3 quarter pounders with >>>>>> cheese and 2 large fries. I figured I would eat one burger and >>>>>> fries at the table then take the rest to munch on as we >>>>>> continued to travel. >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh man. What I didn't know is that my Dad was an assmunch and >>>>>> refused to have food in his nifty new car. No munching burgers >>> >>> That's not an excuse for ordering three burgers. >>> >>>>>> along the way. He refused to leave the McDonalds until I ate >>>>>> all that food. Crap! Since he was treating, I felt the need to >>>>>> eat it all and not toss some. >>>>>> >>>>>> So we all sat there until I ate 3 quarter pounders and 2 large >>>>>> fries. He was worried about food in his car? He should have >>>>>> been more worried that I might throw-up all that crammed in >>>>>> food into his super-duper new car. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't blame him. I would not want people eating in my new car >>>>> either. >>>> >>> I have *never* eaten in my car, new or otherwise. >>> >>>> But you can pull over and get out to eat. >>> >>> Yep, there are rest-stops all along major highways, even 25 years >>> ago. You can find places to pull off the road even if you take >>> secondary highways. >>> >>> Jill >> >> >> I agree, don't want people eating in the car. >> >> Cheri >> >> > > I also don't want anyone drinking beverages in the car unless the > container is tightly lidded. > Tightly lidded, of course. I figure the only reason to be drinking while driving (and I am of course NOT referring to alcohol) is if you're on a long trip. Going to the grocery store? I'm sure you can hold out. Some people seem to *have* to have a bottle or a cup of liquid in the car every time they leave the house. You'd think the car wouldn't start if you didn't put something in that cup holder. LOL Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> On 8/22/2017 12:16 PM, Cheri wrote: >> "Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message >> 9.45... >>> On Tue 22 Aug 2017 06:46:59a, Dave Smith told us... >>> >>>> On 2017-08-22 9:35 AM, Gary wrote: >>>>> S Viemeister wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On 8/22/2017 12:57 PM, Bruce wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> College towns are nice that way. I wouldn't want to live in a >>>>>>> place where McDonalds is the most interesting option. >>>>>>> >>>>>> My nearest McDonald's is about 100 miles south. >>>>> >>>>> Here's a somewhat funny that happened to me about 25 years ago. >>>>> >>>>> My daughter and I rode with my parents one day to check on their >>>>> new house that was being built. It was about 300 miles away. >>>>> Well, about half way, Dad stopped at a McDonalds for bathroom and >>>>> a quick lunch. >>>>> >>>>> Whenever I traveled, I would always buy several burgers (or BBQ >>>>> sandwiches) so I could eat some on the way. >>>>> >>>>> So in this one McDonalds, I ordered 3 quarter pounders with >>>>> cheese and 2 large fries. I figured I would eat one burger and >>>>> fries at the table then take the rest to munch on as we continued >>>>> to travel. >>>>> >>>>> Oh man. What I didn't know is that my Dad was an assmunch and >>>>> refused to have food in his nifty new car. No munching burgers >>>>> along the way. He refused to leave the McDonalds until I ate all >>>>> that food. Crap! Since he was treating, I felt the need to eat it >>>>> all and not toss some. >>>>> >>>>> So we all sat there until I ate 3 quarter pounders and 2 large >>>>> fries. He was worried about food in his car? He should have been >>>>> more worried that I might throw-up all that crammed in food into >>>>> his super-duper new car. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I don't blame him. I would not want people eating in my new car >>>> either. >>>> >>> >>> We don't allow eating food or smoking in our car, even though we both >>> smoke. >> >> Same here when I smoked, no smoking in house either, always on the patio >> which could get cold, but *thems the breaks.* >> >> Cheri > > Except in the 1980's, I always had to go outside to smoke at work. > > In my car, I'm the only person in it so I'll smoke if I want to. But I > have never eaten in my car. > > Jill I eat in my car a few times a week. I keep a pack of Sargento shredded sharp cheddar in the center console to add to my tacos. I keep extra taco souce (sic) in there, too! --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 7:27 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 03:54:30p, jmcquown told us... > >> On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> >>> Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? >>> >> Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' is a >> new variety type of potato. ![]() >> >> Jill >> > > Oh, you haven't found that variety in your store? :-) > > I don't think it's the keyboard. I have significant neuropathy in my > fingers, and unfortunately my news reader doesn't have spellcheck. > Spell-check is mostly a joke anyway. Any time I use it on RFC it keeps trying to change Ed's last name to something. Your name came out Cartright. Own the Ponderosa, do you? ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 7:31 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> I also don't want anyone drinking beverages in the car unless the >> container is tightly lidded. >> > Tightly lidded, of course.* I figure the only reason to be drinking > while driving (and I am of course NOT referring to alcohol) is if you're > on a long trip.* Going to the grocery store?* I'm sure you can hold out. > > Some people seem to *have* to have a bottle or a cup of liquid in the > car every time they leave the house.* You'd think the car wouldn't start > if you didn't put something in that cup holder. LOL > > Jill I have an insulated stainless steel bottle that I take if we are going more than an hour. I used to take it to work for the ride home. I should have just taken a drink of water before leaving but mostly did not and on the way home I'd relax from the day and get thirsty. The water was still ice cold and very welcome. Even in the heat of the summer, that bottle can sit in the car all day and still have ice 9 or 10 hours later. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-08-23 9:43 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 8/23/2017 7:31 PM, jmcquown wrote: > I have an insulated stainless steel bottle that I take if we are going > more than an hour.* I used to take it to work for the ride home.* I > should have just taken a drink of water before leaving but mostly did > not and on the way home I'd relax from the day and get thirsty.* The > water was still ice cold and very welcome.* Even in the heat of the > summer, that bottle can sit in the car all day and still have ice 9 or > 10 hours later. In a couple months I will be able to stick a bottle of frozen water in my car and it will sty frozen until March or April. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:54:40 -0700, "Cheri" > > wrote: > > >"Bruce" > wrote in message > > ... > >> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:32:53 -0600, Casa de Masa > wrote: > > > > > > > On 8/22/2017 5:18 PM, Cheri wrote: > >>>> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message > >>>> news ![]() > > > > > > >>>>>> So enjoy your "burger" and your "fries" and > >>>>>> have a nice day. > > > > > > > >>>>> I will and I always do! > > > > > > > > > > > >>>> And don't need anybody's permission to do so. ![]() > > > > > > >>>> Cheri > > > > > > > > Indeed! > > > > >> I suggest that you 2 now do a little dance together. Or a > singalong, >> your choice. > > > > > > Don't need your permission for that either and you should MYOB as > > far as others eating habits go. Take care of your own business and > > you'll have plenty to do. > > Don't play the victim. I'm not telling you what to eat. At most, I'm > telling you what you're eating. But you don't care about that anyway. > As long as you can wrap your mouth around it. Seriously, what is your problem? -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> Bruce wrote: > > > > All those chains use this kind of chicken: > > > > <http://images0.tcdn.nl/feed/article2...Y/original/plo > > fkip> > > Nonsense. That's militant vegetarians promoting that. > I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971 and for those 2 months, > my main job was to cut up the chickens every few days into > 9 parts. > > Whole chickens arrived at the store every 2-3 days > and I'm the one that cut them up. These were fresh > killed chickens, all the same size and whole. > They were perfect chicken bodies, not some > birth-defect chickens that you believe. > > I can understand you not eating meat in order to > save the animals but don't spread myths like that. Dont worry, we all know he makes that crap up -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 10:03:52 +1000, Bruce >
wrote: >On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 18:52:34 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >>Ok, lets try this again now that you list primary Europe and AUS >>background. >> >>Yes, you came off as snooty. Nothing USA was good enough > >I didn't say anything about the USA. I said there were cultural >differences. That I think McDonalds sell crap is another subject. That >doesn't reflect on the USA. You can buy crap in any country. > >> and you felt a need to say is was a lack of options (it isnt, Dunkin Donuts can be >>just as inexpensive, just not as many of them). Denny's works too and >>is more popular where I am but not all that many have them. IHOP also >>works. Plenty of small local spots of similar but what is the worth of >>mentioning Momma's Kitchen here? (thats a local place) > >Cindy said there are "dried up towns" where McDonalds is the only >option for an affordable cup of coffee. I'm sure she's right and it >may also exist in Australia, but I didn't bring that up. > >>If you wish to belive all things Europe/AUS are better and that USA >>things are a poor substitute, you will. > >I really don't know where you get all this nonsense. I don't think >Europe/AUS are better than the USA. You can't compare countries like >that. What's good here, is not so good there and vice versa. I also >don't compare the Netherlands and Australia, for that same reason. > >>It seemed to totally escape you that a simple place with 1$ coffee and >>free refills (multiple places, not just McDees) works for some. > >In the US, it works for more people and for more kinds of people than >in Europe. That's my theory, based on what y'all tell me and my own >experience. > >Don't turn this into a patriotic ****ing contest. It's not. When I say something perfectly to cshenk, like the above, she never replies. She's not interested in "reasonable". She's only looking for a fight. And that, cshenkie, makes YOU the troll. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:16:41 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:54:40 -0700, "Cheri" > >> wrote: >> >> >"Bruce" > wrote in message >> > ... >> >> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:32:53 -0600, Casa de Masa > wrote: >> > > >> > > > On 8/22/2017 5:18 PM, Cheri wrote: >> >>>> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message >> >>>> news ![]() >> > > > > >> >>>>>> So enjoy your "burger" and your "fries" and >> >>>>>> have a nice day. >> > > > > > >> >>>>> I will and I always do! >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >>>> And don't need anybody's permission to do so. ![]() >> > > > > >> >>>> Cheri >> > > > >> > > > Indeed! >> > > >> >> I suggest that you 2 now do a little dance together. Or a >> singalong, >> your choice. >> > >> > >> > Don't need your permission for that either and you should MYOB as >> > far as others eating habits go. Take care of your own business and >> > you'll have plenty to do. >> >> Don't play the victim. I'm not telling you what to eat. At most, I'm >> telling you what you're eating. But you don't care about that anyway. >> As long as you can wrap your mouth around it. > >Seriously, what is your problem? Stop trolling, please. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:19:22 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> Bruce wrote: >> > >> > All those chains use this kind of chicken: >> > >> > <http://images0.tcdn.nl/feed/article2...Y/original/plo >> > fkip> >> >> Nonsense. That's militant vegetarians promoting that. >> I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971 and for those 2 months, >> my main job was to cut up the chickens every few days into >> 9 parts. >> >> Whole chickens arrived at the store every 2-3 days >> and I'm the one that cut them up. These were fresh >> killed chickens, all the same size and whole. >> They were perfect chicken bodies, not some >> birth-defect chickens that you believe. >> >> I can understand you not eating meat in order to >> save the animals but don't spread myths like that. > >Dont worry, we all know he makes that crap up Stop trolling, please. It looks bad on you, Cshenkie. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, August 23, 2017 at 3:11:33 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote: > > > > All those chains use this kind of chicken: > > > > <http://images0.tcdn.nl/feed/article21882861.ece/BINARY/original/plofkip> > > Nonsense. That's militant vegetarians promoting that. > I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971 and for those 2 months, > my main job was to cut up the chickens every few days into > 9 parts. > > Whole chickens arrived at the store every 2-3 days > and I'm the one that cut them up. These were fresh > killed chickens, all the same size and whole. > They were perfect chicken bodies, not some > birth-defect chickens that you believe. > > I can understand you not eating meat in order to > save the animals but don't spread myths like that. Back then, the backbone was not served with the chicken. The whole breasts were the largest pieces. That was chicken heaven. God knows what they did with all those backbones. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 8:53 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 04:31:04p, jmcquown told us... > >> On 8/23/2017 11:02 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 07:42:17a, Cheri told us... >>> >>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message >>>> news ![]() >>>>>>> On 2017-08-22 9:35 AM, Gary wrote: >>>>>>>> My daughter and I rode with my parents one day to check on >>>>>>>> their new house that was being built. It was about 300 miles >>>>>>>> away. Well, about half way, Dad stopped at a McDonalds for >>>>>>>> bathroom and a quick lunch. >>>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Eating and driving is about stupid as [these days] as talking >>>>> or texting on a cell phone while driving. >>>>> >>>>>>>> So in this one McDonalds, I ordered 3 quarter pounders with >>>>>>>> cheese and 2 large fries. I figured I would eat one burger >>>>>>>> and fries at the table then take the rest to munch on as we >>>>>>>> continued to travel. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oh man. What I didn't know is that my Dad was an assmunch >>>>>>>> and refused to have food in his nifty new car. No munching >>>>>>>> burgers >>>>> >>>>> That's not an excuse for ordering three burgers. >>>>> >>>>>>>> along the way. He refused to leave the McDonalds until I ate >>>>>>>> all that food. Crap! Since he was treating, I felt the need >>>>>>>> to eat it all and not toss some. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> So we all sat there until I ate 3 quarter pounders and 2 >>>>>>>> large fries. He was worried about food in his car? He >>>>>>>> should have been more worried that I might throw-up all that >>>>>>>> crammed in food into his super-duper new car. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I don't blame him. I would not want people eating in my new >>>>>>> car either. >>>>>> >>>>> I have *never* eaten in my car, new or otherwise. >>>>> >>>>>> But you can pull over and get out to eat. >>>>> >>>>> Yep, there are rest-stops all along major highways, even 25 >>>>> years ago. You can find places to pull off the road even if you >>>>> take secondary highways. >>>>> >>>>> Jill >>>> >>>> >>>> I agree, don't want people eating in the car. >>>> >>>> Cheri >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I also don't want anyone drinking beverages in the car unless the >>> container is tightly lidded. >>> >> Tightly lidded, of course. I figure the only reason to be >> drinking while driving (and I am of course NOT referring to >> alcohol) is if you're on a long trip. Going to the grocery store? >> I'm sure you can hold out. >> >> Some people seem to *have* to have a bottle or a cup of liquid in >> the car every time they leave the house. You'd think the car >> wouldn't start if you didn't put something in that cup holder. LOL >> >> Jill >> > > During the hot months in Phoenix you absolutely must have liquid with > you. When you get into a parked car and it's 110 degrees or more > outside, the car will likely be 120-130 degrees and direct sun, and > even with a/c it takes a few minutes to cool off. > I wasn't referring to a car sitting in a hot parking lot in Arizona. More like a pattern of behavior. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 8:59 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 04:55:35p, jmcquown told us... > >> On 8/23/2017 7:27 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 03:54:30p, jmcquown told us... >>> >>>> On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? >>>>> >>>> Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' is >>>> a new variety type of potato. ![]() >>>> >>>> Jill >>>> >>> >>> Oh, you haven't found that variety in your store? :-) >>> >>> I don't think it's the keyboard. I have significant neuropathy >>> in my fingers, and unfortunately my news reader doesn't have >>> spellcheck. >>> >> Spell-check is mostly a joke anyway. Any time I use it on RFC it >> keeps trying to change Ed's last name to something. Your name >> came out Cartright. Own the Ponderosa, do you? ![]() >> >> Jill >> > > LOL Other spellcheckers I've used had a feature to add a new word or > name and its dictionary would remember it, bypassing it the next time > it was encountered. > Sure, you can add a word or create your own spelling. It's just goofy it wants to change your surname to Cartright. It wants Ed's last name to be "Malinowski" or "paleolithic". This is why I say they're pretty much useless. It's not my job to keep them updated or create a dictionary. Regardless, everyone makes typos. It's really no big deal. ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 01:01:10 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 8/23/2017 8:59 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 04:55:35p, jmcquown told us... >> >>> On 8/23/2017 7:27 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 03:54:30p, jmcquown told us... >>>> >>>>> On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? >>>>>> >>>>> Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' is >>>>> a new variety type of potato. ![]() >>>>> >>>>> Jill >>>>> >>>> >>>> Oh, you haven't found that variety in your store? :-) >>>> >>>> I don't think it's the keyboard. I have significant neuropathy >>>> in my fingers, and unfortunately my news reader doesn't have >>>> spellcheck. >>>> >>> Spell-check is mostly a joke anyway. Any time I use it on RFC it >>> keeps trying to change Ed's last name to something. Your name >>> came out Cartright. Own the Ponderosa, do you? ![]() >>> >>> Jill >>> >> >> LOL Other spellcheckers I've used had a feature to add a new word or >> name and its dictionary would remember it, bypassing it the next time >> it was encountered. >> >Sure, you can add a word or create your own spelling. It's just goofy >it wants to change your surname to Cartright. It wants Ed's last name >to be "Malinowski" or "paleolithic". > >This is why I say they're pretty much useless. It's not my job to keep >them updated or create a dictionary. It's only a matter of adding Add instead of Ignore. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Wayne Boatwright" > wrote in message
9.44... > On Wed 23 Aug 2017 10:01:10p, jmcquown told us... > >> On 8/23/2017 8:59 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 04:55:35p, jmcquown told us... >>> >>>> On 8/23/2017 7:27 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 03:54:30p, jmcquown told us... >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' >>>>>> is a new variety type of potato. ![]() >>>>>> >>>>>> Jill >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Oh, you haven't found that variety in your store? :-) >>>>> >>>>> I don't think it's the keyboard. I have significant neuropathy >>>>> in my fingers, and unfortunately my news reader doesn't have >>>>> spellcheck. >>>>> >>>> Spell-check is mostly a joke anyway. Any time I use it on RFC >>>> it keeps trying to change Ed's last name to something. Your >>>> name came out Cartright. Own the Ponderosa, do you? ![]() >>>> >>>> Jill >>>> >>> >>> LOL Other spellcheckers I've used had a feature to add a new >>> word or name and its dictionary would remember it, bypassing it >>> the next time it was encountered. >>> >> Sure, you can add a word or create your own spelling. It's just >> goofy it wants to change your surname to Cartright. It wants Ed's >> last name to be "Malinowski" or "paleolithic". >> >> This is why I say they're pretty much useless. It's not my job to >> keep them updated or create a dictionary. Regardless, everyone >> makes typos. >> It's really no big deal. ![]() >> >> Jill >> > > I know I do make more than average. I don't care about mistakes, spelling, typos or any of that, as long as I can read it, I'm good. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 19:55:35 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: >On 8/23/2017 7:27 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> On Wed 23 Aug 2017 03:54:30p, jmcquown told us... >> >>> On 8/23/2017 11:47 AM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>> >>>> Are you saying that they are aratificial potatoes? >>>> >>> Methinks you need a new keyboard, Wayne, unless 'arataficial' is a >>> new variety type of potato. ![]() >>> >>> Jill >>> >> >> Oh, you haven't found that variety in your store? :-) >> >> I don't think it's the keyboard. I have significant neuropathy in my >> fingers, and unfortunately my news reader doesn't have spellcheck. >> >Spell-check is mostly a joke anyway. Any time I use it on RFC it keeps >trying to change Ed's last name to something. Your name came out >Cartright. Own the Ponderosa, do you? ![]() > >Jill The spell checker within Agent is excellent - can be set to English UK or English US so it depends what you use. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 24 Aug 2017 12:40:19 +1000, Bruce >
wrote: >On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:16:41 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:54:40 -0700, "Cheri" > >>> wrote: >>> >>> >"Bruce" > wrote in message >>> > ... >>> >> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:32:53 -0600, Casa de Masa > wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > On 8/22/2017 5:18 PM, Cheri wrote: >>> >>>> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message >>> >>>> news ![]() >>> > > > > >>> >>>>>> So enjoy your "burger" and your "fries" and >>> >>>>>> have a nice day. >>> > > > > > >>> >>>>> I will and I always do! >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> >>>> And don't need anybody's permission to do so. ![]() >>> > > > > >>> >>>> Cheri >>> > > > >>> > > > Indeed! >>> > > >>> >> I suggest that you 2 now do a little dance together. Or a >>> singalong, >> your choice. >>> > >>> > >>> > Don't need your permission for that either and you should MYOB as >>> > far as others eating habits go. Take care of your own business and >>> > you'll have plenty to do. >>> >>> Don't play the victim. I'm not telling you what to eat. At most, I'm >>> telling you what you're eating. But you don't care about that anyway. >>> As long as you can wrap your mouth around it. >> >>Seriously, what is your problem? > >Stop trolling, please. You better watch out Bruce - next she will claim you want her as your 'net nanny' -- whatever that is! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/24/2017 1:01 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> Spell-check is mostly a joke anyway.* Any time I use it on RFC it >>> keeps trying to change Ed's last name to something.* Your name >>> came out Cartright.* Own the Ponderosa, do you? ![]() >>> >>> Jill >>> >> >> LOL* Other spellcheckers I've used had a feature to add a new word or >> name and its dictionary would remember it, bypassing it the next time >> it was encountered. >> > Sure, you can add a word or create your own spelling.* It's just goofy > it wants to change your surname to Cartright.* It wants Ed's last name > to be "Malinowski" or "paleolithic". The grandkids would think paleolithic would be about right. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/24/2017 1:42 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>> >>>> LOL* Other spellcheckers I've used had a feature to add a new >>>> word or name and its dictionary would remember it, bypassing it >>>> the next time it was encountered. >>>> >>> Sure, you can add a word or create your own spelling.* It's just >>> goofy it wants to change your surname to Cartright.* It wants Ed's >>> last name to be "Malinowski" or "paleolithic". >>> >>> This is why I say they're pretty much useless.* It's not my job to >>> keep them updated or create a dictionary.* Regardless, everyone >>> makes typos. >>> * It's really no big deal. ![]() >>> >>> Jill >>> >> >> I know I do make more than average. > > I don't care about mistakes, spelling, typos or any of that, as long as > I can read it, I'm good. > > Cheri Most times I go back and re-read before sending, but not always. Like you, I can read the sentence and it is not a concern. Once in a while a good typo is the best part of the thread. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> > In my car, I'm the only person in it so I'll smoke if I want to. But I > have never eaten in my car. And you think that smoking in your car is better than eating in your car? Do explain. Personally, if I own the car (and it's not a lease), I do any damn thing I want to in the car. Others can just back off with the criticism. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dsi1 wrote:
> > Back then, the backbone was not served with the chicken. > The whole breasts were the largest pieces. That was > chicken heaven. God knows what they did with all > those backbones. ![]() Not true in my store, Dsi1. Remember, I cut up all the perfect fresh chickens that summer. I liked that part of my job. Backbones were sliced right down the middle and you got 1/2 backbone with each breast piece. Here's how I cut them using a cool spinning razor sharp round blade: - fold the two wings then cut them off - cut the chicken in half between breast and thigh area - cut the "keel" off of the tip of chicken breast - cut the chicken breast in half, right down the middle of the backbone. - cut between thighs and drums 9 pieces and 2 chickens (18 pieces) to a bag. When we cooked chicken in 6 large pressure cookers with lard, that cooked one bag (18 pieces) in each pressure cooker. Back then, KFC was NOT a full restaurant that served other things besides chicken. My store sold "original chicken" only. This was before they came out with extra crispy and whatever else they added later. So.... Various meals of the original only. We also added mashed potatoes with gravy. And coleslaw. No dumb biscuits back then. Back then your meal came with 2 soft dinner rolls. Only other thing sold there were tiny single serving desserts and a few whole dessert pies to take home. We also delivered but not from someones personal car. The store had their own KFC VW bug painted red with the KFC logo and pic of Col.Sanders on both sides. The passenger seat was removed to hold the insulated hot box for deliveries. I did most of the deliveries too. Mostly to the Newport naval base. Some on ships so I got to walk up the gangplank and deliver onboard ships. Others to the barracks there. As someone else said, this was long ago and probably not the same now. I know they don't use pressure cookers now. Now it's some new-fangled pressure frier thing. Probably not lard either. One last thing. The good perk of the job was that when you were working your shift, you were allowed to eat all the chicken that your wanted. At first I thought I had died and gone to KFC heaven. Funny though...after eating all I wanted to for a week or so, I got so sick of that chicken taste that most of my time, I never again ate any "free" chicken. hehaha I never even went back to KFC for several years after I had left. Good chicken but "too much of a good thing" is very true. :-D |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> > This is why I say they're pretty much useless. It's not my job to keep > them updated or create a dictionary. Regardless, everyone makes typos. > It's really no big deal. ![]() I rarely use my spellchecker but when I do and it catches a word... If that's something you use often, just press "learn" instead of "ignore". You should try that. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
> > It's only a matter of adding Add instead of Ignore. Exactly! Mine says "learn" but it's the same as your "Add" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> > Situations often dictate behavior. When we lived in Ohio I would > hever have thought to take a drink in the car, but I knew people who > did. They wouldn't leave for work without a mug of coffee in the car > or a cold drink on the way home. Unless you are leasing a car and planning to return it, I suspect most people will eat, drink, smoke in their cars. I've never worried about it. As I said, when long distant traveling, I'll stop and buy extra food so I can munch along the boring way. I'm not a slob though that might spill food out of my mouth onto the seat cover or the floor. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheri wrote:
> > "Wayne Boatwright" wrote: > > I know I do make more than average. > > I don't care about mistakes, spelling, typos or any of that, as long as I > can read it, I'm good. Same here. It's all easy enough to figure out. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 8:57:20 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: > > > > In my car, I'm the only person in it so I'll smoke if I want to. But I > > have never eaten in my car. > > And you think that smoking in your car is better than eating in > your car? Do explain. > > Personally, if I own the car (and it's not a lease), I do any > damn thing I want to in the car. Others can just back off with > the criticism. Didn't this start with your criticism of your father? Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Cheri wrote: >> >> "Wayne Boatwright" wrote: >> > I know I do make more than average. >> >> I don't care about mistakes, spelling, typos or any of that, as long as I >> can read it, I'm good. > > Same here. It's all easy enough to figure out. ![]() Yes, it is. I do notice as I've gotten older that sometimes words like *their* and *there* get mixed up occasionally as well. ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 9:02:14 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
> Wayne Boatwright wrote: > > > > Situations often dictate behavior. When we lived in Ohio I would > > hever have thought to take a drink in the car, but I knew people who > > did. They wouldn't leave for work without a mug of coffee in the car > > or a cold drink on the way home. > > Unless you are leasing a car and planning to return it, I suspect > most people will eat, drink, smoke in their cars. I've never > worried about it. As I said, when long distant traveling, I'll > stop and buy extra food so I can munch along the boring way. I'm > not a slob though that might spill food out of my mouth onto the > seat cover or the floor. Your car, your rules. We stop and eat at a table in a restaurant when traveling, although we sometimes have a snack (potato chips or similar) while driving. We would not consider extra burgers to be a snack, but you eat a lot more than we do. I'm pretty sure my husband occasionally eats fast food in his car, but I don't eat in my car. I probably would be ok with my husband eating lunch in my car, but I never would drive while eating anything substantial; it's too much of a distraction. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-08-24 9:20 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Thursday, August 24, 2017 at 9:02:14 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote: >> Wayne Boatwright wrote: > I probably would be ok with my husband eating lunch in my car, > but I never would drive while eating anything substantial; it's > too much of a distraction. I was never in the habit of eating while driving. I made an exception one night. I was really hungry after an evening paddle and I stopped and picked up some tacos. It was a twenty plus minute drive home and I figured they would get cold and soggy so I should eat them on the way home. On my second or third bite the thing flopped open and the hot contents spilled out onto my shirt, pants and the car seat. I hope I learned my lesson from that one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 7:12 AM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote: >> >> All those chains use this kind of chicken: >> >> <http://images0.tcdn.nl/feed/article21882861.ece/BINARY/original/plofkip> > > Nonsense. That's militant vegetarians promoting that. > I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971 and for those 2 months, > my main job was to cut up the chickens every few days into > 9 parts. > > Whole chickens arrived at the store every 2-3 days > and I'm the one that cut them up. These were fresh > killed chickens, all the same size and whole. > They were perfect chicken bodies, not some > birth-defect chickens that you believe. > > I can understand you not eating meat in order to > save the animals but don't spread myths like that. > That's what common or garden variety trolls do! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 8:02 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> McDonalds has been selling bad fries for years, but they have an > advertising budget that helps to convince people they are good. > You're an utter MORON to believe such gobbige! Their fries are widely known as the BEST in fast food, period! And they RARELY ever advertise them, you dolt! https://www.thestreet.com/story/1321...nch-fries.html #1 Name: McDonald's French Fries Signature Ingredient/Featu Cooked in a canola oil blend Calories: 500 Total Fat: 25g Cholesterol: 0mg Sodium: 355mg http://www.businessinsider.com/the-b...america-2015-7 In celebration of National French Fry Day on Monday, we're bringing you the definitive ranking of the top fries in America. According to a survey from the research firm YouGov, McDonald's serves the best french fries in the nation, followed by Burger King and Five Guys. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 1:57 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> Why would they do that? McDonalds has been selling bad fries for years, >> but they have an advertising budget that helps to convince people they >> are good. > Yes, the only thing special about them is the ingredient list and > probably their cheapness. Dead WRONG, troller. https://www.thestreet.com/story/1321...nch-fries.html #1 Name: McDonald's French Fries Signature Ingredient/Featu Cooked in a canola oil blend Calories: 500 Total Fat: 25g Cholesterol: 0mg Sodium: 355mg http://www.businessinsider.com/the-b...america-2015-7 In celebration of National French Fry Day on Monday, we're bringing you the definitive ranking of the top fries in America. According to a survey from the research firm YouGov, McDonald's serves the best french fries in the nation, followed by Burger King and Five Guys. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 1:54 PM, Bruce wrote:
> They're just experts at fooling your tastebuds. Ever use a cough drop? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 8:40 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:16:41 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:54:40 -0700, "Cheri" > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> "Bruce" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 17:32:53 -0600, Casa de Masa > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 8/22/2017 5:18 PM, Cheri wrote: >>>>>>> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message >>>>>>> news ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So enjoy your "burger" and your "fries" and >>>>>>>>> have a nice day. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will and I always do! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> And don't need anybody's permission to do so. ![]() >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Cheri >>>>>> >>>>>> Indeed! >>>>> >>>>> I suggest that you 2 now do a little dance together. Or a >>> singalong, >> your choice. >>>> >>>> >>>> Don't need your permission for that either and you should MYOB as >>>> far as others eating habits go. Take care of your own business and >>>> you'll have plenty to do. >>> >>> Don't play the victim. I'm not telling you what to eat. At most, I'm >>> telling you what you're eating. But you don't care about that anyway. >>> As long as you can wrap your mouth around it. >> >> Seriously, what is your problem? > > Stop trolling, please. > Pot/kettle/Bruce. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/23/2017 8:41 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2017 21:19:22 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >> Gary wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> Bruce wrote: >>>> >>>> All those chains use this kind of chicken: >>>> >>>> <http://images0.tcdn.nl/feed/article2...Y/original/plo >>>> fkip> >>> >>> Nonsense. That's militant vegetarians promoting that. >>> I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971 and for those 2 months, >>> my main job was to cut up the chickens every few days into >>> 9 parts. >>> >>> Whole chickens arrived at the store every 2-3 days >>> and I'm the one that cut them up. These were fresh >>> killed chickens, all the same size and whole. >>> They were perfect chicken bodies, not some >>> birth-defect chickens that you believe. >>> >>> I can understand you not eating meat in order to >>> save the animals but don't spread myths like that. >> >> Dont worry, we all know he makes that crap up > > Stop trolling, please. It looks bad on you, Cshenkie. > Pot/kettle/Bruce. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Fun Vintage Item | General Cooking | |||
Wish Me Luck | General Cooking | |||
Pot Luck | General Cooking | |||
Wish me luck | Barbecue | |||
Pot Luck Help | General Cooking |