On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:42:06 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>>many
>>>>>times.
>>>>
>>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>>
>>>
>>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>>different
>>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>>and
>>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>>
>> Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
>> habit of offending people.
>>
>> Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
>> be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>
>
>Something you could be proud of is posting a recipe to Ophelia's request for
>cookies or something like that, instead of just chiming in with snarky
>remarks about peoples religion, country, eating habits, husbands, wives,
>etc. in every post. You don't get to regulate behavior, so give it up. BTW,
>you called ME a bitch a couple of years ago, but at least it wasn't the *C*
>word. LOL

Years ago. That's how far you had to go back. Besides, you have a
passive aggressive unpleasant side to you, so it was a diagnosis, not
name calling.

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:42:06 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them.
>>>>>>I'm
>>>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>>>many
>>>>>>times.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also,
>>>>you
>>>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>>>different
>>>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>>>and
>>>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>>>
>>> Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
>>> habit of offending people.
>>>
>>> Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
>>> be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>>
>>
>>Something you could be proud of is posting a recipe to Ophelia's request
>>for
>>cookies or something like that, instead of just chiming in with snarky
>>remarks about peoples religion, country, eating habits, husbands, wives,
>>etc. in every post. You don't get to regulate behavior, so give it up.
>>BTW,
>>you called ME a bitch a couple of years ago, but at least it wasn't the
>>*C*
>>word. LOL
>
> Years ago. That's how far you had to go back. Besides, you have a
> passive aggressive unpleasant side to you, so it was a diagnosis, not
> name calling.


I'm not at all passive and I can be very unpleasant when I need to be, but I
do have impulse control...so EOD and a good night to you.

Cheri

On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 22:29:30 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 20:42:06 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
>>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
om...
>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them.
>>>>>>>I'm
>>>>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>>>>many
>>>>>>>times.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>>>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also,
>>>>>you
>>>>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>>>>different
>>>>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>>>>and
>>>>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>>>>
>>>> Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
>>>> habit of offending people.
>>>>
>>>> Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
>>>> be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>>>
>>>
>>>Something you could be proud of is posting a recipe to Ophelia's request
>>>for
>>>cookies or something like that, instead of just chiming in with snarky
>>>remarks about peoples religion, country, eating habits, husbands, wives,
>>>etc. in every post. You don't get to regulate behavior, so give it up.
>>>BTW,
>>>you called ME a bitch a couple of years ago, but at least it wasn't the
>>>*C*
>>>word. LOL
>>
>> Years ago. That's how far you had to go back. Besides, you have a
>> passive aggressive unpleasant side to you, so it was a diagnosis, not
>> name calling.
>
>
>I'm not at all passive and I can be very unpleasant when I need to be, but I
>do have impulse control...so EOD and a good night to you.

Good night.

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Bruce" > wrote in message
...

> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
> just have no standards, I guess.


Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
times.

Cheri

==

Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
all

All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them quite
happily.

As I said, there would be no posts at all.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>>>times.
>>
>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>> people. There is no comparison.
>
>
>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a different
>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>and
>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.

Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
habit of offending people.

Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.

==

Or just tiring If someone want to control who posts to whom, they are
going to be a very frustrated and disappointed.

People who are so upset need their own moderated group. I will respond to
anyone I wish and all another can do is kf me.

Anyway, what are you cooking?


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:33:14 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
>wrote:
>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>>>>times.
>>>
>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>
>>
>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a different
>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>and
>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>
>Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
>habit of offending people.
>
>Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
>be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>
>==
>
>Or just tiring If someone want to control who posts to whom, they are
>going to be a very frustrated and disappointed.
>
>People who are so upset need their own moderated group. I will respond to
>anyone I wish and all another can do is kf me.

I didn't think we needed moderation for a bit of decency. But
apparently that is the case.

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Cheri" wrote in message news >
>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>
>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>> just have no standards, I guess.
>
>
>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>times.
>
>Cheri
>
>==
>
>Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>all

I'm only talking about one person.

>All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them quite
>happily.
>
>As I said, there would be no posts at all.

I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:33:14 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message
.. .
>
>On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
>wrote:
>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>many
>>>>times.
>>>
>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>
>>
>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>different
>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>and
>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>
>Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
>habit of offending people.
>
>Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
>be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>
>==
>
>Or just tiring If someone want to control who posts to whom, they are
>going to be a very frustrated and disappointed.
>
>People who are so upset need their own moderated group. I will respond to
>anyone I wish and all another can do is kf me.

I didn't think we needed moderation for a bit of decency. But
apparently that is the case.

==

But as you can see, some are calling you all kinds of stuff. Should I bin
you?



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Bruce" wrote in message news
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Cheri" wrote in message news >
>"Bruce" > wrote in message
.. .
>
>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>> just have no standards, I guess.
>
>
>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>times.
>
>Cheri
>
>==
>
>Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>all

I'm only talking about one person.

>All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them
>quite
>happily.
>
>As I said, there would be no posts at all.

I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.

==

Bruce, you have mentioned several people. Are you saying that everyone must
follow whatever you do and say?

It won't happen. That is the problem with an open group like this. I bet
some folk don't act in RL as they do here and if you are so upset then stick
them in your kf. You must know the problems I have had with certain
posters, but you still respond to them. Should I call you out and say you
have no standards. I guess you will do whatever you wish!

Now, back to cooking or will I be shoved in your kf?





--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:54:32 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message news >
>On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>"Cheri" wrote in message news >>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>
>>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>>> just have no standards, I guess.
>>
>>
>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>>times.
>>
>>Cheri
>>
>>==
>>
>>Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>>be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>>all
>
>I'm only talking about one person.
>
>>All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>>you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them
>>quite
>>happily.
>>
>>As I said, there would be no posts at all.
>
>I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
>that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.
>
>==
>
>Bruce, you have mentioned several people. Are you saying that everyone must
>follow whatever you do and say?
>
>It won't happen. That is the problem with an open group like this. I bet
>some folk don't act in RL as they do here and if you are so upset then stick
>them in your kf. You must know the problems I have had with certain
>posters, but you still respond to them. Should I call you out and say you
>have no standards. I guess you will do whatever you wish!
>
>Now, back to cooking or will I be shoved in your kf?

Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
I wouldn't be chummy with them.

And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
comment on it.

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:54:32 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message
>news >
>On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>"Cheri" wrote in message news >>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>
>>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>>> just have no standards, I guess.
>>
>>
>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>>times.
>>
>>Cheri
>>
>>==
>>
>>Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>>be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>>all
>
>I'm only talking about one person.
>
>>All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>>you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them
>>quite
>>happily.
>>
>>As I said, there would be no posts at all.
>
>I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
>that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.
>
>==
>
>Bruce, you have mentioned several people. Are you saying that everyone
>must
>follow whatever you do and say?
>
>It won't happen. That is the problem with an open group like this. I bet
>some folk don't act in RL as they do here and if you are so upset then
>stick
>them in your kf. You must know the problems I have had with certain
>posters, but you still respond to them. Should I call you out and say you
>have no standards. I guess you will do whatever you wish!
>
>Now, back to cooking or will I be shoved in your kf?

Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
I wouldn't be chummy with them.

And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
comment on it.

==

But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin, did
everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for decades.

Just look at yourself first. *I* know that people cannot be controlled,
either with threats of disdain or anything else.

I accept that other people have different views on others than mine, and I
just accept it. If I didn't I would no longer post here.

There are people here I would never have this conversation with. I expect
they are sneering at me as I do so)

So?




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
wrote:

>On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:54:32 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>"Bruce" wrote in message news >>
>>On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>"Cheri" wrote in message news >>>
>>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>>>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>>>> just have no standards, I guess.
>>>
>>>
>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>>>times.
>>>
>>>Cheri
>>>
>>>==
>>>
>>>Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>>>be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>>>all
>>
>>I'm only talking about one person.
>>
>>>All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>>>you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them
>>>quite
>>>happily.
>>>
>>>As I said, there would be no posts at all.
>>
>>I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
>>that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.
>>
>>==
>>
>>Bruce, you have mentioned several people. Are you saying that everyone must
>>follow whatever you do and say?
>>
>>It won't happen. That is the problem with an open group like this. I bet
>>some folk don't act in RL as they do here and if you are so upset then stick
>>them in your kf. You must know the problems I have had with certain
>>posters, but you still respond to them. Should I call you out and say you
>>have no standards. I guess you will do whatever you wish!
>>
>>Now, back to cooking or will I be shoved in your kf?
>
>Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
>this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
>I wouldn't be chummy with them.
>
>And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
>comment on it.

You're wasting your time - I have been blamed with regards to Julie, I
only countered once or twice, each time she openly lied about the
Canadian health care system, which of course she knows much more about
than I because she has a 'friend' in New Brunswick.

I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
put a quick end to that.

There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
everybody else!! Watch your back.

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin, did
>everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for decades.

That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
ages, except recently we agreed about something.

>Just look at yourself first. *I* know that people cannot be controlled,
>either with threats of disdain or anything else.
>
>I accept that other people have different views on others than mine, and I
>just accept it. If I didn't I would no longer post here.

Different views? "Canuck ****" is a different view?

>There are people here I would never have this conversation with. I expect
>they are sneering at me as I do so)

I don't know what that means.

>So?

People who are friendly to someone who abuses innocent people here on
a daily basis, suck. Now go to your troll and enjoy.

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:17:38 -0300, wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
>wrote:

>>Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
>>this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
>>I wouldn't be chummy with them.
>>
>>And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
>>comment on it.
>
>You're wasting your time - I have been blamed with regards to Julie, I
>only countered once or twice, each time she openly lied about the
>Canadian health care system, which of course she knows much more about
>than I because she has a 'friend' in New Brunswick.
>
>I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
>put a quick end to that.
>
>There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
>everybody else!! Watch your back.

Clearly. I misjudged them.

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:17:38 -0300, wrote:

>On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
>wrote:

>>Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
>>this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
>>I wouldn't be chummy with them.
>>
>>And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
>>comment on it.
>
>You're wasting your time - I have been blamed with regards to Julie, I
>only countered once or twice, each time she openly lied about the
>Canadian health care system, which of course she knows much more about
>than I because she has a 'friend' in New Brunswick.
>
>I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
>put a quick end to that.
>
>There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
>everybody else!! Watch your back.

Clearly. I misjudged them.

==

Was that Lucretia complaining about me!!! For information *I* put as stop to
speaking to HER because I was sick of HER diatribes !!!!!!!!!!

*I* put her in my killfile and if she says anything different she is a
bloody liar!!!!!

Lucretia you and I know the truth!! I don't know how you can live with
yourself. I can see that I did the right thing. You are not worth it.

Now, any more for any more????

Anybody else want to bully me??? Go ahead but you won't stop me from doing
what *I* want to do, so **** off into your moaning. Trust me, you are not
important enough for me to care about

There is nobody here here is so innocent and grand that they can boss
anyone around and force others to do they want. Others have tried it before
and it didn't get them very far either.

You need to look in the mirror, both of you.

I can't say I am surprised at Lucretia but I am surprised at you Bruce! We
always spoke to each other regardless of others causing trouble. Well,
enjoy your new friendships, they ought to be fun

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 9/5/2017 1:21 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Sep 2017 14:03:59 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, September 4, 2017 at 11:24:43 AM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
>>>
>>> I assume most of us on the east coast are watching this now.
>>>
>>> There's a huge number of fake hoopla sites about it. Reality is they
>>> are unsure how strong she will be, or where she will land (if she lands
>>> at all).
>>>
>>> Carol
>>>
>> I'm hoping she turns out into the Atlantic Ocean.
>
>
>
> There is VERY little chance of that, only one of the multiple models
> thinks it will go that ay.
>
> The OFCL (official National Hurricane Center) model shows it staying
> south of Florida and passing into the Gulf, but the 5 day model stops
> there, but looks like they might agree with me, that it will go out
> further into the Gulf before turning north. So Florida, especially
> the Keys, will likely get hit, but New Orleans and Houston better not
> relax.
>
>
>
>
I live in East Texas. Fortunately, I am far enough north that we were
not impacted by Harvey. However, we have about 750 evacuees from Harvey
in our evacuation center, and there are a number in hotels. We still
have some who arrived during Katrina who decided to take up permanent
residence. I hope Irma will not be as damaging as Harvey, but people
should be on the alert. I have often wondered how south Florida could
even evacuate because of the long, narrow configuration. Most of you
probably read reports over the years concerning how difficult (and
dangerous) evacuation from the Texas and Louisiana Gulf coast has been
over the years, and I think Florida faces even more difficult in trying
to evacuate. Houston will suffer for a very long time.

MaryL

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin, did
>everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for decades.

That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
ages, except recently we agreed about something.

==

LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
mistreated YOU ????

What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!

It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You are
Pathetic.

They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.

Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!

You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!

HYPOCRITE!!!!





--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

In article >,
says...
> Subject: Hurricane Irma
> From: Ophelia >
> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>
> "Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:17:38 -0300, wrote:
>
> >On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
> >wrote:
>
> > [quoted text muted]
> >I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
> >put a quick end to that.
> >
> >There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
> >everybody else!! Watch your back.
>
> Clearly. I misjudged them.
>
> ==
>
> Was that Lucretia complaining about me!!! For information *I* put as stop to
> speaking to HER because I was sick of HER diatribes !!!!!!!!!!
>
> *I* put her in my killfile and if she says anything different she is a
> bloody liar!!!!!
>
> Lucretia you and I know the truth!! I don't know how you can live with
> yourself. I can see that I did the right thing. You are not worth it.
>
> Now, any more for any more????
>
> Anybody else want to bully me??? Go ahead but you won't stop me from doing
> what *I* want to do, so **** off into your moaning. Trust me, you are not
> important enough for me to care about
>
> There is nobody here here is so innocent and grand that they can boss
> anyone around and force others to do they want. Others have tried it before
> and it didn't get them very far either.
>
> You need to look in the mirror, both of you.
>
> I can't say I am surprised at Lucretia but I am surprised at you Bruce! We
> always spoke to each other regardless of others causing trouble. Well,
> enjoy your new friendships, they ought to be fun
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>

LOL, the irony.


Janet UK

In article >,
says...
> Subject: Hurricane Irma
> From: Ophelia >
> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>
> "Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
> >But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin, did
> >everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for decades.
>
> That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
> ages, except recently we agreed about something.
>
> ==
>
> LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
> mistreated YOU ????
>
> What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!
>
> It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You are
> Pathetic.
>
> They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
> they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.
>
> Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!
>
> You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!
>
> HYPOCRITE!!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>

Hope you're paying attention, Gary (and Ds1) Sooner or later, all
this will be yours.

Janet UK

Ophelia wrote:
>
> "Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
> >But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin, did
> >everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for decades.
>
> That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
> ages, except recently we agreed about something.
>
> ==
>
> LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
> mistreated YOU ????
>
> What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!
>
> It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You are
> Pathetic.
>
> They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
> they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.
>
> Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!
>
> You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!
>
> HYPOCRITE!!!!

Talk to your friend, Cheri. Ophy has finally gone off the deep
end .
Sensitive her should at least not be on Usenet.
Strikes me as maybe a bit schizophrenic?
I have a family member that always thinks ppl are plotting
against her.

The Janet UK obsession thing with her seems way off balance.
Hopefully, I'm wrong but....

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Bruce" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>many
>>>>times.
>>>
>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>
>>
>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>different
>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>and
>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>
> Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
> habit of offending people.
>
> Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
> be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>
> ==
>
> Or just tiring If someone want to control who posts to whom, they are
> going to be a very frustrated and disappointed.
>
> People who are so upset need their own moderated group. I will respond to
> anyone I wish and all another can do is kf me.

To say nothing of the fact that most don't respond to filthy posts from
anyone, including Sheldon, but many of the so called troll posts have good
information and recipes which I will always respond to, unlike a few of the
hateful regulars who seem intent on hassling others over everything.

Cheri

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "Bruce" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin,
>> >did
>> >everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for
>> >decades.
>>
>> That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
>> ages, except recently we agreed about something.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
>> mistreated YOU ????
>>
>> What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!
>>
>> It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You
>> are
>> Pathetic.
>>
>> They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
>> they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.
>>
>> Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!
>>
>> You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!
>>
>> HYPOCRITE!!!!
>
> Talk to your friend, Cheri. Ophy has finally gone off the deep
> end .
> Sensitive her should at least not be on Usenet.
> Strikes me as maybe a bit schizophrenic?
> I have a family member that always thinks ppl are plotting
> against her.
>
> The Janet UK obsession thing with her seems way off balance.
> Hopefully, I'm wrong but....



Gotta love the psychiatrists in the group. LOL

Cheri

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "Bruce" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin,
>> >did
>> >everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for
>> >decades.
>>
>> That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
>> ages, except recently we agreed about something.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
>> mistreated YOU ????
>>
>> What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!
>>
>> It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You
>> are
>> Pathetic.
>>
>> They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
>> they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.
>>
>> Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!
>>
>> You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!
>>
>> HYPOCRITE!!!!
>
> Talk to your friend, Cheri. Ophy has finally gone off the deep
> end .
> Sensitive her should at least not be on Usenet.
> Strikes me as maybe a bit schizophrenic?
> I have a family member that always thinks ppl are plotting
> against her.
>
> The Janet UK obsession thing with her seems way off balance.
> Hopefully, I'm wrong but....



Gotta love the psychiatrists in the group. LOL

Cheri


==

<G>


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Bruce" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:21:58 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Bruce" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Tue, 5 Sep 2017 19:09:28 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>>still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll
>>>>many
>>>>times.
>>>
>>> I don't stalk people, I don't call people names, I'm not nasty to
>>> people. There is no comparison.
>>
>>
>>You don't consider calling someone a *bitch* to be name calling? Also, you
>>have been nasty to people on many occasions, but maybe you have a
>>different
>>idea of what constitutes nasty. At any rate, take care of your own posts
>>and
>>you will have plenty to do without worrying about who others respond to.
>
> Did I once call someone a bitch? If you say so, but I don't make a
> habit of offending people.
>
> Not speaking up when someone misbehaves badly in public, is nothing to
> be proud of. It's enabling and cowardly.
>
> ==
>
> Or just tiring If someone want to control who posts to whom, they are
> going to be a very frustrated and disappointed.
>
> People who are so upset need their own moderated group. I will respond to
> anyone I wish and all another can do is kf me.

To say nothing of the fact that most don't respond to filthy posts from
anyone, including Sheldon, but many of the so called troll posts have good
information and recipes which I will always respond to, unlike a few of the
hateful regulars who seem intent on hassling others over everything.

Cheri

==

Exactly! They should look at their own behaviour before criticizing others.
There doesn't seem to be too much cooking any more.

But watch them jump around with joy if they think they can join in a with a
bitching mob.

I am not interested



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "Bruce" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin,
>> >did
>> >everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for
>> >decades.
>>
>> That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
>> ages, except recently we agreed about something.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
>> mistreated YOU ????
>>
>> What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!
>>
>> It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You
>> are
>> Pathetic.
>>
>> They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
>> they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.
>>
>> Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!
>>
>> You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!
>>
>> HYPOCRITE!!!!
>
> Talk to your friend, Cheri. Ophy has finally gone off the deep
> end .
> Sensitive her should at least not be on Usenet.
> Strikes me as maybe a bit schizophrenic?
> I have a family member that always thinks ppl are plotting
> against her.
>
> The Janet UK obsession thing with her seems way off balance.
> Hopefully, I'm wrong but....



Gotta love the psychiatrists in the group. LOL

Cheri

==

Aww was that sweet lil Gary casting sunshine and joy around as he tip toes
along the path ...

LOLOL

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 9/5/2017 11:00 PM, Bruce wrote:
> Besides, you have a
> passive aggressive unpleasant side to you,


Oh Dr. Troll...Dr. Troll...project much here?

On 9/6/2017 2:39 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Cheri" wrote in message news >>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>>> just have no standards, I guess.
>>
>>
>> Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>> still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>> times.
>>
>> Cheri
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>> be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>> all
>
> I'm only talking about one person.
>
>> All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>> you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them quite
>> happily.
>>
>> As I said, there would be no posts at all.
>
> I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
> that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.
>
No one's buying it Bwuthie, you poor plaintive troll.

On 9/6/2017 2:54 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "Bruce"Â* wrote in message
> news >
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Cheri"Â* wrote in message news >>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>>> just have no standards, I guess.
>>
>>
>> Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>> still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>> times.
>>
>> Cheri
>>
>> ==
>>
>> Yes I agree!Â* If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should
>> not
>> be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>> all
>
> I'm only talking about one person.
>
>> All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to
>> whomever
>> you want to.Â* There are some in my killfile but others respond to them
>> quite
>> happily.
>>
>> As I said, there would be no posts at all.
>
> I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
> that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.
>
> ==
>
> Bruce, you have mentioned several people.Â* Are you saying that everyone
> must follow whatever you do and say?
>
> It won't happen.Â* That is the problem with an open group like this.Â* I
> bet some folk don't act in RL as they do here and if you are so upset
> then stick them in your kf.Â* You must know the problems I have had with
> certain posters, but you still respond to them.Â* Should I call you out
> and say you have no standards. I guess you will do whatever you wish!
>
> Now, back to cooking or will I be shoved in your kf?
>
>
>
>
>
You can HOPE!

On 9/6/2017 3:09 AM, Bruce wrote:
> Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
> this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
> I wouldn't be chummy with them.

But someone (unless it was YOU) wouldn't - she's too decent and
un-trollish, Bwuthie dear.

On 9/6/2017 4:17 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:54:32 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Bruce" wrote in message news >>>
>>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 09:29:05 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Cheri" wrote in message news >>>>
>>>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> The troll is easily killfiled, but I don't understand why seemingly
>>>>> sane people talk normally to this abusive stalker creep. Some people
>>>>> just have no standards, I guess.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Or simply refuse to have others here define the standards for them. I'm
>>>> still responding to you too even though you have been called a troll many
>>>> times.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>>
>>>> ==
>>>>
>>>> Yes I agree! If we all had to follow everyone who said someone should not
>>>> be responded to ... if you see what I mean ... there would be no posts at
>>>> all
>>>
>>> I'm only talking about one person.
>>>
>>>> All we can do, is accept that some don't get along and respond to whomever
>>>> you want to. There are some in my killfile but others respond to them
>>>> quite
>>>> happily.
>>>>
>>>> As I said, there would be no posts at all.
>>>
>>> I'm only talking about one person. If you don't have a problem with
>>> that person, you have no standards. You and a few others.
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> Bruce, you have mentioned several people. Are you saying that everyone must
>>> follow whatever you do and say?
>>>
>>> It won't happen. That is the problem with an open group like this. I bet
>>> some folk don't act in RL as they do here and if you are so upset then stick
>>> them in your kf. You must know the problems I have had with certain
>>> posters, but you still respond to them. Should I call you out and say you
>>> have no standards. I guess you will do whatever you wish!
>>>
>>> Now, back to cooking or will I be shoved in your kf?
>>
>> Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
>> this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
>> I wouldn't be chummy with them.
>>
>> And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
>> comment on it.
>
> You're wasting your time - I have been blamed with regards to Julie, I
> only countered once or twice, each time she openly lied about the
> Canadian health care system, which of course she knows much more about
> than I because she has a 'friend' in New Brunswick.
>
> I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
> put a quick end to that.
>
> There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
> everybody else!! Watch your back.
>

Says the world class atheist backstabber!

On 9/6/2017 4:58 AM, Bruce wrote:
> People who are friendly to someone who abuses innocent people here on
> a daily basis, suck. Now go to your troll and enjoy.

Stop projecting, troll.

On 9/6/2017 7:10 AM, l not -l wrote:
> On 5-Sep-2017, Casa de Masa > wrote:
>
>> On 9/5/2017 4:41 PM, l not -l wrote:
>>> As a proud Republican of 40 years, sadly a Republican of 50
>>> years; Trump is an abomination, unfit to be President of
>>> anything
>>> but, perhaps, the Kennel Club.
>>
>> Bullshit lie!
>>
>> He's a savvy, successful, seasoned industrialist with ACTUAL
>> KNOWLEDGE
>> of how business is done and how government interfaces with it!
> This says it all about you.


Oh goody, I do HOPE so!

> You are a well known half-wit
> (generous assesment) of dubious value as a human being; to be
> charitable, you are an excellent role model of a "bad example".

And your hateful diatribe seals your mantle as a partisan shitbag, and
an all around misanthrope.

Touche, asshole!

On 9/6/2017 7:19 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> "Bruce"Â* wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:17:38 -0300, wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>
>>> Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
>>> this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
>>> I wouldn't be chummy with them.
>>>
>>> And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
>>> comment on it.
>>
>> You're wasting your time - I have been blamed with regards to Julie, I
>> only countered once or twice, each time she openly lied about the
>> Canadian health care system, which of course she knows much more about
>> than I because she has a 'friend' in New Brunswick.
>>
>> I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
>> put a quick end to that.
>>
>> There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
>> everybody else!!Â* Watch your back.
>
> Clearly. I misjudged them.
>
> ==
>
> Was that Lucretia complaining about me!!! For information *I* put as
> stop to speaking to HER because I was sick of HER diatribes !!!!!!!!!!
>
> *I* put her in my killfile and if she says anything different she is a
> bloody liar!!!!!
>
> Lucretia you and I know the truth!!Â* I don't know how you can live with
> yourself.Â* I can see that I did the right thing.Â* You are not worth it.
>
> Now, any more for any more????
>
> Anybody else want to bully me???Â* Go ahead but you won't stop me from
> doing what *I* want to do, so **** off into your moaning.Â* Trust me, you
> are not important enough for me to care about
>
> There is nobody here here is soÂ* innocent and grand that they can boss
> anyone around and force others to do they want.Â* Others have tried it
> before and it didn't get them very far either.
>
> You need to look in the mirror, both of you.
>
> I can't say I am surprised at Lucretia but I am surprised at you Bruce!
> We always spoke to each otherÂ* regardless of others causing trouble.
> Well, enjoy your new friendships, they ought to be fun
>


And in the fullness of time the truth SHALL be known to all...

On 9/6/2017 7:59 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>> Subject: Hurricane Irma
>> From: Ophelia >
>> Newsgroups: rec.food.cooking
>>
>> "Bruce" wrote in message ...
>>
>> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 11:02:53 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> But you are quite chummy with a person who, until I put her in my bin, did
>>> everything she could to drive me off the group and had done so for decades.
>>
>> That must be Janet UK. She and I have been bitching at each other for
>> ages, except recently we agreed about something.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> LOL and you dare complain because I spoke to someone who YOU felt had
>> mistreated YOU ????
>>
>> What a Bloody Hypocrite!!!
>>
>> It's time you applied your standards for everyone else to yourself. You are
>> Pathetic.
>>
>> They are right, you are a troll. I never believed that but now I can see
>> they are right. All you are interested in is causing trouble.
>>
>> Well go right ahead, just don't involve me!
>>
>> You and your two new best pals can keep each other company in my bin!
>>
>> HYPOCRITE!!!!
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>>
>
> Hope you're paying attention, Gary (and Ds1) Sooner or later, all
> this will be yours.
>
> Janet UK
>

Says the vinegar-titted character assassin from the UK...

On 9/6/2017 8:13 AM, Gary wrote:
> The Janet UK obsession thing with her seems way off balance.

Only if you haven't watched old vinegar tits savage her over the years.

Are you wearing blinders?

On 9/6/2017 8:59 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> To say nothing of the fact that most don't respond to filthy posts from
> anyone, including Sheldon, but many of the so called troll posts have good
> information and recipes which I will always respond to, unlike a few of the
> hateful regulars who seem intent on hassling others over everything.
>
> Cheri
>
> ==
>
> Exactly!* They should look at their own behaviour before criticizing
> others. There doesn't seem to be too much cooking any more.
>
> But watch them jump around with joy if they think they can join in a
> with a bitching mob.
>
> I am not interested
>

RFC = bully culture.

Always has been, always will be.

Cooking is a mere pretense here for a great many, seriously.

"Ophelia" > whined:
> Anybody else want to bully me??? Go ahead but you won't
> stop me from doing what *I* want to do, so **** off into
> your moaning.
>

STFU, you miserable ****.

On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 14:19:34 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 07:17:38 -0300, wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 19:09:18 +1000, Bruce >
>>wrote:
>
>>>Let's put it this way: if someone said the things to you or Cheri that
>>>this person says to Lucretia today or to me or to others all the time,
>>>I wouldn't be chummy with them.
>>>
>>>And of course I'm not telling you or anyone what to do. But I'll
>>>comment on it.
>>
>>You're wasting your time - I have been blamed with regards to Julie, I
>>only countered once or twice, each time she openly lied about the
>>Canadian health care system, which of course she knows much more about
>>than I because she has a 'friend' in New Brunswick.
>>
>>I thought O and I were friends until I read a diatribe on here that
>>put a quick end to that.
>>
>>There's one set of rules for Cheri and O and quite another for
>>everybody else!! Watch your back.
>
>Clearly. I misjudged them.
>
>==
>
>Was that Lucretia complaining about me!!! For information *I* put as stop to
>speaking to HER because I was sick of HER diatribes !!!!!!!!!!

That could well be true, though non of my 'diatribes' were about you,
all I knew was thinking you were a friend I was very hurt to read what
you posted about me.
>
>*I* put her in my killfile and if she says anything different she is a
>bloody liar!!!!!

I am not saying anything different, I don't use a killfile, I just
don't read a persons posts once they transgress. Yelling about
killfiling people is so oooolllddd.
>
>Lucretia you and I know the truth!! I don't know how you can live with
>yourself. I can see that I did the right thing. You are not worth it.

I would love you to tell me exactly why, I never knew until I looked
here and saw nasty posts about me from you.
>
>Now, any more for any more????
>
>Anybody else want to bully me??? Go ahead but you won't stop me from doing
>what *I* want to do, so **** off into your moaning. Trust me, you are not
>important enough for me to care about

Well I know that - - now
>
>There is nobody here here is so innocent and grand that they can boss
>anyone around and force others to do they want. Others have tried it before
>and it didn't get them very far either.
>
>You need to look in the mirror, both of you.
>
>I can't say I am surprised at Lucretia but I am surprised at you Bruce! We
>always spoke to each other regardless of others causing trouble. Well,
>enjoy your new friendships, they ought to be fun

I feel you are carrying on because you do really know what I said was
true. The first time I tried to go past it because I thought your
back was troubling you, the second time, unforgivable.

On 9/6/2017 9:38 AM, Carol Shenkenberger wrote:
> "Ophelia" > whined:
>> Anybody else want to bully me??? Go ahead but you won't
>> stop me from doing what *I* want to do, so **** off into
>> your moaning.
>>
>
> STFU, you miserable ****.
>

You may leave - NOW.

On 9/6/2017 10:10 AM, wrote:
>> You need to look in the mirror, both of you.
>>
>> I can't say I am surprised at Lucretia but I am surprised at you Bruce! We
>> always spoke to each other regardless of others causing trouble. Well,
>> enjoy your new friendships, they ought to be fun
> I feel you are carrying on because you do really know what I said was
> true. The first time I tried to go past it because I thought your
> back was troubling you, the second time, unforgivable.

You are, in a word, irredeemable.