Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/22/2017 7:44 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:54 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:34:42 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >>> >>>> Victor Sack wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>> >>>>> cshenk > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Pressure cooker not suitable. >>>>> >>>>> Heston Blumenthal disagrees: >>>>> >>>>> >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec...._zt24/Z9oCO8kt >>>>> E5wJ> >> >>>>> Victor >>>> >>>> Sorry Victor, disagree. >>> >>> cshenk is phobic of being wrong. If the subject will be pursued, >>> she'll start complicated tribal dances to create such think smoke >>> screens that nobody realizes how wrong she was anymore. Or so she >>> thinks, but we all know better ![]() >> >> There is a difference in disagreeing that a pressure cooker used by a >> chef on a time budget leads to the same product as a long slow cooking, >> and whatever you think. >> >> You have yet to ever post a recipe. Even Julie has posted some. Some >> of them were even decent if plain by my standards. > > And there's that smoke screen! ![]() > GO on then troll - recipe up! Or bugger off forever, you asshole!~ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 20:39:54 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:34:42 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >> > Victor Sack wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > >> >> cshenk > wrote: >> >> >> >> > Pressure cooker not suitable. >> >> >> >> Heston Blumenthal disagrees: >> >> >> >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rec...._zt24/Z9oCO8kt >> >> E5wJ> >> >> >> Victor >> > >> > Sorry Victor, disagree. >> >> cshenk is phobic of being wrong. If the subject will be pursued, >> she'll start complicated tribal dances to create such think smoke >> screens that nobody realizes how wrong she was anymore. Or so she >> thinks, but we all know better ![]() > >There is a difference in disagreeing that a pressure cooker used by a >chef on a time budget leads to the same product as a long slow cooking, >and whatever you think. > snip taste tests have shown that of the three (side by side testing), standard cooking, pressure cooking and slow cooker cooking that slow cooker cooking produces the poorest results of taste, mouth feel and mineral extraction while the other two produce equal results. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: > Ok, what is bone broth? > What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created to make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just old-fashioned stock, made with bones. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/22/2017 10:13 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> bone broth will cost you another $20. > > -sw Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"barbie gee" > wrote in message
crg.pbz... > > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: > >> Ok, what is bone broth? >> > > What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created > to make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just > old-fashioned stock, made with bones. So true, they do that a lot with many terms these days. It's laughable really. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "barbie gee" > wrote in message crg.pbz... > > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: > >> Ok, what is bone broth? >> > > What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created > to make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just > old-fashioned stock, made with bones. Nope. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cheri" > wrote in message news ![]() > "barbie gee" > wrote in message > crg.pbz... >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: >> >>> Ok, what is bone broth? >>> >> >> What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created >> to make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just >> old-fashioned stock, made with bones. > > > So true, they do that a lot with many terms these days. It's laughable > really. I don't think that's true. Bone broth has more protein in it. https://www.epicurious.com/ingredien...-broth-article |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:42:38 -0400, Gary wrote: > >> Bone Broth is just the new trending name for stock. Made with >> bones. Same exact thing. It's just a marketing ploy to make >> people buy something they think might be new and improved. > > Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth > is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. Not the stuff I have. Tastes very good! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
news ![]() > > "Cheri" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> "barbie gee" > wrote in message >> crg.pbz... >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, what is bone broth? >>>> >>> >>> What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created >>> to make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just >>> old-fashioned stock, made with bones. >> >> >> So true, they do that a lot with many terms these days. It's laughable >> really. > > I don't think that's true. Bone broth has more protein in it. > > https://www.epicurious.com/ingredien...-broth-article It's still just stock and I really don't see any difference except in the name, more protein in stock is just a matter of what you put in it. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
news ![]() > > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > ... >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:42:38 -0400, Gary wrote: >> >>> Bone Broth is just the new trending name for stock. Made with >>> bones. Same exact thing. It's just a marketing ploy to make >>> people buy something they think might be new and improved. >> >> Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth >> is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. > > Not the stuff I have. Tastes very good! Agree, nothing tasteless about it. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/22/2017 10:17 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Bone broth > is virtually tasteless Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/23/2017 9:32 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> But they have to > adulterate it Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:42:38 -0400, Gary wrote: > > > Bone Broth is just the new trending name for stock. Made with > > bones. Same exact thing. It's just a marketing ploy to make > > people buy something they think might be new and improved. > > Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth > is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. Wrong. Bone broth is just a trending new description of stock. Don't look that up and go exact on us. Give me a break. -broth is made from meat only -stock is made from bones with nips of meat -true stock is made from bones with all meat stripped completely. No one does that. I've never made just broth - meat only. I do make broth/stock often (that's a combo of meat and bones) Normal definition of stock is like pick the roast Thanksgiving turkey clean the make stock out of the bones/carcass. That stock is very flavorful, much more than a chicken carcass picked clean. You're just being difficult. Stock as defined is bone broth. Same exact things just two names. Pay more for the nifty new name. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/23/2017 9:55 AM, Gary wrote:
> You're just being difficult. Stock as defined is bone broth. > Same exact things just two names. Pay more for the nifty > new name + 1! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
news ![]() > On 9/23/2017 9:55 AM, Gary wrote: >> You're just being difficult. Stock as defined is bone broth. >> Same exact things just two names. Pay more for the nifty >> new name > + 1! Or use the term to sound superior. LOL Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/23/2017 10:09 AM, Cheri wrote:
> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> On 9/23/2017 9:55 AM, Gary wrote: >>> You're just being difficult. Stock as defined is bone broth. >>> Same exact things just two names. Pay more for the nifty >>> new name >> *+ 1! > > > Or use the term to sound superior. LOL > > Cheri Ayup! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 23:13:22 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:45:39 -0600, U.S. Janet B. wrote: > >> Commercially packed cut bare beef bones available by the large bag in >> the frozen meats section at my Winco supermarket. Just exactly like >> what we used to be able to get in the meat department for free. Don't >> know about yours. I've never priced them because I don't do much with >> beef broth but it is clear what is in the bag. Bag is about the size >> of plastic shopping bag from the supermarket. > >Whole Foods sells them for a mere $4/lb. And the Whole Foods one-hour >class on making bone broth will cost you another $20. > >-sw wow. the dog really got some good treats I can remember my mother asking the butcher for a soup bone. It was free. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 10:32:31 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 01:14:57 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: > >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:42:38 -0400, Gary wrote: >>> >>>> Bone Broth is just the new trending name for stock. Made with >>>> bones. Same exact thing. It's just a marketing ploy to make >>>> people buy something they think might be new and improved. >>> >>> Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth >>> is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. >> >> Not the stuff I have. Tastes very good! > >Then it's not true bone broth. Bone broth is made from beef bones and >water - no meat, or less than 1% meat. If it tastes good then its >because manufacturers are adding stuff to it to make it more saleable >and passing it off as bone broth. Bone broth is (was) a health >concoction, not a culinary concoction by itself (but can be used to >add body to soups as long as you add other flavors). > >It appears that manufacturers have changed the definition lately to >capitalize on it purported health benefits. But they have to >adulterate it to sell it. > >-sw current recipes for it contain the same stuff that you would find in regular broth - some veggies and perhaps salt. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> > I don't think that's true. Bone broth has more protein in it. Get a life, Julie. A few posts back in this thread you had no idea what bone broth was. And bones have always creaped you out. Now you are an expert and giving opposing opinions? lol Bone broth is the same as stock. All made with mostly bones which YOU would never deal with in the first place. For opinions, you should stick to what you know and are experienced with. Anyone can google the subject and chime in. Stevers did. He knows nothing at all either except what an internet search told him. Hey....even the name is all wrong. Bone Broth should be called Bone Stock. It's a marketing ploy...New product name will get people to try the new product. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/23/2017 11:00 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I don't think I like your attitude. Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"U.S. Janet B." wrote:
> > my stores don't sell the bone broth for twice as much. There's either > just a couple cents difference or they just carry the bone broth at > the regular price. I will admit, lots of chicken stock at a certain price. The one chicken bone broth was from a different company. Same size box but almost twice as costly. So my comparison wasn't with the same brand, which would have been a more fair comparison. Hey though..just the name "bone broth" is wrong anyway. All from bones, it's the classic definition of stock. But Stevers wants to argue about pure bones...every morsel of meat scraped off of bones. what a choad. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/23/2017 11:31 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Somebody had **** Wheaties this morning. Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/23/2017 12:22 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> When's the last time you got laid? > > -sw Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!!!!!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> > Somebody had **** Wheaties this morning. Funny comment there, Steve. I grew up eating Wheaties. I loved that stuff. Going to the grocery store tomorrow to buy fresh milk and other things. I might add a small box of Wheaties for old time sake. It's been MANY years so that would be a blast from the past. > My experience with bone broth was how it used to be made. Not how > manufacturers are adulterating it now for marketing purposes. Bone broth never was "used to be made." It was called stock. And it still should be. Broth comes from meat, not bones. Bone broth would just be the nifty new way to describe mostly bones with some meat still attached. It's just a marketing ploy to sell stock under a new coined name. Get real. > And I > said as much. I didn't look anything up on the Internet as YOU did > (otherwise I would have known how it was currently marketed, duh). > > -sw Bone broth is not even broth. By definition, broth is made with meat only. Use bones and it's called stock. Right back at you. You certainly did research it all. I've never claimed to make broth or stock. I always call it broth/stock. What I make is a combination of both. Oh wait, I do make turkey STOCK once a year. Carcass with all meat picked off and frozen. The skeleton of a turkey (along with tiny bits) makes a good stock. It fits the definition. If I want to be a cool kid after this thanksgiving, I'll call it bone broth. It's trending now on the mainland. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 23 Sep 2017 11:55:03 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Sqwertz wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017 07:42:38 -0400, Gary wrote: >> >> > Bone Broth is just the new trending name for stock. Made with >> > bones. Same exact thing. It's just a marketing ploy to make >> > people buy something they think might be new and improved. >> >> Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth >> is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. > >Wrong. Bone broth is just a trending new description of stock. >Don't look that up and go exact on us. Give me a break. > >-broth is made from meat only >-stock is made from bones with nips of meat >-true stock is made from bones with all meat > stripped completely. No one does that. > >I've never made just broth - meat only. >I do make broth/stock often (that's a combo >of meat and bones) >Normal definition of stock is like pick the roast Thanksgiving >turkey clean the make stock out of the bones/carcass. > >That stock is very flavorful, much more than a chicken carcass >picked clean. > >You're just being difficult. Stock as defined is bone broth. >Same exact things just two names. Pay more for the nifty >new name. All BS, whether broth or consomme depends on whether stock is clarified. There is no such thing as "bone broth" because broth is clarified stock. Bone broth is definately not a culinary term, sounds like a Madison Ave. advertising term for squeezing dollars out of imbeciles who never cook. Most home cooks do not clarify their stock... I only clarify stock when I'm making Jewish Penicilian; clear golden soup. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, September 20, 2017 at 5:23:55 PM UTC-10, Julie Bove wrote:
> I know, I know. I *could* make my own but I won't. This stuff was super hot > for awhile. Has it fallen out of favor? I ran out. Tried to buy some at Fred > Meyer but the only kind they had was in the health food section and they > wanted over $7 for a tiny carton. I did order some online from Walmart, the > Sam's Choice brand. It tastes good. And it's cheap! > > Has something else replaced bone broth now? I think it has more protein than > the regular broth. I've had a few bowls of tonkotsu ramen which has the most amazing pork broth I have ever seen. It was as if there was butter somehow integrated into the soup, yet it wasn't greasy. It's like a butter broth except that it's made from pork bones. How they get it to be white is some kind of magic. Some pork bone broth ramen is ok but when they get it right, it's sublime. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RljeKmq5XBQ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Julie Bove wrote: > > "barbie gee" > wrote in message > crg.pbz... >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: >> >>> Ok, what is bone broth? >>> >> >> What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created to >> make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just old-fashioned >> stock, made with bones. > > Nope. > yeah, yeah, prove me wrong. That link to epicurious is vague and indistinct in the difference. Sounds like a stock variant, not a "new thing" called "bone broth". |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"barbie gee" > wrote in message
hcrg.pbz... > > > On Sat, 23 Sep 2017, Julie Bove wrote: > >> >> "barbie gee" > wrote in message >> crg.pbz... >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: >>> >>>> Ok, what is bone broth? >>>> >>> >>> What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation they've created >>> to make it sound like something magical. It's not. It's just >>> old-fashioned stock, made with bones. >> >> Nope. > > yeah, yeah, prove me wrong. > That link to epicurious is vague and indistinct in the difference. Sounds > like a stock variant, not a "new thing" called "bone broth". Agreed, it's BS, and that doesn't stand for bone broth. ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Sqwertz" wrote: > > Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth > > is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. > > Not the stuff I have. Tastes very good! Wow. Julie, yesterday you didn't even know what "bone broth" was, now you say that you have some and have even used it to know that it tastes very good? please spare us. If you're going to tell lies, at least write down the fake info so you will remember what you said and claimed. busted! You have just lost face here. Your name is mud. ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/24/2017 10:56 AM, Casa de Masa wrote:
> On 9/23/2017 6:23 PM, wrote: >> All BS, whether broth or consomme depends on whether stock is >> clarified.Â* There is no such thing as "bone broth" because broth is >> clarified stock.Â* Bone broth is definately not a culinary term, sounds >> like a Madison Ave. advertising term for squeezing dollars out of >> imbeciles who never cook. >> Most home cooks do not clarify their stock... I only clarify stock >> when I'm making Jewish Penicilian; clear golden soup. >> > > Lil' Wayne wants your kikey bone broth. LOL forged |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Julie Bove wrote: >> >> "Sqwertz" wrote: >> > Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth >> > is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. >> >> Not the stuff I have. Tastes very good! > > Wow. Julie, yesterday you didn't even know what "bone broth" was, > now you say that you have some and have even used it to know that > it tastes very good? please spare us. > > If you're going to tell lies, at least write down the fake info > so you will remember what you said and claimed. busted! > > You have just lost face here. Your name is mud. ![]() I buy and use bone broth. I don't make the stuff and I didn't have a carton to read the ingredients. Where are the lies? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 12:04:57 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Gary" > wrote in message ... >> Julie Bove wrote: >>> >>> "Sqwertz" wrote: >>> > Bone broth is very different from regular stock or broth. Bone broth >>> > is virtually tasteless compared to stock or broth. >>> >>> Not the stuff I have. Tastes very good! >> >> Wow. Julie, yesterday you didn't even know what "bone broth" was, >> now you say that you have some and have even used it to know that >> it tastes very good? please spare us. >> >> If you're going to tell lies, at least write down the fake info >> so you will remember what you said and claimed. busted! >> >> You have just lost face here. Your name is mud. ![]() > > I buy and use bone broth. I don't make the stuff and I didn't have a carton >to read the ingredients. Where are the lies? If it's your post it's ALL lies. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:53:17 -0500, cshenk wrote: > > > Thomas wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > >> Ok, what is bone broth? > > > > Bone broth is made mostly with bones and little meat. It will jell > > to consomme and have a deep flavor. > > Consomme is made from meat and tendon, not bones. > > -sw Consomme just means it jells. There are many ways to get it to do that. -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > news ![]() > > > >"Cheri" > wrote in message > news ![]() > crg.pbz... > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Thomas wrote: > > > > > > > > > Ok, what is bone broth? > > > > > > > > > > > > > What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation > > > > they've created to make it sound like something magical. It's > > > > not. It's just old-fashioned stock, made with bones. > > > > > > > > > So true, they do that a lot with many terms these days. It's > > > laughable really. > > > > I don't think that's true. Bone broth has more protein in it. > > > > https://www.epicurious.com/ingredien...k-broth-bone-b > > roth-article > > > It's still just stock and I really don't see any difference except in > the name, more protein in stock is just a matter of what you put in > it. > > Cheri Hi Cheri, I think the diference is the real stuff you can make at home, vs. the palid stuff from the store. HUGE difference there. -- |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 23:23:12 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >> > >> >"Cheri" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >> crg.pbz... >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > What we used to call "stock". It's a stupid affectation >> > > > they've created to make it sound like something magical. It's >> > > > not. It's just old-fashioned stock, made with bones. >> > > >> > > >> > > So true, they do that a lot with many terms these days. It's >> > > laughable really. >> > >> > I don't think that's true. Bone broth has more protein in it. >> > >> > https://www.epicurious.com/ingredien...k-broth-bone-b >> > roth-article >> >> >> It's still just stock and I really don't see any difference except in >> the name, more protein in stock is just a matter of what you put in >> it. >> >> Cheri > >Hi Cheri, I think the diference is the real stuff you can make at home, >vs. the palid stuff from the store. HUGE difference there. Cheri is against criticism of store bought stuff. Careful or she'll killfile you. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 24 Sep 2017 23:18:47 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 17:53:17 -0500, cshenk wrote: >> >> > Thomas wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > >> >> Ok, what is bone broth? >> > >> > Bone broth is made mostly with bones and little meat. It will jell >> > to consomme and have a deep flavor. >> >> Consomme is made from meat and tendon, not bones. >> >> -sw > >Consomme just means it jells. There are many ways to get it to do >that. Failed Culinary 101! Consomme is CLARIFIED stock. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consomm%C3%A9 https://www.thespruce.com/what-is-consomme-995766 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Makin' bone broth | General Cooking | |||
Getting More Gel in Bone Broth | General Cooking | |||
Best Crock Pot for Bone Broth | General Cooking | |||
No Gelatin in Bone Broth | General Cooking | |||
Bone In T-bone by OmManiPadmeOmelet | General Cooking |