On 9/29/2017 2:13 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:01:05 -0600, Casa de Masa > wrote:
>
>> On 9/29/2017 1:27 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> Many of his women ended up with good careers, thanks to the
>>>> initial nudie shoot.
>>> Depends what you call a good career.
>>
>>
>> Ask:
>>
>> Marilyn Monroe
>>
>> Debby Harry
>>
>> Pam Anderson
>>
>> Barbie Benton
>>
>> Jenny McCarthy
>>
>> Kate Moss
>>
>> et al...
>
> Ok, you made the usual mistake of equating a lot of money to a good
> career.

Yeah right, they all had TERRIBLE careers...

Anything to sustain your argumentative delusions Bwuthie dear.

> And boy did Marilyn Monroe make a great life for herself. A bit on the
> short side, but you can't have it all.

Hanging with the Kennedys has its own risk profile, as Mary Jo Kopechne
found out.

Deal.

Ya moron.

On 9/29/2017 1:45 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:11:51 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> Janet wrote:
>>>
>>> Your post demonstrates exactly why Playboy was so objectionable; it
>>> encouraged men like you to treat women as you do.
>>
>> Oh whine on, Janet UK. Playboy magazine was only objectionable to
>> you women that never qualified to get photographed. Envy is your
>> problem. Not good enough to be desired and never got paid well
>> for a photoshoot.
>>
>> Compared to the other nudie magazines, Playboy was high class.
>>
>> Many of his women ended up with good careers, thanks to the
>> initial nudie shoot.
>
> Steve's post was to the point and a good argument.

The same "Steve" who treats women like DIRT?

Wow.

> Your post is nasty
> and unnecessary.

It's "nasty and unnecessary" to note the many Playboy bunnies who had
really great careers as a result of their 'exposure'?

Why?

> Janet B in the United States

Who posted pics of her own daughter being groped by that serial rapist
Bill Clinton no less!

Wow.

On 2017-09-29 1:40 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 12:22:18 -0400, jmcquown >

> I guess when you look at the clothing the 'bunnies' were required to
> wear you do realise how much respect he had for women - every dirty
> minded little boy claimed they read it because of the articles.

Oh poppycock. Yes, there were photos of naked women, and yes, they were
doctored to look ideal. If someone was interested only in the pictures
there are many magazines that showed lots more, and without the good
articles. I already pointed out some of the leading authors whose works
were featured in Playboy and some of the prominent celebrities, authors
and politicians who were featured in their world class interviews.

On 2017-09-29 4:02 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:49:16 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy

> No plunging necklines, bunny tails on their behinds and ears on their
> heads. Not normal clothing for work.

I am curious on your take of the Slut Walk and the rhetoric of its
participants who say that women should be able to wear whatever they
want without fear of people calling them sluts.

On 2017-09-29 4:04 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:59:59 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
> > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:56:43 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Roy wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 7:02:35 AM UTC-6, wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
>>>>>> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
>>>>>> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
>>>>>> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
>>>>>> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
>>>>>> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
>>>>>> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
>>>>>> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, I agree. He did nothing for women exept EXPLOIT them while freeing
>>>>> them of their dignity and making them whores.
>>>>> ====
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> NO one forced those gals to disrobe, Roy...for a number of them it was a ticket to a new career and a new life...
>>>
>>> Oh? So they could have worked in his club with normal clothes on?
>>
>>
>> Of *course* not, have you never heard the term "dress code"...??? Even *I* have a work dress code, I'd prefer wearing shorts, t - shirts, and sneakers, but I need the job so I follow the dress code...no disgrace in that.
>
> But does the dress code at your work demean you ?

What exactly is demeaning about wearing clothing that will encourage
people to treat you nicely and give you money? I think it is demeaning
to be expected to get down on your hands and knees and scrape up shit.
Being complimented and getting big dips for exposing cleavage is the
sort of thing some people would call easy money.

>

On 2017-09-29 4:14 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:29:25 +1000, Bruce >
> wrote:

> I knew that when I made the first response but all these years later I
> have never forgotten that cruel cartoon about Betty Ford. I didn't
> buy Playboy, it was left open on a table at work, to that page.
> However if some people admire men like that, especially if they are a
> woman, good luck to them, may they have a similar one in their life
> Meant to read something like the Chinese 'may you live in interesting
> times' curse.

Over the years I saw a lot of excellent cartoons in Playboy. I don't
remember the one that put a pickle up your butt.

On 9/29/2017 2:13 PM, Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> The one great thing Hugh Heffner did is fight against censorship. No
>> one was forced to subscribe to his magazine or go to the "Bunny" clubs.
>> He was pretty much the first publisher to push the envelope for freedom
>> of speech. And, BTW, there were some actual articles in that magazine
>> that didn't have anything to do with sex. And some funny cartoons, too.
>>
>> Sure, that's not the reason people subscribed to it. But there was
>> content that was not all about sex.
>
> Playboy magazine certainly had first class articles. The nude
> photos were actually taken with class. Showed the women naked but
> still classy. Other magazines made the nude women look like
> sluts. Big difference. Playboy magazine outclassed all the
> others.
>
I'll bet some people are scrounging around in old boxes right now hoping
they still have the one and only Norma Jean Baker (Marilyn Monroe)
edition of Playboy circa 1959. Worth a pretty penny!

Jill

On 9/29/2017 2:17 PM, Cheri wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 12:43:08 PM UTC-5,
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oh?* So they could have worked in his club with normal clothes on?
>>>
>>>
>> NO one forced those women to seek jobs that the Playboy Club, no
>> one.* No one forces the girls at Hooters to wear low cut, tight
>> T shirts and be amply endowed either.* If they object to the
>> attire they are expected to wear then they need to seek employ-
>> ment elsewhere.* There will always be bars, clubs, strip joints,
>> etc. and those choosing to work in these establishments know the
>> type of place they are seeking employment at before walking through
>> the door.* If they're going to whine, be embarrassed, feel degraded,
>> feel exploited it's best to look elsewhere for a job.
>>
>> They seek employment at these places because they know they're
>> going to be receiving some hefty tips.* They're not working in
>> these places because they'll be receiving paid health benefits
>> and a pension plan.
>
> But I do believe they did have those benefits, more than one had this to
> say:
>
> "Overall pretty satisfied with the benefits package. Company matches
> 401K contributions and vision plan is paid for by the company. Company
> is extremely flexible and there are some perks."
>
>
Like it or not, Hugh Hefner and the Playboy Brand was/is iconic. I'm
quite sure the company paid the employees well and also could afford to
pay health benefits. I'd like to hear from some McDonalds or WalMart
employees who get paid health coverage and a matching 401K plan.

Jill

wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
> > wrote:
>
> > Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual
> > morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>
> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!

I am sorry for anyone's death but Hugh Hefner's legacy was to make it
seem women *enjoyed* being exploited and to publically make it seem so.

--

On 9/29/2017 9:02 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
> > wrote:
>
>> Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>
> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
>

I doubt he penned that cartoon himself. He was a publisher, not the
artist or the author. He probably should have paid more attention
because what you describe is definitely in poor taste.

Then again, you noticed it, didn't you? Did your husband have a
subscription? I'd never heard of this Betty Ford cartoon until you
brought it up here.

Jill

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 18:23:11 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-09-29 4:14 PM, wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Sep 2017 05:29:25 +1000, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>
>> I knew that when I made the first response but all these years later I
>> have never forgotten that cruel cartoon about Betty Ford. I didn't
>> buy Playboy, it was left open on a table at work, to that page.
>> However if some people admire men like that, especially if they are a
>> woman, good luck to them, may they have a similar one in their life
>> Meant to read something like the Chinese 'may you live in interesting
>> times' curse.
>
>Over the years I saw a lot of excellent cartoons in Playboy. I don't
>remember the one that put a pickle up your butt.
>
Now why doesn't that surprise me that your attitude to a cruel cartoon
would be just that.

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 10:02:29 -0300, wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
> wrote:
>
>>Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>
>Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
>Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
>breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
>what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
>silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
>my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
>uncalled for (...)

Disgusting.

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:51:22 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual
>> > morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>>
>> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
>> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
>> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
>> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
>> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
>> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
>> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
>> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
>
>I am sorry for anyone's death but Hugh Hefner's legacy was to make it
>seem women *enjoyed* being exploited and to publically make it seem so.

I was hoping women had seen at least a little light these days, but
not around here it seems

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:01:49 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 9/29/2017 9:02 AM, wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>>
>> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
>> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
>> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
>> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
>> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
>> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
>> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
>> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
>>
>
>I doubt he penned that cartoon himself. He was a publisher, not the
>artist or the author. He probably should have paid more attention
>because what you describe is definitely in poor taste.

I'm sure back then he would have okayed it where it was clearly meant
to be Betty Ford. It was cruel, not just poor taste. She spoke about
how she felt about the op etc to encourage other women back then to
talk about lumps in the breast etc.
>
>Then again, you noticed it, didn't you? Did your husband have a
>subscription? I'd never heard of this Betty Ford cartoon until you
>brought it up here.
>
>Jill
I sat down at a table to have my sandwich at work and the magazine was
laying open at that page. Thankfully David would not have wasted his
money on a subscription, it was a time when we both worked hard to get
the best for our three kids but then, you wouldn't understand that
sort of thing would you?

On 9/29/2017 5:19 PM, wrote:
>> Then again, you noticed it, didn't you? Did your husband have a
>> subscription? I'd never heard of this Betty Ford cartoon until you
>> brought it up here.
>>
>> Jill
> I sat down at a table to have my sandwich at work and the magazine was
> laying open at that page. Thankfully David would not have wasted his
> money on a subscription, it was a time when we both worked hard to get
> the best for our three kids but then, you wouldn't understand that
> sort of thing would you?

Wow.

Are you accusing her of never _working_???

You are a real poison shrew.

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:15:27 -0300, wrote:

>On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:51:22 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> > Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual
>>> > morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>>>
>>> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
>>> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
>>> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue with
>>> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
>>> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas is
>>> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
>>> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
>>> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
>>
>>I am sorry for anyone's death but Hugh Hefner's legacy was to make it
>>seem women *enjoyed* being exploited and to publically make it seem so.
>
>I was hoping women had seen at least a little light these days, but
>not around here it seems

I think it's culture + age. Another culture and another age group
would be a very different story.

On 9/29/2017 6:51 PM, cshenk wrote:

> I am sorry for anyone's death but Hugh Hefner's legacy was to make it
> seem women *enjoyed* being exploited and to publically make it seem so.
>

I wonder if they felt exploited when the checks were cashed

On 2017-09-29 7:19 PM, wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:01:49 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> Then again, you noticed it, didn't you? Did your husband have a
>> subscription? I'd never heard of this Betty Ford cartoon until you
>> brought it up here.
>>
>> Jill
> I sat down at a table to have my sandwich at work and the magazine was
> laying open at that page. Thankfully David would not have wasted his
> money on a subscription, it was a time when we both worked hard to get
> the best for our three kids but then, you wouldn't understand that
> sort of thing would you?
>

Okay. Jill and I, who have no problems admitting that we read and
enjoyed Playboy magazine and do not remember that cartoon. You claim to
have come across an open magazine with it.

wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:51:22 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual
> >> > morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
> >>
> >> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
> >> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
> >> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue
> with >> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
> >> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas
> is >> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
> >> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
> >> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
> >
> > I am sorry for anyone's death but Hugh Hefner's legacy was to make
> > it seem women enjoyed being exploited and to publically make it
> > seem so.
>
> I was hoping women had seen at least a little light these days, but
> not around here it seems

I think its difficult to even discuss it here. Too many who do not want
to discuss and instead be trolls.


--

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 21:25:25 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 17:51:22 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> > wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 04:40:44 -0700 (PDT), Ding - Dong Daddy
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual
>> >> > morality. Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...
>> >>
>> >> Speak for yourself! He was a nasty, grasping dirty old man. Betty
>> >> Ford, in her day was brave for being frank and admitting she had
>> >> breast cancer. What did he do? A cartoon in the December issue
>> with >> what was clearly the White House at night with a one breasted
>> >> silhouette leaning out the window saying 'All I want for Christmas
>> is >> my right breast' - cruel in the extreme, totally unnecessary and
>> >> uncalled for and I certainly don't feel I owe him squat. In fact,
>> >> THREE CHEERS THE DIRTY BUGGER IS DEAD AT LAST!!
>> >
>> > I am sorry for anyone's death but Hugh Hefner's legacy was to make
>> > it seem women enjoyed being exploited and to publically make it
>> > seem so.
>>
>> I was hoping women had seen at least a little light these days, but
>> not around here it seems
>
>I think its difficult to even discuss it here. Too many who do not want
>to discuss and instead be trolls.

So far only Cheri's friend, the Boner Troll.

On 9/29/2017 9:51 PM, Bruce wrote:
> So far only Cheri's friend, the Boner Troll.

Friendly Bwuthe, the troll who divides, but never conquers.

> wrote in message
...
> On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 1:18:44 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> > They seek employment at these places because they know they're
>> > going to be receiving some hefty tips. They're not working in
>> > these places because they'll be receiving paid health benefits
>> > and a pension plan.
>>
>> But I do believe they did have those benefits, more than one had this to
>> say:
>>
>> "Overall pretty satisfied with the benefits package. Company matches 401K
>> contributions and vision plan is paid for by the company. Company is
>> extremely flexible and there are some perks."
>>
>>
> I could see Playboy providing these benefits but your local strip
> joint, I don't think so.



No, I think not on that.

Cheri

In article >,
Ding - Dong Daddy > wrote:

> Yup...Hef liberated gals from the constraints of prudish sexual morality.
> Women everywhere owe him a HUGE debt of gratitude...

Don't know nothin' 'bout supposedly sordid stuff, but if you like "A
Christmas Story", check this out. Search within the open browser window
for "Playboy".
<http://www.achristmasstoryhouse.com/...ie-facts/trivi
a/>.
How I loved Jean Shepherd's articles of his childhood in Hammond,
Indiana. I prudently cut all the sketchy stuff out of Playboy before I
read Shepherd articles ;-) Yup. I bought Playboy for the articles. I
also have a bridge for sale.
This post's content may already be addressed down-thread by someone
else, and if so, I'm looking forward to reading it.

leo

jmcquown wrote:
>
> I'll bet some people are scrounging around in old boxes right now hoping
> they still have the one and only Norma Jean Baker (Marilyn Monroe)
> edition of Playboy circa 1959. Worth a pretty penny!

I've seen that issue show up on "Pawn Stars" once or twice.
First issue was December 1953 and Marilyn Monroe was there.
I only remember that bit of trivia because it was the
year I was born. The year of the bunny.

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:54:17 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2017-09-29 7:19 PM, wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:01:49 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Then again, you noticed it, didn't you? Did your husband have a
>>> subscription? I'd never heard of this Betty Ford cartoon until you
>>> brought it up here.
>>>
>>> Jill
>> I sat down at a table to have my sandwich at work and the magazine was
>> laying open at that page. Thankfully David would not have wasted his
>> money on a subscription, it was a time when we both worked hard to get
>> the best for our three kids but then, you wouldn't understand that
>> sort of thing would you?
>>
>
>Okay. Jill and I, who have no problems admitting that we read and
>enjoyed Playboy magazine and do not remember that cartoon. You claim to
>have come across an open magazine with it.

I am NOT in the habit of lying, you probably are, that's why you
automatically assume everyone else is the same.

On 9/30/2017 4:59 AM, wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 20:54:17 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2017-09-29 7:19 PM, wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 19:01:49 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Then again, you noticed it, didn't you? Did your husband have a
>>>> subscription? I'd never heard of this Betty Ford cartoon until you
>>>> brought it up here.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>> I sat down at a table to have my sandwich at work and the magazine was
>>> laying open at that page. Thankfully David would not have wasted his
>>> money on a subscription, it was a time when we both worked hard to get
>>> the best for our three kids but then, you wouldn't understand that
>>> sort of thing would you?
>>>
>>
>> Okay. Jill and I, who have no problems admitting that we read and
>> enjoyed Playboy magazine and do not remember that cartoon. You claim to
>> have come across an open magazine with it.
>
> I am NOT in the habit of lying, you probably are, that's why you
> automatically assume everyone else is the same.
>

Much as I personally revile you I do laud your compact if convenient
honesty.

On 9/30/2017 6:46 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> Too many parents leave the raising of their children to the Internet.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>
> In some cases the internet does a better job.

That sounds glib but I sincerely doubt it's real world efficacy.

On Friday, September 29, 2017 at 9:39:06 AM UTC-10, Casa de Masa wrote:
>
> And still...
>
> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...res-1960s.html
>
> A recruitment brochure for Bunnies working at Hugh Hefner's Playboy
> Clubs in the early 1960s touts custom outfits, a glamorous lifestyle,
> access to celebrities and promises 'you'll earn far more than other girls..'
>
> Playboy Clubs were exclusive bars, nightclubs and casinos that served
> food and drink from 11.30am until 'the wee small hours' that began
> opening in 1960 and thrived from Las Vegas and New York to London and
> Tokyo through the 1980s.
>
> The lovely young waitresses and servers were the the signature
> attraction at the clubs. Each one wore a skimpy bunny costumes -
> complete with ears and a bushy tail.
>
> Some of the Bunnies were former Playboy magazine models, but most were
> aspiring actresses, models, singers or other ambitious women who were
> hoping to tap into the glamorous world of Playboy.

I think you're right about the girls wanting to be a part of that glamorous world. The patriots of the clubs shared a similar vision. If you can sell access to a world that folks long to inhabit, you'll probably make it rich. Starbucks isn't selling coffee - it's selling a lifestyle.

On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
> no one can convince me that Cathelic parents aren't knowingly
> sacrificing their six year old boys and girls to be gang banged in the
> name of Jesus. a lie who never lived, a fake aparition.

Wow, you really are a naked sack of hatred and evil.

WTF happened to you to provoke that unseemly outburst?

On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
> I've never cheated on a spouse but I've been cheated on, because females have
> always been the biggest cheaters simply because they can much more
> easily cheat.

How so?

Do you posit their private parts are somehow more accessible?

Or that they have special no-tell motel privileges?

Please illumine us.

On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
> Most females cheat within
> thirty days of their wedding...

WTF?!?!?!


? 50% of their kids aren't their
> husbands.

WTF?!?!?!

> Now it's easy to prove but not too long ago couldnt.

Yeah well, proof up - let's see it now!

"Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
news
> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>> no one can convince me that Cathelic parents aren't knowingly
>> sacrificing their six year old boys and girls to be gang banged in the
>> name of Jesus. a lie who never lived, a fake aparition.
>
> Wow, you really are a naked sack of hatred and evil.
>
> WTF happened to you to provoke that unseemly outburst?

Ignorance.

Cheri

"Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
news
> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>> Most females cheat within
>> thirty days of their wedding...
>
> WTF?!?!?!
>
>
> ? 50% of their kids aren't their
>> husbands.
>
> WTF?!?!?!
>
>> Now it's easy to prove but not too long ago couldnt.
>
> Yeah well, proof up - let's see it now!


Or have another drink.

Cheri

"Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
news
> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>> I've never cheated on a spouse but I've been cheated on, because females
>> have
>> always been the biggest cheaters simply because they can much more
>> easily cheat.
>
> How so?
>
> Do you posit their private parts are somehow more accessible?
>
> Or that they have special no-tell motel privileges?
>
> Please illumine us.


Yes, I'm sure with his five marriages every one of them cheated on him
within 30 days, if waiting that long. LOL

Cheri

On 9/30/2017 7:38 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
> news
>> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>>> I've never cheated on a spouse but I've been cheated on, because
>>> females have
>>> always been the biggest cheaters simply because they can much more
>>> easily cheat.
>>
>> How so?
>>
>> Do you posit their private parts are somehow more accessible?
>>
>> Or that they have special no-tell motel privileges?
>>
>> Please illumine us.
>
>
> Yes, I'm sure with his five marriages every one of them cheated on him
> within 30 days, if waiting that long. LOL
>
> Cheri

Obviously he's an expert on women. This from a guy who claims he
delivered groceries (or was it newspapers?) as a teen and lonely middle
aged housewives invited him inside to have sex with them. I never
believed those tall tales, either.

Jill

On 9/30/2017 4:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> Trust me, lack of sex wasn't an issue between us.Â* That was just the
> last straw.
>
> Jill


TMI!!!!!

On 9/30/2017 5:36 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
> news
>> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>>> no one can convince me that Cathelic parents aren't knowingly
>>> sacrificing their six year old boys and girls to be gang banged in the
>>> name of Jesus. a lie who never lived, a fake aparition.
>>
>> Wow, you really are a naked sack of hatred and evil.
>>
>> WTF happened to you to provoke that unseemly outburst?
>
> Ignorance.
>
> Cheri

In spades!

On 9/30/2017 5:37 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
> news
>> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>>> Most females cheat within
>>> thirty days of their wedding...
>>
>> WTF?!?!?!
>>
>>
>> ? 50% of their kids aren't their
>>> husbands.
>>
>> WTF?!?!?!
>>
>>> Now it's easy to prove but not too long ago couldnt.
>>
>> Yeah well, proof up - let's see it now!
>
>
> Or have another drink.
>
> Cheri

<GLUG!>

early for the crystal palace too...

On 9/30/2017 5:38 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
> news
>> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>>> I've never cheated on a spouse but I've been cheated on, because
>>> females have
>>> always been the biggest cheaters simply because they can much more
>>> easily cheat.
>>
>> How so?
>>
>> Do you posit their private parts are somehow more accessible?
>>
>> Or that they have special no-tell motel privileges?
>>
>> Please illumine us.
>
>
> Yes, I'm sure with his five marriages every one of them cheated on him
> within 30 days, if waiting that long. LOL
>
> Cheri


He had a run of uncommonly poor human luck for sure!

On 9/30/2017 6:01 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/30/2017 7:38 PM, Cheri wrote:
>> "Casa de Masa" > wrote in message
>> news
>>> On 9/30/2017 2:38 PM, wrote:
>>>> I've never cheated on a spouse but I've been cheated on, because
>>>> females have
>>>> always been the biggest cheaters simply because they can much more
>>>> easily cheat.
>>>
>>> How so?
>>>
>>> Do you posit their private parts are somehow more accessible?
>>>
>>> Or that they have special no-tell motel privileges?
>>>
>>> Please illumine us.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I'm sure with his five marriages every one of them cheated on him
>> within 30 days, if waiting that long. LOL
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Obviously he's an expert on women.* This from a guy who claims he
> delivered groceries (or was it newspapers?) as a teen and lonely middle
> aged housewives invited him inside to have sex with them.* I never
> believed those tall tales, either.
>
> Jill


But they would have been all the rage in the Penthouse letters section...