Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/5/2017 5:56 PM, Bruce wrote:
> What do you have to do if you want to buy peanuts, just peanuts? Raid > a peanut farm? Kidnap a peanut farmer? Go to the store and get: https://www.walmart.ca/en/ip/planter.../6000001847221 https://nuts.com/nuts/peanuts/jumbo-...d-inshell.html https://www.whitleyspeanut.com/prod_...anuts-in-shell |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/5/2017 6:36 PM, l not -l wrote:
> > On 5-Oct-2017, Bruce > wrote: > >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 18:53:44 -0500, "cshenk" > >> wrote: >> >>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>> >>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:30:26 -0500, Sqwertz >>>> > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:21:05 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> why is it that we get waves of trolls here at times. >>>>>> don't you >>>>>> people have anything better to do than spread your idiocy >>>>>> on a >>>>>> cooking board? >>>>> >>>>> Casa Boner invited them. >>>>> >>>>> Speaking of nuts, I haven't had Planters Dry Roasted >>>>> Peanuts for >>>>> probably 20 years. I forgot they were pretty good (and >>>>> now >>>>> advertised as "good for you" <shrug>). A big 34.5oz jug >>>>> was only >>>>> $4.50 (after $1.50 coupon). >>>> >>>> Ingredients: >>>> >>>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, >>>> SPICES >>>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, >>>> NATURAL FLAVOR, >>>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >>>> MALTODEXTRIN. >>>> >>>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be >>>> turned >>>> into a science project. >>> >>> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >> >> What do you have to do if you want to buy peanuts, just >> peanuts? Raid >> a peanut farm? Kidnap a peanut farmer? > Bless your heart. Order raw peanuts from nutstop.com. Or, if > you don't mind a little residual oil with your peanuts, you can > go to Trader Joe's for roasted Unsalted Blistered Peanuts. If > you won't have a coronary over it, you could get TJ's regular > Blistered Peanuts which have residual oil from roasting and salt. > I'm sure that if one would expend their effort looking, versus > complaining, they'd find many other sources. > > Have a blessed day. > Every supermarket in the US sells roasted peanuts in the shell. No biggie. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:17:48 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote: >On 10/5/2017 4:37 PM, Bruce wrote: >>> No, the trolls are usenet are much grungier, older people. It no >>> longer has anything to do with school. >> Yes, of course. There's only one troll here at the moment > >Uh, you Sqwerty, a host of forgers - yer math sucks, troll. Yes, ok, you and 2 forgers. But Sqwerts the stalker is you, right? So that leaves you and your forger (Sqwertz?) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/5/2017 10:25 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:17:48 -0600, Casa lo pensa > > wrote: > >> On 10/5/2017 4:37 PM, Bruce wrote: >>>> No, the trolls are usenet are much grungier, older people. It no >>>> longer has anything to do with school. >>> Yes, of course. There's only one troll here at the moment >> >> Uh, you Sqwerty, a host of forgers - yer math sucks, troll. > > Yes, ok, you and 2 forgers. Nope, you & Sqwerty are the 2 trolls. > But Sqwerts the stalker is you, right? I dunno, ya think? > So that leaves you and your forger (Sqwertz?) Sqwerty is the forger? Do tell! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:29:33 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote: >On 10/5/2017 10:25 PM, Bruce wrote: >> But Sqwerts the stalker is you, right? > >I dunno, ya think? I axed ya. >> So that leaves you and your forger (Sqwertz?) > >Sqwerty is the forger? > >Do tell! Just my guess. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "ImStillMags" > wrote in message ... > why is it that we get waves of trolls here at times. don't you people > have anything better to do than spread your idiocy on a cooking board? And ancient posts. Grrrrrrr. I didn't cook today. Made sandwiches with Swiss cheese and turkey. Also hard boiled eggs and a relish plate that included some old timey celery stuffed with cheese. Tomato soup (canned) for those who wanted it. Had so many teens and young adults in and out of here there were no chips left. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ... > ImStillMags wrote: >> >>why is it that we get waves of trolls here at times. >>don't you people have anything better to do than >>spread your idiocy on a cooking board? > > RFC is not a cooking group anymore. It's perhaps 2% somewhat about > cooking but nothing specific or even useful. RFC is now all about > politics and personal machinations. The real reason for the influx of > nasty trolls is because the regulars here reply to them... of course > there are not many regulars here who are not trolls themselves. I > don't post much anymore because I've given up posting on topic. I plan to make pork chops tomorrow. Salt and pepper for seasoning. Also some fried apples. Not sure on the veg and other sides. Might do some Mexican rice and some of those beans that I got from HEB. I'm not into pork chops but will eat the beans and rice. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message news ![]() > On 10/5/2017 9:16 PM, cshenk wrote: >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >>> On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 18:53:44 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >>> >>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:30:26 -0500, Sqwertz >>> > >> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:21:05 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> why is it that we get waves of trolls here at times. don't you >>>>>>> people have anything better to do than spread your idiocy on a >>>>>>> cooking board? >>>>>> >>>>>> Casa Boner invited them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Speaking of nuts, I haven't had Planters Dry Roasted Peanuts for >>>>>> probably 20 years. I forgot they were pretty good (and now >>>>>> advertised as "good for you" <shrug>). A big 34.5oz jug was only >>>>>> $4.50 (after $1.50 coupon). >>>>> >>>>> Ingredients: >>>>> >>>>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >>>>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL >>> FLAVOR, >> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >>>>> MALTODEXTRIN. >>>>> >>>>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >>>>> into a science project. >>>> >>>> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >>> >>> What do you have to do if you want to buy peanuts, just peanuts? Raid >>> a peanut farm? Kidnap a peanut farmer? >> >> REad on for how to cook them. Unlike you, I post how to cook with >> recipes. >> > Peanut soup is a good idea. I seem to recall posting a recipe for that > once upon a time. Or was that Pecan soup? Either way, Bruce doesn't > cook, he just complains about the food the rest of us cook and eat. I've seen a peanut soup recipe. Here is one: http://allrecipes.com/recipe/13106/peanut-soup/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:56:48 PM UTC-4, Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 18:53:44 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: > > >Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > > > >> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:30:26 -0500, Sqwertz > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 08:21:05 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags wrote: > >> > > >> >> why is it that we get waves of trolls here at times. don't you > >> >> people have anything better to do than spread your idiocy on a > >> >> cooking board? > >> > > >> > Casa Boner invited them. > >> > > >> > Speaking of nuts, I haven't had Planters Dry Roasted Peanuts for > >> > probably 20 years. I forgot they were pretty good (and now > >> > advertised as "good for you" <shrug>). A big 34.5oz jug was only > >> > $4.50 (after $1.50 coupon). > >> > >> Ingredients: > >> > >> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES > >> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, > >> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, > >> MALTODEXTRIN. > >> > >> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned > >> into a science project. > > > >Pretty much natural stuff and spices. > > What do you have to do if you want to buy peanuts, just peanuts? Raid > a peanut farm? Kidnap a peanut farmer? You buy something besides Planter's dry roasted peanuts. Something like this: <https://www.nutstop.com/product/peanuts-roasted-salted/> You can get plain old peanuts at the grocery store. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 9:40:18 PM UTC-4, Brucy wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:26:31 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > > >On 10/5/2017 7:53 PM, cshenk wrote: > >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> > >>> > >>> Ingredients: > >>> > >>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES > >>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, > >>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, > >>> MALTODEXTRIN. > >>> > >>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned > >>> into a science project. > >> > >> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. > >> > >The peanut butter I eat contains ground peanuts and a little salt. > >nothing else. > > Great. > > >Bruce is horrified people might eat something on some bad > >for you list. I have no idea why. I like dry roasted peanuts but I > >don't have the capability to make them at home. So occasionally I buy a > >jar of them. > > What's wrong with that? > > >It's not going to kill me to occasionally snack on dry > >roasted peanuts. > > I don't think all these things necessarily kill you. It just says a > lot about the quality of the product and the producer if they need a > science project. No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their product rather than someone else's. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:29:14 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:56:48 PM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 18:53:44 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >> >> >Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> > >> >> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:30:26 -0500, Sqwertz > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Speaking of nuts, I haven't had Planters Dry Roasted Peanuts for >> >> > probably 20 years. I forgot they were pretty good (and now >> >> > advertised as "good for you" <shrug>). A big 34.5oz jug was only >> >> > $4.50 (after $1.50 coupon). >> >> >> >> Ingredients: >> >> >> >> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >> >> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, >> >> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >> >> MALTODEXTRIN. >> >> >> >> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >> >> into a science project. >> > >> >Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >> >> What do you have to do if you want to buy peanuts, just peanuts? Raid >> a peanut farm? Kidnap a peanut farmer? > >You buy something besides Planter's dry roasted peanuts. Something like this: > ><https://www.nutstop.com/product/peanuts-roasted-salted/> > >You can get plain old peanuts at the grocery store. Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for Supermarket Steve of course. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 9:40:18 PM UTC-4, Brucy wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:26:31 -0400, jmcquown > >> wrote: >> >> >On 10/5/2017 7:53 PM, cshenk wrote: >> >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >> >> >>> >> >>> Ingredients: >> >>> >> >>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >> >>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, >> >>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >> >>> MALTODEXTRIN. >> >>> >> >>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >> >>> into a science project. >> >> >> >> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >> >> >> >The peanut butter I eat contains ground peanuts and a little salt. >> >nothing else. >> >> Great. >> >> >Bruce is horrified people might eat something on some bad >> >for you list. I have no idea why. I like dry roasted peanuts but I >> >don't have the capability to make them at home. So occasionally I buy a >> >jar of them. >> >> What's wrong with that? >> >> >It's not going to kill me to occasionally snack on dry >> >roasted peanuts. >> >> I don't think all these things necessarily kill you. It just says a >> lot about the quality of the product and the producer if they need a >> science project. > >No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >product rather than someone else's. How sad is that, bimbo? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
l not -l wrote:
> > To me, the worst thing about TJs is <snip> I've gone to TJs twice for things that were highly recommended as the best ever. Both were fails. Not bad but certainly not worth the extra trip. For me, the only good thing good about TJs is that they are right next door to "5-Below" store. I love that store! Also a Petsmart is only one store down from that. > Breakfast will be a western omelet with two pieces of toasted and > buttered TJs Sprouted 9 Grain Bread; at least one slice of which > will be further enhanced with home-made apple butter. Sounds nice. Question though, what do you call a western omelet? Just curious. I'm actually planning a 'breakfast for late lunch' today. This will consist of one microwaved potato with butter. 2 sausage links with a slight drizzle of maple syrup. 3 fried eggs over easy. Two slices of seeded rye bread with 1/2 slice enhanced with orange marmalade. (the dessert piece) A fully deluxe meal would also add a stack of thin pancakes but I rarely to that. Probably won't today. Anyway, once I eat all that, I'll turn lazy as hell for awhile. It's a very full meal and will certainly put you down in a nice way. ;-D |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
> > Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their > >product rather than someone else's. > > How sad is that, bimbo? You didn't have to add that last word - name calling again. Bruce, I suspect that when an ingredient list says "natural ingredients," that's probably the company's secret ingredients which they are allowed to hide from copycat people. Are you really all that paranoid about what you buy and eat? Also, do you eat as well as you preach? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> > I plan to make pork chops tomorrow. Salt and pepper for seasoning. Also some > fried apples. Not sure on the veg and other sides. Might do some Mexican > rice and some of those beans that I got from HEB. I'm not into pork chops > but will eat the beans and rice. Ya know Julie...I've always wondered about many of your cooking posts. How can you possibly cook well for others when you don't even like what you are cooking? When I cook, I'll taste occasionally and adjust ingredients but if you don't like it to start with - that almost sounds like a guaranteed fail to me. One more thing. If you are cooking pork chops, try deglazing the pan with a tiny bit of water and some butter and cooking fried pears instead. Pears go very well with pork. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
l not -l wrote:
> > Gary wrote: > > Sounds nice. Question though, what do you call a western > > omelet? > Folded, rather than rolled, omelet, filled with diced ham, onion > and bell pepper. Green bell pepper seems to be traditional; > however, I had a yellow bell pepper remnant that I diced and > used. Cheese is optional; I draped my omelet in a very thin > slice of Land o' Lakes Sharp Cheddar/American Blend. Very thin > in this case means I had the deli slice my cheese about half as > thick as pre-packaged slices; less than a half-ounce. This is a > very good cheese and doesn't take a lot to add good flavor. Not too long ago, I quit the omlet method and just went with scrambled eggs using omlet ingredients. I'll use eggs, cheese, onion and bell pepper and a bit of chopped tomato too. I've never added meat but I do like some sausage on the side with a drizzle of maple syrup. Anyway, thanks for the description of "western." I thought it might include hot peppers ala stevers. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 6:52:43 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > > >On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 9:40:18 PM UTC-4, Brucy wrote: > >> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:26:31 -0400, jmcquown > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >On 10/5/2017 7:53 PM, cshenk wrote: > >> >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: > >> >> > >> >>> > >> >>> Ingredients: > >> >>> > >> >>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES > >> >>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, > >> >>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, > >> >>> MALTODEXTRIN. > >> >>> > >> >>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned > >> >>> into a science project. > >> >> > >> >> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. > >> >> > >> >The peanut butter I eat contains ground peanuts and a little salt. > >> >nothing else. > >> > >> Great. > >> > >> >Bruce is horrified people might eat something on some bad > >> >for you list. I have no idea why. I like dry roasted peanuts but I > >> >don't have the capability to make them at home. So occasionally I buy a > >> >jar of them. > >> > >> What's wrong with that? > >> > >> >It's not going to kill me to occasionally snack on dry > >> >roasted peanuts. > >> > >> I don't think all these things necessarily kill you. It just says a > >> lot about the quality of the product and the producer if they need a > >> science project. > > > >No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their > >product rather than someone else's. > > How sad is that, bimbo? I'm sorry I called you dummy. It was a childish reaction to your posing questions to which you would know the answer if you gave it a minute's thought. Unless that's your version of the Socratic Method, and you think that by posing those questions we will learn something we do not already know. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-06 9:46 AM, Gary wrote:
> l not -l wrote: > Not too long ago, I quit the omlet method and just went with > scrambled eggs using omlet ingredients. I'll use eggs, cheese, > onion and bell pepper and a bit of chopped tomato too. I've never > added meat but I do like some sausage on the side with a drizzle > of maple syrup. I have never been crazy about omelets. While my favourite style of egg is probably poached, I also like them fried, sunny side if I can manage to get the tops just cooked without over cooking the bottoms. I also like them gently scrambled. I like eggs barely cooked and I think the problem with omelets is that they usually end up a little browned, and that taste turns me right off. > > Anyway, thanks for the description of "western." I thought it > might include hot peppers ala stevers. > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/5/2017 10:53 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:29:33 -0600, Casa lo pensa > > wrote: > >> On 10/5/2017 10:25 PM, Bruce wrote: > >>> But Sqwerts the stalker is you, right? >> >> I dunno, ya think? > > I axed ya. Byte me, ****. >>> So that leaves you and your forger (Sqwertz?) >> >> Sqwerty is the forger? >> >> Do tell! > > Just my guess. Not a bad one either. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 4:52 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:29:14 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > >> On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 7:56:48 PM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: >>> On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 18:53:44 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote: >>> >>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 13:30:26 -0500, Sqwertz > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Speaking of nuts, I haven't had Planters Dry Roasted Peanuts for >>>>>> probably 20 years. I forgot they were pretty good (and now >>>>>> advertised as "good for you" <shrug>). A big 34.5oz jug was only >>>>>> $4.50 (after $1.50 coupon). >>>>> >>>>> Ingredients: >>>>> >>>>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >>>>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, >>>>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >>>>> MALTODEXTRIN. >>>>> >>>>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >>>>> into a science project. >>>> >>>> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >>> >>> What do you have to do if you want to buy peanuts, just peanuts? Raid >>> a peanut farm? Kidnap a peanut farmer? >> >> You buy something besides Planter's dry roasted peanuts. Something like this: >> >> <https://www.nutstop.com/product/peanuts-roasted-salted/> >> >> You can get plain old peanuts at the grocery store. > > Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for > Supermarket Steve of course. > Your need to control the mass decisions of others bespeaks a mania untreated if not undiagnosed. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 4:52 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >> product rather than someone else's. > How sad is that, bimbo? Wow, so the minute she disagrees with you she becomes a "bimbo"??? So telling, troll. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 6:07 AM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote: >> >> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>> No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >>> product rather than someone else's. >> >> How sad is that, bimbo? > > You didn't have to add that last word - name calling again. GOOD catch sir... > Bruce, I suspect that when an ingredient list says "natural > ingredients," that's probably the company's secret ingredients > which they are allowed to hide from copycat people. > > Are you really all that paranoid about what you buy and eat? > Also, do you eat as well as you preach? But really...who cares, and moreover who would be able to verify the claims of a lying troll. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 8:04 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 6:52:43 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton >> > wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 9:40:18 PM UTC-4, Brucy wrote: >>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:26:31 -0400, jmcquown > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 10/5/2017 7:53 PM, cshenk wrote: >>>>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ingredients: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >>>>>>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, >>>>>>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >>>>>>> MALTODEXTRIN. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >>>>>>> into a science project. >>>>>> >>>>>> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >>>>>> >>>>> The peanut butter I eat contains ground peanuts and a little salt. >>>>> nothing else. >>>> >>>> Great. >>>> >>>>> Bruce is horrified people might eat something on some bad >>>>> for you list. I have no idea why. I like dry roasted peanuts but I >>>>> don't have the capability to make them at home. So occasionally I buy a >>>>> jar of them. >>>> >>>> What's wrong with that? >>>> >>>>> It's not going to kill me to occasionally snack on dry >>>>> roasted peanuts. >>>> >>>> I don't think all these things necessarily kill you. It just says a >>>> lot about the quality of the product and the producer if they need a >>>> science project. >>> >>> No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >>> product rather than someone else's. >> >> How sad is that, bimbo? > > I'm sorry I called you dummy. It was a childish reaction to your > posing questions to which you would know the answer if you gave > it a minute's thought. Unless that's your version of the Socratic > Method, and you think that by posing those questions we will learn > something we do not already know. > > Cindy Hamilton > Whoa...Big oLd over-analysis! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 8:38 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> I like eggs barely cooked and I think the problem with omelets is that > they usually end up a little browned, and that taste turns me right off. > Try the ATK version: https://www.americastestkitchen.com/...french-omelets http://www.seriouseats.com/2010/07/t...he-perfec.html America's Test Kitchen spent weeks cracking eggs to simplify this recipe. Its final recipe for Perfect French Omelets defies 100 years of French culinary tradition. They rely on frozen butter, chopsticks (for stirring the eggs as they cook), the skillet lid (to trap residual heat and finish cooking the eggs), and a paper towel (to facilitate neatly rolling the omelet). Yes, the method sounds weird, but it really works. Watch the video for step-by-step instructions or get the recipe at America's Test Kitchen (free registration required) » |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 08:07:44 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Bruce wrote: >> >> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >> >No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >> >product rather than someone else's. >> >> How sad is that, bimbo? > >You didn't have to add that last word - name calling again. Are you blind? I did that in reply to her "dummy". Of course she's not a bimbo. >Bruce, I suspect that when an ingredient list says "natural >ingredients," that's probably the company's secret ingredients >which they are allowed to hide from copycat people. Yes. >Are you really all that paranoid about what you buy and eat? No. >Also, do you eat as well as you preach? No. Besides, I don't preach, I inform. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 6:52:43 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton >> > wrote: >> >> >On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 9:40:18 PM UTC-4, Brucy wrote: >> >> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:26:31 -0400, jmcquown > >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >On 10/5/2017 7:53 PM, cshenk wrote: >> >> >> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> Ingredients: >> >> >>> >> >> >>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >> >> >>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, >> >> >>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >> >> >>> MALTODEXTRIN. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >> >> >>> into a science project. >> >> >> >> >> >> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >> >> >> >> >> >The peanut butter I eat contains ground peanuts and a little salt. >> >> >nothing else. >> >> >> >> Great. >> >> >> >> >Bruce is horrified people might eat something on some bad >> >> >for you list. I have no idea why. I like dry roasted peanuts but I >> >> >don't have the capability to make them at home. So occasionally I buy a >> >> >jar of them. >> >> >> >> What's wrong with that? >> >> >> >> >It's not going to kill me to occasionally snack on dry >> >> >roasted peanuts. >> >> >> >> I don't think all these things necessarily kill you. It just says a >> >> lot about the quality of the product and the producer if they need a >> >> science project. >> > >> >No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >> >product rather than someone else's. >> >> How sad is that, bimbo? > >I'm sorry I called you dummy. That's ok. I shouldn't have called you a bimbo either ![]() >It was a childish reaction to your >posing questions to which you would know the answer if you gave >it a minute's thought. Unless that's your version of the Socratic >Method, and you think that by posing those questions we will learn >something we do not already know. You mean when I asked "What's wrong with that?" I only meant to say there was nothing wrong with what Jill said. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message
news ![]() > On 10/6/2017 4:52 AM, Bruce wrote: >> Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for >> Supermarket Steve of course. >> > > Your need to control the mass decisions of others bespeaks a mania > untreated if not undiagnosed. And mostly unread as well. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 10:00 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Oct 2017 08:07:44 -0400, Gary > wrote: > >> Bruce wrote: >>> >>> Cindy Hamilton wrote: >>>> No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >>>> product rather than someone else's. >>> >>> How sad is that, bimbo? >> >> You didn't have to add that last word - name calling again. > > Are you blind? I did that in reply to her "dummy". Of course she's not > a bimbo. Wow, you have the payback mentality of a child. > >> Bruce, I suspect that when an ingredient list says "natural >> ingredients," that's probably the company's secret ingredients >> which they are allowed to hide from copycat people. > > Yes. > >> Are you really all that paranoid about what you buy and eat? > > No. > >> Also, do you eat as well as you preach? > > No. Besides, I don't preach, I inform. Liar, your ingredient mania is every bit of preachy. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 10:03 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 07:04:57 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > >> On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 6:52:43 AM UTC-4, Bruce wrote: >>> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 03:31:35 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Thursday, October 5, 2017 at 9:40:18 PM UTC-4, Brucy wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 21:26:31 -0400, jmcquown > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 10/5/2017 7:53 PM, cshenk wrote: >>>>>>> Bruce wrote in rec.food.cooking: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Ingredients: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> INGREDIENTS: PEANUTS, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF: SEA SALT, SPICES >>>>>>>> (CONTAINS CELERY), DRIED ONION, DRIED GARLIC, PAPRIKA, NATURAL FLAVOR, >>>>>>>> SUGAR, GELATIN, TORULA YEAST, CORNSTARCH, DRIED CORN SYRUP, >>>>>>>> MALTODEXTRIN. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What's wrong with just peanuts? No, even peanuts have to be turned >>>>>>>> into a science project. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pretty much natural stuff and spices. >>>>>>> >>>>>> The peanut butter I eat contains ground peanuts and a little salt. >>>>>> nothing else. >>>>> >>>>> Great. >>>>> >>>>>> Bruce is horrified people might eat something on some bad >>>>>> for you list. I have no idea why. I like dry roasted peanuts but I >>>>>> don't have the capability to make them at home. So occasionally I buy a >>>>>> jar of them. >>>>> >>>>> What's wrong with that? >>>>> >>>>>> It's not going to kill me to occasionally snack on dry >>>>>> roasted peanuts. >>>>> >>>>> I don't think all these things necessarily kill you. It just says a >>>>> lot about the quality of the product and the producer if they need a >>>>> science project. >>>> >>>> No, dummy. It's about amping up the flavor so people will buy their >>>> product rather than someone else's. >>> >>> How sad is that, bimbo? >> >> I'm sorry I called you dummy. > > That's ok. I shouldn't have called you a bimbo either ![]() Oh this is truly NAUSEATING! You miserable nancy boy suckup. >> It was a childish reaction to your >> posing questions to which you would know the answer if you gave >> it a minute's thought. Unless that's your version of the Socratic >> Method, and you think that by posing those questions we will learn >> something we do not already know. > > You mean when I asked "What's wrong with that?" I only meant to say > there was nothing wrong with what Jill said. Oh shut up and go away! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 10:05 AM, Cheri wrote:
> "Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> On 10/6/2017 4:52 AM, Bruce wrote: > >>> Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for >>> Supermarket Steve of course. >>> >> >> Your need to control the mass decisions of others bespeaks a mania >> untreated if not undiagnosed. > > > And mostly unread as well. > > Cheri Well one would _hope_ so! Alas...rfc dullards, etc... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-06, l not -l > wrote:
> the just starting to sizzle butter and cover with a Volrath > stainless steel plate cover (vent hole in center). The steam > coming off the butter cooks the top of the eggs. Interesting technique. I may try it. I assume you are talking about pan fried eggs, sunny-side up, yes, no? ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message
news ![]() > On 10/6/2017 10:05 AM, Cheri wrote: >> "Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >>> On 10/6/2017 4:52 AM, Bruce wrote: >> >>>> Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for >>>> Supermarket Steve of course. >>>> >>> >>> Your need to control the mass decisions of others bespeaks a mania >>> untreated if not undiagnosed. >> >> >> And mostly unread as well. >> >> Cheri > > Well one would _hope_ so! > > Alas...rfc dullards, etc... As soon as I see that there is an ingredient list, it's buh-bye. If I want ingredient lists, I will read them myself. ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:42:54 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote: >"Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message >news ![]() >> On 10/6/2017 10:05 AM, Cheri wrote: >>> "Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message >>> news ![]() >>> >>>>> Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for >>>>> Supermarket Steve of course. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Your need to control the mass decisions of others bespeaks a mania >>>> untreated if not undiagnosed. >>> >>> >>> And mostly unread as well. >>> >>> Cheri >> >> Well one would _hope_ so! >> >> Alas...rfc dullards, etc... > > >As soon as I see that there is an ingredient list, it's buh-bye. If I want >ingredient lists, I will read them myself. ![]() Strange how people react to ingredients. In a cooking group of all places. Like a child that puts its fingers in its ears and keeps yelling "I don't want to know, I don't want to know!" Unfortunately, these are adults ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 11:09 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 09:42:54 -0700, "Cheri" > > wrote: > >> "Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >>> On 10/6/2017 10:05 AM, Cheri wrote: >>>> "Casa lo pensa" > wrote in message >>>> news ![]() >>>> >>>>>> Alright then. I hope nobody buys the Planters gunk, except for >>>>>> Supermarket Steve of course. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Your need to control the mass decisions of others bespeaks a mania >>>>> untreated if not undiagnosed. >>>> >>>> >>>> And mostly unread as well. >>>> >>>> Cheri >>> >>> Well one would _hope_ so! >>> >>> Alas...rfc dullards, etc... >> >> >> As soon as I see that there is an ingredient list, it's buh-bye. If I want >> ingredient lists, I will read them myself. ![]() > > Strange how people react to ingredients. When they're NOT part of a recipe..mmm.... > In a cooking group of all. > places. Where people expect RECIPES, not ingredient chastisement. > Like a child that puts its fingers in its ears and keeps > yelling "I don't want to know, I don't want to know!" Like a child who repeats the same tired phrase time and again, you are. > Unfortunately, these are adults ![]() Basically senior children who tend to enhance their born-as traits over the years. Which means you must have been a real shit child. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:16:07 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote: >Which means you must have been a real shit child. Hey Boner, your mental health facility called. They want you back: <http://mental-health-facilities.healthgrove.com/l/10524/University-of-New-Mexico-Hospital-Assertive-Community-Treatment-ACT> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 7:09:59 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > Strange how people react to ingredients. In a cooking group of all > places. Like a child that puts its fingers in its ears and keeps > yelling "I don't want to know, I don't want to know!" > > Unfortunately, these are adults ![]() You should educate yourself as to what these ingredients are. So they have really long, strange-sounding, names. That's not a big deal - you should hear all the long, strange-sounding, names the human body produces. Deoxyribonucleic acid for one - there's many more. I don't have any problem with flavor enhancers, emulsifiers, stabilizers, preservatives, acidifiers, or sweeteners. What I want to know is when food contains stuff like salivary glands or lymph nodes. Now that's the kind of stuff I'd like to avoid. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:30:52 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote: >On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 7:09:59 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >> >> Strange how people react to ingredients. In a cooking group of all >> places. Like a child that puts its fingers in its ears and keeps >> yelling "I don't want to know, I don't want to know!" >> >> Unfortunately, these are adults ![]() > >You should educate yourself as to what these ingredients are. So they have really long, strange-sounding, names. That's not a big deal - you should hear all the long, strange-sounding, names the human body produces. Deoxyribonucleic acid for one - there's many more. > >I don't have any problem with flavor enhancers, emulsifiers, stabilizers, preservatives, acidifiers, or sweeteners. What I want to know is when food contains stuff like salivary glands or lymph nodes. Now that's the kind of stuff I'd like to avoid. I know that not everything is evil or bad for you. Although some of it is and some of it will turn out to be in 10 years time. But the point is that if they need flavour enhancers, for instance, that means the product sucks. That doesn't mean I'll call the police if you buy it. And sometimes I buy it too if I'm in a hurry. But it can never hurt to know. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 11:26 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 11:16:07 -0600, Casa lo pensa > > wrote: > >> Which means you must have been a real shit child. > > Hey Boner, your mental health facility called. They want you back: > > <http://mental-health-facilities.healthgrove.com/l/10524/University-of-New-Mexico-Hospital-Assertive-Community-Treatment-ACT> Hey Bwuthie, funny how the tables have turned, innit? You _used to_ have a coterie of fawning females who thought you were witty, albeit in a snide way. Now it's devolved to a precious few who even now merely tolerate you. I mean you have REALLY decimated your favorability ratings with the graceless false candor of a common retail politician. Nice work, bro... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 11:30 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 7:09:59 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >> >> Strange how people react to ingredients. In a cooking group of all >> places. Like a child that puts its fingers in its ears and keeps >> yelling "I don't want to know, I don't want to know!" >> >> Unfortunately, these are adults ![]() > > You should educate yourself as to what these ingredients are. So they have really long, strange-sounding, names. That's not a big deal - you should hear all the long, strange-sounding, names the human body produces. Deoxyribonucleic acid for one - there's many more. > > I don't have any problem with flavor enhancers, emulsifiers, stabilizers, preservatives, acidifiers, or sweeteners. What I want to know is when food contains stuff like salivary glands or lymph nodes. Now that's the kind of stuff I'd like to avoid. > I avoid most organ meats for similar reasons. Concentration of toxins makes for poor nutritive long term consumption choices. Imo... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/6/2017 11:34 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 10:30:52 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 7:09:59 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote: >>> >>> Strange how people react to ingredients. In a cooking group of all >>> places. Like a child that puts its fingers in its ears and keeps >>> yelling "I don't want to know, I don't want to know!" >>> >>> Unfortunately, these are adults ![]() >> >> You should educate yourself as to what these ingredients are. So they have really long, strange-sounding, names. That's not a big deal - you should hear all the long, strange-sounding, names the human body produces. Deoxyribonucleic acid for one - there's many more. >> >> I don't have any problem with flavor enhancers, emulsifiers, stabilizers, preservatives, acidifiers, or sweeteners. What I want to know is when food contains stuff like salivary glands or lymph nodes. Now that's the kind of stuff I'd like to avoid. > > I know that not everything is evil or bad for you. Although some of it > is and some of it will turn out to be in 10 years time. OMG, the futurist rationalization... > But the point is that if they need flavour enhancers, for instance, > that means the product sucks. No, it does NOT! Lays, for example, makes flavored and non-flavored potato chips. http://www.fritolay.com/snacks/product-page/lays Aside from the ingredients to flavor they are largely identical chips. http://www.fritolay.com/snacks/produ...d-potato-chips So the product does not "suck", you asshole! > That doesn't mean I'll call the police if you buy it. And sometimes I > buy it too if I'm in a hurry. But it can never hurt to know. Here's a cluebat to the melon for you, ya raving control freak....most folks here can READ LABELS! Really! Now **** OFF AND DIE! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Back to School - Cooking School That Is | General Cooking | |||
School uniform | General Cooking | |||
summer cooking/baking school for high school student? | General Cooking | |||
School Uniforms | General Cooking | |||
BBQ School | Barbecue |