On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:19:44 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote:

>On 10/22/2017 6:11 PM, wrote:
>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:56:21 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 10/22/2017 2:48 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> The ingredients are probably
>>>
>>>
>>> ****
>>>
>>> OFF
>>
>> Didja know that those who use that expression are incapable.
>>
>
>Nope, sorry, never heard that one.

I should have added "they just don't know it."

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>> > we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>> > where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>> > certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>> > between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>> > on this planet.
>> > Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>> > dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>> >
>>
>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>> partner or conquest.
>>
>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>
>Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
spouse. . . you go, Cindy.

On 10/23/2017 9:25 AM, wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:19:44 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/22/2017 6:11 PM, wrote:
>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:56:21 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/22/2017 2:48 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> The ingredients are probably
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ****
>>>>
>>>> OFF
>>>
>>> Didja know that those who use that expression are incapable.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, sorry, never heard that one.
>
> I should have added "they just don't know it."
>
Before or after you demonstrated as much for us?

On 10/23/2017 9:28 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>> on this planet.
>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>
>>>
>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>> partner or conquest.
>>>
>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>
>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>

Why is this in a cooking group?

On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 11:28:04 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
> >> > we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
> >> > where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
> >> > certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
> >> > between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
> >> > on this planet.
> >> > Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
> >> > dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
> >> >
> >>
> >> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
> >> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
> >> partner or conquest.
> >>
> >> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
> >> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
> >> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
> >> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
> >
> >Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
> >
> >Cindy Hamilton
>
> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.

No. I'm stating that

"we both know with absolute certainty that there is no such thing
as platonic relationships between people of the opposite sex, no
way, no how, not possible, not on this planet"

is simply wrong. There are millions of platonic friendships
between members of the opposite sex.

Cindy Hamilton

On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>> on this planet.
>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>
>>>
>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>> partner or conquest.
>>>
>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>
>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>
She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
That's simply not true.

Jill

On 10/23/2017 10:40 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>
> She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse.Â* The point is not everyone
> does.Â* You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
> someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them. That's
> simply not true.
>
> Jill


Is he still calling you on the phone of late?

I think your rejection was unwelcome...perhaps...

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:35:28 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote:

>On 10/23/2017 9:28 AM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>
>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>
>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>
>
>Why is this in a cooking group?

Better question... why are you in a cooking group?

On 10/23/2017 11:09 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:35:28 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2017 9:28 AM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>>
>>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>>
>>
>> Why is this in a cooking group?
>
> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>

Cuz I get killer Asian recipes from dsi!.

Otherwise...

Feh.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>
>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>
>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>
>She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
>does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>That's simply not true.

Not right away but given some time it is true. No one dates someone
of the opposite sex without their spouse along only to discuss hockey
scores. Even most single people of the opposite sex may date several
times before one makes the first move. You're either very naive,
think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
your faithfulness. If you're dating some guy without your husband
along and claiming you aren't doing something sexual with him you are
lying.

On 10/23/2017 11:33 AM, wrote:
> You're either very naive,
> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
> your faithfulness.


Uh why do you care ?

Is this because she stopped taking your phone calls?

Does your wife know you were calling her all the time?

I mean in terms of being "convincing"...well...uh...

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>
>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>
>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>
>She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
>does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>That's simply not true.
>
>Jill

You can't talk... you're sleeping with someone's husband... and each
time he visits you he probably tells his wife he's attending an art
show... there's no way you can convince me that he spends the week
with you only for your cooking.

On 10/23/2017 11:40 AM, wrote:
>> You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>> someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>> That's simply not true.
>>
>> Jill
> You can't talk... you're sleeping with someone's husband... and each
> time he visits you he probably tells his wife he's attending an art
> show... there's no way you can convince me that he spends the week
> with you only for your cooking.

Uh why do you care ?

Is this because she stopped taking your phone calls?

Does your wife know you were calling her all the time?

I mean in terms of being "convincing"...well...uh...

"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 11:28:04 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> >> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>> >> > we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>> >> > where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>> >> > certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>> >> > between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible,
>> >> > not
>> >> > on this planet.
>> >> > Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>> >> > dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It
>> >> is
>> >> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>> >> partner or conquest.
>> >>
>> >> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>> >> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances.
>> >> Even
>> >> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>> >> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>> >
>> >Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>> >
>> >Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>
> No. I'm stating that
>
> "we both know with absolute certainty that there is no such thing
> as platonic relationships between people of the opposite sex, no
> way, no how, not possible, not on this planet"
>
> is simply wrong. There are millions of platonic friendships
> between members of the opposite sex.
>
> Cindy Hamilton


It wasn't so long ago that he was talking about his platonic relationship
with a woman at the market where he shops, even though he could tell she was
hot for his body (his words) he just enjoys the friendship since he and his
wife are very secure with each other. So much BS on his part at times.

Cheri

> wrote in message speaking of Casa

> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?


Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.

Cheri

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

> wrote in message speaking of Casa
>
>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>
>
>Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.

Ted Bundy talked a lot about cooking too. You'd have loved him.

jmcquown wrote:
>
> Okay, I believe you. I, personally, would not have sat there and let a
> server *glare* at me every time she came to the table. I'd have asked
> what the heck is your problem?!

For the longest time (during the meal) I was just hoping that I
was wrong and maybe imagining things. I didn't want to spoil my
daughters special birthday meal either. Only at the very end did
I realize that I was right and waitress did assume I was some old
guy dating a young girl.

You or someone here was right though....I should have announced
the dad and daughter birthday thing right as we sat down. That's
hindsight though. I never imagined that anyone would think the
wrong scenario. Oh well.

PS - my daughter did miss all that behind the scene nonsense. She
DID have a nice steak dinner and that was my only concern.


and as I said too....hopefully Miss Social Worker learned not to
prejudge or guess about people until she knew facts and not
imagination.

On 10/23/2017 12:47 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>> > wrote in message speaking of Casa
>>
>>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>>
>>
>> Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>
> Ted Bundy talked a lot about cooking too. You'd have loved him.
>

Non sequiturs largely define you, appropriately so.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:08:48 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>For the longest time (during the meal) I was just hoping that I
>was wrong and maybe imagining things. I didn't want to spoil my
>daughters special birthday meal either. Only at the very end did
>I realize that I was right and waitress did assume I was some old
>guy dating a young girl.
>
>You or someone here was right though....I should have announced
>the dad and daughter birthday thing right as we sat down. That's
>hindsight though. I never imagined that anyone would think the
>wrong scenario. Oh well.
>
>PS - my daughter did miss all that behind the scene nonsense.

Of course she missed it. It happened in your head.

>She DID have a nice steak dinner and that was my only concern.

Oh, stop it. Now I have tears in my eyes.

Bruce wrote:
>
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
> > wrote in message speaking of Casa
> >
> >> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
> >
> >
> >Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>
> Ted Bundy talked a lot about cooking too. You'd have loved him.

eh-oh ;-o ingredients?

On 10/23/2017 1:10 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:08:48 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> For the longest time (during the meal) I was just hoping that I
>> was wrong and maybe imagining things. I didn't want to spoil my
>> daughters special birthday meal either. Only at the very end did
>> I realize that I was right and waitress did assume I was some old
>> guy dating a young girl.
>>
>> You or someone here was right though....I should have announced
>> the dad and daughter birthday thing right as we sat down. That's
>> hindsight though. I never imagined that anyone would think the
>> wrong scenario. Oh well.
>>
>> PS - my daughter did miss all that behind the scene nonsense.
>
> Of course she missed it. It happened in your head.

Why are you such an irredeemable asshole, "John"?

>> She DID have a nice steak dinner and that was my only concern.
>
> Oh, stop it. Now I have tears in my eyes.

Crocodiles can really cry?

On 10/23/2017 1:11 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > wrote in message speaking of Casa
>>>
>>>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>>
>> Ted Bundy talked a lot about cooking too. You'd have loved him.
>
> eh-oh ;-o ingredients?
>

ded coeds...

On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 1:33:34 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
> >On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
> >>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
> >>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
> >>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
> >>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
> >>>>> on this planet.
> >>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
> >>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
> >>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
> >>>> partner or conquest.
> >>>>
> >>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
> >>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
> >>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
> >>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
> >>>
> >>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
> >>>
> >>> Cindy Hamilton
> >>
> >> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
> >> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
> >>
> >She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
> >does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
> >someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
> >That's simply not true.
>
> Not right away but given some time it is true. No one dates someone
> of the opposite sex without their spouse along only to discuss hockey
> scores. Even most single people of the opposite sex may date several
> times before one makes the first move. You're either very naive,
> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
> your faithfulness. If you're dating some guy without your husband
> along and claiming you aren't doing something sexual with him you are
> lying.

When has this been about dating? If I have lunch with a friend
who's male, does that make it a date? It's socializing, but
it's definitely not a date.

Cindy Hamilton

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:36:29 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote:

>On 10/23/2017 11:33 AM, penmart01 wrote:
>> You're either very naive,
>> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
>> your faithfulness.
>
>Uh why do you care ?
>Is this because she stopped taking your phone calls?
>Does your wife know you were calling her all the time?
>I mean in terms of being "convincing"...well...uh...

I've never spoken to Cindy, I've no idea what she looks like... I
merely answered her question... to be perfectly honest I've no idea if
she's who she claims she is... no different than you.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:41:48 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote:

>On 10/23/2017 11:40 AM, wrote:
>>> You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>>> someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>>> That's simply not true.
>>>
>>> Jill
>> You can't talk... you're sleeping with someone's husband... and each
>> time he visits you he probably tells his wife he's attending an art
>> show... there's no way you can convince me that he spends the week
>> with you only for your cooking.
>
>Uh why do you care ?

I don't care a whit, merely addressed her post to me

>Is this because she stopped taking your phone calls?

How do you know whether the phone calls stopped?

>Does your wife know you were calling her all the time?
>I mean in terms of being "convincing"...well...uh...

Most times my wife was within earshot of my speaker phone... there was
never a time the conversation was untorrid, mostly about Jill
searching for a job and her doing repairs on her house.

On 10/23/2017 1:32 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:36:29 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2017 11:33 AM, penmart01 wrote:
>>> You're either very naive,
>>> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
>>> your faithfulness.
>>
>> Uh why do you care ?
>> Is this because she stopped taking your phone calls?
>> Does your wife know you were calling her all the time?
>> I mean in terms of being "convincing"...well...uh...
>
> I've never spoken to Cindy, I've no idea what she looks like...

Nor have I, but to be accurate your reply was to Jill, whom you used to
telephone, as she tells it anyway.

> I merely answered her question...

Jill's that is, not Cindy's.

So my question still stands"

Is this because she stopped taking your phone calls?

> to be perfectly honest I've no idea if
> she's who she claims she is... no different than you.

I am ME, but you are merely YOU!

Which ought to settle everything for everyone here, yes?

;-)

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:11:13 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
>> On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 11:28:04 AM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> >> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>> >> > we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>> >> > where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>> >> > certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>> >> > between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible,
>>> >> > not
>>> >> > on this planet.
>>> >> > Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>> >> > dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It
>>> >> is
>>> >> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>> >> partner or conquest.
>>> >>
>>> >> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>> >> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances.
>>> >> Even
>>> >> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>> >> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>> >
>>> >Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>> >
>>> >Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>
>> No. I'm stating that
>>
>> "we both know with absolute certainty that there is no such thing
>> as platonic relationships between people of the opposite sex, no
>> way, no how, not possible, not on this planet"
>>
>> is simply wrong. There are millions of platonic friendships
>> between members of the opposite sex.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
>It wasn't so long ago that he was talking about his platonic relationship
>with a woman at the market where he shops,

There was no relationship, platonic or otherwise. Yes, we spoke for
under five minutes like three times, she no longer works there, hasn't
for over a year. I converse with several employees there, women and
men... all out in front of everyone.

>even though he could tell she was hot for his body (his words)

Now you are lying... I never said any such thing, she's young enough
to be my grand daughter... no 30 year old women would be hot for the
body of a 75 year old man. Mostly we spoke because she knows my wife
from parent teachers day and she's had her kids in her classes. We
were going to arrange for her oldest son to do some odd jobs but it
never came to be... very few of the teens around here are willing to
do hard dirty work.
Living here there's no way either of us could fool around, not with
my wife knowing every parent in town and everyone in town knowing
us... small town living doesn't allow for private trysts.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

> wrote in message speaking of Casa
>
>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>
>
>Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>
>Cheri

I've yet to see anything about cooking from casa, come to think of it
I've not seen anything about cooking from you.

On 10/23/2017 2:13 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>> > wrote in message speaking of Casa
>>
>>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>>
>>
>> Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I've yet to see anything about cooking from casa,

That is a damned LIE and you ****ing KNOW it!

> come to think of it
> I've not seen anything about cooking from you.

Another lie.

I think you're losing your marbles man.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 1:33:34 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> >>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>> >>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>> >>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>> >>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>> >>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>> >>>>> on this planet.
>> >>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>> >>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>> >>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>> >>>> partner or conquest.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>> >>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>> >>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>> >>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>> >>>
>> >>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>> >>>
>> >>> Cindy Hamilton
>> >>
>> >> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>> >> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>> >>
>> >She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
>> >does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>> >someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>> >That's simply not true.
>>
>> Not right away but given some time it is true. No one dates someone
>> of the opposite sex without their spouse along only to discuss hockey
>> scores. Even most single people of the opposite sex may date several
>> times before one makes the first move. You're either very naive,
>> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
>> your faithfulness. If you're dating some guy without your husband
>> along and claiming you aren't doing something sexual with him you are
>> lying.
>
>When has this been about dating? If I have lunch with a friend
>who's male, does that make it a date? It's socializing, but
>it's definitely not a date.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

If just you two alone and not a party of coworkers then yes,
it's absolutely a date.

On 10/23/2017 2:23 PM, wrote:
>> When has this been about dating? If I have lunch with a friend
>> who's male, does that make it a date? It's socializing, but
>> it's definitely not a date.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
> If just you two alone and not a party of coworkers then yes,
> it's absolutely a date.

I call BULLSHIT!

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/date

:to make a usually romantic social arrangement to meet with :to have a
date with someone she dated in high school

https://www.thefreedictionary.com/date

a. an appointment for a particular time, esp with a person to whom one
is sexually or romantically attached: she has a dinner date.


You presuppose sexual interest or romance where NONE is necessarily
present or expected.

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 16:13:22 -0400, wrote:

>On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
>wrote:
>
> wrote in message speaking of Casa
>>
>>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>>
>>
>>Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>>
>>Cheri
>
>I've yet to see anything about cooking from casa, come to think of it
>I've not seen anything about cooking from you.

Ha!

On 10/23/2017 2:28 PM, Bruce wrote:

>> I've yet to see anything about cooking from casa, come to think of it
>> I've not seen anything about cooking from you.
>
> Ha!
>

Monosyllabic slurping is about your speed, rabbit-killer.

On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 4:23:35 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 1:33:34 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
> >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >> >>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
> >> >>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
> >> >>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
> >> >>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
> >> >>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
> >> >>>>> on this planet.
> >> >>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
> >> >>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
> >> >>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
> >> >>>> partner or conquest.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
> >> >>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
> >> >>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
> >> >>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Cindy Hamilton
> >> >>
> >> >> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
> >> >> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
> >> >>
> >> >She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
> >> >does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
> >> >someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
> >> >That's simply not true.
> >>
> >> Not right away but given some time it is true. No one dates someone
> >> of the opposite sex without their spouse along only to discuss hockey
> >> scores. Even most single people of the opposite sex may date several
> >> times before one makes the first move. You're either very naive,
> >> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
> >> your faithfulness. If you're dating some guy without your husband
> >> along and claiming you aren't doing something sexual with him you are
> >> lying.
> >
> >When has this been about dating? If I have lunch with a friend
> >who's male, does that make it a date? It's socializing, but
> >it's definitely not a date.
> >
> >Cindy Hamilton
>
> If just you two alone and not a party of coworkers then yes,
> it's absolutely a date.

And what would you call it the two times I shared an apartment
with a man without us having sex?

Cindy Hamilton

On 10/23/2017 2:43 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> If just you two alone and not a party of coworkers then yes,
>> it's absolutely a date.
> And what would you call it the two times I shared an apartment
> with a man without us having sex?
>
> Cindy Hamilton

3's Company too!

On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:20:51 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote:

>On 10/23/2017 2:13 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> > wrote in message speaking of Casa
>>>
>>>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> I've yet to see anything about cooking from casa,
>
>That is a damned LIE and you ****ing KNOW it!
>
>> come to think of it
>> I've not seen anything about cooking from you.
>
>Another lie.
>
>I think you're losing your marbles man.

I may not read every post but I've never seen a picture of anything
either of you cooked.

On 10/23/2017 3:39 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 14:20:51 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2017 2:13 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 11:13:52 -0700, "Cheri" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> > wrote in message speaking of Casa
>>>>
>>>>> Better question... why are you in a cooking group?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best answer...because he posts a lot about cooking.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> I've yet to see anything about cooking from casa,
>>
>> That is a damned LIE and you ****ing KNOW it!
>>
>>> come to think of it
>>> I've not seen anything about cooking from you.
>>
>> Another lie.
>>
>> I think you're losing your marbles man.
>
> I may not read every post but I've never seen a picture of anything
> either of you cooked.
>

That was NOT what you said!

"I've not seen anything about cooking from you."

Care to apologize now?

Or L8R?

On 10/23/2017 4:23 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 1:33:34 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>
>>>>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>>>>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>>>>
>>>> She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
>>>> does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>>>> someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>>>> That's simply not true.
>>>
>>> Not right away but given some time it is true. No one dates someone
>>> of the opposite sex without their spouse along only to discuss hockey
>>> scores. Even most single people of the opposite sex may date several
>>> times before one makes the first move. You're either very naive,
>>> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
>>> your faithfulness. If you're dating some guy without your husband
>>> along and claiming you aren't doing something sexual with him you are
>>> lying.
>>
>> When has this been about dating? If I have lunch with a friend
>> who's male, does that make it a date? It's socializing, but
>> it's definitely not a date.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> If just you two alone and not a party of coworkers then yes,
> it's absolutely a date.
>
That's bullshit.

Jill

On 10/23/2017 4:43 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 4:23:35 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:15:09 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Monday, October 23, 2017 at 1:33:34 PM UTC-4, Sheldon wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>>>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>>>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>>>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>>>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>>>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>>>>>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>>>>>
>>>>> She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
>>>>> does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>>>>> someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>>>>> That's simply not true.
>>>>
>>>> Not right away but given some time it is true. No one dates someone
>>>> of the opposite sex without their spouse along only to discuss hockey
>>>> scores. Even most single people of the opposite sex may date several
>>>> times before one makes the first move. You're either very naive,
>>>> think I'm very naive, or you are attempting mightily to convince us of
>>>> your faithfulness. If you're dating some guy without your husband
>>>> along and claiming you aren't doing something sexual with him you are
>>>> lying.
>>>
>>> When has this been about dating? If I have lunch with a friend
>>> who's male, does that make it a date? It's socializing, but
>>> it's definitely not a date.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> If just you two alone and not a party of coworkers then yes,
>> it's absolutely a date.
>
> And what would you call it the two times I shared an apartment
> with a man without us having sex?
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
Roommates.

Jill

On 10/23/2017 1:40 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 12:40:56 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/23/2017 11:28 AM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 03:15:42 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 9:02:33 PM UTC-4, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:09 PM, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyways, we don't socialize alone with people of the opposite sex...
>>>>>> we've both been around the block several times and we know very well
>>>>>> where that kind of behaviour leads... we both know with absolute
>>>>>> certainty that there is no such thing as platonic relationships
>>>>>> between people of the opposite sex, no way, no how, not possible, not
>>>>>> on this planet.
>>>>>> Anytime someone tries to convince us that they are only going out to
>>>>>> dinner and to see a show without their spouse LOUD sirens go off.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> While I agree it happens often, it does not happen all the time. It is
>>>>> possible to spend time with a person as a friend, not a potential bed
>>>>> partner or conquest.
>>>>>
>>>>> Over the years I had quite a few women ask me to escort them to an
>>>>> event. They knew they would get home safely and with no advances. Even
>>>>> before I was married I had a female co-worker riding back and forth to
>>>>> work with me. She gave me gas money every payday.
>>>>
>>>> Sheldon projects his own psychopathology onto everyone else.
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> So you are attempting to convince us that no one cheats on their
>>> spouse. . . you go, Cindy.
>>>
>> She didn't say no one cheats on their spouse. The point is not everyone
>> does. You seem to think everyone who has any sort of interaction with
>> someone of the opposite sex is bound to wind up in bed with them.
>> That's simply not true.
>>
>> Jill
>
> You can't talk... you're sleeping with someone's husband... and each
> time he visits you he probably tells his wife he's attending an art
> show... there's no way you can convince me that he spends the week
> with you only for your cooking.
>
You're full of crap.

Jill