Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither
my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went ahead and invited her. Nope. No way. Not happening. I am in the dog house. Plans have changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not coming to my house.... not this weekend, or any time in the future. I am in deep shit over it, but I should be able to sleep well, not having to worry about someone sneaking through the pantry and helping herself to everything her little heart desires. There is a line in the sand. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but she is not to be invited to come on her own. I hope you are all happy. I have probably been cut off for a while, but... it's worth it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 19:44:52 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She >invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I >would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went >ahead and invited her. > > Nope. No way. Not happening. I am in the dog house. Plans have >changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken >to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not >coming to my house.... not this weekend, or any time in the future. > > >I am in deep shit over it, but I should be able to sleep well, not >having to worry about someone sneaking through the pantry and helping >herself to everything her little heart desires. There is a line in the >sand. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but >she is not to be invited to come on her own. I hope you are all happy. I >have probably been cut off for a while, but... it's worth it. I fail to understand, what does it matter if she helps herself to everything her little heart desires?? It's clearly not something in her control. Have a little empathy, your wife might like you better. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 8:05 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She >> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. > > Why would she need to consult you about inviting BN to the church > dinner, as you wouldn't be there anyway? > > Janet UK > Exactly. His wife didn't invite her niece to spend the night with them. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 7:44 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither > my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church > events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day.Â* She > invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I > would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went > ahead and invited her. > Is the dinner an all you can eat deal? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-22 8:05 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She >> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. > > Why would she need to consult you about inviting BN to the church > dinner, as you wouldn't be there anyway? The reason is that she doesn't live around here and would presumably be driven down by her husband, who I would be expected to entertain. They consider coming down here a weekend in the country and would expect to stay overnight. After my previous experiences with her, I don't want her in my house. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-22 8:25 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 7:52 PM, wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 19:44:52 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> I fail to understand, what does it matter if she helps herself to >> everything her little heart desires??Â* It's clearly not something in >> her control.Â* Have a little empathy, your wife might like you better. >> > No one is required to indulge obsessive eating habits.Â* However, this is > a church dinner.Â* His wife invited her.Â* Since he doesn't do church > events anyway, why should she have a problem with him not attending this > time? > Not a problem if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and they would expect to spend the night here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-22 8:30 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 7:44 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day.Â* She >> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I >> would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she >> went ahead and invited her. >> > > Is the dinner an all you can eat deal? I have no idea. I told my wife to warn the church people providing the dinner that they will need to prepare twice as much food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-10-22 8:25 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> On 10/22/2017 7:52 PM, wrote: >>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 19:44:52 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: > >>> I fail to understand, what does it matter if she helps herself to >>> everything her little heart desires??Â* It's clearly not something in >>> her control.Â* Have a little empathy, your wife might like you better. >>> >> No one is required to indulge obsessive eating habits.Â* However, this >> is a church dinner.Â* His wife invited her.Â* Since he doesn't do church >> events anyway, why should she have a problem with him not attending >> this time? >> > > Not a problemÂ* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on > her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and > they would expect to spend the night here. Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro. So, no problem. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> Not a problemÂ* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >> they would expect to spend the night here. > > Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.Â* So, no problem. > That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have her here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 8:40 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-10-22 8:05 PM, Janet wrote: >> In article >, >> says... >>> >>> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >>> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >>> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day.Â* She >>> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. >> >> Â*Â* Why would she need to consult you about inviting BN to the church >> dinner, as you wouldn't be there anyway? > > > The reason is that she doesn't live around here and would presumably be > driven down by her husband, who I would be expected to entertain. They > consider coming down here a weekend in the country and would expect to > stay overnight.Â* After my previous experiences with her, I don't want > her in my house. > She wasn't invited to your house, Dave. You yourself posted "plans have changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not coming to my house." So what the heck are you worried about? Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-22 9:05 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 10/22/2017 8:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: >> Oh, I can understand it.Â* You buy something special for a meal or >> treat in the coming week and when you go to get it, gone.Â* Or you set >> aside something to take for lunch the next day and at 6 AM redy to >> leave for work you find it is gone. >> >> Finishing up the last of the mashed potatoes on the table is ok, but >> BN goes on scavenging missions. > > I agree, Ed.Â* But in Dave's recent post she's not going to spend then > night.Â* She's taking a bus to and from the church dinner.Â* It would be > different if she was going to spend the night, but that was not > indicated.Â* Maybe he's just worried she'll miss the last bus... > > I thought I was pretty clear in the original post that the plans changed and that she is no coming down by bus. That means my wife has to go to another city to pick her up at the bus station and then take her back to that city to take the bus back home. Yes, there is some concern that she might miss the last bus, but I have been very firm that she is not coming here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 1:43:41 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither > my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church > events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She > invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I > would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went > ahead and invited her. > > Nope. No way. Not happening. I am in the dog house. Plans have > changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken > to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not > coming to my house.... not this weekend, or any time in the future. > > > I am in deep shit over it, but I should be able to sleep well, not > having to worry about someone sneaking through the pantry and helping > herself to everything her little heart desires. There is a line in the > sand. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but > she is not to be invited to come on her own. I hope you are all happy. I > have probably been cut off for a while, but... it's worth it. And now you're in hot water. None of this would have happened if only you had accepted Jesus as your personal savior and gone to church. Aye, the fruit of sin is always bitter. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:11:27 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >I thought I was pretty clear in the original post that the plans >changed and that she is no coming down by bus. That means my wife has to >go to another city to pick her up at the bus station and then take her >back to that city to take the bus back home. It was clear to me. Maybe Jill reads too fast. >Yes, there is some concern that she might miss the last bus, but I have >been very firm that she is not coming here. What if she DOES miss the last bus? Will you sleep in the kitchen? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-22 9:29 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:11:27 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> I thought I was pretty clear in the original post that the plans >> changed and that she is no coming down by bus. That means my wife has to >> go to another city to pick her up at the bus station and then take her >> back to that city to take the bus back home. > > It was clear to me. Maybe Jill reads too fast. > >> Yes, there is some concern that she might miss the last bus, but I have >> been very firm that she is not coming here. > > What if she DOES miss the last bus? Will you sleep in the kitchen? > I may have to. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 5:44 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> I hope you are all happy. I have probably been cut off for a while, > but... it's worth it. TMI!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 7:30 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-10-22 9:29 PM, Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:11:27 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> I thought I was pretty clear in the original post thatÂ* the plans >>> changed and that she is no coming down by bus. That means my wife has to >>> go to another city to pick her up at the bus station and then take her >>> back to that city to take the bus back home. >> >> It was clear to me. Maybe Jill reads too fast. >> >>> Yes, there is some concern that she might miss the last bus, but I have >>> been very firm that she is not coming here. >> >> What if she DOES miss the last bus? Will you sleep in the kitchen? >> > > I may have to. WTF?!?!?! Are you _serious_ about this crap?? Dude. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:37:28 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > I understand that it is a form of theft. I have previously posted about > how she had stayed at our apartment and I was in hot water for having > baked a double batch of chocolate chip cookies and my wife was upset > because the girl was supposed to be on Weight Watchers. Not a problem. I > put them into two cans and stashed them at the back of the bottom > cupboard. After she left I went to get the cookies from the hiding place > they were all gone.... a double batch, about 60 cookies. She had gone > snooping and found two cans of cookies that had obviously been hidden, > and she ate them all..... all 60 cookies. Life imitates art (again): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsHoWJgkENY -- Bob St Francis would have done better to preach to the cats |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: >> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > >>> Not a problem* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >>> they would expect to spend the night here. >> >> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.* So, no problem. >> > >That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have >her here. Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Opinicus" wrote in message
l.which.is.quite.invalid... On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 20:37:28 -0400, Dave Smith > wrote: > I understand that it is a form of theft. I have previously posted about > how she had stayed at our apartment and I was in hot water for having > baked a double batch of chocolate chip cookies and my wife was upset > because the girl was supposed to be on Weight Watchers. Not a problem. I > put them into two cans and stashed them at the back of the bottom > cupboard. After she left I went to get the cookies from the hiding place > they were all gone.... a double batch, about 60 cookies. She had gone > snooping and found two cans of cookies that had obviously been hidden, > and she ate them all..... all 60 cookies. Life imitates art (again): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NsHoWJgkENY Bob == <g> -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/22/2017 4:44 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither > my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church > events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She > invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I > would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went > ahead and invited her. > > Nope. No way. Not happening. I am in the dog house. Plans have > changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken > to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not > coming to my house.... not this weekend, or any time in the future. > > > I am in deep shit over it, but I should be able to sleep well, not > having to worry about someone sneaking through the pantry and helping > herself to everything her little heart desires. There is a line in the > sand. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but > she is not to be invited to come on her own. I hope you are all happy. I > have probably been cut off for a while, but... it's worth it. > I have to wonder what is really meant by " BN is now taking the bus down". |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 12:28 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> He just can't stop this charade at somebody else's expense. > > -sw Steve Wertz - unrepentant woman stalker and total head case begging poor Omelet to shoot him with a sniper rifle in austin.food: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ost > 3/18/2011 3:49 PM Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162 readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles. -sw --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away. There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- https://www.centraltexasfoodbank.org...ntation-057jpg Hide the Ho Ho's!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-23 11:10 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>> >>>>> Not a problemÂ* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >>>>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >>>>> they would expect to spend the night here. >>>> >>>> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.Â* So, no problem. >>>> >>> >>> That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have >>> her here. >> >> Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... > > His poor wife; is it not her home too? Yes, it is her house too. However, there are limits. The niece is not a pleasant person to be around and I cannot bear the way snoops through cupboards and steals food. For crying out loud, no matter how much food is out and being served, she will go in and root around, opening up boxes and stuffing her face. If she sees items in the house that she likes she will ask if she can have them. Then there are the things she has simply taken without asking. I don't want to have to pay for the enormous amount of food she eats when she is here and I told want her going through my pantry and opening things up and eating them. I don't want her in my house. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but inviting her individually was totally unacceptable to me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
says... > > On 2017-10-22 8:05 PM, Janet wrote: > > In article >, > > says... > >> > >> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither > >> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church > >> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She > >> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. > > > > Why would she need to consult you about inviting BN to the church > > dinner, as you wouldn't be there anyway? > > > The reason is that she doesn't live around here and would presumably be > driven down by her husband, who I would be expected to entertain. "Presumably" her husband could have gone to the dinner with them. As they only live a bus journey away, he could then easily drive her home. You're just trying to put your downtrodden wife in the wrong because she stood up to your surly control-freakery. Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 9:32 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2017-10-23 11:10 AM, Janet wrote: >> In article >, >> says... >>> >>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Not a problemÂ* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >>>>>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >>>>>> they would expect to spend the night here. >>>>> >>>>> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.Â* So, no problem. >>>>> >>>> >>>> That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have >>>> her here. >>> >>> Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... >> >> Â*Â* His poor wife; is it not her home too? > > > Yes, it is her house too. However, there are limits.Â* The niece is not a > pleasant person to be around and I cannot bear the way snoops through > cupboards and steals food. For crying out loud, no matter how much food > is out and being served, she will go in and root around, opening up > boxes and stuffing her face. If she sees items in the house that she > likes she will ask if she can have them. Then there are the things she > has simply taken without asking.Â* I don't want to have to pay for the > enormous amount of food she eats when she is here and I told want her > going through my pantry and opening things up and eating them. I don't > want her in my house. It is bad enough that she has to be included in > family events, but inviting her individually was totally unacceptable to > me. > Simple but somewhat involved answer. Empty your cupboards and pantry save for a few boxes. Fill those with green rat poison cubes, or (if you're feeling charitable) soft chewy Ex Lax tabs. Done. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 9:33 AM, Janet wrote:
> You're just trying to put your downtrodden wife in the wrong because > she stood up to your surly control-freakery. > > Janet UK Wot stands up to THESE? https://fi.realself.com/original/b002-36114.jpg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2017-10-23 11:33 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> On 2017-10-22 8:05 PM, Janet wrote: >>> In article >, >>> says... >>>> >>>> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >>>> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >>>> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She >>>> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. >>> >>> Why would she need to consult you about inviting BN to the church >>> dinner, as you wouldn't be there anyway? >> >> >> The reason is that she doesn't live around here and would presumably be >> driven down by her husband, who I would be expected to entertain. > > "Presumably" her husband could have gone to the dinner with them. As > they only live a bus journey away, he could then easily drive her home. > Nothing presumable about that. My wife had bought two tickets. When I did not want to go she asked our son, but he was working. The intercity bus trip is a minimum hour and a half each way, plus the public transit time from her house to the bus station. Then it is a 2o minute drive from the bus station the city where the church is. It really would be much easier for him to drive her. I doubt he would want to go to the church dinner. I am positive that if they drover down they would expect to stay overnight. No thanks. > You're just trying to put your downtrodden wife in the wrong because > she stood up to your surly control-freakery. > It is not control freakery to not want someone in my house who I know is likely to steal. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 11:10 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>> >>>>> Not a problem* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >>>>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >>>>> they would expect to spend the night here. >>>> >>>> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.* So, no problem. >>>> >>> >>> That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have >>> her here. >> >> Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... > > His poor wife; is it not her home too? > > Janet UK > Of course it is. But if I had someone who came over and ate everything in sight (not offered) I'd have a problem with it, too. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 06:18:28 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote: >On 10/22/2017 4:44 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither >> my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church >> events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She >> invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I >> would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went >> ahead and invited her. >> >> Nope. No way. Not happening. I am in the dog house. Plans have >> changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken >> to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not >> coming to my house.... not this weekend, or any time in the future. >> >> >> I am in deep shit over it, but I should be able to sleep well, not >> having to worry about someone sneaking through the pantry and helping >> herself to everything her little heart desires. There is a line in the >> sand. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but >> she is not to be invited to come on her own. I hope you are all happy. I >> have probably been cut off for a while, but... it's worth it. >> > > >I have to wonder what is really meant by " BN is now taking the bus down". Big Niece is weighing the bus down... it can't move! LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:37:33 -0600, Casa lo pensa >
wrote: >On 10/23/2017 9:32 AM, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2017-10-23 11:10 AM, Janet wrote: >>> In article >, >>> says... >>>> >>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith >>>> > wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> Not a problem* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >>>>>>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >>>>>>> they would expect to spend the night here. >>>>>> >>>>>> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.* So, no problem. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have >>>>> her here. >>>> >>>> Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... >>> >>> ** His poor wife; is it not her home too? >> >> >> Yes, it is her house too. However, there are limits.* The niece is not a >> pleasant person to be around and I cannot bear the way snoops through >> cupboards and steals food. For crying out loud, no matter how much food >> is out and being served, she will go in and root around, opening up >> boxes and stuffing her face. If she sees items in the house that she >> likes she will ask if she can have them. Then there are the things she >> has simply taken without asking.* I don't want to have to pay for the >> enormous amount of food she eats when she is here and I told want her >> going through my pantry and opening things up and eating them. I don't >> want her in my house. It is bad enough that she has to be included in >> family events, but inviting her individually was totally unacceptable to >> me. >> > >Simple but somewhat involved answer. > >Empty your cupboards and pantry save for a few boxes. > >Fill those with green rat poison cubes, or (if you're feeling >charitable) soft chewy Ex Lax tabs. Imagine what BN would do to the sceptic tank with a BM! LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 10:42 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> But if I had someone who came over and ate everything in sight (not > offered) I'd have a problem with it, too. > > Jill Jack Sprat could eat no fat His wife could eat no lean And so betwixt the two of them They licked the platter clean Jack ate all the lean, Joan ate all the fat. The bone they picked it clean, Then gave it to the cat |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 22, 2017 at 1:43:41 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> Yep. That's what I am in. It seems that my wife was upset that neither > my son or I would attend a dinner at her church. I do not do church > events, and he has a good excuse because he is working that day. She > invited her niece... the Big Niece. I was not consulted. She knew I > would say no. Maybe she thought it would be a fait accomplis if she went > ahead and invited her. > > Nope. No way. Not happening. I am in the dog house. Plans have > changed a bit. BN is now taking the bus down, being picked up and taken > to the dinner, then back to the bus for the trip home. She is not > coming to my house.... not this weekend, or any time in the future. > > > I am in deep shit over it, but I should be able to sleep well, not > having to worry about someone sneaking through the pantry and helping > herself to everything her little heart desires. There is a line in the > sand. It is bad enough that she has to be included in family events, but > she is not to be invited to come on her own. I hope you are all happy. I > have probably been cut off for a while, but... it's worth it. You should be in deep shit. It wouldn't have killed you to do this one simple thing. The reality is that you do shit that you don't want to do because you love and respect your wife. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 10:51 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2017 09:37:33 -0600, Casa lo pensa > > wrote: > >> On 10/23/2017 9:32 AM, Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2017-10-23 11:10 AM, Janet wrote: >>>> In article >, >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: >>>>>>> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Not a problemÂ* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on >>>>>>>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and >>>>>>>> they would expect to spend the night here. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.Â* So, no problem. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have >>>>>> her here. >>>>> >>>>> Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... >>>> >>>> Â*Â* His poor wife; is it not her home too? >>> >>> >>> Yes, it is her house too. However, there are limits.Â* The niece is not a >>> pleasant person to be around and I cannot bear the way snoops through >>> cupboards and steals food. For crying out loud, no matter how much food >>> is out and being served, she will go in and root around, opening up >>> boxes and stuffing her face. If she sees items in the house that she >>> likes she will ask if she can have them. Then there are the things she >>> has simply taken without asking.Â* I don't want to have to pay for the >>> enormous amount of food she eats when she is here and I told want her >>> going through my pantry and opening things up and eating them. I don't >>> want her in my house. It is bad enough that she has to be included in >>> family events, but inviting her individually was totally unacceptable to >>> me. >>> >> >> Simple but somewhat involved answer. >> >> Empty your cupboards and pantry save for a few boxes. >> >> Fill those with green rat poison cubes, or (if you're feeling >> charitable) soft chewy Ex Lax tabs. > > Imagine what BN would do to the sceptic tank with a BM! LOL > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DC_M2VgfVA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/23/2017 11:02 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> The reality is that you do shit that you don't want to do because you love and respect your wife. But there must be some limitations... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpFD-kgQxnI w/ apologies to the Goo Goo Dolls... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
says... > > On 2017-10-23 11:10 AM, Janet wrote: > > In article >, > > says... > >> > >> On Sun, 22 Oct 2017 21:07:45 -0400, Dave Smith > >> > wrote: > >> > >>> On 2017-10-22 9:03 PM, jmcquown wrote: > >>>> On 10/22/2017 8:43 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > >>> > >>>>> Not a problem* if she lived nearby and could manage transportation on > >>>>> her own. The scenario would be for her husband to drive her down and > >>>>> they would expect to spend the night here. > >>>> > >>>> Except you said she's taking the bus, to and fro.* So, no problem. > >>>> > >>> > >>> That was the arrangement after I found out about it and refused to have > >>> her here. > >> > >> Now all becomes clear, you laid down the law in YOUR house... > > > > His poor wife; is it not her home too? > > > Yes, it is her house too. However, there are limits. The niece is not a > pleasant person to be around Evidently your wife disagrees. Why else would she invite her to dinner. Janet UK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who Was It That Recently Asked About A Hot Water Heater -- I'm In Hot Water! | General Cooking | |||
Tap Water VS Bottled Water | Tea | |||
Water, of course! | General Cooking | |||
Got V-8 in my water. | General Cooking | |||
Bottled water, is it better than tap water? | General Cooking |