On 11/13/2017 2:50 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 9:14:45 AM UTC-10, casa chevrolet wrote:
>>
>> I know why, he was tuned in to:
>>
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4PWP...396B5D4BB18 9
>
> That stuff puts people's head in a weird place.
>

Like Betty Boop on acid!

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>> snip
>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>>
>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>
>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>
>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>> to warrant courtesy.
>> Janet US
>>
>
>Trump has been courteous to everyone so far (I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>
>That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>facts.
>
>Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>
>Hard to change what has almost always been effective.
>
that's it, you're outta here. I didn't know you were a fake news
proponent.
Janet US

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:52:50 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 2:07:43 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> >
>> > You had better watch you back ... It doesn't bear thinking about ...
>> > ;p
>> >
>> > Are the cats very outnumbered?
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>>
>> Off hand, I'd say the cats are outnumbered. I don't ever see any kittens -
>> what's that about? Perhaps they've lost their mittens.
>>
>> ==
>>
>> That is probably why don't don't attack the chickens. They know they would
>> be pecked to death.
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>As I recall from my Sunday school days, chickens laying down with cats pretty much means that the end times are nigh.

I missed that particular Sunday School lesson ;-))) Maybe that was
Ghost Busters?
Janet US

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>> snip
>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>>
>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>
>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>
>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>> to warrant courtesy.
>> Janet US
>>
>
>Trump has been courteous to everyone so far

Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
very courteous. It's interesting now so many facts like that are
coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.
Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.



(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>
>That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>facts.
>
>Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>
>Hard to change what has almost always been effective.
>

>>On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:

>>> That is probably why don't don't attack the chickens. They know they would
>>> be pecked to death.

Never stopped one of 16 cats on the ranch I usta lodge!

I was jes a kid, but I recall Ed (the man) tossing one of the 2 black
cats into a Bantam hen's new brood. She tried to peck the cat, to
save her new brood of half dozen newly hatched chicks, but not before
the cat skiddadled with one now-dead chick. Ed took out that
particular cat with a .410 shotgun.

All the other cats never bothered the banty chickens. One did and one
died. Maybe the other cats heard about it!

nb

On 11/13/2017 4:47 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>> snip
>>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>>
>>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>>
>>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>>> to warrant courtesy.
>>> Janet US
>>>
>>
>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far (I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>>
>> That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>> facts.
>>
>> Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>>
>> Hard to change what has almost always been effective.
>>
> that's it, you're outta here. I didn't know you were a fake news
> proponent.
> Janet US
>

Almost ALL news now is "fake news".

This media cannot be trusted to do anything even approximating what
Deutsche Welle or the BBC produce.

The best bets right now domestically, for those who care, are Reuters
and the AP wire.

NPR is mostly trustworthy, likewise the Christian Science Monitor.

An older but revealing study on the matter:

http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/Me...64?RelNum=6664

"Groseclose and Milyo based their research on a standard gauge of a
lawmaker's support for liberal causes. Americans for Democratic Action
(ADA) tracks the percentage of times that each lawmaker votes on the
liberal side of an issue. Based on these votes, the ADA assigns a
numerical score to each lawmaker, where "100" is the most liberal and
"0" is the most conservative. After adjustments to compensate for
disproportionate representation that the Senate gives to low€‘population
states and the lack of representation for the District of Columbia, the
average ADA score in Congress (50.1) was assumed to represent the
political position of the average U.S.voter.

Groseclose and Milyo then directed 21 research assistants €” most of them
college students €” to scour U.S. media coverage of the past 10 years.
They tallied the number of times each media outlet referred to think
tanks and policy groups, such as the left-leaning NAACP or the
right-leaning Heritage Foundation.

The most centrist outlet proved to be the "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer."
CNN's "News Night With Aaron Brown" and ABC's "Good Morning America"
were a close second and third.

"Our estimates for these outlets, we feel, give particular credibility
to our efforts, as three of the four moderators for the 2004
presidential and vice-presidential debates came from these three news
outlets €” Jim Lehrer, CharlieGibson and Gwen Ifill," Groseclose said.
"If these newscasters weren't centrist, staffers for one of the campaign
teams would have objected and insisted on other moderators."

The fourth most centrist outlet was "Special Report With Brit Hume" on
Fox News, which often is cited by liberals as an egregious example of a
right-wing outlet. While this news program proved to be right of center,
the study found ABC's "World News Tonight" and NBC's "Nightly News" to
be left of center. All three outlets were approximately equidistant from
the center, the report found.

"If viewers spent an equal amount of time watching Fox's 'Special
Report' as ABC's'World News' and NBC's 'Nightly News,' then they would
receive a nearly perfectly balanced version of the news," said Milyo, an
associate professor of economics and public affairs at the University of
Missouri at Columbia.

Five news outlets €” "NewsHour With Jim Lehrer," ABC's"Good Morning
America," CNN's "News Night With Aaron Brown," Fox News' "Special Report
With Brit Hume" and the Drudge Report €” were in a statistical dead heat
in the race for the most centrist news outlet. Of the print media, USA
Today was the most centrist.

An additional feature of the study shows how each outlet compares in
political orientation with actual lawmakers. The news pages of The Wall
Street Journal scored a little to the left of the average American
Democrat, as determined by the average ADA score of all Democrats in
Congress (85 versus 84). With scores in the mid-70s, CBS' "Evening News"
and The New York Times looked similar to Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn.,
who has an ADA score of 74."



I wonder how many of those resources you consume on a daily basis?

I generally trace a given story across half a dozen before I'm done.

Trusting the swill that comes out of any of major broadcast networks is
like believing the dreck that infests Foolsbook - which is where
millenials mainly get their indoctrination sermons.

Ya, you'd best *plonk* me for being willing to turn over a whole lot of
stones to get to what at least looks like the cross-referenced truth.

On 11/13/2017 5:02 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>> snip
>>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>>
>>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>>
>>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>>> to warrant courtesy.
>>> Janet US
>>>
>>
>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far
>
> Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
> very courteous.

Um, did that happen AFTER he became President, or many YEARS before?

Read what I said again for COMPREHENSION:

"Trump has been courteous to everyone so far..."

- and that's where you snipped my context -

"(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!"

Basically so.

> It's interesting now so many facts like that are
> coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.

You have a real sexism problem, your own.

> Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.

Maybe so.

But it did NOT happen since he was elected, now did it?

>crickets<


> (I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>>
>> That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>> facts.
>>
>> Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>>
>> Hard to change what has almost always been effective.

On 11/13/2017 6:47 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
> wrote:
>
a bunch of crap
>>
> that's it, you're outta here. I didn't know you were a fake news
> proponent.
> Janet US
>
casa is a constant nymshifting troll.

OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
& butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
Top with a sprinkling of small capers.

Jill

On 11/13/2017 7:04 PM, notbob wrote:
> I was jes a kid, but I recall Ed (the man) tossing one of the 2 black
> cats into a Bantam hen's new brood. She tried to peck the cat, to
> save her new brood of half dozen newly hatched chicks, but not before
> the cat skiddadled with one now-dead chick. Ed took out that
> particular cat with a .410 shotgun.

What the hell? This guy [Ed, (the man)] tossed a cat into a hen's new
brood, seemingly *wanted* it to kill a chick, then when it did he shot
the cat?! What the hell kind of country ass world did you live in when
you were 'jes a kid'?! That's horrific.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:
>
>casa is a constant nymshifting troll.

I no longer click on any "Casa" posts... they're all useless faggots.

>OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>& butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>
>Jill

Tonight I cooked two thick pork chops and refried black beans...
enough left for tomorrow.

On 11/13/2017 5:17 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 6:47 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>> wrote:
>>
> a bunch of crap
>>>
>> that's it, you're outta here.Â* I didn't know you were a fake news
>> proponent.
>> Janet US
>>
> casa is a constant nymshifting troll.

Nah, I vary which casa I'm in, but otherwise only Sqwerty gets frogged.

And as a craven woman-stalking POS who even stalked YOU I find it
amazing that you still interact with that fat virus.

On 11/13/2017 5:31 PM, wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> casa is a constant nymshifting troll.
>
> I no longer click on any "Casa" posts... they're all useless faggots.

You click on \any post\ that paints you in a good light, stop lying.

And frankly you earn quite a few.

Makes me wonder why you behave so irrationally here.

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:10:00 -0700, casa chevrolet >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 5:02 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>> snip
>>>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>>>
>>>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>>>> to warrant courtesy.
>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>>
>>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far
>>
>> Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
>> very courteous.
>
>Um, did that happen AFTER he became President, or many YEARS before?
>
>Read what I said again for COMPREHENSION:
>
>"Trump has been courteous to everyone so far..."
>
>- and that's where you snipped my context -
>
>"(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!"
>
>Basically so.
>
>> It's interesting now so many facts like that are
>> coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.
>
>You have a real sexism problem, your own.
>
>> Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.
>
>Maybe so.
>
>But it did NOT happen since he was elected, now did it?

That it EVER happens, speaks for what he is like.
>
> >crickets<
>
>
>> (I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>>>
>>> That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>>> facts.
>>>
>>> Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>>>
>>> Hard to change what has almost always been effective.

On 11/13/2017 7:31 PM, wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> casa is a constant nymshifting troll.
>
> I no longer click on any "Casa" posts... they're all useless faggots.
>
>> OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>> lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>> & butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>> Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>>
>> Jill
>
> Tonight I cooked two thick pork chops and refried black beans...
> enough left for tomorrow.
>
How do you cook your thick pork chops? I tend not to buy them unless I
intend to stuff them. (I haven't done that in a long time, although
Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)

Jill

On 11/13/2017 5:52 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:10:00 -0700, casa chevrolet >
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/13/2017 5:02 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/13/2017 2:31 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 14:05:46 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11/13/2017 1:53 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:09:31 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>> snip
>>>>>>> Knock off the name calling. You are becoming very tiresome
>>>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When attacked I tend to punch back just a measure or three harder, a
>>>>>> time tested and efficacious strategy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lucrezia, as many know, is far from my favorite poster here.
>>>>>
>>>>> How laudable -- just like the ahole in the wh. she doesn't have to be
>>>>> to warrant courtesy.
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far
>>>
>>> Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
>>> very courteous.
>>
>> Um, did that happen AFTER he became President, or many YEARS before?
>>
>> Read what I said again for COMPREHENSION:
>>
>> "Trump has been courteous to everyone so far..."
>>
>> - and that's where you snipped my context -
>>
>> "(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!"
>>
>> Basically so.
>>
>>> It's interesting now so many facts like that are
>>> coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.
>>
>> You have a real sexism problem, your own.
>>
>>> Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.
>>
>> Maybe so.
>>
>> But it did NOT happen since he was elected, now did it?
>
> That it EVER happens, speaks for what he is like.

Oh really?!?!?!

So you're of the *perfect human* camp?

We had one of those once upon a time - he was........CRUCIFIED to death!

And I can't recall seeing a messiah on any ballot lately.

Including that outright Marxist of yours who was raised to pander to
communists.


>>> crickets<
>>
>>
>>> (I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>>>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!
>>>>
>>>> That's got to be a real pea under the saddle for the left, but facts is
>>>> facts.
>>>>
>>>> Like I said my return ratio is 3:1.
>>>>
>>>> Hard to change what has almost always been effective.

On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:

>>
> How do you cook your thick pork chops?Â* I tend not to buy them unless I
> intend to stuff them.Â* (I haven't done that in a long time, although
> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>
> Jill

I like them breaded. Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
oven to finish them to 135 internal. We had them Sunday night.

On 11/13/2017 6:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>
>>>
>> How do you cook your thick pork chops?Â* I tend not to buy them unless
>> I intend to stuff them.Â* (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>>
>> Jill
>
> I like them breaded.Â* Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
> oven to finish them to 135 internal.Â* We had them Sunday night.

Top tip - brine 1st for 4-6 hrs. in a quart of water with salt, sugar,
and cider vinegar.

The juiciness will be 'out of bounds' as Fieri says.

On 11/13/2017 8:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>
>>>
>> How do you cook your thick pork chops?Â* I tend not to buy them unless
>> I intend to stuff them.Â* (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>>
>> Jill
>
> I like them breaded.Â* Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
> oven to finish them to 135 internal.Â* We had them Sunday night.

I sometimes do that with medium pork chops. I'm not sure what Sheldon
(or you) mean by "thick" pork chops. Locality differences, varying by
region? IMHO, a thick chop is about 2 inches. Enough room to cut a
pocket in the middle for stuffing. I prefer cornbread stuffing.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 7:04 PM, notbob wrote:
>> I was jes a kid, but I recall Ed (the man) tossing one of
>> the 2 black
>> cats into a Bantam hen's new brood. She tried to peck the
>> cat, to
>> save her new brood of half dozen newly hatched chicks, but
>> not before
>> the cat skiddadled with one now-dead chick. Ed took out that
>> particular cat with a .410 shotgun.
>
> What the hell? This guy [Ed, (the man)] tossed a cat into a
> hen's new brood, seemingly *wanted* it to kill a chick, then
> when it did he shot the cat?! What the hell kind of country
> ass world did you live in when you were 'jes a kid'?!
> That's horrific.
>
> Jill

I tink he is 'jes fulla sh*t.

On 11/13/2017 8:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 8:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>> How do you cook your thick pork chops?Â* I tend not to buy them unless
>>> I intend to stuff them.Â* (I haven't done that in a long time,
>>> although Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I like them breaded.Â* Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400
>> degree oven to finish them to 135 internal.Â* We had them Sunday night.
>
> I sometimes do that with medium pork chops.Â* I'm not sure what Sheldon
> (or you) mean by "thick" pork chops.Â* Locality differences, varying by
> region?Â* IMHO, a thick chop is about 2 inches.Â* Enough room to cut a
> pocket in the middle for stuffing.Â* I prefer cornbread stuffing.
>
> Jill


These were 1 1/4"

On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 1:49:02 PM UTC-10, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>
> I missed that particular Sunday School lesson ;-))) Maybe that was
> Ghost Busters?
> Janet US

You're absolutely right. That was Ghost Busters. I always get that mixed up with Sunday school. Thanks!

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:17:06 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 6:47 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>> wrote:
>>
>a bunch of crap
>>>
>> that's it, you're outta here. I didn't know you were a fake news
>> proponent.
>> Janet US
>>
>casa is a constant nymshifting troll.
>
>OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>& butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>
>Jill

I love chicken picatta. I keep thinking I need to make it and then
forget. Maybe next week.
Janet US

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:55:57 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 7:31 PM, wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>> casa is a constant nymshifting troll.
>>
>> I no longer click on any "Casa" posts... they're all useless faggots.
>>
>>> OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>>> lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>>> & butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>>> Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> Tonight I cooked two thick pork chops and refried black beans...
>> enough left for tomorrow.
>>
>How do you cook your thick pork chops? I tend not to buy them unless I
>intend to stuff them. (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>
>Jill
My stuffed pork chops turned out pretty good. When I am doing thick
pork chops, I brown one side very well, turn the chop, and then put
the pan in the preheated oven at 350F for about 8 minutes (timing
depends upon how well done you like your chops. )
Janet US

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:48:54 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 8:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>> How do you cook your thick pork chops?* I tend not to buy them unless
>>> I intend to stuff them.* (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>>> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I like them breaded.* Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
>> oven to finish them to 135 internal.* We had them Sunday night.
>
>I sometimes do that with medium pork chops. I'm not sure what Sheldon
>(or you) mean by "thick" pork chops. Locality differences, varying by
>region? IMHO, a thick chop is about 2 inches. Enough room to cut a
>pocket in the middle for stuffing. I prefer cornbread stuffing.
>
>Jill

I don't get a 2 inch chop, I get a healthy 1 inch chop. That's more
than I can eat really.
Janet US

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:52:19 -0400, wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:10:00 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>wrote:
>
>>On 11/13/2017 5:02 PM, wrote:
>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far
>>>
>>> Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
>>> very courteous.
>>
>>Um, did that happen AFTER he became President, or many YEARS before?
>>
>>Read what I said again for COMPREHENSION:
>>
>>"Trump has been courteous to everyone so far..."
>>
>>- and that's where you snipped my context -
>>
>>"(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>>totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!"
>>
>>Basically so.
>>
>>> It's interesting now so many facts like that are
>>> coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.
>>
>>You have a real sexism problem, your own.
>>
>>> Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.
>>
>>Maybe so.
>>
>>But it did NOT happen since he was elected, now did it?
>
>That it EVER happens, speaks for what he is like.

The Boner troll is a mental patient. To him, the only good people are
Americans and the only good Americans are extreme right-wing
Americans. Trump fits that picture.

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 16:48:55 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:52:50 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
>wrote:
>
>>On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>>> "dsi1" wrote in message

>>> Off hand, I'd say the cats are outnumbered. I don't ever see any kittens -
>>> what's that about? Perhaps they've lost their mittens.
>>>
>>> ==
>>>
>>> That is probably why don't don't attack the chickens. They know they would
>>> be pecked to death.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>>
>>As I recall from my Sunday school days, chickens laying down with cats pretty much means that the end times are nigh.
>
>I missed that particular Sunday School lesson ;-))) Maybe that was
>Ghost Busters?

LOL

In article >,
> wrote:

> >I used to live in Wisconsin, then Minnesota and then we moved to the
> >intermountain west.
> >Janet US
>
> The weather in that basin can vary considerably. I came very close to
> retiring in northern Carson City, NV.

We could have been buddies! It would have been a short hop of thirty
five miles from my house to yours. They just improved the highway, so I
could get there like lightning! Imagine how lucky you are for not doing
that ;-)
I could tell you about the birds I shot, deer I gutted and fish I
caught while I scooted some random cat into the next room when you
weren't looking. You could cook me a grand meal with a boatload of
beer.
Ah, damn...life is full of missed opportunities.

leo

"U.S. Janet B." wrote in message
...

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:30:18 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"dsi1" wrote in message
...
>
>On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 2:07:43 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> You had better watch you back ... It doesn't bear thinking about ...
>> ;p
>>
>> Are the cats very outnumbered?
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>Off hand, I'd say the cats are outnumbered. I don't ever see any kittens -
>what's that about? Perhaps they've lost their mittens.
>
>==
>
>That is probably why don't don't attack the chickens. They know they would
>be pecked to death.

My feral cats won't mess with the wild ducks, they know they'd get
whupped good.
Janet US

==

Wise cats)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 10:30:35 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Monday, November 13, 2017 at 2:07:43 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> >
> > You had better watch you back ... It doesn't bear thinking about
> > ...
> > ;p
> >
> > Are the cats very outnumbered?
> >
> > --
> > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> Off hand, I'd say the cats are outnumbered. I don't ever see any kittens -
> what's that about? Perhaps they've lost their mittens.
>
> ==
>
> That is probably why don't don't attack the chickens. They know they
> would
> be pecked to death.
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

As I recall from my Sunday school days, chickens laying down with cats
pretty much means that the end times are nigh.

==

Are you sure it wasn't a lion and lamb, or something similar? hmmmm???


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"jmcquown" wrote in message news
On 11/13/2017 7:31 PM, wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> casa is a constant nymshifting troll.
>
> I no longer click on any "Casa" posts... they're all useless faggots.
>
>> OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>> lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>> & butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>> Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>>
>> Jill
>
> Tonight I cooked two thick pork chops and refried black beans...
> enough left for tomorrow.
>
How do you cook your thick pork chops? I tend not to buy them unless I
intend to stuff them. (I haven't done that in a long time, although
Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)

Jill

==

If it is of any interest, I sous vide them first and then brown them off.

We had that just yesterday, yummie


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message ...

On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:

>>
> How do you cook your thick pork chops? I tend not to buy them unless I
> intend to stuff them. (I haven't done that in a long time, although
> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>
> Jill

I like them breaded. Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
oven to finish them to 135 internal. We had them Sunday night.

=

Ah yes, I breaded ours too)


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 12:36:13 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>
> If it is of any interest, I sous vide them first and then brown them off.
>
> We had that just yesterday, yummie
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

That's the way I'd do it. I had a steak at a restaurant recently. They sous vide the steak so it came out fast and perfectly cooked. It's a wonderful thing for the foodservice industry.

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 12:36:13 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>
> If it is of any interest, I sous vide them first and then brown them off.
>
> We had that just yesterday, yummie
>

That's the way I'd do it. I had a steak at a restaurant recently. They sous
vide the steak so it came out fast and perfectly cooked. It's a wonderful
thing for the foodservice industry.

==

And for our table)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 11/13/2017 10:00 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:17:06 -0500, jmcquown >
> wrote:

>> OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>> lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>> & butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>> Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>>
>> Jill
>
> I love chicken picatta. I keep thinking I need to make it and then
> forget. Maybe next week.
> Janet US
>

I put some capers in the sauce too.

On 11/13/2017 11:22 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:52:19 -0400, wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 17:10:00 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/13/2017 5:02 PM, wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 15:56:35 -0700, casa chevrolet >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Trump has been courteous to everyone so far
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the clip of him referring to himself 'grabbing' women sounded
>>>> very courteous.
>>>
>>> Um, did that happen AFTER he became President, or many YEARS before?
>>>
>>> Read what I said again for COMPREHENSION:
>>>
>>> "Trump has been courteous to everyone so far..."
>>>
>>> - and that's where you snipped my context -
>>>
>>> "(I mean Chuck and Nancy got
>>> totally schmoozed), save for Fat Kim!"
>>>
>>> Basically so.
>>>
>>>> It's interesting now so many facts like that are
>>>> coming to light that nearly every man accused is repulsive to look at.
>>>
>>> You have a real sexism problem, your own.
>>>
>>>> Maybe that was the only way they could get near a woman.
>>>
>>> Maybe so.
>>>
>>> But it did NOT happen since he was elected, now did it?
>>
>> That it EVER happens, speaks for what he is like.
>
> The Boner troll is a mental patient.

Bwuthie is a bilious auztarded hate troll.

> To him, the only good people are
> Americans

Ah nope, but thanks for being absurd again.

> and the only good Americans are extreme right-wing
> Americans.

Wrong again, I prefer moderates.

> Trump fits that picture.

0 for 3!

Trump is about as close to center in reality as one can find.

That's AMERICAN center, not some pseudo-marxist Euro model.

Garsh you're a moron!

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:55:57 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 7:31 PM, wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>> casa is a constant nymshifting troll.
>>
>> I no longer click on any "Casa" posts... they're all useless faggots.
>>
>>> OB Food: Chicken picatta. Thinly sliced chicken breast cutlets,
>>> lightly dredged in seasoned flour (no egg wash) and browned in olive oil
>>> & butter. Deglaze the pan with a splash of white wine and lemon juice.
>>> Top with a sprinkling of small capers.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> Tonight I cooked two thick pork chops and refried black beans...
>> enough left for tomorrow.
>>
>How do you cook your thick pork chops? I tend not to buy them unless I
>intend to stuff them. (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)

I pan fry chops at medium heat until not quite done, then remove the
chops. Then after the beans are mashed and done I place the chops
into the beans to finish cooking. The trick is not to use high heat
for chops or beans. I've explained this a few times in the past and
even posted pictures that were not well received. Pork chops with
refried black beans are scrumptious. Black beans are Central American
style, not Tex Mex pinto bean style... black beans are far better for
refried.

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:48:54 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 11/13/2017 8:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>> How do you cook your thick pork chops?* I tend not to buy them unless
>>> I intend to stuff them.* (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>>> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> I like them breaded.* Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
>> oven to finish them to 135 internal.* We had them Sunday night.
>
>I sometimes do that with medium pork chops. I'm not sure what Sheldon
>(or you) mean by "thick" pork chops. Locality differences, varying by
>region? IMHO, a thick chop is about 2 inches. Enough room to cut a
>pocket in the middle for stuffing. I prefer cornbread stuffing.

I've never seen a 2" pork chop. I buy 1" pork chops for stuffing or
for whatever. Two inch pork chops are almost a roast.
The chops I buy to go with refried black beans are 1" Thk, however any
lesser thickness works well, even 1/2" shoulder chops work very well.

On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:04:42 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:48:54 -0500, jmcquown >
>wrote:
>
>>On 11/13/2017 8:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2017 7:55 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> How do you cook your thick pork chops?* I tend not to buy them unless
>>>> I intend to stuff them.* (I haven't done that in a long time, although
>>>> Janet B and I did talk about stuffed pork chops recently.)
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> I like them breaded.* Sear in a pan and then put the pan in a 400 degree
>>> oven to finish them to 135 internal.* We had them Sunday night.
>>
>>I sometimes do that with medium pork chops. I'm not sure what Sheldon
>>(or you) mean by "thick" pork chops. Locality differences, varying by
>>region? IMHO, a thick chop is about 2 inches. Enough room to cut a
>>pocket in the middle for stuffing. I prefer cornbread stuffing.
>>
>>Jill
>
>I don't get a 2 inch chop, I get a healthy 1 inch chop. That's more
>than I can eat really.
>Janet US

1" is more normal.

On Tuesday, November 14, 2017 at 2:42:08 PM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>
> I pan fry chops at medium heat until not quite done, then remove the
> chops. Then after the beans are mashed and done I place the chops
> into the beans to finish cooking. The trick is not to use high heat
> for chops or beans. I've explained this a few times in the past and
> even posted pictures that were not well received. Pork chops with
> refried black beans are scrumptious. Black beans are Central American
> style, not Tex Mex pinto bean style... black beans are far better for
> refried.

I can fry up some chops pretty good. OTOH, here some sous vide loin chops that have been breaded and fried in a wok. They are tender packages of crispy, juicy, and tender, pork. Hoo boy!

https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...iG61PLGyQhjTGf

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...

> I can fry up some chops pretty good. OTOH, here some sous vide loin chops
> that have been breaded and fried in a wok. They are tender packages of
> crispy, juicy, and tender, pork. Hoo boy!
>
> https://www.amazon.com/photos/share/...iG61PLGyQhjTGf

Those look really great.

Cheri