On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:34:12 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:


>Yes, she does have OCD and her sister has ADHD. But psychologists can't
>seem to agree if it is a mental illness or a development problem. But here's
>an article that is a bit over 7 months old.
>
>https://www.verywellhealth.com/is-au...llness-4427991
>
>But you will find arguments for and against pigeon holing it as a mental
>illness.

I'm on the spectrum myself. I disagree that it is of itself an mental
illness. Often anxiety issues comes with autism and I feel that's the
greater problem that is also particularly noticeable to neurotypical
people (in relation to high functioning autistics , that is).

>This statement has nothing to do with her moment in the spotlight but I
>find her to look very, very young and underdeveloped to be 16. To my
>eyes, I feel like I'm looking at a 10-12 year old prepubescent; not a
>young lady on the cusp of womanhood.

Disagree, it depends on genetics. My wife is 40 years old but people
often mistakenly think she's in her early 20's. Go to certain
countries and you'll find quite a difference in appearance. That is
not to say her appearance may have been affected by developmental
issues, though.

On 2019-09-25 12:24 p.m., wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:22:54 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
>>
>> Do you still have your head in the sand?
>>
> Do you still believe every story reported or printed in the liberal media?
>
No! But judging from your "tone", you swallow up Murdochnews uncritically.

On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:


<G> https://vimeo.com/362315755

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 15:18:51 -0700 (PDT), A Moose in Love
> wrote:



>Some agro business corps are downright nasty. In the documentary 'Land Grabbing', there was a case where a family's land
>was just taken over, the home knocked down. The woman whose house it was tried to take one of her pots with her but
>was not even allowed that.

That sounds just like Trump's escapades in Scotland years ago in
relation to a golf course. Absolutely reprehensible behavior... so bad
in fact that the government eventually told him to **** off with his
development of the site. And it takes a LOT for the government there
to do something like that.

This is a documentary on the saga. It's very revealing about Trump's
sociopathy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fsfLTvnzwI8

And as a landlord in America, there are similar stories.

wrote:

> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 2:44:44 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 9:14:31 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:41:15 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The concerns of the younger generations are real. My guess is that her rage is not faked. Her strength is her ability to deliver a highly-focused message in a blunt, non-PC, manner. It's probably her weakness too.
> > > >
> > > OCD, which she either suffers from or enjoys, will do that to you. Her only
> > > sister has neurological problems as well.
> > >
> > > https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/...rgs-un-speech/
> >
> > Beats me if she has OCD. She does have an autistic spectrum disorder which can be debilitating while paradoxically, allows some people to soar. It's a double edged bazooka but I wouldn't call it mental illness.
> >
> Yes, she does have OCD and her sister has ADHD. But psychologists can't
> seem to agree if it is a mental illness or a development problem. But here's
> an article that is a bit over 7 months old.
>
> https://www.verywellhealth.com/is-au...llness-4427991
>
> But you will find arguments for and against pigeon holing it as a mental
> illness.
>
> This statement has nothing to do with her moment in the spotlight but I
> find her to look very, very young and underdeveloped to be 16. To my
> eyes, I feel like I'm looking at a 10-12 year old prepubescent; not a
> young lady on the cusp of womanhood.


Her countenance is extremely wierd and creepy, she's obviously been "programmed" by those with a hard leftist "agenda"...

I predict that the shrill miserable wretch will die a suicide well before the age of 20...no great loss for mankind...good riddance!

--
Best
Greg

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:05 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
>
> On 2019-09-25 12:24 p.m., wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:22:54 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
> >>
> >> Do you still have your head in the sand?
> >>
> > Do you still believe every story reported or printed in the liberal media?
> >
> No! But judging from your "tone", you swallow up Murdochnews uncritically.
>
I only recognize his name. I can't say that I've ever seen any program or
publication that he's presenting. My 'tone' always upsets you because it
does not dovetail with yours. You have trouble accepting that fact every
time I or anyone disagrees with you no matter the subject. Same old, same
old.

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>
> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
>
I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says..

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:08:54 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:05 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-09-25 12:24 p.m., wrote:
>>
>> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:22:54 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Do you still have your head in the sand?
>> >>
>> > Do you still believe every story reported or printed in the liberal media?
>> >
>> No! But judging from your "tone", you swallow up Murdochnews uncritically.
>>
>I only recognize his name. I can't say that I've ever seen any program or
>publication that he's presenting.

Rupert Murdoch is a media magnate, he certainly has an agenda of his
own, I wouldn't necessarily describe him as literally right wing as
such, even though he owns Fox news. It would be more accurate to say
he's definitely NOT left wing.

On 2019-09-25 5:58 p.m., GM wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 2:44:44 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 9:14:31 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:41:15 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The concerns of the younger generations are real. My guess is that her rage is not faked. Her strength is her ability to deliver a highly-focused message in a blunt, non-PC, manner. It's probably her weakness too.
>>>>>
>>>> OCD, which she either suffers from or enjoys, will do that to you. Her only
>>>> sister has neurological problems as well.
>>>>
>>>> https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/...rgs-un-speech/
>>>
>>> Beats me if she has OCD. She does have an autistic spectrum disorder which can be debilitating while paradoxically, allows some people to soar. It's a double edged bazooka but I wouldn't call it mental illness.
>>>
>> Yes, she does have OCD and her sister has ADHD. But psychologists can't
>> seem to agree if it is a mental illness or a development problem. But here's
>> an article that is a bit over 7 months old.
>>
>> https://www.verywellhealth.com/is-au...llness-4427991
>>
>> But you will find arguments for and against pigeon holing it as a mental
>> illness.
>>
>> This statement has nothing to do with her moment in the spotlight but I
>> find her to look very, very young and underdeveloped to be 16. To my
>> eyes, I feel like I'm looking at a 10-12 year old prepubescent; not a
>> young lady on the cusp of womanhood.
>
>
> Her countenance is extremely wierd and creepy, she's obviously been "programmed" by those with a hard leftist "agenda"...
>
> I predict that the shrill miserable wretch will die a suicide well before the age of 20...no great loss for mankind...good riddance!
>
You are the miserable wretch!

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 7:19:45 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>
> Rupert Murdoch is a media magnate, he certainly has an agenda of his
> own, I wouldn't necessarily describe him as literally right wing as
> such, even though he owns Fox news. It would be more accurate to say
> he's definitely NOT left wing.
>
I *think* I've watched Fox news once and not the entire broadcast.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
>>
>I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says.

She politely requests that the young woman stops talking.

On 2019-09-25 7:13 p.m., Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
>>>
>> I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says.
>
> She politely requests that the young woman stops talking.
>
I take it that Anglo-Saxon is not your first language:-)

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:18:24 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 2019-09-25 7:13 p.m., Bruce wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
>>>>
>>> I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says.
>>
>> She politely requests that the young woman stops talking.
>>
>I take it that Anglo-Saxon is not your first language:-)

lol

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:52:04 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 7:19:45 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>> Rupert Murdoch is a media magnate, he certainly has an agenda of his
>> own, I wouldn't necessarily describe him as literally right wing as
>> such, even though he owns Fox news. It would be more accurate to say
>> he's definitely NOT left wing.
>>
>I *think* I've watched Fox news once and not the entire broadcast.

I watch it out of sheer perverse curiosity sometimes.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 18:48:49 -0600, graham > wrote:


>> I predict that the shrill miserable wretch will die a suicide well before the age of 20...no great loss for mankind...good riddance!
>>
>You are the miserable wretch!

Never mind. People who talk like that are cowards at heart, they'd
never say that to somebody's face in real life, unless they were
certain there would be no repercussions.

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
>>
>I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says.

Americans are notoriously bad at accents other than their own, for
some reason. It amuses me no end at the subtitles put on American
programme's when perfectly plain English is being spoken

Anyway, she said: "shut up, you ****".

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 19:18:24 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 2019-09-25 7:13 p.m., Bruce wrote:
>> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
>>>>
>>> I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says.
>>
>> She politely requests that the young woman stops talking.
>>
>I take it that Anglo-Saxon is not your first language:-)

Ken oath, these seppos aren't the full quid sometimes*

*joking

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 11:34:16 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 2:44:44 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 9:14:31 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:41:15 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The concerns of the younger generations are real. My guess is that her rage is not faked. Her strength is her ability to deliver a highly-focused message in a blunt, non-PC, manner. It's probably her weakness too.
> > > >
> > > OCD, which she either suffers from or enjoys, will do that to you. Her only
> > > sister has neurological problems as well.
> > >
> > > https://wattsupwiththat.com/2019/09/...rgs-un-speech/
> >
> > Beats me if she has OCD. She does have an autistic spectrum disorder which can be debilitating while paradoxically, allows some people to soar. It's a double edged bazooka but I wouldn't call it mental illness.
> >
> Yes, she does have OCD and her sister has ADHD. But psychologists can't
> seem to agree if it is a mental illness or a development problem. But here's
> an article that is a bit over 7 months old.
>
> https://www.verywellhealth.com/is-au...llness-4427991
>
> But you will find arguments for and against pigeon holing it as a mental
> illness.
>
> This statement has nothing to do with her moment in the spotlight but I
> find her to look very, very young and underdeveloped to be 16. To my
> eyes, I feel like I'm looking at a 10-12 year old prepubescent; not a
> young lady on the cusp of womanhood.

Geeks have always been made fun of and ridiculed. I never did that as a kid, there's no reason to start doing that as an adult. As far as I can see, her neurological makeup, appearance, flat-facial affect, movement, pronunciation of English, etc., etc., etc., are not relevant to her message. That's the important part but this group will always allow itself to get distracted by the smallest of things. I think this group has ADS.

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 8:13:57 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 17:10:47 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:27:16 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, 21 Sep 2019 17:53:41 -0400, Dave Smith
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> <G> https://vimeo.com/362315755
> >>
> >I've played it three times but can't understand a word the older woman says.
>
> She politely requests that the young woman stops talking.
>
Ooooooh ok, thanks!! I even looked for a closed captioning button to
decipher her but was out of luck.

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 10:47:29 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>
> Geeks have always been made fun of and ridiculed.
>
She's not a geek.
>
> I never did that as a kid, there's no reason to start doing that as an adult. As far as I can see, her neurological makeup, appearance, flat-facial affect, movement, pronunciation of English, etc., etc., etc., are not relevant to her message.
>
I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
puberty?

On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 20:47:25 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>Geeks have always been made fun of and ridicule

Same old blah blah blah. Although, this time no mention of white anglo
saxon perpetrators being to blame. Well done.

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 05:22:07 +0700, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:34:12 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:
>
>
>>Yes, she does have OCD and her sister has ADHD. But psychologists can't
>>seem to agree if it is a mental illness or a development problem. But here's
>>an article that is a bit over 7 months old.
>>
>>https://www.verywellhealth.com/is-au...llness-4427991
>>
>>But you will find arguments for and against pigeon holing it as a mental
>>illness.
>
>I'm on the spectrum myself.

Talk about an overused overhyped term. On the spectrum. Every kid that
misbehaves has ADHD or is on the spectrum these days. You're not also
"gifted" by any chance?

Although "on the spectrum" would explain why you're so rigid and can't
handle when someone disagrees with you. There's only one truth and
that's JEBUS' TRUTH. Yeah, you might be right.

On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:

> I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
> 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
> puberty?

You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.

I like to say that posters here have the emotional maturity of 12 year olds. When I say stuff like that, it's most definitely meant to be an insult as well as an astute observation. But then again, I'm not as nice a person as you are.

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 03:37:55 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>
>> I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
>> 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
>> puberty?
>
>You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
>
>I like to say that posters here have the emotional maturity of 12 year olds.

Hey, that's emotional maturity shaming!

" wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 7:19:45 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
> >
> > Rupert Murdoch is a media magnate, he certainly has an agenda of his
> > own, I wouldn't necessarily describe him as literally right wing as
> > such, even though he owns Fox news. It would be more accurate to say
> > he's definitely NOT left wing.
> >
> I *think* I've watched Fox news once and not the entire broadcast.


Same here, Joan. I switched to Fox news maybe a couple of times
to see what was up with it. Only about one minute each time,
during a commercial break from some other show.

If they showed a general world news tonight like the networks do
I might watch it too. I always watch that each evening on either
ABC or NBC. 6:30eastern each night.

Each time I've checked out Fox news though, it's always a
discussion where conservative "experts" are telling us what we've
already heard on regular current events. Sorry, I don't need
"experts" explaining things that have occured. I don't listen to
any of the liberal expert shows either. I can make up my own
mind, thankyou.

graham wrote:
>
> On 2019-09-25 7:09 a.m., Gary wrote:
> > dsi1 wrote:
> >>
> >> Dave Smith wrote:
> >>> A good candidate for the most hypocritical participant would be a
> >>> Indigenous girl from a very remote northern community who would have
> >>> flown all the way. That would mean a huge carbon footprint.
> >>
> >> That 16 year old already has that covered.
> >
> > I agree. What a teenage actress she is.
> > Her short popular sound bite will end up on a comedy show.
> >
> > "How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my childhood
> > with your empty words.€�
> >
> > Me: lol (I love the fake rage almost to tears.)
> >
> You miserable sod!

No valid argument? Just that?

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:45:35 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>graham wrote:
>>
>> On 2019-09-25 7:09 a.m., Gary wrote:
>> > dsi1 wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Dave Smith wrote:
>> >>> A good candidate for the most hypocritical participant would be a
>> >>> Indigenous girl from a very remote northern community who would have
>> >>> flown all the way. That would mean a huge carbon footprint.
>> >>
>> >> That 16 year old already has that covered.
>> >
>> > I agree. What a teenage actress she is.
>> > Her short popular sound bite will end up on a comedy show.
>> >
>> > "How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my childhood
>> > with your empty words.€?
>> >
>> > Me: lol (I love the fake rage almost to tears.)
>> >
>> You miserable sod!
>
>No valid argument? Just that?

I do my part to save the planet every day, usually several times a
day... just tossed cucumber parings out my window.

wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 10:45:35 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> graham wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2019-09-25 7:09 a.m., Gary wrote:
>>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>> A good candidate for the most hypocritical participant would be a
>>>>>> Indigenous girl from a very remote northern community who would have
>>>>>> flown all the way. That would mean a huge carbon footprint.
>>>>>
>>>>> That 16 year old already has that covered.
>>>>
>>>> I agree. What a teenage actress she is.
>>>> Her short popular sound bite will end up on a comedy show.
>>>>
>>>> "How dare you! You have stolen my dreams and my childhood
>>>> with your empty words.€?
>>>>
>>>> Me: lol (I love the fake rage almost to tears.)
>>>>
>>> You miserable sod!
>>
>> No valid argument? Just that?
>
> I do my part to save the planet every day, usually several times a
> day... just tossed cucumber parings out my window.
>

Bet that garbage dump outside yoose window is really growing Popeye.

On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>
> > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
> > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
> > puberty?
>
> You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
>
Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.

On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
> > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
> > > puberty?
> >
> > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
> >
> Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
> year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
> or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.

I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old, it is with malicious/spiteful, intent. What you're saying is that yours was an inquiry of a strictly academic nature. Well okay. Point taken.

On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> >
>> > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
>> > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
>> > > puberty?
>> >
>> > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
>> >
>> Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
>> year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
>> or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.
>
>I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old, it is with malicious/spiteful, intent. What you're saying is that yours was an inquiry of a strictly academic nature. Well okay. Point taken.

Molehill --> mountain.

On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 1:25:42 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> >> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >> >
> >> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
> >> > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
> >> > > puberty?
> >> >
> >> > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
> >> >
> >> Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
> >> year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
> >> or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.
> >
> >I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old, it is with malicious/spiteful, intent. What you're saying is that yours was an inquiry of a strictly academic nature. Well okay. Point taken.
>
> Molehill --> mountain.

It might be a small matter to you but making snide remarks about a 16 year old's neurology or their physical appearance and their odd autistic ways is never a right move. Well, in my book it isn't although, I have to say that it's a pretty big book.

https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/...ingraham-trump

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:39:09 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 1:25:42 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 15:53:11 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>> >> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
>> >> > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
>> >> > > puberty?
>> >> >
>> >> > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
>> >> >
>> >> Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
>> >> year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
>> >> or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.
>> >
>> >I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old, it is with malicious/spiteful, intent. What you're saying is that yours was an inquiry of a strictly academic nature. Well okay. Point taken.
>>
>> Molehill --> mountain.
>
>It might be a small matter to you but making snide remarks about a 16 year old's neurology or their physical appearance and their odd autistic ways is never a right move. Well, in my book it isn't although, I have to say that it's a pretty big book.
>
>https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/...ingraham-trump

What's so terrible about saying that she looks much younger than she
is? I bet you'd like it if people said it about you.

On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:19:33 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>
> What's so terrible about saying that she looks much younger than she
> is? I bet you'd like it if people said it about you.

I'm not going to tell you. Why not ask the nearest 16 year old girl?

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 01:26:15 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:19:33 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>>
>> What's so terrible about saying that she looks much younger than she
>> is? I bet you'd like it if people said it about you.
>
>I'm not going to tell you. Why not ask the nearest 16 year old girl?

A 16 year old probably won't like to be told that she looks like a 12
year old, but I don't think she reads RFC.

In article >,
says...
>
> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> > On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
> > > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
> > > > puberty?
> > >
> > > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
> > >
> > Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
> > year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
> > or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.
>
> I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old,
it is with malicious/spiteful, intent.

As usual, you were wrong and don't know what you're talking about.

Every adult woman remembers that among her teenage peers there was a
wide variation in physical development and that such variation is
completely normal.

Janet UK

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 00:39:09 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:


>It might be a small matter to you but making snide remarks about a 16 year old's neurology or their physical appearance and their odd autistic ways is never a right move. Well, in my book it isn't although, I have to say that it's a pretty big book.
>
>https://www.vox.com/identities/2019/...ingraham-trump

You could have at least chosen a politically unbiased site. And you
still haven't figured out how to word-wrap after all these years.

On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 11:47:04 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >,
says...
>>
>> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>> > On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> > >
>> > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
>> > > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
>> > > > puberty?
>> > >
>> > > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
>> > >
>> > Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
>> > year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
>> > or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.
>>
>> I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old,
>it is with malicious/spiteful, intent.
>
> As usual, you were wrong and don't know what you're talking about.
>
>Every adult woman remembers that among her teenage peers there was a
>wide variation in physical development and that such variation is
>completely normal.

Shh, you're spoiling his fun. You know he loves to accuse people in
this group of bigotry and racism on the flimsiest of pretexts. Now we
can add ageism and disability discrimination to the list as well, I
suppose.

'My guess' is it's to deflect from his own inherent racism and
bigotry.

On Friday, September 27, 2019 at 12:47:10 AM UTC-10, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
> >
> > On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:45:09 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> > > On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 5:37:59 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:49:25 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I'm not making fun of her looks. I said she looks to be much younger than
> > > > > 16. She looks like a 12 year old and I wonder if she's even gone through
> > > > > puberty?
> > > >
> > > > You're saying that suggesting a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old is not body-shaming at all. Well okay, if you say so.
> > > >
> > > Did I walk up to her or jump in front of a camera and say she looks like a 12
> > > year old that has not reached puberty? Did I state this in a rally of hundreds
> > > or even thousands of people? No, I made a statement of how she appears to ME.
> >
> > I was under the impression that when a girl/woman says that a 16 year old girl has the body of a 12 year old,
> it is with malicious/spiteful, intent.
>
> As usual, you were wrong and don't know what you're talking about.
>
> Every adult woman remembers that among her teenage peers there was a
> wide variation in physical development and that such variation is
> completely normal.
>
> Janet UK

Yoose guys sound like people that have never raised kids.

On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:35:47 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Sep 2019 01:26:15 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
> >On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 10:19:33 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >>
> >> What's so terrible about saying that she looks much younger than she
> >> is? I bet you'd like it if people said it about you.
> >
> >I'm not going to tell you. Why not ask the nearest 16 year old girl?
>
> A 16 year old probably won't like to be told that she looks like a 12
> year old, but I don't think she reads RFC.

As we all know, reading rfc has the ability to change reality. This explains a lot - about you.