I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
this before?

--


"There are idiots among us, and they all believe in a god"
~Toidi Uoy

> wrote in message
...
>I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
> airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
> this before?

I used to make them in then oven. Can't remember the particulars. They're
not good for you. Can mess with your thyroid.

On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:26:38 -0500,
wrote:

>I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
>airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
>this before?

Just an update... After I rinsed my soybeans I soaked then for several
hours in franks hot sauce then threw them in the airfryer and they
turned out quite well. I really enjoyed them over salads.

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:26:38 -0500,
> wrote:
>
>> I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
>> airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
>> this before?
>
> Just an update... After I rinsed my soybeans I soaked then for several
> hours in franks hot sauce then threw them in the airfryer and they
> turned out quite well. I really enjoyed them over salads.
>

Should have used Melinda's Ghost pepper sauce. Franks is pretty weak.

On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:29:22 -0500, Hank Rogers >
wrote:

wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:26:38 -0500,
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
>>> airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
>>> this before?
>>
>> Just an update... After I rinsed my soybeans I soaked then for several
>> hours in franks hot sauce then threw them in the airfryer and they
>> turned out quite well. I really enjoyed them over salads.
>>
>
>Should have used Melinda's Ghost pepper sauce. Franks is pretty weak.
>
It is not the heat it is the taste. I am fairly sensitive anyway and
can not go too spicy. I have trouble with sriracha sometimes

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:35:53 -0500,
wrote:

>On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:29:22 -0500, Hank Rogers >
>wrote:
>
wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:26:38 -0500,
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
>>>> airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
>>>> this before?
>>>
>>> Just an update... After I rinsed my soybeans I soaked then for several
>>> hours in franks hot sauce then threw them in the airfryer and they
>>> turned out quite well. I really enjoyed them over salads.
>>>
>>
>>Should have used Melinda's Ghost pepper sauce. Franks is pretty weak.
>>
>It is not the heat it is the taste. I am fairly sensitive anyway and
>can not go too spicy. I have trouble with sriracha sometimes

Practice makes perfect.

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:05:28 +1000, Bruce > wrote:

>On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:35:53 -0500,
wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 20 Jun 2020 14:29:22 -0500, Hank Rogers >
>>wrote:
>>
wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 16:26:38 -0500,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have my soybeans soaking now, tomorrow I will throw them in the
>>>>> airfryer. Does anyone have any suggestions if you have maybe tried
>>>>> this before?
>>>>
>>>> Just an update... After I rinsed my soybeans I soaked then for several
>>>> hours in franks hot sauce then threw them in the airfryer and they
>>>> turned out quite well. I really enjoyed them over salads.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Should have used Melinda's Ghost pepper sauce. Franks is pretty weak.
>>>
>>It is not the heat it is the taste. I am fairly sensitive anyway and
>>can not go too spicy. I have trouble with sriracha sometimes
>
>Practice makes perfect.

It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
beer and wine are just disgusting....

OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 14:28:30 -0500,
wrote:

>On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 12:05:28 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 20:35:53 -0500,
wrote:
>>
>>>It is not the heat it is the taste. I am fairly sensitive anyway and
>>>can not go too spicy. I have trouble with sriracha sometimes
>>
>>Practice makes perfect.
>
>It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
>which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
>makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy

You can get used to spiciness, if you want. And then it's no longer in
the way of tasting your food. Chillis actually add flavour, not just
spiciness. Spiciness is only in the way if it's more than you're used
to.

>, thing like beer and wine are just disgusting....

That has nothing to do with being a supertaster. That's just your
personal taste. I bet that some wine experts are supertasters.

On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>
> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
> beer and wine are just disgusting....
>
> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
>
All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
rant, nobody can take away first place from you.

"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.

"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.

"to hot" should be too. You should have learned this in elementary school.

"thing" is things and only one (1) period is needed at the end of the
sentence.

I don't think I can knock you out of first place with getting the most
laughs on this group.

On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:55:28 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
> You can get used to spiciness, if you want. And then it's no longer in
> the way of tasting your food. Chillis actually add flavour, not just
> spiciness. Spiciness is only in the way if it's more than you're used
> to.
>
Thank you.
>
> >, thing like beer and wine are just disgusting....
>
> That has nothing to do with being a supertaster. That's just your
> personal taste. I bet that some wine experts are supertasters.
>
Again, thank you.

On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>
>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
>>
>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
>>
>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
>
>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
>
>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
>
>"to hot" should be too. You should have learned this in elementary school.
>
>"thing" is things and only one (1) period is needed at the end of the
>sentence.
>
>I don't think I can knock you out of first place with getting the most
>laughs on this group.


MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 8:51:17 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
> >I don't think I can knock you out of first place with getting the most
> >laughs on this group.
>
>
> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
>
You're welcome! Now work on your ego so you don't look half as stupid
as we know you are.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> And misplace the U.

Perhaps he is bilingual english-french and was using the french word for
tongue 'langue'.

You made the same mistake a few days ago when you called Julie a 'meth
tweaker' instead on a 'menthe tweaker'.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>
>> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
>>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
>>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
>>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
>>>>
>>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
>>>>
>>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
>>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
>>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
>>>
>>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
>>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
>>>
>>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
>>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
>
>And misplace the U.
>
>Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
>"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
>
>ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
>how super tasting all works.
>
>> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
>
>That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
>sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
>THAT is 'out there'.
>
>And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
>"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
>around in your head.
>
>-sw

a super taster is not a good thing

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:36:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
> >>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
> >>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
> >>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
> >>>>
> >>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
> >>>>
> >>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
> >>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
> >>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
> >>>
> >>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
> >>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
> >>>
> >>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
> >>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
> >
> >And misplace the U.
> >
> >Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
> >"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
> >
> >ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
> >how super tasting all works.
> >
> >> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
> >
> >That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
> >sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
> >THAT is 'out there'.
> >
> >And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
> >"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
> >around in your head.
> >
> >-sw
>
> a super taster is not a good thing

Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?

Cindy Hamilton

On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 9:54:36 AM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>
> > And misplace the U.
>
> Perhaps he is bilingual english-french and was using the french word for
> tongue 'langue'.
>
No, Crusty Kruller is just your garden variety egotistical jerk who thinks
because he doesn't like hot (peppery) foods he's a 'super-taster.'

He's a legend in his own mind.

On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:59:33 AM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:36:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> >
> > a super taster is not a good thing
>
> Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
He didn't have to. He was a manager at Dominos and Papa John's. When
you're made manager on your first day on the job you automatically are
bestowed with the moniker "super-taster." Don't tell me you've forgotten
this already!

;o)

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:21:42 -0700, wrote:

> No, Crusty Kruller is just your garden variety egotistical jerk who
> thinks because he doesn't like hot (peppery) foods he's a
> 'super-taster.'
>
> He's a legend in his own mind.

Despite our misgivings, I suppose an objective tact would be for someone
to ask him he has ever had an independent assessment of his taste sensing
abilities.

I would, but I gather that he deliberately ignores me. This happened ever
since I (over-)reacted to a post where he disparaged the taste of
McDonald's coffee after revealing that instead of drinking coffee, he
prefers a coffee-based beverage with added sugar, milk, chocolate syrup,
and cinnamon.

Cinnamon is paradoxically a 'hot' spice, with quite a pronounced aroma.
Professional coffee tasters do not mix anything with their work, but to
be fair, they are all probably just 'normal' tasters.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_cupping

On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 2:49:21 PM UTC-5, Mike Duffy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 11:21:42 -0700, wrote:
>
> > No, Crusty Kruller is just your garden variety egotistical jerk who
> > thinks because he doesn't like hot (peppery) foods he's a
> > 'super-taster.'
> >
> > He's a legend in his own mind.
>
> Despite our misgivings, I suppose an objective tact would be for someone
> to ask him he has ever had an independent assessment of his taste sensing
> abilities.
>
> I would, but I gather that he deliberately ignores me. This happened ever
> since I (over-)reacted to a post where he disparaged the taste of
> McDonald's coffee after revealing that instead of drinking coffee, he
> prefers a coffee-based beverage with added sugar, milk, chocolate syrup,
> and cinnamon.
>
> Cinnamon is paradoxically a 'hot' spice, with quite a pronounced aroma.
> Professional coffee tasters do not mix anything with their work, but to
> be fair, they are all probably just 'normal' tasters.
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coffee_cupping
>
He's been asked if he's been tested but Crusty self-diagnoses so most
likely you'll never get an honest answer. He's probably too busy using
his air fryer to 'can' pineapple jam/jelly/spread or whatever it is he
concocts.

On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:36:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
>> >>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
>> >>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
>> >>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
>> >>>>
>> >>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
>> >>>>
>> >>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
>> >>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
>> >>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
>> >>>
>> >>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
>> >>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
>> >>>
>> >>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
>> >>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
>> >
>> >And misplace the U.
>> >
>> >Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
>> >"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
>> >
>> >ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
>> >how super tasting all works.
>> >
>> >> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
>> >
>> >That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
>> >sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
>> >THAT is 'out there'.
>> >
>> >And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
>> >"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
>> >around in your head.
>> >
>> >-sw
>>
>> a super taster is not a good thing
>
>Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
>
>Cindy Hamilton

To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
things in common

seriously though the web is out there just go read
https://www.healthline.com/health/fo...-a-supertaster

--

____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 6:52:18 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
> >
> >Cindy Hamilton
>
> To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
> is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
> things in common
>
Created in your on egotistical mind. Yes, there is testing for that,
bird brain.

On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 7:52:18 PM UTC-4, wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:36:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
> >> >>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
> >> >>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
> >> >>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
> >> >>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
> >> >>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
> >> >>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
> >> >>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
> >> >
> >> >And misplace the U.
> >> >
> >> >Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
> >> >"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
> >> >
> >> >ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
> >> >how super tasting all works.
> >> >
> >> >> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
> >> >
> >> >That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
> >> >sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
> >> >THAT is 'out there'.
> >> >
> >> >And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
> >> >"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
> >> >around in your head.
> >> >
> >> >-sw
> >>
> >> a super taster is not a good thing
> >
> >Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
> >
> >Cindy Hamilton
>
> To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
> is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
> things in common

There is a test. Without a test, you're just talking out your
ass.

Cindy Hamilton

On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 1:52:18 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:36:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
> >> >>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
> >> >>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
> >> >>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
> >> >>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
> >> >>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it. You
> >> >>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron..
> >> >>>
> >> >>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
> >> >>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
> >> >
> >> >And misplace the U.
> >> >
> >> >Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
> >> >"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
> >> >
> >> >ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
> >> >how super tasting all works.
> >> >
> >> >> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
> >> >
> >> >That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
> >> >sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
> >> >THAT is 'out there'.
> >> >
> >> >And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
> >> >"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
> >> >around in your head.
> >> >
> >> >-sw
> >>
> >> a super taster is not a good thing
> >
> >Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
> >
> >Cindy Hamilton
>
> To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
> is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
> things in common
>
> seriously though the web is out there just go readIt
> https://www.healthline.com/health/fo...-a-supertaster
>
> --
>
> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____

It seems that being a super taster would kind of suck. My guess is that most of the people here are super tasters because they're so picky and prissy about the foods they eat. I'm probably not a super taster because I like intensely flavored foods. Well that's my guess.

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:39:33 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 1:52:18 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
>> >
>> >Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
>> is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
>> things in common
>>
>> seriously though the web is out there just go readIt
>> https://www.healthline.com/health/fo...-a-supertaster
>>
>> --
>>
>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
>It seems that being a super taster would kind of suck. My guess is that most of the people here are super tasters because they're so picky and prissy about the foods they eat. I'm probably not a super taster because I like intensely flavored foods. Well that's my guess.

You'd think that supertasters don't like fastfood. They can taste the
haste and the animal suffering, I'm sure.

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 20:46:40 +1000, Bruce > wrote:

>On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 03:39:33 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:
>
>>On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 1:52:18 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>>> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
>>> >
>>> >Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
>>> is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
>>> things in common
>>>
>>> seriously though the web is out there just go readIt
>>> https://www.healthline.com/health/fo...-a-supertaster
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>>
>>It seems that being a super taster would kind of suck. My guess is that most of the people here are super tasters because they're so picky and prissy about the foods they eat. I'm probably not a super taster because I like intensely flavored foods. Well that's my guess.
>
>You'd think that supertasters don't like fastfood. They can taste the
>haste and the animal suffering, I'm sure.

And the additives! Time for an ingredient list. It's been weeks!

On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 6:39:37 AM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, June 25, 2020 at 1:52:18 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 09:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 at 11:36:23 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> > >> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 04:44:02 -0500, Sqwertz >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> >> On Tue, 23 Jun 2020 13:07:44 -0700 (PDT), "
> > >> >> > wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>On Tuesday, June 23, 2020 at 2:28:35 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> It is not practice. I have mentioned before that I am a super taster
> > >> >>>> which just means that I have more taste buds on my lounge and that
> > >> >>>> makes things like spicy foods just way to hot to enjoy, thing like
> > >> >>>> beer and wine are just disgusting....
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> OK joan go on your little rant so we can all laugh at you...
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>All I'm going to ask about this stupid, self-serving post is do you ever
> > >> >>>proof-read the garbage you splatter on this group? No need for me to
> > >> >>>rant, nobody can take away first place from you.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>"Super taster" what a joke; super conceited idiot is more like it.. You
> > >> >>>don't like hot food, that doesn't make you a 'super-taster.' Moron.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>"lounge" I suppose that idiotic mistake is actually tongue and if it
> > >> >>>was it was spelled wrong if you were going to substitute that l for a t.
> > >> >
> > >> >And misplace the U.
> > >> >
> > >> >Yes, the whole idea of him NOT liking foods because he's a
> > >> >"super-taster" is the exact opposite of a super-taster.
> > >> >
> > >> >ChristKiller needs to watch the movie "Perfume" to get an idea of
> > >> >how super tasting all works.
> > >> >
> > >> >> MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!! This chick if really out there!!
> > >> >
> > >> >That beats me at dickheadedness every day. I can be pretty curt
> > >> >sometimes, but something like that never, or would, occur to me.
> > >> >THAT is 'out there'.
> > >> >
> > >> >And please know that everybody (really - EVERYBODY) here agrees with
> > >> >"this chick". You're only entertaining the little people dancing
> > >> >around in your head.
> > >> >
> > >> >-sw
> > >>
> > >> a super taster is not a good thing
> > >
> > >Did you undergo testing to confirm you're a super taster?
> > >
> > >Cindy Hamilton
> >
> > To my knowledge there is no testing for this as the term super taster
> > is more of a socially created idea. All supertaster's have a few
> > things in common
> >
> > seriously though the web is out there just go readIt
> > https://www.healthline.com/health/fo...-a-supertaster
> >
> > --
> >
> > ____/~~~sine qua non~~~\____
>
> It seems that being a super taster would kind of suck. My guess is that most of the people here are super tasters because they're so picky and prissy about the foods they eat. I'm probably not a super taster because I like intensely flavored foods. Well that's my guess.

No, most of the people here are not supertasters.

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supertaster#Specific_food_sensitivities>

I like intensely flavored foods AND I'm picky and prissy about what I eat.

Cindy Hamilton

On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 05:41:27 -0700, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supertaster#Specific_food_sensitivities>


Oh good, you found an unbiased description where 'supertasting' is
described in a more analytical manner. Now, we can simply ask him if he
can taste Phenylthiocarbamide or Propylthiouracil.


What I find interesting(?) are the 2 new terms 'medium tasters' (50% of
populace) and 'non-tasters'(25% of the populace). (End 'History' section.)

On 2020 Jun 26, , Mike Duffy wrote
(in article >):

> What I find interesting(?) are the 2 new terms 'medium tasters' (50% of
> populace) and 'non-tasters'(25% of the populace). (End 'History' section.)

What I find interesting is that some self-styled €œexperts" foist the
super-taster idea at you as a serious science. Then they create offices to
test if you are, tell you the results, and start making money out of thin
air. Im starting to feel absolutely holistic about this. Quack, quack,
quack, quack, quack.

leo

On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:03:03 -0700, Leo >
wrote:

>On 2020 Jun 26, , Mike Duffy wrote
>(in article >):
>
>> What I find interesting(?) are the 2 new terms 'medium tasters' (50% of
>> populace) and 'non-tasters'(25% of the populace). (End 'History' section.)
>
>What I find interesting is that some self-styled €œexperts" foist the
>super-taster idea at you as a serious science. Then they create offices to
>test if you are, tell you the results, and start making money out of thin
>air. Im starting to feel absolutely holistic about this. Quack, quack,
>quack, quack, quack.

Who knows. I mean, when I read your political ideas, I can't help but
think you're a super-thinker.

On 2020 Jun 27, , Bruce wrote
(in >):

> Who knows. I mean, when I read your political ideas, I can't help but
> think you're a super-thinker.

I wish! Im an ordinary cynic...well, maybe a super-cynic.

On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 4:02:05 AM UTC-4, Leo wrote:
> On 2020 Jun 26, , Mike Duffy wrote
> (in article >):
>
> > What I find interesting(?) are the 2 new terms 'medium tasters' (50% of
> > populace) and 'non-tasters'(25% of the populace). (End 'History' section.)
>
> What I find interesting is that some self-styled €œexperts" foist the
> super-taster idea at you as a serious science. Then they create offices to
> test if you are, tell you the results, and start making money out of thin
> air. Im starting to feel absolutely holistic about this. Quack, quack,
> quack, quack, quack.
>
> leo

"No one in this world, so far as I know€”and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me€”has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people.."

--H.L. Mencken

On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:03:03 -0700, Leo wrote:

> On 2020 Jun 26, , Mike Duffy wrote (in article
> >):
>
>> What I find interesting(?) are the 2 new terms 'medium tasters' (50% of
>> populace) and 'non-tasters'(25% of the populace). (End 'History'
>> section.)
>
> What I find interesting is that some self-styled €œexperts" foist the
> super-taster idea at you as a serious science. Then they create offices
> to test if you are, tell you the results, and start making money out of
> thin air. Im starting to feel absolutely holistic about this. Quack,
> quack, quack, quack, quack.

Leo, I'm just starting to realize that I'm actually a super-****er. As my
doctor, I want you to set up some clinical trials. Make sure the nurses
are all wearing hospital pyjamas.

On 2020-06-27 4:28 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 4:02:05 AM UTC-4, Leo wrote:

>
> "No one in this world, so far as I know€”and I have searched the records for years, and employed agents to help me€”has ever lost money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of the plain people."
>
> --H.L. Mencken
>
Certainly proved by some citizens of Palm Beach:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaFSH0K4BdQ

graham wrote:

> On 2020-06-27 4:28 a.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 4:02:05 AM UTC-4, Leo wrote:
>
> >
> > "No one in this world, so far as I know€”and I have searched the
> > records for years, and employed agents to help me€”has ever lost
> > money by underestimating the intelligence of the great masses of
> > the plain people."
> >
> > --H.L. Mencken
> >
> Certainly proved by some citizens of Palm Beach:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DaFSH0K4BdQ

And they walk among us... For a little bit at least as Darwin will get
them.

On 2020 Jun 27, , Mike Duffy wrote
(in article >):

> Leo, I'm just starting to realize that I'm actually a super-****er. As my
> doctor, I want you to set up some clinical trials. Make sure the nurses
> are all wearing hospital pyjamas.

Not a problem, Mike. Im soliciting €œinvestors€� now for start-up
costs and am shopping for an office to use for eight hours. Is that enough?
Nurses should be available from nearby brothels, and they will wear
whatever you want for cash. Im searching online to quickly acquire a
cheap M.D. degree.
Alas, your wishes will be expensive, although Im doing my best to keep
costs down. There will be people to pay, machines to make the rented office
look like a doctors office, one or two extra beds and, of course,
permits. Then, all thats left is my considerable renumeration.
But well make it happen, Captain! Ill keep you posted.

leo

On Saturday, June 27, 2020 at 3:09:23 AM UTC-10, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2020 01:03:03 -0700, Leo wrote:
>
> > On 2020 Jun 26, , Mike Duffy wrote (in article
> > >):
> >
> >> What I find interesting(?) are the 2 new terms 'medium tasters' (50% of
> >> populace) and 'non-tasters'(25% of the populace). (End 'History'
> >> section.)
> >
> > What I find interesting is that some self-styled €œexperts" foist the
> > super-taster idea at you as a serious science. Then they create offices
> > to test if you are, tell you the results, and start making money out of
> > thin air. Im starting to feel absolutely holistic about this. Quack,
> > quack, quack, quack, quack.
>
> Leo, I'm just starting to realize that I'm actually a super-****er. As my
> doctor, I want you to set up some clinical trials. Make sure the nurses
> are all wearing hospital pyjamas.

When my wife was going to nursing school, they went to their training in nice white form-fitting uniforms and white stockings. By the time she was done, the nurses were wearing scrubs. Oh, cruel fate! I can't say there's a God, but I know the Devil exists.

On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 21:58:24 -0700, Leo wrote:

> On 2020 Jun 27, , Mike Duffy wrote (in article
> >):

> Im searching online to quickly acquire a cheap M.D. degree.
> [...]
> But well make it happen, Captain! Ill keep you posted.

I just had a virtual brainstorm! I'm going to empty out my kill-file. The
only person in it is actually a real doctor! Actually he is *two* doctors:

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD. He's the pioneer in starvation therapy who is
always talking about being "wonderfully hungry". All we need to do is
convince him that I am "wonderfully horny".