 |
|
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Smith > wrote:
Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD BLOOD? Stay in canada MORON! > Nancy Dooley wrote: > > > The man has been in the U.S. for 20 years and served in the Army - > > hard to believe he doesn't recognize the concept of private property. > > In addition, he was hunting in Wisconsin with a Minnesota license. > > > > Now he's saying that (1) someone shot at him first, and (2) it was an > > ethnic thing ... convenient, isn't it, and isn't it funny how fast > > someone figures out they can play a discrimination or hate card > > without even thinking about it, and officials and victims figuratively > > back off. The survivors' take on the incident will be interesting. > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > done anything like that. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith > wrote:
Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD BLOOD? Stay in canada MORON! > Nancy Dooley wrote: > > > The man has been in the U.S. for 20 years and served in the Army - > > hard to believe he doesn't recognize the concept of private property. > > In addition, he was hunting in Wisconsin with a Minnesota license. > > > > Now he's saying that (1) someone shot at him first, and (2) it was an > > ethnic thing ... convenient, isn't it, and isn't it funny how fast > > someone figures out they can play a discrimination or hate card > > without even thinking about it, and officials and victims figuratively > > back off. The survivors' take on the incident will be interesting. > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > done anything like that. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote:
> Dave Smith > wrote: > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > BLOOD? > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > > done anything like that. Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too dense to realize the sarcasm of that. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote:
> > Dave Smith > wrote: > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. I believe Dave was kidding. nancy (bad snipping due to someone's top posting) |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote:
> > Dave Smith > wrote: > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. I believe Dave was kidding. nancy (bad snipping due to someone's top posting) |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
PENMART01 wrote:
> My property is well POSTED, as are all my neighbors, no one permits hunting > along this entire road. <snip> Well, I think that's a fairly narrow minded view of the total picture, but it's your property and your call obviously. I hope that you don't get to the point where we are in Dutchess county where you see deer starving to death or being chased by coyotes or dogs in the winter due to over population. It's a much more gruesome sight than hunting by responsible people. > > > Hmm, sure sounds like you're putting down appartment dwellers... tsk tsk > > Last hunting season I spotted a few people from my kitchen window way out in in > my back hayfield... the funniest thing you ever saw is fat *******s all decked > out in hunting gear bogged down in frozen hay trying to outrun a Landcruiser... > one of them even begged me to let him retrieve the rifle he dropped. > Ahahahahahahaha. . . . People who don't know how to respect others property, ask permission, etc deserve what they get. -- Steve Who was the first person to say, "See that chicken there... I'm gonna eat the next thing that comes outta it's ass?" |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
PENMART01 wrote:
> My property is well POSTED, as are all my neighbors, no one permits hunting > along this entire road. <snip> Well, I think that's a fairly narrow minded view of the total picture, but it's your property and your call obviously. I hope that you don't get to the point where we are in Dutchess county where you see deer starving to death or being chased by coyotes or dogs in the winter due to over population. It's a much more gruesome sight than hunting by responsible people. > > > Hmm, sure sounds like you're putting down appartment dwellers... tsk tsk > > Last hunting season I spotted a few people from my kitchen window way out in in > my back hayfield... the funniest thing you ever saw is fat *******s all decked > out in hunting gear bogged down in frozen hay trying to outrun a Landcruiser... > one of them even begged me to let him retrieve the rifle he dropped. > Ahahahahahahaha. . . . People who don't know how to respect others property, ask permission, etc deserve what they get. -- Steve Who was the first person to say, "See that chicken there... I'm gonna eat the next thing that comes outta it's ass?" |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith > wrote:
> The Wolf wrote: > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > > BLOOD? > > > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > > > done anything like that. > > Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too dense to realize the > sarcasm of that. I need to see the entire post to determine if I was hoodwinked. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote:
> Dave Smith > wrote: > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > > > > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > > > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > > > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > > > > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > > > > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO > > MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > > > > BLOOD? > > > > > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > > > > > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > > > > done anything like that. > > > > Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too > dense to realize the > > sarcasm of that. > > I need to see the entire post to determine if I was hoodwinked. You need to see the entire post to see if you were hoodwinked. Holy shit Wolf. It was two sentences, a mere 18 word response. It should not have taken more than a few seconds even if you had to move your lips to read it. I would suggest that even a moron should be able to see that it was sarcastic, but you would have proved me wrong. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote:
> Dave Smith > wrote: > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > > > > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > > > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > > > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > > > > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > > > > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO > > MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > > > > BLOOD? > > > > > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > > > > > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > > > > done anything like that. > > > > Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too > dense to realize the > > sarcasm of that. > > I need to see the entire post to determine if I was hoodwinked. You need to see the entire post to see if you were hoodwinked. Holy shit Wolf. It was two sentences, a mere 18 word response. It should not have taken more than a few seconds even if you had to move your lips to read it. I would suggest that even a moron should be able to see that it was sarcastic, but you would have proved me wrong. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Graphic Queen wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:57:45 -0500, Steve Calvin > > wrote: > > >>PENMART01 wrote: >> >>>My property is well POSTED, as are all my neighbors, no one permits hunting >>>along this entire road. >> >><snip> >> >>Well, I think that's a fairly narrow minded view of the total picture, >>but it's your property and your call obviously. I hope that you don't >>get to the point where we are in Dutchess county where you see deer >>starving to death or being chased by coyotes or dogs in the winter due >>to over population. It's a much more gruesome sight than hunting by >>responsible people. > > > I think you have a narrow view of people's private property rights. It > the person who owns said land to decide whether to allow any hunting. > We used to own over 100 acres in Missouri and we allowed friends to > hunt and we hunted but we had to constantly patrol the acreage because > of people who thought they had some sort of right to hunt wherever > they chose no matter if it was private property or not. And how do you > know he doesn't hunt his own property? You should really read the entire post before going off half cocked... Read on to what I said. Do I need to point it out to you? It's about three lines down. >> >>People who don't know how to respect others property, ask permission, >>etc deserve what they get. > -- Steve Who was the first person to say, "See that chicken there... I'm gonna eat the next thing that comes outta it's ass?" |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith > wrote:
> The Wolf wrote: > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > > > > > > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > > > > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > > > > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > > > > > > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > > > > > > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO > > > > MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > > > > > > BLOOD? > > > > > > > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not have > > > > > done anything like that. > > > > > > Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too > > dense to realize the > > > sarcasm of that. > > > > I need to see the entire post to determine if I was hoodwinked. > > You need to see the entire post to see if you were hoodwinked. H oly shit Wolf. It > was two sentences, a mere 18 word response. It should not have aken more than a few > seconds even if you had to move your lips to read it. I would suggest that even a > moron should be able to see that it was sarcastic, ut you would have proved me > wrong. One must posess a sense of humor to be sarcastic, that's why in your case it is NOT possible.......... |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote: > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > > > > > > > > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > > > > > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > > > > > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > > > > > > > > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > > > > > > > > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO > > > > > > MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > > > > > > > > BLOOD? > > > > > > > > > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not > have > > > > > > done anything like that. > > > > > > > > Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too > > > dense to realize the > > > > sarcasm of that. > > > > > > I need to see the entire post to determine if I was hoodwinked. > > > > You need to see the entire post to see if you were hoodwinked. H > oly shit Wolf. It > > was two sentences, a mere 18 word response. It should not have > aken more than a few > > seconds even if you had to move your lips to read it. > I would suggest that even a > > moron should be able to see that it was sarcastic, > ut you would have proved me > > wrong. > > One must posess a sense of humor to be sarcastic, that's why in your > case it is NOT possible.......... Well I guess the secret is out. It is true that I have been described as one of those who does not suffer fools kindly. Your idiocy has provided immense comedy for me. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
The Wolf wrote: > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > > The Wolf wrote: > > > > > > > > > Dave Smith > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Here's why I feel compelled to call you liberals STUPID! > > > > > > > > > > Their are FIVE people who can't give THEIR side of the story to THEIR > > > > > Brothers. Some public defender with jism on his or her iips PLANTED that > > > > > story AND stupid Fu7ks like yourelves are taking it hook line & sinker. > > > > > > > > > > Worst case scenario; someone called him a name..... > > > > > > > > > > IN YOUR OPINION THAT GIVES HIM THE RIGHT TO > > > > > > MURDER FIVE PEOPLE IN COLD > > > > > > > > BLOOD? > > > > > > > > > > Stay in canada MORON! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't think he did it. His brother told reporters that he would not > have > > > > > > done anything like that. > > > > > > > > Well Wolfy, it would appear that you were the only one too > > > dense to realize the > > > > sarcasm of that. > > > > > > I need to see the entire post to determine if I was hoodwinked. > > > > You need to see the entire post to see if you were hoodwinked. H > oly shit Wolf. It > > was two sentences, a mere 18 word response. It should not have > aken more than a few > > seconds even if you had to move your lips to read it. > I would suggest that even a > > moron should be able to see that it was sarcastic, > ut you would have proved me > > wrong. > > One must posess a sense of humor to be sarcastic, that's why in your > case it is NOT possible.......... Well I guess the secret is out. It is true that I have been described as one of those who does not suffer fools kindly. Your idiocy has provided immense comedy for me. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith wrote:
> I would suggest that even a moron should be able to see that it was > sarcastic, but you would have proved me wrong. > > Some people can only hope to be a moron someday. Bob |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
jmcquown wrote:
> What the hell is *this* rant about? You got a problem with vegetarians? > (No, I'm not one.) I doubt seriously if getting attacked by a savage dog > would bring about a change to a vegetarian's diet. Just how much have you > had to drink? Jill.. I never realized you were that dense. ~john |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
jmcquown wrote:
> What the hell is *this* rant about? You got a problem with vegetarians? > (No, I'm not one.) I doubt seriously if getting attacked by a savage dog > would bring about a change to a vegetarian's diet. Just how much have you > had to drink? Jill.. I never realized you were that dense. ~john |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dog3 wrote:
> Sheldon, do you ever get poachers on your farm? I'm sure you probably > don't allow hunting on your property. Inexperienced hunters can be very > dangerous. Michael... When you were sick, Sheldon wished your death would come soon since "All ass ****ing faggots DESERVE AIDS". Why do you continue with such a positive attitude towards him? ~john |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith wrote:
> It is incidents like this one and the one in which I was shot by a stupid > hunter, as opposed to a responsible hunter, that I am in favor of gun control > regulations. > If it were not for the existing gun regulations, some of the folks would probably have been wearing sidearms -- so they would not have been defenseless against the lunatic. As it was, he shot the one guy that had a rifle, and then the rest were easy pickings. The ones on the ATV that came to their aid (and were shot) probably left their rifles and shotguns behind at the cabin because they thought they were coming to an accidental shooting. If they had had handguns with them, they might have had a chance. Guns don't kill people, gun control regulations do. Bob |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Levelwave© wrote:
> Dog3 wrote: > >> Sheldon, do you ever get poachers on your farm? I'm sure you probably >> don't allow hunting on your property. Inexperienced hunters can be >> very dangerous. > > > Michael... When you were sick, Sheldon wished your death would come soon > since "All ass ****ing faggots DESERVE AIDS". Why do you continue with > such a positive attitude towards him? > > ~john That's what separates people of great character from the rodents of life. jim |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote: > > >>>It is incidents like this one and the one in which I was shot by a stupid >>>hunter, as opposed to a responsible hunter, that I am in favor of gun control >>>regulations. >>> >> >>If it were not for the existing gun regulations, some of the folks would >>probably have been wearing sidearms -- so they would not have been >>defenseless against the lunatic. As it was, he shot the one guy that >>had a rifle, and then the rest were easy pickings. >> > > > Just like in the good old days when shoot-outs were almost a form of recreation, > which led to gun controls. > > > >>The ones on the ATV that came to their aid (and were shot) probably left >>their rifles and shotguns behind at the cabin because they thought they >>were coming to an accidental shooting. If they had had handguns with >>them, they might have had a chance. > > > Against a rifle at a distance? > You would rather they had no chance? Bob |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Smith wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote: > > >>>It is incidents like this one and the one in which I was shot by a stupid >>>hunter, as opposed to a responsible hunter, that I am in favor of gun control >>>regulations. >>> >> >>If it were not for the existing gun regulations, some of the folks would >>probably have been wearing sidearms -- so they would not have been >>defenseless against the lunatic. As it was, he shot the one guy that >>had a rifle, and then the rest were easy pickings. >> > > > Just like in the good old days when shoot-outs were almost a form of recreation, > which led to gun controls. > > > >>The ones on the ATV that came to their aid (and were shot) probably left >>their rifles and shotguns behind at the cabin because they thought they >>were coming to an accidental shooting. If they had had handguns with >>them, they might have had a chance. > > > Against a rifle at a distance? > You would rather they had no chance? Bob |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:07:07 -0500, "C. James Strutz"
> scribbled some thoughts: > >"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message .. . >> On 22 Nov 2004 15:43:43 GMT, (PENMART01) > >> Time to play the Devil's Advocate: Wouldn't it be >> hillarious if your spouse/mother/father/brother/sister/child >> was shot in just such a manner? Why is it excellent? When >> an issue like this does not hit close to home, people make >> light of it, but when it hits close to home, or home, >> feelings change. > >True. > >> I wonder how long a vegetarian would stay a vegetarian if a >> savage dog attacked him/her, or they were out camping miles >> from nowhere, or their plane went down and it was in the >> middle of nowhere. > >You need to know that there are different kinds of vegetarians. Not all >vegetarians are vegan (strict "ethical" vegetarians who choose not to >support animal exploitation through diet and lifestyle). Some vegetarians >choose not to eat meat and/or dairy and/or eggs for health, environmental, >or religious reasons among others. Please do not generalize all vegetarians >together. > Vegetarian (Veggie Vegan PETA) Lacto vegetarians (Dairy and Veggie/Fruit Vegans) Lacto-ovo vegetarians (Dairy, Veggie and Egg Vegans) Seventh Day Adventists Vegetarians with a twist: Orthodox Jews: Must be kosher Orthodox Muslims: Must be hilal Basically the two above, if it's good for one it's good for the other if there is no other choice. Wasn't meant to generalize. >> Some vegetation can kill a person, some >> animals can kill a person if bitten, but rarely if eaten, >> the possible exception being rabbit as eating too much in a >> survival situation would cause one to be dehydrated. Does >> the vegetarian try to find edible plants? What if there >> aren't any that they can find? Wait it out, or does the >> gene that makes the self preservation kick in and one >> devises a way to trap an animal, kill it then eat it? > >Smart people usually don't put themselves in that sort of situation. When I >go to the backwoods I usually take the necessary precautions to get me >through safely, including enough food and water. It's actually pretty hard >these days to find a place where you are truely lost to the point where >survivability is an issue. However, it could happen and if it did then the >circumstances and will of the persons involved will dictate the outcome. >It's too hard to speculate on something like that. > >> Plants "eat" animals when the animals die, via their roots, >> so even vegetarians are true vegetarians, for they are Above line should read: " so even vegetarians aren't true vegetarians, " >> eating animals once removed. > >Sigh, please THINK about what you're writing. > Wasn't the first, actually got that from Spock/Leonard Nimoy, I believe it was the Eden/Garden of Eden episode? >> Personally, I see no reason to go hunting, when there are >> farms which raise animals to be slaughtered. > >How about the severe deer overpopulations all over the country? Or some less >fortunate people who find it difficult to afford meat from a grocery store? >Or the increasing threats of food-borne illnesses from commercial food >processing/handling? Or the antibiotics, steroids, growth hormones, etc. >that factory farms typically feed to grain-fed cattle? Or the increasing >evidence linking saturated fats found in commercial meats to heart disease >and cancer? There are a few reasons for you. > >> Still, in a >> survival situation, I'd trap an animal, or if lucky enough >> find some black walnuts in husks and find a pool off a creek >> with fish in it and to save the energy of expending to catch >> the fish, drop a walnut and husk in the water: the fish from >> what I've read will rise the the surface ready to be caught >> and eaten, the husk has a toxin which will kill fish. So >> ideally one would not want to go overboard, or one could >> design a fish trap that funnels the fish in, but they don't >> seem to find the way out at the center. > >More than likely you'll be eating insects, worms, inner tree bark and any >other food source you can find. Walnuts and trout streams aren't always >convenient. :^) > Depends on your locale. :-) -- Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font | (©) (©) Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------ d(-_-)b | /// \\\ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 11:49:01 -0500, Steve Calvin
> scribbled some thoughts: >C. James Strutz wrote: > >> >> Smart people usually don't put themselves in that sort of situation. When I >> go to the backwoods I usually take the necessary precautions to get me >> through safely, including enough food and water. It's actually pretty hard >> these days to find a place where you are truely lost to the point where >> survivability is an issue. However, it could happen and if it did then the >> circumstances and will of the persons involved will dictate the outcome. >> It's too hard to speculate on something like that. >> > >Actually, it's not really all that difficult to get "turned around" in >most stands of timber, especially if it's very thick. That's why I >bought a good GPS and always carry spare/fresh batteries. I haven't >*had* to rely on it yet but it's nice to know I have it. (with waypoints >marked of course) I'd trust more in a compass and map, or at least a compass. Definitely know the principles of a sun cumpass. No compass or map? Follow streams to where they empty you'll find civilization. Then again, unless you're there, it's easy to be an armchair quarterback. -- Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font | (©) (©) Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------ d(-_-)b | /// \\\ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:56:01 -0500, Nancy Young
> scribbled some thoughts: >Steve Calvin wrote: > >> Actually, it's not really all that difficult to get "turned around" in >> most stands of timber, especially if it's very thick. That's why I >> bought a good GPS and always carry spare/fresh batteries. I haven't >> *had* to rely on it yet but it's nice to know I have it. (with waypoints >> marked of course) > >Man, one time I missed a marker on Mt. Washington. No trees, just >rock piles you're supposed to follow. We were hiking down and >wound up on the road above treeline. (bad words deleted) Had to >hike back up to the last marker (I know they have a name). Bad Cairn? cairn \"karn, "kern\ noun [ME (Sc) carne, fr. ScGael carn; akin to OIr & W carn cairn] (15c) : a heap of stones piled up as a memorial or as a landmark cairned \"karnd, "kernd\ adjective (C)1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All rights reserved. >enough we had miles to go to the bottom, I sure didn't need the >extra mile/whatever. But at least I knew, head down. Little >different in the forest. Still, I'd just read the list of names >of people who'd died hiking on the mountain due to sudden bad >weather, and sure enough, it got a little shaky for a while. > Ooooh. Mt. Weather, only for the really brave or crazy. Be prepared for the worst, hope for the best and STILL prepare for the worst. If I were to thru-hike the AT, I think I'd steer clear of it, unless it was "my time". >I also once got completely turned around in a state park. How >embarrassing is that. It was getting dark, that was scary. >Where's a park ranger when you need them? (laugh) I coulda >used a good Mounty. > >nancy Thick woods, no landmarks and you can get lost, especially in the south. -- Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font | (©) (©) Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------ d(-_-)b | /// \\\ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
A terrible tragedy,we should take a very close look at our
immigration policies. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
We allow hunters only by written permssion and only those we have
known for a long time.NO drinking allowed,do it and lose it. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Graphic Queen > writes:
> I think you have a narrow view of people's private property rights. It > the person who owns said land to decide whether to allow any hunting. > We used to own over 100 acres in Missouri and we allowed friends to > hunt and we hunted but we had to constantly patrol the acreage because > of people who thought they had some sort of right to hunt wherever > they chose no matter if it was private property or not. The standards vary from area to area... In New Hampshire, you have the de facto right (hundreds of years of common law) to hike, fish, and hunt on private property unless it is properly posted, as long as you are obeying other laws. I own a patch of rural NH forest (with my house in it), and it's now posted, ever since I had to talk to a hunter about his lack of common sense (hunting too close to the house) and he responded with threats about "having a bigger gun" than I did. Too bad, since most of the hunters around here are reasonably responsible (and hunters I know personally I still let hunt on and pass through the land). But when someone threatens me with a weapon on my own land, I'd rather not have deal with those issues any more. And I won't think about un-posting the land, since the response of some of the local hunters is to get ****ed off and tear down the signs... -- Richard W Kaszeta http://www.kaszeta.org/rich |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Graphic Queen > writes:
> I think you have a narrow view of people's private property rights. It > the person who owns said land to decide whether to allow any hunting. > We used to own over 100 acres in Missouri and we allowed friends to > hunt and we hunted but we had to constantly patrol the acreage because > of people who thought they had some sort of right to hunt wherever > they chose no matter if it was private property or not. The standards vary from area to area... In New Hampshire, you have the de facto right (hundreds of years of common law) to hike, fish, and hunt on private property unless it is properly posted, as long as you are obeying other laws. I own a patch of rural NH forest (with my house in it), and it's now posted, ever since I had to talk to a hunter about his lack of common sense (hunting too close to the house) and he responded with threats about "having a bigger gun" than I did. Too bad, since most of the hunters around here are reasonably responsible (and hunters I know personally I still let hunt on and pass through the land). But when someone threatens me with a weapon on my own land, I'd rather not have deal with those issues any more. And I won't think about un-posting the land, since the response of some of the local hunters is to get ****ed off and tear down the signs... -- Richard W Kaszeta http://www.kaszeta.org/rich |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
T wrote:
> We allow hunters only by written permssion and only those we have > known for a long time.NO drinking allowed,do it and lose it. > Ever had one of them shoot you (and your daughter and a bunch of your other friends and relatives) when you told them to leave? That appears to be what happened in WI. The landowner was the first one shot by the tresspasser. Bob |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Any mushroom hunters here? REC wild mushroom ragout | General Cooking | |||
| Hunters of Wild Primate Meat Get New Retroviriii | Vegan | |||
| Fwd: Bambi (5) 6 ----- Hunters 0 | General Cooking | |||
| Bambi 5 ----- Hunters 0 | General Cooking | |||
Linear Mode
