Never anonymous Bud wrote:

> Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, Allan Matthews
> > on Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:55:43 GMT spoke:
>
>
> WHAT does this thread have to do with cooking??
>
>

While hunting for venison, their geese got cooked.

So there.

---jbk

--
"Bam!"
-- Bam-Bam Rubble

Jeff Bienstadt wrote:

> Never anonymous Bud wrote:
>
>
>>Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, Allan Matthews
> on Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:55:43 GMT spoke:
>>
>>
>>WHAT does this thread have to do with cooking??
>>
>>
>
>
> While hunting for venison, their geese got cooked.
>
> So there.
>
> ---jbk
>
rotf Hold off on those kinda cracks though Jeff. I'm headed for Pa.
for whitetail next week! lol

--
Steve

Who was the first person to say, "See that chicken there... I'm gonna
eat the next thing that comes outta it's ass?"

Jeff Bienstadt wrote:

> Never anonymous Bud wrote:
>
>
>>Trying to steal the thunder from Arnold, Allan Matthews
> on Wed, 24 Nov 2004 12:55:43 GMT spoke:
>>
>>
>>WHAT does this thread have to do with cooking??
>>
>>
>
>
> While hunting for venison, their geese got cooked.
>
> So there.
>
> ---jbk
>
rotf Hold off on those kinda cracks though Jeff. I'm headed for Pa.
for whitetail next week! lol

--
Steve

Who was the first person to say, "See that chicken there... I'm gonna
eat the next thing that comes outta it's ass?"

Levelwave© > wrote in
:

> Dog3 wrote:
>
>> Sheldon, do you ever get poachers on your farm? I'm sure you
>> probably don't allow hunting on your property. Inexperienced hunters
>> can be very dangerous.
>
> Michael... When you were sick, Sheldon wished your death would come
> soon since "All ass ****ing faggots DESERVE AIDS". Why do you continue
> with such a positive attitude towards him?
>
> ~john
>

Because I did not know he posted this. I had no idea he was a homophobe.

Michael

Levelwave© > wrote in
:

> Dog3 wrote:
>
>> Sheldon, do you ever get poachers on your farm? I'm sure you
>> probably don't allow hunting on your property. Inexperienced hunters
>> can be very dangerous.
>
> Michael... When you were sick, Sheldon wished your death would come
> soon since "All ass ****ing faggots DESERVE AIDS". Why do you continue
> with such a positive attitude towards him?
>
> ~john
>

Because I did not know he posted this. I had no idea he was a homophobe.

Michael

JimLane > wrote in
:

> Levelwave© wrote:
>> Dog3 wrote:
>>
>>> Sheldon, do you ever get poachers on your farm? I'm sure you
>>> probably don't allow hunting on your property. Inexperienced
>>> hunters can be very dangerous.
>>
>>
>> Michael... When you were sick, Sheldon wished your death would come
>> soon since "All ass ****ing faggots DESERVE AIDS". Why do you
>> continue with such a positive attitude towards him?
>>
>> ~john
>
>
> That's what separates people of great character from the rodents of
> life.
>
>
> jim
>

I agree. Why lower yourself to those types of standards?

Michael

Graphic Queen wrote:

> >That's curious because a recent report says that the survivor claims that one
> >of the victims did fire, but that he shot after the trespasser shot first.
> >
> Well, it wouldn't be the first time an accused person lied! I have no
> idea since I wasn't there, but I heard the last news report they had
> here said that the rifle hadn't been shot. I am sure that the cops
> there would check to see if the rifle had been fired. Doesn't take a
> college education to figure that one out. I suppose we will hear more
> later after the police have done their investigation.

Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded told
police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot at them. I
agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person lied. Nor would it
be the first time that a witness would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the
first time that a news source lied, especially FOX.

Graphic Queen wrote:

> >That's curious because a recent report says that the survivor claims that one
> >of the victims did fire, but that he shot after the trespasser shot first.
> >
> Well, it wouldn't be the first time an accused person lied! I have no
> idea since I wasn't there, but I heard the last news report they had
> here said that the rifle hadn't been shot. I am sure that the cops
> there would check to see if the rifle had been fired. Doesn't take a
> college education to figure that one out. I suppose we will hear more
> later after the police have done their investigation.

Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded told
police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot at them. I
agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person lied. Nor would it
be the first time that a witness would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the
first time that a news source lied, especially FOX.

Dave Smith > wrote:

> Graphic Queen wrote:
>
> > >That's curious because a recent report says that the survivor claims
> > that one >of the victims did fire, but that he shot after the trespasser
> > shot first. > Well, it wouldn't be the first time an accused person
> > lied! I have no idea since I wasn't there, but I heard the last news
> > report they had here said that the rifle hadn't been shot. I am sure
> > that the cops there would check to see if the rifle had been fired.
> > Doesn't take a college education to figure that one out. I suppose we
> > will hear more later after the police have done their investigation.
>
> Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded
> told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot
> at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person
> lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness would lie. For that
> matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news source lied, especially
> FOX.

I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?

Dave Smith > wrote:

> Graphic Queen wrote:
>
> > >That's curious because a recent report says that the survivor claims
> > that one >of the victims did fire, but that he shot after the trespasser
> > shot first. > Well, it wouldn't be the first time an accused person
> > lied! I have no idea since I wasn't there, but I heard the last news
> > report they had here said that the rifle hadn't been shot. I am sure
> > that the cops there would check to see if the rifle had been fired.
> > Doesn't take a college education to figure that one out. I suppose we
> > will hear more later after the police have done their investigation.
>
> Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded
> told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot
> at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person
> lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness would lie. For that
> matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news source lied, especially
> FOX.

I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?

No,the hunters who are given permission to hunt our land,are well
known old friends,don't give permission to unknown strangers and were
never approached by any.

No,the hunters who are given permission to hunt our land,are well
known old friends,don't give permission to unknown strangers and were
never approached by any.

No,the hunters who are given permission to hunt our land,are well
known old friends,don't give permission to unknown strangers and were
never approached by any.

Well,get ready for a lot of others.
http://snipurl.com/at97

Well,get ready for a lot of others.
http://snipurl.com/at97

The Wolf wrote:

>
> > Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the wounded
> > told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but after he shot
> > at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that an accused person
> > lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness would lie. For that
> > matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news source lied, especially
> > FOX.
>
> I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
> read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?

Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I won't
bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to research it on
the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what really happened. Most
people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do they consider it to be a
reliable source for news.

Dave Smith > wrote:

> The Wolf wrote:
>
> >
> > > Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
> > > wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
> > > after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
> > > an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
> > > would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
> > > source lied, especially FOX.
> >
> > I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
> > read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
>
> Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
> having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
> won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
> research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
> really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
> they consider it to be a reliable source for news.

NONE of it is reliable.......

What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?

Bush doesn't lose his job next March!

The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.

I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......

Dave Smith > wrote:

> The Wolf wrote:
>
> >
> > > Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
> > > wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
> > > after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
> > > an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
> > > would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
> > > source lied, especially FOX.
> >
> > I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
> > read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
>
> Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
> having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
> won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
> research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
> really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
> they consider it to be a reliable source for news.

NONE of it is reliable.......

What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?

Bush doesn't lose his job next March!

The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.

I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......

The Wolf wrote:

> Dave Smith > wrote:
>
>
>>The Wolf wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
>>>>wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
>>>>after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
>>>>an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
>>>>would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
>>>>source lied, especially FOX.
>>>
>>>I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
>>>read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
>>
>>Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
>>having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
>>won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
>>research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
>>really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
>>they consider it to be a reliable source for news.
>
>
> NONE of it is reliable.......
>
> What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?
>
> Bush doesn't lose his job next March!
>
> The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.
>
> I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......


It really doesn't matter as much as you think. By his own admission,
Vang came back to the scene, found one of the victims alive and said,
"Aren't you dead yet??" and shot him again and killed him. That's an
admission to 1 count of premeditated murder. Wisconsin doesn't have a
death penalty, but I think that one murder should lock him away for the
rest of his miserable life. If the jury is a bunch of idiots, they
might can aquit on some of the shootings, but not that one. And one is
all it takes.

I can't figure out how he got a hunting license in WI with unpaid fines
on his record from past violations. I've bought a fishing license in WI
before, and they are all computerized. They still had my address in the
computer from a previous license several years earlier (that wasn't even
purchased in the same town.)

Bob

The Wolf wrote:

> Dave Smith > wrote:
>
>
>>The Wolf wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
>>>>wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
>>>>after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
>>>>an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
>>>>would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
>>>>source lied, especially FOX.
>>>
>>>I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
>>>read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
>>
>>Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
>>having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
>>won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
>>research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
>>really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
>>they consider it to be a reliable source for news.
>
>
> NONE of it is reliable.......
>
> What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?
>
> Bush doesn't lose his job next March!
>
> The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.
>
> I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......


It really doesn't matter as much as you think. By his own admission,
Vang came back to the scene, found one of the victims alive and said,
"Aren't you dead yet??" and shot him again and killed him. That's an
admission to 1 count of premeditated murder. Wisconsin doesn't have a
death penalty, but I think that one murder should lock him away for the
rest of his miserable life. If the jury is a bunch of idiots, they
might can aquit on some of the shootings, but not that one. And one is
all it takes.

I can't figure out how he got a hunting license in WI with unpaid fines
on his record from past violations. I've bought a fishing license in WI
before, and they are all computerized. They still had my address in the
computer from a previous license several years earlier (that wasn't even
purchased in the same town.)

Bob

The Wolf wrote:

> Dave Smith > wrote:
>
>
>>The Wolf wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
>>>>wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
>>>>after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
>>>>an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
>>>>would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
>>>>source lied, especially FOX.
>>>
>>>I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
>>>read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
>>
>>Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
>>having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
>>won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
>>research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
>>really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
>>they consider it to be a reliable source for news.
>
>
> NONE of it is reliable.......
>
> What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?
>
> Bush doesn't lose his job next March!
>
> The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.
>
> I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......


It really doesn't matter as much as you think. By his own admission,
Vang came back to the scene, found one of the victims alive and said,
"Aren't you dead yet??" and shot him again and killed him. That's an
admission to 1 count of premeditated murder. Wisconsin doesn't have a
death penalty, but I think that one murder should lock him away for the
rest of his miserable life. If the jury is a bunch of idiots, they
might can aquit on some of the shootings, but not that one. And one is
all it takes.

I can't figure out how he got a hunting license in WI with unpaid fines
on his record from past violations. I've bought a fishing license in WI
before, and they are all computerized. They still had my address in the
computer from a previous license several years earlier (that wasn't even
purchased in the same town.)

Bob

zxcvbob > wrote:

> The Wolf wrote:
>
> > Dave Smith > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The Wolf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
> >>>>wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
> >>>>after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
> >>>>an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
> >>>>would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
> >>>>source lied, especially FOX.
> >>>
> >>>I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
> >>>read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
> >>
> >>Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
> >>having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
> >>won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
> >>research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
> >>really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
> >>they consider it to be a reliable source for news.
> >
> >
> > NONE of it is reliable.......
> >
> > What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?
> >
> > Bush doesn't lose his job next March!
> >
> > The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.
> >
> > I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......
>
>
> It really doesn't matter as much as you think. By his own admission,
> Vang came back to the scene, found one of the victims alive and said,
> "Aren't you dead yet??" and shot him again and killed him. That's an
> admission to 1 count of premeditated murder. Wisconsin doesn't have a
> death penalty, but I think that one murder should lock him away for the
> rest of his miserable life. If the jury is a bunch of idiots, they
> might can aquit on some of the shootings, but not that one. And one is
> all it takes.
>
> I can't figure out how he got a hunting license in WI with unpaid fines
> on his record from past violations. I've bought a fishing license in WI
> before, and they are all computerized. They still had my address in the
> computer from a previous license several years earlier (that wasn't even
> purchased in the same town.)
>
> Bob

There was a case in Southern Californian where a "minority" took a gun
from a cop and shot him dead while being arrested.

Since the cop had a history of making disparaging remarks about
"minorities" all the "minority had to do was say he feared for his life
and he was acquitted by a jury. You can assemble 12 brain dead libs.

zxcvbob > wrote:

> The Wolf wrote:
>
> > Dave Smith > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The Wolf wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>>Reports on the web sites for both CNN and FOX said that one of the
> >>>>wounded told police that one of their party did shoot at Vang, but
> >>>>after he shot at them. I agree that it wouldn't be the first time that
> >>>>an accused person lied. Nor would it be the first time that a witness
> >>>>would lie. For that matter, it wouldn't be the first time that a news
> >>>>source lied, especially FOX.
> >>>
> >>>I didn't think you moose-****ers were allowed to watch Fox. Thought I
> >>>read by law you must get your news from the state run BBC or CBC?
> >>
> >>Then you must watch FOX news because they were the source of whining about
> >>having to wait to have their licence approved and they lied about that. I
> >>won't bother arguing facts with you on that one but you are welcome to
> >>research it on the net. See what FOX said about it and then see what
> >>really happened. Most people hear aren't much interested in FOX, nor do
> >>they consider it to be a reliable source for news.
> >
> >
> > NONE of it is reliable.......
> >
> > What's the difference between Dan Rather and George W. Bush?
> >
> > Bush doesn't lose his job next March!
> >
> > The only source of news on this shooting has been this thread for me.
> >
> > I am very interested to find out WHO fired first.......
>
>
> It really doesn't matter as much as you think. By his own admission,
> Vang came back to the scene, found one of the victims alive and said,
> "Aren't you dead yet??" and shot him again and killed him. That's an
> admission to 1 count of premeditated murder. Wisconsin doesn't have a
> death penalty, but I think that one murder should lock him away for the
> rest of his miserable life. If the jury is a bunch of idiots, they
> might can aquit on some of the shootings, but not that one. And one is
> all it takes.
>
> I can't figure out how he got a hunting license in WI with unpaid fines
> on his record from past violations. I've bought a fishing license in WI
> before, and they are all computerized. They still had my address in the
> computer from a previous license several years earlier (that wasn't even
> purchased in the same town.)
>
> Bob

There was a case in Southern Californian where a "minority" took a gun
from a cop and shot him dead while being arrested.

Since the cop had a history of making disparaging remarks about
"minorities" all the "minority had to do was say he feared for his life
and he was acquitted by a jury. You can assemble 12 brain dead libs.

In article >,
(Nancy Dooley) wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in message
> >...
> > In article > ,
> > (Nancy Dooley) wrote:
> >
> > > In addition, he was hunting in Wisconsin with a Minnesota license.
> >
> > You sure about that?
>
> That would be what the news reports said...didn't see the guy, myself
> ;-) (He is from St. Paul - he was in a deer stand in Wisconsin, for
> what that's worth.)
>
> N.

LOL! The report I'd heard mentioned his Wisconsin license number (or
something identifying a WI license holder) on his back. The stories
have been flying -- and changing. I still say it's a tragedy for all
parties.
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 10-22-04; Popovers!.
"Peace will come when the power of love overcomes the love of power."
-Jimi Hendrix, and Lt. Joe Corcoran, Retired; St. Paul PD, Homicide Divn.

In article >,
(Nancy Dooley) wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in message
> >...
> > In article > ,
> > (Nancy Dooley) wrote:
> >
> > > In addition, he was hunting in Wisconsin with a Minnesota license.
> >
> > You sure about that?
>
> That would be what the news reports said...didn't see the guy, myself
> ;-) (He is from St. Paul - he was in a deer stand in Wisconsin, for
> what that's worth.)
>
> N.

LOL! The report I'd heard mentioned his Wisconsin license number (or
something identifying a WI license holder) on his back. The stories
have been flying -- and changing. I still say it's a tragedy for all
parties.
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 10-22-04; Popovers!.
"Peace will come when the power of love overcomes the love of power."
-Jimi Hendrix, and Lt. Joe Corcoran, Retired; St. Paul PD, Homicide Divn.

In article >,
(Nancy Dooley) wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in message
> >...
> > In article > ,
> > (Nancy Dooley) wrote:
> >
> > > In addition, he was hunting in Wisconsin with a Minnesota license.
> >
> > You sure about that?
>
> That's what the early news reports said - I didn't meet the guy,
> myself. For what it's worth, he is from St. Paul and was in a deer
> stand in Wisconsin.
>
> N.

Understood.
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 10-22-04; Popovers!.
"Peace will come when the power of love overcomes the love of power."
-Jimi Hendrix, and Lt. Joe Corcoran, Retired; St. Paul PD, Homicide Divn.

In article >,
(Nancy Dooley) wrote:

> Melba's Jammin' > wrote in message
> >...
> > In article > ,
> > (Nancy Dooley) wrote:
> >
> > > In addition, he was hunting in Wisconsin with a Minnesota license.
> >
> > You sure about that?
>
> That's what the early news reports said - I didn't meet the guy,
> myself. For what it's worth, he is from St. Paul and was in a deer
> stand in Wisconsin.
>
> N.

Understood.
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> Updated 10-22-04; Popovers!.
"Peace will come when the power of love overcomes the love of power."
-Jimi Hendrix, and Lt. Joe Corcoran, Retired; St. Paul PD, Homicide Divn.