On 2020-12-08 12:45 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:34:49 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:15:53 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 9:44:47 AM UTC-5, wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 8:28:30 AM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:02:03 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Monday, December 7, 2020 at 4:59:28 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The movie I most often recommend, and one that few seem
>>>>>>> to have seen is:
>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYknOe7OluE
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it have killed you to post the title?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A Midsummer Night's Dream, 1999. I own a copy on DVD.
>>>>> [sticking finger down throat and gagging]
>>>>>
>>>> Well, no one would expect a real man's man like you to like it.
>>>
>>> I'd call my husband a mans' man, and he enjoyed it. He likes
>>> Shakespeare in Love more.
>>>
>>> I once talked to a co-worker (who'd been an electronics tech in
>>> the Air Force) about my husband's taste in movies. He said,
>>> "Anybody who's willing to hang out of a helicopter door can watch
>>> whatever they want without shame."
>> Do you really have to hang out of a helicopter before you're allowed
>> your own opinion? All y'all live in a strange world over there.
>
> No. But my co-worker was disinclined to call anyone a sissy who would
> hang out of a helicopter.
>
> Shakespeare in Love is a chick flick with just enough sword fighting to
> keep the chick's boyfriend in his seat.
>
I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.

On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2020-12-08 12:45 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:34:49 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:15:53 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 9:44:47 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 8:28:30 AM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:02:03 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Monday, December 7, 2020 at 4:59:28 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The movie I most often recommend, and one that few seem
> >>>>>>> to have seen is:
> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYknOe7OluE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Would it have killed you to post the title?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A Midsummer Night's Dream, 1999. I own a copy on DVD.
> >>>>> [sticking finger down throat and gagging]
> >>>>>
> >>>> Well, no one would expect a real man's man like you to like it.
> >>>
> >>> I'd call my husband a mans' man, and he enjoyed it. He likes
> >>> Shakespeare in Love more.
> >>>
> >>> I once talked to a co-worker (who'd been an electronics tech in
> >>> the Air Force) about my husband's taste in movies. He said,
> >>> "Anybody who's willing to hang out of a helicopter door can watch
> >>> whatever they want without shame."
> >> Do you really have to hang out of a helicopter before you're allowed
> >> your own opinion? All y'all live in a strange world over there.
> >
> > No. But my co-worker was disinclined to call anyone a sissy who would
> > hang out of a helicopter.
> >
> > Shakespeare in Love is a chick flick with just enough sword fighting to
> > keep the chick's boyfriend in his seat.
> >
> I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
> the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.

I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.

--Bryan

On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> > On 2020-12-08 12:45 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:34:49 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> > >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:15:53 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 9:44:47 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> > >>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 8:28:30 AM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> > >>>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:02:03 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Monday, December 7, 2020 at 4:59:28 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The movie I most often recommend, and one that few seem
> > >>>>>>> to have seen is:
> > >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYknOe7OluE
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Would it have killed you to post the title?
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> A Midsummer Night's Dream, 1999. I own a copy on DVD.
> > >>>>> [sticking finger down throat and gagging]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> Well, no one would expect a real man's man like you to like it.
> > >>>
> > >>> I'd call my husband a mans' man, and he enjoyed it. He likes
> > >>> Shakespeare in Love more.
> > >>>
> > >>> I once talked to a co-worker (who'd been an electronics tech in
> > >>> the Air Force) about my husband's taste in movies. He said,
> > >>> "Anybody who's willing to hang out of a helicopter door can watch
> > >>> whatever they want without shame."
> > >> Do you really have to hang out of a helicopter before you're allowed
> > >> your own opinion? All y'all live in a strange world over there.
> > >
> > > No. But my co-worker was disinclined to call anyone a sissy who would
> > > hang out of a helicopter.
> > >
> > > Shakespeare in Love is a chick flick with just enough sword fighting to
> > > keep the chick's boyfriend in his seat.
> > >
> > I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
> > the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
>
> --Bryan

Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?

Anyway, she had to be able to pass for a boy.

Cindy Hamilton

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:31:24 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
>> > >
>> > I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
>> > the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
>> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
>> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
>>
>> --Bryan
>
>Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?

Are you saying he squeezed other women as well?

Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:31:24 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
>>>> the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
>>> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
>>> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
>>>
>>> --Bryan
>>
>> Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?
>
> Are you saying he squeezed other women as well?
>

Probably like Popeye. Squeezing to see if they would squirt.

On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 3:25:55 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:31:24 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
> >> > the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
> >> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
> >> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
> >>
> >> --Bryan
> >
> >Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?
> Are you saying he squeezed other women as well?

Back then, squeezing was a perquisite enjoyed by many directors.

--Bryan

On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:58:19 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 3:25:55 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:31:24 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>> >> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
>> >> > >
>> >> > I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
>> >> > the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
>> >> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
>> >> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
>> >>
>> >> --Bryan
>> >
>> >Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?
>> Are you saying he squeezed other women as well?
>
>Back then, squeezing was a perquisite enjoyed by many directors.
>
Well, as long as the squeezee consented.
>

Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:58:19 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> > wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 3:25:55 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:31:24 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
>>>>>> the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
>>>>> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
>>>>> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
>>>>>
>>>>> --Bryan
>>>>
>>>> Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?
>>> Are you saying he squeezed other women as well?
>>
>> Back then, squeezing was a perquisite enjoyed by many directors.
>>
> Well, as long as the squeezee consented.
>>

Yoose should start asking for consent Druce.

On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 3:59:28 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:58:19 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> > wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 3:25:55 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 12:31:24 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 1:52:55 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >> >> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
> >> >> > the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.
> >> >> I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
> >> >> better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.
> >> >>
> >> >> --Bryan
> >> >
> >> >Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?
> >> Are you saying he squeezed other women as well?
> >
> >Back then, squeezing was a perquisite enjoyed by many directors.
> >
> Well, as long as the squeezee consented.
> >
What constitutes *consent* has changed. The casting couch is no more.

--Bryan

On 2020 Dec 8, , Cindy Hamilton wrote
(in >):

> Wasn't she the director's main squeeze or something like that?
>
> Anyway, she had to be able to pass for a boy.

I liked Gwyneth back then. Didn´t she give birth to an apple?

leo