On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:19:44 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2020-12-08 12:45 p.m., Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 12:34:49 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 07:15:53 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 9:44:47 AM UTC-5, wrote:
> >>>> On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 at 8:28:30 AM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> >>>>> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 03:02:03 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Monday, December 7, 2020 at 4:59:28 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The movie I most often recommend, and one that few seem
> >>>>>>> to have seen is:
> >>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYknOe7OluE
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Would it have killed you to post the title?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> A Midsummer Night's Dream, 1999. I own a copy on DVD.
> >>>>> [sticking finger down throat and gagging]
> >>>>>
> >>>> Well, no one would expect a real man's man like you to like it.
> >>>
> >>> I'd call my husband a mans' man, and he enjoyed it. He likes
> >>> Shakespeare in Love more.
> >>>
> >>> I once talked to a co-worker (who'd been an electronics tech in
> >>> the Air Force) about my husband's taste in movies. He said,
> >>> "Anybody who's willing to hang out of a helicopter door can watch
> >>> whatever they want without shame."
> >> Do you really have to hang out of a helicopter before you're allowed
> >> your own opinion? All y'all live in a strange world over there.
> >
> > No. But my co-worker was disinclined to call anyone a sissy who would
> > hang out of a helicopter.
> >
> > Shakespeare in Love is a chick flick with just enough sword fighting to
> > keep the chick's boyfriend in his seat.
> >
> I would agree about it being a chick flick, but I have to disagree about
> the sword fighting keeping the boyfriend in his seat.

I have zero interest in swordfighting. Shakespeare in Love would have been
better with a prettier actress. Yes. I am that shallow.

--Bryan