Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first available. The
first was a small Radio Shack one. Not intended for kitchen use, but it had a keypad where one could directly enter the time. I've never used one where I have to rotate up the time. I've always had a keypad. I would have thought that adding some more buttons wouldn't be that expensive. Steam from nearby pans did that one in. And now digital timers are so cheap that I have three in the kitchen, preset to the different times that I use. This one is on a shelf alongside the microwave, set to three minutes for tea: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004S0SO9M Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 One set to 30 minutes, the time for my Actifry -- the *best* for roasting root vegetables -- and the time I give the leg of lamb at 450F at the start of its cooking (in a convection oven). This timer I pull off and take with me. The other for steamed vegetables, which does vary sometimes, depending on how much I'm steaming. Or I leave it at a longer time, and just stop early. Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone like the ones you have to rotate to the time? Don. www.BigSpud.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, December 26, 2020 at 12:28:35 PM UTC-5, Don Wiss wrote:
> Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone like the > ones you have to rotate to the time? We have a timer set to 35 minutes for the laundry, and one set to 20 minutes for rice. They both have just an increment button, which makes me crazy. We have another timer with a numeric keypad that I use for most other things. I consider the numeric keypad vital. We have an egg-shaped timer that you have to rotate. It sits in the living room to time my husband's nightly sessions with ice packs. It used to be in the kitchen, but I never used it; he bought it and he used it. They're all digital. A ticking timer would drive us crazy. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/12/2020 17:28, Don Wiss wrote:
> Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 > I have a few of those, but only one is permanently stuck to the backsplash. The others come out when I'm juggling multiple items, but that hasn't happened since the first lockdown in March. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/26/2020 12:28 PM, Don Wiss wrote:
> I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first available. I have a built-in timer on the ancient 1987 stove which I don't use. I have an ancient 1 hour timer I carry from room to room if I need to set a time for 20 minutes or up to an hour. Other than that, I don't really think about kitchen timers. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
>We have a timer set to 35 minutes for the laundry, My laundry is on the third floor, where my office is. I can hear the machines buzz. But that's a good use for a timer for those with the laundry far away. > They both have just an increment button, which makes me crazy. >We have another timer with a numeric keypad that I use for most other >things. I consider the numeric keypad vital. Yes! So why when one goes to Amazon, and searches for digital kitchen timer, does one find so few with keypads? I see an Oxo that lets you save three preset times. But it is counter use only. It would get in the way. Better to attach to the range hood. Another listed is the XREXS Digital Kitchen Timer. I have one of those in my office. Right now it is just in case I need one. Sure my phone could do it, but it's a lot harder to unlock a phone and open the timer app. Which on my Samsung defaults to rotating to the number!! Don. www.donwiss.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2020-12-26 12:28 p.m., Don Wiss wrote:
> I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first available. The > first was a small Radio Shack one. Not intended for kitchen use, but it had > a keypad where one could directly enter the time. I've never used one where > I have to rotate up the time. I've always had a keypad. I would have > thought that adding some more buttons wouldn't be that expensive. > > Steam from nearby pans did that one in. And now digital timers are so cheap > that I have three in the kitchen, preset to the different times that I use. > > This one is on a shelf alongside the microwave, set to three minutes for > tea: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004S0SO9M > > Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 > > One set to 30 minutes, the time for my Actifry -- the *best* for roasting > root vegetables -- and the time I give the leg of lamb at 450F at the start > of its cooking (in a convection oven). This timer I pull off and take with > me. > > The other for steamed vegetables, which does vary sometimes, depending on > how much I'm steaming. Or I leave it at a longer time, and just stop early. > > Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone like the > ones you have to rotate to the time? > I have 4 or 5 times magnetically attached to the side of the fan hood. None are preset to a particular time for any particular reason. There is one windup which is reliable enough and which is accurate enough for my purposes, but it is just not loud enough. I have liked Polder timers. They are easy to use and nice and loud, but they have short lives. I have a couple non Polder digital timers, but they are hard to use. For instance, one of them just won't reset or do much of anything after it has been used unless you pop out the batteries and put them back in. I think the best one I ever had was a multi timer from Lee Valley. It was capable of timing 4 things simultaneously. That one worked out well for years before it failed. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/26/2020 12:28 PM, Don Wiss wrote:
> I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first available. The > first was a small Radio Shack one. Not intended for kitchen use, but it had > a keypad where one could directly enter the time. I've never used one where > I have to rotate up the time. I've always had a keypad. I would have > thought that adding some more buttons wouldn't be that expensive. > > Steam from nearby pans did that one in. And now digital timers are so cheap > that I have three in the kitchen, preset to the different times that I use. > > This one is on a shelf alongside the microwave, set to three minutes for > tea: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004S0SO9M > > Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 > > One set to 30 minutes, the time for my Actifry -- the *best* for roasting > root vegetables -- and the time I give the leg of lamb at 450F at the start > of its cooking (in a convection oven). This timer I pull off and take with > me. > > The other for steamed vegetables, which does vary sometimes, depending on > how much I'm steaming. Or I leave it at a longer time, and just stop early. > > Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone like the > ones you have to rotate to the time? > > Don. www.BigSpud.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). > When I pour the water for my tea I glance at the clock and take the infuser out 4 to 5 minutes later. I do the same when boiling eggs but 6 min. Microwave can be set as a timer but never use it. Probe thermometer can be set as a timer but never use that function either. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/26/2020 2:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> I have 4 or 5 times magnetically attached to the side of the fan hood. > None are preset to a particular time for any particular reason. > Yes but unfortunately for some reason you feel the need to tell us about each and every one of them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Dave Smith > wrote:
> I have liked Polder timers. >They are easy to use and nice and loud, but they have short lives. Just call them. They will send you replacements. Both of mine are replacements. Both gotten in one call. The CDN timer that I use to time my tea, has fallen off the shelf, and eventually it stopped sounding. That is also a replacement, but they made be pay to send it back first. Don. http://paleofood.com/ (e-mail at page bottom). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 14:39:55 -0500, Don Wiss >
wrote: >On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Cindy Hamilton > wrote: > >>We have a timer set to 35 minutes for the laundry, > >My laundry is on the third floor, where my office is. I can hear the >machines buzz. But that's a good use for a timer for those with the laundry >far away. > >> They both have just an increment button, which makes me crazy. >>We have another timer with a numeric keypad that I use for most other >>things. I consider the numeric keypad vital. > >Yes! So why when one goes to Amazon, and searches for digital kitchen >timer, does one find so few with keypads? I see an Oxo that lets you save >three preset times. But it is counter use only. It would get in the way. >Better to attach to the range hood. > >Another listed is the XREXS Digital Kitchen Timer. I have one of those in >my office. Right now it is just in case I need one. Sure my phone could do >it, but it's a lot harder to unlock a phone and open the timer app. Which >on my Samsung defaults to rotating to the number!! > >Don. www.donwiss.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). The only timers I may use are incorporated in my stove and microwave oven... and those are only a guestimate, as are all timers, I rely more on thermometers, I mostly rely on my Instaread. Yesterday I cooked a half ham. Following the timing directions on the packaging would have been a fail, a full hour off, Instaread saved the day. Anyway the ham is very good. And I'll have a meaty bone for pea soup. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, December 26, 2020 at 7:28:35 AM UTC-10, Don Wiss wrote:
> I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first available. The > first was a small Radio Shack one. Not intended for kitchen use, but it had > a keypad where one could directly enter the time. I've never used one where > I have to rotate up the time. I've always had a keypad. I would have > thought that adding some more buttons wouldn't be that expensive. > > Steam from nearby pans did that one in. And now digital timers are so cheap > that I have three in the kitchen, preset to the different times that I use. > > This one is on a shelf alongside the microwave, set to three minutes for > tea: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004S0SO9M > > Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 > > One set to 30 minutes, the time for my Actifry -- the *best* for roasting > root vegetables -- and the time I give the leg of lamb at 450F at the start > of its cooking (in a convection oven). This timer I pull off and take with > me. > > The other for steamed vegetables, which does vary sometimes, depending on > how much I'm steaming. Or I leave it at a longer time, and just stop early. > > Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone like the > ones you have to rotate to the time? > > Don. www.BigSpud.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). I use my cell phone for a timer. If I'm cooking up noodles, and standing at the stove, I'll use the timer on my microwave. A package of Korean noodles will typically cook in 3 minutes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Wiss wrote:
> I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first > available. The first was a small Radio Shack one. Not intended for > kitchen use, but it had a keypad where one could directly enter the > time. I've never used one where I have to rotate up the time. I've > always had a keypad. I would have thought that adding some more > buttons wouldn't be that expensive. > > Steam from nearby pans did that one in. And now digital timers are so > cheap that I have three in the kitchen, preset to the different times > that I use. > > This one is on a shelf alongside the microwave, set to three minutes > for tea: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004S0SO9M > > Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): > https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 > > One set to 30 minutes, the time for my Actifry -- the best for > roasting root vegetables -- and the time I give the leg of lamb at > 450F at the start of its cooking (in a convection oven). This timer I > pull off and take with me. > > The other for steamed vegetables, which does vary sometimes, > depending on how much I'm steaming. Or I leave it at a longer time, > and just stop early. > > Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone > like the ones you have to rotate to the time? > > Don. www.BigSpud.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). I have the one on the stove front, and a manual. The manual travels with me if I will be out of hearing distance from the stove one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Sheldon Martin > wrote:
> I rely >more on thermometers, I mostly rely on my Instaread. Yesterday I >cooked a half ham. Following the timing directions on the packaging >would have been a fail, a full hour off, Instaread saved the day. I remember when I tried timing legs of lamb (in a regular oven). The guidelines, so much per pound, are for a middle size. If smaller, than too much. If larger, than not enough. The only way to roast meat is with a thermometer. And with my office two floors above the kitchen, I use this ThermaPro wireless: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B014DAVCP4 Don. www.donwiss.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> There is one windup which is reliable enough and which is accurate > enough for my purposes, but it is just not loud enough. Well, you need to order a Hawaiian hearing aide from dsi1. He claims to sell some really cheap ass models ... cheap enough even for a canadian. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> On 12/26/2020 2:46 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > >> I have 4 or 5 times magnetically attached to the side of the fan >> hood. None are preset to a particular time for any particular >> reason. > > > Yes but unfortunately for some reason you feel the need to tell us > about each and every one of them. > That's not too much of a problem, but it does attract a certain nasty dutch butt sniffer. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 26 Dec 2020 Don Wiss wrote:
>On Sat, 26 Dec 2020, Sheldon Martin wrote: > >> I rely >>more on thermometers, I mostly rely on my Instaread. Yesterday I >>cooked a half ham. Following the timing directions on the packaging >>would have been a fail, a full hour off, Instaread saved the day. > >I remember when I tried timing legs of lamb (in a regular oven). The >guidelines, so much per pound, are for a middle size. If smaller, than too >much. If larger, than not enough. The only way to roast meat is with a >thermometer. And with my office two floors above the kitchen, I use this >ThermaPro wireless: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B014DAVCP4 > >Don. www.donwiss.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). I never follow the package instructions for how long to cook, my half ham would have been way undercooked. I added 30 minutes twice. Turned out very well. Had I followed their instructions I'd probably become sick. What's wrong with the meat producers? the instructions actually say you don't need to cook it and can eat it cold, BULLSHIT. I cooked it to an internal temperature of 140 degrees, they said 130º, nonsence. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/26/2020 8:21 PM, Sheldon Martin wrote:
> > I never follow the package instructions for how long to cook, my half > ham would have been way undercooked. I added 30 minutes twice. Turned > out very well. Had I followed their instructions I'd probably become > sick. What's wrong with the meat producers? > the instructions actually say you don't need to cook it and can eat it > cold, BULLSHIT. I cooked it to an internal temperature of 140 > degrees, they said 130º, nonsence. > Fresh ham or cured and pre-cooked? I've eaten them cold and 140 is fine to "bake" it. It will go up in temperature while sitting anyway. All you are doing is reheating, not cooking it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 12/26/2020 12:28 PM, Don Wiss wrote: >> I've had a digital timer, since from when they became first >> available. The >> first was a small Radio Shack one. Not intended for kitchen use, >> but it had >> a keypad where one could directly enter the time. I've never used >> one where >> I have to rotate up the time. I've always had a keypad. I would have >> thought that adding some more buttons wouldn't be that expensive. >> >> Steam from nearby pans did that one in. And now digital timers >> are so cheap >> that I have three in the kitchen, preset to the different times >> that I use. >> >> This one is on a shelf alongside the microwave, set to three >> minutes for >> tea: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B004S0SO9M >> >> Then two of these are attached to the exhaust hood (sans strings): >> https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00004S4U7 >> >> One set to 30 minutes, the time for my Actifry -- the *best* for >> roasting >> root vegetables -- and the time I give the leg of lamb at 450F at >> the start >> of its cooking (in a convection oven). This timer I pull off and >> take with >> me. >> >> The other for steamed vegetables, which does vary sometimes, >> depending on >> how much I'm steaming. Or I leave it at a longer time, and just >> stop early. >> >> Do others have multiple timers with preset times? And does anyone >> like the >> ones you have to rotate to the time? >> >> Don. www.BigSpud.com (e-mail link at home page bottom). >> > > When I pour the water for my tea I glance at the clock and take the > infuser out 4 to 5 minutes later. I do the same when boiling eggs > but 6 min. > Hell Ed, most of us forget we even made tea after 2 to 3 minutes! But, seriously, I want to buy the finest timer on the planet. I'm going to wait for Popeye to chime in. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sheldon Martin wrote:
> Yesterday I cooked a half ham. Popeye, did yoose trow the other half out yoose window? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 12/26/2020 8:21 PM, Sheldon Martin wrote: > >> >> I never follow the package instructions for how long to cook, my >> half >> ham would have been way undercooked.* I added 30 minutes twice. >> Turned >> out very well.* Had I followed their instructions I'd probably >> become >> sick.* What's wrong with the meat producers? >> the instructions actually say you don't need to cook it and can >> eat it >> cold, BULLSHIT.** I cooked it to an internal temperature of 140 >> degrees, they said 130º, nonsence. >> > > Fresh ham or cured and pre-cooked?* I've eaten them cold and 140 is > fine to "bake" it.* It will go up in temperature while sitting > anyway.* All you are doing is reheating, not cooking it. Isn't Popeye jewish? I think they have to incinerate pork unless it comes from a kosher deli. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2020 Dec 26, , dsi1 wrote
(in >): > I use my cell phone for a timer. If I'm cooking up noodles, and standing at > the stove, I'll use the timer on my microwave. A package of Korean noodles > will typically cook in 3 minutes. I use my watch as a timer. I bring it up toward my face and say "set a timer for x minutes and y seconds". The watch says "ok, I set a timer for x minutes and y seconds". After x minutes and y seconds, the watch lightly squeezes my wristband which squeezes my wrist and the watch dings faintly. Then, it´s up to me. I sometimes say x hours, y minutes and z seconds. I´ve never tried setting multiple timers on it. I´m a one-at-a-time kind of guy. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, December 26, 2020 at 8:50:50 PM UTC-10, Leo wrote:
> On 2020 Dec 26, , dsi1 wrote > (in >): > > I use my cell phone for a timer. If I'm cooking up noodles, and standing at > > the stove, I'll use the timer on my microwave. A package of Korean noodles > > will typically cook in 3 minutes. > I use my watch as a timer. I bring it up toward my face and say "set a > timer for x minutes and y seconds". The watch says "ok, I set a timer for > x minutes and y seconds". After x minutes and y seconds, the watch lightly > squeezes my wristband which squeezes my wrist and the watch dings faintly.. > Then, it´s up to me. I sometimes say x hours, y minutes and z seconds. > I´ve never tried setting multiple timers on it. I´m a one-at-a-time kind > of guy. I got a smart phone and you got a smart watch. Smart is a good thing. I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dsi1 wrote:
>I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. > Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU Back when I ran long distance, I would also have to do other exercises to balance the muscles. The very worst and most boring exercise was to do 50 or so pushups every few days. (Please kill me now!) Then I discovered a song to listen to while I did them. It was Bruce Springsteens, "Born in the USA." The perfect tempo and timing. I would start that song, then drop down and start the pushups. The pushups were still annoying but the song helped...played loudly too. My motto then was, "strength through disipline." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have 3 digital kitchen times,none of them preset. We have three because my husband had to keep buying louder ones :-} and I think he can only hear one of them now. But I find it very handy to use three when cooking three different things or to take with me around the house or garden. Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>dsi1 wrote: > >>I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. >> Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU > >Back when I ran long distance, I would also have to do other exercises >to balance the muscles. The very worst and most boring exercise was to >do 50 or so pushups every few days. (Please kill me now!) > >Then I discovered a song to listen to while I did them. It was Bruce >Springsteens, "Born in the USA." The perfect tempo and timing. >I would start that song, then drop down and start the pushups. >The pushups were still annoying but the song helped...played loudly too. > >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: > > >dsi1 wrote: > > > >>I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. > >> Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." > >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU > > > >Back when I ran long distance, I would also have to do other exercises > >to balance the muscles. The very worst and most boring exercise was to > >do 50 or so pushups every few days. (Please kill me now!) > > > >Then I discovered a song to listen to while I did them. It was Bruce > >Springsteens, "Born in the USA." The perfect tempo and timing. > >I would start that song, then drop down and start the pushups. > >The pushups were still annoying but the song helped...played loudly too. > > > >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." > I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 3:30:43 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote: > > >I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. > > Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU > Back when I ran long distance, I would also have to do other exercises > to balance the muscles. The very worst and most boring exercise was to > do 50 or so pushups every few days. (Please kill me now!) > > Then I discovered a song to listen to while I did them. It was Bruce > Springsteens, "Born in the USA." The perfect tempo and timing. > I would start that song, then drop down and start the pushups. > The pushups were still annoying but the song helped...played loudly too. > > My motto then was, "strength through disipline." Music has the ability to compress or expand time. It's quite an amazing thing. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >> >> >dsi1 wrote: >> > >> >>I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. >> >> Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU >> > >> >Back when I ran long distance, I would also have to do other exercises >> >to balance the muscles. The very worst and most boring exercise was to >> >do 50 or so pushups every few days. (Please kill me now!) >> > >> >Then I discovered a song to listen to while I did them. It was Bruce >> >Springsteens, "Born in the USA." The perfect tempo and timing. >> >I would start that song, then drop down and start the pushups. >> >The pushups were still annoying but the song helped...played loudly too. >> > >> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." > >Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". Yes, you don't want to sound like "Spelling is my forty." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >> >> >dsi1 wrote: >> > >> >>I wish that timers would play a little ditty while you're waiting to make the time go faster. >> >> Here's my favorite song to make ramen. I think it's called "3 min." >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WiNhk7_j4OU >> > >> >Back when I ran long distance, I would also have to do other exercises >> >to balance the muscles. The very worst and most boring exercise was to >> >do 50 or so pushups every few days. (Please kill me now!) >> > >> >Then I discovered a song to listen to while I did them. It was Bruce >> >Springsteens, "Born in the USA." The perfect tempo and timing. >> >I would start that song, then drop down and start the pushups. >> >The pushups were still annoying but the song helped...played loudly too. >> > >> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." > >Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". > >Cindy Hamilton The correct pronunciation is fort... only uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of a sword. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin >
wrote: >On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton > wrote: > >>On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >>> >>> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." > >>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >> >>Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >> >>Cindy Hamilton > >The correct pronunciation is fort... only >uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of >a sword. Look he <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> fortay or fort |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 6:09:43 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > > wrote: > > >On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > > > >>On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: > >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >>> > >>> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." > > > >>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." > >> > >>Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". > >> > >>Cindy Hamilton > > > >The correct pronunciation is fort... only > >uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of > >a sword. > Look he > <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> > > fortay or fort I do "Alexa, set timer 22 minutes" Everything else has a timer but AI is winning. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/27/2020 5:58 PM, Sheldon Martin wrote:
>>>> My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >> >> Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >> >> Cindy Hamilton > > The correct pronunciation is fort... only > uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of > a sword. > You tell 'em. This uneducated imbeciles at Merriam-Webster don't know how to say it. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte https://www.thefreedictionary.com/Fort%C3%A9 These guys have three ways of saying it https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/forte https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bHk...annel=WordsRUs |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/27/2020 6:09 PM, Master Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > > wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >> > wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >>>> >>>>> My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >> >>>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >>> >>> Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >>> >>> Cindy Hamilton >> >> The correct pronunciation is fort... only >> uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of >> a sword. > > Look he > <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> > > fortay or fort > Multilingual: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNId...Pronunciations |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 19:22:43 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>On 12/27/2020 6:09 PM, Master Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >>> >>>>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >>>> >>>> Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >>>> >>>> Cindy Hamilton >>> >>> The correct pronunciation is fort... only >>> uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of >>> a sword. >> >> Look he >> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> >> >> fortay or fort >> > >Multilingual: >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNId...Pronunciations Sheldon will say that all 4 are uneducated imbeciles ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 6:09:43 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > > wrote: > > >On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > > > >>On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: > >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >>> > >>> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." > > > >>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." > >> > >>Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". > >> > >>Cindy Hamilton > > > >The correct pronunciation is fort... only > >uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of > >a sword. > Look he > <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> > > fortay or fort Depends whether Merriam-Webster is descriptive or prescriptive. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 02:46:11 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: >On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 6:09:43 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > >> wrote: >> >> >On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >> > wrote: >> > >> >>On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >> >>> >> >>> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >> > >> >>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >> >> >> >>Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >> >> >> >>Cindy Hamilton >> > >> >The correct pronunciation is fort... only >> >uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of >> >a sword. >> Look he >> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> >> >> fortay or fort > >Depends whether Merriam-Webster is descriptive or prescriptive. Descriptive. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 5:50:29 AM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 02:46:11 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton > > wrote: > > >On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 6:09:43 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > > >> wrote: > >> > >> >On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >>On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: > >> >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> >My motto then was, "strength through disipline." > >> > > >> >>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." > >> >> > >> >>Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". > >> >> > >> >>Cindy Hamilton > >> > > >> >The correct pronunciation is fort... only > >> >uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of > >> >a sword. > >> Look he > >> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> > >> > >> fortay or fort > > > >Depends whether Merriam-Webster is descriptive or prescriptive. > Descriptive. Now it's down to whether you think pronunciation is by majority rule. Should the majority of imbeciles decide how it should be pronounced, or should we use the French-ish pronunciation, since it's a French word? Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/27/2020 4:22 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 12/27/2020 6:09 PM, Master Bruce wrote: >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > >> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >>> >>>>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >>>> >>>> Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >>>> >>>> Cindy Hamilton >>> >>> The correct pronunciation is fort... only >>> uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of >>> a sword. >> >> Look he >> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> >> >> fortay or fort >> > > Multilingual: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNId...Pronunciations > But that doesn't say which meaning of forte. It is pronounced differently for different meanings. Strong suit: it is properly pronounced fort. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/28/2020 3:52 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 5:50:29 AM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >> On Mon, 28 Dec 2020 02:46:11 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >> > wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 6:09:43 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My motto then was, "strength through disipline." >>>>> >>>>>>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." >>>>>> >>>>>> Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". >>>>>> >>>>>> Cindy Hamilton >>>>> >>>>> The correct pronunciation is fort... only >>>>> uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of >>>>> a sword. >>>> Look he >>>> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> >>>> >>>> fortay or fort >>> >>> Depends whether Merriam-Webster is descriptive or prescriptive. >> Descriptive. > > Now it's down to whether you think pronunciation is by majority rule. > > Should the majority of imbeciles decide how it should be pronounced, > or should we use the French-ish pronunciation, since it's a French word? > > Cindy Hamilton > irregardless . . . |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, December 28, 2020 at 7:39:58 AM UTC-5, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 12/27/2020 4:22 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote: > > On 12/27/2020 6:09 PM, Master Bruce wrote: > >> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 17:58:40 -0500, Sheldon Martin > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 10:42:38 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton > >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> On Sunday, December 27, 2020 at 1:38:24 PM UTC-5, Master Bruce wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, 27 Dec 2020 08:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> My motto then was, "strength through disipline." > >>> > >>>>> I thought it was "Spelling is my forte." > >>>> > >>>> Sure. But you have to pronounce it "for-tay". > >>>> > >>>> Cindy Hamilton > >>> > >>> The correct pronunciation is fort... only > >>> uneducated imbeciles say fortay... the forte is the strong portion of > >>> a sword. > >> > >> Look he > >> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/forte> > >> > >> fortay or fort > >> > > > > Multilingual: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNId...Pronunciations > > > But that doesn't say which meaning of forte. It is pronounced > differently for different meanings. Strong suit: it is properly > pronounced fort. True. A musician using the Italian word that's spelled the same would say it _is_ pronounced for-tay, and be correct. Cindy Hamilton |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Kitchen Timers | General Cooking | |||
Fifty turkey timers | General Cooking | |||
Old timers out there? | General Cooking | |||
OT - Another Goody For The Old-timers | General Cooking | |||
Weekend survey on the RFC site: Kitchen/Cooking timers | General Cooking |