On 2021-02-20 2:08 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
> What?Â* What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses' computer
> clock?Â* Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time.Â* What
> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
> my control.
>
> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
>
> Jill
>
> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later
>> than the current time.

You indicate that it is 2 pm there and my system shows it arriving here
at 2:08. I sent that at 2pm because he is a time zone earlier than me
and his posts were like 7 and 7 pm. Everyone else's posts are showing
up with appropriate time stamps. I doubt there is a problem with my
battery because this laptop is only two months old.

wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 1:25 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> > On 2/20/2021 11:08 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> >> What? What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses' computer
> >> clock? Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time. What
> >> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
> >> my control.
> >>
> >> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
> >>
> >> Jill
> >>
> >> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> >>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
> >>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later than
> >>> the current time.
> >
> >
> > Yes, I see it too. His posts are answered by people before he posted
> > his. LOL.
> What if it is a time anomaly, or worse, the surveillance state is
> reading my mind, and knows what I'm going to post?


NO reason to accommodate the "wishes" of Old Grumpypants Dave, Bryan...your time stamp is fine just the way it is...

--
Best
Greg

Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:02:27 -0500, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/2021 11:51 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat meat if
>>>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat and would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be rude!
>>>
>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>
>> Or you could simply say, "Thank you for the gift but I'm a vegetarian."
>> That's not rude. It proves you are wimpy non-committed vegetarian.
>
> That still beats a carnivore.
>

Or a butt sniffer.

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 11:50:04 -0800 (PST), Bruce
> wrote:

wrote:
>> On 2/20/2021 1:25 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>> > On 2/20/2021 11:08 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> >> What? What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses' computer
>> >> clock? Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time. What
>> >> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
>> >> my control.
>> >>
>> >> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
>> >>
>> >> Jill
>> >>
>> >> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> >>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
>> >>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later than
>> >>> the current time.
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, I see it too. His posts are answered by people before he posted
>> > his. LOL.
>> What if it is a time anomaly, or worse, the surveillance state is
>> reading my mind, and knows what I'm going to post?
>
>
>NO reason to accommodate the "wishes" of Old Grumpypants Dave, Bryan...your time stamp is fine just the way it is...
>
>--
>Best
>Greg

You're not a very convincing Bruce if you sign off with Greg.

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:43:38 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2021-02-20 2:08 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>> What?Â* What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses' computer
>> clock?Â* Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time.Â* What
>> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
>> my control.
>>
>> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
>>
>> Jill
>>
>> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
>>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later
>>> than the current time.
>
>You indicate that it is 2 pm there and my system shows it arriving here
>at 2:08. I sent that at 2pm because he is a time zone earlier than me
>and his posts were like 7 and 7 pm. Everyone else's posts are showing
>up with appropriate time stamps. I doubt there is a problem with my
>battery because this laptop is only two months old.

Dave's right.

Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 07:48:13 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 10:46:26 AM UTC-5, cshenk wrote:
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> John, a self-proclaimed vegetarian, doesn't even know what
>>>> "vegetarian" means. Classic Kuthe at its best.
>>>>
>>>> -sw
>>> Steve Lacto-Ovo vegetarians are common. Some just use Lacto and skip
>>> the eggs or limit the eggs to Fish roe.
>>
>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat meat if
>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>
> Said the carnivore, with a slither of corpse hanging out of the corner
> of her mouth.
>

Said the butt sniffer with a fart in his lungs.

On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 10:51:08 AM UTC-6, wrote:
>
> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat and would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be rude!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>
You don't turn down the gift of meat and not because it's rude, you can't afford
that expenditure. You'd eat meat 7 days a week if you could afford it.

You don't buy meant because it's 4 times or more expensive than vegetables.
Just be truthful for once in your life and say you cannot afford that expense
since you have no income coming in. No job and no renters, just a white
elephant house on your hands.

People here *might* have a smattering of respect for you if you weren't such
a compulsive liar.

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:44:50 -0800 (PST), "
> wrote:

>On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 10:51:08 AM UTC-6, wrote:
>>
>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat and would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be rude!
>>
>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>
>You don't turn down the gift of meat and not because it's rude, you can't afford
>that expenditure. You'd eat meat 7 days a week if you could afford it.
>
>You don't buy meant because it's 4 times or more expensive than vegetables.
>Just be truthful for once in your life and say you cannot afford that expense
>since you have no income coming in. No job and no renters, just a white
>elephant house on your hands.
>
>People here *might* have a smattering of respect for you if you weren't such
>a compulsive liar.

And do you think your behaviour inspires a lot of respect?

On 2021-02-20 10:56 p.m., BryanGSimmons wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 1:53 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:43:38 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2021-02-20 2:08 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>>> What?Â* What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses'
>>>> computer
>>>> clock?Â* Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time.
>>>> What
>>>> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
>>>> my control.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
>>>>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later
>>>>> than the current time.
>>>
>>> You indicate that it is 2 pm there and my system shows it arriving here
>>> at 2:08. I sent that at 2pm because he is a time zone earlier than me
>>> and his posts were like 7 and 7 pm.Â* Everyone else's posts are showing
>>> up with appropriate time stamps.Â* I doubt there is a problem with my
>>> battery because thisÂ* laptop is only two months old.
>>
>> Dave's right.
>>
> The problem was on my end, and I did fix it.

Did you? Cuz this appears to be a new reply but it is time stamped 5
hours into the future.

>

On 2/20/2021 11:02 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 11:51 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> ...
>>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat meat if
>>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat and
>> would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be rude!
>>
>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>
> Or you could simply say, "Thank you for the gift but I'm a vegetarian."
> Â*That's not rude.Â* It proves you are wimpy non-committed vegetarian.
> The fact that you didn't go out and buy it is not significant.
>
> Jill
>
Some of us would like to see him committed.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/20/2021 12:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:14:11 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:51:08 AM UTC-5, wrote:
>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat meat if
>>>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat and would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be rude!
>>
>> It shows us that "manners" is worth more to you than the life of an animal.
>> You're a hypocrite. Way to virtue-signal, dude.
>
> You're a carnivore. You have no right to preach about this.
>
I wonder what it would be like to eat pieces off an animal
that was still alive, like *real* carnivores do.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/20/2021 12:08 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:55:26 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2/20/2021 3:19 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2021 11:02 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 2/20/2021 11:51 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat meat if
>>>>>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat and
>>>>> would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be rude!
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>>>
>>>> Or you could simply say, "Thank you for the gift but I'm a vegetarian."
>>>> Â*That's not rude.Â* It proves you are wimpy non-committed vegetarian.
>>>> The fact that you didn't go out and buy it is not significant.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>> >
>>> Some of us would like to see him committed.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Most of you want to see him keep posting.
>
> Ain't that the truth.
>
Have I ever once said that I miss Andy? If John were to die
tomorrow, I'd say, "Good riddance."

Does anyone miss the ****ing BOVEine? You two are both full
of shit.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/20/2021 12:30 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 7:21 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>> On 2/20/2021 12:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:14:11 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:51:08 AM UTC-5,
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat meat if
>>>>>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat
>>>>> and would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be
>>>>> rude!
>>>>
>>>> It shows us that "manners" is worth more to you than the life of an
>>>> animal.
>>>> You're a hypocrite.Â* Way to virtue-signal, dude.
>>>
>>> You're a carnivore. You have no right to preach about this.
>>>
>> I wonder what it would be like to eat pieces off an animal
>> that was still alive, like *real* carnivores do.
>>
> Let's just put you on the FBI watchlist for potential serial killers.
>
My point was that real carnivores slaughter their food in far more
*inhumane* ways. Should we capture and sterilize all the lions and
wolves on the planet?
>
> Someone (Bruce) is confusing Carnivores with Omnivores.Â* Even cats eat
> plants.Â* Oops, I mentioned cats, sorry!Â* Wild birds eat eggs.Â* They also
> eat grains and seeds and berries and if you throw some cheese made from
> cows milk or suet made from rendered beef they'll eat that, too.Â* It's
> all so confusing!
>
Bruce has self demoted from the apex of the food chain status that
was his birthright. He thinks that others should do so as well. In
the past six months, I think it's safe to say that *I* have posted
more about vegetarian meals than he has, often with links to photos.
Bruce is here because he's a whiny little bitch.

According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
Lucas. Is that true?
>
> Jill


--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/20/2021 6:36 AM, John Kuthe wrote:

> I'm

THIS ISN'T YOUR PERSONAL MESSAGE BOARD, YOU BRAINDEAD ****TARD!

NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR CHILDISH GARBAGE, DUMB****!

You're still an unemployable failure and always will be!

You are a waste of air.

Nobody gives a shit about your house.
Nobody gives a shit about your sound system.
Nobody gives a shit about your car.
Nobody gives a shit about your exercise.
Nobody gives a shit about your chronic unemployment.
Nobody gives a shit about your mental illness.
Nobody gives a shit about your feeble attempts at "cooking."
Nobody gives a shit about your pointless pathetic "obsessions."
Nobody gives a shit about your life.

NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU. SHUT THE **** UP AND LEAVE!

On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 6:30:46 AM UTC-6, Janet wrote:
> In article >, penmart01
> @aol.com says...
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:26:08 -0800, Taxed and Spent
> > > wrote:
> >
> > >On 2/18/2021 6:57 AM, S Viemeister wrote:
> > >> On 18/02/2021 14:31, Sheldon Martin wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Brown rice has no more protein than white rice (zero), just has more
> > >>> fiber... may as well add sawdust.
>
I like the taste and texture of brown rice. When my son moves out, we'll
eat more brown rice.
> > >>
> > >> Brown rice contains 2.6 g protein per 100 g
> > >>
> > >>> Baked beans contain no essential
> > >>> amino acid unless it's PORK and beans.
> > >>
> > >> Baked beans contain 6 protein per 100 g.
> > >I bet you enjoy shooting fish in a barrel, too.
> >
> > All morons... beans contain vegetable protein but no essential amino
> > acids... only found in meat... MORONS!
> That's not true. Essential amino acids are also found in eggs, dairy,
> cheese. Vegetarians easily get enough from eating those animal
> products; they don't need to eat meat.
>
Humans evolved to be omnivores, but lacto-ovo vegetarians can be
totally healthy, and pescatarians like Bruce, even more so. Bruce seems
to be here mostly to meat shame. He almost never posts about his
meals.
>
> Janet UK
>
--Bryan

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:35:47 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Friday, February 19, 2021 at 6:30:46 AM UTC-6, Janet wrote:
>> In article >, penmart01
>> @aol.com says...
>> >
>> > On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 07:26:08 -0800, Taxed and Spent
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> > >On 2/18/2021 6:57 AM, S Viemeister wrote:
>> > >> On 18/02/2021 14:31, Sheldon Martin wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Brown rice has no more protein than white rice (zero), just has more
>> > >>> fiber... may as well add sawdust.
>>
>I like the taste and texture of brown rice. When my son moves out, we'll
>eat more brown rice.

The snowflake can't handle brown rice either? What kind of princess
did you raise?

>Humans evolved to be omnivores, but lacto-ovo vegetarians can be
>totally healthy, and pescatarians like Bruce, even more so. Bruce seems
>to be here mostly to meat shame. He almost never posts about his
>meals.

'Meat shaming' I like it. We've made a new culinary discovery: quinoa
tempeh. Works really well. I could post a picture next time, but I
don't think there's much of a market for tempeh in RFC.

On 2/20/2021 1:25 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 11:08 AM, jmcquown wrote:
>> What?Â* What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses' computer
>> clock?Â* Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time.Â* What
>> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
>> my control.
>>
>> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
>>
>> Jill
>>
>> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
>>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later than
>>> the current time.
>
>
> Yes, I see it too.Â* His posts are answered by people before he posted
> his.Â* LOL.

What if it is a time anomaly, or worse, the surveillance state is
reading my mind, and knows what I'm going to post?

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/20/2021 1:53 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 14:43:38 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2021-02-20 2:08 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>> What?Â* What makes you think it is a problem with someone elses' computer
>>> clock?Â* Mine says it's just after 2PM here, Eastern Standard time.Â* What
>>> you actually see/read as the posted time or when they arrive is out of
>>> my control.
>>>
>>> Maybe you need to change the battery for your computer clock, though.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>>
>>> On 2/20/2021 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> Can you do something about your clock. You posts are showing up at the
>>>> end of my new mail because it things they are almost 6 hours later
>>>> than the current time.
>>
>> You indicate that it is 2 pm there and my system shows it arriving here
>> at 2:08. I sent that at 2pm because he is a time zone earlier than me
>> and his posts were like 7 and 7 pm. Everyone else's posts are showing
>> up with appropriate time stamps. I doubt there is a problem with my
>> battery because this laptop is only two months old.
>
> Dave's right.
>
The problem was on my end, and I did fix it.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
> On 2/20/2021 12:30 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 2/20/2021 7:21 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2021 12:09 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 09:14:11 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:51:08 AM UTC-5,
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 9:48:15 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Steve may have been referring to the fact that Kuthe will eat
>>>>>>> meat if
>>>>>>> it's free. Not much of a vegetarian, in my opinion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>> I do not buy meat for my consumption, although I still love meat
>>>>>> and would never turn a delicious gift down! Because that would be
>>>>>> rude!
>>>>>
>>>>> It shows us that "manners" is worth more to you than the life of an
>>>>> animal.
>>>>> You're a hypocrite.Â* Way to virtue-signal, dude.
>>>>
>>>> You're a carnivore. You have no right to preach about this.
>>>>
>>> I wonder what it would be like to eat pieces off an animal
>>> that was still alive, like *real* carnivores do.
>>>
>> Let's just put you on the FBI watchlist for potential serial killers.
> >
> My point was that real carnivores slaughter their food in far more
> *inhumane* ways.Â* Should we capture and sterilize all the lions and
> wolves on the planet?
>>
>> Someone (Bruce) is confusing Carnivores with Omnivores.Â* Even cats eat
>> plants.Â* Oops, I mentioned cats, sorry!Â* Wild birds eat eggs.Â* They
>> also eat grains and seeds and berries and if you throw some cheese
>> made from cows milk or suet made from rendered beef they'll eat that,
>> too.Â* It's all so confusing!
> >
> Bruce has self demoted from the apex of the food chain status that
> was his birthright.Â* He thinks that others should do so as well.Â* In
> the past six months, I think it's safe to say that *I* have posted
> more about vegetarian meals than he has, often with links to photos.
> Bruce is here because he's a whiny little bitch.
>
> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
> Lucas.Â* Is that true?
>
I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.

Jill

On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:

>> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
>> Lucas.Â* Is that true?
>>
>I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
>food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.

I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
food, politics and hummingbirds.

On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:16:33 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
> wrote:
> >On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>
> >> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
> >> Lucas. Is that true?
> >>
> >I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
> >food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.
> I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
> thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
> food, politics and hummingbirds.
>
"Looking for a newsgroup about food" where you could give omnivores
shit for eating animals? Why didn't you find somewhere where folks
shared your food interests? That's obvious. Why preach to the choir?

--Bryan

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 04:25:15 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:16:33 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>> >On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>
>> >> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
>> >> Lucas. Is that true?
>> >>
>> >I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
>> >food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.
>> I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
>> thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
>> food, politics and hummingbirds.
>>
>"Looking for a newsgroup about food" where you could give omnivores
>shit for eating animals? Why didn't you find somewhere where folks
>shared your food interests? That's obvious. Why preach to the choir?
>
There is no rec.food.pescatarian. There was a vegetarian food group
but it only contained spam.
>
You're back to your retarded Usenet provider.
>

On 21/02/2021 18:36, Bruce wrote:

> There is no rec.food.pescatarian. There was a vegetarian food group
> but it only contained spam.

Hmm. Vegetarian spam.
Have an ingredient list for that?

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 19:39:10 +0000, S Viemeister
> wrote:

>On 21/02/2021 18:36, Bruce wrote:
>
>> There is no rec.food.pescatarian. There was a vegetarian food group
>> but it only contained spam.
>
>Hmm. Vegetarian spam.
>Have an ingredient list for that?

No, but I bet it involves pea powder.

On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 12:36:15 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 04:25:15 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> > wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:16:33 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
> >> wrote:
> >> >On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>
> >> >> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
> >> >> Lucas. Is that true?
> >> >>
> >> >I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
> >> >food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.
> >> I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
> >> thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
> >> food, politics and hummingbirds.
> >>
> >"Looking for a newsgroup about food" where you could give omnivores
> >shit for eating animals? Why didn't you find somewhere where folks
> >shared your food interests? That's obvious. Why preach to the choir?
> >
> There is no rec.food.pescatarian. There was a vegetarian food group
> but it only contained spam.
> >
> You're back to your retarded Usenet provider.
> >
I'm sure that folks who have a loved one with Down Syndrome
appreciate your choice of adjectives. That's a playground word.

--Bryan

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 12:05:31 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 12:36:15 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 04:25:15 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:16:33 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
>> >> >> Lucas. Is that true?
>> >> >>
>> >> >I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
>> >> >food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.
>> >> I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
>> >> thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
>> >> food, politics and hummingbirds.
>> >>
>> >"Looking for a newsgroup about food" where you could give omnivores
>> >shit for eating animals? Why didn't you find somewhere where folks
>> >shared your food interests? That's obvious. Why preach to the choir?
>> >
>> There is no rec.food.pescatarian. There was a vegetarian food group
>> but it only contained spam.
>> >
>> You're back to your retarded Usenet provider.
>> >
>I'm sure that folks who have a loved one with Down Syndrome
>appreciate your choice of adjectives. That's a playground word.
>
Of course someone with Down syndrome is retarded. Duh.
>

Bryan Simmons wrote:
> On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:16:33 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>> On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
>>
>>>> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
>>>> Lucas. Is that true?
>>>>
>>> I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
>>> food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.
>> I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
>> thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
>> food, politics and hummingbirds.
>>
> "Looking for a newsgroup about food" where you could give omnivores
> shit for eating animals? Why didn't you find somewhere where folks
> shared your food interests? That's obvious. Why preach to the choir?
>
> --Bryan
>

Bryan, he came here to sniff assholes.

On 2021-02-21 3:05 p.m., Bryan Simmons wrote:
> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 12:36:15 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>
>> There is no rec.food.pescatarian. There was a vegetarian food group
>> but it only contained spam.
>>>
>> You're back to your retarded Usenet provider.
>>>
> I'm sure that folks who have a loved one with Down Syndrome
> appreciate your choice of adjectives. That's a playground word.

Well, that is their problem for choosing to be offended. Mentally
retarded was a perfectly acceptable term that described their cognitive
ability. Unfortunately, every time they had a label for degrees of
mental ability it would eventually become a pejorative. Before that they
had labeled them as idiots, simpletons and moron.


Mentally was only recently officially replaced by mental disability.
Mark my words. It won't be long before mental disability becomes a
pejorative and they will have to come up with a new label for mentally
retarded.

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 16:07:06 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2021-02-21 3:05 p.m., Bryan Simmons wrote:
>> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 12:36:15 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> You're back to your retarded Usenet provider.
>>>>
>> I'm sure that folks who have a loved one with Down Syndrome
>> appreciate your choice of adjectives. That's a playground word.
>
>Well, that is their problem for choosing to be offended. Mentally
>retarded was a perfectly acceptable term that described their cognitive
>ability. Unfortunately, every time they had a label for degrees of
>mental ability it would eventually become a pejorative. Before that they
>had labeled them as idiots, simpletons and moron.
>
>
>Mentally was only recently officially replaced by mental disability.
>Mark my words. It won't be long before mental disability becomes a
>pejorative and they will have to come up with a new label for mentally
>retarded.

The woke people will never be happy. They'll always find new things to
be offended by. It's what they get out of bed for in the morning.

On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 2:18:53 PM UTC-6, Hank Rogers wrote:
> Bryan Simmons wrote:
> > On Saturday, February 20, 2021 at 11:16:33 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021 23:33:02 -0500, jmcquown >
> >> wrote:
> >>> On 2/20/2021 8:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
> >>
> >>>> According to Steve, Bruce showed up because he was stalking Peter
> >>>> Lucas. Is that true?
> >>>>
> >>> I have no idea where Bruce came from. I do know he does not post about
> >>> food or cooking. Shit-stirring is the name of the game.
> >> I believe I was looking for a newsgroup about food, in 2013 or
> >> thereabouts. And I found all these nice people in RFC, discussing
> >> food, politics and hummingbirds.
> >>
> > "Looking for a newsgroup about food" where you could give omnivores
> > shit for eating animals? Why didn't you find somewhere where folks
> > shared your food interests? That's obvious. Why preach to the choir?
> >
> > --Bryan
> >
> Bryan, he came here to sniff assholes.
>
And he's doing a bang up job at it! I wish that 20 years ago, when you
could still start new NGs, that I would have started alt.amputarian. It
could have been the #1 group for roadkill recipes.

Today, for the first time, I got a phone plan with data, and it's "unlimited."
Now the surveillance state can keep proper tabs on me.

--Bryan

On 2/21/2021 5:08 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:

>>
> And he's doing a bang up job at it! I wish that 20 years ago, when you
> could still start new NGs, that I would have started alt.amputarian. It
> could have been the #1 group for roadkill recipes.
>
> Today, for the first time, I got a phone plan with data, and it's "unlimited."
> Now the surveillance state can keep proper tabs on me.
>
> --Bryan
>

It works with the microchip in the Covid vaccine. You'll never be lost
again.

On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 4:16:54 PM UTC-6, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/21/2021 5:08 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>
> >>
> > And he's doing a bang up job at it! I wish that 20 years ago, when you
> > could still start new NGs, that I would have started alt.amputarian. It
> > could have been the #1 group for roadkill recipes.
> >
> > Today, for the first time, I got a phone plan with data, and it's "unlimited."
> > Now the surveillance state can keep proper tabs on me.
> >
> > --Bryan
> >
> It works with the microchip in the Covid vaccine. You'll never be lost
> again.
>
My wife and I got the 55+ plan from T-Mobile. I told her that if I'd have had a
phone with data and such, that when I got lost in Fajardo PR, I could have
easily found my way back to the AirBnB. If I'd have had a phone with me at
all, then I could have reassured my family that I wasn't dead from a car wreck,
or hadn't been mugged by crazy Puerto Ricans. I drove around for hours until
I finally found a cop. He spoke zero English, but I was capable of conveying
that I was lost. Finally, I made a gesture of flashing with my hand, and said,
"Rojo." The cop's face lit up, because there was only one flashing red light in
town, and he was able to give me directions in Spanish that I understood well
enough to get there, and from that light I knew my way back.

--Bryan

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:38:27 -0800 (PST), Bryan Simmons
> wrote:

>On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 4:16:54 PM UTC-6, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> >
>> It works with the microchip in the Covid vaccine. You'll never be lost
>> again.
>>
>My wife and I got the 55+ plan from T-Mobile. I told her that if I'd have had a
>phone with data and such, that when I got lost in Fajardo PR, I could have
>easily found my way back to the AirBnB. If I'd have had a phone with me at
>all, then I could have reassured my family that I wasn't dead from a car wreck,
>or hadn't been mugged by crazy Puerto Ricans. I drove around for hours until
>I finally found a cop. He spoke zero English, but I was capable of conveying
>that I was lost. Finally, I made a gesture of flashing with my hand, and said,
>"Rojo." The cop's face lit up, because there was only one flashing red light in
>town, and he was able to give me directions in Spanish that I understood well
>enough to get there, and from that light I knew my way back.
>
So you couldn't call John? That must have been scary.
>

On 2021 Feb 21, , Dave Smith wrote
(in article >):

> Mentally was only recently officially replaced by mental disability.
> Mark my words. It won't be long before mental disability becomes a
> pejorative and they will have to come up with a new label for mentally
> retarded.

They already have. The newest, gentlest word is "special".

On 2021-02-22 10:24 p.m., Leo wrote:
> On 2021 Feb 21, , Dave Smith wrote
> (in article >):
>
>> Mentally was only recently officially replaced by mental disability.
>> Mark my words. It won't be long before mental disability becomes a
>> pejorative and they will have to come up with a new label for mentally
>> retarded.
>
> They already have. The newest, gentlest word is "special".
>
>

They were using challenged for a while. That one went out of favour when
if became a pejorative.

On 2021 Feb 20, , jmcquown wrote
(in article >):

> Yes! Cannot refuse to eat chicken if "someone" shows up at the front
> door with it.

If someone shows up at the front door with a chicken, I can a, kill, pluck,
gut, butcher and have it in the pot in an hour. That´s a plucked chicken.
Skinning doesn´t count. Everyone who can do that say
"Aye!"
But make sure you have a pot of scalding water to dunk the dead chicken in
ready to go. I expect a few ayes.
The scalding water is necessary for plucking pheasants too. Don´t gut
either bird first!
Did anybody just learn anything? Probably not.

bloody leo