On 2/22/2021 10:11 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 9:46:04 AM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 Gary wrote:
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>> And he pays extra for AAA. 24/7 Roadside assistance is a benefit of my
>>>> auto insurance policy.
>>>
>>> Got news for you, Jill. Your auto insurance also charges for that. Look
>>> at the list of charges on your next or last auto insurance bill.
>>>
>>> I have AAA. My annual renewal last October was $57.
>>>
>>> It includes 3 trips a year from a tow truck for whatever reason.
>>> Includes many other benefits too that I would rarely need. It's a better
>>> deal than what my insurance company offered.
>>>
>>> All insurance companies are a for-profit company.
>>> A few people get more benefits than they paid for but most people pay
>>> more in premiums that they get back.
>> And you pay for those 'extra' services even if you never use any...
>> and you pay in advance... nothing is free... no one gets a refund for
>> not being towed. We don't have Triple A, instead we have Amex, it
>> includes the same auto services as AAA. Amex offers services not
>> available with any other credit card, have a dispute with a vender and
>> Amex won't pay until the dispute is settled to the customers
>> satisfaction. Some venders won't accept Amex, those are the crooked
>> venders... shop elsewhere.
>
> Some vendors don't accept Amex because their fees are considerably
> higher than MC and Visa.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>

Amex tried to show they were a status symbol. I had one for work but
I'd never pay to have a personal CC when others are free. Look at me, I
have a gold card.

On 2/22/2021 7:39 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 2/22/2021 10:11 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 9:46:04 AM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 Gary wrote:
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> And he pays extra for AAA. 24/7 Roadside assistance is a benefit of my
>>>>> auto insurance policy.
>>>>
>>>> Got news for you, Jill. Your auto insurance also charges for that. Look
>>>> at the list of charges on your next or last auto insurance bill.
>>>>
>>>> I have AAA. My annual renewal last October was $57.
>>>>
>>>> It includes 3 trips a year from a tow truck for whatever reason.
>>>> Includes many other benefits too that I would rarely need. It's a better
>>>> deal than what my insurance company offered.
>>>>
>>>> All insurance companies are a for-profit company.
>>>> A few people get more benefits than they paid for but most people pay
>>>> more in premiums that they get back.
>>> And you pay for those 'extra' services even if you never use any...
>>> and you pay in advance... nothing is free... no one gets a refund for
>>> not being towed. We don't have Triple A, instead we have Amex, it
>>> includes the same auto services as AAA. Amex offers services not
>>> available with any other credit card, have a dispute with a vender and
>>> Amex won't pay until the dispute is settled to the customers
>>> satisfaction. Some venders won't accept Amex, those are the crooked
>>> venders... shop elsewhere.
>>
>> Some vendors don't accept Amex because their fees are considerably
>> higher than MC and Visa.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>
> Amex tried to show they were a status symbol. I had one for work but
> I'd never pay to have a personal CC when others are free. Look at me, I
> have a gold card.
>


I have two free AMEX cards. Cash back on both.

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:11:16 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 9:46:04 AM UTC-5, Sheldon wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 Gary wrote:
>>>jmcquown wrote:
>>>> And he pays extra for AAA. 24/7 Roadside assistance is a benefit of my
>>>> auto insurance policy.
>>>
>>>Got news for you, Jill. Your auto insurance also charges for that. Look
>>>at the list of charges on your next or last auto insurance bill.
>>>
>>>I have AAA. My annual renewal last October was $57.
>>>
>>>It includes 3 trips a year from a tow truck for whatever reason.
>>>Includes many other benefits too that I would rarely need. It's a better
>>>deal than what my insurance company offered.
>>>
>>>All insurance companies are a for-profit company.
>>>A few people get more benefits than they paid for but most people pay
>>>more in premiums that they get back.
>> And you pay for those 'extra' services even if you never use any...
>> and you pay in advance... nothing is free... no one gets a refund for
>> not being towed. We don't have Triple A, instead we have Amex, it
>> includes the same auto services as AAA. Amex offers services not
>> available with any other credit card, have a dispute with a vender and
>> Amex won't pay until the dispute is settled to the customers
>> satisfaction. Some venders won't accept Amex, those are the crooked
>> venders... shop elsewhere.
>
> Some vendors don't accept Amex because their fees are considerably
> higher than MC and Visa.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

Apparently, Amex are also slow to pay the vendors.

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 13:28:04 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe >
wrote:

>On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 2:55:44 PM UTC-6, John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 07:18:55 +1100, M. Bruce >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 14:53:05 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >>On 2021-02-21 2:08 p.m., John Kuthe wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 05:50:21 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 09:18:28 -0700, Graham > wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On 2021-02-21 8:56 a.m., John Kuthe wrote:
>> >>>>>> And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> I just wish you'd stop posting!!!!!!
>> >>>>
>> >>>> You could killfile him, but you'd still get an endless stream of
>> >>>> replies to him by Jill, Cindy, Dave (doesn't have Julie anymore),
>> >>>> Janet UK and Bryan (obsessed with John).
>> >>>
>> >>> How about you stop frogging Jill, you sleazy hypocrite?
>> >>>
>> >>How about you stop reacting to him. It gives him the cheap thrill he is
>> >>looking for.
>> >
>> >When Julie left, Dave Smith doubled up on John Kuthe posts, exactly as
>> >I predicted.
>> What's even more predicable is your tiresome confirmation bias.
>
>NOT the REAL John Kuthe! The Faux John Kuthe!
>
>
>John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

Nice try. But we can see YOU are the fake Kuthe.

On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 4:23:07 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 1:31:18 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> > On 2/21/2021 10:56 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
> > > And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
> > >
> > > Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
> > >
> > >
> > > John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
> > >
> > Do you want to tear up the pristine environment to power you car?
> >
> > Electric cars are doing a lot of damage to the environment and not
> > industry wants to tear up Thacker Pass to make more batteries. Listen
> > to this guy.
> >
> > https://www.protectthackerpass.org/
> EV's are beloved by many. Why? Marketing.

People appreciate not having to start up the gas engine with its vibration and noise and balkiness. Most people love EVs the first time they drive it. There's also the efficiency of EVs. Instead of using electricity to refine gasoline from crude oil and transporting it to your town in tankers, and pumping it into your car, you can just bypass all that and use the power to charge up a battery. For the equivalent cost of the gas, you can travel 2 or 3 times as far on electricity. That's an energy savings on several different levels.

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:33:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 4:23:07 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 1:31:18 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> > On 2/21/2021 10:56 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> > > And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>> > >
>> > > Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> > >
>> > Do you want to tear up the pristine environment to power you car?
>> >
>> > Electric cars are doing a lot of damage to the environment and not
>> > industry wants to tear up Thacker Pass to make more batteries. Listen
>> > to this guy.
>> >
>> > https://www.protectthackerpass.org/
>> EV's are beloved by many. Why? Marketing.
>
>People appreciate not having to start up the gas engine with its vibration and noise and balkiness. Most people love EVs the first time they drive it. There's also the efficiency of EVs. Instead of using electricity to refine gasoline from crude oil and transporting it to your town in tankers, and pumping it into your car, you can just bypass all that and use the power to charge up a battery. For the equivalent cost of the gas, you can travel 2 or 3 times as far on electricity. That's an energy savings on several different levels.
>
You remove an entire step put of the process that way. Same with a
vegetarian diet. For carnivores, you need to grow the food, feed it to
the animals, kill them and eat them. For a plant based diet, you grow
the food and eat it. Less effort, no animal suffering, less pollution,
less space required for farming.

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:40:49 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:33:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> wrote:
>
>>On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 4:23:07 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>>> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 1:31:18 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>> > On 2/21/2021 10:56 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>>> > > And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>>> > >
>>> > > Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>> > >
>>> > Do you want to tear up the pristine environment to power you car?
>>> >
>>> > Electric cars are doing a lot of damage to the environment and not
>>> > industry wants to tear up Thacker Pass to make more batteries. Listen
>>> > to this guy.
>>> >
>>> > https://www.protectthackerpass.org/
>>> EV's are beloved by many. Why? Marketing.
>>
>>People appreciate not having to start up the gas engine with its vibration and noise and balkiness. Most people love EVs the first time they drive it. There's also the efficiency of EVs. Instead of using electricity to refine gasoline from crude oil and transporting it to your town in tankers, and pumping it into your car, you can just bypass all that and use the power to charge up a battery. For the equivalent cost of the gas, you can travel 2 or 3 times as far on electricity. That's an energy savings on several different levels.
>>
>You remove an entire step put of the process that way. Same with a
>vegetarian diet. For carnivores, you need to grow the food, feed it to
>the animals, kill them and eat them. For a plant based diet, you grow
>the food and eat it. Less effort, no animal suffering, less pollution,
>less space required for farming.

And missing essential micro and macro nutrients which cannot be
sourced from plants.

John Kuthe, omnivore...

On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 11:40:55 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:33:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
> >On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 4:23:07 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> >> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 1:31:18 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >> > On 2/21/2021 10:56 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
> >> > > And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
> >> > >
> >> > > Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
> >> > >
> >> > Do you want to tear up the pristine environment to power you car?
> >> >
> >> > Electric cars are doing a lot of damage to the environment and not
> >> > industry wants to tear up Thacker Pass to make more batteries. Listen
> >> > to this guy.
> >> >
> >> > https://www.protectthackerpass.org/
> >> EV's are beloved by many. Why? Marketing.
> >
> >People appreciate not having to start up the gas engine with its vibration and noise and balkiness. Most people love EVs the first time they drive it. There's also the efficiency of EVs. Instead of using electricity to refine gasoline from crude oil and transporting it to your town in tankers, and pumping it into your car, you can just bypass all that and use the power to charge up a battery. For the equivalent cost of the gas, you can travel 2 or 3 times as far on electricity. That's an energy savings on several different levels.
> >
> You remove an entire step put of the process that way. Same with a
> vegetarian diet. For carnivores, you need to grow the food, feed it to
> the animals, kill them and eat them. For a plant based diet, you grow
> the food and eat it. Less effort, no animal suffering, less pollution,
> less space required for farming.

With food, you can go all the way down to whatever level of sustainability you wish. The lowest level being one celled plants - algae. In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 11:40:55 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:33:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 4:23:07 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>> >> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 1:31:18 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> >> > On 2/21/2021 10:56 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>> >> > > And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> >> > >
>> >> > Do you want to tear up the pristine environment to power you car?
>> >> >
>> >> > Electric cars are doing a lot of damage to the environment and not
>> >> > industry wants to tear up Thacker Pass to make more batteries. Listen
>> >> > to this guy.
>> >> >
>> >> > https://www.protectthackerpass.org/
>> >> EV's are beloved by many. Why? Marketing.
>> >
>> >People appreciate not having to start up the gas engine with its vibration and noise and balkiness. Most people love EVs the first time they drive it. There's also the efficiency of EVs. Instead of using electricity to refine gasoline from crude oil and transporting it to your town in tankers, and pumping it into your car, you can just bypass all that and use the power to charge up a battery. For the equivalent cost of the gas, you can travel 2 or 3 times as far on electricity. That's an energy savings on several different levels.
>> >
>> You remove an entire step put of the process that way. Same with a
>> vegetarian diet. For carnivores, you need to grow the food, feed it to
>> the animals, kill them and eat them. For a plant based diet, you grow
>> the food and eat it. Less effort, no animal suffering, less pollution,
>> less space required for farming.
>
>With food, you can go all the way down to whatever level of sustainability you wish. The lowest level being one celled plants - algae. In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.

That's a bold statement and a half.

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800, dsi1 wrote:


> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.

Why shape it at all? I'm working on a combo Covid mask / feedbag. It's
much more trendy, plus it's scientificaly provable to be more hygenic
than a mask that needs to be removed to facilitate eating.

Right now, I need a bit of seed money for some engineering. Specifically,
we will need a nostril excluder in the algae extruder.

So you can either send me money, or volunteer as a test subject.

Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:33:22 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 4:23:07 AM UTC-10, wrote:
>>> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 1:31:18 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On 2/21/2021 10:56 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>> And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>>>
>>>> Do you want to tear up the pristine environment to power you car?
>>>>
>>>> Electric cars are doing a lot of damage to the environment and not
>>>> industry wants to tear up Thacker Pass to make more batteries. Listen
>>>> to this guy.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.protectthackerpass.org/
>>> EV's are beloved by many. Why? Marketing.
>>
>> People appreciate not having to start up the gas engine with its vibration and noise and balkiness. Most people love EVs the first time they drive it. There's also the efficiency of EVs. Instead of using electricity to refine gasoline from crude oil and transporting it to your town in tankers, and pumping it into your car, you can just bypass all that and use the power to charge up a battery. For the equivalent cost of the gas, you can travel 2 or 3 times as far on electricity. That's an energy savings on several different levels.
>>
> You remove an entire step put of the process that way. Same with a
> vegetarian diet. For carnivores, you need to grow the food, feed it to
> the animals, kill them and eat them. For a plant based diet, you grow
> the food and eat it. Less effort, no animal suffering, less pollution,
> less space required for farming.
>

Unfortunately it also caused you to preach.

Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
>> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.
>
> Why shape it at all? I'm working on a combo Covid mask / feedbag. It's
> much more trendy, plus it's scientificaly provable to be more hygenic
> than a mask that needs to be removed to facilitate eating.
>
> Right now, I need a bit of seed money for some engineering. Specifically,
> we will need a nostril excluder in the algae extruder.
>
> So you can either send me money, or volunteer as a test subject.
>

Why not give it the acid test ... let master druce test it.

On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 1:52:20 PM UTC-10, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
> > In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.
> Why shape it at all? I'm working on a combo Covid mask / feedbag. It's
> much more trendy, plus it's scientificaly provable to be more hygenic
> than a mask that needs to be removed to facilitate eating.
>
> Right now, I need a bit of seed money for some engineering. Specifically,
> we will need a nostril excluder in the algae extruder.
>
> So you can either send me money, or volunteer as a test subject.

As it goes, I don't got no money. The concept of algae for food is not a new one. My guess is that 3D printed algae will be in small, bite sized disks. We don't want no stinkin' crumbs in space!
https://www.sciencealert.com/cyanoba...n-life-support

wrote:

> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 11:46:33 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
> > On 2/21/2021 11:18 AM, Graham wrote:
> > > On 2021-02-21 8:56 a.m., John Kuthe wrote:
> > >> And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
> > >>
> > >> Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
> > >>
> > > I just wish you'd stop posting!!!!!!
> > >
> > You're too stupid to use a killfilter.
> >
> > Jill
> I don't know if you're the real Jill, but you sure are funny.

John, Jill have a life time spammer who pretends to be her. They are
easy to spot (the email address is different)

On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 20:32:45 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:

wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 11:46:33 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>> > On 2/21/2021 11:18 AM, Graham wrote:
>> > > On 2021-02-21 8:56 a.m., John Kuthe wrote:
>> > >> And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>> > >>
>> > >> Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> > >>
>> > > I just wish you'd stop posting!!!!!!
>> > >
>> > You're too stupid to use a killfilter.
>> >
>> > Jill
>> I don't know if you're the real Jill, but you sure are funny.
>
>John, Jill have a life time spammer who pretends to be her. They are
>easy to spot (the email address is different)

Is Carol Shenk really this stupid? Or is it some sort of ironic art
project?

On Monday, February 22, 2021 at 5:03:21 PM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800 (PST), dsi1
> > wrote:
>> With food, you can go all the way down to whatever level of sustainability you wish. The lowest
>> level being one celled plants - algae. In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made
>> from algae.

> That's a bold statement and a half.

When he says "we", he doesn't necessarily mean the people here on rec.food.cooking.
He means humans will be eating algae shortly before they're eating Soylent Green.

Cindy Hamilton

dsi1 wrote:
> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.

And there goes the traditional family get together for Thanksgiving.


Speaking of the future, Sunday I watched the very first episode of the
Jetsons (1962) on MeTV. That was cool.

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:29:53 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>dsi1 wrote:
>> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.
>
>And there goes the traditional family get together for Thanksgiving.
>
>
>Speaking of the future, Sunday I watched the very first episode of the
>Jetsons (1962) on MeTV. That was cool.
>
I hear a collective sigh of relief. I can't tell if it's from humans
or turkeys.

On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:29:59 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
> > In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.
> And there goes the traditional family get together for Thanksgiving.
>
>
> Speaking of the future, Sunday I watched the very first episode of the
> Jetsons (1962) on MeTV. That was cool.

You should enjoy that turkey while you can. I don't imagine they'll be around in the future. What's Thanksgiving going to look like in twenty years? It might be pretty strange.
The Jetsons was a good looking show - very clean and bright colors. Jane was a fox and George was the usual oaf. At least he wasn't drawn as another fat oaf.

dsi1 wrote:
> The Jetsons was a good looking show - very clean and bright colors.

Even better cartoon (more modern) for the clean bright colors and pretty
nice backgrounds is... "Paw Patrol."

I've never watched an entire cartoon but occasionally I will switch to
it during commercials. I love the graphics. Well done.

A friend of mine found a 'Paw Patrol' metal lunchbox and gifted it to
me. I love it. It's not actually a lunch box. It contained a game. She
kept the game for her kids and gave me the metal "lunch box" with all
the cool pictures.

I don't have fancy-pants toys but I do love that one.

On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 3:09:54 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
> > The Jetsons was a good looking show - very clean and bright colors.
> Even better cartoon (more modern) for the clean bright colors and pretty
> nice backgrounds is... "Paw Patrol."
>
> I've never watched an entire cartoon but occasionally I will switch to
> it during commercials. I love the graphics. Well done.
>
> A friend of mine found a 'Paw Patrol' metal lunchbox and gifted it to
> me. I love it. It's not actually a lunch box. It contained a game. She
> kept the game for her kids and gave me the metal "lunch box" with all
> the cool pictures.
>
> I don't have fancy-pants toys but I do love that one.

It's modern computer generated 3D animation, probably produced in Korea.

On 2/24/2021 7:09 AM, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
>> The Jetsons was a good looking show - very clean and bright colors.
>
> Even better cartoon (more modern) for the clean bright colors and pretty
> nice backgrounds is... "Paw Patrol."
>
> I've never watched an entire cartoon but occasionally I will switch to
> it during commercials. I love the graphics. Well done.
>
> A friend of mine found a 'Paw Patrol' metal lunchbox and gifted it to
> me. I love it. It's not actually a lunch box. It contained a game. She
> kept the game for her kids and gave me the metal "lunch box" with all
> the cool pictures.
>
> I don't have fancy-pants toys but I do love that one.Â*
>
I told a guy at work that I wouldn't let my kid watch Paw Patrol
because it might teach him to trust cops. Without missing a beat
the guy replied, "And dogs!"


--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2/22/2021 8:54 AM, Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>> And he pays extra for AAA.Â* 24/7 Roadside assistance is a benefit of my
>> auto insurance policy.
>
> Got news for you, Jill. Your auto insurance also charges for that. Look
> at the list of charges on your next or last auto insurance bill.
>
> I have AAA. My annual renewal last October was $57.
>
Really? My annual insurance bill for full coverage including 24/7 no
limit roadside assistance is about $400 a year. On my policy, roadside
assistance means tow, a can of gas, a battery boost, change a flat...
Call anytime. They have a network.

> It includes 3 trips a year from a tow truck for whatever reason.
> Includes many other benefits too that I would rarely need. It's a better
> deal than what my insurance company offered.
>
LOL Okay, Gary.

> All insurance companies are a for-profit company.

Yes, they are.

> A few people get more benefits than they paid for but most people pay
> more in premiums that they get back.
>
I get dividends back each year because I don't have accidents.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/22/2021 8:54 AM, Gary wrote:
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> And he pays extra for AAA.Â* 24/7 Roadside assistance is a
>>> benefit of my
>>> auto insurance policy.
>>
>> Got news for you, Jill. Your auto insurance also charges for
>> that. Look at the list of charges on your next or last auto
>> insurance bill.
>>
>> I have AAA. My annual renewal last October was $57.
>>
> Really?* My annual insurance bill for full coverage including 24/7
> no limit roadside assistance is about $400 a year.* On my policy,
> roadside assistance means tow, a can of gas, a battery boost,
> change a flat... Call anytime.* They have a network.
>
>> It includes 3 trips a year from a tow truck for whatever reason.
>> Includes many other benefits too that I would rarely need. It's a
>> better deal than what my insurance company offered.
>>
> LOL* Okay, Gary.
>
>> All insurance companies are a for-profit company.
>
> Yes, they are.
>
>> A few people get more benefits than they paid for but most people
>> pay more in premiums that they get back.
>>
> I get dividends back each year because I don't have accidents.
>
> Jill

And your shit don't stink. That saves 5%

On 2/22/2021 6:52 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
>> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.
>
> Why shape it at all? I'm working on a combo Covid mask / feedbag. It's
> much more trendy, plus it's scientificaly provable to be more hygenic
> than a mask that needs to be removed to facilitate eating.
>
> Right now, I need a bit of seed money for some engineering. Specifically,
> we will need a nostril excluder in the algae extruder.
>
> So you can either send me money, or volunteer as a test subject.
>
Go for it, Mike! Maybe dsi1 will invest! He's really intent on 3D
printed food. And his pal Ophelia will be right there with him!

Jill

On 2/22/2021 9:32 PM, cshenk wrote:
> wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, February 21, 2021 at 11:46:33 AM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 2/21/2021 11:18 AM, Graham wrote:
>>>> On 2021-02-21 8:56 a.m., John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>> And She's plugged into my L2 charging port in my back yard!
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't you wish YOU didn't buy or burn ANY gasoline!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>>>
>>>> I just wish you'd stop posting!!!!!!
>>>>
>>> You're too stupid to use a killfilter.
>>>
>>> Jill
>> I don't know if you're the real Jill, but you sure are funny.
>
> John, Jill have a life time spammer who pretends to be her. They are
> easy to spot (the email address is different)
>
Easy to spot except John chooses not to be able to filter them out.

Jill

On 2/25/2021 7:29 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> Easy to spot except John chooses not to be able to filter them out.
>
> Jill
>
You snipped my food pic for no reason, you worry
way too much. It's no wonder people enjoy ****ing
on you in here.

On 2/22/2021 8:20 AM, wrote:
> Thuggish that idea is.
>
That's a Yodaical sentence.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 2:18:27 PM UTC-10, wrote:
> On 2/22/2021 6:52 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800, dsi1 wrote:
> >
> >
> >> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae..
> >
> > Why shape it at all? I'm working on a combo Covid mask / feedbag. It's
> > much more trendy, plus it's scientificaly provable to be more hygenic
> > than a mask that needs to be removed to facilitate eating.
> >
> > Right now, I need a bit of seed money for some engineering. Specifically,
> > we will need a nostril excluder in the algae extruder.
> >
> > So you can either send me money, or volunteer as a test subject.
> >
> Go for it, Mike! Maybe dsi1 will invest! He's really intent on 3D
> printed food. And his pal Ophelia will be right there with him!
>
> Jill
I ain't invested or intent on nothing. I just report on trends in technology. It ain't my fault that the electric airplane/car is inevitable and yoose believes that I really, really, want it to happen. Mostly, it's you, not me. Yoose guys are invested in 30 year old computer technology. That's some pretty scary stuff.

dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 2:18:27 PM UTC-10, wrote:
>> On 2/22/2021 6:52 PM, Mike Duffy wrote:
>>> On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:58:59 -0800, dsi1 wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> In the future, we'll be eating 3D printed food modules made from algae.
>>>
>>> Why shape it at all? I'm working on a combo Covid mask / feedbag. It's
>>> much more trendy, plus it's scientificaly provable to be more hygenic
>>> than a mask that needs to be removed to facilitate eating.
>>>
>>> Right now, I need a bit of seed money for some engineering. Specifically,
>>> we will need a nostril excluder in the algae extruder.
>>>
>>> So you can either send me money, or volunteer as a test subject.
>>>
>> Go for it, Mike! Maybe dsi1 will invest! He's really intent on 3D
>> printed food. And his pal Ophelia will be right there with him!
>>
>> Jill
> I ain't invested or intent on nothing. I just report on trends in technology. It ain't my fault that the electric airplane/car is inevitable and yoose believes that I really, really, want it to happen. Mostly, it's you, not me. Yoose guys are invested in 30 year old computer technology. That's some pretty scary stuff.
>

google is the future!