On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 14:10:56 -0500, Bruce > wrote:

>On 3/11/2021 2:08 PM, Pamela wrote:
>> On 21:33 10 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>
>>> On Tue, 09 Mar 2021 23:01:27 GMT, Pamela >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 22:50 9 Mar 2021, Sqwertz said:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:09:26 -0500, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/9/2021 4:51 PM, Sheldon Martin wrote:
>>>>>>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt
>>>>>>> nothing, or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out
>>>>>>> her massive bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two
>>>>>>> weeks, hoping I get her again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Got mine yesterday and go April 5 for the second.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's unanimous. I got mine yesterday, too. I go back the 29th.
>>>>>
>>>>> -sw
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't seem long ago when you posted Covid didn't pose a risk
>>>> and you even calculated the people you would have to touch even to
>>>> come close to it.
>>>>
>>>> Even Covidiots eventually see sense ... or die.
>>>
>>> ...die at a rate of less than a single percentage point. Yes,
>>> let's all get behind an basically untested and unproven vaccine,
>>> using technology never trialed on humans before, with no evidence
>>> of efficacy or reducing the spread of the virus. OK, makes sense.
>>
>> Neodome poster, that's the arithmetic of Covidiots.
> >
>Says the guy posting as a girl.

Says the faggot posting as a man.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:

>
> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>

Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People often miss
it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so to be properly noticed.

On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 4:44:12 PM UTC-5, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>
> >
> > Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
> >
> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People often miss
> it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so to be properly noticed.
2nd shot today at work. They come to me, no drive, no wait.

On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:

> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>
>>
>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>
>
> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so to
> be properly noticed.

Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are still
terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.

Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect to be
too much.

Maybe they have psychosis.

On 3/10/2021 11:31 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
>> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
>> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
>> again.
>
> We were in a Sears store that was shutting down the other day. They were selling the fixtures and some manikins. One of the manikins had some pretty big bosoms and seemed to be big gal sized. Another, was a kid sized one with freakishly large arms - that one gives me the creeps. It's a hell of a life being a manikin.
>
> https://photos.app.goo.gl/FSScbLu3yeGiJgyAA
>

The ancient Hawaiians would have drowned that manikin at birth. lol

On 3/12/2021 10:35 AM, Gary wrote:
> On 3/10/2021 11:31 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>> On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
>>> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
>>> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
>>> again.
>>
>> We were in a Sears store that was shutting down the other day. They
>> were selling the fixtures and some manikins. One of the manikins had
>> some pretty big bosoms and seemed to be big gal sized. Another, was a
>> kid sized one with freakishly large arms - that one gives me the
>> creeps. It's a hell of a life being a manikin.
>>
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/FSScbLu3yeGiJgyAA
>>
>
> The ancient Hawaiians would have drowned that manikin at birth.Â* lol
>
>
How about you guys spell it correctly? I remember a 'Twilight Zone'
episode where once a year each *mannequin* was allowed to come to life
for a short period of time, once a year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_After_Hours

One such mannequin was looking for a gold thimble for her mother; she
had seen it advertised in the store. She got on the elevator and it
took her to a floor that didn't exist. Empty except for a dusty glass
counterop and a saleswoman who sold her the thimble but kept telling her
it's time to come back now...

Jill

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 11:09:18 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 3/12/2021 10:35 AM, Gary wrote:
>> On 3/10/2021 11:31 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>>>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
>>>> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
>>>> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
>>>> again.
>>>
>>> We were in a Sears store that was shutting down the other day. They
>>> were selling the fixtures and some manikins. One of the manikins had
>>> some pretty big bosoms and seemed to be big gal sized. Another, was a
>>> kid sized one with freakishly large arms - that one gives me the
>>> creeps. It's a hell of a life being a manikin.
>>>
>>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/FSScbLu3yeGiJgyAA
>>>
>>
>> The ancient Hawaiians would have drowned that manikin at birth.* lol
>>
>>
>How about you guys spell it correctly? I remember a 'Twilight Zone'
>episode where once a year each *mannequin* was allowed to come to life
>for a short period of time, once a year.
>
>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_After_Hours
>
>One such mannequin was looking for a gold thimble for her mother; she
>had seen it advertised in the store. She got on the elevator and it
>took her to a floor that didn't exist. Empty except for a dusty glass
>counterop and a saleswoman who sold her the thimble but kept telling her
>it's time to come back now...
>
>Jill


The Twilight Zone episode always reminded me of a much earlier short
story and TV musical.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evening_Primrose_

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela >
wrote:

>On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>
>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>
>>
>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
>> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so to
>> be properly noticed.
>
>Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are still
>terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>
>Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
>negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect to be
>too much.
>
>Maybe they have psychosis.

Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore an
'anti-vaxxer'?

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 3/10/2021 2:44 PM, Bruce wrote:
> Reminds me of snake handlers. Isn't that in Virginia? People handling
> deadly snakes because the Lord will protect them. Religion can do
> strange things to the human mind.

Very western Virginia (or West Virginia). It's in the mountains aka the
bible belt. None of that nonsense around here that I've ever heard about.

My sister thought about visiting a snake church once. You can imagine my
response to such a crazy idea.

On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:

> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela >
> wrote:
>
>>On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>
>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
>>> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so to
>>> be properly noticed.
>>
>>Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are still
>>terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>
>>Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
>>negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect
>>to be too much.
>>
>>Maybe they have psychosis.
>
> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore an
> 'anti-vaxxer'?

You got it.

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:10:51 GMT, Pamela >
wrote:

>On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>>
>>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
>>>> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so to
>>>> be properly noticed.
>>>
>>>Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are still
>>>terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>>
>>>Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
>>>negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect
>>>to be too much.
>>>
>>>Maybe they have psychosis.
>>
>> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore an
>> 'anti-vaxxer'?
>
>You got it.

LOL. So, according to you, one can willingly have vaccines - just wary
about certain vaccines.........and these people are 'anti-vaxxers'?

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 07:00:02 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>On 3/10/2021 2:44 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> Reminds me of snake handlers. Isn't that in Virginia? People handling
>> deadly snakes because the Lord will protect them. Religion can do
>> strange things to the human mind.
>
>Very western Virginia (or West Virginia). It's in the mountains aka the
>bible belt. None of that nonsense around here that I've ever heard about.
>
>My sister thought about visiting a snake church once. You can imagine my
>response to such a crazy idea.

Maybe from the same human interest angle as watching a tribal dance in
Papua New Guinea?

There must be bible thumpers worldwide who refuse the vaccine because
it's up to the Lord whether we get covid.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 18:18 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:10:51 GMT, Pamela >
> wrote:
>>On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela
>>> > wrote:
>>>>On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
>>>>> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so
>>>>> to be properly noticed.
>>>>
>>>>Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are
>>>>still terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>>>
>>>>Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
>>>>negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect
>>>>to be too much.
>>>>
>>>>Maybe they have psychosis.
>>>
>>> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore an
>>> 'anti-vaxxer'?
>>
>>You got it.
>
> LOL. So, according to you, one can willingly have vaccines - just
> wary about certain vaccines.........and these people are
> 'anti-vaxxers'?

Hi Neodome. Just take the vaccine and stop being precious. Or don't
take it and stop moaning.

The wild disaster scenraios of anti-vaxxers have not proven true and
millions have had the shot without problem.

On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
> again.

I got my shot today. I forgot to check out the RN's tits but my guess is that they were on the small side. That's okay with me. In an emergency situation, big tits might just get in the way. The shots were administered in an immigration processing facility. I took a picture on the outside. I can't say what that thing in the sky was. Looks like a drone.

https://photos.app.goo.gl/oxhkzkcWCChncNBK9

On 3/14/2021 3:18 AM, Pamela wrote:
> On 18:18 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:10:51 GMT, Pamela >
>> wrote:
>>> On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>>>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
>>>>>> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so
>>>>>> to be properly noticed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are
>>>>> still terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>>>>
>>>>> Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
>>>>> negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect
>>>>> to be too much.
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe they have psychosis.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore an
>>>> 'anti-vaxxer'?
>>>
>>> You got it.
>>
>> LOL. So, according to you, one can willingly have vaccines - just
>> wary about certain vaccines.........and these people are
>> 'anti-vaxxers'?
>
> Hi Neodome. Just take the vaccine and stop being precious. Or don't
> take it and stop moaning.
>
> The wild disaster scenraios of anti-vaxxers have not proven true and
> millions have had the shot without problem.
>


You are missing the point - two points, actually.

1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved they
need YEARS of study. Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has
elapsed.

2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does not
make one an anti-vaxxer.

That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding these
vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.

On 12:33 14 Mar 2021, Taxed and Spent said:
> On 3/14/2021 3:18 AM, Pamela wrote:
>> On 18:18 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:10:51 GMT, Pamela
>>> > wrote:
>>>> On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>>>>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities.
>>>>>>> People often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real
>>>>>>> name so to be properly noticed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are
>>>>>> still terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid
>>>>>> is negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side
>>>>>> effect to be too much.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe they have psychosis.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore
>>>>> an 'anti-vaxxer'?
>>>>
>>>> You got it.
>>>
>>> LOL. So, according to you, one can willingly have vaccines -
>>> just wary about certain vaccines.........and these people are
>>> 'anti-vaxxers'?
>>
>> Hi Neodome. Just take the vaccine and stop being precious. Or
>> don't take it and stop moaning.
>>
>> The wild disaster scenraios of anti-vaxxers have not proven true
>> and millions have had the shot without problem.
>
> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>
> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved
> they need YEARS of study. Bad things sometime happen after a lot
> of time has elapsed.
>
> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does
> not make one an anti-vaxxer.
>
> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding
> these vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.

The current Covid vaccines are not "experimental" at all. They are
fully tested and approved by health regulators in different
countries around the world.

To date, 350 million have had the vaccine worldwide without problem.

Those who still retain massive irrational fear of the vaccine,
despite throught-leader Trump's demise, might want to consider
psychotherapy.

On 3/14/2021 7:29 AM, Pamela wrote:
> On 12:33 14 Mar 2021, Taxed and Spent said:
>> On 3/14/2021 3:18 AM, Pamela wrote:
>>> On 18:18 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:10:51 GMT, Pamela
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>>>>>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities.
>>>>>>>> People often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real
>>>>>>>> name so to be properly noticed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are
>>>>>>> still terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid
>>>>>>> is negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side
>>>>>>> effect to be too much.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe they have psychosis.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore
>>>>>> an 'anti-vaxxer'?
>>>>>
>>>>> You got it.
>>>>
>>>> LOL. So, according to you, one can willingly have vaccines -
>>>> just wary about certain vaccines.........and these people are
>>>> 'anti-vaxxers'?
>>>
>>> Hi Neodome. Just take the vaccine and stop being precious. Or
>>> don't take it and stop moaning.
>>>
>>> The wild disaster scenraios of anti-vaxxers have not proven true
>>> and millions have had the shot without problem.
>>
>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>
>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved
>> they need YEARS of study. Bad things sometime happen after a lot
>> of time has elapsed.
>>
>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does
>> not make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>
>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding
>> these vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>
> The current Covid vaccines are not "experimental" at all. They are
> fully tested and approved by health regulators in different
> countries around the world.
>
> To date, 350 million have had the vaccine worldwide without problem.
>
> Those who still retain massive irrational fear of the vaccine,
> despite throught-leader Trump's demise, might want to consider
> psychotherapy.
>

you totally missed it. who is irrational?

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:


>You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>
>1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved they
>need YEARS of study.

Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid vaccines
out there right now, yeah?

> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has
>elapsed.

Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required to
report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new drugs,
either.

The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an adverse
reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show up. This is just
numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.

I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the market
for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so much as
an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my company
had to file that with the FDA.

No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show up
anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but trying to
scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty lame.
>
>2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does not
>make one an anti-vaxxer.

These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them because
of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're an
anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>
>That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding these
>vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.

Um...yeah, you did.

On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>
>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>
>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved they
>> need YEARS of study.
>
> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid vaccines
> out there right now, yeah?
>
>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has
>> elapsed.
>
> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required to
> report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new drugs,
> either.
>
> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an adverse
> reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show up. This is just
> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>
> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the market
> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so much as
> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my company
> had to file that with the FDA.
>
> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show up
> anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but trying to
> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty lame.
>>
>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does not
>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>
> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them because
> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're an
> anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>
>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding these
>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>
> Um...yeah, you did.
>


Um, no I didn't.

They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.

Take the shot. I am not saying not to.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:59:09 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>>
>>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved they
>>> need YEARS of study.
>>
>> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid vaccines
>> out there right now, yeah?
>>
>>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has
>>> elapsed.
>>
>> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required to
>> report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new drugs,
>> either.
>>
>> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an adverse
>> reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show up. This is just
>> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>>
>> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the market
>> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so much as
>> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my company
>> had to file that with the FDA.
>>
>> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show up
>> anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but trying to
>> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty lame.
>>>
>>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does not
>>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>
>> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them because
>> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're an
>> anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>>
>>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding these
>>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>>
>> Um...yeah, you did.
>>
>
>
>Um, no I didn't.

Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon. You're a
dumb duck.
>
>They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
>been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.

They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word for
fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.

https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...ines-explained
>
>Take the shot. I am not saying not to.

Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.

On 3/14/2021 8:18 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:59:09 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>>>
>>>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully approved they
>>>> need YEARS of study.
>>>
>>> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid vaccines
>>> out there right now, yeah?
>>>
>>>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has
>>>> elapsed.
>>>
>>> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required to
>>> report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new drugs,
>>> either.
>>>
>>> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an adverse
>>> reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show up. This is just
>>> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>>>
>>> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the market
>>> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so much as
>>> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my company
>>> had to file that with the FDA.
>>>
>>> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show up
>>> anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but trying to
>>> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty lame.
>>>>
>>>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines does not
>>>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>>
>>> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them because
>>> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're an
>>> anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>>>
>>>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding these
>>>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>>>
>>> Um...yeah, you did.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Um, no I didn't.
>
> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon. You're a
> dumb duck.
>>
>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
>> been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.
>
> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word for
> fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>
> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...ines-explained
>>
>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>
> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.
>


What are the plans for continued monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines
authorized by FDA for emergency use?

FDA expects vaccine manufacturers to include in their EUA requests a
plan for active follow-up for safety, including deaths,
hospitalizations, and other serious or clinically significant adverse
events, among individuals who receive the vaccine under an EUA, to
inform ongoing benefit-risk determinations to support continuation of
the EUA.

FDA also expects manufacturers who receive an EUA to continue their
clinical trials to obtain additional safety and effectiveness
information and pursue licensure (approval).

Post-authorization vaccine safety monitoring is a federal government
responsibility shared primarily by FDA and the U.S. Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC), along with other agencies involved in
healthcare delivery. Post-authorization safety monitoring during the
COVID-19 pandemic vaccination program will aim to continuously monitor
the safety of COVID-19 vaccines to rapidly detect safety problems if
they exist. There will be multiple, complementary systems in place with
validated analytic methods that can rapidly detect signals for possible
vaccine safety problems. The U.S. government has a well-established
post-authorization/post-approval vaccine safety monitoring
infrastructure that will be scaled up to meet the needs of a large-scale
COVID-19 vaccination program. The U.S. government €“ in partnership with
health systems, academic centers, and private sector partners €“ will use
multiple existing vaccine safety monitoring systems to monitor COVID-19
vaccines in the post-authorization/approval period. Some of these
systems are the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the
Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety
(BEST) Initiative, and Medicare claims data.

On 15:30 14 Mar 2021, Taxed and Spent said:

> On 3/14/2021 8:18 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:59:09 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully
>>>>> approved the
> y
>>>>> need YEARS of study.
>>>>
>>>> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid
>>>> vaccines out there right now, yeah?
>>>>
>>>>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has elapsed.
>>>>
>>>> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required
>>>> to report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new
>>>> drugs, either.
>>>>
>>>> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an
>>>> adverse reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show
>>>> up. This is jus
> t
>>>> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>>>>
>>>> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the
>>>> market
>
>>>> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so
>>>> much a
> s
>>>> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my
>>>> compan
> y
>>>> had to file that with the FDA.
>>>>
>>>> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show
>>>> up anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but
>>>> trying t
> o
>>>> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty
>>>> lame.
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines
>>>>> does not
>
>>>>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>>>
>>>> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them
>>>> because
>
>>>> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're
>>>> an anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>>>>
>>>>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding
>>>>> these
>
>>>>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>>>>
>>>> Um...yeah, you did.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Um, no I didn't.
>>
>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon.
>> You're a dumb duck.
>>>
>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They
>>> have been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still
>>> underway.
>>
>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word
>> for fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>
>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/
>> emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
>>>
>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>
>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any
>> longer.
>>
>
>
> What are the plans for continued monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines
> authorized by FDA for emergency use?
>
> FDA expects vaccine manufacturers to include in their EUA requests
> a plan for active follow-up for safety, including deaths,
> hospitalizations, and other serious or clinically significant
> adverse events, among individuals who receive the vaccine under an
> EUA, to inform ongoing benefit-risk determinations to support
> continuation of the EUA.
>
> FDA also expects manufacturers who receive an EUA to continue
> their clinical trials to obtain additional safety and
> effectiveness information and pursue licensure (approval).
>
> Post-authorization vaccine safety monitoring is a federal
> government responsibility shared primarily by FDA and the U.S.
> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), along with other
> agencies involved in healthcare delivery. Post-authorization
> safety monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic vaccination program
> will aim to continuously monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines
> to rapidly detect safety problems if they exist. There will be
> multiple, complementary systems in place with validated analytic
> methods that can rapidly detect signals for possible vaccine
> safety problems. The U.S. government has a well-established
> post-authorization/post-approval vaccine safety monitoring
> infrastructure that will be scaled up to meet the needs of a
> large-scale COVID-19 vaccination program. The U.S. government €“
> in partnership with health systems, academic centers, and private
> sector partners €“ will use multiple existing vaccine safety
> monitoring systems to monitor COVID-19 vaccines in the
> post-authorization/approval period. Some of these systems are the
> Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety
> Datalink (VSD), the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST)
> Initiative, and Medicare claims data.

See a shrink. Say others have detected catastrophising and paranoid
thinking.

350 million people who have taken the vaccine are wrong but you and
a tiny group of deluded thinkers know the real truth? Yeah, right.

If you don't want the vaccine, don't take it. It's your loss but no
one really cares.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 10:18:57 GMT, Pamela >
wrote:

>On 18:18 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 13:10:51 GMT, Pamela >
>> wrote:
>>>On 04:59 13 Mar 2021, Bruce said:
>>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:04:59 GMT, Pamela
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>On 21:43 11 Mar 2021, Ed Pawlowski said:
>>>>>> On 3/11/2021 3:50 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Uh-huh. You're obtuse as ****.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you for recognizing one of my better qualities. People
>>>>>> often miss it. Unlike some, I even post under my real name so
>>>>>> to be properly noticed.
>>>>>
>>>>>Millions have had the vaccine but paranoid anti-vaxxers are
>>>>>still terrified like rabbits caught in headlights.
>>>>>
>>>>>Strange how they find a 1 in 100 chance of death from Covid is
>>>>>negligible but a 1 in 1,000,000 chance of a unproven side effect
>>>>>to be too much.
>>>>>
>>>>>Maybe they have psychosis.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone who has doubts about the covid 'vaccines' is therefore an
>>>> 'anti-vaxxer'?
>>>
>>>You got it.
>>
>> LOL. So, according to you, one can willingly have vaccines - just
>> wary about certain vaccines.........and these people are
>> 'anti-vaxxers'?
>
>Hi Neodome. Just take the vaccine and stop being precious. Or don't
>take it and stop moaning.
>
>The wild disaster scenraios of anti-vaxxers have not proven true and
>millions have had the shot without problem.

A completely nonsensical response. Not surprised at all, yer a head
case. YOU were the one moaning here, you incontinent and incoherent
old ****.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

Pamela wrote:
> On 15:30 14 Mar 2021, Taxed and Spent said:
>
>> On 3/14/2021 8:18 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:59:09 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully
>>>>>> approved the
>> y
>>>>>> need YEARS of study.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid
>>>>> vaccines out there right now, yeah?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has elapsed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required
>>>>> to report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new
>>>>> drugs, either.
>>>>>
>>>>> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an
>>>>> adverse reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show
>>>>> up. This is jus
>> t
>>>>> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the
>>>>> market
>>
>>>>> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so
>>>>> much a
>> s
>>>>> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my
>>>>> compan
>> y
>>>>> had to file that with the FDA.
>>>>>
>>>>> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show
>>>>> up anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but
>>>>> trying t
>> o
>>>>> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty
>>>>> lame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines
>>>>>> does not
>>
>>>>>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them
>>>>> because
>>
>>>>> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're
>>>>> an anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding
>>>>>> these
>>
>>>>>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Um...yeah, you did.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um, no I didn't.
>>>
>>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon.
>>> You're a dumb duck.
>>>>
>>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They
>>>> have been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still
>>>> underway.
>>>
>>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word
>>> for fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>>
>>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/
>>> emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
>>>>
>>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>>
>>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any
>>> longer.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What are the plans for continued monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines
>> authorized by FDA for emergency use?
>>
>> FDA expects vaccine manufacturers to include in their EUA requests
>> a plan for active follow-up for safety, including deaths,
>> hospitalizations, and other serious or clinically significant
>> adverse events, among individuals who receive the vaccine under an
>> EUA, to inform ongoing benefit-risk determinations to support
>> continuation of the EUA.
>>
>> FDA also expects manufacturers who receive an EUA to continue
>> their clinical trials to obtain additional safety and
>> effectiveness information and pursue licensure (approval).
>>
>> Post-authorization vaccine safety monitoring is a federal
>> government responsibility shared primarily by FDA and the U.S.
>> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), along with other
>> agencies involved in healthcare delivery. Post-authorization
>> safety monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic vaccination program
>> will aim to continuously monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines
>> to rapidly detect safety problems if they exist. There will be
>> multiple, complementary systems in place with validated analytic
>> methods that can rapidly detect signals for possible vaccine
>> safety problems. The U.S. government has a well-established
>> post-authorization/post-approval vaccine safety monitoring
>> infrastructure that will be scaled up to meet the needs of a
>> large-scale COVID-19 vaccination program. The U.S. government €“
>> in partnership with health systems, academic centers, and private
>> sector partners €“ will use multiple existing vaccine safety
>> monitoring systems to monitor COVID-19 vaccines in the
>> post-authorization/approval period. Some of these systems are the
>> Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety
>> Datalink (VSD), the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST)
>> Initiative, and Medicare claims data.
>
> See a shrink. Say others have detected catastrophising and paranoid
> thinking.
>
> 350 million people who have taken the vaccine are wrong but you and
> a tiny group of deluded thinkers know the real truth? Yeah, right.
>
> If you don't want the vaccine, don't take it. It's your loss but no
> one really cares.
>

It makes Dr. Fauci cry.

Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:12:56 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
>>> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
>>> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
>>> again.
>>
>> I got my shot today. I forgot to check out the RN's tits but my guess is that they were on the small side. That's okay with me. In an emergency situation, big tits might just get in the way. The shots were administered in an immigration processing facility. I took a picture on the outside. I can't say what that thing in the sky was. Looks like a drone.
>>
>> https://photos.app.goo.gl/oxhkzkcWCChncNBK9
>
> <Leo>
> I don't see a thing in the sky, but if you did, it must be a drone
> from the Marxist government, checking on the distribution of thought
> control medication.
> </Leo>
>

<Master druce >
<*SNIFF*>
</Master druce >

On 3/14/2021 10:07 AM, Pamela wrote:
> On 15:30 14 Mar 2021, Taxed and Spent said:
>
>> On 3/14/2021 8:18 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:59:09 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully
>>>>>> approved the
>> y
>>>>>> need YEARS of study.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid
>>>>> vaccines out there right now, yeah?
>>>>>
>>>>>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has elapsed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required
>>>>> to report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new
>>>>> drugs, either.
>>>>>
>>>>> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an
>>>>> adverse reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show
>>>>> up. This is jus
>> t
>>>>> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the
>>>>> market
>>
>>>>> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so
>>>>> much a
>> s
>>>>> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my
>>>>> compan
>> y
>>>>> had to file that with the FDA.
>>>>>
>>>>> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show
>>>>> up anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but
>>>>> trying t
>> o
>>>>> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty
>>>>> lame.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines
>>>>>> does not
>>
>>>>>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>>>>
>>>>> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them
>>>>> because
>>
>>>>> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're
>>>>> an anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding
>>>>>> these
>>
>>>>>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Um...yeah, you did.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Um, no I didn't.
>>>
>>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon.
>>> You're a dumb duck.
>>>>
>>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They
>>>> have been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still
>>>> underway.
>>>
>>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word
>>> for fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>>
>>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/
>>> emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
>>>>
>>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>>
>>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any
>>> longer.
>>>
>>
>>
>> What are the plans for continued monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines
>> authorized by FDA for emergency use?
>>
>> FDA expects vaccine manufacturers to include in their EUA requests
>> a plan for active follow-up for safety, including deaths,
>> hospitalizations, and other serious or clinically significant
>> adverse events, among individuals who receive the vaccine under an
>> EUA, to inform ongoing benefit-risk determinations to support
>> continuation of the EUA.
>>
>> FDA also expects manufacturers who receive an EUA to continue
>> their clinical trials to obtain additional safety and
>> effectiveness information and pursue licensure (approval).
>>
>> Post-authorization vaccine safety monitoring is a federal
>> government responsibility shared primarily by FDA and the U.S.
>> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), along with other
>> agencies involved in healthcare delivery. Post-authorization
>> safety monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic vaccination program
>> will aim to continuously monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines
>> to rapidly detect safety problems if they exist. There will be
>> multiple, complementary systems in place with validated analytic
>> methods that can rapidly detect signals for possible vaccine
>> safety problems. The U.S. government has a well-established
>> post-authorization/post-approval vaccine safety monitoring
>> infrastructure that will be scaled up to meet the needs of a
>> large-scale COVID-19 vaccination program. The U.S. government €“
>> in partnership with health systems, academic centers, and private
>> sector partners €“ will use multiple existing vaccine safety
>> monitoring systems to monitor COVID-19 vaccines in the
>> post-authorization/approval period. Some of these systems are the
>> Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety
>> Datalink (VSD), the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST)
>> Initiative, and Medicare claims data.
>
> See a shrink. Say others have detected catastrophising and paranoid
> thinking.
>
> 350 million people who have taken the vaccine are wrong but you and
> a tiny group of deluded thinkers know the real truth? Yeah, right.
>
> If you don't want the vaccine, don't take it. It's your loss but no
> one really cares.
>


I never said I didn't want the vaccine. You are confused.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:18:37 -0400, Boron Elgar
> wrote:

>Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon. You're a
>dumb duck.
>>
>>They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
>>been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.
>
>They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word for
>fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>
>https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...ines-explained
>>
>>Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>
>Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.

"If you disagree with me, you must be stupid." That doesn't sound very
smart.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:12:56 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
>> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
>> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
>> again.
>
>I got my shot today. I forgot to check out the RN's tits but my guess is that they were on the small side. That's okay with me. In an emergency situation, big tits might just get in the way. The shots were administered in an immigration processing facility. I took a picture on the outside. I can't say what that thing in the sky was. Looks like a drone.
>
>https://photos.app.goo.gl/oxhkzkcWCChncNBK9

<Leo>
I don't see a thing in the sky, but if you did, it must be a drone
from the Marxist government, checking on the distribution of thought
control medication.
</Leo>

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 3/14/2021 11:28 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:18:37 -0400, Boron Elgar
> > wrote:
>
>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon. You're a
>> dumb duck.
>>>
>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
>>> been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.
>>
>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word for
>> fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>
>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...ines-explained
>>>
>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>
>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.
>
> "If you disagree with me, you must be stupid." That doesn't sound very
> smart.
>


I wonder if this is a side effect. Oh heavens!!!

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:35:53 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 3/14/2021 11:28 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:18:37 -0400, Boron Elgar
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon. You're a
>>> dumb duck.
>>>>
>>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
>>>> been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.
>>>
>>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word for
>>> fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>>
>>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...ines-explained
>>>>
>>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>>
>>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.
>>
>> "If you disagree with me, you must be stupid." That doesn't sound very
>> smart.
>>
>I wonder if this is a side effect. Oh heavens!!!

I'm afraid this is a pre-existing condition.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On 3/14/2021 11:52 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:35:53 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> > wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2021 11:28 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:18:37 -0400, Boron Elgar
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon. You're a
>>>> dumb duck.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They have
>>>>> been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still underway.
>>>>
>>>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word for
>>>> fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-b...ines-explained
>>>>>
>>>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.
>>>
>>> "If you disagree with me, you must be stupid." That doesn't sound very
>>> smart.
>>>
>> I wonder if this is a side effect. Oh heavens!!!
>
> I'm afraid this is a pre-existing condition.
>


Well, that's a relief!

On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 8:31:08 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:12:56 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> > wrote:
>
> >On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
> >> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
> >> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
> >> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
> >> again.
> >
> >I got my shot today. I forgot to check out the RN's tits but my guess is that they were on the small side. That's okay with me. In an emergency situation, big tits might just get in the way. The shots were administered in an immigration processing facility. I took a picture on the outside. I can't say what that thing in the sky was. Looks like a drone.
> >
> >https://photos.app.goo.gl/oxhkzkcWCChncNBK9
>
> <Leo>
> I don't see a thing in the sky, but if you did, it must be a drone
> from the Marxist government, checking on the distribution of thought
> control medication.
> </Leo>
> --
> The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

I don't know what that is. What I do know is that if it is a government surveillance drone then the following must be true:
1) Covid-19 is a lie.
2) The vaccine is a scam to implant millions of American with tracking devices.
3) Trump was not a commie-ruskie asset.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:33:45 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
> wrote:

>On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 8:31:08 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 04:12:56 -0700 (PDT), dsi1
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 11:51:14 AM UTC-10, Sheldon wrote:
>> >> Got my shot today, the nurse did such a good job that I felt nothing,
>> >> or I didn't notice, I was too occupied checking out her massive
>> >> bosoms. I get to return for a 2nd shot in two weeks, hoping I get her
>> >> again.
>> >
>> >I got my shot today. I forgot to check out the RN's tits but my guess is that they were on the small side. That's okay with me. In an emergency situation, big tits might just get in the way. The shots were administered in an immigration processing facility. I took a picture on the outside. I can't say what that thing in the sky was. Looks like a drone.
>> >
>> >https://photos.app.goo.gl/oxhkzkcWCChncNBK9
>>
>> <Leo>
>> I don't see a thing in the sky, but if you did, it must be a drone
>> from the Marxist government, checking on the distribution of thought
>> control medication.
>> </Leo>
>> --
>> The real Bruce posts with Eternal September
>
>I don't know what that is. What I do know is that if it is a government surveillance drone then the following must be true:
>1) Covid-19 is a lie.
>2) The vaccine is a scam to implant millions of American with tracking devices.
>3) Trump was not a commie-ruskie asset.

Yes. Just Watch FOX News.

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 05:31:03 +1100, Bruce > wrote:



>I don't see a thing in the sky, but if you did, it must be a drone
>from the Marxist government, checking on the distribution of thought
>control medication.

Oh well, you're quite safe then. The only thoughts you have involve
sniffing butts.


John Kuthe, Superior to you...

On 3/14/2021 4:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:

>
> I don't know what that is. What I do know is that if it is a government surveillance drone then the following must be true:
> 1) Covid-19 is a lie.
> 2) The vaccine is a scam to implant millions of American with tracking devices.
> 3) Trump was not a commie-ruskie asset.
>

Bill Gates is behind the implanted microchips. I was implanted with the
vaccine last Monday. Ever since, when I use the computer if I open up
Google Chrome instead of Edge, my arm that got the shot give me a shock.
If I use Open Office instead of Excel, my arms starts to pulsate.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 11:01:50 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 3/14/2021 10:07 AM, Pamela wrote:
>> On 15:30 14 Mar 2021, Taxed and Spent said:
>>
>>> On 3/14/2021 8:18 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 07:59:09 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 3/14/2021 7:48 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 05:33:30 -0700, Taxed and Spent
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You are missing the point - two points, actually.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. These are EXPERIMENTAL vaccines, because to be fully
>>>>>>> approved the
>>> y
>>>>>>> need YEARS of study.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nope. You do realize that there are several types of Covid
>>>>>> vaccines out there right now, yeah?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bad things sometime happen after a lot of time has elapsed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah and every single pharmaceutical and OTC drug is required
>>>>>> to report adverse reactions to the FDA. This isn't just for new
>>>>>> drugs, either.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The more people who are taking a med, the more likely an
>>>>>> adverse reaction, if inherent or wildly incidental, will show
>>>>>> up. This is jus
>>> t
>>>>>> numbers, not woo-woo-new-med sort of thing.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did a study for a common brand of NSAID that had been on the
>>>>>> market
>>>
>>>>>> for decades, and if any of the participants said they'd had so
>>>>>> much a
>>> s
>>>>>> an uncomfortable hiccup they felt happened while taking it, my
>>>>>> compan
>>> y
>>>>>> had to file that with the FDA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No system is foolproof, and millions of user and doses can show
>>>>>> up anomalies that smaller, trial numbers might not reveal, but
>>>>>> trying t
>>> o
>>>>>> scare folks off because these vaccines are "new" is pretty
>>>>>> lame.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. Being aware and cautious regarding EXPERIMENTAL vaccines
>>>>>>> does not
>>>
>>>>>>> make one an anti-vaxxer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These are not "experimental", there should be no fear of them
>>>>>> because
>>>
>>>>>> of such an false implications like yours, and so, yeah, you're
>>>>>> an anti-vaxxer for taking that stance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That said, I make no personal comment about anything regarding
>>>>>>> these
>>>
>>>>>>> vaccines or whether one should or should not take them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Um...yeah, you did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Um, no I didn't.
>>>>
>>>> Yup...if it quacks and walks like a duck, it's a duck, hon.
>>>> You're a dumb duck.
>>>>>
>>>>> They are experimental in that they have not been licensed. They
>>>>> have been given Emergency Use Authorization. Studies are still
>>>>> underway.
>>>>
>>>> They are not experimental. You can try to make use of that word
>>>> for fun, but that does not make it applicable in this situation.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/
>>>> emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
>>>>>
>>>>> Take the shot. I am not saying not to.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any
>>>> longer.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What are the plans for continued monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines
>>> authorized by FDA for emergency use?
>>>
>>> FDA expects vaccine manufacturers to include in their EUA requests
>>> a plan for active follow-up for safety, including deaths,
>>> hospitalizations, and other serious or clinically significant
>>> adverse events, among individuals who receive the vaccine under an
>>> EUA, to inform ongoing benefit-risk determinations to support
>>> continuation of the EUA.
>>>
>>> FDA also expects manufacturers who receive an EUA to continue
>>> their clinical trials to obtain additional safety and
>>> effectiveness information and pursue licensure (approval).
>>>
>>> Post-authorization vaccine safety monitoring is a federal
>>> government responsibility shared primarily by FDA and the U.S.
>>> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), along with other
>>> agencies involved in healthcare delivery. Post-authorization
>>> safety monitoring during the COVID-19 pandemic vaccination program
>>> will aim to continuously monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines
>>> to rapidly detect safety problems if they exist. There will be
>>> multiple, complementary systems in place with validated analytic
>>> methods that can rapidly detect signals for possible vaccine
>>> safety problems. The U.S. government has a well-established
>>> post-authorization/post-approval vaccine safety monitoring
>>> infrastructure that will be scaled up to meet the needs of a
>>> large-scale COVID-19 vaccination program. The U.S. government –
>>> in partnership with health systems, academic centers, and private
>>> sector partners – will use multiple existing vaccine safety
>>> monitoring systems to monitor COVID-19 vaccines in the
>>> post-authorization/approval period. Some of these systems are the
>>> Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), the Vaccine Safety
>>> Datalink (VSD), the Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST)
>>> Initiative, and Medicare claims data.
>>
>> See a shrink. Say others have detected catastrophising and paranoid
>> thinking.
>>
>> 350 million people who have taken the vaccine are wrong but you and
>> a tiny group of deluded thinkers know the real truth? Yeah, right.
>>
>> If you don't want the vaccine, don't take it. It's your loss but no
>> one really cares.
>>
>
>
>I never said I didn't want the vaccine. You are confused.

When is she ever not confused? This alleged woman seems to have a
whacko perspective on just about everything.


--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:06:33 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 3/14/2021 4:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't know what that is. What I do know is that if it is a government surveillance drone then the following must be true:
>> 1) Covid-19 is a lie.
>> 2) The vaccine is a scam to implant millions of American with tracking devices.
>> 3) Trump was not a commie-ruskie asset.
>>
>
>Bill Gates is behind the implanted microchips. I was implanted with the
>vaccine last Monday. Ever since, when I use the computer if I open up
>Google Chrome instead of Edge, my arm that got the shot give me a shock.
> If I use Open Office instead of Excel, my arms starts to pulsate.

Do you also keep hearing a voice with a German accent telling you it's
time to start the class struggle?

--
The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 08:30:16 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:

>On 3/14/2021 8:18 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:

>>
>> Sorry, you are not intelligent enough to carry this on any longer.
>>
>
>
>What are the plans for continued monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines
>authorized by FDA for emergency use?

And what is your point in C&P from the FDA? I told you the FDA
monitors this stuff.
>

On Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 12:06:46 PM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 3/14/2021 4:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't know what that is. What I do know is that if it is a government surveillance drone then the following must be true:
> > 1) Covid-19 is a lie.
> > 2) The vaccine is a scam to implant millions of American with tracking devices.
> > 3) Trump was not a commie-ruskie asset.
> >
> Bill Gates is behind the implanted microchips. I was implanted with the
> vaccine last Monday. Ever since, when I use the computer if I open up
> Google Chrome instead of Edge, my arm that got the shot give me a shock.
> If I use Open Office instead of Excel, my arms starts to pulsate.

I've got an old Dell Windows computer that I try to use to program hearing aids but it wouldn't load in the latest programming software. That's okay - I loath that thing. It's so heavy and slow so I borrowed my son's new Windows machine. I was able to load in the software but that thing is so heavy too. The battery will only last an hour or so.
The hearing aid manufacturers should be using web based programming software that connects to the aids through a Bluetooth connection. All the software that needs constant updates and wires and interface boxes has got to go! In the future, that will happen. People will program their own devices and hearing aids will cost less than $200/a pair.
I tried to load in the Chrome browser in the Microsoft Store but it was nowhere to be seen. Microsoft is playing hardball in the browser wars. The guys that shut out the alternate browsers in the early days are getting shut out. Payback is a bitch, alright.

On Sun, 14 Mar 2021 18:06:33 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 3/14/2021 4:33 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't know what that is. What I do know is that if it is a government surveillance drone then the following must be true:
>> 1) Covid-19 is a lie.
>> 2) The vaccine is a scam to implant millions of American with tracking devices.
>> 3) Trump was not a commie-ruskie asset.
>>
>
>Bill Gates is behind the implanted microchips. I was implanted with the
>vaccine last Monday. Ever since, when I use the computer if I open up
>Google Chrome instead of Edge, my arm that got the shot give me a shock.
> If I use Open Office instead of Excel, my arms starts to pulsate.

I'm supposed to get my shot next Friday but I use anything not windows
from choice, maybe I should cancel? Also would the Gates chip annoy
my cat who has a chip from the Toronto rescue centre?