![]() |
Help needed with shaping bagels
<circe @nospam.internet.look.ca> wrote in message
... : Made bagels for the first time today and they came out of the oven : looking more like doughnut-store honey crullers than bagels. : : I had a lot of problems getting the dough to stick to itself when : kneading them, and joining the ends when making a long rope of dough. : In fact one came out of the oven looking more like a croissant than a : bagel! : : What did I do wrong? How can I avoid this in future? : : And one more question - next time I make them, I'd like to double the : recipe and freeze half. This recipe called for one envelope of yeast : and three cups of flour. Is it necessary to use two envelopes of yeast : to six cups of flour or can I get away with just one envelope? : : Circe ============= Making "ropes" is part of the problem. You may find it easier to shape pieces into balls, then flatten and then poke a hole in the middle. That's how I do mine and they're usually pretty normal looking bagels. I would stick to the 1:3 ratio. If you want to double it - then double it (2:6) and just freeze them. Bagels freeze very nicely. -- Cyndi <Remove a "b" to reply> |
Help needed with shaping bagels
Which recipe did you use? Care to post it?
Thanks. circe, @nospam.internet.look.ca wrote: > > Made bagels for the first time today and they came out of the oven > looking more like doughnut-store honey crullers than bagels. > > I had a lot of problems getting the dough to stick to itself when > kneading them, and joining the ends when making a long rope of dough. > In fact one came out of the oven looking more like a croissant than a > bagel! > > What did I do wrong? How can I avoid this in future? > > And one more question - next time I make them, I'd like to double the > recipe and freeze half. This recipe called for one envelope of yeast > and three cups of flour. Is it necessary to use two envelopes of yeast > to six cups of flour or can I get away with just one envelope? > > Circe |
Help needed with shaping bagels
"Phil(NM)" > wrote in message >...
> Which recipe did you use? Care to post it? > Thanks. > > circe, @nospam.internet.look.ca wrote: > > > > Made bagels for the first time today and they came out of the oven > > looking more like doughnut-store honey crullers than bagels. > > > > I had a lot of problems getting the dough to stick to itself when > > kneading them, and joining the ends when making a long rope of dough. > > In fact one came out of the oven looking more like a croissant than a > > bagel! > > > > What did I do wrong? How can I avoid this in future? > > > > And one more question - next time I make them, I'd like to double the > > recipe and freeze half. This recipe called for one envelope of yeast > > and three cups of flour. Is it necessary to use two envelopes of yeast > > to six cups of flour or can I get away with just one envelope? > > > > Circe I think you need lots of yeast because the bagels still have to rise AFTER you boil them. Also, I am *NOT a great baker BUT when I make bagels, I roll the dough into a ball in my hands (like when you shape buns) and poke ny finger through it to make the middle hole. Lynn from Fargo *(Baking requires measuring . . .) |
Help needed with shaping bagels
il Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:05:52 -0500, circe @nospam.internet.look.ca ha
scritto: > I used the recipe at: > http://www.tastingmenu.com/recipes/favorites/bagels.htm but used > ordinary water and brown sugar instead of malt syrup. I don't care for > bagels - just a good excuse for stale bread - so these were for my > husband who is not a bagel purist. I was upset at all the trans fats > in store-bought bagels and having the time, decided to experiment with > making my own. If I can ever get the forming down pat, I'll use the > proper ingredients. > > When I couldn't get the ends of the ropes to stick together - that's > what made the one croissant-shaped bagel, I did poke a hole in the > centre instead but the dough was too dry to stick to itself and they > still turned out lumpy. In fact one bagel I made with the poke the > hole in the middle method still had ridges around the top outside edge > from when I'd cut it off the dough ball. Looked as if I'd rolled a > long cylinder about 4" in diameter then just sliced off each bagel > individually. > > Must say though that they were delicious - million times better than > store-bought ones and weren't as much work to make as I'd thought. I'd > like to make them again if I could only improve their appearance. > > Circe I've tried to make bagels and the recipe talks about making a hole with a floured finger in the balls of dough. Then they rise nicely and look ok. It's the boiling water that turns mine to mishapen things. How does one avoid that? -- Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
il Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:05:52 -0500, circe @nospam.internet.look.ca ha
scritto: [snip] > When I couldn't get the ends of the ropes to stick together - that's > what made the one croissant-shaped bagel, I did poke a hole in the > centre instead but the dough was too dry to stick to itself and they > still turned out lumpy. In fact one bagel I made with the poke the > hole in the middle method still had ridges around the top outside edge > from when I'd cut it off the dough ball. Looked as if I'd rolled a > long cylinder about 4" in diameter then just sliced off each bagel > individually. [snip] My recipe says to roll them into balls, then poke a hole in them. They're not meant to be slices of dough. Then rest and rise, then boil, then bake. Then eat :-)) -- Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
|
Help needed with shaping bagels
il Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:32:59 -0700, "Phil(NM)" ha scritto:
> On one of Julia Childs show, she had a baker there who nmade breads and > bagels... when they poked the center hole, they really stretched it .. > because it contracts when boiling/baking, the initial hole was the size > of the finished bagel .... then they boiled it, and it puffed up some. > They then placed them on parchment on a cookie sheet, let them rest > awhile and finally baked them. And they did double on being baked.... > The secret is not boiling them, but simmering them, I guess. eare ] Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. Maybe 7 mins is too long. -- Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
On 18 Feb 2004 08:54:50 +1300, "Loki" > wrote:
>il Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:32:59 -0700, "Phil(NM)" ha scritto: > >> On one of Julia Childs show, she had a baker there who nmade breads and >> bagels... when they poked the center hole, they really stretched it .. >> because it contracts when boiling/baking, the initial hole was the size >> of the finished bagel .... then they boiled it, and it puffed up some. >> They then placed them on parchment on a cookie sheet, let them rest >> awhile and finally baked them. And they did double on being baked.... >> The secret is not boiling them, but simmering them, I guess. >eare ] > >Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon >as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. >Maybe 7 mins is too long. You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the water. Boron |
Help needed with shaping bagels
il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:35:02 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto:
> >Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon > >as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. > >Maybe 7 mins is too long. > > > You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best > for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you > can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the > water. > > Boron You like to what? diastatic salt, what on earth is this one? I swear they invent new products just to make life difficult. -- Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:35:02 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto:
> > You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best > for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you > can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the > water. > > Boron oops, malt. What is it anyway still. ;-) -- Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
On 18 Feb 2004 14:58:24 +1300, "Loki" > wrote:
>il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:35:02 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto: > >> >Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon >> >as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. >> >Maybe 7 mins is too long. >> >> >> You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best >> for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you >> can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the >> water. >> >> Boron > >You like to what? diastatic salt, what on earth is this one? I swear >they invent new products just to make life difficult. Well this ought to confuse you even more, then...I meant NON-diastatic malt. It gives a shinier & browner crust. My mind was in its usual sourdough niche...diastatic malt is added to break down starch in dough so the yeasts can feed on the sugar. Used 2 different ways. ND is pretty much a sweetener. boron |
Help needed with shaping bagels
il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:14:01 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto:
> On 18 Feb 2004 14:58:24 +1300, "Loki" > wrote: > > >il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:35:02 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto: > > > >> >Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon > >> >as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. > >> >Maybe 7 mins is too long. > >> > >> > >> You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best > >> for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you > >> can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the > >> water. > >> > >> Boron > > > >You like to what? diastatic salt, what on earth is this one? I swear > >they invent new products just to make life difficult. > > > Well this ought to confuse you even more, then...I meant NON-diastatic > malt. It gives a shinier & browner crust. > > My mind was in its usual sourdough niche...diastatic malt is added to > break down starch in dough so the yeasts can feed on the sugar. > > Used 2 different ways. ND is pretty much a sweetener. > > boron So sugar should work ok too? I'll try that 45 secs for simmering too (if I can get the darn stove to simmer) I'm not addicted to achieving a brown crust, fairly laissez faire - if it tastes good that's what counts :-)) BTW. My sister informs me that italian sour dough is not as sour as american sourdough. (Iknow i know - use rec.food.sourdough :-)) -- Cheers, Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
On 19 Feb 2004 09:12:45 +1300, "Loki" > wrote:
>il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:14:01 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto: > >> On 18 Feb 2004 14:58:24 +1300, "Loki" > wrote: >> >> >il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:35:02 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto: >> > >> >> >Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon >> >> >as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. >> >> >Maybe 7 mins is too long. >> >> >> >> >> >> You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best >> >> for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you >> >> can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the >> >> water. >> >> >> >> Boron >> > >> >You like to what? diastatic salt, what on earth is this one? I swear >> >they invent new products just to make life difficult. >> >> >> Well this ought to confuse you even more, then...I meant NON-diastatic >> malt. It gives a shinier & browner crust. >> >> My mind was in its usual sourdough niche...diastatic malt is added to >> break down starch in dough so the yeasts can feed on the sugar. >> >> Used 2 different ways. ND is pretty much a sweetener. >> >> boron > >So sugar should work ok too? I'll try that 45 secs for simmering too >(if I can get the darn stove to simmer) I'm not addicted to achieving >a brown crust, fairly laissez faire - if it tastes good that's what >counts :-)) The NDM give a bit of flavor, too, and I have never seen sugar used as a substitute. Have fun experimenting. >BTW. My sister informs me that italian sour dough is not as sour as >american sourdough. (Iknow i know - use rec.food.sourdough :-)) I have had a lot of Italian breads made with pre-ferment, poolish. biga, etc, but none that I really think of as regular sourdough. Do check RFS, though, as that is where the experts reside. They publish a faq each week. You can google for it. boron |
Help needed with shaping bagels
if there's a Bruggers Bagels near you, go early some morning and watch
as they boil/simmer theirs. The vat is usually behind a special window just so you can watch.. I think they boil for 2 or 3 minutes... Loki wrote: > > il Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:35:02 -0500, Boron Elgar ha scritto: > > > >Heh, mine just go wrinkly when boiled or simmered I'd thought. Soon > > >as they hit that water. I'll have to try again and observe closely. > > >Maybe 7 mins is too long. > > > > > > You are correct, that is too long. About 45 seconds a side works best > > for me and do not use boiling water. Drop it to the lowest simmer you > > can get before you begin. I also like to put diastatic malt into the > > water. > > > > Boron > > You like to what? diastatic salt, what on earth is this one? I swear > they invent new products just to make life difficult. > -- > Cheers, > Loki [ Brevity is the soul of wit. W.Shakespeare ] |
Help needed with shaping bagels
Lynn Gifford wrote: > "Phil(NM)" > wrote in message >... > >>Which recipe did you use? Care to post it? >>Thanks. >> >>circe, @nospam.internet.look.ca wrote: >> >>>Made bagels for the first time today and they came out of the oven >>>looking more like doughnut-store honey crullers than bagels. >>> >>>I had a lot of problems getting the dough to stick to itself when >>>kneading them, and joining the ends when making a long rope of dough. >>>In fact one came out of the oven looking more like a croissant than a >>>bagel! >>> >>>What did I do wrong? How can I avoid this in future? >>> >>>And one more question - next time I make them, I'd like to double the >>>recipe and freeze half. This recipe called for one envelope of yeast >>>and three cups of flour. Is it necessary to use two envelopes of yeast >>>to six cups of flour or can I get away with just one envelope? >>> >>>Circe > > I think you need lots of yeast because the bagels still have to rise > AFTER you boil them. Also, I am *NOT a great baker BUT when I make > bagels, I roll the dough into a ball in my hands (like when you shape > buns) and poke ny finger through it to make the middle hole. > Lynn from Fargo > *(Baking requires measuring . . .) Not sure what you consider "lots" of yeast. In my case, I use one tsp rapid for the sponge and 1/2 tsp for the dough. Seems plenty to me. -- Alan "If you reject the food, ignore the customs, fear the religion, and avoid the people, you might better stay home." --James Michener |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter