General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Salt in recipes?

I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.

Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
is it a taste issue?

Andy
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
zxcvbob
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andy wrote:

> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
> is it a taste issue?
>
> Andy



It depends on the recipe. If you are making pickles or sauerkraut or
sausage, the salt is critical. For most everything else, the salt is
optional or "to taste."

I usually put half the salt called for in cookies/cakes/soups/casseroles
etc. If I don't add any salt they don't taste right, and no amount of
salt added at the table fixes it. It's the same if you leave out the
salt when boiling pasta -- it never tastes right. So I shoot for
undersalting a little and then have a salt shaker on the table.

Bob
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
zxcvbob
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andy wrote:

> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
> is it a taste issue?
>
> Andy



It depends on the recipe. If you are making pickles or sauerkraut or
sausage, the salt is critical. For most everything else, the salt is
optional or "to taste."

I usually put half the salt called for in cookies/cakes/soups/casseroles
etc. If I don't add any salt they don't taste right, and no amount of
salt added at the table fixes it. It's the same if you leave out the
salt when boiling pasta -- it never tastes right. So I shoot for
undersalting a little and then have a salt shaker on the table.

Bob
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

zxcvbob > wrote in news:321bd8F3gugc5U1
@individual.net:

> Andy wrote:
>
>> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>
>> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it

or
>> is it a taste issue?
>>
>> Andy

>
>
> It depends on the recipe. If you are making pickles or sauerkraut

or
> sausage, the salt is critical. For most everything else, the salt

is
> optional or "to taste."
>
> I usually put half the salt called for in

cookies/cakes/soups/casseroles
> etc. If I don't add any salt they don't taste right, and no amount

of
> salt added at the table fixes it. It's the same if you leave out

the
> salt when boiling pasta -- it never tastes right. So I shoot for
> undersalting a little and then have a salt shaker on the table.
>
> Bob



High blood pressure is why I cut back on using salt as much as
possible.

Now that I'm learning to cook, it's just a matter of taste. Probably
trial and error for recipes I love.

Andy
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andy
 
Posts: n/a
Default

zxcvbob > wrote in news:321bd8F3gugc5U1
@individual.net:

> Andy wrote:
>
>> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>
>> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it

or
>> is it a taste issue?
>>
>> Andy

>
>
> It depends on the recipe. If you are making pickles or sauerkraut

or
> sausage, the salt is critical. For most everything else, the salt

is
> optional or "to taste."
>
> I usually put half the salt called for in

cookies/cakes/soups/casseroles
> etc. If I don't add any salt they don't taste right, and no amount

of
> salt added at the table fixes it. It's the same if you leave out

the
> salt when boiling pasta -- it never tastes right. So I shoot for
> undersalting a little and then have a salt shaker on the table.
>
> Bob



High blood pressure is why I cut back on using salt as much as
possible.

Now that I'm learning to cook, it's just a matter of taste. Probably
trial and error for recipes I love.

Andy


  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you're baking, salt is usually necessary on many levels. It brings
out the flavor of the butter or sugar or lemon or vanilla. And in
bread baking, it checks the growth of your yeast. Nothing more ghastly
than bread with no salt! Unless of course you must go without due to
health issues. If you're expecting others to eat your food, make two
batches. Saltless food just plain sucks. ;-)

  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If you're baking, salt is usually necessary on many levels. It brings
out the flavor of the butter or sugar or lemon or vanilla. And in
bread baking, it checks the growth of your yeast. Nothing more ghastly
than bread with no salt! Unless of course you must go without due to
health issues. If you're expecting others to eat your food, make two
batches. Saltless food just plain sucks. ;-)

  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:49:54 -0600, Andy >
scribbled some thoughts:


>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>is it a taste issue?
>
>Andy



For starters, Sodium (Na) and Salt (table variety: NaCl) are
two different things, contrary to what marketing/health
professionals would have you believe. Funny, two flammable
gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water
(H2O) with Oxygen being required to live. So to with NaCl,
it is individually poisonous to us mere humans, but combined
we cannot live without it contrary to what the
health/marketing professionals would have you believe.
Also, sugar is brain food.

I digress, Salt is required in some dishes (bread to control
the leavening of yeast) and to impart taste, cheese making.

If salt has lost it's savor, what good is it?

Salary comes from Salarium from Salarius which is Latin for
Salt. Roman soldiers used to be paid in salt, it was that
valuable. Salt is a preservative and a seasoning.

I dare say people's problems from salt comes from salting
everything they eat. I generally use it at the table for
steaks, fries, & grilled cheese sandwhiches.

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 11 Dec 2004 15:49:54 -0600, Andy >
scribbled some thoughts:


>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>is it a taste issue?
>
>Andy



For starters, Sodium (Na) and Salt (table variety: NaCl) are
two different things, contrary to what marketing/health
professionals would have you believe. Funny, two flammable
gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water
(H2O) with Oxygen being required to live. So to with NaCl,
it is individually poisonous to us mere humans, but combined
we cannot live without it contrary to what the
health/marketing professionals would have you believe.
Also, sugar is brain food.

I digress, Salt is required in some dishes (bread to control
the leavening of yeast) and to impart taste, cheese making.

If salt has lost it's savor, what good is it?

Salary comes from Salarium from Salarius which is Latin for
Salt. Roman soldiers used to be paid in salt, it was that
valuable. Salt is a preservative and a seasoning.

I dare say people's problems from salt comes from salting
everything they eat. I generally use it at the table for
steaks, fries, & grilled cheese sandwhiches.

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\
  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
PENMART01
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew H. Carter spurts:
>
>Andy scribbled:
>
>
>>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>
>>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>>is it a taste issue?
>>
>>Andy

>
>Funny, two flammable
>gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water


Oxygen is not flammable.

Idiot... GED drop out.


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
PENMART01
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Andrew H. Carter spurts:
>
>Andy scribbled:
>
>
>>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>
>>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>>is it a taste issue?
>>
>>Andy

>
>Funny, two flammable
>gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water


Oxygen is not flammable.

Idiot... GED drop out.


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````
  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Up to the person cooking to leave out the salt. I think recipes are
guidelines anyway. But I once had a sandwich at a "healthy" restaurant
on Cape Cod and it was inedible (to me anyway) because it was served on
unsalted bread. My Aunt made an Easter Bread with no salt, and it
tasted like garbage even made into French toast. We ended up salting
the French Toast.

  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Up to the person cooking to leave out the salt. I think recipes are
guidelines anyway. But I once had a sandwich at a "healthy" restaurant
on Cape Cod and it was inedible (to me anyway) because it was served on
unsalted bread. My Aunt made an Easter Bread with no salt, and it
tasted like garbage even made into French toast. We ended up salting
the French Toast.



  #16 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 12 Dec 2004 02:39:04 GMT, (PENMART01)
scribbled some thoughts:


>Andrew H. Carter spurts:
>>
>>Andy scribbled:
>>
>>
>>>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>>
>>>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>>>is it a taste issue?
>>>
>>>Andy

>>
>>Funny, two flammable
>>gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water

>
>Oxygen is not flammable.
>
>Idiot... GED drop out.


True, I didn't get a GED, I graduated.

ox•y•gen \"ak-si-jen\ noun often attrib [F oxygene, fr. Gk
oxys, adj., acidic, lit., sharp + F -gene -gen; akin to L
acer sharp — more at edge] (1790)
: a colorless tasteless odorless gaseous element that
constitutes 21 percent of the atmosphere and is found in
water, in most rocks and minerals, and in numerous organic
compounds, that is capable of combining with all elements
except the inert gases, that is active in physiological
processes, and that is involved esp. in combustion — see
element table
ox•y•gen•ic \'ak-si-"je-nik\ adjective
ox•y•gen•less \"ak-si-jen-les\ adjective

flam•ma•ble \"fla-me-bel\ adjective [L flammare to flame,
set on fire, fr. flamma] (1813)
: capable of being easily ignited and of burning quickly
flammable noun

(C)1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster,
Incorporated. All rights reserved.

Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
then striking a match then come back if possible and report
your findings.

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\
  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 12 Dec 2004 02:39:04 GMT, (PENMART01)
scribbled some thoughts:


>Andrew H. Carter spurts:
>>
>>Andy scribbled:
>>
>>
>>>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>>
>>>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>>>is it a taste issue?
>>>
>>>Andy

>>
>>Funny, two flammable
>>gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water

>
>Oxygen is not flammable.
>
>Idiot... GED drop out.


True, I didn't get a GED, I graduated.

ox•y•gen \"ak-si-jen\ noun often attrib [F oxygene, fr. Gk
oxys, adj., acidic, lit., sharp + F -gene -gen; akin to L
acer sharp — more at edge] (1790)
: a colorless tasteless odorless gaseous element that
constitutes 21 percent of the atmosphere and is found in
water, in most rocks and minerals, and in numerous organic
compounds, that is capable of combining with all elements
except the inert gases, that is active in physiological
processes, and that is involved esp. in combustion — see
element table
ox•y•gen•ic \'ak-si-"je-nik\ adjective
ox•y•gen•less \"ak-si-jen-les\ adjective

flam•ma•ble \"fla-me-bel\ adjective [L flammare to flame,
set on fire, fr. flamma] (1813)
: capable of being easily ignited and of burning quickly
flammable noun

(C)1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster,
Incorporated. All rights reserved.

Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
then striking a match then come back if possible and report
your findings.

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\
  #22 (permalink)   Report Post  
PENMART01
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>Andrew H. Carter prevaricates:
>
>(PENMART01) wrotye:
>>Andrew H. Carter spurts:
>>>Andy scribbled:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>>>
>>>>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>>>>is it a taste issue?
>>>
>>>Funny, two flammable
>>>gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water

>>
>>Oxygen is not flammable.
>>
>>Idiot...



>ox€¢y€¢gen \"ak-si-jen\ noun often attrib [F oxygene, fr. Gk
>oxys, adj., acidic, lit., sharp + F -gene -gen; akin to L
>acer sharp €” more at edge] (1790)
>: a colorless tasteless odorless gaseous element that
>constitutes 21 percent of the atmosphere and is found in
>water, in most rocks and minerals, and in numerous organic
>compounds, that is capable of combining with all elements
>except the inert gases, that is active in physiological
>processes, and that is involved esp. in combustion €” see
>element table
>ox€¢y€¢gen€¢ic \'ak-si-"je-nik\ adjective
>ox€¢y€¢gen€¢less \"ak-si-jen-les\ adjective
>===================
>flam€¢ma€¢ble \"fla-me-bel\ adjective [L flammare to flame,
>set on fire, fr. flamma] (1813)
>: capable of being easily ignited and of burning quickly
>flammable noun


You posted two separate entries, you smarmy *******. Oxygen in of itself is
NOT flammable... oxygen *supports* combustion. Don't even think of playing
word games with me, I'll slash your lying tongue to ribbons, you SMARMY, most
ignorant *******.

---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````
  #23 (permalink)   Report Post  
PENMART01
 
Posts: n/a
Default

>Andrew H. Carter prevaricates:
>
>(PENMART01) wrotye:
>>Andrew H. Carter spurts:
>>>Andy scribbled:
>>>
>>>
>>>>I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>>>>
>>>>Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
>>>>is it a taste issue?
>>>
>>>Funny, two flammable
>>>gasses Hydrogen (H) and Oxygen (O) combine to form water

>>
>>Oxygen is not flammable.
>>
>>Idiot...



>ox€¢y€¢gen \"ak-si-jen\ noun often attrib [F oxygene, fr. Gk
>oxys, adj., acidic, lit., sharp + F -gene -gen; akin to L
>acer sharp €” more at edge] (1790)
>: a colorless tasteless odorless gaseous element that
>constitutes 21 percent of the atmosphere and is found in
>water, in most rocks and minerals, and in numerous organic
>compounds, that is capable of combining with all elements
>except the inert gases, that is active in physiological
>processes, and that is involved esp. in combustion €” see
>element table
>ox€¢y€¢gen€¢ic \'ak-si-"je-nik\ adjective
>ox€¢y€¢gen€¢less \"ak-si-jen-les\ adjective
>===================
>flam€¢ma€¢ble \"fla-me-bel\ adjective [L flammare to flame,
>set on fire, fr. flamma] (1813)
>: capable of being easily ignited and of burning quickly
>flammable noun


You posted two separate entries, you smarmy *******. Oxygen in of itself is
NOT flammable... oxygen *supports* combustion. Don't even think of playing
word games with me, I'll slash your lying tongue to ribbons, you SMARMY, most
ignorant *******.

---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````
  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Edwin Pawlowski
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
>
> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
> your findings.


It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.


  #27 (permalink)   Report Post  
Edwin Pawlowski
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
>
> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
> your findings.


It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.


  #28 (permalink)   Report Post  
Edwin Pawlowski
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
>
> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
> your findings.


It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.


  #29 (permalink)   Report Post  
Shawn Hearn
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article >,
Andy > wrote:

> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
> is it a taste issue?


Purely taste in recipes, except for some baked goods. I rarely use salt
in my cooking because I don't like salt that much. No problem.
  #33 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 05:39:55 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
> scribbled some thoughts:


>
>"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
>>
>> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
>> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
>> your findings.

>
>It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
>combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
>handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.
>


I should think the definition needs to be changed.

http://www.bocindustrial.com/safety/..._of_oxygen.asp

Smoking

Many burning accidents which occur are triggered off by the
lighting of a cigarette, therefore it is impossible to
over-emphasise the danger of smoking in oxygen enriched
atmospheres or where oxygen enrichment can occur. In such
areas smoking must be forbidden.


So it's okay to strike up a match in an oxygen rich room?

If you cannot have a fire without oxygen, then what praytell
is oxygen, a fire retardant? Will hydrogen burn in the
absence of oxygen?

The point being that two chemicals which produce flames
under the right conditions can put up fires of a certain
type (non-electrical, non-chemical).

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\
  #34 (permalink)   Report Post  
Arri London
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Andy wrote:
>
> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
> is it a taste issue?
>
> Andy


Other than in preserving/pickling, salt isn't an absolute requirement.
We rarely put salt into sweet baked goods and no one has ever said
anything other than 'More please.' In bread it's really there for the
flavour. Supposedly it retards the yeast, but having made saltless
breads many times, there was never any difference in the bread rise with
or without salt.
  #35 (permalink)   Report Post  
Arri London
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Andy wrote:
>
> I'm a no-salt person, except when it comes to recipes.
>
> Is salt an absolute requirement in those recipes that call for it or
> is it a taste issue?
>
> Andy


Other than in preserving/pickling, salt isn't an absolute requirement.
We rarely put salt into sweet baked goods and no one has ever said
anything other than 'More please.' In bread it's really there for the
flavour. Supposedly it retards the yeast, but having made saltless
breads many times, there was never any difference in the bread rise with
or without salt.


  #36 (permalink)   Report Post  
Arri London
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Andrew H. Carter" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 05:39:55 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
> > scribbled some thoughts:
>
>
> >
> >"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
> >>
> >> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
> >> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
> >> your findings.

> >
> >It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
> >combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
> >handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.
> >

>
> I should think the definition needs to be changed.
>
> http://www.bocindustrial.com/safety/..._of_oxygen.asp
>
> Smoking
>
> Many burning accidents which occur are triggered off by the
> lighting of a cigarette, therefore it is impossible to
> over-emphasise the danger of smoking in oxygen enriched
> atmospheres or where oxygen enrichment can occur. In such
> areas smoking must be forbidden.
>
> So it's okay to strike up a match in an oxygen rich room?


No because oxygen *supports* combustion even though it isn't flammable
itself. That's basic chemistry.
>
> If you cannot have a fire without oxygen, then what praytell
> is oxygen, a fire retardant? Will hydrogen burn in the
> absence of oxygen?


Yes certainly. We did that experiment in high school chemistry; hydrogen
collected from the electrolysis of pure water and ignited by a spark.
>
> The point being that two chemicals which produce flames
> under the right conditions can put up fires of a certain
> type (non-electrical, non-chemical).


Oxygen doesn't produce flames.
  #37 (permalink)   Report Post  
Arri London
 
Posts: n/a
Default



"Andrew H. Carter" wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 05:39:55 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
> > scribbled some thoughts:
>
>
> >
> >"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
> >>
> >> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
> >> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
> >> your findings.

> >
> >It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
> >combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
> >handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.
> >

>
> I should think the definition needs to be changed.
>
> http://www.bocindustrial.com/safety/..._of_oxygen.asp
>
> Smoking
>
> Many burning accidents which occur are triggered off by the
> lighting of a cigarette, therefore it is impossible to
> over-emphasise the danger of smoking in oxygen enriched
> atmospheres or where oxygen enrichment can occur. In such
> areas smoking must be forbidden.
>
> So it's okay to strike up a match in an oxygen rich room?


No because oxygen *supports* combustion even though it isn't flammable
itself. That's basic chemistry.
>
> If you cannot have a fire without oxygen, then what praytell
> is oxygen, a fire retardant? Will hydrogen burn in the
> absence of oxygen?


Yes certainly. We did that experiment in high school chemistry; hydrogen
collected from the electrolysis of pure water and ignited by a spark.
>
> The point being that two chemicals which produce flames
> under the right conditions can put up fires of a certain
> type (non-electrical, non-chemical).


Oxygen doesn't produce flames.
  #38 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:15:39 -0700, Arri London
> scribbled some thoughts:


>
>
>"Andrew H. Carter" wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 05:39:55 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
>> > scribbled some thoughts:
>>
>>
>> >
>> >"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
>> >>
>> >> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
>> >> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
>> >> your findings.
>> >
>> >It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
>> >combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
>> >handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.
>> >

>>
>> I should think the definition needs to be changed.
>>
>> http://www.bocindustrial.com/safety/..._of_oxygen.asp
>>
>> Smoking
>>
>> Many burning accidents which occur are triggered off by the
>> lighting of a cigarette, therefore it is impossible to
>> over-emphasise the danger of smoking in oxygen enriched
>> atmospheres or where oxygen enrichment can occur. In such
>> areas smoking must be forbidden.
>>
>> So it's okay to strike up a match in an oxygen rich room?

>
>No because oxygen *supports* combustion even though it isn't flammable
>itself. That's basic chemistry.
>>
>> If you cannot have a fire without oxygen, then what praytell
>> is oxygen, a fire retardant? Will hydrogen burn in the
>> absence of oxygen?

>
>Yes certainly. We did that experiment in high school chemistry; hydrogen
>collected from the electrolysis of pure water and ignited by a spark.
>>


We did that too!, but it was in a room where oxygen was
present. I'm not talking cold fusion, I'm talking absolute
100% hydrogen combustion in a vacuum at least where there is
no Oxygen present at all, no other gas present except
hydrogen. I bet that did not happen. At the same time in
space where there is no oxygen due to the lack of gravity,
it would be curious to solve that riddle.

While burning hydrogen "produces" water and Oxygen, it
doesn't really, the combustion of such accumulates those
molecules/atoms.

Anyway, back to the point. Sodium and Salt are not the same
things. If such are, then one could say (like the marketers
do when they say: Sodium/Salt needs to be cut back):

"Oxygen/Water needs to be cut back, we consume too much of
it."

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\
  #39 (permalink)   Report Post  
Andrew H. Carter
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 18:15:39 -0700, Arri London
> scribbled some thoughts:


>
>
>"Andrew H. Carter" wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 05:39:55 GMT, "Edwin Pawlowski"
>> > scribbled some thoughts:
>>
>>
>> >
>> >"Andrew H. Carter" > wrote in message
>> >>
>> >> Tell, you what, how about going into a oxygen rich room and
>> >> then striking a match then come back if possible and report
>> >> your findings.
>> >
>> >It is still not considered a flammable gas, but an oxidant. It support
>> >combustion but does not cause it. FWIW, a portion of my income is from
>> >handling oxygen so I took the time to learn a little about it.
>> >

>>
>> I should think the definition needs to be changed.
>>
>> http://www.bocindustrial.com/safety/..._of_oxygen.asp
>>
>> Smoking
>>
>> Many burning accidents which occur are triggered off by the
>> lighting of a cigarette, therefore it is impossible to
>> over-emphasise the danger of smoking in oxygen enriched
>> atmospheres or where oxygen enrichment can occur. In such
>> areas smoking must be forbidden.
>>
>> So it's okay to strike up a match in an oxygen rich room?

>
>No because oxygen *supports* combustion even though it isn't flammable
>itself. That's basic chemistry.
>>
>> If you cannot have a fire without oxygen, then what praytell
>> is oxygen, a fire retardant? Will hydrogen burn in the
>> absence of oxygen?

>
>Yes certainly. We did that experiment in high school chemistry; hydrogen
>collected from the electrolysis of pure water and ignited by a spark.
>>


We did that too!, but it was in a room where oxygen was
present. I'm not talking cold fusion, I'm talking absolute
100% hydrogen combustion in a vacuum at least where there is
no Oxygen present at all, no other gas present except
hydrogen. I bet that did not happen. At the same time in
space where there is no oxygen due to the lack of gravity,
it would be curious to solve that riddle.

While burning hydrogen "produces" water and Oxygen, it
doesn't really, the combustion of such accumulates those
molecules/atoms.

Anyway, back to the point. Sodium and Salt are not the same
things. If such are, then one could say (like the marketers
do when they say: Sodium/Salt needs to be cut back):

"Oxygen/Water needs to be cut back, we consume too much of
it."

--

Sincerely, | NOTE: Best viewed in a fixed pitch font
| (©) (©)
Andrew H. Carter | ------ooo--(_)--ooo------
d(-_-)b | /// \\\
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need suggestion for no salt and extremely low salt recipes [email protected] General Cooking 92 25-05-2011 12:56 AM
Ping: Geoff salt/sugar free recipes The Joneses[_1_] Preserving 0 28-05-2007 10:15 PM
Kosher salt in American recipes? Victor Sack General Cooking 34 19-09-2005 03:38 AM
Scientific explanation for using salt (or pepper) in recipes? Anton Suchaneck General Cooking 31 16-06-2005 04:59 PM
Substitute Nosalt for salt in recipes? Advanced Primate General Cooking 1 23-05-2005 03:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"