Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>> Low refined carb diets are low in carbs overall.
> > Not for those without hyperketonemia. Could you be more specific please? AFAIK, USDA high-carb diet recommendation is 300g carbs/day, which should make up 60% of your energy. Meanwhile, anything above 100g will keep you from ketosis. If 300g/60% is named high, how would you name 100g/20%? Mirek |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Must you cross post this crap into alt.support.diabetes?
We don't want it. Take outside, as the bartender said. Mirek Fídler wrote: >>>Low refined carb diets are low in carbs overall. >> >>Not for those without hyperketonemia. > > > Could you be more specific please? > > AFAIK, USDA high-carb diet recommendation is 300g carbs/day, which should > make up 60% of your energy. > > Meanwhile, anything above 100g will keep you from ketosis. > > If 300g/60% is named high, how would you name 100g/20%? > > Mirek > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mirek Fídler" wrote:
> > >> Low refined carb diets are low in carbs overall. > > > > Not for those without hyperketonemia. > > Could you be more specific please? I have written plainly. > AFAIK, USDA high-carb diet recommendation is 300g carbs/day, which should > make up 60% of your energy. Depends on your activity level and basal metabolic rate. > Meanwhile, anything above 100g will keep you from ketosis. That too depends on many things including your activity level, basal metabolic rate, and protein intake. > If 300g/60% is named high, how would you name 100g/20%? "Low-carb" means that there are not enough carbohydrate being consumed to sustain the Krebs cycle resulting in hyperketonemia. The exact number of grams of carbohydrates will vary from person to person, meal to meal, and time to time. Any time I hear someone saying that they are singling out carbohydrates to be reduced, what they are doing is likely "low-carb" if there is weight-loss especially if there is loss of appetite. When I smell their "ketone breath," I then *know* that they are low-carbing. Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9 |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > píse v diskusním
príspevku news:1102874560.9807320697ef60c4db108f8be3def8fc@t eranews... > I have written plainly. Not enough plainly for me to understand. Forgive me not being able to. >> Meanwhile, anything above 100g will keep you from ketosis. > > That too depends on many things including your activity level, basal > metabolic rate, and protein intake. Protein? AFAIK protein intake is more or less neutral w.r.t. ketosis. > "Low-carb" means that there are not enough carbohydrate being consumed > to sustain the Krebs cycle resulting in hyperketonemia. That is your definition. Standard name for this situation is "ketogenic" (or "very-low-carb", if you insist). > "ketone breath," I then *know* that they are low-carbing. Sure, you know everything, that is well known. Mirek |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mirek Fídler" wrote:
> > "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > píse v diskusním > príspevku news:1102874560.9807320697ef60c4db108f8be3def8fc@t eranews... > > > I have written plainly. > > Not enough plainly for me to understand. Forgive me not being able to. > > >> Meanwhile, anything above 100g will keep you from ketosis. > > > > That too depends on many things including your activity level, basal > > metabolic rate, and protein intake. > > Protein? AFAIK protein intake is more or less neutral w.r.t. ketosis. It is not. > > "Low-carb" means that there are not enough carbohydrate being consumed > > to sustain the Krebs cycle resulting in hyperketonemia. > > That is your definition. Standard name for this situation is "ketogenic" (or > "very-low-carb", if you insist). Asked and answered (shrug). > > "ketone breath," I then *know* that they are low-carbing. > > Sure, you know everything, that is well known. It seems you have me confused with Whom I serve. All the glory belongs to my heavenly Father, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength :-) Servant to the humblest person in the universe, Andrew -- Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD Board-Certified Cardiologist http://www.heartmdphd.com/ ** Who is the humblest person in the universe? http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048 What is all this about? http://makeashorterlink.com/?K6F72510A Is this spam? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D13B21FF9 |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Must you cross post this crap into alt.support.diabetes?
We don't want it. Take outside, as the bartender said. Mirek Fídler wrote: >>>Low refined carb diets are low in carbs overall. >> >>Not for those without hyperketonemia. > > > Could you be more specific please? > > AFAIK, USDA high-carb diet recommendation is 300g carbs/day, which should > make up 60% of your energy. > > Meanwhile, anything above 100g will keep you from ketosis. > > If 300g/60% is named high, how would you name 100g/20%? > > Mirek > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's the name of the Revolution anyway? | Vegan | |||
plz critique this menu | General Cooking | |||
plz critique this menu | General Cooking | |||
Bistrot revolution | General Cooking | |||
Really Better Chocolate. Dietetic Too. | Chocolate |