Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Must you cross post this crap into alt.support.diabetes?
We don't want it. Take outside, as the bartender said. Bob (this one) wrote: > Mirek Fídler wrote: > >>>> But that is not number of responders. >>> >>> >>> The number of responders is a dynamic one. >>> >>>> But I am sure that you will rather >>>> find any way how to answer this question without giving the number >>>> (that is >>>> correct answer). >>> >>> >>> The effectiveness of the 2PD Approach is measured by the percentage of >>> folks who respond. As long as the number of non-responders is 0 (zero), >>> the percentage will remain 100% no matter how large the number of >>> responders grows. As far as I know, there is no other diet or diet >>> approach that can make the claim of being 100% effective for bringing >>> about weight loss. Moreover, 100% of those who have been using the 2PD >>> Approach for more than 5 years are lighter than their *before* weight >>> (i.e. none of these veteran 2PDers are heavier). So yes, the 2PD >>> Approach is now one way to "cure" obesity. >> >> >> Yes, I knew it. No number, just fuzzy talk we are already used to. > > > Part of it is because the 2PD isn't more than 5 years old. Chung claims > there are people who have been doing it for more than that. > > Bob > >> No problem, I did not hold my breath. I know you very well already... ![]() >> >> Mirek > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What's the name of the Revolution anyway? | Vegan | |||
plz critique this menu | General Cooking | |||
plz critique this menu | General Cooking | |||
Bistrot revolution | General Cooking | |||
Really Better Chocolate. Dietetic Too. | Chocolate |