General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Goomba38
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Remanufactured Eggs" Redo

Regarding our recent thread on store practices with eggs and their
cartons (how they handle breakage and repackaging) and how nervous some
people become with eggs:
The March 2004 issue of Consumer Reports states that federally graded
eggs can't have an expiration date over 30 days past being put in the
carton, yet they're still safe to use "for the next 3-5 weeks" past
sale. The article also mentions that product dating is *not* required
except on poultry, infant formula and some baby food.


  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
John Gaughan
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Remanufactured Eggs" Redo

Goomba38 wrote:
> The March 2004 issue of Consumer Reports states that federally graded
> eggs can't have an expiration date over 30 days past being put in
> the carton, yet they're still safe to use "for the next 3-5 weeks"
> past sale.


Does it say anything about pasteurized eggs, or are they lumped together
with regular eggs?

--
John Gaughan
http://www.johngaughan.net/

  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Curly Sue
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Remanufactured Eggs" Redo

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:36:59 -0500, Goomba38 >
wrote:

>--------------2F2079D9C18BCAB679B8C4A0
>Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
><!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
><html>
>Regarding our recent thread on store practices with eggs and their cartons
>(how they handle breakage and repackaging) and how nervous some people
>become with eggs:
><br>The March 2004 issue of<u> Consumer Reports</u> states that federally
>graded eggs can't have an expiration date over 30 days past being put in
>the carton, yet they're still safe to use "for the next 3-5 weeks" past
>sale.&nbsp; The article also mentions that product dating is *not* required
>except on poultry, infant formula and some baby food.
><br>&nbsp;</html>
>
>--------------2F2079D9C18BCAB679B8C4A0--


And br&nbsp; to you too!

The original post said that the eggs were repackaged without regard to
size, shipment/expiration date, or source.

Eggs (and dairy products such as milk, yogurt, cottage cheese, etc.)
and other packaged items (eg. tofu) are perishable and regardless of
how long that period is, I need to know when the clock starts ticking.
As a consumer, I should have the right to know what I'm buying. That
goes for sizing too.

Eggs come in cartons which make the source identifiable. Should I
have any complaints about the eggs, if I want to buy eggs from a
particular source, or in the unlikely case that they need to be
recalled I want to know where the eggs came from, just as I do for
milk and other dairy products.

One might make a case for repackaging, but there is no reason or
justification other than greed for deceiving consumers by repackaging
eggs without telling them. If the stores want to do it, they should
put them in cartons where the repackaging is clearly identified,
perhaps with a sticker. And repackaging should only be done once.

I am surprized that Consumer Reports claims there is no product dating
required for anything other than poultry, infant formula and some baby
food.

My milk says "sell by March 10, in NYC March 09." Maybe if I have
time next week I'll call the Health Department and find out where this
comes from (voluntary or required). My suspicion is that it's
required by local health code, but who knows!

Sue(tm)
Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Levelwave©
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Remanufactured Eggs" Redo

Curly Sue wrote:

> My milk says "sell by March 10, in NYC March 09."



Does NYC have a one day shorter sell-by-date than other cities?

~john

  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
jmcquown
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Remanufactured Eggs" Redo

Curly Sue wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:36:59 -0500, Goomba38 >
> wrote:
>
>> --------------2F2079D9C18BCAB679B8C4A0
>> Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>>
>> <!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
>> <html>
>> Regarding our recent thread on store practices with eggs and their
>> cartons (how they handle breakage and repackaging) and how nervous
>> some people become with eggs:
>> <br>The March 2004 issue of<u> Consumer Reports</u> states that
>> federally graded eggs can't have an expiration date over 30 days
>> past being put in the carton, yet they're still safe to use "for the
>> next 3-5 weeks" past sale.&nbsp; The article also mentions that
>> product dating is *not* required except on poultry, infant formula
>> and some baby food. <br>&nbsp;</html>
>>
>> --------------2F2079D9C18BCAB679B8C4A0--

>
> And br&nbsp; to you too!
>
> The original post said that the eggs were repackaged without regard to
> size, shipment/expiration date, or source.

(snippage)
> As a consumer, I should have the right to know what I'm buying. That
> goes for sizing too.

(snip)
> Sue(tm)
> Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!


Agreed! Let us forget for a moment about the expiration date. I don't want
to buy repackaged eggs which purport to be "X-tra large" because of the
container but in reality are a combination of including medium, large and
small eggs.

Granted, I normally open a carton and jiggle the eggs between thumb and
forefinger to make sure none are broken and stuck to the bottom of the
carton. But I don't want to have to become an egg-inspector to determine if
the eggs are the correct size for the label on the carton.

Jill




  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Curly Sue
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Remanufactured Eggs" Redo

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:30:39 -0500, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Levelwave=A9?=
> wrote:

>Curly Sue wrote:
>
>> My milk says "sell by March 10, in NYC March 09."

>
>
>Does NYC have a one day shorter sell-by-date than other cities?
>
>~john


That's what it looks like, at least for the cities in this market.

With my magnifying glass (getting old sucks :>) I read the additional
notice: "When offered for sale in NJ, not to be sold after the date
indicated. When offered for sale in NY City, may be sold until
midnight of date indicated."

So in NJ, this bottle of milk may be sold until midnight March 10
(after which, of course, it is after the date indicated)..
In NYC, this bottle may be sold until midnight of March 09.

Of course, now that it's opened, I don't think I can sell it :> And
hopefully, grocery stores wouldn't repackage it either!

Sue(tm)
Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
seafoodwatch.org - redo sf[_9_] General Cooking 2 05-08-2009 10:53 PM
Kitchen Redo Janis General Cooking 34 03-09-2008 06:05 PM
REDO: On Again, Off Again pot-roast Michael Horowitz General Cooking 5 29-01-2007 05:25 AM
kitchen redo Sis Cooking Equipment 8 20-12-2004 02:21 AM
Remanufactured Eggs Mark Thorson General Cooking 28 10-02-2004 04:00 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:27 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"