Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and said
you thought it could be made with Splenda. If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble $10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! Thanks. Felice |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and said
you thought it could be made with Splenda. If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble $10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! Thanks. Felice |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:46:07 GMT, "Felice Friese" >
wrote: >At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and said >you thought it could be made with Splenda. > >If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of >making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble >$10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! Virtually any cheesecake can be made with Splenda, because the structural integrity of a cheesecake isn't compromised by the deletion of sugar. Sugar in baked goods serves a function other than just adding sweetness. It doesn't really make that kind of contribution in cheesecake. There are a lot of people from alt.support.diet.low-carb here who can probably explain this better than I can. The easy answer is, go ahead and make it that way. There should be no problem. Carol -- "Years ago my mother used to say to me... She'd say, 'In this world Elwood, you must be oh-so smart or oh-so pleasant.' Well, for years I was smart.... I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." *James Stewart* in the 1950 movie, _Harvey_ |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote in message ... > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:46:07 GMT, "Felice Friese" > > wrote: > >>At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and >>said >>you thought it could be made with Splenda. >> >>If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought >>of >>making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble >>$10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! > > Virtually any cheesecake can be made with Splenda, because the structural > integrity of a cheesecake isn't compromised by the deletion of sugar. > Sugar in baked goods serves a function other than just adding sweetness. > It doesn't really make that kind of contribution in cheesecake. > > There are a lot of people from alt.support.diet.low-carb here who can > probably explain this better than I can. The easy answer is, go ahead and > make it that way. There should be no problem. > > Carol Ah! Thanks, Carol. Now I'm encouraged to go ahead and whip one up for a dear neighbor who is really conscientious about his low-carb diet. He'd be much happier than if I said "But there are 'only' two tablespoons of sugar in that wee slice!" Felice |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Damsel in dis Dress" > wrote in message ... > On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:46:07 GMT, "Felice Friese" > > wrote: > >>At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and >>said >>you thought it could be made with Splenda. >> >>If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought >>of >>making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble >>$10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! > > Virtually any cheesecake can be made with Splenda, because the structural > integrity of a cheesecake isn't compromised by the deletion of sugar. > Sugar in baked goods serves a function other than just adding sweetness. > It doesn't really make that kind of contribution in cheesecake. > > There are a lot of people from alt.support.diet.low-carb here who can > probably explain this better than I can. The easy answer is, go ahead and > make it that way. There should be no problem. > > Carol Ah! Thanks, Carol. Now I'm encouraged to go ahead and whip one up for a dear neighbor who is really conscientious about his low-carb diet. He'd be much happier than if I said "But there are 'only' two tablespoons of sugar in that wee slice!" Felice |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Felice Friese" > wrote in message news:PV_wd.210565$5K2.68681@attbi_s03... > At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and said > you thought it could be made with Splenda. > > If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of > making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble > $10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! > > Thanks. > > Felice Have no fear! Cheesecake doesn't depend on sugar for structure or coloring, so it's completely safe to make it with Splenda. In fact, I've done it on several occasions. ![]() kimberly |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Felice Friese" > wrote in message news:PV_wd.210565$5K2.68681@attbi_s03... > At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and said > you thought it could be made with Splenda. > > If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of > making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble > $10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! > > Thanks. > > Felice Have no fear! Cheesecake doesn't depend on sugar for structure or coloring, so it's completely safe to make it with Splenda. In fact, I've done it on several occasions. ![]() kimberly |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2004-12-18, Felice Friese > wrote:
> If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of > making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble > $10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! Here's a cheesecake recipe from the low-carb chef on the Food Network: <http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/reci..._27072,00.html There's also some recipes for cheesecake on the Splenda website. Look under recipes: http://www.splenda.com/ nb |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2004-12-18, Felice Friese > wrote:
> If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of > making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble > $10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! Here's a cheesecake recipe from the low-carb chef on the Food Network: <http://www.foodnetwork.com/food/reci..._27072,00.html There's also some recipes for cheesecake on the Splenda website. Look under recipes: http://www.splenda.com/ nb |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Felice Friese" > wrote:
>At least I think it was you, who thanked me for a cheesecake recipe and said >you thought it could be made with Splenda. > >If it was, and if you do, can you let me know how it worked? I've thought of >making this for several Atkins acolytes, but I've been hesitant to gamble >$10 worth of dairy goodies by experimenting with Splenda! > >Thanks. > >Felice Been making them for weeks now, they have been well received even by people not on diets. I use the splenda baking blend (basically half-sugar half splenda) and I substitue half the graham crackers with ground almonds. The almonds raise the fat/calories but cut carbs and add fiber. I moderate the fat/calories as well by using three different cream cheeses: one fat-free(ups carbs), one 1/3 less fat, one regular. My neighbor is on South Beach so she appreciates the lower fat/calorie content. The way I made them it is 40% less carbs, 200% more fiber, and 20% less fat/calories. If you use liqud splenda you'd bring the carbs and calories down further. DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:52:24 GMT, DigitalVinyl > wrote:
>Been making them for weeks now, they have been well received even by >people not on diets. I use the splenda baking blend (basically >half-sugar half splenda) and I substitue half the graham crackers with >ground almonds. The almonds raise the fat/calories but cut carbs and >add fiber. I moderate the fat/calories as well by using three >different cream cheeses: one fat-free(ups carbs), one 1/3 less fat, >one regular. My neighbor is on South Beach so she appreciates the >lower fat/calorie content. The way I made them it is 40% less carbs, >200% more fiber, and 20% less fat/calories. If you use liqud splenda >you'd bring the carbs and calories down further. Thank you for posting this, DV. I seem unable to stay strictly low carb, so moderate carb recipes are a Good Thing. This post is a keeper. Carol -- "Years ago my mother used to say to me... She'd say, 'In this world Elwood, you must be oh-so smart or oh-so pleasant.' Well, for years I was smart.... I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." *James Stewart* in the 1950 movie, _Harvey_ |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 15:52:24 GMT, DigitalVinyl > wrote:
>Been making them for weeks now, they have been well received even by >people not on diets. I use the splenda baking blend (basically >half-sugar half splenda) and I substitue half the graham crackers with >ground almonds. The almonds raise the fat/calories but cut carbs and >add fiber. I moderate the fat/calories as well by using three >different cream cheeses: one fat-free(ups carbs), one 1/3 less fat, >one regular. My neighbor is on South Beach so she appreciates the >lower fat/calorie content. The way I made them it is 40% less carbs, >200% more fiber, and 20% less fat/calories. If you use liqud splenda >you'd bring the carbs and calories down further. Thank you for posting this, DV. I seem unable to stay strictly low carb, so moderate carb recipes are a Good Thing. This post is a keeper. Carol -- "Years ago my mother used to say to me... She'd say, 'In this world Elwood, you must be oh-so smart or oh-so pleasant.' Well, for years I was smart.... I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." *James Stewart* in the 1950 movie, _Harvey_ |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Damsel in dis Dress > wrote:
>Virtually any cheesecake can be made with Splenda, because the structural >integrity of a cheesecake isn't compromised by the deletion of sugar. >Sugar in baked goods serves a function other than just adding sweetness. >It doesn't really make that kind of contribution in cheesecake. Is this really true? I wonder cause the consistency of the cheesecakes I've made is the biggest difference from really good cheesecakes I see made professionally. Mine are creamier/mushier than others. A good cheesecake has a firmness and tightness that I'm not getting. I've been making a pumpkin cheesecake a lot and I just made a large one for an office tomorrow. No low-carb on this one thought: all sugar/brown sugar, condensed milk, 5 eggs, Nilla wafer & graham cracker crust. Although the damn waterbath leaked in and now I may have soggy sides. Waterbathes are a pain in the ***. DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DigitalVinyl > wrote:
>Damsel in dis Dress > wrote: > >>Virtually any cheesecake can be made with Splenda, because the structural >>integrity of a cheesecake isn't compromised by the deletion of sugar. >>Sugar in baked goods serves a function other than just adding sweetness. >>It doesn't really make that kind of contribution in cheesecake. > >Is this really true? Okay just found this on the SPlenda site: TEXTURE ======= • Jams, jellies, puddings and custards: When made with SPLENDA® Granular, these may be slightly thinner or soft-set. • Cookies: Cookies often rely on brown sugar for their chewy, crunchy texture. To retain the texture, replace only the white granulated sugar in your cookie recipes. You may need to flatten the cookies before baking to aid spreading. I thought CHeesecake is technically a kind of custard, so texture is going to change (softer) with less sugar. I'll know when I cut this cheesecake tomorrow. Other places they say sugar proviedes rise/structure. >I wonder cause the consistency of the cheesecakes I've made is the >biggest difference from really good cheesecakes I see made >professionally. Mine are creamier/mushier than others. A good >cheesecake has a firmness and tightness that I'm not getting. I've >been making a pumpkin cheesecake a lot and I just made a large one for >an office tomorrow. No low-carb on this one thought: all sugar/brown >sugar, condensed milk, 5 eggs, Nilla wafer & graham cracker crust. >Although the damn waterbath leaked in and now I may have soggy sides. >Waterbathes are a pain in the ***. > >DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.equal.com/Recipes/Detail....ork+Cheesecake
Above is a recipe that uses no real sugar. If you look at the picture at the top you see that the cheesecake looks like wet stucco. This is te texture I'm seeing with Splenda Baking blend (half real sugar). Granted mine don't look anywhere near as bad as that picture, but when you cut the cheeseake the knife has it stuck all over. It is just much softer than I expect cheesecake to be. Anyone find a good recipe for tightening the texture up? I'm thinking additional eggs, extra cornstarch? Maybe longer cooking times (may crack worse)? DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DigitalVinyl wrote:
> > Been making them for weeks now, they have been well received even by > people not on diets. I use the splenda baking blend (basically > half-sugar half splenda) and I substitue half the graham crackers with > ground almonds. The almonds raise the fat/calories but cut carbs and > add fiber. I moderate the fat/calories as well by using three > different cream cheeses: one fat-free(ups carbs), one 1/3 less fat, > one regular. My neighbor is on South Beach so she appreciates the > lower fat/calorie content. The way I made them it is 40% less carbs, > 200% more fiber, and 20% less fat/calories. If you use liqud splenda > you'd bring the carbs and calories down further. > DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) How obvious is the substitution in the crust? I have been thinking about doing that but don't quite dare, because my daughter might not eat it. -- Jean B. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jean B." > wrote:
>DigitalVinyl wrote: >> >> Been making them for weeks now, they have been well received even by >> people not on diets. I use the splenda baking blend (basically >> half-sugar half splenda) and I substitue half the graham crackers with >> ground almonds. The almonds raise the fat/calories but cut carbs and >> add fiber. I moderate the fat/calories as well by using three >> different cream cheeses: one fat-free(ups carbs), one 1/3 less fat, >> one regular. My neighbor is on South Beach so she appreciates the >> lower fat/calorie content. The way I made them it is 40% less carbs, >> 200% more fiber, and 20% less fat/calories. If you use liqud splenda >> you'd bring the carbs and calories down further. >> DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) > >How obvious is the substitution in the crust? I have been >thinking about doing that but don't quite dare, because my >daughter might not eat it. It is noticeable, in taste and texture. The almonds never get as fine as graham crackers(maybe your food processor will do better). Some will look like small sesame seeds in the crust. Really pulverize them in your blender/chopper. What I would suggest is subbing a smaller percentage as almonds. I do 50% almonds. First time, measure out a cup of graham crackers then scoop out back out two tablespoons (1/8 cup) and replace that with two tablespoons of almonds. That would be 12.5% almonds. If that gets by, next time try 1/4 almonds, 3/4 graham cracker. My neighbor really likes the nuttiness and so far the taste has been big with adults. I tried walnuts and pecans but I like almonds the best, walnuts the least. Put the almonds in a powerful chopper/food processor and just let it churn until they are as fine as you can make them. I have a small one that lets me do small amounts. Sometimes in a bigger unit you would have to process a larger amount or everything flies away from the blade or passes underneath. You will notice that they will clump slightly--similar to the way the crumbs look after butter is added. I think the fat of the nuts produces a wetter crumb. You can reduce the amount of butter you add slightly. I also add some cinnamon to the crust--my first reasoning there was to disguise some of the almond flavor. I was also making a pumpkin cheesecake so I thought the cinnamon crsut would compliment it. I also made eggnog whipped cream for it which was really good! DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DigitalVinyl wrote:
> > It is noticeable, in taste and texture. The almonds never get as fine > as graham crackers(maybe your food processor will do better). Some > will look like small sesame seeds in the crust. Really pulverize them > in your blender/chopper. What I would suggest is subbing a smaller > percentage as almonds. I do 50% almonds. First time, measure out a cup > of graham crackers then scoop out back out two tablespoons (1/8 cup) > and replace that with two tablespoons of almonds. That would be 12.5% > almonds. If that gets by, next time try 1/4 almonds, 3/4 graham > cracker. > > My neighbor really likes the nuttiness and so far the taste has been > big with adults. I tried walnuts and pecans but I like almonds the > best, walnuts the least. > > Put the almonds in a powerful chopper/food processor and just let it > churn until they are as fine as you can make them. I have a small one > that lets me do small amounts. Sometimes in a bigger unit you would > have to process a larger amount or everything flies away from the > blade or passes underneath. You will notice that they will clump > slightly--similar to the way the crumbs look after butter is added. I > think the fat of the nuts produces a wetter crumb. You can reduce the > amount of butter you add slightly. I also add some cinnamon to the > crust--my first reasoning there was to disguise some of the almond > flavor. I was also making a pumpkin cheesecake so I thought the > cinnamon crsut would compliment it. I also made eggnog whipped cream > for it which was really good! > > DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) Thanks! I should probably start with much less than half for my daughter's sake. I do have almond flour (a bit gritty), so I don't have to pulverize the almonds myself. (I also have pecan and hazelnut flours and am thinking pecan flour might be even better.) And cinnamon is a must in my GC crust anyway! -- Jean B. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DigitalVinyl" > wrote :
> http://www.equal.com/Recipes/Detail....ork+Cheesecake > > Above is a recipe that uses no real sugar. If you look at the picture > at the top you see that the cheesecake looks like wet stucco. This is > te texture I'm seeing with Splenda Baking blend (half real sugar). > Granted mine don't look anywhere near as bad as that picture, but when > you cut the cheeseake the knife has it stuck all over. It is just much > softer than I expect cheesecake to be. Well, they can certainly get that way...what I do is NOT use a water bath. I think they're too much damned trouble, and as you found, more likely than not to leak in and make the bottom of your cake a soggy mess. Here's what I do: 1. Blind-bake the crust. Let it cool, then fill just before baking. Make sure your batter didn't just come out of the fridge. 2. After you remove the crust from the oven, place a pan of water (I use a big aluminum-foil roaster supported by a jelly-roll pan) on the low rack) in the oven. If you can't lug the half-full pan of water across the kitchen (a tough job), try putting it in the oven first, then filling with a watering can (preferably a new one; you don't want Miracle-Geo fumes in yer oven). 3. Bake at 375F for 15 minutes (for a 9" pan; 12 minutes for smaller pans, 20 for larger), then lower the temp to 290 until it's done. You'll know it's done when the top is no longer shiny, and poking the side of the pan gets you a jiggle like a block of Jello, rather than a slosh like one might get from a custard. Total baking time seems to run about 1 to 1.5 hours, depending on the size of the pan and how full it is. 4. When the cake is "done," turn the oven off, open the door a crack and let it sit in there for an hour or two, or even overnight (if it's evening already). Really firms it up, and sharply reduces cracking. If you're afraid to let it go until it's done for fear of burning or overly drying the cake, turn the oven off just short of that point I mentioned before, but DON'T open it. It'll still cool off fast enough, and the reduced heat usually cooks the center adequately. 5. I find long-bladed boning knives warmed in hot (boiling really) water best for slicing cheesecakes - they have a smaller flat area and a longer, thinner blade. And just shake the excess water from the blade- leave some on and you'll get a smoother side to the slices. 6. Lastly, make it two or three days ahead if you can - the flavor seems to mature over that time, and some of the excess moisture will evaporate in the fridge. They get covered with plastic wrap after a couple days, so as to not dry out. I, for example, made my Christmas Eve cheesecake on Monday, and one for Christmas Day just this (Wed) evening. > Anyone find a good recipe for tightening the texture up? I'm thinking > additional eggs, I find using a mixture of whole eggs and yolks to be helpful - a 3:2 yolk:egg ratio seems to work best.. I haven't used cornstarch, flour or anything similar in my cheesecakes since I got the egg idea from an episode of "Good Eats." Jason |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jean B." > wrote:
>Thanks! I should probably start with much less than half for my >daughter's sake. I do have almond flour (a bit gritty), so I >don't have to pulverize the almonds myself. (I also have pecan >and hazelnut flours and am thinking pecan flour might be even >better.) And cinnamon is a must in my GC crust anyway! >-- >Jean B. I'm not sure a nut flour would work better. I mixed in some of a low-carb flour substitute twice and each time the crust came out too moist and kinda chewy-not altogether good. One of those times the water bath leaked and the crust just soaked up wth water like a sponge and was soggy when I first unpanned it. That actually gave me a good idea which has since worked. SInce flour is cheap... I lay down two sheets of reynolds wrap on top of eachother, toss a nice layer of flour that is larger than the springform down in the center, set the springform into the flour. Then wrap the edges of the reynolds wrap up the sides. Then into the water bath. When water does leak into the inner layer it get soaked up by the flour. Has worked twice catching little spills. I think the flour may actually gum up any tiny holes that open in the foil. SO they absorb some and stop the leak to boot. WooHoo! Well gotta get back to cooking. Making 4 dozen mini-cheescakes, 12 different varieties to bring to parties. DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jason Quick" > wrote:
>"DigitalVinyl" > wrote : >> http://www.equal.com/Recipes/Detail....ork+Cheesecake >> >> Above is a recipe that uses no real sugar. If you look at the picture >> at the top you see that the cheesecake looks like wet stucco. This is >> te texture I'm seeing with Splenda Baking blend (half real sugar). >> Granted mine don't look anywhere near as bad as that picture, but when >> you cut the cheeseake the knife has it stuck all over. It is just much >> softer than I expect cheesecake to be. > >Well, they can certainly get that way...what I do is NOT use a water bath. >I think they're too much damned trouble, and as you found, more likely than >not to leak in and make the bottom of your cake a soggy mess. Here's what >I do: > >1. Blind-bake the crust. Let it cool, then fill just before baking. Make >sure your batter didn't just come out of the fridge. > >2. After you remove the crust from the oven, place a pan of water (I use a >big aluminum-foil roaster supported by a jelly-roll pan) on the low rack) in >the oven. If you can't lug the half-full pan of water across the kitchen (a >tough job), try putting it in the oven first, then filling with a watering >can (preferably a new one; you don't want Miracle-Geo fumes in yer oven). > >3. Bake at 375F for 15 minutes (for a 9" pan; 12 minutes for smaller pans, >20 for larger), then lower the temp to 290 until it's done. You'll know >it's done when the top is no longer shiny, and poking the side of the pan >gets you a jiggle like a block of Jello, rather than a slosh like one might >get from a custard. Total baking time seems to run about 1 to 1.5 hours, >depending on the size of the pan and how full it is. > >4. When the cake is "done," turn the oven off, open the door a crack and let >it sit in there for an hour or two, or even overnight (if it's evening >already). Really firms it up, and sharply reduces cracking. If you're >afraid to let it go until it's done for fear of burning or overly drying the >cake, turn the oven off just short of that point I mentioned before, but >DON'T open it. It'll still cool off fast enough, and the reduced heat >usually cooks the center adequately. > >5. I find long-bladed boning knives warmed in hot (boiling really) water >best for slicing cheesecakes - they have a smaller flat area and a longer, >thinner blade. And just shake the excess water from the blade- leave some >on and you'll get a smoother side to the slices. > >6. Lastly, make it two or three days ahead if you can - the flavor seems to >mature over that time, and some of the excess moisture will evaporate in the >fridge. They get covered with plastic wrap after a couple days, so as to >not dry out. I, for example, made my Christmas Eve cheesecake on Monday, >and one for Christmas Day just this (Wed) evening. > >> Anyone find a good recipe for tightening the texture up? I'm thinking >> additional eggs, > >I find using a mixture of whole eggs and yolks to be helpful - a 3:2 >yolk:egg ratio seems to work best.. I am using near the same ratio. 7:5 for a 10 inch. And my last two batches are showing better texture and better height & volume (especially now that I'm whipping the egg whites corrrectly!). My 8 inch recipe now makes a filled-to the top 8-inch plus 5-6 mini cupcakes--I've got to adjust those recipes. >I haven't used cornstarch, flour or >anything similar in my cheesecakes since I got the egg idea from an episode >of "Good Eats." I've been reducing fat/calories by making them with 1/3 fat free cream cheese 1/3 neufchatel cream cheese (1/3 less fat) 1/3 regualr cream cheese and the fat-free stuff is mushy as all hell. I spotted tips that say to add a tbsp of cornstarch to compensate for the softer texture. I know cornstarch also makes the water bath unnecessary, but I find they cook better. Also I think I've found an insurance for the water leakage problem. Sit the springform in a layer of flour in the standard foil wrap around the springform. Any water that gets in is adsorbed by the flour and I think the flour gums up holes and slows leaks. I'm doing mini cheesecakes now. I'm using the foil cups-no muffin pans neccessary. Without a water bath they fell--still tasted good. So I used a Hefty foil lasagne pan(13.25 x 9.63 x 2.75) filled 1/3 with water and then put in a Hefty foil cake pan(13x9x2). They fit perfectly inside eachother, the rims sit so the cake pan never touches the lasagne bottom. I then put a dozen muffin foils in there. They came out perfectly, not a single one fell, they cooked evenly and well--even with all the different additions in one batch (snickers & milky way dark bars, cookie dough, brownie chunk, peanut butter, amoretta, anisette, cappucino, etc.) >Jason DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DigitalVinyl" > wrote: >I wrote: >>DV wrote: >>> Anyone find a good recipe for tightening the texture up? I'm thinking >>> additional eggs, >> >>I find using a mixture of whole eggs and yolks to be helpful - a 3:2 >>yolk:egg ratio seems to work best.. > > I am using near the same ratio. 7:5 for a 10 inch. And my last two > batches are showing better texture and better height & volume > (especially now that I'm whipping the egg whites corrrectly!). Heh. You're far more ambitious than I; whipping egg whites is something I only do for meringues and if I have to. : ) I find that the higher starting temp that I mentioned before lends some height as well; the heat causes 'em to puff up a bit. Have to watch 'em, though, since they can crack that way too. But cracks can be fixed - put the thing in the freezer 'til it's almost frozen, then use the edge of a knife dipped in hot water to smooth the cracks out...go along the cracks, THEN across. > I've been reducing fat/calories by making them with > 1/3 fat free cream cheese > 1/3 neufchatel cream cheese (1/3 less fat) > 1/3 regualr cream cheese > and the fat-free stuff is mushy as all hell. Hm. Have you considered low-fat ricotta? Nice texture, especially if you run it through a food processor w/ some half&half first, and unlike fat-free CC, it can still be called "cheese" without feeling like you're a liar. But IMHO, cheesecake is one of those things that one eats fairly infrequently, so you can afford to splurge on the calories. On a related note, I was making tiramisu last night and made the mistake of looking at the calories in the mascarpone cheese....EEK! It's *so* good, though. > Also I think I've found an insurance for the water > leakage problem. Sit the springform in a layer of flour in the > standard foil wrap around the springform. Any water that gets in is > adsorbed by the flour and I think the flour gums up holes and slows > leaks. Part of the solution is also to buy good-quality springforms...they don't tend to get out of round so easily. Kaiser's "Noblesse" line is very good; their "La Forme" line even better. There are also loose-bottomed cheesecake pans, which have no spring to them at all. See them he http://www.cooking.com/products/shpr...0&ClassNo=0224 If you're feeling ballsy, you can even make 'em in a regular 3" deep cake pan - just make sure to use a heavy pan, grease the bottom well, and put a layer of parchment over the grease. Then you can *float* the damned things in a bain-marie and they won't leak. : ) > I'm doing mini cheesecakes now. I'm using the foil cups-no muffin pans > neccessary. Without a water bath they fell--still tasted good. Aye, that's actually the one sort of thing where I *will* use a water bath - otherwise you either get cakes that are rock-hard on the edges and raw in the middle, or they go all to hell. Also have to bake 'em at a lower, constant temp, like no higher than 280F. Jason |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DigitalVinyl" > wrote: >I wrote: >>DV wrote: >>> Anyone find a good recipe for tightening the texture up? I'm thinking >>> additional eggs, >> >>I find using a mixture of whole eggs and yolks to be helpful - a 3:2 >>yolk:egg ratio seems to work best.. > > I am using near the same ratio. 7:5 for a 10 inch. And my last two > batches are showing better texture and better height & volume > (especially now that I'm whipping the egg whites corrrectly!). Heh. You're far more ambitious than I; whipping egg whites is something I only do for meringues and if I have to. : ) I find that the higher starting temp that I mentioned before lends some height as well; the heat causes 'em to puff up a bit. Have to watch 'em, though, since they can crack that way too. But cracks can be fixed - put the thing in the freezer 'til it's almost frozen, then use the edge of a knife dipped in hot water to smooth the cracks out...go along the cracks, THEN across. > I've been reducing fat/calories by making them with > 1/3 fat free cream cheese > 1/3 neufchatel cream cheese (1/3 less fat) > 1/3 regualr cream cheese > and the fat-free stuff is mushy as all hell. Hm. Have you considered low-fat ricotta? Nice texture, especially if you run it through a food processor w/ some half&half first, and unlike fat-free CC, it can still be called "cheese" without feeling like you're a liar. But IMHO, cheesecake is one of those things that one eats fairly infrequently, so you can afford to splurge on the calories. On a related note, I was making tiramisu last night and made the mistake of looking at the calories in the mascarpone cheese....EEK! It's *so* good, though. > Also I think I've found an insurance for the water > leakage problem. Sit the springform in a layer of flour in the > standard foil wrap around the springform. Any water that gets in is > adsorbed by the flour and I think the flour gums up holes and slows > leaks. Part of the solution is also to buy good-quality springforms...they don't tend to get out of round so easily. Kaiser's "Noblesse" line is very good; their "La Forme" line even better. There are also loose-bottomed cheesecake pans, which have no spring to them at all. See them he http://www.cooking.com/products/shpr...0&ClassNo=0224 If you're feeling ballsy, you can even make 'em in a regular 3" deep cake pan - just make sure to use a heavy pan, grease the bottom well, and put a layer of parchment over the grease. Then you can *float* the damned things in a bain-marie and they won't leak. : ) > I'm doing mini cheesecakes now. I'm using the foil cups-no muffin pans > neccessary. Without a water bath they fell--still tasted good. Aye, that's actually the one sort of thing where I *will* use a water bath - otherwise you either get cakes that are rock-hard on the edges and raw in the middle, or they go all to hell. Also have to bake 'em at a lower, constant temp, like no higher than 280F. Jason |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There is a neat trick to cutting cheesecake... use "dental floss"!
Hold a length of it taught and run it through the cheesecake. Works like a charm! No mess, no sticking. Comes out great every time! FYI... saw it on the Food Network. Steve "Jason Quick" > wrote in message ... > "DigitalVinyl" > wrote : >> http://www.equal.com/Recipes/Detail....ork+Cheesecake >> > > 5. I find long-bladed boning knives warmed in hot (boiling really) water > best for slicing cheesecakes - they have a smaller flat area and a longer, > thinner blade. And just shake the excess water from the blade- leave > some on and you'll get a smoother side to the slices. > > I find using a mixture of whole eggs and yolks to be helpful - a 3:2 > yolk:egg ratio seems to work best.. I haven't used cornstarch, flour or > anything similar in my cheesecakes since I got the egg idea from an > episode of "Good Eats." > > Jason > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jason Quick" > wrote:
>Heh. You're far more ambitious than I; whipping egg whites is something I >only do for meringues and if I have to. : ) I've got it down now, so no biggie, a minute or two by hand and their perfect. And the volume of the batter really increases. >I find that the higher starting temp that I mentioned before lends some >height as well; the heat causes 'em to puff up a bit. Have to watch 'em, >though, since they can crack that way too. But cracks can be fixed - put >the thing in the freezer 'til it's almost frozen, then use the edge of a >knife dipped in hot water to smooth the cracks out...go along the cracks, >THEN across. I've seen the two temperature stage cooking method in recipes. I will try that, especially now that I think i've gotten the ingredients down to the right amounts. I'm tweaking sweeteness now. >> I've been reducing fat/calories by making them with >> 1/3 fat free cream cheese >> 1/3 neufchatel cream cheese (1/3 less fat) >> 1/3 regualr cream cheese >> and the fat-free stuff is mushy as all hell. > >Hm. Have you considered low-fat ricotta? Nice texture, especially if you >run it through a food processor w/ some half&half first, and unlike fat-free >CC, it can still be called "cheese" without feeling like you're a liar. But >IMHO, cheesecake is one of those things that one eats fairly infrequently, >so you can afford to splurge on the calories. Well since it is one of the easier desserts to make low carb, I'm trying to do different flavors and use it as a basis for more often desserts. I made some espresso flavored ones that were really good. Even the ones with the liqueurs that I'm not crazy (Anisette, Amaretto). So far they've been well received. >On a related note, I was making tiramisu last night and made the mistake of >looking at the calories in the mascarpone cheese....EEK! It's *so* good, >though. Well that's why I'd like to moderate the carbs/fat/calories as long as I still end up with a rich dessert. So far a success... even non dieters are liking it a lot. >> Also I think I've found an insurance for the water >> leakage problem. Sit the springform in a layer of flour in the >> standard foil wrap around the springform. Any water that gets in is >> adsorbed by the flour and I think the flour gums up holes and slows >> leaks. > >Part of the solution is also to buy good-quality springforms...they don't >tend to get out of round so easily. Kaiser's "Noblesse" line is very good; >their "La Forme" line even better. There are also loose-bottomed cheesecake >pans, which have no spring to them at all. See them he > >http://www.cooking.com/products/shpr...0&ClassNo=0224 > >If you're feeling ballsy, you can even make 'em in a regular 3" deep cake >pan - just make sure to use a heavy pan, grease the bottom well, and put a >layer of parchment over the grease. Then you can *float* the damned things >in a bain-marie and they won't leak. : ) You know I was thinking of doing this because the way I make them there is no chance of them sticking. I parchment the bottom and all the sides. When I'm done my springforms are clean except for traces of butter. So I think I can do a cake pan without any problem! >> I'm doing mini cheesecakes now. I'm using the foil cups-no muffin pans >> neccessary. Without a water bath they fell--still tasted good. > >Aye, that's actually the one sort of thing where I *will* use a water bath - >otherwise you either get cakes that are rock-hard on the edges and raw in >the middle, or they go all to hell. Also have to bake 'em at a lower, >constant temp, like no higher than 280F. I've been baking them at 325 and they seem to be okay. Won't know for sure until people start eating them tonight (24 hours after cooked). The minis set much faster. The cake are better after 2 days in the fridge. One day and the minis were good. I'm also happy to say that I successfully made a half dozen in my toaster oven using the standard toaster-oven tray with water in it. Cooking time was longer than in the oven--But I think their ok! I ran out fo room in the oven and had spare batter... >Jason > DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jason Quick" > wrote:
>Heh. You're far more ambitious than I; whipping egg whites is something I >only do for meringues and if I have to. : ) I've got it down now, so no biggie, a minute or two by hand and their perfect. And the volume of the batter really increases. >I find that the higher starting temp that I mentioned before lends some >height as well; the heat causes 'em to puff up a bit. Have to watch 'em, >though, since they can crack that way too. But cracks can be fixed - put >the thing in the freezer 'til it's almost frozen, then use the edge of a >knife dipped in hot water to smooth the cracks out...go along the cracks, >THEN across. I've seen the two temperature stage cooking method in recipes. I will try that, especially now that I think i've gotten the ingredients down to the right amounts. I'm tweaking sweeteness now. >> I've been reducing fat/calories by making them with >> 1/3 fat free cream cheese >> 1/3 neufchatel cream cheese (1/3 less fat) >> 1/3 regualr cream cheese >> and the fat-free stuff is mushy as all hell. > >Hm. Have you considered low-fat ricotta? Nice texture, especially if you >run it through a food processor w/ some half&half first, and unlike fat-free >CC, it can still be called "cheese" without feeling like you're a liar. But >IMHO, cheesecake is one of those things that one eats fairly infrequently, >so you can afford to splurge on the calories. Well since it is one of the easier desserts to make low carb, I'm trying to do different flavors and use it as a basis for more often desserts. I made some espresso flavored ones that were really good. Even the ones with the liqueurs that I'm not crazy (Anisette, Amaretto). So far they've been well received. >On a related note, I was making tiramisu last night and made the mistake of >looking at the calories in the mascarpone cheese....EEK! It's *so* good, >though. Well that's why I'd like to moderate the carbs/fat/calories as long as I still end up with a rich dessert. So far a success... even non dieters are liking it a lot. >> Also I think I've found an insurance for the water >> leakage problem. Sit the springform in a layer of flour in the >> standard foil wrap around the springform. Any water that gets in is >> adsorbed by the flour and I think the flour gums up holes and slows >> leaks. > >Part of the solution is also to buy good-quality springforms...they don't >tend to get out of round so easily. Kaiser's "Noblesse" line is very good; >their "La Forme" line even better. There are also loose-bottomed cheesecake >pans, which have no spring to them at all. See them he > >http://www.cooking.com/products/shpr...0&ClassNo=0224 > >If you're feeling ballsy, you can even make 'em in a regular 3" deep cake >pan - just make sure to use a heavy pan, grease the bottom well, and put a >layer of parchment over the grease. Then you can *float* the damned things >in a bain-marie and they won't leak. : ) You know I was thinking of doing this because the way I make them there is no chance of them sticking. I parchment the bottom and all the sides. When I'm done my springforms are clean except for traces of butter. So I think I can do a cake pan without any problem! >> I'm doing mini cheesecakes now. I'm using the foil cups-no muffin pans >> neccessary. Without a water bath they fell--still tasted good. > >Aye, that's actually the one sort of thing where I *will* use a water bath - >otherwise you either get cakes that are rock-hard on the edges and raw in >the middle, or they go all to hell. Also have to bake 'em at a lower, >constant temp, like no higher than 280F. I've been baking them at 325 and they seem to be okay. Won't know for sure until people start eating them tonight (24 hours after cooked). The minis set much faster. The cake are better after 2 days in the fridge. One day and the minis were good. I'm also happy to say that I successfully made a half dozen in my toaster oven using the standard toaster-oven tray with water in it. Cooking time was longer than in the oven--But I think their ok! I ran out fo room in the oven and had spare batter... >Jason > DiGiTAL_ViNYL (no email) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ping Damsel | General Cooking | |||
Ping: Damsel | General Cooking | |||
Ping:Damsel | General Cooking | |||
PING: Damsel | General Cooking | |||
Ping: Damsel | General Cooking |