well, nice sleuthing guys.
Honestly though, was it that hard? I mean, it says "Knectar" write on
the front page (in fact every page). While I must apologize for my
somewhat transparent attempt at as you say, PR, I have to say, it's a
bit sad that folks reactions are so instinctively negative and
paranoid.

Yes, it was perhaps in bad taste to do a little flogging, but I would
and will swear by the site's value. The javascript errors are indeed a
bug, to be fixed very shortly. Thank you for this feedback. There are
probably more technical glitches to be discovered than anyone here,
myself included, can count. This is called development (as it says
clearly on the site as well). I welcome one and all to contribute, if
you so choose.

Then, we are left with an extremely useful site. One which I am perhaps
the most prolific user. It is a literally two weeks old. I personally
rely on it exclusively for all of my organization. It uses encryption
to protect all data, so that even I, as the webmaster and developer
cannot physically read anything anyone has written (except my own stuff
after logging in). As it states clearly in the terms, no user
information will be shared or abused in any way. As for goodwill toward
my fellow men. Well, actually, yes. I built the site originally for my
own use, but as friends started using it, I decided to expand it's
functionality, as well as increase its reach. Needless to say, I think
it's super useful.

Anyway, thank you for your comments. This kind of feedback is more than
helpful. You can use the fully integrated email functionality to
contact me directly from flynote, if you choose. And I will refrain
from any further "flogging" based on this highly negative feedback.

-Chris

ps. what are the odds that you'd get as detailed response such as this
from a Microsoft programmer.

Anyway, enjoy yourselves.

> wrote in message
ups.com...
> well, nice sleuthing guys.
> Honestly though, was it that hard? I mean, it says "Knectar" write on
> the front page (in fact every page). While I must apologize for my
> somewhat transparent attempt at as you say, PR, I have to say, it's a
> bit sad that folks reactions are so instinctively negative and
> paranoid.
>
> Yes, it was perhaps in bad taste to do a little flogging, but I would
> and will swear by the site's value. The javascript errors are indeed a
> bug, to be fixed very shortly. Thank you for this feedback. There are
> probably more technical glitches to be discovered than anyone here,
> myself included, can count. This is called development (as it says
> clearly on the site as well). I welcome one and all to contribute, if
> you so choose.
>
> Then, we are left with an extremely useful site. One which I am perhaps
> the most prolific user. It is a literally two weeks old. I personally
> rely on it exclusively for all of my organization. It uses encryption
> to protect all data, so that even I, as the webmaster and developer
> cannot physically read anything anyone has written (except my own stuff
> after logging in). As it states clearly in the terms, no user
> information will be shared or abused in any way. As for goodwill toward
> my fellow men. Well, actually, yes. I built the site originally for my
> own use, but as friends started using it, I decided to expand it's
> functionality, as well as increase its reach. Needless to say, I think
> it's super useful.
>
> Anyway, thank you for your comments. This kind of feedback is more than
> helpful. You can use the fully integrated email functionality to
> contact me directly from flynote, if you choose. And I will refrain
> from any further "flogging" based on this highly negative feedback.
>
> -Chris
>
> ps. what are the odds that you'd get as detailed response such as this
> from a Microsoft programmer.
>

detailed, yep, useful, nado!