A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is it the
'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type of groups ?


http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php

--
Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz

"Bigbazza" > wrote in message
...
>A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is it the
>'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type of groups ?
>
>
> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>
> --
> Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz
>

Cute
Proper posting and common sense are never wrong.

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
m...
>
> "Bigbazza" > wrote in message
> ...
>>A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is it the
>>'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type of groups ?
>>
>>
>> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>>
>> --
>> Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz
>>
>
> Cute
> Proper posting and common sense are never wrong.

Common sense is *often* wrong.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Peter Aitken wrote:
> "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> m...
>>
>> "Bigbazza" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is
>>> it the 'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type
>>> of groups ?
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz
>>>
>>
>> Cute
>> Proper posting and common sense are never wrong.
>
> Common sense is *often* wrong.

Or people don't have any

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
>> "Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> m...
>>>
>>> "Bigbazza" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is
>>>> it the 'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type
>>>> of groups ?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz
>>>>
>>>
>>> Cute
>>> Proper posting and common sense are never wrong.
>>
>> Common sense is *often* wrong.
>
> Or people don't have any
>
> Jill
>

But everyone thinks that *they* have common sense - it's the other guy who
doesn't!


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Bigbazza wrote:
> A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is it the
> 'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type of groups ?
>
>
> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>

If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
posting standards it's probably not worth reading.

Bigbazza wrote:
> A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is it the
> 'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type of groups ?
>
>
> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>

If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
posting standards it's probably not worth reading.

"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
news:KAhEd.79423$QR1.32943@fed1read04...
> Bigbazza wrote:
>> A good sight I found ...on 'Posting'....Who agrees with it ?....Is it the
>> 'correct' way in all Newsgroups ?...or only in 'some' type of groups ?
>>
>>
>> http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/posting.php
>>
>
> If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
> posting standards it's probably not worth reading.

So far this is the dumbest post of the year.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Peter Aitken wrote:

>>If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
>>posting standards it's probably not worth reading.
>
>
> So far this is the dumbest post of the year.
>
>

Nope. Your post takes that honor. If they cannot produce a site
explaining posting standards using html or plain text it's not worth
reading. A lot of sites use flash to send ads, or other similar
material. Anyone who cannot explain posting standards using plain text
or html should return their computer as they are too ignorant to operate
it properly.

Peter Aitken wrote:

>>If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
>>posting standards it's probably not worth reading.
>
>
> So far this is the dumbest post of the year.
>
>

Nope. Your post takes that honor. If they cannot produce a site
explaining posting standards using html or plain text it's not worth
reading. A lot of sites use flash to send ads, or other similar
material. Anyone who cannot explain posting standards using plain text
or html should return their computer as they are too ignorant to operate
it properly.

"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
>
> If they cannot produce a site explaining posting standards using html or
> plain text it's not worth reading. A lot of sites use flash to send ads,
> or other similar material. Anyone who cannot explain posting standards
> using plain text or html should return their computer as they are too
> ignorant to operate it properly.

Since you did not see it, you missed the entire point of what it is about or
how it is done.

I'm sure Spielberg can make movies using black and white 35mm film, but
there is a reason he chooses not to.

"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
>
> If they cannot produce a site explaining posting standards using html or
> plain text it's not worth reading. A lot of sites use flash to send ads,
> or other similar material. Anyone who cannot explain posting standards
> using plain text or html should return their computer as they are too
> ignorant to operate it properly.

Since you did not see it, you missed the entire point of what it is about or
how it is done.

I'm sure Spielberg can make movies using black and white 35mm film, but
there is a reason he chooses not to.

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
. com...
>
> "CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
>>
>> If they cannot produce a site explaining posting standards using html or
>> plain text it's not worth reading. A lot of sites use flash to send ads,
>> or other similar material. Anyone who cannot explain posting standards
>> using plain text or html should return their computer as they are too
>> ignorant to operate it properly.
>
> Since you did not see it, you missed the entire point of what it is about
> or how it is done.
>
> I'm sure Spielberg can make movies using black and white 35mm film, but
> there is a reason he chooses not to.
>

Ditto....Ed

--
Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz

"Edwin Pawlowski" > wrote in message
. com...
>
> "CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
>>
>> If they cannot produce a site explaining posting standards using html or
>> plain text it's not worth reading. A lot of sites use flash to send ads,
>> or other similar material. Anyone who cannot explain posting standards
>> using plain text or html should return their computer as they are too
>> ignorant to operate it properly.
>
> Since you did not see it, you missed the entire point of what it is about
> or how it is done.
>
> I'm sure Spielberg can make movies using black and white 35mm film, but
> there is a reason he chooses not to.
>

Ditto....Ed

--
Bigbazza(Barry)..Oz

"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
news9lEd.79470$QR1.56557@fed1read04...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
>
>>>If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
>>>posting standards it's probably not worth reading.
>>
>>
>> So far this is the dumbest post of the year.
>>
>>
>
> Nope. Your post takes that honor. If they cannot produce a site explaining
> posting standards using html or plain text it's not worth reading. A lot
> of sites use flash to send ads, or other similar material. Anyone who
> cannot explain posting standards using plain text or html should return
> their computer as they are too ignorant to operate it properly.

You are astoundingly stupid. People use Flash because it can add animation,
sounds, and other features to a web page that you cannot get with HTML. It
is a lot more difficult than plain HTML, and people use it because they
prefer the results, not because they cannot do it with plain HTML. Sounds to
me that you do not understand Flash and are too dumb to figure out how to
use it, so you criticize those who can use it. Pitiful.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
news9lEd.79470$QR1.56557@fed1read04...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
>
>>>If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
>>>posting standards it's probably not worth reading.
>>
>>
>> So far this is the dumbest post of the year.
>>
>>
>
> Nope. Your post takes that honor. If they cannot produce a site explaining
> posting standards using html or plain text it's not worth reading. A lot
> of sites use flash to send ads, or other similar material. Anyone who
> cannot explain posting standards using plain text or html should return
> their computer as they are too ignorant to operate it properly.

You are astoundingly stupid. People use Flash because it can add animation,
sounds, and other features to a web page that you cannot get with HTML. It
is a lot more difficult than plain HTML, and people use it because they
prefer the results, not because they cannot do it with plain HTML. Sounds to
me that you do not understand Flash and are too dumb to figure out how to
use it, so you criticize those who can use it. Pitiful.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:41:51 GMT, "Peter Aitken"
> wrote:

>"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
>news9lEd.79470$QR1.56557@fed1read04...
>> Peter Aitken wrote:
>>
>>>>If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
>>>>posting standards it's probably not worth reading.
>>>
>>>
>>> So far this is the dumbest post of the year.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nope. Your post takes that honor. If they cannot produce a site explaining
>> posting standards using html or plain text it's not worth reading. A lot
>> of sites use flash to send ads, or other similar material. Anyone who
>> cannot explain posting standards using plain text or html should return
>> their computer as they are too ignorant to operate it properly.
>
>You are astoundingly stupid. People use Flash because it can add animation,
>sounds, and other features to a web page that you cannot get with HTML. It
>is a lot more difficult than plain HTML, and people use it because they
>prefer the results, not because they cannot do it with plain HTML. Sounds to
>me that you do not understand Flash and are too dumb to figure out how to
>use it, so you criticize those who can use it. Pitiful.

A majority of web design professionals disagree with you. Vehemently.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:41:51 GMT, "Peter Aitken"
> wrote:

>"CouldntCareLess" > wrote in message
>news9lEd.79470$QR1.56557@fed1read04...
>> Peter Aitken wrote:
>>
>>>>If they have to use Shockwave Flash to produce a site about newsgroup
>>>>posting standards it's probably not worth reading.
>>>
>>>
>>> So far this is the dumbest post of the year.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nope. Your post takes that honor. If they cannot produce a site explaining
>> posting standards using html or plain text it's not worth reading. A lot
>> of sites use flash to send ads, or other similar material. Anyone who
>> cannot explain posting standards using plain text or html should return
>> their computer as they are too ignorant to operate it properly.
>
>You are astoundingly stupid. People use Flash because it can add animation,
>sounds, and other features to a web page that you cannot get with HTML. It
>is a lot more difficult than plain HTML, and people use it because they
>prefer the results, not because they cannot do it with plain HTML. Sounds to
>me that you do not understand Flash and are too dumb to figure out how to
>use it, so you criticize those who can use it. Pitiful.

A majority of web design professionals disagree with you. Vehemently.

"Peter Aitken" > wrote in message
om...
>
> Common sense is *often* wrong.
>

It may be more correct to say that that many things which
may be labelled "common sense" are in reality neither.

Bob M.

"Peter Aitken" > wrote in message
om...
>
> Common sense is *often* wrong.
>

It may be more correct to say that that many things which
may be labelled "common sense" are in reality neither.

Bob M.

<Alan > wrote in message
> That's the point about the posting etiquette site which uses elaborate
> animations and graphics which use technology which can't be seen or
> communicated in text-based news groups!
>
> Get it?
>
>
>
>
> Alan Moorman

No, I don't. You surely don't either.

If you took the time to look at it, you would know it was a spoof. Get it?

You have to laugh at people that criticize things they have never seen and
know nothing about.