Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork.
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork. > I'd agree. Back ribs are a bigger treat than a steak. I only eat back ribs about four times a year, and so I don't parboil them. Parboiling is for wimps. For the next day or so, I walk around feeling full of pork fat, but it all seems to be worth it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
and the dylan content is:
"I'm longin' for that sweet fat that sticks to your ribs" 1/2 rack of baby back ribs with "i'd gladly pay you tuesday for a hamburger today" parboil. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had
shark steak, there really is no competition anymore. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
*****General wrote:
> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had > shark steak, there really is no competition anymore. > > *crossposting deleted * Boy, that's a tough question! Can I have both? ;-) -- Steve Every job is a self-portrait of the person who did it. Autograph your work with excellence. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "big macbeth" > wrote in message oups.com... > i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork. > I'll take the steak. Too many variable with pork ribs. You might get a slab that was boiled! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Calvin wrote:
> *****General wrote: >> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but >> now that I've had shark steak, there really is no >> competition anymore. > > *crossposting deleted * Good! > > Boy, that's a tough question! Can I have both? ;-) > Or all three...maybe not the same meal. BOB with ribs on the Kamado...going to be a good meal in about 4 hours |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Vox Humana" > wrote in message ... > > "big macbeth" > wrote in message > oups.com... >> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork. >> > > I'll take the steak. Too many variable with pork ribs. You might get a > slab that was boiled! Sounds better than sea slug! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had > shark steak, there really is no competition anymore. > > But was the shark steak juicy? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "don freeman" > wrote in message news:YBTJd.181471$8l.138640@pd7tw1no... > > >> Well up until last week it would have been the ribs but now that I've had >> shark steak, there really is no competition anymore. > But was the shark steak juicy? > About as juicy as a chicken steak, but nicer. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com>,
"big macbeth" > wrote: > i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork. Depends on what I am in the mood for. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.food.cooking Shawn Hearn > wrote:
: In article .com>, : "big macbeth" > wrote: :> i'd take the ribs but i don't eat pork. : Depends on what I am in the mood for. Spare ribs have more flavor and meat than baby backs. Baby backs are popular because of marketing hype and because it doesn't take a restaraunt as long to prepare them. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > Spare ribs have more flavor and meat than baby backs. Baby backs > are popular because of marketing hype and because it doesn't take > a restaraunt as long to prepare them. I've always thought of baby back ribs as spareribs. They seem to have more meat than the other spare ribs, which have a lot more fat and longer, bigger bones. The flavour always seemed better too. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Baby back is from the porkloin rib chop area.
Small bones [riblets] are from the porkloin loin chop area. Spare ribs are from the BostonButt [shoulder] + large rib area [below] the backribs.. -- Emil "don freeman" > wrote in message news ![]() > >> Spare ribs have more flavor and meat than baby backs. Baby backs >> are popular because of marketing hype and because it doesn't take >> a restaraunt as long to prepare them. > > > I've always thought of baby back ribs as spareribs. They seem to have more > meat than the other spare ribs, which have a lot more fat and longer, > bigger bones. The flavour always seemed better too. > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > Baby back is from the porkloin rib chop area. > Small bones [riblets] are from the porkloin loin chop area. > Spare ribs are from the BostonButt [shoulder] + large rib area [below] the > backribs.. > Thanks for this info. This is very interesting. I've noticed, if I get baby back ribs that are too meaty, they taste like pork chops. I must investigate real spare ribs. But aren't they much fattier than back ribs? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
babyback ribs | General Cooking | |||
babyback ribs | General Cooking | |||
babyback ribs | General Cooking | |||
BabyBack ribs hit $3.99/lb ... | Barbecue |