Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly less than
the actual measure." http://www.hormel.com/templates/know...temid=7&hlite= true&id=584&querytext=Measuring Nancree |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nancree wrote: > "Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly less than > the actual measure." > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their food has to be some of the worst on the market. I have never measured anything while cooking - learned to cook by eye (at about age 11) and have done so ever since. I do sometimes measure when baking, if it isn't something I make often. I don't bake a lot, though. -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-L. wrote:
> Nancree wrote: > >>"Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly > > less than > >>the actual measure." >> > > > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their > food has to be some of the worst on the market. > > I have never measured anything while cooking - learned to cook by eye > (at about age 11) and have done so ever since. I do sometimes measure > when baking, if it isn't something I make often. I don't bake a lot, > though. > > -L. > Well la de da for you. It does provide a definition for "scant," something I did not see you put up. Or did I miss your post? jim |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancree wrote:
> "Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly > less than the actual measure." > > http://www.hormel.com/templates/know...temid=7&hlite= > true&id=584&querytext=Measuring > > Nancree Yep, a scant cup means slightly less than 8 oz. My grandmothers didn't measure things exactly and, in fact, often said "fill your palm" for a measure of salt or baking soda. Grandma Mac's recipes often called for "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs. butter. Gotta learn to translate ![]() Jill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"-L." > wrote in message
oups.com... > > Nancree wrote: >> "Scant - A scant measurement indicates that you should use slightly > less than >> the actual measure." >> > > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their > food has to be some of the worst on the market. > > I have never measured anything while cooking - learned to cook by eye > (at about age 11) and have done so ever since. I do sometimes measure > when baking, if it isn't something I make often. I don't bake a lot, > though. > > -L. > You *do* measure - with your eye! Sometimes the best way. -- Peter Aitken Remove the crap from my email address before using. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() JimLane wrote: > > Well la de da for you. It does provide a definition for "scant," > something I did not see you put up. Or did I miss your post? > > > jim Do you really need a definition for "scant"? Isn't is self-explanatory? -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> Yep, a scant cup means slightly less than 8 oz. My grandmothers didn't > measure things exactly and, in fact, often said "fill your palm" for a > measure of salt or baking soda. Grandma Mac's recipes often called for > "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs. butter. > Gotta learn to translate ![]() I recall reading in The Joy of Cooking that they conciously got rid of all the "scant" and "heaping" type measurement directions in favor of precise ones. That sometimes led to rather odd ones like, "one cup flour minus one tablespoon" and such. Brian |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Default User wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: > >> Yep, a scant cup means slightly less than 8 oz. My grandmothers >> didn't measure things exactly and, in fact, often said "fill your >> palm" for a measure of salt or baking soda. Grandma Mac's recipes >> often called for "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant >> about 2 Tbs. butter. Gotta learn to translate ![]() > > > I recall reading in The Joy of Cooking that they conciously got rid of > all the "scant" and "heaping" type measurement directions in favor of > precise ones. That sometimes led to rather odd ones like, "one cup > flour minus one tablespoon" and such. > > Brian That's kind of silly, but I've seen those measurement reductions myself. I'm pretty sure my grandmothers didn't have any cookbooks - at least, I never saw one in either of their homes. I rarely measure anything unless I'm making rice or bread. Jill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -L. wrote: > > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their > food has to be some of the worst on the market. How little you know. Hormel ain't just Spam, not that Spam is an awful product, I happen to enjoy it occasionaly and it's the national food of Hawaii. But if were to go to hormel.com and click on Products you'd see a wide variety, many of which are represntitive of the best in the world, to wit Hormel Di Lusso Genoa Salami (no other even comes close) and Hormel La Rosa Pepperoni is nonpareil. Btw, "scant" defines your IQ. scant a : barely or scarcely sufficient; especially : not quite coming up to a stated measure b : lacking in amplitude or quantity --- Sheldon |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() -L. wrote: > > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their > food has to be some of the worst on the market. How little you know. Hormael ain't jsut Spam, not that's it's awful, I happen to like it occasionally and it's the national food of Hawaii. If one goes to the Hormel.com web site adn click on products they'd see a wide array, many of which set a standard for the best in the world, to wit: Di Lusso Genoa Salami, La Rosa pepperoni, etal. Btw, "scant" defines your [culinary] IQ. scant a : barely or scarcely sufficient; especially : not quite coming up to a stated measure b : lacking in amplitude or quantity --- Sheldon |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jmcquown wrote: > [snip] I rarely measure anything unless > I'm making rice or bread. > > Jill To simplify measuring for rice, you can keep your rice in a canister and use a plastic measure as the scoop (mine's =BD Cup, which I will fill 3 or 4 times.) That takes care of the rice part. Then the next time you've measured in the water, put your finger down in the water to touch the top of the rice. Note the height of the water: for example, in the pot I always use for the quantity I usually make, the water rises to just above the first knuckle. That's all you need from then on. Saves getting out a measuring cup each time. As to other measurements, recipes are just a guide aren't they? If I know my baking powder or my dried herbs are a little old, I'll use a little more. If the wine is particularly flavorful I'll use a little more (in both the pot and the glass), and if the coffee roast is really dark I'll use a little less. -aem |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() jmcquown wrote: <SNIP> Grandma Mac's recipes often called for > "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs. butter. > Gotta learn to translate ![]() > > Jill My gramma's recipes called for the same amount of butter. But my favorite was one of her cookie recipes which called for "6 to 8 gurgles of molasses"! Scrooge |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sheldon wrote: > -L. wrote: > > > > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their > > food has to be some of the worst on the market. > > How little you know. Hormel ain't just Spam, not that Spam is an awful > product, I happen to enjoy it occasionaly and it's the national food of > Hawaii. Just bought some...hmmm...Spam sammiches for din - din tonight sounds pretty good I think... -- Best Greg |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
scrooge wrote:
> jmcquown wrote: > <SNIP> > Grandma Mac's recipes often called for >> "butter the size of a walnut" which basically meant about 2 Tbs. >> butter. Gotta learn to translate ![]() >> >> Jill > > My gramma's recipes called for the same amount of butter. But my > favorite was one of her cookie recipes which called for "6 to 8 > gurgles of molasses"! > > Scrooge ROFL! Well, yeah, it does "gurgle" when you pour it ![]() Jill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:06:33 -0600, "jmcquown" >
wrote: >scrooge wrote: >> >> My gramma's recipes called for the same amount of butter. But my >> favorite was one of her cookie recipes which called for "6 to 8 >> gurgles of molasses"! >> >> Scrooge > >ROFL! Well, yeah, it does "gurgle" when you pour it ![]() My mom used "glugs." Carol -- "Years ago my mother used to say to me... She'd say, 'In this world Elwood, you must be oh-so smart or oh-so pleasant.' Well, for years I was smart.... I recommend pleasant. You may quote me." *James Stewart* in the 1950 movie, _Harvey_ |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sheldon wrote: > -L. wrote: > > > > Well, duh! Does anyone really want cooking tips from HORMEL? Their > > food has to be some of the worst on the market. > > How little you know. Hormel ain't just Spam, not that Spam is an awful > product, I happen to enjoy it occasionaly Why could one "enjoy" an "awful" product? and it's the national food of > Hawaii. But if were to go to hormel.com and click on Products you'd > see a wide variety, many of which are represntitive of the best in the > world, to wit Hormel Di Lusso Genoa Salami (no other even comes close) > and Hormel La Rosa Pepperoni is nonpareil. We don't eat that stuff. Heart attack in a stick. Not to mention Hormel's OSHA and Union violations. > > Btw, "scant" defines your IQ. As always, you're so nice, Sheldon. -L. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-L. wrote:
> JimLane wrote: >> >> Well la de da for you. It does provide a definition for >> "scant," something I did not see you put up. Or did I >> miss your post? >> >> >> jim > > Do you really need a definition for "scant"? Isn't is > self-explanatory? > > -L. Ummm? There was a discussion in another thread with people asking what the definition was. No one actually knew, and several people asked. Maybe that's why Jim asked if he missed your post? Maybe you were practicing your measuring techniques and missed the thread? BOB |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BOB wrote: > Ummm? > There was a discussion in another thread with people asking what the > definition was. No one actually knew, and several people asked. Oh, ok. I missed that one! You mean I actually knew something some others didn't? LOL...I wasn't tryingto be a PITA - I seriously thought it was self-explanatory. > > Maybe that's why Jim asked if he missed your post? > > Maybe you were practicing your measuring techniques and missed the thread? Actually I was. I cooked a whole spread yesterday - roasted ham, turkey, mashed potatoes, turkey gravy, dressing, broccoli, and buttermilk biscuits. That was on top of the cuke/tomato/green salad I made for lunch. ![]() -L. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dinner (including some prep) 6/16/15 | General Cooking | |||
Wilderness survival techniques and tips | General Cooking | |||
Wilderness survival techniques and tips | General Cooking | |||
Wilderness survival techniques and tips | General Cooking | |||
Wilderness survival techniques and tips | General Cooking |