Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am planning to buy some cookware this weekend.
I want to buy big pans that I can use to make curries, stir fries etc. I thought I want calphalon ideally, since the food does not stick and need less oil to fry. (ofcourse it is expensive) But I see lot of people using thick steel bottom (esp TV cooking) any advice on why one is better than other. Thanks! |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Toddlers_mom wrote:
> I am planning to buy some cookware this weekend. > I want to buy big pans that I can use to make curries, stir fries etc. > I thought I want calphalon ideally, since the food does not stick and > need less oil to fry. (ofcourse it is expensive) > But I see lot of people using thick steel bottom (esp TV cooking) > any advice on why one is better than other. > Thanks! > I eliminated all non stick pans in preferrence for stainless steel and cast iron. I'm quite happy with that decision. It works for me. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.food.cooking, Toddlers_mom > wrote:
> I am planning to buy some cookware this weekend. > I want to buy big pans that I can use to make curries, stir fries etc. > I thought I want calphalon ideally, since the food does not stick and > need less oil to fry. (ofcourse it is expensive) > But I see lot of people using thick steel bottom (esp TV cooking) > any advice on why one is better than other. > Thanks! Thick steel bottoms would make no sense at all. Steel is a mediocre conductor of heat. Likely what you are seeing is a thick aluminum bottom, plated with steel. I got a bunch of discontinued Calphalon on Amazon for cheap. Real cheap. So far, I like it. It is good for many cooking tasks. It is not the only cookware I use, but for many, many things, it works better than anything else I have. -- In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. -- Dwight David Eisenhower |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a few sets of cookware. I have thick bottomed stainless steel
with non stick for cooking some things. The so called TV cook ware hawked by HSN.com. I find it very good for most things. Its called Ultrex. But its not good if you want to carmelize and saute. For this I have wolfgang puck's saute pans made from stainless. I got my 2 pans for a song at TJ Maxx. They have glass lids, which I like. Then I have a few TFal pans I use for omelets. I throw these out every few years or so and get new if they start looking beat up. They do make very good omelets and there is a small size for just one person. I also have an ancient set of stainless steel Farberware that is over 25 yrs old that I use. It has a copper bottom wafered between aluminum but the insides and sides are stainless. It works well too. It occurs to me that one kind of cookware does not meet all needs. I prefer a stainless non stick with a heavy bottom for every day and then augment with other pieces as needed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
86% off Save $542 on this incredible Calphalon cookware deal | Vegan | |||
Save $510 - 83% off on Calphalon Cookware! Only $104 shipped. | General Cooking | |||
Save $510 - 83% off on Calphalon Cookware! Only $104 shipped. | General Cooking | |||
Calphalon Hard-Anodized vs Non-stick Calphalon | Cooking Equipment | |||
Calphalon Pro non-stick ii vs commercial non-stick? | Cooking Equipment |