Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zxcvbob wrote:
> > Donna Rose wrote: > > Now I'm really confused. Are you saying that merely writing the word > > "God" is considered taking the name in vain? > > It could be. The name is so highly regarded that even writing it out might > not be respectful enough. I think if one believes that to be true, then playing little - games is disrespectful. If you aren't supposed to type out the word God, then don't. We can tell when one says G-d, you mean God. nancy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote: > >>Donna Rose wrote: > > >>>Now I'm really confused. Are you saying that merely writing the word >>>"God" is considered taking the name in vain? >> >>It could be. The name is so highly regarded that even writing it out might >>not be respectful enough. > > > I think if one believes that to be true, then playing little - games > is disrespectful. If you aren't supposed to type out the word God, > then don't. We can tell when one says G-d, you mean God. > > nancy I agree with you. I was just trying to anwer the question. Best regards, :-) Bob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boron Elgar wrote:
> >> Seems like everyone today adds an adjective to the word Judaism and it >> magically becomes authentic because it is the American way to say 'who >> are we to judge these things' therefore they are all equal etc. etc. >> I'm waiting for Budhist Judaism to be invented. > That would be the Essenes. One of the Jewish sects during the time of Christ. The folks carrying on the name Essenes today are a mishmash of Budhism, Christianity, Judaism, and I-dont-know-what-all. Seriously, Bob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zxcvbob wrote:
> > Nancy Young wrote: > > I think if one believes that to be true, then playing little - games > > is disrespectful. If you aren't supposed to type out the word God, > > then don't. We can tell when one says G-d, you mean God. > I agree with you. I was just trying to anwer the question. Oh no! I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. I was commenting on the whole issue. Didn't mean to seem as though I was arguing with you. nancy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
zxcvbob > wrote: > It could be. The name is so highly regarded that even writing it out might > not be respectful enough. My understanding of the issue is not in writing it out, but in the subsequent disposal. That is, if it's written out then later crumpled out and tossed into the garbage, THAT would be disrespectful. -- to respond, change "spamless.invalid" with "optonline.net" please mail OT responses only |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote: > >>Nancy Young wrote: > > >>>I think if one believes that to be true, then playing little - games >>>is disrespectful. If you aren't supposed to type out the word God, >>>then don't. We can tell when one says G-d, you mean God. > > >>I agree with you. I was just trying to anwer the question. > > > Oh no! I'm sorry, I didn't mean to offend you. I was commenting on > the whole issue. Didn't mean to seem as though I was arguing with > you. > > nancy You should know by know that I'm not that easily offended. (Did I forget to put a smiley face in my previous message? I'm sorry...) BTW, a troller started a thread in rec.gardens that has morphed into being about vicarious offendedness and has been actually kind of interesting. Best regards, :-) Bob |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
zxcvbob wrote:
> BTW, a troller started a thread in rec.gardens that has morphed into > being about vicarious offendedness and has been actually kind of > interesting. What's the subject line? I'll have a look. --Lia |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julia Altshuler wrote:
> zxcvbob wrote: > >> BTW, a troller started a thread in rec.gardens that has morphed into >> being about vicarious offendedness and has been actually kind of >> interesting. > > > > What's the subject line? I'll have a look. > --Lia > "Kaffir Lily is an offensive name" Best regards, Bob -- "Captain, I cannot believe my ears" --Spock |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Sheryl Rosen > wrote: > Actually, I think it would be a nice flavoring for a matzo kugel that will > serve as breakfast for several mornings. I'm thinking about soaking some > matzo as for matzo brie, then layering it with the leftover haroset and > pouring beaten eggs over the top. Do this all in a 9x9 square pan. Now *that* is an interesting idea. I never seem to have enough haroset each year. I'll break out the old hochmesser again and make a ton of it. I still use the traditional recipe--apple, walnuts, Concord grape wine (so sweet, I never think it needs any added sugar), bit of cinnamon. -- to respond, change "spamless.invalid" with "optonline.net" please mail OT responses only |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:05:42 -0500, zxcvbob >
wrote: >Nancy Young wrote: > >> zxcvbob wrote: >> >>>Donna Rose wrote: >> >> >>>>Now I'm really confused. Are you saying that merely writing the word >>>>"God" is considered taking the name in vain? >>> >>>It could be. The name is so highly regarded that even writing it out might >>>not be respectful enough. >> >> >> I think if one believes that to be true, then playing little - games >> is disrespectful. If you aren't supposed to type out the word God, >> then don't. We can tell when one says G-d, you mean God. >> >> nancy > > >I agree with you. I was just trying to anwer the question. > >Best regards, :-) >Bob but names in general have always had mystical significance your pal, blake. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passover recipes | General Cooking | |||
Passover Recipes? | Diabetic | |||
Passover recipes | General Cooking | |||
Passover Recipes | General Cooking | |||
Haroset: Was I need new Passover recipes | General Cooking |