Shaun aRe wrote:
> "Jack Masters" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>Bob (this one) wrote:
>>
>>>Jack Masters wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Shaun aRe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"There is no spoon."
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Use your imagination. Assume there is a spoon, and the rest of the
>>>>proof follows by induction.
>
>
> Liar.
>
>
>>>But if the spoon is in a closed box with a cat and a tree falls in the
>>>hurricane...
>>>
>>>I mean you must see the problem.
>
>
> Then you would likely need a new spoon. And cat. And box... And tree...
>
>
>>>Pastorio
>>
>>Well, _does_ the mere act of tasting change the flavour of the sauce
>>(indepent on the clean/used-state of the spoon) ?
>
>
> But of course it does you FOOL! Sheesh....
>
>
>
> Shaun aRe
> --
> Life is the dream you wake up to.
>
>

How can you know if you haven't tasted it yet?

zxcvbob wrote:

> Bob (this one) wrote:
>
>> Jack Masters wrote:
>>
>>> Bob (this one) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jack Masters wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shaun aRe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "There is no spoon."
>>>>>>
>>>>> Use your imagination. Assume there is a spoon, and the rest of the
>>>>> proof follows by induction.
>>>>>
>>>> But if the spoon is in a closed box with a cat and a tree falls in
>>>> the hurricane...
>>>>
>>>> I mean you must see the problem.
>>>
>>> Well, _does_ the mere act of tasting change the flavour of the sauce
>>> (indepent on the clean/used-state of the spoon) ?
>>
>> Well, some of my physicist friends say yes and some of my chef friends
>> say no. I always agree with my friends.
>>
>> Pastorio (absolutely)
>
> Werner Heisenberg must have been a close personal friend of yours.

Might have been. Not certain after all these years...

Pastorio

cathy wrote:
> Shaun aRe wrote:
>
>> "Jack Masters" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> Bob (this one) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jack Masters wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Shaun aRe wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "There is no spoon."
>>>>>>
>>>>> Use your imagination. Assume there is a spoon, and the rest of the
>>>>> proof follows by induction.
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>>>> But if the spoon is in a closed box with a cat and a tree falls in the
>>>> hurricane...
>>>>
>>>> I mean you must see the problem.
>>
>> Then you would likely need a new spoon. And cat. And box... And tree...
>>
>>>> Pastorio
>>>
>>> Well, _does_ the mere act of tasting change the flavour of the sauce
>>> (indepent on the clean/used-state of the spoon) ?
>>
>> But of course it does you FOOL! Sheesh....
>> Life is the dream you wake up to.
>>
> How can you know if you haven't tasted it yet?

Cause it was in the box and it was both tasted and untasted. I can just
remember what it tasted like without ever opening the box. Or not.

Easy.

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:
> cathy wrote:
>
>> Shaun aRe wrote:
>>
>>> "Jack Masters" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Bob (this one) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jack Masters wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Shaun aRe wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "There is no spoon."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Use your imagination. Assume there is a spoon, and the rest of the
>>>>>> proof follows by induction.
>>>
>>>
>>> Liar.
>>>
>>>>> But if the spoon is in a closed box with a cat and a tree falls in the
>>>>> hurricane...
>>>>>
>>>>> I mean you must see the problem.
>>>
>>>
>>> Then you would likely need a new spoon. And cat. And box... And tree...
>>>
>>>>> Pastorio
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well, _does_ the mere act of tasting change the flavour of the sauce
>>>> (indepent on the clean/used-state of the spoon) ?
>>>
>>>
>>> But of course it does you FOOL! Sheesh....
>>> Life is the dream you wake up to.
>>>
>> How can you know if you haven't tasted it yet?
>
>
> Cause it was in the box and it was both tasted and untasted. I can just
> remember what it tasted like without ever opening the box. Or not.
>
> Easy.
>
> Pastorio

I See. Tasting out of the box.

J.

Jack Masters wrote on 05 May 2005 in rec.food.cooking

> Bob (this one) wrote:
> > cathy wrote:
> >
> >> Shaun aRe wrote:
> >>
> >>> "Jack Masters" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>> Bob (this one) wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Jack Masters wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Shaun aRe wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> "There is no spoon."
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> Use your imagination. Assume there is a spoon, and the rest
> >>>>>> of the proof follows by induction.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Liar.
> >>>
> >>>>> But if the spoon is in a closed box with a cat and a tree
> >>>>> falls in the hurricane...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I mean you must see the problem.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Then you would likely need a new spoon. And cat. And box...
> >>> And tree...
> >>>
> >>>>> Pastorio
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Well, _does_ the mere act of tasting change the flavour of
> >>>> the sauce (indepent on the clean/used-state of the spoon) ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> But of course it does you FOOL! Sheesh....
> >>> Life is the dream you wake up to.
> >>>
> >> How can you know if you haven't tasted it yet?
> >
> >
> > Cause it was in the box and it was both tasted and untasted. I
> > can just remember what it tasted like without ever opening the
> > box. Or not.
> >
> > Easy.
> >
> > Pastorio
>
> I See. Tasting out of the box.
>
> J.
>

You forgot 1 important piece of Datum...The maiden Name of the Cat
Owner's Maiden Aunt.

--
No Bread Crumbs were hurt in the making of this Meal.
Type 2 Diabetic Since Aug 2004
1AC- 7.2, 7.3, 5.5, 5.6 mmol
Weight from 265 down to 219 lbs. and dropping.
Continuing to be Manitoban

"cathy" > wrote in message
...
> Shaun aRe wrote:
> > "Jack Masters" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>Bob (this one) wrote:
> >>
> >>>Jack Masters wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Shaun aRe wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>"There is no spoon."
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Use your imagination. Assume there is a spoon, and the rest of the
> >>>>proof follows by induction.
> >
> >
> > Liar.
> >
> >
> >>>But if the spoon is in a closed box with a cat and a tree falls in the
> >>>hurricane...
> >>>
> >>>I mean you must see the problem.
> >
> >
> > Then you would likely need a new spoon. And cat. And box... And tree...
> >
> >
> >>>Pastorio
> >>
> >>Well, _does_ the mere act of tasting change the flavour of the sauce
> >>(indepent on the clean/used-state of the spoon) ?
> >
> >
> > But of course it does you FOOL! Sheesh....
> >
> >
> >
> > Shaun aRe
> > --
> > Life is the dream you wake up to.
> >
> >
>
> How can you know if you haven't tasted it yet?

Omniscience me dear - you should try it ',;~}~



Shaun aRe

Monsur Fromage du Pollet wrote:
>
> You forgot 1 important piece of Datum...The maiden Name of the Cat
> Owner's Maiden Aunt.
>
Schrodinger had an aunt?

aem wrote on 05 May 2005 in rec.food.cooking

>
> Monsur Fromage du Pollet wrote:
> >
> > You forgot 1 important piece of Datum...The maiden Name of the Cat
> > Owner's Maiden Aunt.
> >
> Schrodinger had an aunt?
>
>

Who do you think loaned him the Cat in the first place? He wouldn't
really do that box thingy to his own cat. Proof that the cat is living
is proportional in that it was seen alive when put in the box. I too
can tell fairy tales. (I want string theory!) String theory ties up all
the loose ends...(possibly a pun)

--
No Bread Crumbs were hurt in the making of this Meal.
Type 2 Diabetic Since Aug 2004
1AC- 7.2, 7.3, 5.5, 5.6 mmol
Weight from 265 down to 219 lbs. and dropping.
Continuing to be Manitoban

Monsur Fromage du Pollet wrote:
> [snip]
(I want string theory!) String theory ties up all
> the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>
I was already lost early in quantum theory. String theory leaves me
all at loose ends.

On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> wrote:
String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)

Nope, frayed knot.

storm clouds wrote:

> On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> > wrote:
> String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>
> Nope, frayed knot.

String theory?

Gee.

Well, if you must...

Pastorio

In article >,
"Bob (this one)" > wrote:

> storm clouds wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> > > wrote:
> > String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
> >
> > Nope, frayed knot.
>
> String theory?
>
> Gee.
>
> Well, if you must...
>
> Pastorio

I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
--
K.

Sprout the MungBean to reply

"I don't like to commit myself about heaven and hell‹you
see, I have friends in both places." --Mark Twain

Katra wrote:
> In article >,
> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>
>
>>storm clouds wrote:
>>
>>
>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> wrote:
>>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>>>
>>>Nope, frayed knot.
>>
>>String theory?
>>
>>Gee.
>>
>>Well, if you must...
>>
>>Pastorio
>
>
> I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D

Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42

J.

In article >,
Jack Masters > wrote:

> Katra wrote:
> > In article >,
> > "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>storm clouds wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> > wrote:
> >>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
> >>>
> >>>Nope, frayed knot.
> >>
> >>String theory?
> >>
> >>Gee.
> >>
> >>Well, if you must...
> >>
> >>Pastorio
> >
> >
> > I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
>
> Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
>
> J.

Ahhhh, the meaning of life, the universe and everything!
Hitchikers guide to the Galaxy.
--
K.

Sprout the MungBean to reply

"I don't like to commit myself about heaven and hell‹you
see, I have friends in both places." --Mark Twain

"Monsur Fromage du Pollet" > wrote in message
...
> aem wrote on 05 May 2005 in rec.food.cooking
>
> >
> > Monsur Fromage du Pollet wrote:
> > >
> > > You forgot 1 important piece of Datum...The maiden Name of the Cat
> > > Owner's Maiden Aunt.
> > >
> > Schrodinger had an aunt?
> >
> >
>
> Who do you think loaned him the Cat in the first place? He wouldn't
> really do that box thingy to his own cat. Proof that the cat is living
> is proportional in that it was seen alive when put in the box.

But if a man makes a mistake, and there isn't a woman around to see it, is
he still wrong?



Shaun aRe

Jack Masters wrote:
> Katra wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>>
>>
>>> storm clouds wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>>>>
>>>> Nope, frayed knot.
>>>
>>> String theory?
>>>
>>> Gee.
>>>
>>> Well, if you must...
>>>
>>> Pastorio
>>
>> I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
>
> Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42

Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
wordplay "frayed knot."

Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."

If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
42, depending on what sizing system you use.

<clap, clap> work with me here, people...

Pastorio

Bob (this one) wrote:
> Jack Masters wrote:
>
>> Katra wrote:
>>
>>> In article >,
>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> storm clouds wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>>>>>
>>>>> Nope, frayed knot.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> String theory?
>>>>
>>>> Gee.
>>>>
>>>> Well, if you must...
>>>>
>>>> Pastorio
>>>
>>>
>>> I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
>>
>>
>> Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
>
>
> Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
> people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
> on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
> wordplay "frayed knot."
>
> Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
> it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
>
> If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
> 42, depending on what sizing system you use.
>
> <clap, clap> work with me here, people...
>
> Pastorio


"Aire on a G string"? (J.S. Bach)

Best regards,
Bob

In article >,
"Bob (this one)" > wrote:

> Jack Masters wrote:
> > Katra wrote:
> >
> >> In article >,
> >> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> storm clouds wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>> String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
> >>>>
> >>>> Nope, frayed knot.
> >>>
> >>> String theory?
> >>>
> >>> Gee.
> >>>
> >>> Well, if you must...
> >>>
> >>> Pastorio
> >>
> >> I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
> >
> > Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
>
> Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
> people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
> on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
> wordplay "frayed knot."
>
> Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
> it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
>
> If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
> 42, depending on what sizing system you use.
>
> <clap, clap> work with me here, people...
>
> Pastorio

I caught the "frayed knot" but was knot sure what to do with it...

unless you were hoping that the gee string was frayed?

<snicker>

A size 42 gee string might not be that appealing?
'twould be quite chaotic.
--
K.

Sprout the MungBean to reply

"I don't like to commit myself about heaven and hell‹you
see, I have friends in both places." --Mark Twain

Katra wrote:
> In article >,
> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>
>
>>Jack Masters wrote:
>>
>>>Katra wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>In article >,
>>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>storm clouds wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> wrote:
>>>>>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nope, frayed knot.
>>>>>
>>>>>String theory?
>>>>>
>>>>>Gee.
>>>>>
>>>>>Well, if you must...
>>>>>
>>>>>Pastorio
>>>>
>>>>I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
>>>
>>>Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
>>
>>Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
>>people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
>>on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
>>wordplay "frayed knot."
>>
>>Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
>>it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
>>
>>If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
>>42, depending on what sizing system you use.
>>
>><clap, clap> work with me here, people...
>>
>>Pastorio
>
>
> I caught the "frayed knot" but was knot sure what to do with it...
>
> unless you were hoping that the gee string was frayed?
>
> <snicker>
>
> A size 42 gee string might not be that appealing?
> 'twould be quite chaotic.

Who said it was the size of the gee string?

In article >,
Jack Masters > wrote:

> Katra wrote:
> > In article >,
> > "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Jack Masters wrote:
> >>
> >>>Katra wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>In article >,
> >>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>storm clouds wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> > wrote:
> >>>>>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>Nope, frayed knot.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>String theory?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Gee.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Well, if you must...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Pastorio
> >>>>
> >>>>I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
> >>>
> >>>Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
> >>
> >>Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
> >>people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
> >>on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
> >>wordplay "frayed knot."
> >>
> >>Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
> >>it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
> >>
> >>If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
> >>42, depending on what sizing system you use.
> >>
> >><clap, clap> work with me here, people...
> >>
> >>Pastorio
> >
> >
> > I caught the "frayed knot" but was knot sure what to do with it...
> >
> > unless you were hoping that the gee string was frayed?
> >
> > <snicker>
> >
> > A size 42 gee string might not be that appealing?
> > 'twould be quite chaotic.
>
> Who said it was the size of the gee string?

So it is the size of??????????
--
K.

Sprout the MungBean to reply

"I don't like to commit myself about heaven and hell‹you
see, I have friends in both places." --Mark Twain

Katra wrote:
> In article >,
> Jack Masters > wrote:
>
>
>>Katra wrote:
>>
>>>In article >,
>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Jack Masters wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Katra wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>In article >,
>>>>>>"Bob (this one)" > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>storm clouds wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> wrote:
>>>>>>>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nope, frayed knot.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>String theory?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Gee.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Well, if you must...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Pastorio
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
>>>>>
>>>>>Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
>>>>
>>>>Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
>>>>people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
>>>>on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
>>>>wordplay "frayed knot."
>>>>
>>>>Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
>>>>it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
>>>>
>>>>If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
>>>>42, depending on what sizing system you use.
>>>>
>>>><clap, clap> work with me here, people...
>>>>
>>>>Pastorio
>>>
>>>
>>>I caught the "frayed knot" but was knot sure what to do with it...
>>>
>>>unless you were hoping that the gee string was frayed?
>>>
>>><snicker>
>>>
>>>A size 42 gee string might not be that appealing?
>>>'twould be quite chaotic.
>>
>>Who said it was the size of the gee string?
>
>
> So it is the size of??????????

The carrot ? This group is about cooking, after all.

In article >,
Jack Masters > wrote:

> Katra wrote:
> > In article >,
> > Jack Masters > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Katra wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article >,
> >>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Jack Masters wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Katra wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>In article >,
> >>>>>>"Bob (this one)" > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>storm clouds wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Thu, 05 May 2005 22:52:18 GMT, Monsur Fromage du Pollet
> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>String theory ties up all the loose ends...(possibly a pun)
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Nope, frayed knot.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>String theory?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Gee.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Well, if you must...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Pastorio
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I prefer Chaos theory...... ;-D
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Whichever theory you use, it will be incomplete until it yields 42
> >>>>
> >>>>Let's back up a bit here and look at something obviously too subtle for
> >>>>people suffering from cooking fumes. Pay careful attention. This'll be
> >>>>on the final. The post to which I replied was a straight ahead, clever
> >>>>wordplay "frayed knot."
> >>>>
> >>>>Right below that, continuing wordplay, but into a different direction,
> >>>>it says "string theory." Next line says "Gee."
> >>>>
> >>>>If you shuffle them together, you get something else. And it could be
> >>>>42, depending on what sizing system you use.
> >>>>
> >>>><clap, clap> work with me here, people...
> >>>>
> >>>>Pastorio
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>I caught the "frayed knot" but was knot sure what to do with it...
> >>>
> >>>unless you were hoping that the gee string was frayed?
> >>>
> >>><snicker>
> >>>
> >>>A size 42 gee string might not be that appealing?
> >>>'twould be quite chaotic.
> >>
> >>Who said it was the size of the gee string?
> >
> >
> > So it is the size of??????????
>
> The carrot ? This group is about cooking, after all.
>

Hmmmmmm...
Carrots served with Calf Fries perhaps.
--
K.

Sprout the MungBean to reply

"I don't like to commit myself about heaven and hell‹you
see, I have friends in both places." --Mark Twain

> James Egan wrote:
>
>>While cooking something like spaghetti sauce, I taste the
>>sauce (or gravy) occasionally to test. My wife maintains
>>that I should clean the spoon each time, because my saliva
>>will adversely affect the sauce (or whatever). I understand
>>that saliva contains enzymes and that their purpose is to
>>break down food. However, I cannot believe that the trace
>>amount of saliva on a spoon used to test the sauce will
>>have any significantly adverse affect. It's not like I
>>slobber on the spoon! Anyway, do YOU always wash
>>your spoon after tasting? Be honest! <g>
>

Came to the conclusion (after 150 posts) that it MIGHT be Okay....