Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would
appreciate any an all input. Marc |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Marc wrote: > I don't want to spend a lot of money and would appreciate > any an all input. Get one with big tits. Sheldon |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc wrote:
> are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > appreciate any an all input. > > Marc Go to the library and find the Consumers Reports Buying Guide (or look through the magazines) They will tell you everything you need to know Goomba |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc wrote:
> are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > appreciate any an all input. > > Marc > > Water heating is a good feature. It lets you have your water heater set to a reasonable temperature, and the dishwasher will heat to about 140° as it runs. Best regards, BOb |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "zxcvbob" > wrote in message ... > Marc wrote: >> are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would >> appreciate any an all input. >> >> Marc >> A bunch of cycles is a waste. You need at most 3. rinse, wash, heavy duty wash. and quiet is important. > > > Water heating is a good feature. It lets you have your water heater set > to a reasonable temperature, and the dishwasher will heat to about 140° as > it runs. > > Best regards, > BOb |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/1/2005 2:47 PM or thereabouts, Marc appears, somewhat unbelievably,
to have opined: > are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > appreciate any an all input. > > Marc > > You want one that heats the water to kill germs (ahould be certified by NSF). Insulation aroung the tub is nice (makes it quieter. Timers and lots of extra cycles may be nice, but are definitely not necessary. I have a Whirlpool Gold (came with the new house). It works quite well and is VERY quiet. Dishwasher in the previous house would wake the dead ... it was a VERY CHEAP Roper. I think I paid about $170 for it and installed it myself to replace the 20 year old Kenmore in the last house. The Whirlpool is also Energy Star certified to use less energy than most dishwashers. I think the one I have is at the high end of Whirlpool's line with electronic touch controls and way too many cycles to choose from, but it was installed by the builder so I don't really know what it cost. -- I sent ten puns to all my friends hoping that at least one would make them laugh. Sadly, no pun in ten did. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Marc wrote: > are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > appreciate any an all input. I like my Maytag Jetclean EQ Plus... been using it since 12/03 and no complaints. Make sure to go the extra few bucks for the stainless steel interior. I bought mine at SEARS... cost like $500 total, w/delivery and set up. I strongly recommend you have their service tech come to your mome to install it... cost me all of $30, which also included taking away the old unit. Sheldon |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net>,
"Marc" > wrote: > are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > appreciate any an all input. Check the online edition of Consumer Reports. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't quite trust Consumers. I work in an industry that they do reviews
on the equipment and much of their informations, advice and reviews are IMHO bogus. Marc "Stan Horwitz" > wrote in message ... > In article . net>, > "Marc" > wrote: > > > are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > > appreciate any an all input. > > Check the online edition of Consumer Reports. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 01 May 2005 19:47:18 GMT, "Marc"
> wrote: >are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would >appreciate any an all input. We read consumer reports and chose one that was energy efficient and had good ratings for how well it worked. We bought a Bosch, It was around $450 and we love it. There's very little it doesn't get clean on the regular cycle and we haven't had anything come out dirty on the pot scrubber cycle. It's also very quiet and it ranked very high for energy efficiency. -- Siobhan Perricone "I ain't afraid of your Yahweh I ain't afraid of your Allah I ain't afraid of your Jesus I'm afraid of what ya do in the name of your god" - Holly Near |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Marc" > wrote: > >> are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would >> appreciate any an all input. FACT: Any dishwasher on the market today will get your dishes clean. Decide what is important to you. The higher priced models have more features, but often have better constructionl Stainless steel tubs instead of plastic. Higher price usually means better soundproofing. Some have a soft gfood grinder so you don't have to rinse. I'm not a fanatic about rinsing, but I don't put garbage into my DW intentionally so that is not a beg feature for me. We have a top of the line Kitchen Aid. My wife wanted that style. It seems well made, it has always cleaned the dishes, and is very quite. We always use the "normal" cycle and the "sani-wash". We looked at Bosch, Maytag, Whirlpool. The local dealer sell, but no longer stocks Bosch because of reliability problem. Maytag had a third shelf, but did not seem to be really practial in use. The KA had more features that we ever use, but looked better build and it is the one my wife liked for appearance. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net>,
"Marc" > wrote: > I don't quite trust Consumers. I work in an industry that they do reviews > on the equipment and much of their informations, advice and reviews are IMHO > bogus. Anyone familiar with statistics and survey methodology would find Consumer Reports' ratings suspect. They should be a _guide_ to purchasing and no more. Never consider or exclude a product just because CR "says so." sd |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One of the problems was that often much of what they reviewed was from the
previous model year and no longer available. They also hardly ever reviewed the good stuff and never the best stuff. Marc "sd" > wrote in message ... > In article . net>, > "Marc" > wrote: > > > I don't quite trust Consumers. I work in an industry that they do reviews > > on the equipment and much of their informations, advice and reviews are IMHO > > bogus. > > Anyone familiar with statistics and survey methodology would find > Consumer Reports' ratings suspect. They should be a _guide_ to > purchasing and no more. Never consider or exclude a product just > because CR "says so." > > sd |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Marc N_O-S_P_A_M wrote: > One of the problems was that often much of what they reviewed was from the > previous model year and no longer available. They also hardly ever reviewed > the good stuff and never the best stuff. Why do you care... you initially gave notice that one of your main criteria is that you "don't want to spend too much"... so don't even think about top of the line units ("good stuff/best stuff")... you seem to want it both ways, spend little but get the best. But naturally you're a fool, because major appliances, especially dishwashers typically get used very often and can easily last 10-15 years, so the price paid amortized over their useful life is but pennies a day, so you may as well have all the bells and whistles, especially since all operating costs (electric, water, soaps) are essentially the same regardless of model. The only time I'd recommend buying bottom of the barrel appliances is if you plan on moving within the next two years, or you live in a trailer, where the abode depreciates faster than its contents. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I live in a rent house!!! and appreciate the input but YOU did not read the
post you only reacted which is your way and one of the things we love about you. I was referring to why I don't believe in Consumers Guide as a reliable source of information. Marc "Sheldon" > wrote in message oups.com... > > Marc N_O-S_P_A_M wrote: > > One of the problems was that often much of what they reviewed was > from the > > previous model year and no longer available. They also hardly ever > reviewed > > the good stuff and never the best stuff. > > Why do you care... you initially gave notice that one of your main > criteria is that you "don't want to spend too much"... so don't even > think about top of the line units ("good stuff/best stuff")... you seem > to want it both ways, spend little but get the best. But naturally > you're a fool, because major appliances, especially dishwashers > typically get used very often and can easily last 10-15 years, so the > price paid amortized over their useful life is but pennies a day, so > you may as well have all the bells and whistles, especially since all > operating costs (electric, water, soaps) are essentially the same > regardless of model. The only time I'd recommend buying bottom of the > barrel appliances is if you plan on moving within the next two years, > or you live in a trailer, where the abode depreciates faster than its > contents. > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Marc wrote: > I live in a rent house!!! Bragging or complaining... > and appreciate the input but YOU did not read the > post you only reacted which is your way and one of the things we love about > you. I was referring to why I don't believe in Consumers Guide as a > reliable source of information. Which is why I began with "WHY THE **** DO YOU CARE". Anything you write in a previous post becomes part and parcel to any of your subsequent posts, even in other threads, even years later, so in the future be verrrry careful not to contradict yourself. And the fact you omit information from your posts is no ones responsibility but yours, so shut the **** up about how you live in a rental, you had your chance to profer that info in your original post. AND quit top posting, eh... you _NEWBIE_ DOUCHE BAG... Marc is just another DISHONEST smarmy slime bucket to deal with... he won't last long. > "Sheldon" wrote: > > > > Marc wrote: > > > One of the problems was that often much of what they reviewed was > > from the > > > previous model year and no longer available. They also hardly ever > > reviewed > > > the good stuff and never the best stuff. > > > > > > Why do you care... you initially gave notice that one of your main > > criteria is that you "don't want to spend too much"... so don't even > > think about top of the line units ("good stuff/best stuff")... you seem > > to want it both ways, spend little but get the best. But naturally > > you're a fool, because major appliances, especially dishwashers > > typically get used very often and can easily last 10-15 years, so the > > price paid amortized over their useful life is but pennies a day, so > > you may as well have all the bells and whistles, especially since all > > operating costs (electric, water, soaps) are essentially the same > > regardless of model. The only time I'd recommend buying bottom of the > > barrel appliances is if you plan on moving within the next two years, > > or you live in a trailer, where the abode depreciates faster than its > > contents. > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So eloquent. So you have a problem with change? Who said top posting is
wrong. Sheldon grow up. Not once did I contradict myself. Marc "Sheldon" > wrote in message ups.com... > > Marc wrote: > > I live in a rent house!!! > > Bragging or complaining... > > > and appreciate the input but YOU did not read the > > post you only reacted which is your way and one of the things we love > about > > you. I was referring to why I don't believe in Consumers Guide as a > > reliable source of information. > > Which is why I began with "WHY THE **** DO YOU CARE". Anything you > write in a previous post becomes part and parcel to any of your > subsequent posts, even in other threads, even years later, so in the > future be verrrry careful not to contradict yourself. And the fact you > omit information from your posts is no ones responsibility but yours, > so shut the **** up about how you live in a rental, you had your chance > to profer that info in your original post. > > AND quit top posting, eh... you _NEWBIE_ DOUCHE BAG... Marc is just > another DISHONEST smarmy slime bucket to deal with... he won't last > long. > > > "Sheldon" wrote: > > > > > > Marc wrote: > > > > One of the problems was that often much of what they reviewed was > > > from the > > > > previous model year and no longer available. They also hardly > ever > > > reviewed > > > > the good stuff and never the best stuff. > > > > > > > > > Why do you care... you initially gave notice that one of your main > > > criteria is that you "don't want to spend too much"... so don't > even > > > think about top of the line units ("good stuff/best stuff")... you > seem > > > to want it both ways, spend little but get the best. But naturally > > > you're a fool, because major appliances, especially dishwashers > > > typically get used very often and can easily last 10-15 years, so > the > > > price paid amortized over their useful life is but pennies a day, > so > > > you may as well have all the bells and whistles, especially since > all > > > operating costs (electric, water, soaps) are essentially the same > > > regardless of model. The only time I'd recommend buying bottom of > the > > > barrel appliances is if you plan on moving within the next two > years, > > > or you live in a trailer, where the abode depreciates faster than > its > > > contents. > > > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One time on Usenet, "Marc" > said:
> So eloquent. So you have a problem with change? Who said top posting is > wrong. <snip> Since the beginning of Usenet it's been held that top posting is bad form. It messes up the flow of the conversation and that's quite rude. So is not editing your follow-ups... -- Jani in WA ~ mom, vid gamer, novice cook ~ "The ships hung in the sky in much the same way that bricks don't" - D. Adams, HGTTG |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 May 2005 08:55:25 -0700, Sheldon wrote:
> > Marc N_O-S_P_A_M wrote: > > > One of the problems was that often much of what they reviewed was > > from the previous model year and no longer available. They also hardly ever > > reviewed the good stuff and never the best stuff. > > Why do you care... you initially gave notice that one of your main > criteria is that you "don't want to spend too much"... so don't even > think about top of the line units ("good stuff/best stuff")... you seem > to want it both ways, spend little but get the best. But naturally > you're a fool, because major appliances, especially dishwashers > typically get used very often and can easily last 10-15 years, so the > price paid amortized over their useful life is but pennies a day, so > you may as well have all the bells and whistles, especially since all > operating costs (electric, water, soaps) are essentially the same > regardless of model. We're starting to remodel our "basement", which leads directly out to the yard and one of the appliances we're installing is a diswasher. One of the contenders is an 18 inch Bosch - because we've had a full sized Bosch in the kitchen for several years and still love it. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3 May 2005 10:30:43 -0700, Sheldon wrote:
> AND quit top posting, eh... you _NEWBIE_ DOUCHE BAG... Marc is just > another DISHONEST smarmy slime bucket to deal with... he won't last > long. Hey. I top post often. Pfffft, to nay sayers. |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 03 May 2005 20:25:27 GMT, Gal Called Jani wrote:
> One time on Usenet, "Marc" > said: > > > So eloquent. So you have a problem with change? Who said top posting is > > wrong. > > <snip> > > Since the beginning of Usenet it's been held that top posting > is bad form. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Let's it's like claiming a bird is a dinosaur. > It messes up the flow of the conversation and that's > quite rude. So is not editing your follow-ups... The default setting on most mainstream news readers is for top posting, which should give you a BIG clue into what is normal and what is not these days. Times change and you haven't changed with them, so that makes you an official.... Old Fogie. ![]() |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc wrote:
> are worth the money. I don't want to spend a lot of money and would > appreciate any an all input. > > Marc Consumers Reports. Go to the library and find the buying guide or the issue that reviews them. I've never been steered wrong using them. Goomba |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How to clean up broken glass in a dish-washer | Cooking Equipment | |||
Vegetable Washer | General Cooking | |||
Gettting grapes from a 1-ton T-bin | Winemaking | |||
gettting used to my new knives | General Cooking | |||
What's the best bottle washer? | Winemaking |