Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:

Dear _____,

Thank you for your letter concerning our employee Michael Voight.

We are aware of the situation and have received numerous complaints about his
usenet posts from work.

We take abuse by our employees very seriously. While we do provide Internet
access to our employees, we expect them to behave professionally and not abuse
the privilege.

We have initiated an investigation into Mr. Voight's Internet activities. His
department manager and others concerned have been alerted about the situation,
and his Internet use is being monitored.

We appreciate the time you have taken to bring this to our attention and we
apologize for our employee's behavior. Rest assured we will do everything
possible to correct the situation.

--------------------------------------

Keep those complaints to Cisco coming, folks! It's working!

About Rogue Cisco Employee Michael "mrtravelkay" Voight,
a.k.a. the "mrtravel" Netkook Troll/Usenet Flooder

***WARNING: THIS IDIOT HAS BEEN CAUGHT FORGING PEOPLE'S IDENTITIES ON USENET
AND CANCELLING THEIR POSTS.***

"mrtavelkay" is the latest usenet handle of a brainless troll whose real name is
Michael Voight, email >.

He is better known by his previous stupid handle, "mrtravel".

The idiot works for Cisco in San Jose and apparently they don't
keep him busy enough so he has to troll usenet when he isn't
looking for foreign brides to marry in exchange for money
in alt.visa.us.marriage-based and alt.personals.big-folks, or trying
to pick up minors in alt.personals.teens or any of the number of creepy
newsgroups he frequents. Some of his other trolling aliases are Network
Guy, , sleepydoc >, jlhunt
>, and Lost 5 of 8 >, mrt >,
news.sf.sbcglobal.net >, not-nomen
>, David Tanner
>, Jeff Davies >, BobTheBuilder
>.

All intelligent members of the usenet community have killfiled him, so he takes
great pains to get past their killfiles by rubbing his only two cerebral neurons
together and coming up with gems like: mrtrav >, mrtrav3
>, mrraveltay >, and mrtravelkay
>, and mtravelkay > and <""a.a\"@a,a,a>.
The lastest product of his brain diarrhea is Bill Clarkj
>.

He seems to like to hang out in alt.sex.preteen. Hmmm....

His phone numbers are 831-295-3628 and 831-252-2606.

He's got a daughter in Orange County that one of his ex-wives had the
intelligence to take away from him. Lord only knows what could have
happened to her if she had continued to live with the kook. The other kids
he has belong to his previous Russian sleazy brides, and since they come
and go so do the kids. It wouldn't hurt to let Cisco know what kind of
deviant sexual pervert maniac they have working for them, so....

For starters, forward his idiotic posts to .

He works in technical support, so forward them to .

He often posts through sbcglobal and prodigy, so forward them to
and as well.

You can also call them at 1 800 553 2447 and ask to speak with a supervisor
and explain that you are EXTREMELY unhappy that this idiot spends his whole
day at work playing on the internet on company time. THEY WILL NOT LIKE
THAT.

Then write to corporate headquarters explaining what this idiot is doing
and telling them HOW BAD IT IS FOR THEIR COMPANY IMAGE. They will LOVE
that you brought this to their attention:

Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Dr.
San Jose, CA 95134
USA

Then also call them. You should always follow up email or letters with
phone calls. Always ask for supervisors or managers. Try to get as far up
as possible.

(408)526-4000
(800)553-NETS or
(800)553-6387

Contact Investor Relations and tell them you are interested in investing in
their company but won't do so until they get rid of this asshole who is
wasting company resources:

Cisco Systems, Inc.
Investor Relations Department
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134-1706
Phone: (408) 526-8890
Fax: (408) 526-4545
Email:

Might as well contact customer service too, they LOVE to hear about this
type of stuff:

USA 1 800 553 6387




Then finally, send letters with copies of his nasty posts addressed
personally to each one of the OFFICERS of the company using the
headquarters address. Believe me, they READ your complaints and are VERY
INTERESTED in them, especially if it's about one of their employees. They
will take a PERSONAL interest in rooting this ASSHOLE out of their company:

John Morgridge, Chairman
John Chambers, President, CEO
Donald Valentine, Vice Chairman
Larry Carter, CFO, Sr. VP-Fin. and Admin., Sec., Director
Richard Justice, Sr. VP, Worldwide Field Operations

Have fun!

Max Mustermann wrote:
> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:

Funny, Max posts from the same place as Nomen, and like Nomen, even
changes the subject line.

mtravelkay > wrote in :

> Max Mustermann wrote:
>> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:
>
> Funny, Max posts from the same place as Nomen, and like Nomen, even
> changes the subject line.
>
>

Nomen Nescio isn't a person, it's an anonymous remailer that trolls enjoy
using to post anonymously.

Some people know how to configure their headers to get a name in it, but if
the server doesn't get the command, it posts as Nomen Nescio.

Cross-posting moron.

"Max Mustermann" > wrote in message
age.info...
> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:
>
> Dear _____,
>
> Thank you for your letter concerning our employee Michael Voight.
>
> We are aware of the situation and have received numerous complaints about
his
> usenet posts from work.
>
> We take abuse by our employees very seriously. While we do provide
Internet
> access to our employees, we expect them to behave professionally and not
abuse
> the privilege.
>
> We have initiated an investigation into Mr. Voight's Internet activities.
His
> department manager and others concerned have been alerted about the
situation,
> and his Internet use is being monitored.
>
> We appreciate the time you have taken to bring this to our attention and
we
> apologize for our employee's behavior. Rest assured we will do everything
> possible to correct the situation.
>
> --------------------------------------
>
> Keep those complaints to Cisco coming, folks! It's working!
>
> About Rogue Cisco Employee Michael "mrtravelkay" Voight,
> a.k.a. the "mrtravel" Netkook Troll/Usenet Flooder
>
> ***WARNING: THIS IDIOT HAS BEEN CAUGHT FORGING PEOPLE'S IDENTITIES ON
USENET
> AND CANCELLING THEIR POSTS.***
>
> "mrtavelkay" is the latest usenet handle of a brainless troll whose real
name is
> Michael Voight, email >.
>
> He is better known by his previous stupid handle, "mrtravel".
>
> The idiot works for Cisco in San Jose and apparently they don't
> keep him busy enough so he has to troll usenet when he isn't
> looking for foreign brides to marry in exchange for money
> in alt.visa.us.marriage-based and alt.personals.big-folks, or trying
> to pick up minors in alt.personals.teens or any of the number of creepy
> newsgroups he frequents. Some of his other trolling aliases are Network
> Guy, , sleepydoc >,
jlhunt
> >, and Lost 5 of 8 >, mrt
>,
> news.sf.sbcglobal.net >, not-nomen
> >, David Tanner
> >, Jeff Davies >, BobTheBuilder
> >.
>
> All intelligent members of the usenet community have killfiled him, so he
takes
> great pains to get past their killfiles by rubbing his only two cerebral
neurons
> together and coming up with gems like: mrtrav >,
mrtrav3
> >, mrraveltay >, and mrtravelkay
> >, and mtravelkay > and <""a.a\"@a,a,a>.
> The lastest product of his brain diarrhea is Bill Clarkj
> >.
>
> He seems to like to hang out in alt.sex.preteen. Hmmm....
>
> His phone numbers are 831-295-3628 and 831-252-2606.
>
> He's got a daughter in Orange County that one of his ex-wives had the
> intelligence to take away from him. Lord only knows what could have
> happened to her if she had continued to live with the kook. The other
kids
> he has belong to his previous Russian sleazy brides, and since they come
> and go so do the kids. It wouldn't hurt to let Cisco know what kind of
> deviant sexual pervert maniac they have working for them, so....
>
> For starters, forward his idiotic posts to .
>
> He works in technical support, so forward them to .
>
> He often posts through sbcglobal and prodigy, so forward them to
> and as well.
>
> You can also call them at 1 800 553 2447 and ask to speak with a
supervisor
> and explain that you are EXTREMELY unhappy that this idiot spends his
whole
> day at work playing on the internet on company time. THEY WILL NOT LIKE
> THAT.
>
> Then write to corporate headquarters explaining what this idiot is doing
> and telling them HOW BAD IT IS FOR THEIR COMPANY IMAGE. They will LOVE
> that you brought this to their attention:
>
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> 170 West Tasman Dr.
> San Jose, CA 95134
> USA
>
> Then also call them. You should always follow up email or letters with
> phone calls. Always ask for supervisors or managers. Try to get as far
up
> as possible.
>
> (408)526-4000
> (800)553-NETS or
> (800)553-6387
>
> Contact Investor Relations and tell them you are interested in investing
in
> their company but won't do so until they get rid of this asshole who is
> wasting company resources:
>
> Cisco Systems, Inc.
> Investor Relations Department
> 170 West Tasman Drive
> San Jose, CA 95134-1706
> Phone: (408) 526-8890
> Fax: (408) 526-4545
> Email:
>
> Might as well contact customer service too, they LOVE to hear about this
> type of stuff:
>
> USA 1 800 553 6387
>
>
>
>
> Then finally, send letters with copies of his nasty posts addressed
> personally to each one of the OFFICERS of the company using the
> headquarters address. Believe me, they READ your complaints and are VERY
> INTERESTED in them, especially if it's about one of their employees. They
> will take a PERSONAL interest in rooting this ASSHOLE out of their
company:
>
> John Morgridge, Chairman
> John Chambers, President, CEO
> Donald Valentine, Vice Chairman
> Larry Carter, CFO, Sr. VP-Fin. and Admin., Sec., Director
> Richard Justice, Sr. VP, Worldwide Field Operations
>
> Have fun!
>

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:08:58 -0000, Dog3
<dognospam@adjfkdla;not> wrote:

> You also look like a Net Nanny wandering
> Usenet.

I hope you meant "look like you NEED a Net Nanny". If not,
I'm hopelessly confused about the meaning of the term.



Practice safe eating - always use condiments

"> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:
>
> Dear _____,
>
> Thank you for your letter concerning our employee Michael Voight.
>

<snip crap>

If your vendetta is valid against this guy, why do you try to hide your own
identity. Nobody takes a complaint seriously unless the complainent is
willing to identify him/herself. Can you imagine a court of law where
witness statements are made anonymously? So come on, if your gripe is real
identify yourself..

Paul H. wrote:

> Cross-posting moron.

And you are somehow more intelligent by including his 150 lines of tripe
only to state the obvious?
--
It's not hard to meet expenses, they're everywhere.

Paul H. wrote:
> Cross-posting moron.

Top-posting moron who does not trim posts.

--
John Gaughan
http://www.johngaughan.net/

> John Gaughan
>Newsgroups: rec.travel.air, alt.visa.us.marriage-based, rec.food.cooking,
>misc.consumers

John Gaughan is a crossposting NEWBIE piece of shit.


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 09:35:08 -0700, "Paul H."
> wrote:

>Cross-posting moron.
>
>"Max Mustermann" > wrote in message
sage.info...
>> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:
>>
Snip

Which kind of moron is worse? One who crossposts 150 lines of drivel,
or one who RE-CROSSPOSTS 150 lines of drivel only to add three words?

PENMART01 wrote:
> John Gaughan is a crossposting NEWBIE piece of shit.

Sheldon is a pig****ing NEWBIE piece of shit.

--
John Gaughan
http://www.johngaughan.net/

> John Gaughan sneers:
>
>PENMART01 wrote:
>> John Gaughan is a crossposting NEWBIE piece of shit.
>
>Sheldon is a pig****ing piece of shit.

Yup been ****ing your momma.


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

You people are all pathetic. All you're doing is continuing to waste the
time of all of us who come to this newsgroup for good advice. Thanks alot
for 3 minutes of useless information.

"freeda" > wrote in message
...
>
> "> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:
> >
> > Dear _____,
> >
> > Thank you for your letter concerning our employee Michael Voight.
> >
>
> <snip crap>
>
> If your vendetta is valid against this guy, why do you try to hide your
own
> identity. Nobody takes a complaint seriously unless the complainent is
> willing to identify him/herself. Can you imagine a court of law where
> witness statements are made anonymously? So come on, if your gripe is real
> identify yourself..
>
>

>"Ken Maritza"
>
>You people are all pathetic.
>
>Thanks alot for 3 minutes of useless information.

You're who's pathetic, you illiterate *******... "alot" is NOT a word... you
friggin' douche bag.


---= BOYCOTT FRENCH--GERMAN (belgium) =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
Sheldon
````````````
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."

Ken Maritza wrote:

> You people are all pathetic. All you're doing is continuing to waste
> the time of all of us who come to this newsgroup for good advice.
> Thanks alot for 3 minutes of useless information.

And what, praytell, compelled you to read this thread at all? Are we
really pathetic or aren't you really as pathetic for wasting your own
time by consciously deciding to read this thread in the first place?
(Pot, meet kettle, black, 'nuff said).

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 00:19:29 -0000, Dog3
<dognospam@adjfkdla;not> wrote:

> sf > poured a drink and posted
> :
>
> > On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:08:58 -0000, Dog3
> > <dognospam@adjfkdla;not> wrote:
> >
> >> You also look like a Net Nanny wandering
> >> Usenet.
> >
> > I hope you meant "look like you NEED a Net Nanny". If not,
> > I'm hopelessly confused about the meaning of the term.
> >
> >
> >
> > Practice safe eating - always use condiments
> >
>
> A net nanny is typically someone that is immature or someone that is so
> sensitive about any number of topics, they should never set a finger on
> usenet.

Hmmmm. The last time I looked Net Nanny was the name of a
parental control program. This is the first hit on Google:
http://www.netlingo.com/lookup.cfm?term=Net%20Nanny

> In this particular case, the troll apparently does not care for
> what the mark posts or where he/she posts it. The troll then proceeds to
> become, in stalker fashion, a net nanny that tries to get the mark censored
> by his/her ISP. It tries to humiliate the mark. When all else fails, the
> immature troll begins digging up and posting personal information about the
> mark in public forums. Sometimes this can become a serious issue in real
> life as well. I believe our coward hiding behind the remailer is a twisted
> individual hell bent on some type of revenge. Unfortunately for the
> remailer person, they believe they are safe and untraceable behind the
> remailer. This is a falsehood which gives these type of people a stupid
> sense of security.

Thanks for the explanation, but that person sounds more like
a net stalker than a troll to me. A nanny is a glorified
babysitter and I don't associate the idea of stalking with
"nanny".



Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:45:25 -0400, "Ken Maritza"
> wrote:

>You people are all pathetic. All you're doing is continuing to waste the
>time of all of us who come to this newsgroup for good advice. Thanks alot
>for 3 minutes of useless information.
>
>"freeda" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "> Excerpt from letter received from Cisco:
>> >
>> > Dear _____,
>> >
>> > Thank you for your letter concerning our employee Michael Voight.
>> >
>>
>> <snip crap>
>>
>> If your vendetta is valid against this guy, why do you try to hide your
>own
>> identity. Nobody takes a complaint seriously unless the complainent is
>> willing to identify him/herself. Can you imagine a court of law where
>> witness statements are made anonymously? So come on, if your gripe is real
>> identify yourself..
>>
>>
>
Why did you choose to waste three minutes on obvious crap? Why do you
blame others for poor choices you make?

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 12:54:01 -0000, Dog3
<dognospam@adjfkdla;not> wrote:

> sf > poured a drink and posted
> :
>
> >
> > Hmmmm. The last time I looked Net Nanny was the name of a
> > parental control program. This is the first hit on Google:
> > http://www.netlingo.com/lookup.cfm?term=Net%20Nanny
>
> I'm well aware of the software. I've been using Usenet since 1980 or
> before. Net Nanny is a phrase coined by the old timers to indicate a
> poster would like to censor another poster. The software was introduced
> many, many years after the phrase was being used.
>

Thanks for your perdigree, but you still haven't cleared up
my confusion about your choice of terms. Why are you
calling the person who should be censored and needs a net
nanny, a net nanny? I still don't get it.



Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:04:54 -0000, Dog3
<dognospam@adjfkdla;not> wrote:

> sf > poured a drink and posted
> :
>
> >
> > Thanks for your perdigree, but you still haven't cleared up
> > my confusion about your choice of terms.
>
> Pedigree? What an odd statement.

Oh for heaven's sake, Michael... look at your posting name:
Dog. Dogs have pedigrees (backgrounds) and you posted
yours.

> I'm sorry you do not understand the
> term. I'm not sure how else to explain it to you.

Never fear, you managed to make me understand at the end of
this post. >G<

>
> > Why are you
> > calling the person who should be censored and needs a net
> > nanny, a net nanny? I still don't get it.
>
> No one on Usenet can be censored be unless their ISP decides their TOS has
> been violated. The people posting that believe *they* should decide who
> should and should not be censored are the Net nannies.

So, net nannys are the the busybodys of usenet. I don't
think the idea of censorship is an issue for them, but full
control (submitting to their way of thinking) is. They are
like that dreaded relative or neighbor who sticks their nose
into everyone's business.

> There are plenty of
> them around and are a constant source of amusement to me. They are also
> extremely fun to toy with.
>
You have to get your kicks somewhere - so if it's not on
Route 66, then it will be on the information highway.

<I think you're old enough to understand that one>

LOL >W<



Practice safe eating - always use condiments

Top posting is good, if you are following reading a thread. Then you don't have to scroll past all
the old stuff to read the new.
If you start reading in the middle of a thread then you can scroll down and read all of the past
messages to catchup.

"Scott in Aztlán" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:45:25 -0400, "Ken Maritza" >
> wrote:
>
> >You people are all pathetic. All you're doing is continuing to waste the
> >time of all of us who come to this newsgroup for good advice. Thanks alot
> >for 3 minutes of useless information.
>
> Top-posting, whining, hypocrite moron.
>
> --
> Friends don't let friends shop at Best Buy.

Peanutjake wrote:

> Top posting is good, if you are following reading a thread.

Submitted by somebody who either can't form correct English sentences or
can't be bothered to proofread what he writes! :-)

What exactly is a "following reading" anyway? ;-)
--
What has four legs and an arm? A happy pit bull.

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 13:03:43 -0400, "Peanutjake"
> wrote:

>Top posting is good,

If you are a lazy Outhouse Express using f***wit.
--
Andrew. To email unscramble & remove spamtrap.
Help make Usenet a better place: English is read downwards,
please don't top post. Trim messages to quote only relevant text.
Check groups.google.com before asking a question.

Peanutjake wrote:
>
> Top posting is good, if you are following reading a thread. Then you don't have to scroll past all
> the old stuff to read the new.

This is probably true because you read a lot of articles posted by
inexperienced (or stupid) people who don't know how to trim their
replies

> If you start reading in the middle of a thread then you can scroll down and read all of the past
> messages to catchup.

It should be easy to catch up on the thread if the posting is properly
done but hardly anyone posting to usenet these days seems to care (or
doesn't know any better)

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 12:51:11 -0000, Dog3
<dognospam@adjfkdla;not> wrote:

> > You have to get your kicks somewhere - so if it's not on
> > Route 66, then it will be on the information highway.
> >
> > <I think you're old enough to understand that one>
> >
> > LOL >W<
>
> <G> Yes, I'm certainly old enough. Hey, speaking or route 66; Have you
> ever done that route 66 run?

No, I haven't... Isn't most of the original Route 66 buried
under freeways and other stuff now?

I was on parts of it as a kid when we drove from Michigan to
the "4 Corners" area in the Southwest for a vacation.
Haven't done it since.

But, when my mother divorced and drove out to California
with my infant brother, she followed most if not all of
Route 66. I remember that she wrote us a postcard from Boot
Hill, while she was giving Baby Brother (now in his 30's) a
bottle. We girls (teenagers at the time), flew to
California later - during our semester break. I became a
life long Californian, sister lives in Wisconsin,
mother/brother live in (mid-coastal) Oregon.

> There is an antique car club that does it
> annualy (sp). I don't know much about it. Good food along the way?

I have a model T, but it would need a "non" model T engine
and some good shock absorbers to lure me into doing that.
>S<


Practice safe eating - always use condiments

Is this not a food/cooking chat room?

> wrote in message
...
> Is this not a food/cooking chat room?
>
>

Nope.

Kathy

In article >, sf > wrote:

> No, I haven't... Isn't most of the original Route 66 buried
> under freeways and other stuff now?

Central in Albuquerque is Route 66. There are plenty of
good places to eat along there....

Mike Beede

In article >,
wrote:

> Is this not a food/cooking chat room?

Not quite. It's not a chat room. It's a newsgroup whose focus is
supposed to cookiing food. Topics drift quickly. :-/
--
-Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> updated 3-29-04.

In rec.food.cooking, wrote:
> Is this not a food/cooking chat room?

No.



--
....I'm an air-conditioned gypsy...

- The Who

"Melba's Jammin'" > wrote in message
...
> In article >,
> wrote:
>
> > Is this not a food/cooking chat room?
>
> Not quite. It's not a chat room. It's a newsgroup whose focus is
> supposed to cookiing food. Topics drift quickly. :-/
> --
> -Barb, <www.jamlady.eboard.com> updated 3-29-04.

This one is drifting around and around the bowl waiting for someone else to
hit the handle and reflush.
-Ginny