What happened to your brilliant exposition about human nutrition and
metabolic functions? I really expected you to post lots of references
and documentation of your deep understanding of the subject, nearly.

I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily available
should take pity on the less informed and just offer the huddled
masses the benefit of that superior grasp of it all. You know, to
raise them to a higher station.

So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit. Don't
just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting for more of
your keenness. I took a poll while you were in the bathroom - plenty
of time...

Blowhard.

Pastorio

"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
...
> What happened to your brilliant exposition about human nutrition and
> metabolic functions? I really expected you to post lots of references
> and documentation of your deep understanding of the subject, nearly.
>
> I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily available
> should take pity on the less informed and just offer the huddled
> masses the benefit of that superior grasp of it all. You know, to
> raise them to a higher station.
>
> So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit. Don't
> just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting for more of
> your keenness. I took a poll while you were in the bathroom - plenty
> of time...

> Blowhard.

How can you intelligently converse with someone who resorts to name calling
for no reason? You can't! Back to reality I guess...

> Pastorio
>

"Steve Wertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 14 May 2004 02:40:51 -0400, "Bob (this one)"
> > wrote:
>
> >What happened to your brilliant exposition about human nutrition and
> >metabolic functions?
>
> I think he's still filling out that questionaire I gave him.
> He sure does get riled up when somebody mentions Atkins or
> low-carb.
>
> -sw

Has anyone here every Googled "steve wertz"? Wow, this guy is the KING of
KOOK's. And he seems to be closely followed by several of the other thugs in
this NG. I guess I got sucked into believing there might have been some
spark of intellingence at the other end of these guys but from the record
these guys have, obviously not. This IS their life, period, they have no
friends and IF they have jobs they must surely find themselves alone at the
watercooler and eat lunch alone on a daily basis. YOU guys are the real
diseases that infect Usenet. I can only imagine what kind of bandwidth we
could save without you creating all the utterly sickening threads of name
calling and bitching. Step away from the monitor Steve and go turn on
Springer, at least you won't be wasting anyone elses time but your own.

> Oh no - He Googled me! *This* is why I gave you the kook
> questionnaire. You're doing everything exactly like the book says.
>
> >YOU guys are the real diseases that infect Usenet.
>
> Uh, we all work independently of others. Except on Friday
> afternoon when we all get together, drink a lot of Zima, pass out
> the assignments and discuss new strategies.
>
> Ooops - Which reminds me [looking at clock] I better take my
> weekly shower and get dressed - can't keep the Head Moose waiting.
>
> -sw

Won't be able to make the meeting this time - going to Fort Worth this
afternoon. No time to banter here all weekend either. Making time in the
schedule to eat a Kincaid's hamburger, home of "the best hamburger in the
USA" - yummers

http://www.fwculture.com/kincaids.htm

--
Catbird

"Oh-oh, her schizo is about to phrenia" - Bob Hope

Tesoro wrote:

> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>What happened to your brilliant exposition about human nutrition and
>>metabolic functions? I really expected you to post lots of references
>>and documentation of your deep understanding of the subject, nearly.
>>
>>I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily available
>>should take pity on the less informed and just offer the huddled
>>masses the benefit of that superior grasp of it all. You know, to
>>raise them to a higher station.
>>
>>So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit. Don't
>>just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting for more of
>>your keenness. I took a poll while you were in the bathroom - plenty
>>of time...
>
>>Blowhard.
>
> How can you intelligently converse with someone who resorts to name calling
> for no reason?

Oh, no, Tessie. You got those names (as they say in the commercials)
the old fashioned way, you earned them.

It's all about your blasting in, ignorantly pontificating and
splashing your uninformed opinion around, about subjects you have the
most shallow knowledge about and getting all snide and stupid when
questioned or disputed.

> You can't! Back to reality I guess...

Bwah. The reality of showing your rigid superficiality and rather sad
insistence on your opinion irrespective of any actual information from
substantial sources.

You asked for cites, I gave you cites. You shut up, tucked your tail
between your legs and scurried out of the discussion without so much
as a word of recognition. Real schoolyard bully crap. All big and
tough until somebody shows your crap for the compost it is. Then skulk
away silently.

Wow.

What a classy guy...

Pastorio

Steve Wertz wrote:

> On Fri, 14 May 2004 09:39:35 -0400, "Tesoro" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Steve Wertz" > wrote in
>> message ...
>>
>>> On Fri, 14 May 2004 02:40:51 -0400, "Bob (this one)"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> What happened to your brilliant exposition about human
>>>> nutrition and metabolic functions?
>>>
>>> I think he's still filling out that questionaire I gave him. He
>>> sure does get riled up when somebody mentions Atkins or
>>> low-carb.
>>
>> Has anyone here every Googled "steve wertz"?
>
> Oh no - He Googled me! *This* is why I gave you the kook
> questionnaire. You're doing everything exactly like the book says.
>
>> YOU guys are the real diseases that infect Usenet.
>
> Uh, we all work independently of others. Except on Friday
> afternoon when we all get together, drink a lot of Zima, pass out
> the assignments and discuss new strategies.
>
> Ooops - Which reminds me [looking at clock] I better take my weekly
> shower and get dressed - can't keep the Head Moose waiting.

Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about the Zima. Gives me
terrible gasses. Comes out sounding like TESS-o-r-O-o-Ooooo.

Last Friday, all those nice people in the elevator were screaming and
crying. By the time we got to the 53rd floor, several were
unconscious. I think we should look into other things to drink; maybe
not so fizzy. Just a thought.

Pastorio

"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
...
> Tesoro wrote:
>
> > "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>What happened to your brilliant exposition about human nutrition and
> >>metabolic functions? I really expected you to post lots of references
> >>and documentation of your deep understanding of the subject, nearly.
> >>
> >>I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily available
> >>should take pity on the less informed and just offer the huddled
> >>masses the benefit of that superior grasp of it all. You know, to
> >>raise them to a higher station.
> >>
> >>So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit. Don't
> >>just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting for more of
> >>your keenness. I took a poll while you were in the bathroom - plenty
> >>of time...
> >
> >>Blowhard.
> >
> > How can you intelligently converse with someone who resorts to name
calling
> > for no reason?
>
> Oh, no, Tessie. You got those names (as they say in the commercials)
> the old fashioned way, you earned them.

> It's all about your blasting in, ignorantly pontificating and
> splashing your uninformed opinion around, about subjects you have the
> most shallow knowledge about and getting all snide and stupid when
> questioned or disputed.

Show me "blasting in". Show me ignorantly pontificating. Show me "snide and
stupid". Quote me....

> > You can't! Back to reality I guess...
>
> Bwah. The reality of showing your rigid superficiality and rather sad
> insistence on your opinion irrespective of any actual information from
> substantial sources.
>
> You asked for cites, I gave you cites. You shut up, tucked your tail
> between your legs and scurried out of the discussion without so much
> as a word of recognition. Real schoolyard bully crap. All big and
> tough until somebody shows your crap for the compost it is. Then skulk
> away silently.

Has anyone ever googled Bob(this one)? Another thug! Big and tough in the
NG's with no life, very sad. Now that I realize who I'm try to communicate
it makes it easier to NOT.


> Wow.
>
> What a classy guy...

Thank-you Pastie...


> Pastorio
>

Tesoro wrote:

> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Tesoro wrote:
>>
>>> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>>> What happened to your brilliant exposition about human
>>>> nutrition and metabolic functions? I really expected you to
>>>> post lots of references and documentation of your deep
>>>> understanding of the subject, nearly.
>>>>
>>>> I mean, anybody who has so much information so readily
>>>> available should take pity on the less informed and just
>>>> offer the huddled masses the benefit of that superior grasp
>>>> of it all. You know, to raise them to a higher station.
>>>>
>>>> So tell everybody about carbs and fats and glycogen 'n shit.
>>>> Don't just scurry off like that. Really. Everyone is waiting
>>>> for more of your keenness. I took a poll while you were in
>>>> the bathroom - plenty of time...
>>>
>>>> Blowhard.
>>>
>>> How can you intelligently converse with someone who resorts to
>>> name calling for no reason?
>>
>> Oh, no, Tessie. You got those names (as they say in the
>> commercials) the old fashioned way, you earned them.
>
>> It's all about your blasting in, ignorantly pontificating and
>> splashing your uninformed opinion around, about subjects you have
>> the most shallow knowledge about and getting all snide and stupid
>> when questioned or disputed.
>
> Show me "blasting in". Show me ignorantly pontificating. Show me
> "snide and stupid". Quote me....

Another sad sack who can't read his own work and see the spirit and
tone. Another holder of The Truth. Here's an easy one. Read your own
words about low carb, then read the contradictory citations from
scientists and scholars and then see your craven silence. Like that.
See how you insist you're right with no supporting information, just
demanding acceptance.

>>> You can't! Back to reality I guess...

<LOL> Good way to hold a conversation. No need to trouble anyone else.
Just ask and answer all the questions yourself. Terrifically
efficient. No need to distract others who might point and laugh. <LOL>

>> Bwah. The reality of showing your rigid superficiality and rather
>> sad insistence on your opinion irrespective of any actual
>> information from substantial sources.
>>
>> You asked for cites, I gave you cites. You shut up, tucked your
>> tail between your legs and scurried out of the discussion without
>> so much as a word of recognition. Real schoolyard bully crap. All
>> big and tough until somebody shows your crap for the compost it
>> is. Then skulk away silently.
>
> Has anyone ever googled Bob(this one)? Another thug!

<LOL> Nice try, oily one. Note the abrupt change of subject. Note no
recognition of his own actions and note no grasp of what would be the
manly thing to do about his failures in biological understanding and
his flawed grasp of metabolism. Note no recognition of the citations
he wanted. Especially note no new data.

> Big and tough in the NG's with no life, very sad. Now that I
> realize who I'm try to communicate it makes it easier to NOT.

Another hilarity. You haven't the remotest idea who you're googling.
More leaping to unfounded conclusions. I'd say that was one of the big
hallmarks of your way of doing things.

>> Wow.
>>
>> What a classy guy...
>
> Thank-you Pastie...
>
>> Pastorio

Zowie, what an uptown wizard you are, Treasure.

So where's all that "information" you were going to provide? That
"medical science" you mentioned. I don't see any, just snotty attempts
to evade and distract. Are you going to put up or will you just
continue to make empty noise?

Pastorio

Steve Wertz wrote:

> On Fri, 14 May 2004 19:49:09 -0400, "Bob (this one)"
> > wrote:
>
>>Steve Wertz wrote:
>
>>>Uh, we all work independently of others. Except on Friday
>>>afternoon when we all get together, drink a lot of Zima, pass out
>>>the assignments and discuss new strategies.
>>>
>>>Ooops - Which reminds me [looking at clock] I better take my weekly
>>>shower and get dressed - can't keep the Head Moose waiting.
>>
>>Listen, I've been meaning to talk to you about the Zima. Gives me
>>terrible gasses. Comes out sounding like TESS-o-r-O-o-Ooooo.
>>
>>Last Friday, all those nice people in the elevator were screaming and
>>crying. By the time we got to the 53rd floor, several were
>>unconscious. I think we should look into other things to drink; maybe
>>not so fizzy. Just a thought.
>
>
> Well, I'm sure you understand the politics involved here. The Zima
> guys have been generous and supporting sponsors of The Cabal since
> it's inception, so we have to tread carefully so we don't offend
> them. You're not the first to bring this up.
>
> The good news is that some of the Zima folks have been pushing for
> us to offer probationary invitations to their Coors colleagues.
> This would seem to be a win-win situation for everyone. The Zima
> guys get a pat on the back from Coors, Coors gets recognition from
> the Cabal, and we get access to several more brands, most notably
> the Bartles & James wine coolers.
>
> There's still the usual red-tape, background checks, proprietary
> agreements, etc... You know how that goes. But hopefully this
> will all be done in time for our July 4th flame-fest. Stay tuned!

Yes. Flames. That's the other effect that the Zima has with me. Three
Fridays ago after the meeting of the cabal (TINC), I was walking to my
53 'Vette when one of those dog-walkers came up behind me. I
scorched a Corgi and ignited a hapless Dalmation who was astonished
that the fire came to him for a change although the white bandages
blended right in on the little guy. I tell you we need to do something
before we all go into full afterburner.

I can't wait for the B&J Coolers. Maybe then we'll also trail
different colors. Red, white, (are they the guys who make that blue
stuff...?)

Bob

"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
...
>
> So where's all that "information" you were going to provide? That
> "medical science" you mentioned. I don't see any, just snotty attempts
> to evade and distract. Are you going to put up or will you just
> continue to make empty noise?
>

Bob, you already know the answer to that one. Do you really want to waste
time sparring with that ignorant gasbag?

--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

On Sat, 15 May 2004 01:43:57 -0400, "Bob (this one)" >
wrote:

>Steve Wertz wrote:

>> Well, I'm sure you understand the politics involved here. The Zima
>> guys have been generous and supporting sponsors of The Cabal since
>> it's inception, so we have to tread carefully so we don't offend
>> them. You're not the first to bring this up.
>>

>Yes. Flames. That's the other effect that the Zima has with me. Three
>Fridays ago after the meeting of the cabal (TINC), I was walking to my
> 53 'Vette when one of those dog-walkers came up behind me. I
>scorched a Corgi and ignited a hapless Dalmation who was astonished
>that the fire came to him for a change although the white bandages
>blended right in on the little guy. I tell you we need to do something
>before we all go into full afterburner.
>
>I can't wait for the B&J Coolers. Maybe then we'll also trail
>different colors. Red, white, (are they the guys who make that blue
>stuff...?)
>
>Bob


O.K. that did it. I have sat here and listen to you two speak all of
the insider information of our sacred cabal. And I might add caused
the A.S,P.C.A. to send us a sternly worded letter.
You have exposed us to the outside world. How can a cabal function in
the light of day.(mutter mutter)
Any further leaks will delay your entrance into the coveted MD 20/20
division.
Pan Ohco

"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
>
> > "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>So where's all that "information" you were going to provide? That
> >>"medical science" you mentioned. I don't see any, just snotty attempts
> >>to evade and distract. Are you going to put up or will you just
> >>continue to make empty noise?
> >>
> > Bob, you already know the answer to that one. Do you really want to
waste
> > time sparring with that ignorant gasbag?
>
> Come, Peter. You could see it wasn't actually sparring. That implies
> an actual opponent. Think of it more like throwing the coat out the
> door at the rapidly retreating figure. Not to make too much of it...
>
> Pastorio
>

Oh indeed I know, Bob. After a point, however, it seems pointless to waste
time on such people. Sort of like kicking a 3-legged puppy.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.