On Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:31:28 -0400, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "Bob (this one)" > instead replied:

>You delete it because you find nothing wrong with it. The bizarre
>self-excusing illogicality of this is stunning.
>
>You deleted a plea for help from hundreds of thousands - millions - of
>victims on the greatest natural or man-made disaster in American history
>because you find nothing wrong with it.

I deleted it from MY reply, not your original post, Bob. Your
original post is still quite there. You seem to be barking at the
moon over that aspect.
--
Ray

Bob (this one) wrote
>
> Poor Jim. No delete key. No filtering capability. Try Jockeys, they
> don't get quite as twisted as boxers.
>
> You know, look as I might in Google, I can't find much in the way of
> contribution from you here - 6 posts since May.

Poor Bob, he doesn't have the sufficient intellect to understand that
sometimes people need to change ISPs. Speaking of underwear, you might
take a stab at unbunching your own; you might feel slightly less bitchy
once the discomfort is gone.
The fact that you're looking me up on Google creeps me out a bit
though. Netstalk much?

> I know we all need net nannies to keep all us unruly folks in line and
> give preachy lectures, but that job is already effectively being done by
> a few others who also contribute stuff.
>
All that I suggested was that you keep your little personal hissy fits
in the appropriate group, instead of polluting several other groups.
Is that too hard for you to grasp, Bob? You do understand that neither
usenet nor the world revolve around Bob Pastorio, right?
Well, no. Obviously you don't. Poor Bob. What a sad little egocentrist.

> But thank you very much for your feedback. Your gift certificate for all
> the mulch you can shovel should arrive soon.

> Pastorio

Here's a helpful hint for you, Bob.
http--flackadelic.typepad.com-flackadelic-images-stfu.jpg

I'm done with you. I don't care to partake in your self-centered
bullshit anymore.
Jim
--
"Some people are like Slinkies. They really aren't much good for
anything, but they still bring a smile to your face when you push them
down a flight of stairs."

jinym wrote:
> Bob (this one) wrote
>
>>Poor Jim. No delete key. No filtering capability. Try Jockeys, they
>>don't get quite as twisted as boxers.
>>
>>You know, look as I might in Google, I can't find much in the way of
>>contribution from you here - 6 posts since May.
>
> Poor Bob, he doesn't have the sufficient intellect to understand that
> sometimes people need to change ISPs. Speaking of underwear, you might
> take a stab at unbunching your own; you might feel slightly less bitchy
> once the discomfort is gone.

Wonderful post. Splendid lack of content. Just like your previous ones.

> The fact that you're looking me up on Google creeps me out a bit
> though. Netstalk much?

Bite this stalk, Jim. Innuendo is pretty slim when it's all you have. I
looked you up because I haven't noticed you before. After seeing your
six posts since last May, I can see why. The posts are delightfully free
of anything requiring thought.

>>I know we all need net nannies to keep all us unruly folks in line and
>>give preachy lectures, but that job is already effectively being done by
>>a few others who also contribute stuff.
>>
> All that I suggested was that you keep your little personal hissy fits
> in the appropriate group, instead of polluting several other groups.

Yes, and I thanked you in a manner most appropriate to your whining.

> Is that too hard for you to grasp, Bob? You do understand that neither
> usenet nor the world revolve around Bob Pastorio, right?
> Well, no. Obviously you don't. Poor Bob. What a sad little egocentrist.

<LOL> Good try, Slim Jim. But your nannying sure looks like you think
you can speak for lots of other people. You're just like everybody else
who knows how the rest of us should live and act. Is there a rule in
that list of commandments you have about live your own life and let
others live theirs? Didn't think so.

>>But thank you very much for your feedback. Your gift certificate for all
>>the mulch you can shovel should arrive soon.
>
>>Pastorio
>
> Here's a helpful hint for you, Bob.
> http--flackadelic.typepad.com-flackadelic-images-stfu.jpg

The way you write URL's... you must be new to this internet/usenet thing
and don't grasp the convention. Let me help you out here. The correct
one is:
<http://flackadelic.typepad.com/flackadelic/images/stfu.jpg>

I can't tell you how much I admire your feeble efforts here. Ooops. I
guess I just did. Anyway, here's a URL for you (note the form):
<http://tinyurl.com/ey8gl>

> I'm done with you. I don't care to partake in your self-centered
> bullshit anymore.

You don't mean partake in. You either mean "participate in" or "partake
of." Partake of means "to take or have a share in, as a meal..."
Bullshit, you say...?

English is a hardly language, either. Right Jim?

Pastorio