General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Victor Sack
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree

Official Announcement

Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".

The Cabal (TINC)
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Victor Sack
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

Margaret Suran > wrote:

> > (Victor Sack) wrote:
> >
> >> Official Announcement
> >>
> >>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
> >>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
> >>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
> >>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
> >>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
> >>
> >>The Cabal (TINC)

>
> I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
> (TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
> not conducive to strutting around in the nude.


The offender in question has brought it all upon herself by discarding
her historic Dress and exposing herself to the innocent trollop
multitudes, thereby nearly causing a riot. Thus, the Cabal's (TINC)
decree is actually to be considered an exceptionally mild and forgiving
one, especially as it takes into account the offender's agreement to
retain her "Damsel" designation.

It is worth knowing that the offender maintains that she is not
completely naked but is wearing some unspecified, but likely revealing,
underwear, presumably to excite the masses still further. As long as
there is no independent confirmation of this fact, there is nothing to
be done. If such is forthcoming, and depending on the nature of the
unmentionables in question, there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".

The Cabal (TINC)




  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Melba's Jammin'
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

In article >,
Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote:
(snippage)
> >
> >I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
> >(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
> >not conducive to strutting around in the nude.
> >
> >I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
> >the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
> >behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
> >an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
> >Indemnity.
> >
> >If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
> >wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
> >to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
> >shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.

>
> <apologies for not snipping, but I couldn't figure out what to snip>
>
> As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
> contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
> the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
> TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
> redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
> thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
> alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
> jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
> set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
> face.
>
> Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
> Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
> circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.
>
> Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd


I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the bullshit
down pat.
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 10-20-05 with a note from Niece Jo.
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Terry Pulliam Burd
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:37:01 -0500, Margaret Suran
> wrote:

>
>
>Melba's Jammin' wrote:
>> In article >,
>> (Victor Sack) wrote:


In article >,
(Victor Sack) wrote:

>>> Official Announcement
>>>
>>>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
>>>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
>>>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
>>>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
>>>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
>>>
>>>The Cabal (TINC)

>>
>>
>> To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.

>
>I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
>(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
>not conducive to strutting around in the nude.
>
>I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
>the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
>behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
>an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
>Indemnity.
>
>If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
>wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
>to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
>shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.


<apologies for not snipping, but I couldn't figure out what to snip>

As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
face.

Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"
  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Victor Sack
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote:

> (Victor Sack) wrote:
>
> >>> Official Announcement
> >>>
> >>>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
> >>>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
> >>>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
> >>>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
> >>>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
> >>>
> >>>The Cabal (TINC)

>
> As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
> contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
> the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
> TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
> redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
> thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
> alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
> jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
> set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
> face.


The above paralegal opinion is hereby declared irrelevant, without merit
and thus null and void, for the offender in question is not some
ordinary "sister trollop", but the one and only Head Trollop, who,
moreover, explicitly and publicly acknowledged The Cabal's (TINC)
jurisdiction over her moniker.

The not-so-concealed sneaky attempts from some corners to denigrate the
person of Head Trollop have not escaped The Cabal's (TINC) notice.
Grave as her offences are, they do not warrant equating her with
ordinary sister trollops, let alone with invertebrates like shrimp,
naked though they might be. It is clear that some individuals are using
the current scandal for actively trying to undermine and ultimately
usurp the Head Trollop's enviable position under the guise of defending
the indefensible. The Cabal (TINC) is, for the time being, reserving
action against the individuals involved.

The Cabal (TINC)
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
sf
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 23:43:14 +0100, Victor Sack wrote:

> there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
> decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".


OMG You are absolutely hysterical.... I can't stop laughing!


  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
sf
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:35:13 -0800, Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:

> Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
> Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
> circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.



Hey, I "resemble" that!




  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
sf
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:06:12 -0500, Melba's Jammin' wrote:

> I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
> explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
> for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the bullshit
> down pat.


She wrote it, they signed it. That's why they got the big bucks.
  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Damsel-in-dese-Drawers
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry


Victor Sack wrote:
> Margaret Suran > wrote:
>
> > > (Victor Sack) wrote:
> > >
> > >> Official Announcement
> > >>
> > >>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
> > >>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
> > >>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
> > >>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
> > >>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
> > >>
> > >>The Cabal (TINC)

> >
> > I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
> > (TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
> > not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

>
> The offender in question has brought it all upon herself by discarding
> her historic Dress and exposing herself to the innocent trollop
> multitudes, thereby nearly causing a riot. Thus, the Cabal's (TINC)
> decree is actually to be considered an exceptionally mild and forgiving
> one, especially as it takes into account the offender's agreement to
> retain her "Damsel" designation.


"Innocent trollop" is an oxymoron.

> It is worth knowing that the offender maintains that she is not
> completely naked but is wearing some unspecified, but likely revealing,
> underwear, presumably to excite the masses still further. As long as
> there is no independent confirmation of this fact, there is nothing to
> be done. If such is forthcoming, and depending on the nature of the
> unmentionables in question, there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
> decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".


Fruit of the Loom cotton granny panties. Size 10.

Phlbt!
Me

  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Damsel-in-dese-Drawers
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry


Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:37:01 -0500, Margaret Suran
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Melba's Jammin' wrote:
> >> In article >,
> >> (Victor Sack) wrote:

>
> In article >,
>
(Victor Sack) wrote:
>
> >>> Official Announcement
> >>>
> >>>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
> >>>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
> >>>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
> >>>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
> >>>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
> >>>
> >>>The Cabal (TINC)
> >>
> >>
> >> To D-i-t-N ! Hear, hear! Long may she live and flourish.

> >
> >I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
> >(TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
> >not conducive to strutting around in the nude.
> >
> >I would like to know whether Terry can advise us as to whether what
> >the Cabal (TINC) has decreed, is even legal. After all, if the power
> >behind that decree is a man who is also an 83 year old grandmother and
> >an 85 year old janitor, it sounds as if this is a case of Triple
> >Indemnity.
> >
> >If Terry cannot get involved with this, I know that Carol will have a
> >wonderful spokes person in Nancy Young. Nancy, where are you? Come
> >to the aid of your good friend, Carol, who is without any doubt,
> >shivering from the cold and from the injustice of it all.

>
> <apologies for not snipping, but I couldn't figure out what to snip>
>
> As one of the original Trollops, I believe I can say without fear of
> contradiction that our original charter covers just such an attempt at
> the usurpation of our Rights and Privileges as Mr. Sack and his
> TINCers has, uh, attempted. Only a sister Trollop has the authority to
> redefine a a sister Trollop's moniker and mode of dress or lack
> thereof. Therefore, this Trollop is informed and believes and thereon
> alleges that TINCers are without standing in the matter, lack
> jurisdiction and <peering closely at Mr. Sack> has really beady eyes,
> set too close together, which pretty much decides the matter on its
> face.
>
> Appeals may be heard at the Ninth Circuit, also known as the Nutty
> Ninth, due to their decisions being reversed more than any other
> circuit in the United States, for all the good it will do them.


Thanks so much for your efforts, Terry. But I've caved under Victor's
brutal bullying.

Carol

Carol

  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Melba's Jammin'
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

In article .com>,
"Damsel-in-dese-Drawers" > wrote:

> Victor Sack wrote:
> > Margaret Suran > wrote:
> >
> > > > (Victor Sack) wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Official Announcement
> > > >>
> > > >>Upon careful consideration of the case of a grave offence against public
> > > >>decency on the trollop family newsgroup and an active insubordination by
> > > >>the formerly named "Damsel-in-dis-Dress", The Cabal (TINC) hereby
> > > >>decrees that, as a reflection of the new and regrettable reality, the
> > > >>above person is henceforth to be referred to as "Damsel-in-the-Nude".
> > > >>
> > > >>The Cabal (TINC)
> > >
> > > I have already voiced my opinion in a private email to the Cabal
> > > (TINC). It is a heartless decree, all the more so, as the weather is
> > > not conducive to strutting around in the nude.

> >
> > The offender in question has brought it all upon herself by discarding
> > her historic Dress and exposing herself to the innocent trollop
> > multitudes, thereby nearly causing a riot. Thus, the Cabal's (TINC)
> > decree is actually to be considered an exceptionally mild and forgiving
> > one, especially as it takes into account the offender's agreement to
> > retain her "Damsel" designation.

>
> "Innocent trollop" is an oxymoron.
>
> > It is worth knowing that the offender maintains that she is not
> > completely naked but is wearing some unspecified, but likely revealing,
> > underwear, presumably to excite the masses still further. As long as
> > there is no independent confirmation of this fact, there is nothing to
> > be done. If such is forthcoming, and depending on the nature of the
> > unmentionables in question, there is a chance that the Cabal (TINC) will
> > decree that the offender be referred to as "Damsel-in-dese-Drawers".

>
> Fruit of the Loom cotton granny panties. Size 10.
>
> Phlbt!
> Me


TMI, Dams, T M I
--
http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 10-20-05 with a note from Niece Jo.
  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Terry Pulliam Burd
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:06:12 -0500, Melba's Jammin'
> wrote:

>I knew you could be counted on for a clear and logical ruling and
>explanation thereof. Question: Why'd you quit at paralegal and not go
>for the LLB (NOT LLBean) or whatever it is? You've got the bullshit
>down pat.


First of all, I like being a paralegal, esp. with the boss I have who
respects my experience and values my advice. Also, I don't have to
deal with bullsh*t clients the way he does and the CLE requirements
are dead easy *and* a court calendar doesn't rule my life (call a temp
service and I'm outta there). As to the second part of your question,
I started law school twice. The ex, Mr. Corporate America, got
transferred during a) my first year in law school, and b) my second
year in law school. That's nearly three years down the tubes. The next
time we moved, I enrolled in our local law school's paralegal program
immediately, which took 2 years, and here you are. And the law degree
is a JD. They quit hading out LLBs somewhere during the administration
of Warren G. Harding <veg>

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"


  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Damsel
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:
>
> Ain't no way
> no stinkin' TINCs gots joorisdiction here an' I gots case law to prove
> it: Trollops v. Peanut Butter and Mayonnaise Sandwich (9th Cir. 1995)
> 319 F.3d 575, 579 and Anita Bryant v. Trollops (1988) 534 S.Ct. 767,
> 768 and statchoot: U.S.C. Section 7 Come 11.


Heaven help us all from Anita Bryant. Is that bitch dead yet?

Carol

  #18 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Victor Sack
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote:

> (Victor Sack) wrote:
>
> >It is clear that some individuals are using
> >the current scandal for actively trying to undermine and ultimately
> >usurp the Head Trollop's enviable position under the guise of defending
> >the indefensible. The Cabal (TINC) is, for the time being, reserving
> >action against the individuals involved.

>
> Victuh, youse totally misunduhstands my position heah, which is
> consigliere for dah Trollops, an' in pahticulah da Head Trollop, Dams,
> whose legal position is dat TINC ain't got no joorisdiction over Dams
> or da Trollops as Dams ain't got no legal ability to waive any of da
> Trollops' rights and responsibilities over dere monikers. Ain't no way
> no stinkin' TINCs gots joorisdiction here an' I gots case law to prove
> it: Trollops v. Peanut Butter and Mayonnaise Sandwich (9th Cir. 1995)
> 319 F.3d 575, 579 and Anita Bryant v. Trollops (1988) 534 S.Ct. 767,
> 768 and statchoot: U.S.C. Section 7 Come 11.


This is yet another shameless attempt to lessen, demean and denigrate
the high office and the revered, though naked and fallible, person of
the Head Trollop and to undermine the Head Trollop's true rights and
responsibilities, which, according to the original charter are nearly
limitless and only subject to The Cabal's control. The Head Trollop has
never been subject to decisions or pronouncements of any parochial
Circuits, being subject only to international laws laid down by The
Cabal. The Cabal, in turn, is a trans-, extra-, and
supra-jurisdictional entity with a grasp that is not only international
but universal and extends over every living and non-living subject or
object, including little green men and even Barb Schaller, a
self-confessed alien. It is, of course, subject to no earthly laws at
all, not even to the one resulting from the famous international case of
Trollops v. Rotten Vegetables that established the beetroot as the rfc's
official vegetable, beetroot kvas (fermented beetroot juice) as its
official drink, and Barb's Beety Beauty as its official jelly.

The Cabal (TINC)
  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Terry Pulliam Burd
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:43:07 +0100, (Victor Sack)
wrote:

>This is yet another shameless attempt to lessen, demean and denigrate
>the high office and the revered, though naked and fallible, person of
>the Head Trollop and to undermine the Head Trollop's true rights and
>responsibilities, which, according to the original charter are nearly
>limitless and only subject to The Cabal's control. The Head Trollop has
>never been subject to decisions or pronouncements of any parochial
>Circuits, being subject only to international laws laid down by The
>Cabal. The Cabal, in turn, is a trans-, extra-, and
>supra-jurisdictional entity with a grasp that is not only international
>but universal and extends over every living and non-living subject or
>object, including little green men and even Barb Schaller, a
>self-confessed alien. It is, of course, subject to no earthly laws at
>all, not even to the one resulting from the famous international case of
>Trollops v. Rotten Vegetables that established the beetroot as the rfc's
>official vegetable, beetroot kvas (fermented beetroot juice) as its
>official drink, and Barb's Beety Beauty as its official jelly.


Okay, Vic, youse have completely crossed da line with da beets. Ain't
no way dat a self-respectin' Trollop is gonna endorse a <shudder>
beet. Damned things have the consistency of dense Jello, never mind
the <blecch> taste.

And if youse gotta resort to international and extraterrestial law
(Antonin Scalia will have youse head on a plate for dis, youse know),
youse is overreachin', pal. RFC and the Trollops are laws unto
themselves. Ain't no steenkin' Cabal/TINCers gonna dictate to no
Trollops. Please be talkin' to our lawyers at
http://www.cochranfirm.com/ and don't be talkin' no more smack to da
Trollops!

Dams, you kin have a nekkid moniker if youse want, but ain't no
steekin' Cabal/TINCers gonna force yer moniker change. <humph>

Terry "Squeaks" Pulliam Burd
AAC(F)BV66.0748.CA

"If the soup had been as hot as the claret, if the claret had been as
old as the bird, and if the bird's breasts had been as full as the
waitress's, it would have been a very good dinner."

-- Duncan Hines

To reply, replace "spaminator" with "cox"
  #20 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
sf
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

On 31 Oct 2005 20:09:50 -0800, Damsel wrote:

> Terry Pulliam Burd wrote:
> >
> > Ain't no way
> > no stinkin' TINCs gots joorisdiction here an' I gots case law to prove
> > it: Trollops v. Peanut Butter and Mayonnaise Sandwich (9th Cir. 1995)
> > 319 F.3d 575, 579 and Anita Bryant v. Trollops (1988) 534 S.Ct. 767,
> > 768 and statchoot: U.S.C. Section 7 Come 11.

>
> Heaven help us all from Anita Bryant. Is that bitch dead yet?
>

CAROL! I'm absolutely shocked.... I thought you only called people
you liked "bitch".

Hmmm, I'm rethinking a previous post now.




  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
Victor Sack
 
Posts: n/a
Default The Decree Pin g Terry

Terry Pulliam Burd > wrote:

> (Victor Sack) wrote:
>
> >This is yet another shameless attempt to lessen, demean and denigrate
> >the high office and the revered, though naked and fallible, person of
> >the Head Trollop and to undermine the Head Trollop's true rights and
> >responsibilities, which, according to the original charter are nearly
> >limitless and only subject to The Cabal's control. The Head Trollop has
> >never been subject to decisions or pronouncements of any parochial
> >Circuits, being subject only to international laws laid down by The
> >Cabal. The Cabal, in turn, is a trans-, extra-, and
> >supra-jurisdictional entity with a grasp that is not only international
> >but universal and extends over every living and non-living subject or
> >object, including little green men and even Barb Schaller, a
> >self-confessed alien. It is, of course, subject to no earthly laws at
> >all, not even to the one resulting from the famous international case of
> >Trollops v. Rotten Vegetables that established the beetroot as the rfc's
> >official vegetable, beetroot kvas (fermented beetroot juice) as its
> >official drink, and Barb's Beety Beauty as its official jelly.

>
> Okay, Vic, youse have completely crossed da line with da beets. Ain't
> no way dat a self-respectin' Trollop is gonna endorse a <shudder>
> beet. Damned things have the consistency of dense Jello, never mind
> the <blecch> taste.


But they did! In that very famous international case, which was not
even initiated (only supported) by the Cabal (TINC). And, besides, the
blessed things don't have any such consistency if cooked correctly.

> And if youse gotta resort to international and extraterrestial law
> (Antonin Scalia will have youse head on a plate for dis, youse know),
> youse is overreachin', pal.


Scalia and his court of local significance has absolutely no chance
against the cabbalistic Universal Cabal (TINCUC).

> RFC and the Trollops are laws unto
> themselves.


Only as long as The Cabal (TINC) is willing to tolerate them.

> Ain't no steenkin' Cabal/TINCers gonna dictate to no
> Trollops.


But The Cabal (TINC) does!

> Please be talkin' to our lawyers at
>
http://www.cochranfirm.com/ and don't be talkin' no more smack to da
> Trollops!


No jurisdiction.

> Dams, you kin have a nekkid moniker if youse want, but ain't no
> steekin' Cabal/TINCers gonna force yer moniker change. <humph>


The law-abiding Head Trollop has returned to the Cabal's (TINC) warm and
inviting fold and donned her historic Dress again.

The Cabal (TINC)
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"