Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>
> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> >>
> >> Paul Schilter wrote:
> >>
> >> > Pramesh,
> >> > He laughed! You heard "Him"? How the come I never get to hear these
> >> > things? Too obtuse probably. :-) In all seriousness, isn't God just
> >> > someone whom other men have told us about? If God wanted to instruct
> >> > us, couldn't he just come down and do it His/Her self. Why is God
> >> > always a male.
> >>
> >> Religious fanatics always speak in the name of some god(s) telling others
> >> what to do. If you claim to also heard the words of God(s) then they
> >> attack you. The reality is they speak out of their own desire to
> >> exercise power over others.
> >>
> >> As to god(s) gender, that depends on the god and the
> >> patriarchal/matriarchal
> >> leanings of the culture in which that/those god(s) was/were created. The
> >> trintatarian-polytheistic god has at least two penises, God the father
> >> ****ed a 13 year old Mary and the ******* child that ostensibly resulted
> >> ran around with a bevy of prostitutes. Mythology has a lot of weird
> >> twists and turns that way.
> >
> > "A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out
lies." (Proverbs 14:5)
>
> Run and hide from the truth.

That is how I would describe what you just did.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>>
>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>
>> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Paul Schilter wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Pramesh,
>> >> > He laughed! You heard "Him"? How the come I never get to hear these
>> >> > things? Too obtuse probably. :-) In all seriousness, isn't God just
>> >> > someone whom other men have told us about? If God wanted to instruct
>> >> > us, couldn't he just come down and do it His/Her self. Why is God
>> >> > always a male.
>> >>
>> >> Religious fanatics always speak in the name of some god(s) telling
>> >> others
>> >> what to do. If you claim to also heard the words of God(s) then they
>> >> attack you. The reality is they speak out of their own desire to
>> >> exercise power over others.
>> >>
>> >> As to god(s) gender, that depends on the god and the
>> >> patriarchal/matriarchal
>> >> leanings of the culture in which that/those god(s) was/were created.
>> >> The
>> >> trintatarian-polytheistic god has at least two penises, God the father
>> >> ****ed a 13 year old Mary and the ******* child that ostensibly
>> >> resulted
>> >> ran around with a bevy of prostitutes. Mythology has a lot of weird
>> >> twists and turns that way.
>> >
>> > "A truthful witness does not deceive, but a false witness pours out
> lies." (Proverbs 14:5)
>>
>> Run and hide from the truth.
>
> That is how I would describe what you just did.

Hey kids, let's keep it out of alt.atheism, shall we?
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> > Run and hide from the truth.
>
> That is how I would describe what you just did.

This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.

> Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
> http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
> For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
> the LORD has reshaped me:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

Matthew 6:6
But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

> In Christ's love always,

Matthew 10:14
And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.

> Andrew
> http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> > > Run and hide from the truth.
> >
> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>
> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.

As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism

> > Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> > like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> > this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
> >
> > For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
> > the LORD has reshaped me:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
> Matthew 6:6
> But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
> shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
> which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

A signature is not a prayer.

> > In Christ's love always,
>
> Matthew 10:14
> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.

An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
rather like the plains of the wild west :-)

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:

>"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>
>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>> > > Run and hide from the truth.
>> >
>> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>
>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>
>As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism

And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
of atheists?

>> > Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>> > like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>> > this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>> >
>> > For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>> > the LORD has reshaped me:
>> >
>> > http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>>
>> Matthew 6:6
>> But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
>> shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
>> which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
>
>A signature is not a prayer.

Yours was, liar.

>> > In Christ's love always,
>>
>> Matthew 10:14
>> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
>> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
>
>An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
>rather like the plains of the wild west :-)

And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:

In your dreams, moron.

>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,

More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.

>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>
>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>> > > Run and hide from the truth.
>> >
>> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>
>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>
> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism

It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
you'll see.

Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
Think about it.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

Robibnikoff wrote:
>
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> ...
> > "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
> >> >
> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
> >>
> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
> >
> > As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>
> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
> you'll see.

Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
alt.atheism?

> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?

Your current participation would be one clue :-)

> Think about it.

What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> > wrote:
>
> >"JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
> >> >
> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
> >>
> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
> >
> >As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>
> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
> of atheists?

In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
in the LORD.

> >> > Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> >> > like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> >> > this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
> >> >
> >> > http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
> >> >
> >> > For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
> >> > the LORD has reshaped me:
> >> >
> >> > http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
> >>
> >> Matthew 6:6
> >> But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast
> >> shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
> >> which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
> >
> >A signature is not a prayer.
>
> Yours was, liar.

Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.

> >> > In Christ's love always,
> >>
> >> Matthew 10:14
> >> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
> >> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
> >
> >An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
> >rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
>
> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?

Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.

> >Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> >like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> >this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
> >
> >For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
> >the LORD has reshaped me:
>
> In your dreams, moron.

Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.

> >http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
> >
> >In Christ's love always,
>
> More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.

Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
terribly.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:41 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in
>:
>Robibnikoff wrote:
>>
>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
>> >> >
>> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>> >>
>> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>> >
>> > As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>>
>> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>> you'll see.
>
>Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
>alt.atheism?

Because you have no idea what atheism is and are here to sell your
particular brand of religion.

>> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>
>Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>
>> Think about it.
>
>What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.

Are you referring to the invention of gods by humans?

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,
>
>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>:

> "Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:03:34 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>>>> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>>>>>> Run and hide from the truth.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>>>
>>>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>>>
>>> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>>
>> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
>> of atheists?
>
> In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
> exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
> in the LORD.

What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
not just the one you believe in. Do you really expect us to take you
seriously?

>>>> Matthew 6:6
>>>> But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
>> hast
>>>> shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
>>>> which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
>>>
>>> A signature is not a prayer.
>>
>> Yours was, liar.
>
> Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.

So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.

>>>>> In Christ's love always,
>>>>
>>>> Matthew 10:14
>>>> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
>>>> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
>>>
>>> An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
>>> rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
>>
>> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
>
> Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.

It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.

>>> For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
>> how
>>> the LORD has reshaped me:

If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig. And if you're proud of
your reshaped life, don't apologise.

>> In your dreams, moron.
>
> Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
>
>>> http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>>>
>>> In Christ's love always,
>>
>> More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
>
> Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
> terribly.

It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
bothers us.

> Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

That glowing looks dangerous. Have you seen a doctor about it?

--
Hannele
aa #2221

Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:41 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>:

> Robibnikoff wrote:
>>
>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>>>> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>>>>>> Run and hide from the truth.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>>>
>>>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>>>
>>> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>>
>> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>> you'll see.
>
> Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
> alt.atheism?

It's our group, we decide what is and isn't appropiate here. You're just a
guest, behave like one.

>> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>
> Your current participation would be one clue :-)

Us being ****ed at your behaviour equals interest in your religion? Dream
on.

>> Think about it.
>
> What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.

So isn't it obvious yet we don't like your sanctimonious behaviour here?

--
Hannele
aa #2221

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> Robibnikoff wrote:
>>
>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
>> >> >
>> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>> >>
>> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>> >
>> > As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>>
>> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>> you'll see.
>
> Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
> alt.atheism?

Obviously, it's not. Your preaching god-nonsense is.

>> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>
> Your current participation would be one clue :-)

My, my. What deluded wishful thinking on your part. It's quite sad,
really.

>> Think about it.
>
> What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.

That the **** is a "mentation"?

--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
snip
> In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
> exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
> in the LORD.

So ****ing what? Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
on people that aren't interested?

snip
>> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
>
> Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.

Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested in
your delusions.


--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:09:26 +0100, in alt.atheism
"Hannele Huigens" > wrote in
<op.s0y050pgvjeuhq@laptophannele>:
>Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:41 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>:
>
>> Robibnikoff wrote:
>>>
>>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>>>>> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>>>>>>> Run and hide from the truth.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>>>>
>>>> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>>>
>>> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>>> you'll see.
>>
>> Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
>> alt.atheism?
>
>It's our group, we decide what is and isn't appropiate here. You're just a
>guest, behave like one.
>
>>> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>>
>> Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>
>Us being ****ed at your behaviour equals interest in your religion? Dream
>on.
>
>>> Think about it.
>>
>> What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>
>So isn't it obvious yet we don't like your sanctimonious behaviour here?

What's disturbing is this interesting claim that he offers "preventative
cardiology techniques exclusive and proprietary to my practice." I
cannot imagine any rational human being going to a doctor who practices
proprietary techniques.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:

>> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
>> of atheists?
>
>In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
>exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
>in the LORD.

Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
not believing in pixies?

Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:14:53 +0100 schreef David Jensen
>:

> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:09:26 +0100, in alt.atheism
> "Hannele Huigens" > wrote in
> <op.s0y050pgvjeuhq@laptophannele>:
>> Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:41 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>> >:
>>
>>> Robibnikoff wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>>>>>> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>>>>>>>> Run and hide from the truth.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>>>>>
>>>>> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>>>>
>>>> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>>>> you'll see.
>>>
>>> Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
>>> alt.atheism?
>>
>> It's our group, we decide what is and isn't appropiate here. You're
>> just a
>> guest, behave like one.
>>
>>>> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>>>
>>> Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>>
>> Us being ****ed at your behaviour equals interest in your religion?
>> Dream
>> on.
>>
>>>> Think about it.
>>>
>>> What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>>
>> So isn't it obvious yet we don't like your sanctimonious behaviour here?
>
> What's disturbing is this interesting claim that he offers "preventative
> cardiology techniques exclusive and proprietary to my practice." I
> cannot imagine any rational human being going to a doctor who practices
> proprietary techniques.

Hold on while I check the dictionary. "Proprietary, proprietary, ah, here
it is ... proprietary medicine". So does this mean the doctor refuses to
prescribe generic medicine? Or does it mean that the techniques used are
owned by somebody? How does one own a technique, exactly?
I have some problems with that diet he advertises, it's supposed to be
based upon the diet of mountain climbers. Correct me if I'm wrong, but
aren't a lot of their foodstuffs dehydrated, so wouldn't the food need
water to become edible and thereby weigh a lot more than 2 pounds?

--
Hannele
aa #2221

Andrew, perhaps this article can help you onto the path of living in the
real world...


The Atlantic Monthly | December 2005

Is God an Accident?

Despite the vast number of religions, nearly everyone in the world believes
in the same things: the existence of a soul, an afterlife, miracles, and the
divine creation of the universe. Recently psychologists doing research on
the minds of infants have discovered two related facts that may account for
this phenomenon. One: human beings come into the world with a predisposition
to believe in supernatural phenomena. And two: this predisposition is an
incidental by-product of cognitive functioning gone awry. Which leads to the
question ...
by Paul Bloom

I. God Is Not Dead

When I was a teenager my rabbi believed that the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who was
living in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, was the Messiah, and that the world was
soon to end. He believed that the earth was a few thousand years old, and
that the fossil record was a consequence of the Great Flood. He could
describe the afterlife, and was able to answer adolescent questions about
the fate of Hitler's soul.

Dear Jim,

Your interest in the straight and narrow path that I am walking on with
the LORD is appreciated. You are welcome to join in this walk anytime.

In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Jim whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Jim-Poncin wrote:
>
> Andrew, perhaps this article can help you onto the path of living in the
> real world...
>
> The Atlantic Monthly | December 2005
>
> Is God an Accident?
>
> Despite the vast number of religions, nearly everyone in the world believes
> in the same things: the existence of a soul, an afterlife, miracles, and the
> divine creation of the universe. Recently psychologists doing research on
> the minds of infants have discovered two related facts that may account for
> this phenomenon. One: human beings come into the world with a predisposition
> to believe in supernatural phenomena. And two: this predisposition is an
> incidental by-product of cognitive functioning gone awry. Which leads to the
> question ...
> by Paul Bloom
>
> I. God Is Not Dead
>
> When I was a teenager my rabbi believed that the Lubavitcher Rebbe, who was
> living in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, was the Messiah, and that the world was
> soon to end. He believed that the earth was a few thousand years old, and
> that the fossil record was a consequence of the Great Flood. He could
> describe the afterlife, and was able to answer adolescent questions about
> the fate of Hitler's soul.

"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> > wrote:
>
> >> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
> >> of atheists?
> >
> >In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
> >exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
> >in the LORD.
>
> Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
> demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
> not believing in pixies?

If the latter were true, there would be such a thing as apixism.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Robibnikoff wrote:
>
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> snip
> > In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
> > exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
> > in the LORD.
>
> So ****ing what?

So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.

> Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
> on people that aren't interested?

It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.

> snip
> >> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
> >
> > Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
>
> Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested in
> your delusions.

That is not what I discern.

> --
> Robyn
> Resident Witchypoo
> #1557

You will remain in my prayers, dear Robyn whom I love, in Jesus' most
precious and holy name.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Robibnikoff wrote:
>
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Robibnikoff wrote:
> >>
> >> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> >> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
> >> >>
> >> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
> >> >
> >> > As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
> >>
> >> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
> >> you'll see.
> >
> > Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
> > alt.atheism?
>
> Obviously, it's not. Your preaching god-nonsense is.

You will have to make up your mind :-)

> >> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
> >
> > Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>
> My, my. What deluded wishful thinking on your part.

Truth is neither delusion nor wish.

> It's quite sad,
> really.

Without truth there can only be sadness.

> >> Think about it.
> >
> > What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>
> That the **** is a "mentation"?

It's a synonym for thinking.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Hannele Huigens wrote:
>
> Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:41 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> >:
>
> > Robibnikoff wrote:
> >>
> >> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >>>>> Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> >>>>>> Run and hide from the truth.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That is how I would describe what you just did.
> >>>>
> >>>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
> >>>
> >>> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
> >>
> >> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
> >> you'll see.
> >
> > Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
> > alt.atheism?
>
> It's our group, we decide what is and isn't appropiate here.

In truth, there is no moderator for an unmoderated USENET group.

> You're just a
> guest, behave like one.

It remains my choice to be openly Christian. Sorry if my choice bothers
you.

> >> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
> >
> > Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>
> Us being ****ed at your behaviour equals interest in your religion?

It is one form of interest.

> Dream
> on.

Truth is not a dream.

> >> Think about it.
> >
> > What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>
> So isn't it obvious yet we don't like your sanctimonious behaviour here?

The LORD's purpose for me here is not to seek popularity but to inform.

> --
> Hannele
> aa #2221

You will be in my prayers, dear Hannele whom I love, in LORD Jesus' most
precious and holy name.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Hannele Huigens wrote:
>
> Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> >:

<snip>

> > In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
> > exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
> > in the LORD.
>
> What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
> not just the one you believe in.

There is only one GOD... the LORD Almighty and He predates my existence.

> Do you really expect us to take you
> seriously?

The LORD's purpose for me here is to inform.

> >>>> Matthew 6:6
> >>>> But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
> >> hast
> >>>> shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
> >>>> which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
> >>>
> >>> A signature is not a prayer.
> >>
> >> Yours was, liar.
> >
> > Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
>
> So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.

It remains my choice to continue walking with the LORD, Whom I love with
all my heart, soul, mind and strength :-)

> >>>>> In Christ's love always,
> >>>>
> >>>> Matthew 10:14
> >>>> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
> >>>> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
> >>>
> >>> An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
> >>> rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
> >>
> >> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
> >
> > Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
>
> It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
> bothers us.

Sorry my choice to be openly Christian also bothers you so terribly.

> >>> For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
> >> how
> >>> the LORD has reshaped me:
>
> If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig.

As if a leopard can change his/her spots.

> And if you're proud of
> your reshaped life, don't apologise.

There is no shame is asking for forgiveness for ones trespasses.

> >> In your dreams, moron.
> >
> > Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
> >
> >>> http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
> >>>
> >>> In Christ's love always,
> >>
> >> More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
> >
> > Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
> > terribly.
>
> It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
> bothers us.

See above.

> > Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> > like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> > this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
> That glowing looks dangerous.

It is not.

> Have you seen a doctor about it?

Doctors that heal have the same "glow."

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

David Jensen wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:41 -0500, in alt.atheism
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in
> >:
> >Robibnikoff wrote:
> >>
> >> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
> >> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
> >> >>
> >> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
> >> >
> >> > As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
> >>
> >> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
> >> you'll see.
> >
> >Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
> >alt.atheism?
>
> Because you have no idea what atheism is and are here to sell your
> particular brand of religion.

Actually, my location is not your location.

> >> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
> >
> >Your current participation would be one clue :-)
> >
> >> Think about it.
> >
> >What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>
> Are you referring to the invention of gods by humans?

No.

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:31:55 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:

>Dear Jim,
>
>Your interest in the straight and narrow path that I am walking on with
>the LORD is appreciated. You are welcome to join in this walk anytime.

**** off and die, deliberately nasty, sanctimonious hypocrite.

>In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Jim whom I love, in
>Jesus' most precious and holy name.

What woed do you liars use for your emotions towards your
wife/girlfriend/family/etc?

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

Shove that crucifix up your arse and rotate it.

>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:

Liar.

>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,

I hope you're waering a condom - buggering 2000 year old corpses can
damage your health.

It's already damaged your mind.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:08 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:

>"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
>> >> of atheists?
>> >
>> >In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
>> >exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
>> >in the LORD.
>>
>> Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
>> demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
>> not believing in pixies?
>
>If the latter were true, there would be such a thing as apixism.

If assholes like you shoved their pixie belief doen our throats there
would be, liar.

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

**** off and die, liar.

>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:

Don't be so stupid, liar.

>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,

His mouth or his ass?

>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Dear Chris,

Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?

(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)

"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:08 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> > wrote:
>
> >"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> >> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
> >> >> of atheists?
> >> >
> >> >In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
> >> >exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
> >> >in the LORD.
> >>
> >> Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
> >> demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
> >> not believing in pixies?
> >
> >If the latter were true, there would be such a thing as apixism.
>
> If assholes like you shoved their pixie belief doen our throats there
> would be, liar.
>
> >Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> >like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> >this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
> **** off and die, liar.
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
> >
> >For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
> >the LORD has reshaped me:
>
> Don't be so stupid, liar.
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
> >
> >In Christ's love always,
>
> His mouth or his ass?
>
> >Andrew
> >http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Dear Chris,

Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?

(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
Jesus' most precious and holy name.)

Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):

http://tinyurl.com/cpayh

For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
the LORD has reshaped me:

http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt

In Christ's love always,

Andrew
http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk


"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:31:55 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> > wrote:
>
> >Dear Jim,
> >
> >Your interest in the straight and narrow path that I am walking on with
> >the LORD is appreciated. You are welcome to join in this walk anytime.
>
> **** off and die, deliberately nasty, sanctimonious hypocrite.
>
> >In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Jim whom I love, in
> >Jesus' most precious and holy name.
>
> What woed do you liars use for your emotions towards your
> wife/girlfriend/family/etc?
>
> >Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
> >like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
> >this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
> Shove that crucifix up your arse and rotate it.
>
> >http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
> >
> >For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
> >the LORD has reshaped me:
>
> Liar.
>
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
> >
> >In Christ's love always,
>
> I hope you're waering a condom - buggering 2000 year old corpses can
> damage your health.
>
> It's already damaged your mind.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:

I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.

>Dear Chris,
>
>Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?

Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", asshole?

Why are you so stupid? I'd have have to believe in it to be angry at
it.

And my parents created me, not some figment of your deluded
imagination.

>(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
>Jesus' most precious and holy name.)

You don't love me, sanctimonious liar.

And it takes a particularly nasty believer to tell somebody he knows
is an atheist, that he will pray for him.

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,

His mouth or his ass?

>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
>(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
>Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
>
>"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:08 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:43 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >> And you imagine your god-crap is on-topic and that you speak on behalf
>> >> >> of atheists?
>> >> >
>> >> >In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
>> >> >exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
>> >> >in the LORD.
>> >>
>> >> Are you really so stupid you can't grasp that it's merely a
>> >> demographic label for what we're not? And that it is no different than
>> >> not believing in pixies?
>> >
>> >If the latter were true, there would be such a thing as apixism.
>>
>> If assholes like you shoved their pixie belief doen our throats there
>> would be, liar.
>>
>> >Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>> >like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>> >this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>>
>> **** off and die, liar.
>>
>> >http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>> >
>> >For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>> >the LORD has reshaped me:
>>
>> Don't be so stupid, liar.
>>
>> >http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>> >
>> >In Christ's love always,
>>
>> His mouth or his ass?
>>
>> >Andrew
>> >http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:44 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:

>Dear Chris,
>
>Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?

Why are you such a deliberately nasty, in-your-face liar?

I'd have to believe in it to be angry at it,moron.

>(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
>Jesus' most precious and holy name.)

Says the sanctomoniously nasty retard who can only be lying about his
"MD/PhD".

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,

His mouth or his ass?

>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
>
>
>"Christopher A. Lee" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:31:55 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >Dear Jim,
>> >
>> >Your interest in the straight and narrow path that I am walking on with
>> >the LORD is appreciated. You are welcome to join in this walk anytime.
>>
>> **** off and die, deliberately nasty, sanctimonious hypocrite.
>>
>> >In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Jim whom I love, in
>> >Jesus' most precious and holy name.
>>
>> What woed do you liars use for your emotions towards your
>> wife/girlfriend/family/etc?
>>
>> >Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>> >like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>> >this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>>
>> Shove that crucifix up your arse and rotate it.
>>
>> >http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>> >
>> >For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>> >the LORD has reshaped me:
>>
>> Liar.
>>
>> >
>> >http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>> >
>> >In Christ's love always,
>>
>> I hope you're waering a condom - buggering 2000 year old corpses can
>> damage your health.
>>
>> It's already damaged your mind.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:23:53 -0500, "Robibnikoff"
> spake thusly:

>
>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
>> "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>>>
>>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>>> > > Run and hide from the truth.
>>> >
>>> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>>>
>>> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>>
>> As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>
>It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>you'll see.
>
>Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>Think about it.

What makes you think that Christians are interested
in the rantings of atheists? Yet there they are, in
atheist news groups. So if you don't want to see it,
then don't cross post into Christian news groups.

--

Pastor Dave

Remove the "123" and "321"
from email to email me.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:36 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in
>:
>David Jensen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:40:41 -0500, in alt.atheism
>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in
>> >:
>> >Robibnikoff wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > "JessHC, aa#2220 thanks to Jason Gastrich's effort" wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> >> >> > Pramesh Rutajit wrote:
>> >> >> > > Run and hide from the truth.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > That is how I would describe what you just did.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This is unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism.
>> >> >
>> >> > As if you write for the others who participate in alt.atheism
>> >>
>> >> It IS unappreciated and off-topic in alt.atheism. Go read the FAQ and
>> >> you'll see.
>> >
>> >Why would atheism (running and hiding from the truth) be off-topic for
>> >alt.atheism?
>>
>> Because you have no idea what atheism is and are here to sell your
>> particular brand of religion.
>
>Actually, my location is not your location.

You are posting your doctrines to alt.atheism. If you don't want them to
be laughed at, don't post to places where people can think critically.

>> >> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>> >
>> >Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>> >
>> >> Think about it.
>> >
>> >What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>>
>> Are you referring to the invention of gods by humans?
>
>No.

In that case, you insist on your religion being true because you have no
evidence to support it in any other way.

>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,
>
>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

Why would I trust you as a doctor?

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:25:08 -0600, David Jensen
> wrote:

>On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:36 -0500, in alt.atheism
>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in

>
>In that case, you insist on your religion being true because you have no
>evidence to support it in any other way.
>
>>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>>
>>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>>the LORD has reshaped me:
>>
>>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>>
>>In Christ's love always,
>>
>>Andrew
>>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
>
>Why would I trust you as a doctor?

If he really were a doctor I would expect more humanity from him. I
hope he doesn't treat his cardiac patients the way he treats us - the
last thing they need is anything to raise their blood pressure. I
certainly wouldn't want him treating my loved ones.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:32:30 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in
>:
>Hannele Huigens wrote:
>>
>> Op Mon, 28 Nov 2005 22:40:43 +0100 schreef Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>> >:
>
><snip>
>
>> > In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
>> > exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their faith
>> > in the LORD.
>>
>> What utter and total nonsense, we're atheists concerning any and all gods,
>> not just the one you believe in.
>
>There is only one GOD... the LORD Almighty and He predates my existence.

Which god is that? There are many gods claimed to have been mighty. How
do you determine that your god is the right one and that it exists?

>> Do you really expect us to take you
>> seriously?
>
>The LORD's purpose for me here is to inform.

Who about what? This is posted to sci.med.cardiology,
alt.christnet.public, rec.food.cooking, alt.atheism. I suppose that the
christnet folks expect this, but your claims are certainly inappropriate
for a cooking newsgroup and by posting to an atheism group, you assure
yourself of a lot of annoyed respondents. I have no idea why you would
post to cardiology so I've cut out the food and the heart for followups.

>> >>>> Matthew 6:6
>> >>>> But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou
>> >> hast
>> >>>> shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father
>> >>>> which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.
>> >>>
>> >>> A signature is not a prayer.
>> >>
>> >> Yours was, liar.
>> >
>> > Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
>>
>> So you're a sucker for punishment? That figures.
>
>It remains my choice to continue walking with the LORD, Whom I love with
>all my heart, soul, mind and strength :-)

You think you are, but have no way of showing this.

>> >>>>> In Christ's love always,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Matthew 10:14
>> >>>> And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye
>> >>>> depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet.
>> >>>
>> >>> An unmoderated USENET newsgroup is neither a house nor a city but
>> >>> rather like the plains of the wild west :-)
>> >>
>> >> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
>> >
>> > Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
>>
>> It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
>> bothers us.
>
>Sorry my choice to be openly Christian also bothers you so terribly.

It really wasn't clear that you were Christian. The teachings of how
Christians should behave don't include your behavior here.

>> >>> For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for
>> >> how
>> >>> the LORD has reshaped me:
>>
>> If you were truly sorry you should omit the sig.
>
>As if a leopard can change his/her spots.
>
>> And if you're proud of
>> your reshaped life, don't apologise.
>
>There is no shame is asking for forgiveness for ones trespasses.

Then please do so.

>> >> In your dreams, moron.
>> >
>> > Ouch. You may have at the other cheek.
>> >
>> >>> http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>> >>>
>> >>> In Christ's love always,
>> >>
>> >> More sanctimonious nastiness on your part.
>> >
>> > Again, sorry my choice to be openly Christian continues to bother you so
>> > terribly.
>>
>> It's more your sanctimonious behaviour in an atheist newsgroup that
>> bothers us.
>
>See above.
>
>> > Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>> > like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>> > this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>>
>> That glowing looks dangerous.
>
>It is not.
>
>> Have you seen a doctor about it?
>
>Doctors that heal have the same "glow."
>
>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,
>
>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk

I guess you're just here to advertise.

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, in alt.atheism
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in
>:
>Dear Chris,
>
>Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?

I wasn't aware that you were God.

I suppose I should have been, most surgeons think they are.

>(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
>Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
>
>Would be more than happy to "glow" and chat about this and other things
>like cardiology, diabetes and nutrition that interest those following
>this thread here during the next on-line chat (12/08/05):
>
>http://tinyurl.com/cpayh
>
>For those who are put off by the signature, my advance apologies for how
>the LORD has reshaped me:
>
>http://tinyurl.com/bgfqt
>
>In Christ's love always,
>
>Andrew
>http://tinyurl.com/b6xwk
>(In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Chris whom I love, in
>Jesus' most precious and holy name.)
>
....

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:57:00 -0500, in alt.atheism
Christopher A. Lee > wrote in
>:
>On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:47:42 -0500, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
> wrote:
>
>I can't believe this psychotic is an MD and PhD.
>
>>Dear Chris,
>>
>>Why are you so angry at the LORD Almighty, Who created you ?
>
>Do you imagine that you are "the LORD Almighty", asshole?

He's a surgeon.

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> Dear Jim,
>
> Your interest in the straight and narrow path that I am walking on with
> the LORD is appreciated. You are welcome to join in this walk anytime.
>
> In the interim, you will be in my prayers, dear Jim whom I love, in
> Jesus' most precious and holy name.

Hahahah
Andrew, you are a classic example of a passive/aggressive personality.

When did you first get on this Jesus kick? As a child, young adult, later?

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> Dear Jim,
>
> Your interest in the straight and narrow path that I am walking on with
> the LORD is appreciated. You are welcome to join in this walk anytime.

Naw, I prefer to walk on the wild side
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> Robibnikoff wrote:
>>
>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>> snip
>> > In truth, just as night can not exist without day, atheism would not
>> > exist were it not for the existence of those who have placed their
>> > faith
>> > in the LORD.
>>
>> So ****ing what?
>
> So our chat has been on-topic, dear Robyn.

Not for alt.atheism.

>> Does that give you the right to inflict your religious BS
>> on people that aren't interested?
>
> It was your choice to visit the links in my posts.

What? Are you deluded? I didn't visit any links in yours posts. What makes
you think I did?

>> snip
>> >> And that justifies your bad-mannered stpidity?
>> >
>> > Sorry my choice to be openly Christian bothers you so terribly.
>>
>> Sorry you don't have a clue that people in alt.atheism aren't interested
>> in
>> your delusions.
>
> That is not what I discern.

See my remark about about your delusions.

--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
...
> Robibnikoff wrote:

snip
>> Obviously, it's not. Your preaching god-nonsense is.
>
> You will have to make up your mind :-)

You need to acquire one first, obviously, as you're posting nonsense.

>> >> Why the f' do you think we'd be interested in religious nonsense here?
>> >
>> > Your current participation would be one clue :-)
>>
>> My, my. What deluded wishful thinking on your part.
>
> Truth is neither delusion nor wish.

Nice meaningless platitude.
>
>> It's quite sad,
>> really.
>
> Without truth there can only be sadness.

See above. Oy. Do you write for the fortune cookie companies?

>> >> Think about it.
>> >
>> > What is obvious to the most casual observer requires no mentation.
>>
>> That the **** is a "mentation"?
>
> It's a synonym for thinking.

Actually, it's a typo. I was pulling your leg.

--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
#1557