~patches~ wrote:

> Being a navy cook, shecky wouldn't recognize a garnish if it bit him in
> the arse. Navy cooks basically spend 90% of their time peeling potatoes
> and 10% of their time picking their ass so it's not like they ever
> really *cook* anything <snicker>

That might be how it is in your Canadian military but certainly not in
the US military, and not for 25 years I've been exposed to the military.
Military chefs and cooks can hold their own in compitition against their
civilian counterparts.
http://www.acfchefs.org/events/team2004/tt0410c.cfm

~patches~ wrote:

> Being a navy cook, shecky wouldn't recognize a garnish if it bit him in
> the arse. Navy cooks basically spend 90% of their time peeling potatoes
> and 10% of their time picking their ass so it's not like they ever really
> *cook* anything <snicker>

Excuse me, but what kind of garnish bites people on the arse? :-)

I'm sure you're right about Pussy Katz failing to recognize it, though. If
something bit him on the arse, he'd probably just assume it was a
flirtatious pinch from his "Bathhouse Bubblers" tag-team partner, Greg
Moron.

Bob

Goomba38 wrote:

> ~patches~ wrote:
>
>> Being a navy cook, shecky wouldn't recognize a garnish if it bit him
>> in the arse. Navy cooks basically spend 90% of their time peeling
>> potatoes and 10% of their time picking their ass so it's not like
>> they ever really *cook* anything <snicker>
>
>
> That might be how it is in your Canadian military but certainly not in
> the US military, and not for 25 years I've been exposed to the military.
> Military chefs and cooks can hold their own in compitition against their
> civilian counterparts.
> http://www.acfchefs.org/events/team2004/tt0410c.cfm

With all due respect, shecky boy couldn't hold his own against a piece
of toilet paper! The US military really drew the short end of the stick
when he signed on. Without the internet to serve as his guide he likely
killed off a lot of his comrads too. I'll bet the US military was
dancing for joy when they saw the last of his sorry ass. And he still
couldn't recognize garnishes either

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> ~patches~ wrote:
>
>
>>Being a navy cook, shecky wouldn't recognize a garnish if it bit him in
>>the arse. Navy cooks basically spend 90% of their time peeling potatoes
>>and 10% of their time picking their ass so it's not like they ever really
>>*cook* anything <snicker>
>
>
> Excuse me, but what kind of garnish bites people on the arse? :-)

I'm thinking with shecky's vast cooking knowledge [sic] cockroaches
would be considered garnish. Mind you that would be rather high class
for a navy cook!

>
> I'm sure you're right about Pussy Katz failing to recognize it, though. If
> something bit him on the arse, he'd probably just assume it was a
> flirtatious pinch from his "Bathhouse Bubblers" tag-team partner, Greg
> Moron.

I *heard* that shecky was a soap dropper in the showers during his
enlisted years. Apparently it helped gloss over the fact he knew
nothing about cooking. I wonder if that's where he met Greg?

>
> Bob
>
>

Staycalm wrote:
>> Put the mustard on 1/2 the roast beef and use a sage cream on the
>> other 1/2. You can put the swiss on the side. You could also do 1/2
>> croissants instead of dinner rolls, just a thought.
>
> The croissants are higher in fat and we have quite few staff on
> diets. Also they are more expensive.
>
Hate to suggest it but maybe some of those canned "crescent rolls" rather
than rich in butter croissants - surely they aren't any more high in fat
than dinner rolls?

Jill

Staycalm wrote:
>> Liz, I didn't sneer at you or your food. I'm a picky eater. I
>> won't eat sandwiches that are pre-prepared with stuff like mustard
>> because I don't *like* mustard. I'm terribly sorry for not liking
>> mustard or for wishing I
>> could put together my own sandwich without condiments. I've been to
>> too many "pot lucks" where I didn't have any *luck* and found
>> nothing I wanted to eat, is there something wrong with that? No
>> offense intended, it's just
>> me and my picky ways. I don't eat raw vegetables or salads, either.
>> But then, I'm not going to be in attendance at your shindig so my
>> taste doesn't
>> really matter.
>>
> You sound a bit like half the members of my family lol
> My BIL is awful to cook for. He won't eat anything "fancy". To him
> anything that isn't steak and potatoes is fancy. Lasagne is fancy.
> Chicken Kiev is fancy. Vegetables are fancy. I'm glad I don't have to
> cook for him all the time. I'd be in prison for justifiable homicide!!
>
> Liz

Funny thing, I would eat your lasagna; I'd definitely eat your chicken kiev.
I'll eat practically any *cooked* vegetable or legume or soup you put in
front of me Peace?

Jill

~patches~ wrote:

> With all due respect, shecky boy couldn't hold his own against a piece
> of toilet paper! The US military really drew the short end of the stick
> when he signed on. Without the internet to serve as his guide he likely
> killed off a lot of his comrads too. I'll bet the US military was
> dancing for joy when they saw the last of his sorry ass. And he still
> couldn't recognize garnishes either

For someone who recently said she'd stop giving Sheldon any attention,
you seem to contradict that by repeatedly bringing his name up, or
talking about him. How old are you anyway? I had this idea you were in
your fifties or sixties, so I'd reckon you'd not want to appear so
petulant and childish? Take the high road and ignore him, for Godsake.

jmcquown wrote:

> Staycalm wrote:
>
>>>Put the mustard on 1/2 the roast beef and use a sage cream on the

Sage cream - can you please share the recipe?

>>>other 1/2. You can put the swiss on the side. You could also do 1/2
>>>croissants instead of dinner rolls, just a thought.
>>
>>The croissants are higher in fat and we have quite few staff on
>>diets. Also they are more expensive.
>>
>
> Hate to suggest it but maybe some of those canned "crescent rolls" rather
> than rich in butter croissants - surely they aren't any more high in fat
> than dinner rolls?
>
> Jill
>
>

Goomba38 wrote:

> That might be how it is in your Canadian military but certainly not in the
> US military, and not for 25 years I've been exposed to the military.
> Military chefs and cooks can hold their own in compitition against their
> civilian counterparts.
> http://www.acfchefs.org/events/team2004/tt0410c.cfm

Where in that article does it say that they competed against their CIVILIAN
COUNTERPARTS? The article specifically said that the Army team competed in
the MILITARY DIVISION. In other words, they DIDN'T compete against
civilians, they competed against OTHER MILITARY TEAMS. You dolt!

Looks like Pussy's sock puppet's reading comprehension is on a par with
Pussy's own inability to read.

Bob

Goomba38 wrote:

> ~patches~ wrote:
>
>> With all due respect, shecky boy couldn't hold his own against a piece
>> of toilet paper! The US military really drew the short end of the
>> stick when he signed on. Without the internet to serve as his guide
>> he likely killed off a lot of his comrads too. I'll bet the US
>> military was dancing for joy when they saw the last of his sorry ass.
>> And he still couldn't recognize garnishes either
>
>
> For someone who recently said she'd stop giving Sheldon any attention,
> you seem to contradict that by repeatedly bringing his name up, or
> talking about him. How old are you anyway? I had this idea you were in
> your fifties or sixties, so I'd reckon you'd not want to appear so
> petulant and childish? Take the high road and ignore him, for Godsake.


Goomba, I think you have me pegged for someone else. I'm not near the
fifties yet. I don't recall saying I wouldn't give shecky attention as
long as it can be a cheap shot and I don't have to see any of his
replies. I have likely made it clear I won't get into a direct ****ing
match with the toolbit but that doesn't stop me from having a little
fun. You see some here know full well that many have shecky kfed but
insist on reposting his verbal nonsense so a little back his way is only
fair. Few here take the high road regarding shecky because of all the
shecky supporters, so why should I? And why are *you* even worrying
about this unless you are one of his supporters as well. I don't tell
you what to post so don't even bother telling me what to post. You were
so concerned at bringing in the US vs. Canada military thing, you likely
missed the tongue in cheek, let's see if we can make shecky's head
burst attitude. Weren't you? I maintain my stance that shecky cannot
and has not ever been able to recognize a garnish.

PS. Shouldn't you be in the chat room with the rest of the elite?

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Goomba38 wrote:
>
>
>>That might be how it is in your Canadian military but certainly not in the
>>US military, and not for 25 years I've been exposed to the military.
>>Military chefs and cooks can hold their own in compitition against their
>>civilian counterparts.
>>http://www.acfchefs.org/events/team2004/tt0410c.cfm
>
>
> Where in that article does it say that they competed against their CIVILIAN
> COUNTERPARTS? The article specifically said that the Army team competed in
> the MILITARY DIVISION. In other words, they DIDN'T compete against
> civilians, they competed against OTHER MILITARY TEAMS. You dolt!


Ok, try this one:
http://www.moaa.org/Magazine/september2003/f_cook.asp

Tell me, if you complain so much about Sheldon's rudeness, why are you
behaving so rudely yourself?

Bob Terwilliger wrote:

> Goomba38 wrote:
>
>
>>That might be how it is in your Canadian military but certainly not in the
>>US military, and not for 25 years I've been exposed to the military.
>>Military chefs and cooks can hold their own in compitition against their
>>civilian counterparts.
>>http://www.acfchefs.org/events/team2004/tt0410c.cfm
>
>
> Where in that article does it say that they competed against their CIVILIAN
> COUNTERPARTS? The article specifically said that the Army team competed in
> the MILITARY DIVISION. In other words, they DIDN'T compete against
> civilians, they competed against OTHER MILITARY TEAMS. You dolt!
>
> Looks like Pussy's sock puppet's reading comprehension is on a par with
> Pussy's own inability to read.
>
> Bob
>
>

I didn't even bother going to the article. I for one am sick & tired of
the *shecky supporters*. Shecky can say whatever he wants and if anyone
even dares to talk back, the shecky supporters come out in full force.
Well shecky can go screw himself & take all his supporters with him for
all I care. I'll post what I want. I will say I concur with your
assessment of Goomba's comprehension skills. Pity ;(

~patches~ wrote:
> Goomba38 wrote:
>
>> ~patches~ wrote:
>>
>>> With all due respect, shecky boy couldn't hold his own against a
>>> piece of toilet paper! The US military really drew the short end
>>> of the stick when he signed on. Without the internet to serve as
>>> his guide he likely killed off a lot of his comrads too. I'll bet
>>> the US military was dancing for joy when they saw the last of his
>>> sorry ass. And he still couldn't recognize garnishes either
>>
>>
>> For someone who recently said she'd stop giving Sheldon any
>> attention, you seem to contradict that by repeatedly bringing his
>> name up, or talking about him. How old are you anyway? I had this
>> idea you were in your fifties or sixties, so I'd reckon you'd not
>> want to appear so petulant and childish? Take the high road and
>> ignore him, for Godsake.
>
>
> Goomba, I think you have me pegged for someone else. I'm not near the
> fifties yet. I don't recall saying I wouldn't give shecky attention
> as long as it can be a cheap shot and I don't have to see any of his
> replies.

That's just childish.
>
> PS. Shouldn't you be in the chat room with the rest of the elite?

"Elite"? TINC

Jill

Goomba38 wrote:
> ~patches~ wrote:
>
>> With all due respect, shecky boy couldn't hold his own against a
>> piece of toilet paper! The US military really drew the short end of
>> the stick when he signed on. Without the internet to serve as his
>> guide he likely killed off a lot of his comrads too. I'll bet the
>> US military was dancing for joy when they saw the last of his sorry
>> ass. And he still couldn't recognize garnishes either
>
> For someone who recently said she'd stop giving Sheldon any attention,
> you seem to contradict that by repeatedly bringing his name up, or
> talking about him. How old are you anyway? I had this idea you were in
> your fifties or sixties, so I'd reckon you'd not want to appear so
> petulant and childish? Take the high road and ignore him, for Godsake.

Any chance to shoot Sheldum in the butt should not be passed up!
Go Patches!


Ken.



--
http://www.rupert.net/~solar
Return address supplied by 'spammotel'
http://www.spammotel.com

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> Staycalm wrote:
>>> Put the mustard on 1/2 the roast beef and use a sage cream on the
>>> other 1/2. You can put the swiss on the side. You could also do 1/2
>>> croissants instead of dinner rolls, just a thought.
>>
>> The croissants are higher in fat and we have quite few staff on
>> diets. Also they are more expensive.
>>
> Hate to suggest it but maybe some of those canned "crescent rolls" rather
> than rich in butter croissants - surely they aren't any more high in fat
> than dinner rolls?
>
> Jill

I don't think we get them out here. Just going to get some small dinner
rolls from the local bakery near work in the morning.

Liz

~patches~ wrote to Goomba38:

> Shouldn't you be in the chat room with the rest of the elite?

HEY! I resemble that remark! :-)

Bob

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> Peace?
>
> Jill
>
Never anything but.
"Blessed are the cheesemakers" ;-)

Liz

Goomba38 wrote:

> Ok, try this one:
> http://www.moaa.org/Magazine/september2003/f_cook.asp

I assume you're referring to this quote from CWO2 Travis Smith, chief, Craft
Skills Training Branch, Army Center of Excellence, Subsistence, and manager,
U.S. Army Culinary Arts Team (USACAT).: "Military chefs often compete
against civilians and often win-that's the caliber of food the Army team
prepares."

Problem is, that's a warrant officer simply indulging in
self-aggrandizement; there's no concrete data given. In WHAT competition
did Smith's team ever take on a team of civilian chefs and win? Was it a
chili cook-off versus the top medalists at the local Special Olympics? Find
evidence that any such competition ever took place and maybe your claim can
be given some credence, but the point is irrelevant anyway: Pussy's tenure
as a mess crank took place LONG before any of the units mentioned existed.


> Tell me, if you complain so much about Sheldon's rudeness, why are you
> behaving so rudely yourself?

I see nothing wrong with pointing out the fact that you are lying to the
newsgroup. Either you're deliberately lying, in which case **** YOU, or you
really fail to grasp the information presented in the articles, in which
case YOU ARE A ****WIT.

Is that clear enough?

Bob

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:09:29 -0500, ~patches~
> wrote:

> Shouldn't you be in the chat room with the rest of the elite?

The channel doesn't have an elite. For there to be an elite, we'd
need to print and distribute RFC Channel Elite membership cards. Our
printer is out of ink, and none of these bozos will give me their
mailing addresses, anyway. So everyone is equally un-elite. :-)

Carol

Goomba38 wrote:
> ~patches~ wrote:
>
> > Navy cooks basically spend 90% of their time peeling
>> potatoes and 10% of their time picking their ass so it's not like
>> they ever really *cook* anything <snicker>
>
>
> That might be how it is in your Canadian military but certainly not in
> the US military, and not for 25 years I've been exposed to the military.
> Military chefs and cooks can hold their own in compitition against their
> civilian counterparts.
> http://www.acfchefs.org/events/team2004/tt0410c.cfm




Some of the best food I have ever eaten was at one of the Peace Corps
camps in Puerto Rico for two months in the summer of 1964. The cooks
were all natives, ex-Air Force cooks from Ramey AFB, and the food was
sublime. They appeared to really enjoy their jobs and did them very well.

Luckily the training program required us to be very active, or we would
all have gained mucho weight.

gloria p

Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:09:29 -0500, ~patches~
> > wrote:
>
>> Shouldn't you be in the chat room with the rest of the elite?
>
> The channel doesn't have an elite. For there to be an elite, we'd
> need to print and distribute RFC Channel Elite membership cards. Our
> printer is out of ink, and none of these bozos will give me their
> mailing addresses, anyway. So everyone is equally un-elite. :-)
>
> Carol
I wish to make this perfectly clear, I bozo I may be but I am not
elite...more like eheavy, the full fat version.

On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 17:00:43 -0600, Mr Libido Incognito
> wrote:

> Damsel in dis Dress wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:09:29 -0500, ~patches~
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Shouldn't you be in the chat room with the rest of the elite?
> >
> > The channel doesn't have an elite. For there to be an elite, we'd
> > need to print and distribute RFC Channel Elite membership cards. Our
> > printer is out of ink, and none of these bozos will give me their
> > mailing addresses, anyway. So everyone is equally un-elite. :-)
> >
> > Carol
>
> I wish to make this perfectly clear, I bozo I may be but I am not
> elite...more like eheavy, the full fat version.

Haven't seen you around much. Where ya been hiding?

Carol