General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
OmManiPadmeOmelet
 
Posts: n/a
Default Ping: Sheldon, new Internet law

Just thought I'd warn ya babe!
Forwarded from Tx.guns:


HeyBubJan 9, 9:41*pm * show options
Newsgroups: tx.guns
From: "HeyBub" > - Find messages by this author
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:41:32 -0600
Local: Mon, Jan 9 2006 9:41*pm
Subject: Assault: New Definition (long)
Reply |Reply to Author| Forward| Print| View Thread| Show original|
Report Abuse


(You can skip all this yakety-yak by jumping to the "Good Parts"
version)

As some may recall in a recent thread I defined "Assault" as "A serious
threat to inflict death or serious bodily injury, coupled with the
present
ability to carry out that threat." This is the classic definition I
learned
in law school.

A consequence of that definition is that the threat must be, in the mind
of
the potential victim, able to be carried out almost immediately.
Therefore,
one presumes, an "assault" cannot be made by long distance, i.e., by
telephone, postal mail, an email, or a newsgroup.

Others (well, one other) claimed an assault CAN be made by long
distance,
such as a telephone.

All that changed today.

The president signed into law the "Violence Against Women and DOJ
Reauthorization Act."

I call your attention to Section 113* which reads, in part:

--- begin quote ---

Whoever, ...

with the intent
(B) to place a person in another State or tribal jurisdiction, or within
the
special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, in
reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to--
(i) that person;
(ii) a member of the immediate family (as defined in section 115 of that
person; or
(iii) a spouse or intimate partner of that person;

uses the mail, any INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SERVICE (emphasis added), or any
facility of interstate or foreign commerce to engage in a course of
conduct
that causes substantial emotional distress to that person or places that
person in reasonable fear of the death of, or serious bodily injury to,
any
of the persons described in clauses (i) through (iii) of subparagraph
(B);
shall be punished as provided in section 2261(b) of this title.

--- end quote

After some digging, I find the punishment in 2261(b) to be:

--- begin quote
(b) Penalties.- A person who violates this section or section 2261A
shall be
fined under this title, imprisoned-
(1) for life or any term of years, if death of the victim results;
(2) for not more than 20 years if permanent disfigurement or life
threatening bodily injury to the victim results;
(3) for not more than 10 years, if serious bodily injury to the victim
results or if the offender uses a dangerous weapon during the offense;
(4) as provided for the applicable conduct under chapter 109A if the
offense
would constitute an offense under chapter 109A (without regard to
whether
the offense was committed in the special maritime and territorial
jurisdiction of the United States or in a Federal prison); and
(5) for not more than 5 years, in any other case,
or both fined and imprisoned.

--- end quote

I assume since we're talking about a mere threat that, death, permanent
disfigurement, did not actually take place, or a dangerous weapon was
not
used in the issuance of the threat, the penalty for "cyberstalking" is 5
years in a federal pen, plus a potential fine.

Further, 47 USC 223 was amended by the new law such that it now reads
(in
part)

Whoever...

(C) makes a telephone call or utilizes a telecommunications device,
whether
or not conversation or communication ensues, without disclosing his
identity
and with intent to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass any person at the
called number or who receives the communications;

(C) in the case of subparagraph (C) of subsection (a)(1), includes any
device or software that can be used to originate telecommunications or
other
types of communications that are transmitted, in whole or in part, by
the
Internet ...

Shall be fined or imprisoned for two years or both.

GOOD PARTS VERSION
===================

If you threaten someone via email or a newsgroup posting such that the
object of your threat is placed in fear of his or her life or limb, you
have
committed the offense of "Cyberstalking" and, upon conviction, may be
confined in a federal lock-up for up to five years or fined or both.

Bottom line, you cannot issue a credible threat.

You can't even insult someone if you do so anonymously.

Further, if you use the internet, anonymously - such as a "HeyBub"
handle -
to annoy, abuse, threaten, or harass, you get a fine or slammer time up
to
two years.

Let's all thank President Bush for helping to bring needed civility to
this
newsgroup.

* "Thomas" links are not persistent. Go to www.thomas.gov *and search
for
cyberstalking * ]
--
Om.

"My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PING: Sheldon Sheldon General Cooking 11 15-12-2005 05:26 AM
PING: Sheldon AlleyGator General Cooking 0 17-04-2005 10:04 PM
ping: Sheldon ::Levelwave:: General Cooking 4 22-10-2004 05:23 AM
PING: Sheldon Nexis General Cooking 11 14-03-2004 01:56 AM
[OT] Ping: Sheldon J.J. [aka j*ni] General Cooking 9 14-11-2003 07:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"